DNA Results of Rathlin Man - Ancient Irish Genome
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2024
- Journey back in time to the Early Bronze Age and meet Rathlin Man, an ancient Irish individual whose remarkably preserved DNA has unlocked a wealth of insights into the prehistoric past.
Data Source: Cassidy LM et al., Neolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):368-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518445113
Rathlin 1 skull 3D model:
sketchfab.com/...
Facial Reconstruction Artist:
www.ancestralw...
Music:
Celtic Impulse - Celtic by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommon...)
Source: incompetech.co...
Artist: incompetech.com/
Visit MyHeritage DNA: www.myheritage...
I think i saw his brother yesterday in the supermarket. He was hunting and gathering in the grocery department.
Couldn't believe what he saw, all the fresh fruit and veggies.
Hey I'm related to that guy! I match him on MyTrueAncestry. 90% closer than other matching users.
You can test on GedMatch too in their Ancient Ancestry section.
Please do Sintashta, Sogdians, Bactrians, or Tocharians next 🙏🏻
Yes please
Sintastha are Russians , ivc bmac are aryan iranic and indic respectively,
Tocharian is from andronovo complex also explains its affinity to east cwc languages
@@boiled_fish_with_rice I'm Irish, English and German but have Sintashta DNA. as well as Ust'
ishim along with Central Asian and Iberian.
He was Indo-European -the Irish have the most Indo-European DNA in Europe!
See: Son of Manu.
really , really interesting. as a 52% irish scots welsh myself,i also have a lot of the same ethnicities mentioned. it makes a nice perspective to have the yamya e.h.g. rather than than the iberian heritage. please do more of northern europe ancestry. thanks
Yamnaya has caucasian hunter and gatherers too, not only e EHG.
@nxpx-pj1ol iberians are around 40% WSH, 40% EEF and 20% WHG
@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 girl no
@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 Iberians are around 50%-60% EEF, 25%-35% WSH, 10%-15% WHG and some influence from Mesolithic Iberomaurisians North Africans (5%)
@@heytheree same proportions of italians? Im not a fuckin girl.
Always a pleasure to see your videos.
I look like this guy's brother. My family has always claimed to be Scot/Irish/Cornish--the latter emigrating to Cornwall from Brittany. His DNA and mine are practically identical according to my test results. If you needed objective, somewhat scientific verification of the information presented here, I am an example for you.
In comparing my personal DNA haplogroups to Rathlin man, I find they are remarkably similar. My father's family was from northwest Ireland close to Derry city and county Tyrone. I have been told that I have Orkadian DNA from the Orkney islands which shows up in Rathlin man. My female DNA is from the far north of Scandinavia along the coast of the Barents Sea along the Arctic Sea coast, which is also the same haplogroup as Rathlin man.
His mtdna is present in Ireland and Norway, and the subclades of mtdna U5a1b1e are now mostly prevalent in UK
and specially at Finland
He was tall for the time period. Excellent video, thanks!!
He was average. Bell beakers were tall:
@@minmodsefa bmac and ivc / ocp were even taller
It is DNA derived from Yamnaya (proto-Indo-European) from the Pontic steppe, the British Isles have between 40% to 50%, Norwegians or Icelanders have a similar DNA. Baltic DNA is actually WHG DNA belonging to ancient Europeans.1.5% Native American = ANE DNA
Pontic steppe people has a lot of CHG too. Same proportion of EHG
@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 EHG is 70% to 75% ANE DNA and CHG is 25% to 50%, Modern Europeans derive ANE DNA 9% TO 28% ANE DNA via Yamnaya. West Siberian Indians up to 30% ANE DNA, Native Americans 11% TO 46% ANE DNA
@@eltecnico9541 CHG is around 50%
@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 EHG is the mixture of ANE with a quarter of WHG, whereby CHG is a mixture between ANE and Dzudzuana. ANE was a branch of humanity completely independent of the WHG ancient European and East Asian populations, the origin of Dzudzuana is unclear but they are believed to be closely related to basal Eurasians.
@@eltecnico9541 North and central europeans have more ANE DNA than south europeans.
Interesting that the closest modern population is Norwegians and Icelanders
because of the high amount of steppe ancestry (50%-60%)
It is DNA derived from Yamnaya (proto-Indo-European) from the Pontic steppe, the British Isles have between 40% to 50%, Norwegians or Icelanders have a similar DNA. Baltic DNA is actually WHG DNA belonging to ancient Europeans.1.5% Native American = ANE DNA that came from EHG
@@eltecnico9541 baltic is steppe ancestry too
Moreso to do with his lower EEF component.
The guy is at least 55% hunter and gatherer DNA.
he is 45% sintasha stepe , 27 % neolitic farmer l.ots of iranic baloch , afegani 7%, he got the same origins as iberian ,abkasian armenian georgian
Sooo interesting!!! I'm saving this!!
Checked out my DNA at Gedmatch and took a curious look at the ancient DNA. These Rathlin ones showed up dominant. Surprisingly only Ötzi had absolutely no match to me and my mother, although he was found less than 50km away where moms Family comes from.
Otzi was Anatolian neolithic man.
So you have very low of their genes
In my case (Armenian) Ötzi is genetic relative 😂 (one of)😂
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat OTZY WAS A north afrikan iberomaurusian
@@lba6859 ratlin is abkasian 000000 distance he just got 45% sintasha like all iberians do he his iberian , tribes he carry 27% neolitic farmer only , because he is from halsttat early bronze age , he does not have Thracian admixes like today Iberian do
@@danythrinbell1596 Shut yo mouth, he was Anatolian Neolithic, mostly closely related to modern Sardinian
Woow native american, finnish gives south siberian , yamnaya culture. Dodecad mix mode gives yamnaya and Xiongnu, LM gives Uygur. İts very clear haplogroup P was father of haplogroup R and Q lived in south siberia, kazakshistan steps. l have always a sympathy for irish people.
wow, my dna is super close when compared to Rathlin1, and less so with Rathlin2 or 3. Amazing to be able to reach back 4k years ago and say yes, I am related to him.
Please of neolithic farmers like funnelbeaker GAC cucuteni or maykop culture minoans mycenaen
please do zlaty kun woman or a Tarim EMBA (ANE rich) sample.
İ think tarim emba is closest to mansi, khanty and tatar siberian in g25 distance
@@k1r4z. interesting. do they have native american affinities at all?
@@aniketanpelletier82 They're very close to Tlingit.
2:29 the avatar’s reaction to hearing the Native American music 😁
Tarim mummies
Go , go , go
Let's put likes to this comment.
I'm very interested on Tarim mummies
Very cool results of a Rathlin man 👌👍 Indication that he was mostly of WHG and Western Steppe (Yamna) origin. Hence his closest modern populations are not Southern, Central or Eastern European but Northern & Northwestern like Norwegians/Icelandic people. Regards 🙌
Weird reasoning. No one surpasses Eastern Europeans in Steppe blood.
@robertolang9684 Yes it’s steppe. Steppe as in Yamnaya and EHG. Eastern Europeans have the most.
@@bossschmutzfink9865 It's not true that Slavs (Eastern Europeans) have the most Steppe genes. Icelandic people, Scandinavians and Irish people has the most WSH dna.
@@dejantodorovski5222 It is necessary, to take Baltic-Drift into account when handling Balts, Finns and Slavs in G25. The populations I mention are all easily around 60% early corded ware and 80% late corded ware (Sandinavians are around 50% early Cwc). Sadly due to the Baltic drift, we have a lot of misinterpretations circulating.
@robertolang9684Scientific data please.
I'm pleased to see that Rathlin man wasn't given some woke heritage.
Thank you!
However, American Indian genes probably mean a related, split off Asian bloodline.
Furthermore, he would also very likely have had Neanderthal genes, at least 3-4%
"Woke heritage?"
@@osiruskat That is, partly 'black' for reasons of political correctness..
@@andrewst9797 first off what is "black?" Not all Africans have "black" skin and many non-Africans have the color black skin like some South Asians, Andaman Islanders, Papuan New Guineans, Aboriginal Australians and Torres Straight Islanders to name a few. What you're talking about is more of a cultural identity. This is my first time seeing the Rathlin man... which is very interesting. This skeleton was around 4,000 years ago so it was way after the last glacial ice age when humans began migrating more into Central to Northern Europe...so it would have been quite a while after leaving the continent of Africa and those markers out of Africa would be at a very low percentage. It's very fascinating that Native American markers would appear and I've long suspected a relationship between Scandinavia's indigenous Saami people and indigenous Americans coming out of Russia to the Americas during one of the migration waves...both carrying haplogroups out of East Asia... possibly a connection with the mtDNA U5.
No, he has no Asian ancestry. The MyHeritage only says "Native American" because it detects ANE heritage. All Europeans have ANE heritage as do all Native Americans. But it does NOT mean Europeans are descended from Native Americans (or vice versa). It only means they both "branched" from the ANE people in Siberia like 20,000 years ago. As the ANE people moved eastward, they mixed heavily with East Asians before moving into the Americas. The ANE people who moved west into Europe never mixed with the East Asians. (Hope this makes sense).
I am related to him
And possibly agnatically! Weird thing is my ancestors are from Gascony!😮
I did the archaic dna match on GED match and he’s very orange for me.
Also related to the English and North French. Not sure why you left this out
They Aren’t related to the french , English and Welsh you mean
So the way we measure how Irish Ireland is, is by comparing it to modern data (6000 years later), against the current genome of inhabitants from these countries now?
If we compare todays genome in the UK to the UKs genome 50 years ago, its going to say 10% of us are and always have been from India or Africa, but its only been 50 years since the start of multiculturalism and the migration agenda. So its not accurate to geolocate based on modern haplogroups.
No, when these geneticists do surveys they only sample people who can prove they are natives to the area for several generations. In Britain this would mean they would sample the rural farming areas and not places like London. But even if you do only sample true "British people" it still won't be the same as a guy who lived in 2,000 BCE. Why? Because Britain has seen various immigration waves since then (Celts, Anglos, Normans, etc.) And then you've had a lot of internal movements within Britain since that time as well.
@@Wowzersdude-k5c genetic ancestry tests don't rely on surveys. They analyze DNA markers of modern people and compare them to reference populations. Your point about the complex history of regions like Britain is valid, though. It's more about broad estimates than precise accuracy. So that being said, we still measure how Irish Ireland is, by the modern data today.
@@oogabooga2581 the Irish samples have to be from a proven and unbroken 6 generations of grandparents living within a 30-kilometre region. Check out that GSI has a genome mapping lecture on their page.
do one of ancient japan populations (like yayoi, jomon or hayato ecc..) please
Very much expected. Pretty much Irish but less Neolithic so Baltic gets added.
He has at least 55% of hunter and gatherer DNA.
that's what i was thinking too
@robertolang9684 halstatt is mostly EEF btw and he lived in Ireland way before Celtic groups settled in the region
@robertolang9684 .
Isn't the red Indian mixture a surprise?
Come to think of it, could be his MtDNA. I have the same. It turns up in West Scandinavia and Finland. It was very common in ancient times but has likely been replaced by other mother lines from the Near East.
The Irish and Scots have some connection with the Scythians. Only that celts from Britania carry haplogroup R1b when Scythians carried R1a. In addition, they are somehow related to the Udmurts (wearing mainly Y - N).
It is unrelated, why are European and Turk nationalists obsessed with the identity of the Scythians? The Scythians were Iranian tribes and spoke Iranian languages Ossetians, Pamirs and Tajiks are descendants of Scythians, Eastern Iranians
Irish and scots are celts from western europe. scythians come from proto-Indo-Iranians
@@RichardEdwards40
It is not related, according to your logic, we should consider the Iranian and Indian civilizations to belong to the Europeans, it is better to be proud of the achievements of your ethnicity and not to associate ethnic groups that you are not related to for the sake of pride
The Celts did not have a magnificent civilization. This is not our problem. All people in the world are not equal. The left has brainwashed the Europeans with equality
@@Arya-vi5rqre you stupid? Im correcting him. i know they're not closely related. Scythians do indeed descend from proto-Indo-Iranians. and yes im proud that my English ancestors ruled over most of the world and that your speaking my language.
@@Arya-vi5rq
Tajiks and ossetian - not Scythians
It would be interesting to see dna results from ancient Makedonia
This makes me realize, we are all related! I have many of the ancestral DNA of this man, but in much different proportions. Still….we all have a connection.
I'm a DNA match too, hello cousin :)
?So how come he is 3% American Indian AND born in the Early Bronze Age, I thought there had been no contact between American Indians and Europeans for well over 10,000 years before the Viking contact?
I don't think this information is a correct interpretation of the DNA analysis but I'd be very happy to be corrected via some further details I am unaware of
One thing is for sure. This dude had far more Native American in him than Elizabeth '' Pocahontas '' Warren.
😂😂
You are too funny 😂
R1b = Bell Beaker
SNP's started to reaveal during bronze age among CWC and Bell-Beakers, was blonde and red hair frequent among bell-beakers?
red hair entered british isles with the bell-beakers, British bell-beakers were on average brown haired, they had blondes and gingers but with low frequencies, blonde hair spread faster in british isles bc of the vikings.
@@PaleolithicTimesthat genes came from EHG and CHG people.
@@greatbearfromthenorth9944 wdym red hair?
@@PaleolithicTimes yes. Blonde and red head hair, blues eyes and pale skin genes came from CHG and WHG people.
@PaleolithicTimes Vikings were various colourings, not just blue eyed and blonde
Wow 😵💫😵💫
Day 10 asking for Ainu results and please also one of these (Ust-Ishim/Amur river 33 0000BP/ Tian Yuan)
M
O
N
G
L
O
I
D
S.
@@fillfinish7302 Those samples belong to a sister branch of East Eurasians related to Mongoloids.
Don't force decimali just make it by yourself,goloid
@@barguttobed Western Iranians are genetically quite close.
@@mybiscuit4680 trolling is what you always do
Native American from shared EHG via strong yamnaya contributions?
Thank you a lot. :) - Unetice-Relations, interesting.
I keep wondering how there's Native American in so many of the DNA analysis of so many Europeans,,,,esp since most samples are BC . Also seeing Finnish in most too.
Native american and finnish is confused for ancient north Eurasian ancestry
Which dna analysis?
Also they put ashkenazi jew for the steppe culture😂
Because the first couple of migrations to America were from the steppes of Turkic land and are very ancient " Proto-Europeans" because the Aztecs, the Plain Indians , Southern New England Indians, and Incas have very "Aquiline Noses". Jusy like Modern day Europeans!
It relates to distant shared ancestry between Europeans and Native Americans. The original hunter gatherers of much of North Asia (Siberia) consisted of a group we call Ancient North Eurasians. Due to vast demographic shifts from Late Prehistory onwards, contemporary North Asians do not have a lot of their DNA anymore.
There were some (Central/Northern) Asian groups in later Prehistory, like the people of the Tarim Mummies from western China from the 2nd millennium BC, that still owed the majority of their DNA (ca. 80%) to these Ancient North Eurasians. (Many) Native Americans owe a bit more than 30% of their DNA to these people, the rest being owed to the Ancient (North)East Asians (who are ancestral to contemporary East Asians). Europeans owe about half of that percentage of their DNA to these Ancient North Eurasians through a different migration in western direction.
So all in all, there used to be a group of people that don't exist anymore, but both Europeans and Native Americans carry a fraction of their genetic legacy within their genomes. This shared fraction of DNA may cause confusion in the genetic results of Prehistoric Europeans.
Do Karitiana Brazilian Dna, please
Nice to meet another R1b-DF21, but he's got loads of relatives in Ireland, as 80% of us, are R1b and there is quite a few of us, who descend from DF21. 👍👍
So at 2 mins 45s, is that an indication of his ancentral route across northern europe? Baltic region, Scandinavia, Denmark, Doggerland, Scottish isles and then across to Northern Ireland?
Nice!
(It is what I expected)
I feel like some random Norwegian is going to feel entitled to consider Ireland "Norwegian Clay" after watching this.
Could you do Erfurt Ashkenazi Jews Erfurt-Me and Erfurt-Eu
I like this gaita music
I wish you'd show us if there are any DNA matches
"Celts" is prounced with a hard C, not a soft C
Ust'-ishim 45.000 old pls
Comparing my DNA to ancient samples this guy turns up as one of my hottest matches apart from some Saxon dude from the migration period.
I have no genetic relations in Ireland or Britain that I know of. I’m Swedish but I think that the relation lies in Yamnaya Steppe herder. He has tall build and light complexion like I do.
Is the Native American generic Ancient North East Asian getting confused as Amerindian?
Erin Go Bragh
Correct if I am a bit presumptuous. Are not native Americans part Eurasian! So why say Rothlin man is 1.5 Native American when it should be Eurasian.
Decimali ?? Antik Harzem veya elinizde varısa 900 lü yıllara ait Harzem insanları nın yüz şekilleri ni canlandırma yaparmısınız ?
Nothing in Rathlin Man's Old World genetics surprises me. But that there's even 7.65% Amerindian-ANE...that's a huge surprise at this time in European history! How'd that get there? You didn't answer that question at all.
There is a common ancestor for both in some of the Siberian tribes in Russia. A lot of native British people, especially the Irish and Welsh, carry a few percent of Siberian tribe DNA ancestry.
Hi Decimali!can you do on Baloch
My long lost Baltic cousin
Lol ancient Irish most close to vikings.
Americans really need to stop with all this old-fashioned 'Celtic Fringe' type of 18th-century outdated historiography
Day 11 of asking for Ainu results
Japanese friend says Ainu are not native to Japan but immigrants. Greek friend suggests a connection between Ionian (as in architecture). There is a school of thought in the martial arts of the area that there were extensive ancient connections between Japan and the west via the Silk Trails.
You forgot to ask for Ainu results one another time friend
@@barguttobed oh my. Did you ask him at least 😅
@@maliha3305No.. Oops
@@barguttobed i will continue when his next video pops up
Anyone here use the GEDmatch tool to see if anyoen else matches him?
Next Hallstatt ? or maybe Celtiberian ?
@robertolang9684 no
@robertolang9684 You're giving very inaccurate information. Rathlin is from an older population with more Steppe blood and even today Hallstatt do not match modern day Irish because they have a higher percentage of Steppe than Hallstatt did. Rathlin is a Bell Beaker from Food Vessel Culture.
Native American!!!!!
It's pronounced "kell-tick" not "sell-tick" I don't know why Americans say it this way I mean you managed to say "Celts" correctly, you didn't call them "selts" so like... yeah just had to point that out it irritates me to no end when I hear Americans saying our words wrong.
It’s robot voice who pronounced this way lol
@@barguttobed Yeah an AMERICAN robot voice.
A simple question, but how old is the 1% native American dna.
Wait, he is part native American? That definitely means there was some communication and traveling. Thank you!
That probably means old migration and that one of the related haplogroups split and stayed in Americas. Myheritage confuses people showing geographic regions with associated music instead of representing actual haplogroups, that show much better population migration and history of nations
No, it is Ancient North Eurasian DNA but you confuse it with Native American, the Irish derive 20% of their DNA from ANE via Yamnaya and modern Native Americans are 40% ANE, Native Americans are more direct descendants of Ancient North Eurasian , currently the Finns, Carelians, Saml, North Russians are the Europeans with the most ANE and DNA tests often interpret them as Inuit, Mesoamerican or Native American
Yeah that why you have brown Europeans like Sami that look very American Indian
@@colinchampollion4420 That is cool.
@@colinchampollion4420 The Sami, the Komi and the Udmurt are very close to the Ancient North Eurasian, as are the Ket in Siberia and the Native Americans.
whats up with the native american dna?
he is more North American than Finnish ! isnt this a big deal ?
how the hell is he part native american?
That's what i've been wondering! And so many samples have at least some. The only thing i can think of is that the DNA history has come from Siberia somewhere along the years, just as some NA have ties to Siberia.
@@janedoe1146 If your assumption is correct he belongs to an ancient Siberian population called Ancient North Eurasian, ANE is the common ancestor of Indo-Europeans, Indo-Iranians, Siberians, Native Americans, and Jomon from Japan. Europeans inherited ANE DNA from the paternal side through the steppe peoples and are represented by Haplogroup R, can be considered as the grandparents of Indo-Europeans and Indo-Iranians, living humans with the most ANE heritage are Udmurt, Ket, Native American, Scandinavian Sami
@@janedoe1146 Native American Haplogroup Q is sister to Indo-European and South Asian Indo-Iranian Haplogroup R, there are no pure ANE at present, Siberians and Native Americans are a mixture of ANE + East Asia, whereby the Sami are a mixture of ANE steppe peoples
Solutrean hunter gatherers crossing the Atlantic along the ice wall?
@@gerardtimings5625 irish man is bronze age he is not solutrean he is indoeuropean from bell beaker culture indoeuropean and native american share common ancestor in siberia
Could this ancient man be part if the Sammi's?
Ignore myheritages results. They are flawed.
How on earth did a bronze age Irishman get 1.5% Native American DNA?
He came from the Eurasian Steppes - he's a combination of different groups.
It relates to distant shared ancestry between Europeans and Native Americans. The original hunter gatherers of much of North Asia (Siberia) consisted of a group we call Ancient North Eurasians. Due to vast demographic shifts from Late Prehistory onwards, contemporary North Asians do not have a lot of their DNA anymore.
There were some (Central/Northern) Asian groups in later Prehistory, like the people of the Tarim Mummies from western China from the 2nd millennium BC, that still owed the majority of their DNA (ca. 80%) to these Ancient North Eurasians. (Many) Native Americans owe a bit more than 30% of their DNA to these people, the rest being owed to the Ancient (North)East Asians (who are ancestral to contemporary East Asians). Europeans owe about half of that percentage of their DNA to these Ancient North Eurasians through a different migration in western direction.
So all in all, there used to be a group of people that don't exist anymore, but both Europeans and Native Americans carry a fraction of their genetic legacy within their genomes. This shared fraction of DNA may cause confusion in the genetic results of Prehistoric Europeans.
chg when
Just from his phenotype I already bet he has scandinavian baltic finnish than the amerindian
Looks like Danny Kerry from Tool
You seem to be resistant to calling the Cornish/Kernewek a nationality like the Welsh, Irish, And Scottish. We aren't/weren't Welsh, and we were relevant.
DECIMALI............Bede, the Anglo-Saxon historian, wrote (back in 750AD) that the Irish (and Welsh)
had come up from Spain originally. Of course, mixtures would have taken place over time, including
rapes from the Angles and Saxons made it's way into the Irish (and Welsh) genome.
BUT, ORIGINALLY, from their paternal line, they were a break-off, off-shoot of the Basque people
of Spain.
One reason that convinces me, is their age-old, never-changing cultural expressions.
They're almost IDENTICAL to what the Basque do. The women's style of cultural dress, and
mostly, the dances they do: ARE TOTALLY BASQUE!
Well Bede was incorrect wasn't he? We now know the Irish mostly descend from Bell Beakers which Rathlin was which is why most Irish today are ydna R1b-L21. The Rathlin genomes were as follows 2 were R1b-DF21 and one was R1b-L21. So the Irish paternal line descends from these Bell Beakers. It is also why Irish today cluster with Northwestern Europeans and are distant from Basque populations.
Next videos danish mummies
how did he get 1.5% Native American? Does of any of his decent live today?
It has no Native American ancestry, it is just Old Siberian DNA closely related to Native Americans, Pontic Steppe Indo-Europeans share a common ancestor with Native Americans in Siberia called Ancient North Eurasian on the paternal side, the Yamnaya responsible for Haplogroup R1b in Europe share similarities with Indo-Iranians and Native Americans, Northern European Corded Ware culture the same, paternal Haplogroup R (Indo-European/Indo-Iranian) is closely related to Haplogroup Q (Native American/Altai)
so basically a celt. Celts were the first Indo-European speakers to arrive on the British and irish isles.
No, this guy is from the Bronze Age. Celts are from Iron Age Central Europe, and didn't reach the British Isles yet. First indo-european to arrive were BellBeakers.
so Rathlin man is ancestor of Celts.
cause he have high Yamnaya related ancestry as like Celts
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat He's ancestor of Insular Irish Celts, who were a mix of continental celts and monstly native british bell beakers.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat original Hallstatt Celts were 38% Steppe and 62% EEF, Later Insular Celts had even more Steppe related ancestry.
@@ilfurlano1228 No matter, they are still Celts.
Ok so this dude has American Indian DNA ... in the Bronze Age ?! That should be a ... time bomb of an announcement !! Opens a whole lot of perspectives at the least, about time to give credit to the what the Welsh, the basque and others have said in their oral traditions.
It's not that simple. There was an ancient population in Siberia they call "ANE." Some of these ANE moved west into Europe and some moved east into Asia. The ones who moved east into Asia ended up picking up extra Asian DNA and then migrated to America (and became Native Americans). The ones who moved west into Europe ended up mixing with the natives in Europe. So, it isn't really true that he has NA ancestry because the NA's hadn't yet migrated to America at the time. It's more like they are cousins and not "father/son" if that makes sense.
Hod do you get 1.5% Native American for this guy?
@robertolang9684 Sure, Anzic-1 was discovered in Montana. I'm asking about the ancestry analysis for this Rathlin Man.
Native American and Finnish are his ANE genetics.
@@dejantodorovski5222 If you said 1.5 percent Mongoloid, I would accept that but not Native American.
@@redhen2123 But Native American is partly ANE and Mongoloid also 😉
@robertolang9684 Sure, I would accept that, but not Native American, that's simply impossible.
0:30 Well the reconstruction guy looks 40-50 but not 60
That's unusual, he looks more Native American.
LMAO, Finnish are everywhere
According to my heritage. Every north European and central Asian is a bit of Finnish 😂
José's DNA indicates that 58% of his ancestry comes from Africa.
Africa
58%
Europe
35%
Western Europe
18%
Germany, France and the Netherlands
British Isles
Iberia
8%
Italy
5%
Northern Italy
south central italy
eastern europe
4%
Americas
7%Seu haplogrupo é:
I
Nascido entre 35 e 28 mil anos atrás, o haplogrupo I representa um dos primeiros povos da Europa, possuindo diversas linhagens descendentes que se espalharam por todo o território europeu durante a última Era do Gelo, tendo sua máxima frequência nos Balcãs. É um dos haplogrupos mais numerosos entre os homens europeus, sendo a segunda maior linhagem paterna encontrada no continente (perdendo apenas para a linhagem R). Sua ramificação I1 está relacionada à Europa nórdica, ancestral das tribos germânicas e Vikings, enquanto I2 está fortemente relacionada às culturas neolíticas.
Adão cromossomial-Y
160 a 120 mil anos
A: África
140 a 90 mil anos
BT: África
85 a 60 mil anos
CT: África
80 a 60 mil anos
CF: Saída da África
75 a 60 mil anos
F: Saída da África
62 a 57 mil anos
IJ: Haplogrupo pai de I e J
45 a 30 mil anos
I: Leste da Eurásia
35 a 28 mil anos
I don't buy the North American....
It is ANE DNA interpreted as Native American, currently the indigenous Siberians and Amerindians are the living humans with the most ANE DNA, then the peoples of Northeast Europe follow.
Haplogroup R is brother of Q both descend from haplogroup P south east asia papuan onge like people. Believe it
@@eltecnico9541he propably not know about the ANE people DNA from siberia wich is common ancestry over mongolic and european people.
@@eltecnico9541udmurts and saami are the closest living relatives of ane they aren't on my heritage who is terrible compared to other ancestry calculators anyways
@@kingofnpcs2547They are the closest but don’t necessarily have the most. Ket, Quechuans and some Amazonian natives have more.
It’s pronounced Keltic the C is a hard K in the Irish language
Metric please for the rest of us in the world
1.80 in centimeters. 😀
Native American?? how???
Some very strange conclusions drawn by people below. Seems like everybody sees in these numbers whatever they want to see. I see that the guy is largely a typical native Briton, much the same as in most of western Britain since 10,000 BC. There is a substantial influx of Baltic which we know came from the north in about 4000BC or later. No great surprise given his geographical location. (It is definitely NOT "viking" which has no meaning anyway). No evidence of Gaelic genes with their connection to Iberia and Turkey. That's no surprise to me either, because this is part of the kingdom of Ulster and they were never much infused with the small Celtic migration into southern Ireland in about 500BC. They brought the language nothing more. The Amerindian element is of course fascinating evidence of Britain's ancient journeys to north America - preserved in legend (especially iin Wales) but long ignored by historians. In short, the Irish are mostly British, not "celts", and we've been sailing around thee islands for a very long time - even before the homo sapien repopulation of Europe.
Gaels came from France - Gaul. Nothing to do with Iberia and Turkey.
@@johnpatrick5307 That's not accurate John Patrick. The Gaelic language spread to Ireland from Galicia in Iberia which itself probably originated from Galatia in Turkey (or shares a common origin in the Caucasus). It only takes a small but influential migration to bring a language so the arrival of a language tells us very little about migrations. The ancestral Irish are mongrels like the rest of us but at root - British people who have been around for 9,500 years longer than any "celts". This is what Rathlin man is showing you.
@@kubhlaikhan2015
The Irish aren't mongrels like the British.
The British are basically Anatolians - hence their dark features.
Galatia was founded by the Celts.
The Gaels were a Celtic tribe from Gaul - as my DNA test indicated.
@@johnpatrick5307 John Patrick, you must have misunderstood your DNA test. Nobody's ancestors are from any one place. Everybody migrates. The Gaels came to Ireland (and Britain) from SW Spain but before that they were probably Anatolian. The earliest British (and Irish) came from Carthage and the Levantine coast. But if you go back further they both came from the Caucasus and central Asia. The darker people in Turkey today are mostly Iranian in origin. The people who lived there in earlier ages - like the Greeks, Hittites and Trojans - could have been blue eyed white people for all we know. In any case, skin and eye colour are constantly evolving over time as we adapt to different environments. They are not reliable indicators of ancestral origin. Eventually, all the black people in Britain today will have white descendants. Modern Irish people are by no means "pure bred Celts". We are ALL mongrels including the Irish. "Celtic" has never had any meaning other than to describe a language group and anyone can learn a language it tells you zero about their race, ancestry or origin. You want history and identity to be simple and definitive but they aren't.
@@kubhlaikhan2015
If Celts mean nothing then all your labels, like Greeks, Hittites and Trojans mean nothing.
Twisting everything to suit your agenda means that we can't find out anything - which, I guess is what you want.
In the case of early Ireland, it is simple an definitive - the Irish were Indo-Europeans, they spoke Gaelic and came from Gaul.
They remained in Ireland, while Britain was colonised by Anatolian farmers, then the Romans.
Iberians have yamnaia heritage too.
yes but relatively low, the Iberian DNA is more EEF of the Neolithic farmers, this DNA is strongly related to the Anatolians and West Asians
@@eltecnico9541You have to update, you are wrong. You have to read the most recent study done on ancient iberian populations, by Harvard University and Barcelona University, conducted by David Reich. The study lasted 10 years and scientists concluded when the yamnaia reached Iberian Peninsula the Iberian males practically disappeared, it was a surprise because scientists though the yamnaia genetics were low. So, most men and their sons and daughters descend from yamnaia.
Source: Published in the journals Nature and Science in 2019.
@@mollydacostaCaleigh Yes that is correct but that is the paternal haplogroup R1b, 70% of the Iberian population is of Yamnaya descent through the Celts, but I am referring to the autosomal DNA (genetic load) is relatively low compared to the peoples of the north and east , 55.5% of the Iberian DNA is of Early European Farmer (EEF) origin, which has its origin in Anatolia, the Yamnaya autosomal DNA is only 29.9% in the Iberians. Yamnaya lived 6000 years ago in the Pontic steppe, gave rise to the Corded Ware culture in Northeast Europe, the corded ware culture mixed with EEF in central Europe giving rise to the Celts, the Celts arrived 4500 years ago and replaced the lineage Iberian masculine, but the Celts themselves were a mixture of Yamnaya and EEF, the Celts from the British Isles are more pure and have 45% DE Yamnaya
@@mollydacostaCaleigh The Iberian DNA is similar to the Mediterranean populations of southern Europe and western Asia,
He has the Turkic genes
Aman tanrım kardeş dayan,lütfen herkese türk deme ya,anti türkçü bozuklar kommentine saldiracaklar
How?
100% Turkic
@@rb98769 The world is Turkic. Don't be jealous.
I want you to tell me what you understand by the name - Turkic genes ?
Native American???
Irish people have a lot of Indo-European ancestry and North Eurasian.
Their North Eurasian (ANE) derives from their Indo European WSH ancestry
@@barguttobed what means WSH?
@@Sebastian-vg9nt Western Steppe Herder
@@barguttobed I know that, that is what I meant.
they do. Half.
Native American might be a artifact , virtually impossible
Ok… how did this man get 1.5% Native American?
Native americans and steppe herders have a common ancestor in the paleolithic siberian population of the ancient north eurasians, haplogroups Q and R come form them
@@luca-jminecraftxx9960 but aren’t the Siberian / Eurasian Steppe DNA signatures found in Bronze Age Western Europe discernible from those that contribute to the ancient Indigenous American?
Maybe it’s just a quirk of the modern software being used in the video. (There is a written disclaimer thrown in there)
@@free2trudge Myheritage alogorithm has proven incapable of doing so, many turks score it too on their tests nowadays
@@luca-jminecraftxx9960 oh that’s interesting. Thanks for the info. I love hearing about all the interesting connections and unique mixes of genetics that are being found by testing ancient dna.
Its confusing sometimes, but always interesting.
It looks like Turkey and areas around the Black Sea are proving to be a very big part of almost everyone’s past. So cool!