The vast majority of those pc are like shity office stuff in terms of pc built for gaming with gpus that market is waaaay smaller and the top top of the line work station pc are already all nivida cus amd is for the best dollar o performance nivida is for the best of the best company’s already spending tens of thousands don’t care about the 200 dollars they can save with the budget options they go to ces to look at the 20 thousand dollar super cards
He's been doing things like this for a long time. From over exaggerated claims to clickbaity titles I've seen him do thus for a while in much older videos
@@omegachadrequiem3831 i agree but you dont know if uou are going to he that 1 in a thousand, but you will probably know if you are good looking and willing to show urself on camera
not in the slightest, nvidia has better drivers, more overall support from game developers, and the 16, 20 & 30 series GPUs are still a much better pick than any AMD gpu comparatively. Bro's just saying stuff over here lol
@@BearBlair better drivers? its not 2013 anymore, and by support you mean what? fsr frame gen is supported by any dx11 or dx12 game and Nvidia only like 20 💀💀😭
@@cube5380 AMDs gpu drivers are really locked down compared to Nvidia's and just overall operate worse, its awful. And don't even trip I've been on boths sides for both the CPU and GPU world. So it's not like i'm just talking out my ass either.
The new 4080ti super is equally priced to XTX and will most likely match it's performance too.... I am not saying Nvidia is fairly priced.... but I AM saying that both nvidia and amd are fucking us over
@@HunterTracks”amd isn’t stupid, because i dreamt that there’s a chance that they would probably reduce their prices after the new gpus drop, probably.” do you see how stupid you sound?
How many of the Linux users are actually hardcore gamers. The reason it is 2% is because of mostly some developers and server machines which operate significantly better on Linux than on Windows. Don't get me wrong I like AMD gpus for their performance but this is a good feature by Nvidia. If your arguing against the creator, valid but if not it has absolutely basis whatsoever.
NVENC is eh for most people. The bigger thing is CUDA, which is the only thing preventing most nvidia users from switching over. Seriously AMD needs to enter into the GPU compute sector.
I've heard good things about amd Linux stability. but CUDA is faster from that same post, it just doesn't work all the time(it might have changed as this is most likely software related)
AMD dropped the ball with Vega compute support took a nosedive, gcm cards usually ran circles around Nvidia in pure compute power. But rocm and hip support is picking up fast especially now with the big ai craze.
I'm an Nvidia owner, but I know this feature would have no effect on my decision to buy an AMD card......And most gamers don't give a rat's ass about streaming natively on your GPU either....Regular streaming is working just fine!
I don't even care about this but having cuda, tensor and rt cores and even a dedicated hardware encoder is just so good (how would I write my cuda c++ code on an AMD GPU)
@@PFnove honestly, I don't know most of that stuff you mentioned, but as an observant layman who looks at the real life results, AMD cards render graphics just as a good, no?
@@TooToo246 can't write fast and very simple GPU code with AMD GPUs because they never bothered to create their own version of cuda c++, also no dlss, no rtx, no tensor cores for ai acceleration, no hw encoding, list goes on aka if you're a normal person AMD is fine, else you can't justify not going team green
@@PFnove well, AMD have their own upscaler, I think it's called FSR3, and it also works on Nvidia cards. And they do support Raytracing (yes, it wasn't as good as RTX before, but now it's really catching up fast), and they have ROCm, which is the equivalent of CUDA.....Yes, AMD were lagging behind back in 2020/2021, but their tech has much improved, and it works surprisingly well now, and on older cards too. And they proved that you can achieve results pretty close to Nvidia's, without as much reliance on generation-specific hardware as Nvidia....Also, AMD have no problem sharing their tech with Nvidia cards. Vulkan, FSR, and ROCm, they're all compatible with Nvidia cards, while Nvidia go out of their way to make their tech hardware-locked to their cards to monopolize the market!.....I'm an Nvidia user, but I have way more respect for AMD. When people know the company is not trying to screw them over and trying to wall them in, they'll be willing to compromise a little!
@@TooToo246 yeah and it sucks balls (I compared fsr2 quality to dlss2 performance in cyberpunk 2077, and I guess you can't beat machine learning with some simple algorithm)
"RIP AMD"? Most people that buy AMD, are generally gamers... and like maybe 1% of those are streamers. Over 550 million gamers play on Radeon, so take that into perspective...
@@PFnove consider AMD for cost effectiveness since cuda is starting to run on Radeon now. If you still feel nvidia is better then at least get an h++ verifed model so it doesnt combust.
Translation: Nvidia threw millions of dollars at a corporation to make proprietary software that only works with their products in order to gatekeep the competition. Same as they did with cuda acceleration. AMD gpus have the power to do as well if not BETTER than Nvidia, if these companies would allow software that takes advantage of AMD hardware same as they did for Nvidia.
The dumbest thing is thst AMD never bothered to do the same with Nvidia. As long as they're not doing it more and more people would still going for NV.
It’s not that they don’t allow other software, it’s that you gotta pay someone to code and create all of that and they don’t come cheap. The company that pays them also takes a big cut.
@@linkfreeman1998Actually AMD did it with Starfield recently but to be honest it's just business. Shouldn't determine any decision when purchasing time comes around. Price/ performance for the purpose should always be king, always.
@@tufab3494 Technically Zach was working on PC builds as technican job. He already mentioned about Intel, Nvidia and AMD on any pros and cons for giving people know about informations. Honestly I saw so much comments are really praised on AMD over Nvidia, but they didn't realized that other countries doesn't do for gaming mostly, it's more on productivity tasks for daily usage, so that's why they chose Nvidia rather than AMD in trems of their requirements. Prices also some differences than US prices, so Zach too many suggestions for choosing AMD is "only apply on US".
@@BillyRazOr2011 yes, exactly. People on this channel seem to think that PC Hardware revolves around gaming, when it's actually much more than that. I am a 3D artist and my perspective on those things is already hugely different from the average US gamer
@@tufab3494 You're right. And yep, every user have different positions and different thoughts for what kind of things they needed depends on their specifications. People saying who is fanboy aren't doing/giving any benefits on it, because every company are mostly cares on profits over taking care on customers, they don't want to give a sh*t for anything reasons as well.
Why is this better for Nvidia owners? Increased GPU load and increased power consumption. And it's not like the viewer will magically get their videos faster directly from you, they will still need to get it from twitch servers. I see, this feature is for only those who do streaming for a job because they would have better rigs.
The only good thing I saw in the article is that this "paves the way for new codes support" like av1 and hevc, so that is actually good. just wish twitch simply used dedicated hardware in thier servers instead, amd sells an encoding card that can do 30(32?) av1 Streams at once and doesn't consume too much power
I follow a streamer who's been beta-testing Enhanced Broadcast, and there's a significant quality improvement on her 720p and 480p transcodes. 720p in particular is almost indistinguishable from 1080p in fast scenes, and startlingly close even in slower scenes. This is even before enabling HEVC streaming, which Twitch still hasn't allowed them to do yet.
Its cause now twitch wont lag. Formerly twitch had an infamy of lagging on live broadcast. This will make it harder on the streamer's gpu but bigger streamers will obviously not be affected by it.
It will impact you as the streamer yes, both in power consumption as it is encoding more streams and your upload speed, but hey, Amazon and thier trillionaire CEO will save 50k usd in dedicated encoders and like 1k in electricity bills! So it's a poggers champ EZ Clap move in twitches eyes
Is this an attempt by Twitch to reduce their server costs? lmao Why waste money by encoding people's footage when they can just have people do it for them lol. And no there won't be a huge difference if you use this or not, the only difference is in Twitch's pocket.
Doubt it, Nvidia is worth far more than intel. Might not see a connection but a company that has well established GPU productions and has more money at its disposal would typical come out ahead I see intel becoming some competition in price to performance but certainly not surpassing in raw performance.
This is good news, up until now stream vods / highlights relied on recording the stream live, so they could include the chat, which leads to compressed quality
you can make obs do this with any modern gpu if you know how to do it but with this if the streamer has slow internet sending out multiple resolution streams will still be slow.
The big change is that it's being rolled into OBS's Twitch integration, _and_ Twitch will actually accept the multiple streams. Right now neither is true except for the beta testers, who are getting special builds of OBS.
that's why i switch to nvidia gpu since the days of playing original crysis 1 pc on very low settings, my amd gpu back then can't even run crysis right.
The same way we should value real wprld performance in games as a way of measuring GPU performance (instead of synthetic benchmarks), it makes no sense to value hardware encoding and making such a big deal out of it when 99% of people wont ever use the feature.
But what kind of performance hit is the streamer going to get from this and is their internet connection going to be able to upload fast enough to keep up with all of the options? Does this mean the days of dual PC streaming setups is coming back?
I've been following your channel for some weeks now. I remember seeing some recent videos swearing by AMD over Nvidia/Intel. So how does this short affect your perspective in the general picture?
Since only like 5% of gamers actually stream and of that 5% only 1% actually cares about the quality and what this actually benefits to them. Im suspecting this wont be all that important at all
Rtx 4060ti 8gb or rx 6750xt 12gb for 1080p high fps gaming...pls tell me...😅 In India their price difference is only $2-3 (4060ti higher in price)....I have a i5 12400f ddr5 rig and 750w psu...and this is my first gaming pc so I was researching for 2months to choose products but still can't decide between GPUs😅
So what impact is it going to affect users of AV1 for streaming? unless nvenc also includes AV1 sure but for a normal person it is just addition fluff to rank up the price
TikTok Live also has a similar thing for PC Gamers on their OBS Clone. I legitimately might get an Nvidia GPU to live alongside my Arc A770 at this rate.
I forgot that everyone and their mother is a Twitch streamer these days
lol that’s so true
😂😂
I mean if u could make money off ur daily bs why not attempt to make it a business opportunity. Except most mfs lack the actual skill and dedication
That's why the rtx 4060 is only great if you're a streamer
Not really I thought it would be a huge update or something but it’s not needed for me😂
OMG like 0.01% of PC gamers are impacted by that 🤯
Yeah thats right
It is important for a ton of content creators though
I'm sure the other 99.9% of the other streamers families will appreciate the better quality tho 😊
@@auritro3903yeah I’m definitely getting a 500+ bucks gpu to satisfy my 3 viewers💯👍
Completly true
Ah yes, 7.5m twitch streamers compared to the total 1.85b pc users will have a humongous impact on AMD's downfall
just gives them another useless reason to buy nvidia
@@r_ex_7nvidia fanboys will find any reason to spend more money on similar performance for gaming
for a person who even thinks watching stream is boring, this is more of a gimmick thing
@@nicholasxamotainiumgilgameshit’s a gimmick but there’s a lot less stress on the cpu especially when streaming and playing games, so you get more fps
The vast majority of those pc are like shity office stuff in terms of pc built for gaming with gpus that market is waaaay smaller and the top top of the line work station pc are already all nivida cus amd is for the best dollar o performance nivida is for the best of the best company’s already spending tens of thousands don’t care about the 200 dollars they can save with the budget options they go to ces to look at the 20 thousand dollar super cards
Not a streamer , still going with amd
Same
Is Rx 580 still supported by AMD drivers?
@@johnphilipv.sorianojr.73 yup
@@johnphilipv.sorianojr.73 after a quick goggle search, no
Honestly rtx 4090 is trash because of rx7900xt 20 less fps of 2X less price
Such a stupid title.
Agreed
Is he even streaming on twitch?!?!?
Yeah just designed to get clicks.
@@OoOthememesguy Yes he does.
the 4080 super will be betteer option then the 7900 xtx
Expected better from you Zach, what a misleading title.
Ngl, same. Big zach fan but his vid titles had been very click baity recently.
dont expect anything from him lol, idk it was a month ago but now he just blatantly promoting grey sites and things like that
He's been doing things like this for a long time. From over exaggerated claims to clickbaity titles I've seen him do thus for a while in much older videos
Another crying fanboy AMD umb 💀
@@CosmicMaanzHow is this one clickbait? He is a streamer as well so isn't it reasonable for him to switch?
Basically it's only benifit you if you are a streamer or contact creator.
But it certainly gives people more options and hopefully strike rich
@@allenliu8820 out of the hundreds of thousands trying to get famous only one will.
@@omegachadrequiem3831yeah. By benefiting from others.
And are a partner
@@omegachadrequiem3831 i agree but you dont know if uou are going to he that 1 in a thousand, but you will probably know if you are good looking and willing to show urself on camera
Ah yeah, rip amd...
AMD=gaming/price to performance
Nvidia= streaming/gaming
I stream on an R9 380 you have no idea what your talking about
@@bikeswithpower6564 did you watch the video?
not in the slightest, nvidia has better drivers, more overall support from game developers, and the 16, 20 & 30 series GPUs are still a much better pick than any AMD gpu comparatively. Bro's just saying stuff over here lol
@@BearBlair better drivers? its not 2013 anymore, and by support you mean what? fsr frame gen is supported by any dx11 or dx12 game and Nvidia only like 20 💀💀😭
@@cube5380 AMDs gpu drivers are really locked down compared to Nvidia's and just overall operate worse, its awful. And don't even trip I've been on boths sides for both the CPU and GPU world. So it's not like i'm just talking out my ass either.
This man switches his opinions more ofthen than I switch my socks, which is quite often.
Amd will have something similar soon. It still doesn’t justify the insane markup for nvidia gpus
The new 4080ti super is equally priced to XTX and will most likely match it's performance too.... I am not saying Nvidia is fairly priced.... but I AM saying that both nvidia and amd are fucking us over
@@izanagisburden9465AMD isn't stupid, they'll probably drop the price on their upper range to compensate for Super cards.
@@HunterTracks”amd isn’t stupid, because i dreamt that there’s a chance that they would probably reduce their prices after the new gpus drop, probably.” do you see how stupid you sound?
@@HunterTracksand that’s good for us
@@OoOthememesguygood for us who want an gpu for a good price
AMD has open source linux drivers, while Nvidia does not. Linux users are about 2% of pc users, while streamers are less than 0.1%
How many of the Linux users are actually hardcore gamers. The reason it is 2% is because of mostly some developers and server machines which operate significantly better on Linux than on Windows. Don't get me wrong I like AMD gpus for their performance but this is a good feature by Nvidia. If your arguing against the creator, valid but if not it has absolutely basis whatsoever.
@@Z_eroOfficialthat 2% is mostly steam decks
There is millions of steam decks alone, steam works great on linux linux users aren't all devs and servers. @@Z_eroOfficial
Bro switched to team green🤧
NVENC is eh for most people. The bigger thing is CUDA, which is the only thing preventing most nvidia users from switching over. Seriously AMD needs to enter into the GPU compute sector.
There's ROCm... If only it worked 🤣
I've heard good things about amd Linux stability. but CUDA is faster from that same post, it just doesn't work all the time(it might have changed as this is most likely software related)
AMD dropped the ball with Vega compute support took a nosedive, gcm cards usually ran circles around Nvidia in pure compute power. But rocm and hip support is picking up fast especially now with the big ai craze.
@@xfy123 one can only hope. my 3060 is starting to struggle with my compute workloads and i can’t afford to pay $1200 for a 4080/90
NVENC is the holy grail of encoders. AMD is dead last, behind Intel's QuickSync
"Omg this Is a game changer " said 0.001% of people that have nvidia gpus 💀💀💀💀
What???? oMg.
*proceeds to buy the RX 6700XT*
Good choice
Good choice! consider the 7800xt also, banger GPU for current gen.
@@autismo3201 it's not really tho
@@kaljamaistuuperjantaisin but its not bad either
@@autismo3201 it's actually pretty good but there's always gonna be better card from nvidia
I'm an Nvidia owner, but I know this feature would have no effect on my decision to buy an AMD card......And most gamers don't give a rat's ass about streaming natively on your GPU either....Regular streaming is working just fine!
I don't even care about this but having cuda, tensor and rt cores and even a dedicated hardware encoder is just so good (how would I write my cuda c++ code on an AMD GPU)
@@PFnove honestly, I don't know most of that stuff you mentioned, but as an observant layman who looks at the real life results, AMD cards render graphics just as a good, no?
@@TooToo246 can't write fast and very simple GPU code with AMD GPUs because they never bothered to create their own version of cuda c++, also no dlss, no rtx, no tensor cores for ai acceleration, no hw encoding, list goes on
aka if you're a normal person AMD is fine, else you can't justify not going team green
@@PFnove well, AMD have their own upscaler, I think it's called FSR3, and it also works on Nvidia cards. And they do support Raytracing (yes, it wasn't as good as RTX before, but now it's really catching up fast), and they have ROCm, which is the equivalent of CUDA.....Yes, AMD were lagging behind back in 2020/2021, but their tech has much improved, and it works surprisingly well now, and on older cards too. And they proved that you can achieve results pretty close to Nvidia's, without as much reliance on generation-specific hardware as Nvidia....Also, AMD have no problem sharing their tech with Nvidia cards. Vulkan, FSR, and ROCm, they're all compatible with Nvidia cards, while Nvidia go out of their way to make their tech hardware-locked to their cards to monopolize the market!.....I'm an Nvidia user, but I have way more respect for AMD. When people know the company is not trying to screw them over and trying to wall them in, they'll be willing to compromise a little!
@@TooToo246 yeah and it sucks balls (I compared fsr2 quality to dlss2 performance in cyberpunk 2077, and I guess you can't beat machine learning with some simple algorithm)
"RIP AMD"? Most people that buy AMD, are generally gamers... and like maybe 1% of those are streamers. Over 550 million gamers play on Radeon, so take that into perspective...
Even less than 1%, and most of those 1% just do it for fun, maybe like 0.01% pc owners are real stramers and get some money from twitch
@@walter-bijeli
Especially if you count how many Twitch streamers have moved to CZcams because of Twitch's recent bad moves.
Dont forget about console users, those are Radeon powered also, AND THOSE STREAM!
idk man I play games mostly but cuda and tensor cores are already enough to pick what gpu I buy
@@PFnove consider AMD for cost effectiveness since cuda is starting to run on Radeon now. If you still feel nvidia is better then at least get an h++ verifed model so it doesnt combust.
Nothing that would make me get rid of my 7900xtx😊
Speaks in *RTX 4080 SUPER*
@@kaljamaistuuperjantaisin 7900xtx better
Thats terrible power draw tho
@@morocuda2090 it's not better tho
@@kaljamaistuuperjantaisin it is.
Translation: Nvidia threw millions of dollars at a corporation to make proprietary software that only works with their products in order to gatekeep the competition. Same as they did with cuda acceleration. AMD gpus have the power to do as well if not BETTER than Nvidia, if these companies would allow software that takes advantage of AMD hardware same as they did for Nvidia.
The dumbest thing is thst AMD never bothered to do the same with Nvidia. As long as they're not doing it more and more people would still going for NV.
It’s not that they don’t allow other software, it’s that you gotta pay someone to code and create all of that and they don’t come cheap. The company that pays them also takes a big cut.
@@linkfreeman1998 AMD are trying to be the good guy of the industry, but Nvidia are really pushing them into conforming to their tactics
If we're being honest there Nvidia could dominate the market a lot more that it does right now
@@linkfreeman1998Actually AMD did it with Starfield recently but to be honest it's just business. Shouldn't determine any decision when purchasing time comes around. Price/ performance for the purpose should always be king, always.
It feels akward to see Zach "praising" NVidia
It's just a fact.
@@BillyRazOr2011 yeah, but considering he's an AMD fanboy as well as most of his audience, this is weird.
@@tufab3494 Technically Zach was working on PC builds as technican job. He already mentioned about Intel, Nvidia and AMD on any pros and cons for giving people know about informations.
Honestly I saw so much comments are really praised on AMD over Nvidia, but they didn't realized that other countries doesn't do for gaming mostly, it's more on productivity tasks for daily usage, so that's why they chose Nvidia rather than AMD in trems of their requirements. Prices also some differences than US prices, so Zach too many suggestions for choosing AMD is "only apply on US".
@@BillyRazOr2011 yes, exactly. People on this channel seem to think that PC Hardware revolves around gaming, when it's actually much more than that. I am a 3D artist and my perspective on those things is already hugely different from the average US gamer
@@tufab3494 You're right. And yep, every user have different positions and different thoughts for what kind of things they needed depends on their specifications. People saying who is fanboy aren't doing/giving any benefits on it, because every company are mostly cares on profits over taking care on customers, they don't want to give a sh*t for anything reasons as well.
Why is this better for Nvidia owners? Increased GPU load and increased power consumption. And it's not like the viewer will magically get their videos faster directly from you, they will still need to get it from twitch servers.
I see, this feature is for only those who do streaming for a job because they would have better rigs.
The only good thing I saw in the article is that this "paves the way for new codes support" like av1 and hevc, so that is actually good. just wish twitch simply used dedicated hardware in thier servers instead, amd sells an encoding card that can do 30(32?) av1 Streams at once and doesn't consume too much power
And god forbid you have anything resembling limited upload bandwidth.
you make roblox r63 your opinion will never matter
@@spongeboss_richpants and you're the guy who got banned on Roblox for 8 days. While me, a Roblox female rig maker hasn't
@@Aston3003 where tf you get 8 days from
Nvidia: Streaming and rendering
AMD: Gaming and price to performance
It's a beta feature, so it'll be nVidia-exclusive during that beta. Once out of beta, it'll be available for AMD, Intel, and Apple Silicon.
So its the same but you will have like 2% better resolution if the streamer's internet is good? But no performance gains or lower thermals?
I follow a streamer who's been beta-testing Enhanced Broadcast, and there's a significant quality improvement on her 720p and 480p transcodes. 720p in particular is almost indistinguishable from 1080p in fast scenes, and startlingly close even in slower scenes.
This is even before enabling HEVC streaming, which Twitch still hasn't allowed them to do yet.
WAUW I, A NON STREAMER, CANNOT STAND THIS AND I AM GONNA SWITCH TO NVIDIA!!! 🤯🤯🤯
i understand that you gotta do a little bit of clickbating but sheesh zach, your shorts are getting more clickbaity everyday
i can already imagine streamers stacking up them rtx
they already do so it will just be the same
This man was not being sarcastic enough with his voice. It sounds like he's being deadass. 💀💀💀
For streaming purposes not gaming. NVIDIA ain't killing shit.
There are probably more people affected by Nvidia's worse drivers on Linux than people who will actually be missing out on this with AMD.
Inspirational quote:
"If yoy but a geu it Wheel become irrevelant in 2 day."
Wauw he changed crazily.
Question: how does this help? Wouldn’t be worse as it is more usage on the GPU?
Its cause now twitch wont lag. Formerly twitch had an infamy of lagging on live broadcast. This will make it harder on the streamer's gpu but bigger streamers will obviously not be affected by it.
ok my man should stop with the clickbait titles
People over estimate the importance of streamers waaay too much.
Wouldn't this need NASA level internet??
It will impact you as the streamer yes, both in power consumption as it is encoding more streams and your upload speed, but hey, Amazon and thier trillionaire CEO will save 50k usd in dedicated encoders and like 1k in electricity bills! So it's a poggers champ EZ Clap move in twitches eyes
@@helpmedaddyjesus7099 Chat type W mans for this rizz moment
@@helpmedaddyjesus7099bro do ou need help 💀
Is this an attempt by Twitch to reduce their server costs? lmao
Why waste money by encoding people's footage when they can just have people do it for them lol.
And no there won't be a huge difference if you use this or not, the only difference is in Twitch's pocket.
I prefer Nvidia as well but i think intel will become new king in a few years
Doubt it, Nvidia is worth far more than intel. Might not see a connection but a company that has well established GPU productions and has more money at its disposal would typical come out ahead I see intel becoming some competition in price to performance but certainly not surpassing in raw performance.
Could be this year with battlemage (as long as those drivers are good this time)
This is good news, up until now stream vods / highlights relied on recording the stream live, so they could include the chat, which leads to compressed quality
Also this is definitely something that AMD is going to get on, and eventually Intel.
Its a huge change to the quality of streams in general
Should I buy a 3060 to or a rx 7600XT for my first pc build?
Pretty sure it will be a 4000 series exclusivity
But why would I overburden my pc with this when Twitch has dedicated servers setup to do the same?
It saves twitch money and instead puts more load on the streamer XD
Such a good feature
Hey Zach just wondering when your prebuilt pcs will come back in stock
This guys has switched gpu companies more times than the amount of sand in the desert.
How about in combination with an integrated graphics within the Intel CPU?
Never thought I would hear Zack say this
Max Kellerman doing PC reviews now ? 🤯
Day 4 asking for an 1660 pls
I love watching this absolute war between brands meanwhile I don't have either cuz I'm on integrated graphics so I can sit back and watch
you can make obs do this with any modern gpu if you know how to do it but with this if the streamer has slow internet sending out multiple resolution streams will still be slow.
The big change is that it's being rolled into OBS's Twitch integration, _and_ Twitch will actually accept the multiple streams. Right now neither is true except for the beta testers, who are getting special builds of OBS.
*AMD still knowing they're winning (taking Market share) from intel in the CPU Market, and has a genius plan to take from Nvidia:* Ok.
Bruh, what happened to all the comments, why are they forgetting that Zach is talking about himself and he is a streamer too
Not everyone livestreams??????
that's why i switch to nvidia gpu since the days of playing original crysis 1 pc on very low settings, my amd gpu back then can't even run crysis right.
Well as a non steamer. I'm okay in the dust
Episode 1 of asking What cpu do you reccomend for the 5700XT
5600 should be fine, 5700 if you need 8 cores
Thanks mate that was what i was going for but i am no expert at pc's so i had to ask the people who actually know.@@autismo3201
aside from not everyone streaming, another problem is that now you need the upload bandwidth to handle all those streams at once.
Rip to all 3 people that is effected by this. Rest is still fine
Was there anything on there cpus? I got exited at the start because i thought you were talking about the Nvidia cpus
is this for all GPUs or only for super models ?
That's what switched me over to nvidia because of twitch broadcasting
my 6800xt chilling in the cart: 😞
You could by a cheap gpu and use it for streaming while the main gpu is for gaming
Cool. Who streams at Twitch these days tho?
The same way we should value real wprld performance in games as a way of measuring GPU performance (instead of synthetic benchmarks), it makes no sense to value hardware encoding and making such a big deal out of it when 99% of people wont ever use the feature.
The second he started to talk about switch obs I got the whole conclusion
For a second there I thought I was in trouble with my amd gpu, nice to know it’s just some streamer bs
Resorting to clickbait are we?
My Internet isnt even good enough for streaming in 480p
Congrats on the 7900xtx
You’re a bit late
Bro switched teams 😢
*Dude im gonna get nvidia gpu for that" said no one ever
Oh this one will ruffle some feathers
That's nice to know now my viewers of about no one can enjoy my stream in whatever resolution they like.
Bro i just installed a 7900xt last year and this is going on.?
Still gonna stream with my new 7900xtx, womp womp
so how does help small streamers if they have to stream the quality now instead of there viewers bc won’t that strain their internet ? or gpu
But what kind of performance hit is the streamer going to get from this and is their internet connection going to be able to upload fast enough to keep up with all of the options?
Does this mean the days of dual PC streaming setups is coming back?
Do you like Intel for CPUs still?
Last I checked AMF was supported in OBS. Is this guy serious?
And now streamers will need gigabit upload speed...
I've been following your channel for some weeks now. I remember seeing some recent videos swearing by AMD over Nvidia/Intel. So how does this short affect your perspective in the general picture?
Ryzen 3 is good for rx 580?
Since only like 5% of gamers actually stream and of that 5% only 1% actually cares about the quality and what this actually benefits to them. Im suspecting this wont be all that important at all
You put the numbers too high, more like 1% people stream, and maybe 0.1% actually care about the streams.
@@walter-bijeli nah there's a lot of people who stream just not successfully. Every other person I talk to has dabbled
The only question is
How much the NVEC encoder affects the performance of the GPU?
Seems like that would eat up a lot of bandwidth. Playing a multiplayer game....
If you are encoding multiple streams of video while playing a game, won’t it take a big hit on performance?
Can you explain the difference of intergrated and external GPU?
Im not sure if im using the correct one.
As a linux user, oh yes, so happy that I have a Nvidia graphics card. Yippie.
Rtx 4060ti 8gb or rx 6750xt 12gb for 1080p high fps gaming...pls tell me...😅
In India their price difference is only $2-3 (4060ti higher in price)....I have a i5 12400f ddr5 rig and 750w psu...and this is my first gaming pc so I was researching for 2months to choose products but still can't decide between GPUs😅
Go for the 6750 it's cheaper and can still hold its own against the 4060
@@scythixx7 but I was talking about rtx 4060ti 8gb
@@scythixx7 although that 12gb vram is more important for those UE5 games we are gonna get in future
So what impact is it going to affect users of AV1 for streaming? unless nvenc also includes AV1 sure but for a normal person it is just addition fluff to rank up the price
It’s also WAYYY easier to play games on “stretched” resolution on a nvidia GPU. That takes the cake for me at least.
But the 7000 series has av1 . Am I missing something?
Now they just need to make their linux drivers usable...
Damn i still dont know if i should get wait for the 4080 super or snag a 7900xtx. I game and do game desing so loads of modeling and game engine work
I got a amd prosessor with a nvidia gpu😭
TikTok Live also has a similar thing for PC Gamers on their OBS Clone. I legitimately might get an Nvidia GPU to live alongside my Arc A770 at this rate.
what’s the best cpu for an RTX 4060
in the AM 5 range ?
The catch is will twitch remain in business long enough for NVIDIA gpu owners to enjoy this feature?
Will nvidia place a patent on this 🤔