Isn't the ostracism mutual? On the one hand, cancel culture ostracises LGBT issues and those who are not against it. On the other hand, those who are uncomfortable with LGBT and openly decries it are also ostracised for not keeping in their angst. One cause might be the imbalance of social constructs, like LGBT and its associations to sensitive matters, and the lack of scientific based knowledge of diversity of sexuality. Between the biological opposites of male and female traits lies a diverse degree of combinations. Not all like to study science and not all like to engage in language-dependent discourse. Both balances out each other out over time measured in ages longer than 1 life-time. Those who expect instant gratification might not be aware that the gratification is instantaneous. Narcissism is most rave and has to be identified - you as a member of society, are not at the centre of issues in society regardless of gender.
Viswa has the uncanny ability to ask open questions that have no closed answers. LGBT people are helpless of their tendencies yet not hopeless. In the unlikely scenario when their numbers become the majority, say by natural evolution fuelled by mix marriages etcetera, then there need not be so much angst. Meanwhile the diversity can be welcomed in increasingly more connected communities. For one, LGBT could be great agents for the seemingly insurmountable efforts to engage the masculine (not just male) and feminine (not just female) personalities.
Viswa aged a lot since he appeared on Inconvenient question a couple of months ago with MP Louis.
Isn't the ostracism mutual? On the one hand, cancel culture ostracises LGBT issues and those who are not against it. On the other hand, those who are uncomfortable with LGBT and openly decries it are also ostracised for not keeping in their angst. One cause might be the imbalance of social constructs, like LGBT and its associations to sensitive matters, and the lack of scientific based knowledge of diversity of sexuality. Between the biological opposites of male and female traits lies a diverse degree of combinations. Not all like to study science and not all like to engage in language-dependent discourse. Both balances out each other out over time measured in ages longer than 1 life-time. Those who expect instant gratification might not be aware that the gratification is instantaneous. Narcissism is most rave and has to be identified - you as a member of society, are not at the centre of issues in society regardless of gender.
Viswa has the uncanny ability to ask open questions that have no closed answers. LGBT people are helpless of their tendencies yet not hopeless. In the unlikely scenario when their numbers become the majority, say by natural evolution fuelled by mix marriages etcetera, then there need not be so much angst. Meanwhile the diversity can be welcomed in increasingly more connected communities. For one, LGBT could be great agents for the seemingly insurmountable efforts to engage the masculine (not just male) and feminine (not just female) personalities.