M50 Lens Review: If I could only have one lens for the Canon M50, this would be the one.
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- ⭐️ Viltrox 23mm f1.4 - geni.us/hqeA
Canon M50 Mark II (good price) - geni.us/TyF8G
RECOMENDED M50 ACCESSORIES:
Cage - geni.us/YTee
Tripod - geni.us/uzJmsNp
Mini Tripod - geni.us/05zG
Camera Strap - geni.us/OLTYQc
Microphone - geni.us/3u4VBN
Wireless microphone - geni.us/SpRqnAt
Screen Protector - geni.us/ovmdA
Lens Protector (UV Filter) - geni.us/JFJQ2
My Studio Microphone - geni.us/0rN8FO
Best Camera Bag - geni.us/V1k0
Best Gimbal - geni.us/gBjBx
RECOMENDED EF-M LENSES:
Best Cinematic and low light VLOG lens - geni.us/impB0l
Best Stabilised VLOG Lens - geni.us/D8pK
Best Budget VLOG, Astro, landscape, Real Estate Lens - geni.us/N0p1n
Best Cinematic and low light Prime Lens - geni.us/lXDOMUK
Best Portrait Lens - geni.us/AInBWVB
Best all around video Lens (buy used, cheap!) - ebay.us/QdZv99
Best Telephoto Lens - geni.us/bsXiKSD
RECOMENDED LENS ADAPTERS:
Affordable EF Lens adapter (you need this) - geni.us/VsOp
EF Adapter with variable ND Filter - geni.us/ahPmsoF
* Links may be affiliate links, I might earn a small commission, but you will pay no extra.
Been traveling around Korea with this lens on a m6ii it’s been fantastic! Had some issues with focus when using older 3rd party batteries but with canon batteries it’s superb
Good to hear.
I have Viltrox 23, 33 and 56 for my M50. I've been waiting for 13 but it looks like Viltrox won't make it. This trio is great to use on the gimbal because all 3 lenses are identical in size so I can change them on the gimbal without rebalancing. Little difference in weight I compesate with a couple of rings. I'm very satisfied with this setup. If Viltrox made 13 it will be wonderful.
I know, I have the 13mm on Fuji and it’s such a great lens, I do hope to they release it for EF-M.
Is there a 56mm for the ef-m ??
@@luismanuelmendoza789 Yes
Anazing lens-selection as far as i can tell. What gimbal do you use?
@@jenslemke9279 Weebill-S with Portkeys PT5 monitor on it.
Viltrox and similar companies can save APS C imo. Esp for amateurs and hobbyists
Let’s hope.
I held off buying this lens for a long time, but finally made the plunge last week with a reasonably priced used used copy. 23mm is my sweet spot focal length for railroad video, and really wanted the f1.4 for night video. I had been using the Sigma 16mm f1.4 which is an outstanding lens, but it is heavier and bulky and just a bit wider than I really want for a lot of images and video. I had held off on the Viltrox 23 for so long as many reviews show soft corners with the overall conclusion being the Canon 22mm f2 seemed sharper. HOWEVER - now that I have used the lens and processed a number of videos and photos --- I believe the Viltrox 23mm f1.4 to be superior optically overall than the Canon EF-M 22mm f2. Part of the problem reviewers have I think is the lack of good lens corrections for the Viltrox --- my favorite DxO Photolab 6 doesn't even have corrections for it. However, I've gotten very good at dialing in corrections for vintage and other lenses that don't have predefined corrections --- and once fully corrected, I am actually getting overall richer and sharper images from the Viltrox than I can get from the Canon 22 at the same apertures, even if I try very hard to tweak the Canon images with custom settings! The Canon has noticeably more vignetting at its max aperture of f2 than the Viltrox has at f2 --- degrading the corners in a way that's noticeable. I bought this lens on the strong recommendation Mark gave it --- and the trust I place in his judgement. With every lens and gadget I've bought that he's touted as having special qualities - I've found time after time I have to agree with him. This lens is no different -- and part of what sets it apart from others is the slightly richer 'filmic' look it gives. The colors it produces do match Canon EF-M lenses well --- but there is some extra 'ethereal quality' to this lens' images that set it apart. The Canon 22mm f2 images are very, very good - but next to the Viltrox 23's images of the same subject taken at the same time, the Viltrox images just have some X factor that makes them better. Thank you Mark for another excellent recommendation!
This is a phenomenal comment. Thank you for your insight. I have a few questions for you. How are lense corrections done? In camera or in post-production? How do you do yours?
Also, I prefer the Canon 22mm's more compact size compared to the Viltrox - would you say that the Canon lense is still a great choice, even if the Viltrox has something extra to it? I'm choosing my first prime lens so I'd love some advice.
@@Oleg_K. Since the lens has no electronic connection with the camera, it isn't possible to do in-camera corrections for it. I do them in post-processing using DxO PhotoLab 6. The Canon lens optically isn't much different, and it is less expensive and smaller, so it'a also a great choice. I do a lot of very low light photography at night, and the extra stop that the Viltrox gives me is of great value. I also prefer the way it renders images and colors, they seem to be just a bit more punchy than the Canon lens.
@@tampatrainguy8486 I'll have to look into DxO Photolab 6 and lense corrections. I'm also quite happy to hear that the Canon lense is a good choice though the Viltrox has obvious pros. Thanks.
Buying the used viltrox 23mm lately, bring it to some couple graduation photoshoot, and I'm dissapointed :(. Once I tried the 22mm F2.0 EFM, the viltrox feels way moore harder to focus and the vignette was quite noticeable especially on wider aperture. Recently sold the 23mm viltrox and bought the used 22mm F2.0. Totally worth every penny, especially considering the price, picture quality, focus, and overall footprint. Anyway, good review!
I have the 56mm 1.4 from viltrox, it's incredible. They know how to make a stellar lens for the budget conscious.
Yeah, pretty hard to beat.
Any other nice budget primes for the m50?
@@brohemian pretty sure Mark has covered most in his videos.
Adapted manual lenses are cheap and plentiful and can yield some fantastic results.
Love your reviews!! I have the M50 Mk II and have purchased most of your suggested accesories and lenses. Love them all and they work exactly as described. The only option I purchased that you didn't suggest is the SmallRig -Universal Aluminum NATO Side Handle Grip. I have BIG hands and this accessory really helps with my grip on the camera with the SmallRig cage.
Okay, Okay! I'll order it! Starting to learn on my m50 Mark ii. It's a nice little camera and now I want to try different things with it. I just ordered the 23mm and also the 56mm (after watching the other video).
No no no Mark. I already bought so many equipment because of your videos I not going to buy this one. I want to really thank you for all your videos that helped me to buy the right stuff for the m50 mark 2 I have now. I'm being in a very bad situation in life where dead is very close, your videos keep me going. Thank you Mark, truly.
I’m so sorry to hear that, I hope you can enjoy every moment.
The 23mm was the first one I bought. Can confirm. Good lens. I use that and my Viltrox 56mm more than anything.
Yea, I think that a great prime lens combo, that what I have too.
Picked one up for the M6MKII several months ago on your recommendation, it has served me extremely well. Tied for favorite with the Canon 32mm
Yeah, I find that the 32mm has superior image quality, but the 23mm is superior in versatility, you might be feeling the same.
Wow, that lens is about 4 times the size of the Canon 22mm F/2! That 22mm is by far the best lens Canon made for EF-M, I think. I've never seen or tried the 32mm prime, but it would be hard to beat.
Thanks for continuing to providing videos for the M mount system. I have been getting weary about continuing to get M mount lenses I do have regular and speed-booster adapters this video helps especially the video clips
Thanks for your kind words.
when i did my "if i could only keep one of my prime lenses" scenario a few moths ago i got it down to two, the efm 32mm ƒ1.4 and the vintage pentacon 50mm ƒ1.8, never really could split them
yes the efm lens as the fast focusing AF and razor sharp optics but that 50mm pentacon that only cost me £30..........its images just make me smile every time, and don't think i don't have great glass in primes, like the sigma 105mm ƒ1.4 and sigma 56mm ƒ1.4
in the end they both got beaten by the winner of the zooms, just can't len my sigma 100-400mm go, its wildlife i came into it for and this lens does it so well in a light weight compact size,
as for the efm lenses, the 18-150mm is a real good lens, i wouldnt be too sad if i only had that one either
100-400 is a super cool range on APS-C, I have fujifilm 100-400, and at 400 the images are soo unique due to the massive image compression.
I was just thinking about this lens for my M50 (and I hope to get the M6 MKII soon also), and just had to re-look at this video to remind me why this lens will rock for me. Just ordered it from Amazon. Thanks again, Mark!!
I think you will love it!
@@markwiemels Thanks, Mark! I do love it! It is a wonderful lens.
What’s the name of the lanes plz
@@derrickhurley1782 Viltrox 23mm f1.4 The link to purchase this lens is in the description.
I have a Rokinon 24mm on a Viltrox Speed Booster and it's a great focal length.
That would be a great combo.
I have def been considering getting this to pair with my Sigma 16. Thanks for this push
For me, that’s pretty much the cover all prime lens pair.
Having watched all of your reviews, I have now bought this as my first prime lens! Exciting 😊 being new to this, I've got two questions:
- When would you use the A setting on the aperture ring?
- in video mode, is it normal that it picks up a focussing noise on the audio (which I can also slightly hear in a quiet environment coming from the lens) when using camera mic or an on camera shotgun mic? Thanks Mark for your help👍
I never use the A setting, but in any of the auto modes you can. I use an on-camera shotgun mic, I don't notice any noise, maybe you would if using the internal mics.
@Mark Wiemels thanks for the info. I tested it with and without a Rode shotgun and can hear the focus noise on the video recording (especially if no one is talking over the top). Could it be that I got a bad copy of the lens?
Have done some more testing and realised I can only hear the autofocus in very quiet environments. Filmed my friend's birthday celebrations and turned out beautifully, even with the built in mic!
Great to hear! Sometimes these things are more noticeable in ‘testing’ than they are in real world use. So glad it’s working for you, the images it produces really are beautiful.
That’s why the 22/2 OG is so cool as it is inconspicuous. But I must agree, the viltrox primes 23/33/56 do have character. Sadly it does not come in black to be unobtrusive.
Yah. The silver thing is a bit annoying.
I like this lens. Even though I have the 16mm Sigma f1.4, I'd like to sample this Viltrox, but I can't find anyone selling it atm and new price of $400 CAD + tax makes me want to wait and be patient for a deal
I found the Vit 23mm too big for discrete photography. With digital cameras we can push ISO equivalence to 800 and then the canon 22mm becomes a good enough option. It’s far more discrete and almost no one notices a M50/22 combo even in museums (National Gallery, Wallace Collection, etc) where security can get a bit worried.
I would agree with this, plus the Viltrox is bright silver.
Hi Mark! as always I'm ever so grateful for the content you share. What is your recommendation for youTube videos for craft-style and How-To's. Example for people who create cooking content, or hobby painting; scenarios where the focus subject is about 3-feet from the camera and the table/working stage is about a 26" x 26" work-space. I'd love to see a lense comparison on this subject. Example, the 15-45mm-Kit lens vs 22mm vs Rokinon 12mm or any other lens you think is a better tool for the situation. Thank you again for the knowledge you generously share!
Your best best is it use the kit lens to test different focal lengths, to find what works for you. There really is not best lens or one size fits all for this, it’s more about finding your focal length. Once you work that out, then you look at prime/fixed lenses at that focal length.
@@markwiemels That's interesting! What would the benefit be to switch to the Prime lens? The kit lens gives me a wider stage when doing table work at max, 45mm, then I change the focus when I transition to my sewing machine... 24mm to get a slightly closer view point when sewing... Trying to learn how this stuff works 🙂You have been great at getting me this far and I look at your content almost daily to learn more. Thank you!
Primarily being able to shoot at lower ISO, so a clearer image, it also may be sharper. Having said that, I think the kit lens, with they versatility, often can be better than using a prime, for the reasons you have outlined. I would honestly focus on lighting the video well, before buying another lens.
I'd have to humbly disagree. Size matters to the EF-M system. It's the 22 mm F2 STM all the way for me. For me the kitlens is the most important lens. Then the 32 mm F/1.4. Then the 22 mm F2
after buying a couple lenses, the best lens I've bought for the M50 is the 24-105mm f4 paired with the viltrox speedbooster which brings it down to f2.8
How's the focusing performance
Yes, that would be a great setup.
Look great especially in low light ✨ 💯👌🏻👌🏻
For sure.
What would you go with first this Viltrox or the 16mm sigma f1.4?
I have a new-to-me EF mount Sigma 1.8 18-35mm and a EF to EF-M converter ring from my 90D I’m going to try on my M50 to see how it works out. Any thoughts or ideas of things to look out for compared to the lenses you talk about here?
Thank you for sharing this!
Hi! Mark
Thanks for the explicative video about this lense.
I want to tell you my TTArtisan 50mm f1.2 arrives today and I would love to see what you can do with the trio of TT or with the f.95. They’re all manual but as far I read they’re good quality-price if you looking into the manual boundaries.
I realize TT have like a tester for content for people like you, maybe you can ask for copies and get it so the folks can know a bit more about those lenses, would love to see it.
Hoping the best for you and your family
Be safe.
Thanks, yes, I should have those lenses sent out sometime soon.
I just wanted to ask why not 70-200 if that gives maximum amount of blur and also a versatile lens serving all purpose and needs!
Which lens would you prefer in the range 30-35mm?
I really struggled between buying the Viltrox 23mm vs. the Canon 22mm for use on my M5.
I wanted the one stop larger f/1.4 aperture the Viltrox offered (vs the Canon lens' f/2), but I planned to primarily use for street photography and didn't want a silver lens that might draw attention. The Canon is a much more compact and discrete lens.
Something I disliked about the Canon is the absolutely silly "lens hood" they offer for it. If you need a laugh, look it up.
Neither lens has an imprinted focusing scale, which would have been nice... But, oh well. I'll just have to rely on the AF! Note: The Canon lens' manual focus ring is so small, it can be hard to find by touch, while keeping your eye on the subject in the viewfinder.
Ultimately I ended up buying the Canon lens simply because they offered it on sale refurbished at a great price. I was able to get a "generic" vented metal lens hood for it that's much better than the Canon, though it nearly doubled the length of the lens (I leave the hood on all the time and cap it instead of the lens). I do like the Canon 22mm... But still wish Viltrox had offered their 23mm in a more discrete black (same with their 56mm... I got the Sigma instead).
Thanks for the interesting review! I'll be looking for your other EF-M mount lens reviews! I should note that I am a stills photographer, not doing video... At least not yet.
P.S. Too bad Viltrox is unlikely to offer their new 13mm for the Canon M-series, although it's understandable in light of other factors. I'm using a manual focus 12mm that is a bit slower to shoot with, but does surprisingly well consider its low cost.
Yes, I would love to see the Viltrox 13mm on EF-M, I think they found that they were just not selling enough EF-M lenses to bother with it.
But does it come in black? Great video and great channel. Keep up the great videos. I just bought my m50 mkii with the kit lens. So looking to buy this. I love landscapes, abstract shapes, and macro.
No, no black. That annoyed me a little at first too, but I have gotten over it.
my camera bag got sigma 56mm 1.4, canon 22mm, and 55-200mm.
what you recommend for low range between 22 and 56mm.
thanks
Hi Mark, great video! When using this lens for video what is your favorite what mode do shoot in (1080p - 25fps)? And have you ever used the viltrox mount that allows for fuller frame 4k? Thank you!
I always shoot in 1080 25 or 50fps. The 4k mode has a lot of issues, and I don’t use it.
I was thinking of getting the 22mm f2 EF-M lens for the blurry background since I film food at restaurants... is this better than 22mm f2 EF-M lens?
The 22mm is smaller, and a little cheaper. The Viltrox 23mm gives a more blurry background, and is better in low light. If the size and a little extra cost are not a concern, then I would choose the Viltrox.
@@markwiemels after watching comparison of photos & videos between the 2 lenses, I will stick with 22mm f2 Canon lens 😀
The colors look better and sharper, Viltrox has a slight purple tint to it
@@SilentTrip I’m big fan of that 22mm, great lens. I have both and use the 22mm when I want to be inconspicuous, with its very small size.
Hello! I am shooting videos for my kids Metal Rock Shows. I have been using a cannon m50 mk2 a stationary camera which shoot the whole band then I use a zoom camera for the drummer and my Iphone for mobile video. What kind of lense should i use on my cannon camera for shooting videos from a far like a balcony or from the back of a crowd. These are all usually low light or stage light dependant situations? appreciate comments in advance. Thanks!
I'm getting the EF-M 32mm f/1.4 & the 55 to 200 telephoto for my M50 MKII
Both great lenses.
i have both of those. i love the 32mm, but have only recently taken the 55-200 off the shelf & am trying to get to grips with it!
@@zenarobinson3851 I feel like the 32mm would be the perfect prime for me espedially with that f/1.4 and also because it's the EF-M. Let me know how it goes once you get into the groove of using the 55 to 200.
@@juleztv3372 i feel i might be giving up the 55-200!! i'll see!
Thanks so much!
Been ready to upgrade lense(s) for my M50 but torn between a prime f1.4 like this one or a zoom 1.4 or 2.8
Also, with the crop factor of the M50 (1.6x) would this 23mm essentially be turned into a 37mm?
Can you make a video cannon m50 mark ii with a 35mm f1.4? Please
what about for talking head videos or recipe stills? Viltrox 23mm, Sigma 18mm, or Cannon 23 pancake?
If I can only have one I'll keep the 18-150. I'd rather have the versatility than the 1.4 aperture. On the other hand, if I was only allowed one lens I wouldn't buy an interchangeable lens camera.
Good choice. Also good point.
I find myself dragging around my 22mm f/2, 32 mm f/1.4, 56mm f/1.4 traveling and using my 18-150 for everything instead. It I could get a native short, fast zoom of 16-55ish at f/2 or f/2.8 and it wasn't a tank I'd pay anything they asked. I don't mind choosing the right prime in the studio but I despise carrying and changing lenses while on the go.
I'd kind of like Sigma to bring their new 18-50 2.8 out in the EF-M mount but it zooms from not quite wide enough to not quite long enough. Given the lack of alternatives, I'd almost certainly buy one anyway.
@@robp2545 Tamron does a 17-70 f2.8 that looks great too.
but only for Sony and Fuji at the moment.
I have the mark 1 . Was thinking of upgrading to mark 2 . What are the differences that really matter . Or should I stay with the mark 1 ? Will this lense work on the mark 1 ? Keep in mind that I’m a beginner and not too into photography but would love to create beautiful images of memories. Ty
Stick with your mark 1 I have the same one there is not much different it just small upgrades that you could spend on a lens instead. Get better with the make 1 then you can upgrade to a r10 or r50. this is what I will be doing in the future or you can switch to Sony if that’s something you’re interested in doing in the future as well
@@OhNoBranchy Ty !!!
Thank you for sharing!! Your video made me buy the lens 😊 I first put it on my canon m50 mark ii, but it does not zoom in. Is that normal? Or does it have a zoom in feature?
I cover this I’m the video, watch it again, it will make sense. No, it does not zoom, lenses like this, that give blurry backgrounds and are good for low light, do not zoom.
Just rewatched it!! Makes so much sense, thank you 🙏
What's the best ND filter for this? Any recommendations?
Thanks for the great content!
I have been thinking to buy a Viltrox lenses for my M50, but till now I could not find any lens profiles for Viltrox that I could import to LR.
Do the Viltrox lenses cause heavy vignetting or distortion?
I have not had any issues. Any vignette is easy to correct without a lens profile. You don’t really need a lens profile to get good results.
Wow, I need to save or set aside the bucks for this lens! Thanks for the info!
It’s a super lens, but in the meantime, work on your camera and composition skills, these cost nothing and will make a huge difference.
Is there an equivalent lens to this made by Canon themselves?
Complete beginner here, very confused still.
I have the 22mm f 2.0 from Canon, i really do enjoy that lens.
Except the f 1.4 aperture (which i guess it's a big difference), does that 1mm change much from my lens? Thanks!
No, the 1 mm doesn't change much, and that 22mm is a great lens, the f1.4 gets a more blurry background and better low light photo and video, but the 22mm lens is still great, just not quite as good at those two things.
Hi Mark. I can't decide if I wanna go with Canon 22mm or this Viltrox.. Size is not the main deciding factor. So in that case is viltrox better?
I prefer the Viltrox, for the f1.4, better low light, and better ability to blur the background.
@@markwiemels I just ordered Viltrox 23mm :) What do you think about Viltrox 33mm and 56mm for Canon M6 MarkII?
@@vilgespainting that are all good, and hard to beat for the price. If you have the 23mm, I would go for the 56mm next.
What do u think about sharpness if we compare the kit 15-45 lens to canon 22mm. In indoors with low light, there's lot of grains with the kit lens, is it better with 22mm?
22 will be way better.
Love your videos, you've really helped me learn more about my Canon M50 mark ii. Is there a way to record video on this camera in portrait orientation? I'm trying my hand at YT shorts but I seem to have to rotate the video 90 degrees in post because it comes out sideways. I haven't figured it out.
No, have to rotate in editing.
Oh, sorry, the mark ii should allow vertical video, but I’m not sure how either. The original m50 doesn’t do vertical, from memory that was an added feature in the mark ii.
@@markwiemels thank you. Your videos are always awesome!
@@markwiemels I got it sorted. You can go into the playback menu and tap down to "Change mov rotate info" Then you can toggle through with the little arrow to decide which way is "up" when you send the video to your phone or computer. It's not super intuitive, but if you play around with it enough, you'll figure it out.
Will this shoot Aperture Priority video mode on a M100 as well? I’m still shooting an M100 in 2023.
Yes.
how does this one compare to the Canon EF-M 32mm?
Hi mark..i watch lots of ur video about canon m50..i have m50 mark 2..but still undecided what lens im gonna buy..i want a great lens for only vacation purpose..with good wide angle and zoom..hope u help me out for choosing lens that i need..
18-150mm suits your needs. If you want with a little bit wider get the 11-22mm
Hi, Mark new subscriber here. Im Imchen from Nagaland, India 😊 . Im totally new with camera. i have Canon M50 mark ii. Can you please suggest me a good lens, i want to take good photos and videos on my best friend wedding. Thank you
Is this lens comparable to M50 Markll mirror less camera?
How about Sigma 15-35mm...you once gave that an "if only one" lens and I went for that!
Actually, the 18-35 is the better lens, if you are ok with the size.
Something I still can't wrap my head around is the terminology between crop and full frame sensors. This is a 37mm full frame equivalent right? Or is it actually 23mm because it's designed for APS-C lenses? Like it seems obvious like "yea it's a 37mm full frame equivalent" then why call it 23mm at all if you don't get 23mm out of it? Or do you? I'm just confused
I wouldn’t worry about all this, it actually only matters if you have had full frame for many years, and know what focal lengths you like, or need to use in specific situations. Otherwise these conversions are meaningless.
How does other users find this lens compared to the Sigma 30mm in terms of general all round use? I'm not s photographer but take photos around the office, people objects etc for blog, social media posts and photos on our webiste?
23mm is a more versatile focal length.
I just got this for my M50. I have noticed what seems like its "hunting" for exposure when it's set to 1.4 and to 16. if I turn it to say 2.2 it works fine, or if i have something to focus on at 1.4. Is this a software update issue? or do I have something else going on?
I would update the firmware, see if that fixes it.
@@markwiemels I did try that, and it doesn't act like how it does in your "how to update" video. Also it looks like it has the most recent one on there. Do I need to manually do every version on it? or does the newest cover all of the previous revisions?
@@markwiemels It seems focus related almost. When I change to 2.2 its fine. OR if i manual focus it's also fine.
Thanks for your video. Can I use this on a canon 90D?
Unfortunately not
Will you do an video on M50 vs R10/R7 at some point?
Probably.
So it's competitor is the 22mm f/2 pancake lens? Except it's wider aperature.
Basically, yes.
Can you use with your speed booster for the m50? Sorry if dumb question, really new 2 this
No, that only works when adapting EF lenses, this is EF-M, which is the native mount.
Okay, I think many of us would like to know ... for shooting for youtube, would you choose the 16 mm sigma or this one? Thanks for the review. FYI, I want you to get the affiliate link, but it looks like your amazon link is not working. "Currently unavailable."
Okay I see in your older video that you rec/ it over the sigma. czcams.com/video/58LRV9mW8O8/video.html. Thanks.
I would probably pick the sigma 18-35mm with adapter.
Hey @markwiemels I was having trouble finding a lens filter (protector) that doesn't interfere taking on and off the hood for this lens. Any suggestions? thank you.
I have the cheap Hoya filters on mine. I prefer the K&F filters now, but I don’t have any in that size to test for you and let you know.
Do you find the Viltrox 23/1.4 heavy when paired with the M50 as compared with the dinky EFM 22/2?
Yes, it’s lighter than it looks, but noticeably heavier than the 22mm. Before I had the Viltrox, the 22mm was my favourite lens.
How does it compare with the nifty fifty using the viltrox speed booster?
The Viltrox is significantly shaper, and a wider field of view. The images with the nifty 50 and the speed booster can be interesting, and fun, but the actual image quality is pretty poor with major distortion and soft images wide open. I still like the dreamy quality of the 50 and the speed booster, but technically it's not great.
What software would you recommend for upscaling 1080p to 4k video?
I just do it in FinalCut Pro, there may be better, or cheaper, solutions out there.
I have a question. I’ve been having a my M50 for about a year now and am looking to get some better glass on my camera that isn’t too expensive. Im looking for either an M mount or EF mount lens for canon that’s somewhere in the focal range of 24-70mm or 18-55mm and an aperture of F 2.8 or higher. My price range is anything under like $600 or $700. What do you think a good lens for me is?
I would look at some L series EF zoom lenses, used, and adapt them.
@@markwiemels Yeah my 2 top picks rn are the EF L 24-70 2.8 and the EF L 24-105 4.0 but those lenses are like $1100 new and $900 used so that's way out of my budget. I already have an EF to EF-M adapter so those would be amazing but again, too much $$$ haha. Just looking for something like those lenses but maybe in the $400-$700 range. Thanks for the response
@@markwiemels Actually I just checked and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 II IS L USM is actually cheaper than I thought. It's about $600 used. Do you think that that lens will have any troubles adapting to the Canon M50?
@@YTBrickBuilds Should be a good setup. Can't see any real issues.
@@markwiemels Alright thanks. I think that might be what I'll go with
I have to stop watching your videos, I keep having to buy a new lens for my M50 lol. Kidding, thanks for the great reviews
Thanks! Sorry, not Sorry. ;-)
Hey Mark how would you rate this lens against the sigma 30mm 1.4
I prefer this one.
Hello Mark , i have the canon m50 mark 2 with the viltrox speedbooster M2 for my 35mm and 50mm lenses. Now after watching your informative video on the zhiyun M3 i had a huge doubt to solve . will the gimbal support the added weight of my lens adapter and lense (i.e viltorx adapter + 50mm/35mm lens) . If you or anyone can help me it would be majorly helpful
I'm not sure, but I suspect it will be borderline.
@@markwiemels so i did check one video of yours with the sigma 16mm and and Zhiyun m3 and it does seem to work so hopeful for the best...
@@markwiemels if you do get any info on this do let me know, and definitely looking forward to more of your videos XD
What about for filming or cinematic?
Yes, very good.
Hi! Just clarifying this is compatible with the mirrorless camera Canon M50, right?
Yea, be sure to get the eos-m or ef-m model of the lens, that just means it works on the m50.
hey mark is the Samyang 35mm T1.5 VDSLR MK2 Lens for Canon EF any good if you are beginner for sharp street photography?
I have not tried that one, but I have never been disappointed in a Samyang lens.
@@markwiemels Alright thanx bro
I wanna get an m50 so Bad with a prime lens but I think I wanna upgrade later and thats My dilema so I also want to get a Lumix g9 for that reason so can I get some help?
The Lumix is a great camera, if you are ok with micro 4/3, it's a lot of camera for the money.
what about Sigma Art 18-35 f/1.8?
Yes, that's my other top pick. The 18-35mm is probably the best lens ever made, and I choose it when the size and weight, of that lens, don't cause me any issues, but I wouldn't go hiking with it.
I bought the vitrox 33mm and its making some kind noise and it keep trying to focus and i cant even use the screen to adjust the setting. How do i fix this?
I have not had that issue, but the first thing I would do is update the firmware on the lens.
Would this make a good walk around lens?
Yes, it’s perfect for that.
Would this lens be good for cinematic films or short films?
Yes, it’s perfect for that.
Is this lens not stabilized? How do you keep the image steady while filming?
No it is not, you can use digital, or just camera technique.
any parfocal lenses recomended for the m50 ?
Par-focal only effects zoom lenses.
Just bought this lens but mine has bad vignetting wide open..only using for photography..
Most fast primes do, the canon native lenses get corrected in camera, 3rd party lenses need to be corrected in editing, which is pretty simple. I actually like the vignette and just leave it most of the time, and compared to other lenses the vignette is really not that strong.
So Mark does this just fit on the M50 or do you need adapter? Greets.
Fits M50, not adapter, you want the EF-M or EOS-M Canon version.
@@markwiemels I have a EF-M mount. I love the M50 but there aren't that much lenses. I would love to have a zoomlens with F2.8 but can't find it for this mount. So you really got me going for this lens. Like to try it. Thanks for the quick response btw.
How can I get from Bangladesh?
Mark can I use this camera for street photography and portraits?
Absolutely! I do, I will make a video about it soon.
I find my 22mm Canon too long as I take photos of buildings. 18 is probably as long as I can go for my sort of photos. If you're taking photos of things IN the street then 22/23 might be fine. If you want the street or buildings then maybe not.
What about on the M6 MkII?
Yes, same choice.
It's so close to the 22mm specs - is it really that much of a difference? Is the 1.4f vs 2f quite noticeable? Any other winning features over the 22?
If you already own the 22mm, unless you are desperate for the extra background blur, and low light performance, I would stick with the 22mm and invest in a prime lines of a different focal length, maybe the 56mm Viltrox.
@@markwiemels Good idea! Right now I have the sigma 16mm, cannon 22mm, the kit 14-45mm (I think), the 18-150mm, and an ef w/ adapter 40mm. I think the 56mm would be nice and I could also use a good telephoto one that goes beyond 150mm. I found the 18-150mm a bit limiting in image quality - especially at its 150mm limit.
What about the canon "Pancake" lens 22mm f2?????????????
That’s a great lens, the Viltrox is better in low light and gives a more blurry background, but I also love the 22mm canon lens, plus it’s smaller and less expensive.
hi noob here, what kind of lens should i get if i dont want background blur
Any lens, just set the aperture to f8 to f11.
@@markwiemels thank you
ef-m 32 1.4 loses cause of the focal lenght i suppose
Yes, that is why. Keeping in mind this is only my opinion, I’m sure there are others that would pick the 32mm, and I would not dispute that choice at all, it’s a magic lens.
Will this work well with the canon m5?
Yes
We want the 13mm F1.4 for EFM
Unfortunately, I have been in touch with Viltorx and they have no plans to release the lens on EF-M mount.
i LIKED VERY MUCH YOUR PRESENTATION BUT YES BUT, MY MAIN INTEREST IS VIDEO, CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME IN THAT AREA. GRACIAS ALBERTO
Will try to get some new videos out soon.
Did you film this video with the lens?
Not the talking head part.
I wish i didn't stumble upon this video. Now i have to save up money again for this lens. T_T
33mm more great for potrait
I prefer the 56 for portraits, but the 33 is good too.