CAN YOU RUN 15 PSI ON 91 OCTANE PUMP GAS (vs E85)? LOW-BUCK FORD BLOWER ON THE JUNKYARD LS-PART 3!

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 05. 2022
  • HOW MUCH BOOST CAN I RUN ON 91 PUMP GAS? HOW MUCH TIMING CAN I RUN ON PUMP GAS UNDER BOOST? HOW MUCH MORE POWER WILL E85 MAKE THAN 91 OCTANE? CAN I RUN A SUPERCHARGER ON PUMP GAS? CAN I RUN BOOST ON A JUNKYARD LS? WILL A FORD GT500 BLOWER WORK ON A JUNKYARD LS? HOW MUCH BOOST WILL AN M122 OR 2.3L TRINITY BLOWER MAKE ON AN LS? CHECK OUT THIS COMPARISON WHERE I RAN A FORD RACING 2.3L TVS SUPERCHARGER ON A JUNKYARD L33 5.3L EQUIPPED WITH A BRIAN TOOLEY RACING TRUCK NORRIS CAM. USING A DEMUSE ENGINEERING ADAPTER KIT, THE 2.3L TVS WAS RUN NEAR 15 PSI OF BOOST BOTH ON E85 AND ON PUMP GAS. FULL TMING CURVES SUPPLIED ON BOTH, AS WELL AS THE DIFFERENCE IN POWER!
  • Auta a dopravní prostředky

Komentáře • 293

  • @SweatyFatGuy
    @SweatyFatGuy Před 2 lety +4

    Dang 100hp down. Those roots and screw blowers REALLY like the vodka.
    Closest station to me that sells E85 is 2 hours away, and they called the cops on me last time I filled up some barrels. So they don't get my business anymore, next one is another 20 minutes south. I paid $4.40 for 87 octane today when I filled up my 2500 so I can haul gravel tomorrow. 91 is just under $5.50 here. Last year when I got E85 it was $2.10, will be getting another 150 gallons later this month, my daily driver 65 GTO run on it. So I don't know what its selling for, but I bet its well below $5.50.
    Back in 2007 when gasoline was $5 a gallon here, I started making ethanol. From '15 until last year I ran E85 rather than making it, it was dirt cheap and usually less than $2. This year I am working on getting the production up. The plan is to never buy pump gas again, not even for my generator when the power goes out here. I don't even build engines with pump gas compression anymore. Its 12:1 or more with all my engines. Still trying to get that much from the LS truck engines, but for now 706 heads on a 6.0 works good enough.

  • @MrPhukyew
    @MrPhukyew Před 2 lety +11

    My daily driver runs 91 octane on an lq4 daily with a lil added ring gap and head studs. 12psi is max but it see's 12psi multiple times a day. Stock cam and springs and stock 317's. 9.5:1 compression and 2 very small 53mm t3 turbochargers with international wastegates and a factory duramax intercooler and radiator. I get 17 MPG highway and it has 600+ ft lb of torque from 2400 all the way to 5,400 RPM. Has done highway trips with 10k lbs behind it without issues

    • @moabman6803
      @moabman6803 Před 4 měsíci

      When does the boost start to climb with that setup?

    • @mxreese69r6
      @mxreese69r6 Před 2 měsíci

      A random stranger with no proof says out of vaccum at 1780-1830rpm / 1+ psi 1870-1900rpm / 5psi 2,100rpm / 10-12 psi 2300-2390psi

  • @garymorel1882
    @garymorel1882 Před 2 lety +16

    Hey Richard I just want to step up and say thank you for making this video because I am one of those guys that always wants to see stuff on pump gas really appreciate it thanks again

  • @Riley_1955
    @Riley_1955 Před 2 lety +5

    Good to know Richard.....Tests like these are going to answer a lot of questions people need answered......Keep'em coming.

  • @nimblybimbly4002
    @nimblybimbly4002 Před 2 lety +4

    Thanks for the 91 octane info. It's all I can get in my area.

  • @c2welding625
    @c2welding625 Před 2 lety +2

    This is what I’ve been waiting for would love to see it dialed in ring gap, timing, boost to arrive at reasonably safe numbers

  • @ziggyortiz37
    @ziggyortiz37 Před měsícem +1

    I love this video!! Thank you. Very much needed. It’s nice to see what we can do with pump gas and how we can maximize what we can get out of pump fuel (premium 91 or 93 of course). Hope to see you do some more pump gas videos.

  • @handsomeroblordandprotecto8459
    @handsomeroblordandprotecto8459 Před 4 měsíci +3

    I would really like to see the difference in power at at 6, 8 ,10, 12, 14 lbs boost with different pullies ,etc. Great videos ,THANKS

  • @milesfuller797
    @milesfuller797 Před rokem +3

    You are one of the most helpful CZcamsrs ever thanks so much for your vids im 17 and thinking about running a 2.8lc KB on my bone stock 4.6 2v and i have so many questions that are hard to find the answers to even on google and you answered alot of them but i still have a few and im just going to wait until you go live again but thank you so much for making these videos

  • @PMcGuffin
    @PMcGuffin Před 2 lety +2

    Glad it didn’t blow up. I’m really digging all the tests with the L33. Just in case my current set up is lackluster I’ll know where to go from there.

  • @yucannthahvitt251
    @yucannthahvitt251 Před 2 lety +4

    Good vid, I definitely like the pump gas vids more than race gas tests, race gas is super expensive and almost nobody runs it in their street cars, which is what most of us have. I know it's a completely different animal because the power bands are vastly different, but it's interesting that you got 599 at the crank out of a blown 5.3 on 91oct, and I made 618 on a dynapack with a 3.0 (S366SXE) on 93oct. The magic of turbocharging, with its lower losses, improved compressor efficiency, and easier intercooler integration.

    • @yucannthahvitt251
      @yucannthahvitt251 Před 5 měsíci

      E85 is not universally available@@keith-jo6wg it's actually downright hard to find in some areas.

  • @jason.arthur.taylor
    @jason.arthur.taylor Před 2 lety +1

    bless you for this video richard!

  • @trefunk3743
    @trefunk3743 Před 2 lety +1

    Love it as always!

  • @yarrdayarrdayarrda
    @yarrdayarrdayarrda Před 2 lety +2

    DATA!!!! We took over a 408 LS build from another shop that had issues, boat engine, small Vortec non intercooled deal. We reduced compression, swapped in a much smaller cam (6500 is no bueno for a family style river boat cruising for hours) and replaced the factory EFI with a Terminator kit. It made OK power but since it runs between 3000 and 4500 and has to run on 91 octane I was puzzled why I was stuck with about 9 degrees timing while under boost (about 6 PSI) but with this video it makes perfect sense, and how excellent is is to see the timing table. We have on order a Whipple LS kit with integral intercooler so it'll go back on the dyno for some tuning with the new setup. I don't expect to be able to run any more timing but we should be able to step up the boost a bit since it will have an efficient intercooler and river water as coolant. Going to take pictures of Richard's timing tables just for reference, it'll be interesting to see how different they look.
    Thanks Richard, this information is basically unavailable, there are little hints you can find here on CZcams (Joe Simpson has hours of CZcams videos on Holley EFI) but rarely does it relate directly (lower RPM high load) to marine applications. You're AWESOME!!!

  • @prostockjohn1967
    @prostockjohn1967 Před 2 lety +1

    Great comparison!

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 Před 3 měsíci +1

    great video Rich

  • @mp5778
    @mp5778 Před 2 lety +3

    Great testing and results.
    Now add WMI to the 91 octane!!

  • @morelanmn
    @morelanmn Před 2 lety +1

    Way to produce a new quality video!!!

  • @leebrady6326
    @leebrady6326 Před 2 lety +1

    Great comparison..

  • @michaelblacktree
    @michaelblacktree Před 2 lety +21

    That's a big difference! Now I'm curious to see if reducing timing or reducing boost would be better for that combination on pump gas. Which one will lose the least amount of power?

    • @ChurchAutoTest
      @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety +17

      Won't be much difference in final power, but the less boost engine will be happier. Pulling out a bunch of timing kills combustion efficiency and jumps up the coolant temps and EGT.

    • @BrodeyDoverosx
      @BrodeyDoverosx Před 2 lety +4

      @@ChurchAutoTest exactly. Reducing boost also helps to keep intake temps cooler and the forced induction devices get less wear and tear.

  • @TheNumbers400
    @TheNumbers400 Před 2 lety +7

    A follow up on this video could be a repeat with pump gas and water methanol injection. Us that can not get pump E85 may have the option to run w/m injection. I am going to do so on my build and would love to know the actual value of w/m to a boosted pump gas engine. I am building a LSA blown 6.0

    • @simpleman2004
      @simpleman2004 Před 2 lety +2

      I would like too see this as well.

    • @jeffwenke
      @jeffwenke Před 2 lety +1

      on my sti I added about 100 hp and 6 psi of boost going from pump gas to meth injection with a 20 cc sprayer so about half way between pump and e85 values for the turbo I run on it. Not sure how much comparison to that is.

    • @simpleman2004
      @simpleman2004 Před 2 lety

      @@jeffwenke Well that's good to know, thanks for posting. I was kinda bummed thinking how much I would lose just being on pump. Im in the thinking stage of a ZL1 blower on my LS1.

  • @jimfryar1
    @jimfryar1 Před 2 lety +2

    Now show us those ol hotroddin tricks to be able to get the timing back up some on that level of boost!! I know you got some ol school tricks up your sleeve!!
    Only really one thing left to do with this setup..... stroke the 5.3 to a 383 THEN let’s see what happens!!! ESPECIALLY on the 91!
    Thanx Richard!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +1

      adding displacement will bring the boost down and push power up-less compression will bring boost down and power down, water/meth cam help ad timing

  • @delharris6189
    @delharris6189 Před 2 lety +6

    Awesome info for us poor fellas with no pump E85, but how is the power comparison to E85 and 91 Pump with meth injection. Thatvwould be another very useful video I fell, help us guys here in Canada and cold climates a hence to see good boost numbers and power.

  • @RobertsChannell
    @RobertsChannell Před 2 lety +1

    yup , time for a bit of water inj , i ran my 215 buick /rover on 9.25:1, 20 psi boost , and 87 octane , with enough water ..no alcohol.. it's fine .

  • @danadamczyk3295
    @danadamczyk3295 Před 2 lety +1

    This is literally the same exact difference in power on my old 2012 gt500 with a 2.3 vmp tvs at about 18 psi. Made 702 rwhp on e85 and 598 rwhp on 93 octane. Boost for boost 24 degrees timing e85 and about 17 degrees on 93 and boostane.

  • @timdontwannasay5889
    @timdontwannasay5889 Před 2 lety +3

    If you ever take that l33 apart I'd love to know the ring gap that's in there now! Almost 15psi without checking the gap?! I'd be sweating EVERY RUN! 😆 Thank you Richard.

    • @jeffcurrie123
      @jeffcurrie123 Před 10 měsíci

      Same because im.gonna send it as well lol

  • @johnclary729
    @johnclary729 Před 2 lety +2

    When Brule did the 91/E85 comparisons for Engine Masters with the NA LS the timing was the same without much difference in power, slightly more with E85 but same timing. It basically didn't care what it was running on as long as the F/A was right, the timing was 29 BTDC no matter what.

    • @jarlnieminen4307
      @jarlnieminen4307 Před 2 lety +1

      Yes with the same inlet temperature/pressures the timing will remain roughly the same. Boost changes that.

    • @johnclary729
      @johnclary729 Před 2 lety

      @@jarlnieminen4307 the testing was done with the same engine, running the same boost, using the same intercooler, using dyno water in the intercooler. They should have made best power and lowest EGT at the same timing, if the Engine Masters test was valid. Personally I prefer to run at the lowest EGT I can because it extends the valve life significantly.

    • @jarlnieminen4307
      @jarlnieminen4307 Před 2 lety

      @@johnclary729 Thats not how it works. It does not matter that he ran the same boost the added cylinder pressure makes it advantageous to run E85 because thats where the 91 octane requires less ignition.

  • @stephenhodge6441
    @stephenhodge6441 Před 2 lety +2

    Wow that is huge. Sucks I can't get e85 in my area

  • @ne2i
    @ne2i Před 2 lety +1

    Get down when you hear that sound! Boost!

  • @jeffkloppel541
    @jeffkloppel541 Před rokem +1

    Great stuff Richard! I’m assuming that when you’re going from e85 to pump gas you’re accounting for the stoic number changing between the two? How do you end up at 11.5:1 on e85? I’ve read it’s easier to use Lambda when switching between fuels but AFR seems to be the common number used. I always like learning new stuff! Keep it up!!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před rokem +1

      we use the gas scale so the amount of fuel supplied for e85 increases to achieve the same af

  • @benhowe2087
    @benhowe2087 Před 2 lety +3

    I think that with pump gas meth injection could help with adding timing and keeping boost at 15 psi. Be nice to know air inlet temps below intercooler. You added meth to E85 blown engine. Did not to much. But the E85 does the same thing as meth injection. On pump gas it may be the answer.

  • @TonyTheTruckGuy
    @TonyTheTruckGuy Před rokem +1

    Damn. 100 hp and 50 tq just from fuel. Really wanted a 91 build since that’s so much more available, but them power numbers are hard to pass up lol

  • @e30rudeboytuningexperement26

    1 would like to see what would happen if you added meth/injection to the 91 octane setup

  • @jesvans
    @jesvans Před 2 lety +1

    i run 91 with over 15psi no problem. built 97 4.3(stock bottom end), Vortech V2-SQ, ford powerstroke intercooler.

  • @azreeal1
    @azreeal1 Před 2 lety +2

    I have a question. Obviously it would be easier with a turbo/boost controller combo, but have you ever tested to see if the horsepower loss realized pulling timing was more than the gain from the extra boost at different levels? Basically on pump gas with lets say 10:1 compression, what is the boost level that is a point of diminishing returns due to timing losses.

  • @montycrain5783
    @montycrain5783 Před 2 lety +1

    I still can’t find a website for Demeuse Engineering. Have you tested 91 with water injection? I remember some of Holley’s ECUs can control it. For 91 octane a 6.0 truck motor might be a better choice. Also you might compare that blower with a Eaton m-122 since it would much less expensive. Maybe the 2.3 as well.

  • @jimkillen1065
    @jimkillen1065 Před 2 lety +3

    I really appreciate your videos . How do i buy your books . i was thinking you got a lot of experience in tuning and building engines thanks Jim

  • @BoostedCajun
    @BoostedCajun Před 2 lety +1

    Compare 91 to 93? Add fuel additives like octane booster? Does any of that really make a difference? It would be cool to see you test the fuel grades and additives, store bought additives from your local part store.

  • @allan80supra
    @allan80supra Před 2 lety +1

    ...and this is why you setup a street blower car with a flex fuel sensor and ECU that can adjust for it

  • @cliffbadazz318
    @cliffbadazz318 Před rokem +1

    You should test on better flowing heads

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 Před 3 měsíci +1

    It was very interesting checking out the different fuels
    What I gathered was Nitro is 1 atom 4 oxy methane was 1nitride and 3 oxy
    Gas or octane is 1 nitride 2 oxy methane being a little more volitile
    Nitro Metane the big boys use is Nitro Methane Hydrogen That amplifies it like H Bomb
    Same way a Rocket goes to moon Then Supercharged
    The E85 with Ethanol Has water in hydrogen that has a lot of oxygen but after it burns makes water and if it sets any length of time its a injector destoyer Alcohol drying up big portion of it The Hydrogen adding 10-20 horsepower
    The thing with E 85 and nitro methane is they are burning Way more fuel to do it .
    my 93 gas mix is 12 % Nitro about 40% nut or caster bean oil Working to lube like 2 stoke oil lubes piston rings its light oil
    some have synthetic causing great heat burning off
    40 percent corn Alcohol
    The ultimate test would be if you can put All that Advance in ignition you do
    with E 85 with my Nitro mix lol
    because the octane is so high the 93 having alcohol in it and magic nut and bean oils lol
    I say put them to Dyno

  • @powerviking
    @powerviking Před 2 lety +1

    Oh that poor little belt I was waiting for it to give up the ghost!!!

  • @jdcustomz
    @jdcustomz Před rokem +1

    Trying to make a habit of getting prepared to watch to your video's by letting the commercials roll brother. Everyone try to make a habit, especially when video is starting. Let's make Richard the next Mr Beast $$$$$

  • @themr2guy
    @themr2guy Před 2 lety +8

    How about a test to show the best street tune for this setup on 91 octane? For example Optimize timing and boost levels to arrive at a safe reliable daily driver.

  • @cesarortega6615
    @cesarortega6615 Před 2 lety +1

    Which supercharger has the biggest displacement and which one do you prefer based on power and how expensive it is to installed

  • @ARavenousChimp
    @ARavenousChimp Před 2 lety +1

    Could you possibly do a walk around of that blower manifold? Unless it was in the live stream. I was looking for somewhere to get a price idea on it and I can't find it. GT500 blower on a 6.0 for my foxbody sounds like a riot!

    • @moabman6803
      @moabman6803 Před 2 lety

      The adapter plate is 2500.00. Very expensive.

  • @bleach_drink_me
    @bleach_drink_me Před 2 lety +1

    My turbo cars run 93oct and wmi since I have few e85 stations around. Would like to switch to e85 but not happening anytime soon.

  • @realshidd3062
    @realshidd3062 Před 2 lety +3

    It’s crazy this fbo 5.3 with cam and ford blower makes more hp than Zl1

    • @ericvaughn2875
      @ericvaughn2875 Před 2 lety +4

      Please note and be aware that "from the factory" the tune is optimized with fuel efficiency in mind and ran with ALL accessories.
      Here it is not optimized for efficiency, just maximum for comparison and it is not ran with any accessories.

    • @realshidd3062
      @realshidd3062 Před 2 lety +2

      @@ericvaughn2875 yes I know that but still makes more than 650hp with accessories I bet.

    • @ChurchAutoTest
      @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety +1

      @@realshidd3062 Or look at it this way. Run an LT4 at cold temps, with dyno water for the intercooler (which is a big problem on LT4s), long tube headers and no cats with an optimized tune. Guarantee it'll make way over 700 hp at the crank. Just running E50 on a stock LT4 with long tubes, intake and tune will net out an additional 100 hp over stock on a chassis dyno. Really no comparison. And the LT4 blower is a tiny little 1.7

    • @ericvaughn2875
      @ericvaughn2875 Před 2 lety

      czcams.com/video/yHHLDDrIce4/video.html
      Yeh the accessories did not cost but like 50 tq.

    • @ericvaughn2875
      @ericvaughn2875 Před 2 lety +1

      I get ya tho. Idk much in the new LT stuff but I'll be an LS fan for time to come.

  • @StevenAndrews
    @StevenAndrews Před 2 lety +1

    Is there any way to measure the clearance from the valley cover to the top of the blower? I've got very little hood clearance and this looks so close.

  • @ren3gade__
    @ren3gade__ Před rokem +2

    This making want to do for my 03 tahoe hell or my 944 with a swapped ls

  • @hondatech5000
    @hondatech5000 Před 2 lety +1

    So your saying there’s a chance :p wow what a power swing.

  • @dudewutuptube
    @dudewutuptube Před 2 lety +5

    Timing view definitely helps us backyard tuners

    • @b.c4066
      @b.c4066 Před 2 lety +2

      Every engine is different. Testing for best timing on your engine, in your car, with your transmission, with your converter, your exhaust, blah blah blah is what will help you. Learning to read a spark plug and timing YOUR engine according to the fuel you will run will help you. Blindly using Richards timing curves will probably get you in trouble. Too many variables.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +2

      Richard told you specifically NOT to us those timing curves

    • @b.c4066
      @b.c4066 Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 so many watch these videos and think it's the same engine, same boost so I'll use this timing or this afr etc. What they need to understand is there is no getting around testing to find out what works best for their exact combination. What you can get away with for 20-30 seconds on a Dyno with a wot pull at 130-140° coolant temperature is almost a guaranteed way to cause engine damage for these guys. They are looking at your videos for tuning info and taking it as Gospel and that's just bad. I'm grateful for your time, efforts, and content. Just hate to see someone blindly clone what you are doing and ruin an expensive engine.

  • @robertwofford8910
    @robertwofford8910 Před 4 měsíci +1

    I believe these lags can be augmented by a tune relative to the octane/alcohol content

  • @nimblybimbly4002
    @nimblybimbly4002 Před 2 lety +1

    I'd be happy to just watch a continuous shot of the engine doing the pull. The still images cut in to the video don't add much for me. 3:02

  • @Jeremyv1980
    @Jeremyv1980 Před 2 lety +2

    Damn. Us ford guys finally had a source of reasonably priced power. Now comes the @Richard Holdener tax.

    • @davidtaylor9508
      @davidtaylor9508 Před 2 lety

      Yep, just like all the ls guys that has to run fox bodies! Ford Chassis, now Ford blower, why not just build a Windsor and be done...

  • @The3chordwonder
    @The3chordwonder Před 2 lety +1

    You had made the point during the video and I believe you emphasized about not running that much boost on a PD with 91 for the street. Just for curiosity sake, could you get away with more timing with a 700HP turbo, all else being equal? Less parasitic loss, perhaps less heat = more power at same timing or even more power if the turbo setup can add timing?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety

      BOOST WOULD BE LOWER TO MAKE 700 HP WITH THE TURBO SO POSSIBLY

    • @The3chordwonder
      @The3chordwonder Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 Thank you! and thanks for your advice/comments on the live feed!

  • @LujinCustom
    @LujinCustom Před rokem +1

    I think I missed what stock tq/hp #s were on that LS, na.
    I’m building a Toyota 4 cyl street engine with 150hp na and just want to be able to double the output on Costco 91 with a turbo.
    Also, what about reducing compression ratio a little?

  • @patrickshaw8595
    @patrickshaw8595 Před 2 lety +1

    Try the same test with deep-dish pistons!
    IF: You could get the compression near 7-1, AND you could beg borrow or steal some "squish area" inside the CC >>> then you should be able to keep your 15psi boost on 91 and run enough timing to really kick ass.
    I already know it works great - I just want you to show these kids that 6.5 to 7-1 mechanical compression is preferred over all others for horsepower ( gas mileage SUCKS with 7-1 though !)

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +2

      that is a negative

    • @taylorsrus9543
      @taylorsrus9543 Před 2 lety +1

      At that compression you should be thinking like 40psi

    • @patrickshaw8595
      @patrickshaw8595 Před 2 lety

      @@taylorsrus9543 I'v tried 7-1 with a turbo on the street and it's a dog until you got 3-4 psi goin' and then Jekyll turns into Hyde.
      But with a blower it's all good the smooth low end torque lets you do silly stuff like climb mountains in double overdrive when you really don't have that much oil pressure or water flow.
      But throwing all that heat away eats fuel.
      I mean the pipes be red all the way to the back bumper sometimes : D
      Harry Ricardo did all the tests way back when and decided that IF you have unlimited supercharging flow and pressure available THEN for any given fuel octane rating 6.5 to 7.0 to one CR will give the most HP.

  • @robertwood3970
    @robertwood3970 Před 9 měsíci +1

    Yes, add water injection.

  • @scottforeman3590
    @scottforeman3590 Před 2 lety +1

    Love the videos!! Can I run a LSA blower on a LS1 with stock heads and stock compression, I think it’s around 10.1? Or would 317 heads be a better choice because of the combustion chamber size?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +1

      either will work with the right timing

    • @utahcountypicazospage5412
      @utahcountypicazospage5412 Před 2 lety +1

      Depends how much boost low boost stay stock heads my ls1 z28 made 491 hp 471 tq 6 psi procharged 317 you will need more boost to make same power since you will drop to 8.5-1 or so in compression

    • @scottforeman3590
      @scottforeman3590 Před 2 lety

      @@utahcountypicazospage5412 I think the LSA puts out about 9psi stock.

  • @joseiracheta3817
    @joseiracheta3817 Před 2 lety +1

    Yay.

  • @LS1NNOVATIONS
    @LS1NNOVATIONS Před 2 lety +1

    How's the stock tensioner holding up? Excessive belt slip?

  • @Bradofmaccly
    @Bradofmaccly Před rokem +1

    I’m going this route on a 416” LS3. Probably only 8-10 psi. What timing would u recommend starting at on 93?

  • @lesismore2019
    @lesismore2019 Před 2 lety +1

    I would like to see chevy stock 2.0 turbos on a 3.6 v6 to see if it would gain hp or stay the same.

    • @boostedbird4799
      @boostedbird4799 Před 2 lety +5

      It would gain hp. You're adding more air to an engine than what it can take in on it's own. You would just be limited as to how much boost and air you could add because of the turbo sizing

  • @garymorel1882
    @garymorel1882 Před 2 lety +1

    I know this is off subject
    But one thing I would like to see is a truck Norris cam in the LS 496 if they even make one

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +1

      WHY

    • @garymorel1882
      @garymorel1882 Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 because it seems like a easy monster on pump gas with the same affects of the Truck Norris to the 5.3

  • @Rome3aaro
    @Rome3aaro Před 2 lety +1

    I wish you can try a vmp on a 6.0

  • @madmod
    @madmod Před 2 lety +2

    For years, I ran a non intercooled Kenne Bell 2.2 Flowzilla on a 95 5.0 mustang gt. It was ran with 42lb injectors on 91 octane and is still running around on the same combo with the new owner. Its all in the tune for longevity but im sure a swap to e85 would have been huge for power gains on that car.

  • @MrYz250fman
    @MrYz250fman Před 6 měsíci +2

    I build all of my cars to be ran off of no more than pump 93. Its easy to get and my cars are built to drive. If e85 was more available in my area I would consider it but I also dont like that its unreliable as far as fuel quality goes depending on wich station you go to and time of the year.

  • @danielcarroll5667
    @danielcarroll5667 Před 2 lety +1

    I guess that settles that , could you hear it detonating at all when you put the timing back in with the 91 octane ? I would have been terrified.......

  • @divadyrdnal
    @divadyrdnal Před 2 lety +2

    Sweet test!!! So any guess where same horsepower can be reach if boost is reduced and timing is optimized on the 91? Just trying to form a boost/timing curve in my head…

  • @guyshred3949
    @guyshred3949 Před 2 lety +1

    Anyway that you could equalize the volume?

  • @joshuabradley7244
    @joshuabradley7244 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Hey Richard I have a 04 GTO with a Ls1 5.7 I can get a m122 cobra supercharger and would like to put it on my GTO is it possible and what would I need in order to do that? I will make a video as I don’t and send it to you if you help me with the process. Thanks in advance I love your videos

  • @TheProchargedmopar
    @TheProchargedmopar Před 2 lety +2

    👍💪

  • @moabman6803
    @moabman6803 Před 2 lety +1

    Looked up the price of the adapter kit. It's 2500.00 bucks

  • @realshidd3062
    @realshidd3062 Před 2 lety +1

    Wonder if we can see a 6.2 with 243 or 799 heads and Ford blower?? #RichardHoldener

  • @PMcGuffin
    @PMcGuffin Před 2 lety +1

    By any chance have you done any tests on cathedral port 5.3’s with an LSA supercharger?

  • @insanekiller9256
    @insanekiller9256 Před 11 měsíci +1

    Do they have an adapter for m112 eaton supercharger

  • @smithtuning
    @smithtuning Před 2 lety +1

    Hey Richard, what cam is better for boost “Sloppy Stage 2” or “Truck Norris”??

  • @taylorrichards9044
    @taylorrichards9044 Před 2 lety +1

    4.8/5.3 with a lsa be cool. testing cams.

  • @RK48frazergasser
    @RK48frazergasser Před 2 lety +6

    Hey Richard I've got a mark 4 454 two bolt main will running a 6-71 blower with 3 to 6 psi boost kill the engine I'm not going to race it just play with it and use it as a daily driver

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +2

      will be fine

    • @MyLonewolf25
      @MyLonewolf25 Před 2 lety

      It’s a big block it ain’t that fragile and you’re not running a 12-72 blower

    • @RK48frazergasser
      @RK48frazergasser Před 2 lety +4

      Thanks guys that helps alot I'm 62 lost my wife two years ago and this was our play toy. Ok mine again thank

    • @t.s.racing
      @t.s.racing Před 2 lety +2

      Mr. Kline, very sorry for your loss, I know the loss at too well. You'll be amazed just how strong a stock bottom end of big block Chevrolet is.
      My 1 recommendation is, and I'm assuming you have a cast crank, is to have a good Machinist mill a second key way in the snout, and get a harmonic balancer to match.
      This isn't mandatory, but it's good insurance for a minimal cost, especially while it's apart. Good luck Sir 👍
      T.S. RACING

    • @RK48frazergasser
      @RK48frazergasser Před 2 lety

      @@t.s.racing I'm planning to get forged crank , rods , pistons I just want it strong enough if I'm at a car show and hit hard to do burnouts. Just to have fun my wife would have had fun doing that. And thank you

  • @montycrain5783
    @montycrain5783 Před 10 měsíci +1

    I don’t understand how this package only picks up 172hp on 14 pounds of boost. I always understood that power should double with 1bar(14.7psi) of boost. That would be 854hp, I understand that the blower consumes some power, but is it eating 255 hp. I don’t know why anyone would pick this combo over about the same investment with a single turbo, plus it could run 20-25 lbs of boost on E85 and with a flex fuel sensor and turbo it would pull back the boost for 93 pump gas, plus it would make much more power with no loss for the blower drive.

  • @ChurchAutoTest
    @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety +3

    Looks about right. I run my 2650 equipped, but otherwise stock LSA at about 17 psi peak. Comes in around 13-14 psi at 3000 rpm and climbs from there. A little lower compression than your 5.3. 1/7/8" headers, 103mm throttle body. I run 25-26 deg peak ignition on E85 (it'll take 30 without knocking, but almost no gain so why beat up the bearings) with 195-200F water temps. On 91 deg I run 12-14 deg less (11-14 deg total) than the E85 map on the street in a 4000 lbs car. I run a 0.83 lambda on E85 and about 0.76 on 91. 17 psi is definitely too much for my tastes on 91, but I haven't perfected my boost controller yet, and I run 91 very infrequently. Total power loss is about 125-130 whp going from E85 to 91.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety

      26 DEGREES ON E85 AT 17 PSI?

    • @ChurchAutoTest
      @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 Yep. All day long. Motor is at 135k miles now without being opened up. Best 1/4 mile trap speed is 138 mph on street tires, 4300 lbs with driver. We've talked about timing before, sometimes I wonder if its being measured a little differently. I'm on stock ECU and sensors while you're usually running aftermarket ECU. Perhaps the indexing is a bit different? If I ran 21 deg I'd lose 50 hp easily.

    • @taylorsrus9543
      @taylorsrus9543 Před 2 lety +1

      @@ChurchAutoTest Sounds pretty normal. If you are on the stock cam and heads, your boost numbers are probably inflated so your cylinder pressure is not as high as a good flowing setup would be at that boost level.

  • @trentdawg2832
    @trentdawg2832 Před 2 lety +1

    Boostane works for my 11.15:1 lsa supercharged lq9 in my nova…..with 20 gallons of 91 the 32oz bottle of Boostane will bring it up to 97-98 octane…..if you can’t find Boostane you can settle for Torco which will yield you 95-96 octane from 20 gallons of 91……

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety

      have you lab tested the octane change?

    • @trentdawg2832
      @trentdawg2832 Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 no sir……but I can definitely tell you,,the engine approves

  • @BLUUCIFUR
    @BLUUCIFUR Před 2 lety +1

    Quick question Rich.... Do you think running an heat exchanger is a must with this setup???

  • @jimfryar1
    @jimfryar1 Před 2 lety +1

    Here’s a question for ya.... which setup gt500 m122 or Cadillac m122 makes more power? (On pump gas) and which setup (aside from the blower itself) is more cost efficient
    Thanks rich

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +1

      THE GT500 BLOWER HAS A BIGGER INLET-PUMP GAS LIMITS BOTH

    • @jimfryar1
      @jimfryar1 Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 as always, thanks for your response
      I’m grateful for all the testing you do, and videos you make!!

  • @kellylenderman7411
    @kellylenderman7411 Před 2 lety +1

    Hey Richard when are you going to do a carbureted 8.1 liter

  • @jeffcurrie123
    @jeffcurrie123 Před 10 měsíci +1

    What size belt did you use do you remember?

  • @blow0me
    @blow0me Před 2 lety +1

    What happens at say E25, 50, 75, 100 ?

  • @madmodsgarage1179
    @madmodsgarage1179 Před 2 lety +1

    Hah, in Poland all we got at the pump is 95 and 98 (yours 91, 93 I guess). So we do run 15, 30, sometimes 36 psi, on our 98 octane :) I think you could have run bit more timing on 91, depending on IATs, but there is a brick inside.. In my european Ford Granada I run a 4.0 ohv explorer engine (all stock, 9:1 CR, just added 12.9 grade head bolts) on 98. Twin tiny turbos, recently at 1.5 bar at the top (22 psi?), 21deg of timing, 40degC (104F) making 473hp at the crank

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety

      the octane measurements are different in other countries-your 98 would be like 93

    • @madmodsgarage1179
      @madmodsgarage1179 Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 yes, I know, still I think You could push it little more on 91, but I'm not an expert (You are :) ) and I completely understand keeping it safe instead of risking. After this video, I started thinking and having fears if I'm not pushing it to close to knock :) Maybe on next dyno session I will retard it 3-4 deg and check out how it reacts

  • @SeatTimeMajorPayne
    @SeatTimeMajorPayne Před 2 lety +1

    How about a test without the intercooler on e85 to see how hot the air gets? You can run his adapter without it.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +1

      THE E85 IS INJECTED AT THE PORT-YOU CAN'T MEASURE THE CHANGE IN TEMP THE COMBUSTION CHAMBER

    • @SeatTimeMajorPayne
      @SeatTimeMajorPayne Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 yep I have one of his kits. Was mainly wondering how much power you lose not using the intercooler from the air being hot

  • @jacksonjdr94
    @jacksonjdr94 Před 2 lety +1

    Would love to see an overlay comparison of this TVS blown 5.3 compared to the caddy M122 blower on the 4.8 you did about a year ago.
    From memory The TVS made about 70hp more than the M122 when both run on E85... but the TVS costs 3x the price for a used blower.

  • @tuloko16
    @tuloko16 Před 2 lety +4

    I’d be interested in seeing if the engine was experiencing any knock and at what load/rpm/timing. (For the science) of course. On a street aplication you do not want to be riding the “edge” on detonation.

  • @clintonsmith9931
    @clintonsmith9931 Před 2 lety +1

    Just going to run to the back of my 2 car garage grab a Ford racing blower
    Put it on my junkyard 5.3 Ls. That is setting on my engine Dino
    Just happened to have cam I found setting next to the blower, it had some high dollar valve springs
    To use on my high dollar cam
    A good friend gave me a high dollar adapter kit to bolt on the blower
    A set of high dollar headers
    Everyone should be able to do this
    Just the engine for my street drive 100,000 dollar 1957 Chevy convertible
    Then why would I cheep out on my fuel?.
    For the kiddos out there, gasoline burns faster than alcohol
    Therefore the more alcohol the more timing to be able to produce the power gained by using alcohol
    That is slower burning slower. Plus it takes more alcohol to produce the extra power. Therefore bigger jets or more fuel pressure. And you might run higher compression like some kids are doing now.
    Viscous circle
    My dad had a farm pu with lp gas , always wondered what would happen with high compression pistons 13 to 1,
    And more timing, but of course would’ve work cause always had to switch back to cheap gas when you ran out of butane.

  • @craigritchie1933
    @craigritchie1933 Před 2 lety +8

    Great stuff , what about 93 octane, do you think this would add a few HP or just buy you some added engine protection ?

    • @thatturbotruck
      @thatturbotruck Před 2 lety +1

      Added detonation resistance no more power.

    • @ChurchAutoTest
      @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety +2

      Definitely adds power. Especially comparing the California 91. I find non-ACN 91 is worth 1-2% on a boosted engine (depending on how hard you're pushing) and 93 is worth another 2-3% above that. So you could easily get 4-5% more power tuning 93 vs. ACN91.

    • @sixx6sixx107
      @sixx6sixx107 Před 2 lety +2

      @@ChurchAutoTest nice because here in Mississippi we don't have 91...just 87,89,& 93

    • @ChurchAutoTest
      @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety +2

      @@sixx6sixx107 You're very lucky :)

    • @ChurchAutoTest
      @ChurchAutoTest Před 2 lety +2

      @@thatturbotruck Correct, but with increased knock resistance means you can run closer to MBT, which = more power.

  • @ForneyRider
    @ForneyRider Před 2 lety +1

    Don’t many factory turbos run 1atm?

  • @BLUUCIFUR
    @BLUUCIFUR Před 2 lety +1

    Woowww Rich... That was a major question of mine... 👀👀👀👀15lbs😬😬😬... Even though I'm on E85, that's still a lot aint it... And that's also a bigger pulley your using... Is that safe for a stock bottom end.. How do we get this blower down to 10lbs???

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Před 2 lety +1

      since we made over 1500 hp on a stock bottom end (with ring gap), we are fine at this level-I dropped it down to 5 psi in the next video

    • @BLUUCIFUR
      @BLUUCIFUR Před 2 lety

      @@richardholdener1727 👀👀👀😬😬😬1500??? Daaamnnn... Bet that up Rich😁😁😁💯💯👌🏿

  • @AngryHerby
    @AngryHerby Před 3 dny +1

    Will a kenne bell fit on that adapter?!

  • @robvas
    @robvas Před 6 měsíci +1

    Richard wouldn't you expect to see more than 700hp with 14lbs of boost from an engine that made almost 450hp NA?

  • @Chris-op5bc
    @Chris-op5bc Před 10 měsíci +1

    Any thoughts on what this blower would do on a 408 ls running e85? Was talking with someone a while back about this set up and was told the blower would fall off and pretty much wouldn't do what I'm wanting

  • @matthewvarnam4302
    @matthewvarnam4302 Před 2 lety +1

    And People say you can't run boost on a engine without ring gap.