Russia's Gibka-S Air Defense System is On the Ukrainian Frontline
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 04. 2024
- In the midst of Ukraine's challenging landscape, a new chapter unfolded as Russia deployed the formidable Gibka-S air defense systems to safeguard its interests. Tensions soared on the border, and reports of a new guardian surfaced. The Tigr all-terrain infantry mobility vehicles, sent by Russia, now proudly sporting the distinctive Gibka-S missile turrets atop their armored frame. This wasn't just a deployment; it was a statement etched in metal, a promise echoing across the fields. It signaled a commitment to securing the skies in a region where uncertainties loomed like storm clouds on the horizon. However, what sets the Gibka-S air defense system apart, and what specific capabilities does it bring to the table? Stay tuned to discover more about it!
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Věda a technologie
All the people who were saying that Russia ran out of missiles were partially correct; Russia ran out of all the old soviet era missiles and replaced them with new ones.
ran out of missiles in may 2022.
I believe there waiting for france
Yes it is true 😁👍👍
Die alten muss man zuerst verbrauchen, freut euch auf die neue generation, die wird euch gefallen 😂😂😂
Rusia negara adidaya
Its amazing what Russians can make out of shovels and washing machines chips…
😊 imagine what russia could do with newage computing chips or godforbid washingmachinechips or even fridgechips😂😂😂
indeed
they made their nucks from american left over materials they are good at copies 😂😂😂
What have you made .just talking bullshit
Please correct, it’s Nazi Russia ..
No wonder why usa can't find oil in Russia 😂😂😂
???
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
😂
they could - but putin couldn´t be bought like jelzin
Keeping the system aside, the vehicle is very beautiful. Far better design than Humvee and Defender.
Looks like something relatively inexpensive to deploy.
True and the speed of deployment
gamechanger in drone warfare
😢 dont worry my usa friends😂 usa will copy this and maybe even ... no sry they maybe copy it it try a similar weaker system with only 100times the cost! Afterall most usa money comes from theft in other countries blackmail and usataxpayers😂😂😂 usa can easly pay 1 million for a missile that costs russia 100K (ex)😂😂
@@ericx8392Corect. New example is the recent Iran missile attack. USA lost 1.2 billion and Iran 200 million.
@@ericx8392 GROM, GRZMOT, PIORUN.RUSSIAN ones are DELAYED, VERY DELAYED compared to POLISH ones.AND YOU SHOOT SINGLE, YOU DON'T NEED TWO.SPZR Poprad WATCH
In modern warfare, where low altitude drones and cruise missiles play a major role on the battlefield, this equipment is of extreme importance, also for protecting middle to long range defense systems such as S-400.
Exactly. A great layer of defence.
why protect?
s400 works on paper thouth
@@fcukrealmadrid What a dumb comment. Biden thanks you for the vote
in every sector of military equipment russia has more options. which are not the same but have some overlaps. when using together, like units, there is additional bonus to that. and also because of variability of weapons systems, they are together as a whole, very capable, efficient and flexible. together with jamming, well greased command chains and implementing of ai and unmanned drones and vehicles, russia is really unbeatable at this time as defender. not talking about her enourmous vastness and resources...
@@Whateverjudy Same can be said about every missile defence system, thats why they mostly operate in groups and have crew who can reload them.
Can we take a second to admire the speed of this missile
9K333 Verba missile. With a very small warhead (1.5 kg) and a maximum range of 6.5 km. The stinger has a 3 kg warhead with a 5 km range. You see the problem there? You sacrifice something to gain something. :)
@@RealityCheck6969the missile size and range and power are interchangeable on this system what are you talking about and it's not the only system of this kind Russia has.
Both stinger and verba have the range of 8km and the stinger isnt 3kg @RealityCheck6969
@@ali-haider5788 not according to published specs :)
@@RealityCheck6969 tbh I think this is mostly a response to drones, u really don't need a whole lot of stopping power to shoot down what is basically a hobby RC plane
Bonjour , merci pour cette vidéo . J'ai énormément de respect et de gratitude envers le gouvernement de la fédération de Russie pour le fait qu'il protège son peuple et ce en inventant , et en utilisant tout ce qu'il peut pour le faire du mieux possible .
Quelle classe , vous êtes un grand peuple et vous avez la chance d'avoir un dirigeant qui non seulement a la tête sur les épaules , mais surtout qui est dans le réel , lui ; contrairement aux dirigeants du bloc occidental , qui sont à côté de leurs chaussures .
La différence de level est flagrante . Votre victoire que je souhaite de tout cœur , n'est surtout que justice .
Au revoir , bonne journée et surtout bon courage .
Un grand merci pour votre commentaire si pertinent! ❤
Russia's ballistic engineers are 20 years ahead NATO's
Calling Kinzhal a new hypersonic missile ? ...I dont think so 🤣🤣
Это правда
@@steveb890 well it is true
Russias hype is 20 years ahead of the west.
@@steveb890It's hypersonic glide vehicle
Russian military and armament, war designed, developed, and tested. I'd say this is pretty good for a country with flying shovels, built out of old washing machine chip parts.
according to western media(war propaganda)
Using only washing machines 😮
Those are some very precise and deadly shovels 😂
Same old lame old.....
hahaha
@@bramposthumus9300but still funny
@@andresausecha9553 No. Stupid and lame.
@@andresausecha9553 Yep and the joke is on the west they are losing badly and no matter what they do they will still lose a humiliating loss
Oh wait i tought Russia repaired their tanks with fridges and was about to run out of ammo?
😂
lol
The west always says and accuses Russia of what they are doing its called projection
Pretty soon these cars will be AI driven and require no human operator on the ground, minimising loss of human life further. Russia already deployed robotic tanks operated remotely without crew on the ground.
Так это уже получается и не шутка вовсе 🤔
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Robotic tanks 😂😂😂 well they should first develop a lithography machine to produce semiconductors 😂😂😂 I saw russian Robotics comparable with western robotics in 1990
@@padawan1754 You are right, but the West has shown itself to be a rich partner (due to an unlimited credit card), but an unreliable one that will promise and betray at any moment, the world sees this, who knows what will happen next with US technology
@@padawan1754 the russians have an operating ai-vehicle which can interact with its robotic friends - simple but effective - i do not see the mighty usa can equip their troops with something similar
+ drones capabilities & ressources (perhaps eeven ukraine with its "simple" fpv´s could hit us-military hard
any kinzhals in the west ?
it is a stupid failure done again by western "napoleons" to underestimate the variability of russian approaches to solve problems
Wow, I was just attempting to figure out how powerful the Gibka missile was, and the information you provided was really clear.
2 kinds of supersonic missiles down
hypersonic
This truck is a must! Anti-drone def. has become a big advantage!
This is what you get when producing for usability, and not for profit!
😂😂 yeah like the t14 or terminator 😂
the pentagon may be pissed that russian fabs outperform their glide-bombs
not to mention the downfall of 777s and probablay uncle abrams & aunt himars
it is for profit tho
@@Betz23K but russia can't win the war which they started 🤣🤣🤣 usability like the t14
@@Betz23K glide bomb because they can't build precision bomb🤣🤣
Russia got the best missiles technology on the entire planet🎉🎉
sláva BRATOM RUSKA SK❤❤🎉
Bull. You don't have the best of anything. The proof is in front of you: Ten years fighting the worl'd's 22nd largest military.
Script writer is a poet.
majestic metaphors
This is ChatGBT though...
a poet who doesnt know it. unnecessarily verbose.
A very poor one. Most of the metaphors and imagery that they use are totally inappropriate and unnecessary. Quite a lot of the time, it doesn't make any sense, presumably because the concept doesn't translate properly from whatever native language the creator speaks.
Honestly, they should go back to presenting the content cleanly and factually, as they did previously. It comes across far more professionally and is less irritating to listen to.
AI my friends lol. Y'all always make me laugh...
Looks like a bunch of MANPADs attached to a vehicle
Yes, Igla-S
The US has had the exact same thing mounted on Humvees for 30 years the Russians are always so late
@@rubenlopez3364 The Soviets had Osa decades before Humvees were designed or produced. US AD is woeful, the Iranians bombed US bases, Israeli bases and Saudi bases all with no answer from the US. The US has lost more Patriot batteries this year than its produced this year.
@@rubenlopez3364Really? US gave Ukronutzees Patriot but no not these toys?
It is
Гибка је одлична!
Wish you well Russia from Britain.
George Galloway? Is that you?
🤝🇷🇺
Gibka-S can also be fitted into patrol boats?
Хоть на велосипед
Actually, that's where it came from. Initially Gibka (without S), index 3М-47, since 2006 was mounted on warships and patrol boats.
They will soon be mounted on Geran 2 drones, for all the targets, it meets on it's way 😅
India should come like this. Simple and secure powerful
Keep dreaming
It is not that simple. Such weapons are disigned from months and years of combat experience. And with looking simplicity it is supposed to do exactly what and when it needs together with other parts of the army.
Yeah, "should" 😂
@@thfrussia6717Not to mention depending which Terrain it's best for, China border or Pakistan border,
Iran will surpass them
Waiting for it in War Thunder
What a superb channel you have, excellent, concise and unbiased. You are very knowledgeable, thanks a lot.
Like all similar systems it lacks a cheap secondary system to protect if from cheap drones in numbers...
This IS the cheap secondary systems. S-300M, Pantsir and lastly this thats 3 AD systems to get through.
The guns in all systems now days kinda outdated to shot down drones and those stuf
Yes it does have such a system. The rest of the Army, who kills the drone operators. Granted, it's not cheap, But you bring what you have. right?
@@Gunni1972 lol
yes that was exactly what I was thinking maybe a small short range laser or maybe a Gatling gun multiple barrels for self protection and then with the same guidance system it needs more self-defense because it's going to be a target for a lot of different systems
that's quite a versatile shovel
It's a needed Russian protective measure nullifying low flying threats to Russia's soldiers and equipment etc.
Looks equivalent to the US Avenger which were given to Ukraine (and all were quickly destroyed). These things need to be close to the combat line and they are very vulnerable to FPV drones.
I think this system can detect and shoot down drones.
thing is ukraine does not have an air force or attack helicopters. I really doubt the russians even uses this equipment in the current conflict. They might be effective against drones but it has to be crazy expensive to use against drones
@@leonardoorellano6652 depends on what's more expensive- the defense or the object that they are defending. Also, don't underestimate how cheaply Russia can build these...They don't just loose a billion dollars like Pentagon does...
@@leonardoorellano6652 it is not only about the price but about the tactical situation. If you can fast and fully supress enemy drones for the period of attack you get advantage and capture the territory
@@leonardoorellano6652It's Made In Russia so it's at least 20X cheaper than Made In USA where the hidden costs could be 80% of the selling price.
Commentator sounds like a salesman 😂❤
А слушатель коментатора на полного осла 😂 ну или барана 😢
Looks great, how long before another system is added that can top it?.
US : puts stinger in a humvee calls it avenger ☠️
Russia : guess we will need to make one of our own then
The Avenger is light years behind this.
@@locoman888 The first Avengers were in service 35 years ago and have been continuity upgraded. We heard S-400 was light years ahead of Patriot but then 13 Su 34/35 A-50 AWACS were shot down in 2 weeks, Storm Shadow , GMLRS and ATACMS bypass S-400 all the time and even S-400 destroy some too. Russian weapons are only light years ahead in hype.
Exactly what I thought
@@williamzk9083The propaganda cope-aid is being drunk
Igla in English is needle
I'm picturing a small guided missile 3 feet in length and 2 inches in diameter. they select the same target seconds apart and if the first hits the second looks for its alternate target. Built for slow moving drones that can overwhelm the defensive system
SPZR Poprad - a self-propelled anti-aircraft missile system of the VSHORAD class (Very Short Range Air Defense)[1], produced by PIT-RADWAR S.A. Work on the set began in 2005, and mass production began in 2015.
Only somebody who never worked in warehouse could have believed in it.
First-In-First-out is the golden rule.
Awesome, this will seriously counter the drone problem.
That missile climb @5:55 🔥
Isnt it igla manpad?
I love your narrative... Almost poetic.
Kind of Sidewinders ?! ❤ nice
Is this primarily focused on low flying Ukrainian FPV drones as a target?
If I've seen correctly, it has a built-in shovel!
Wouldn't it be more cost-efficient to create anti-drone weapons that fires high explosive shells or shrapnel? The system on the ground can calculate speed, distance etc and set a timer on the shell (speed up a mechanical fuse) before firing a volley at incoming drones? Modifying WW2 type anti-aircraft and adding electronics actually seems like a good idea to me. But I'm not a politician so what do I know?
Been saying the same thing. WW2 era weapons are very relevant in this war.
Yeah they do have 57mm autocannon air-defence vehicles with directed-blast shells in development. But the Gibka-S is something that's ready for prime-time so for now it will do.
Pantsir has that but when you're protecting an expensive S-300/400 you don't take chances with conventional shells
@@Pythoner SPZR Poprad - a self-propelled anti-aircraft missile system of the VSHORAD class (Very Short Range Air Defense)[1], produced by PIT-RADWAR S.A. Work on the set began in 2005, and mass production began in 2015.
cruise missiles, drones..... and A-10..no cover for the ground troops like they have in the Middle East. This system is a lot better than just shoulder mount. Not need to carry by a solder, can reload on the field where the missiles can just store inside the truck. Can relocate a lot faster than a ground troop. For the look of it, I think they can charge the max load from 4 to 8 very easily, just stack 4 more on the top.
It's EXACTLY the same as shoulder mounted. It's just 4 of them, not 1. They do have impressive range and altitude though.
@@Gunni1972 They are not "carry" by soldier and shoot by mounting on a soldier is what I meant "shoulder mount". Hand carry equipment in an open battle field is always avoided if possible. Only benefit of soldier carrying is avoid detention.
You really poeted throughout the whole video 🔥🔥🔥
But the Tunguska is the dedicated system for this purpose
im sure its mainly geared to anti drone mission drones are the most deadly thing on the battlefield in modern war
Such dramatic, as in drama, words for a weapon , has that colorful and distinct flare , like saying, " I am here , notice me ! "
Just like all those patriot defence systems USA send to Ukraine, disappear like ghost , wonder who is ordering those super weapons now that the world see them been destroyed by old fridges and shovels by Russia ?
Much better than Arrow-2 and the Iron Dome guided by the infrared only AN-TPY X Band Radar
We've been dealing with this Tech for years, nothing new!
They need to send those to Lebanon and Syria
4 Grails and a marine radar...wow
Is that a shovel attached as a bayonet
keep up the hard work
It is not commented, if the system is capable to take down cruise missiles. Fighter jets will not approach less than 30 km to the contact line.
OK so is it a kinetic or explosive device? You didn't say.
"Not Russia but apply pressure to Ur Cranium" J Cole - First person shooter
Well, time will tell, so the short range Gibka are susceptible to air to ground long range missiles attack.
damn shovels
Shovels are finished !!
Just rakes are left
Yeah it’s really doing well guarding there oil refinery’s
Looks like Igla-S mounted on a launcher.....
Chat GPT.. A lot of words for saying that you have mounted 4 iglas on a tigr. 😄
6:13 This reminds me of the movie 'The Fifth Element'
i mute the sound....
Dude really put some MANPADs on a truck and called it an Air Defense system 🤣🤣🤣🤣
USA did that with their Humvees for 25 years or so. What's the problem?
@Gunni1972 they're manpads, not high end air defense
@@froggywamU.S did as well, what's your pont you clown?
These are small, effective and would be an asset to protect the Crimea bridge against small, slow and low flying drone attacks.
Love the mobile, lower cost platform
A simplified, more mobile version of the SA-13 Gopher. Useful but not a game changer.
in this configuration it is not really a game changer if it would carry 24 missiles it would become interesting and if they have 50 missiles on backup then it becomes a game changer with good guidance
Looks like the Russian igla manual quickly stuck together to make this...😅
It's been around for about 10 years
That is sick!!!
Our lot are Asylum residents, having created this problem.
such a rather big vehicle with only 8 missiles? especially when they are basically just taped on there...
yes I kind of agree with you. that's not enough missiles. they should start with something like 18 to 24 immediately usable missiles. and something like 50 on standby and 100 in reserve. then you have a system that is usable.
Wow, Russian is not a big mouth. They work, not just talking here and there like Uncle Rambo
Russia thought the world was still that behind to fight with spears, arrows and bows. They were taught a lesson and now you can see.
Russia carries nuclear missiles and a shipping container and could park 20 miles off of the West Coast East Coast or that southern shores of the United States of America and we wouldn’t even know the difference…. these are terrifying times.😰😰😰
It let a single engine Cessna get through.
Sales pitch?
It's mobile and that makes it even deadlier!
reminds me of the 1970s soviet manpads mounted on their APcvs, that looked futuristic but was kinda junk, but not reallyc uzin areal war theyd be deadly, and amazing how cheap they can make it, just looks weirdhow its just hanging on the top of the car bouncin around,. all the mechanical stuff stickingout, seenms like it should have some case to surround it maybe
Is has to to stay ahead of the game
Для нее хорошо бы ракету подешевле сделать против Дронов. А то одной ракетой и вертолеты и мавики сбивать слишком дорого получается.
Strela-10 is actualy the same
60-90km range on those
Lots of talk.....is it used to knock drones out, with an inexpensive rocket?
2:58 I can clearly see a Russian shovel on the roof
Russia using flying high tech shovels😂
Excelentísimo video.
Did you notice a shovel between the rockets? 0:06 🤣
This is an AI reading a bunch of random words that it doesn't understand
Skynet is awake
Russia Engineers should make a similar system for enemy tanks & IFVs. Equip it with 4-6 Konkur M ATGMs.
good
Analogue of the Strela-10M air defense system...
Adding a machine gun for close support would make this machine a very effective weapon platform. Thanks for uploads.
Nice
Russia now has the most technologically advanced military on Earth haha
“Ukraine military power. Get em boys” lol
Gonne be a top sneller!!!
nice
More targets for ATACMS?
yes there is no logic to what you are saying. you want to use a system 100 times more expensive against a system that is almost throw away. there is no logic. if you want to destroy something like this system. you use the cheapest system you have. and that's a drone. and you just send 10 of them. it only has eight missiles it cannot reload quick enough and you kill it.
@@andrestapert7830 I didn't mean to destroy this vehicle, but the site that the vehicle protects. Sorry I was lazy to explain.
Don't worry About It My Friend and Thank you very much for your response I really appreciated but for me It is very simple If I have a protection system Around Me It needs to be able to do it Job and 8 Rockets is not Enough you need at least 24 missiles to protect yourself 50 Ready to backup and 100 in reserve
I wonder why Russia is developping such equipment, knowing it has pantsir s1 and thor systems wich are operation on the same level (low and very low targets)