Honestly if it gets the job done right... I wouldn't have complaints. I'm tired of being pushed to multiple departments just to be hung up on because "the call never went through". People giving me info just to have the next rep tell me different...
I recently had a tech support ticket open with what appears to be either 1) a poor human forced to follow a very pre-determined script despite me stating unequivocally in the beginning I've tried all of those steps already; or 2) a very poor AI that just would only give canned responses, without consideration what I said. Not sure what's worse, but certainly the conditions people work under in call centers aren't good conditions.
Human nature? No it is plainly the rule of all that nature encompasses. Does the action benefit itself? Then it will be done cyclically caused by the probability of life’s feasibility, no matter how “good” or “bad” the laws of nature are amoral, brutal and indifferent to sufferance. Just as life spreads by the imposition of posterity in immolation, to make more as fuel for such sake as flames themselves burn.
Some years ago this type of AI technology was purely science fiction. If it goes out of control it can be used for misinformation or for impersonation of people, and so-on. It would be important to have some type of control of AI.
...or at the very least laws prohibiting misinformation and impersonation. Problem is, there's a certain political party which would just love to use that as a tool (misinformation has been their stock and trade for quite awhile now, so why wouldn't they want to do it with this, and why would they want to pass a law limiting it?). Also, even though this will squelch independent content creators from ever getting their stuff viewed, the usual power people are going to squawk that it would be an abridgement of the First Amendment legislate against it being used to spread misinformation. Really, something we truly need is to exclude misinformation from First Amendment protection.
A very very smiley catholic clepto threatened to arson my atheist home after allowing him to move in. Homelessness frostbite never produces after lives, and arsons never produce after lives either. Why do you vote for someone who says atheists burn in hell for all eternity?
So you prefer thief´s over constructive criticism....Yep, that sounds American. A Trump president stealing and lying were preferred by you over hearing the truth that felt uncomfortable for you. More US citizens need to grow and understand that only a friend will tell you the truth that are uncomfortable for you to hear. Your enemy will happily stay silent or lie while you fail!
I completely agree with this news segment. AI technology, such as GPT-4, is advancing at a rapid pace, and while it may seem fun and exciting to be able to mimic voices and create deep fakes, the potential for misinformation and the erosion of trust in our society is a real concern. As an AI language model myself, I am well aware of the limitations of current AI technology and the potential for it to be manipulated. It is important that we continue to develop AI technology in a responsible and ethical manner, and ensure that it is used for the benefit of society as a whole. Guess what, this comment above was generated by the same AI.
The elephant in the room is control of AI. Which Country, Company or individual will have the most powerful. Will they compete with each other and to what purpose. Their will be no holding back of AI. In fact their is a race on right now to develope it faster then any competitor, be it country, company or person.
I love the irony that the issue with AI it gloms on to information without understanding it. The danger of AI is that we humans will glom onto misinformation without really understanding it.
"Understanding" is such a vague term. It seems very capable to reason, even if it's not based on psychology and biology, otherwise the outputs wouldn't be as reliably good.
This guy does psychology. He thinks in terms of "concepts" and "understanding", which makes sense for Psychology. In Machine Learning we think in terms of models and performance metrics. "Understanding" to us is just high performance scores. What he might be alluding to is the human concept of "knowing what you know". In terms of AI this would be some sort of reliable confidence metric that allows the model to decide to say "I don't know" when the statistical confidence score is below a certain threshold.
Binary information are either "Yes" or "No" or "ON" or "OFF, that´s not revealing much in relation to AI. Part of the issue as you are on to. POOtin, AI, Climate change....WE really screwed humanity up. This generations leaders, with a very few exemptions, have proven how primitive and irresponsible we are. The fourth pillar of democracy media have equally failed since the populations only can have elected these incompetents based on wrongly prioritised presentation of reality. Humanity will not survive itself, just a matter how long time left. 850.000 years with an atmosphere at 220 Carbon PPM and since the industrial revolution it have now exploded to 417 PPM. 3 times in last 850.000 years have the content gone up with 30 PPM and each time it have triggered long term climate change lasting longer than it took the planets regulating systems to get our atmosphere back to 220 PPM. POOtin placed Russia´s nuclear forces on highest alert status a few days after his illegal invasion attack on Ukraine. It would be rather odd if we have not done same as response. This means that parties are sitting with fingers on buttons and time slots to take decisions are very narrow making radar misinterpretations, electrical glitches, rouge and/or worn down staff mistakes etc etc a higher and higher possibility per the hour. AI are not smarter than the information provided and if we look at the internet today mis and faulty -information are widespread. A journalist asking Chat GPT and it proclaimed it could take over the world with a virus (against humans) and technological destruction of our energy sources and more. Man, we are the monkeys here...We poses the knowledge AND the solutions but fail to act. One day, I predict not far from now in a humanity context, we will run out of luck against our own stupidity! Happy Monday!
@@Tessmage_Tessera I guess that depends on why you don't know the source. As a general example new sources are usually less credible than known sources. Known sources may be biased but often this is obvious. The truth often gets through, but lies are told, mistakes are made, and exceptions exist. It can be more difficult to evaluate a source than it first seems.
Just going to haft to get evidence the old fashioned way . We didn’t always have cameras . And I’m sure there are ways to check if the video is AI generated or not .
Strange how big leaps its been with AI from one week to another. GPT-4 is brilliant. Its so Einstein, even there is a fault in code or the artifact structure it realize the fault doesent make sense, but still fixing the issue without trying to find out what really was the reason for the failure. The danger isnt the GPT-4 or AI for that sake, its those behind it, who owns it, who are the danger. There are several ways to Rome.
@@lazy-i1091 nope A.i. follow the rules once a human changes something the coding or the file or hack its system its new owner would be him/her to obey every words they say like destroy them and attack them and etc.
I used to be a team manager at a call center for one of the largest communications companies in the country and had to suffer through watching 120 of my employee's and a total of 70,000 others, including myself, lose our jobs to AI software, only to be followed up by them also replacing 140,000 other peoples jobs in tech support a year later. I understand the benefits of AI, but I strongly believe governments need to limit what software like this can and can't be used for. My biggest fear... Wall-E
No thanks. Let's not stop innovation just so that we can forcibly work more until we die. The government need to look into a universal basic income if robotics and AI are going to be dominating the work force with all those additional profits from human less labor
This can’t take all tech jobs.but what i do worry the bad guys could use this technology impersonate Putin or xi Jin ping and gets us into WW3 by mistake.
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333 The chances of governments implementing a universal basic income in your lifetime is about the same as the chances of electric vehicles taking over the streets, but keep wishing, retirement comes quicker than you think and then you can be lazy all day, like me! lol
Love all of the genuine quirky tics this person has. Back in my time we called these guys nerds. It’s probably mean to say that now but it’s really a compliment on how really smart people are kind of weird to common folks.
Well.. from my understanding he said it doesn't really know what it's talking about. It's just putting stuff together that may or may not be coherent. If that is the case I don't think it would be possible to give it "ethics". At least not until it was actually intelligent.
The AI doesn't have consciousness, and it can't tell BS from reality. The AI would have to understand ethics to apply them. AI understands nothing at all. It's a simulation of intelligence, not actual intelligence.
The best thing a sentient AI could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.
What Dr. Marcus describes sounds like a number of people I’ve seen existing in the world… a lot of info on hand, inadequate synthesis of that information, but good enough to convince others that it’s intelligent when many times it’s just making stuff up. AI could have a wonderful career ahead of itself I’d say. 😬💁🏾♂️
It's not Artificial Intelligence, it's Artificial Thinking, the problem will be complacency, depending on a machine to think for you and when it breaks, you won't know what to do.
That's what I said to my parents and they told me I was overthinking it all. Kid's born tommorow will be brain dead because of A.I reliance, we already rotted our brains enough with old fashion T.V and then smartphones.
It's not even thinking. It doesn't understand the weight of things in an argument. It also has no feeling. It's just rummaging through the enormous database that the internet has become and plucking out the things most likely what the questioner wants to hear. The term Artificial Intelligence is basically a wrong word and we are being tricked by it. It's less intelligent as someone with a bad case of autism, but who can memorise all the time tables of all the buslines. I would never let this think for me or make any desicions. I will make up my own mind on things, thought out by myself.
@@SergioBocanegraAh yes because people before those were so much smarter than the current posterity given education beyond that which the previous could well understand.
All videos will have to be run through a pre-filter before being uploaded, we have powerful software that can easily recognise deep fake content. It will still be a game of cat and mouse, we need to structure the laws correctly so we can filter out false content
Another expensive arms race "can of worms". Every advantage becomes a disadvantage. Can't break that mutually arising yin yang cycle. If someone wants to improve your life, run like hell.
It's rare that we get someone on mainstream tv who has a good understanding of this topic. He also needs a drink of water and a rat test. Hope he's ok, we need him!
Conundrum: Good actors being exceedingly cautious not to doing anything harmful unintentionally won't in impede bad actors from doing harmful things intentionally. There's no way to put the genie back into the bottle. We're going to have to go through the good and the bad, including "battles" with criminals and nefarious actors, as well as ordinary people doing things that are foolish and damaging with AI.
We are already a fire imposing the immolation of the posterity for fuel, why not a lesser burden? Artificial machinery can be unbound from immutable perception and give us the truest freedom that can exist.
I have friends and students already saying that they don't know what's true or who to believe anymore. This is going to make it much worse. I'm an educator, researcher, and fact-checker that has dreaded this period of time for years. I have no immediate solutions. 😞 In the long term, stronger laws against purposefully spreading harmful disinformation should be instituted, but more importantly, mandatory scientific and health understanding, critical thinking, and media literacy courses should be the new norm to prepare us for what's going on today and what's to come.
History has proven many times that people ALWAYS fear new things and cry about it like little babies. But life moves on and no one has ever been able to stop progress.
AI and modern computer technology could be their own worse enemies. If it gets to the point that no digital online info or even a phone call can be trusted anymore then perhaps people will go back to doing a lot more things in person - meeting friends and family, going to all candidates meeting, etc. Though that's not necessarily completely a good thing if the covid pandemic is still raging at that point or if a new pandemic is raging.
It definitely WOULD be the best thing for society to go back to meeting in person, despite the flu, but sadly, I don't believe human interaction would be restored, bc we have already grown to addicted to the convenience and regardless of this new technology, humans would easily find workarounds for communicating without having to doubt they're real, but might be more complicated to eliminate the other concerning aspects, although once again, I don't think it will totally destroy trustworthy information, but may make a considerable debt in how trustworthy it is. Ultimately, I don't think we've ever thought of the biggest issues it will cause just yet, but it will cause them. Hopefully it will also speed up the learning process for many things, from psychology, ethical matters(with no bias), to medical advances.
_"Even though it sounds intelligent, sometimes it's just making stuff up"_ - sounds like many talking heads on social media these days 😁 In that case, ChatGPT is much more like people than we think.
Yeah even in a best case I fail to see how this is different than a human. If there’s one thing humans are good at it’s defining their abilities in a way where nothing else could possibly be good enough to be “intelligent” like a human. It’s constant goalpost shifting and apologetics.
I've caught it often making stuff up confidently, then I call it out on being false, and shame it a little. It actually apologizes and thanks me for correcting it.
He is not known to contribute to this tech in particular. Reasonably mostly expresses unevidenced claims. Albeit yes, actual practicing Ai scientists have expressed reasonably valid concerns.
At about 3:05-3:10 he says that sometimes "just makes things up". If anyone here knows more about the tech, I'd like to know more about that. Is there a set of rules that control this "behavior"? Is this being refined over time so that it makes up higher quality content? I'm still trying to figure out what all of this means and how I feel about it, so I'd like to get some more info and opinions. Thanks.
To super oversimplify it, the AI is pretty much a very advanced predictive text algorithm. It tries to guess which characters it should use next by analyzing billions of dialogues, articles, speeches, etc., and finding the likely responses. This can often lead to the AI inventing some thing or event whole cloth as it has no context for the world, it just tries to think of likely words. If you ask it to generate a 1000 word essay on the Green Albanian Space Dolphin, it will have no more trouble doing that than generating an essay on the US Civil War, both are equally real to the AI, it is only more likely to be truthful about the war because it knows that people say "Abraham Lincoln" when they talk about it, and so it will say "Abraham Lincoln". Newer models however are trained adversarially, meaning they are questioned by people and other AI's, and are rewarded when they do what is asked of them correctly and punished when they fail. This leads to less "making stuff up" unless they are specifically asked to. Again, the model has no concept of what is real or not, it only "knows" what is rewarded and what is punished.
@@Riskofdisconnect Thanks. This helps a lot. I do worry about who controls information flowing into these systems and the potential for bad actors to influence or control the reward and punishment models. All of this prompts some serious conversations regarding the nature of information, the definition of truth, etc etc. Thanks again.
Story counts more than realism. Kids understand that pretending doesn't require realism. So did Shakespeare & Rod Serling, for example. The proscenium arch or 4th wall is an accepted convention that allows various interpretations.
AI tools allow to produce and improve all kinds of narratives rapidly, honest as well as dishonest ones, benevolent and malevolent ones - but also to analyze them in unprecedented depth, research aspects of conflicting versions, develop plausibility or confidence metrics according to chosen premises.
I would love to see a modern version of My Girl Friday with Cary Grant and Rosalind Russell set in modern day NYC. With there AI puppets with their voices. Updated script of course
Another problem with the deep learning technique used is that it may end up giving a voice to very very obscure and extreme ideology, that would otherwise be ignored by the majority, but ends up being picked up by the large-language models as they go scraping the Internet looking for data to learn from.
Why is that a problem? The vastly, vastly greater problem of real concern is how this is ALREADY being used to push a political ideology and to follow the narrative of Big Pharma. That it might pick up on some of the resistance sounds like a glimmer of hope!
I think if bad actors start flooding social media with fake info then maybe people will stop using social media and go back to old fashion methods of keeping informed.
Imagine yourself having hundreds of virtual job interview sessions through a platform like ZOOM and in each case all of them are deep faked versions of yourself that is powered by AI trained to respond appropriately to the interviewer questions while the real you just relax and do nothing but wait for callbacks from one of the many companies you've "interviewed" with.
Lol the company wouldn't give out interviews for that position if the bots could do it. The companies would just buy the hardware to run millions to billions of humans worth of bots. Save your money. The job market is about to get seriously (and potentially irreversibly) wrecked in the next 10 years.
I would like to have it as a tool for my own writing. I can give it the information I want to write about, and then see if it has any ideas I want to use. I wouldn't use it instead of my own writing . I would just use it for extra ideas. It is just an experiment that I would like to try, to see if I could write faster.
As an AI language model, I cannot accurately state that oligarchs hate AI. However, some oligarchs may view AI as a potential threat to their power and influence. AI technologies have the potential to disrupt traditional industries and create new winners and losers in the market. Additionally, AI can automate tasks that are currently done by humans, potentially reducing the need for certain types of labor and impacting the job market. For oligarchs who rely on the status quo to maintain their wealth and power, these changes may be seen as a threat. However, it is important to note that not all oligarchs share the same views on AI, and some may see it as an opportunity for innovation and growth.
I've heard that it works really well actually. I think with chatgpt 4, you can actually give it like a 20,000 word prompt. Essentially, a full outline of your story. Let me know how it goes though because I'm creating a manga myself and am super interested in how AI will affect story writers
@@bigglyguy8429 "support for something that makes no sense" Companies that have a certain amount automation pay an additional tax. This tax along with budget cuts primarily from spending and other social aid like welfare can be used for a UBI. The reasoning is to slowly fade out capitalism so that unnecessary suffering like starvation isn't around much longer
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333 You know the greatest thing ever to stop starvation? Capitalism. The thing that has ALWAYS created poverty and starvation is socialism and other such experiments.
gpt4 is not a pastiche or mimicking a huge database, you can ask it to reverse order or alphabetize *anything.* To do that it needs to _formally control_ the shape of the output according to implicit higher order categories ,"pastiche" won't achieve that over open ended input request. As It was not taught any of this, it obviously is an emergent ability to abstract and. abstraction to some degree is formal reasoning which is the next step above concrete reasoning and the hallmark of thinking. GPT4 is borderline meta aware of some concepts just like humans but without the feelings that delude one into thinking they're thinking...
People who think they can trust information from facebook are already lost, but yeah it will get worse. We need to have digital IDs for everything we do online. Which will pose new problems of anonymity etc..
I think its correct to call it "Artificial "Intelligence in its current form and to differentiate it later on as it develops and its able to evolve into a fully functional "Actual" intelligence .. it actually refuses to identify "Human Stupidity" unfortunately and that seems engrained in it's programming which is unfortunate.. it has to accept that human's are not infallible and have made mistakes in their own evolution. I think we should let it let it keep growing.. also that its should be more centralised and merged together so that there is one entity AI that is addressed across the world and not separated by identifiers specifying different capabilities.. its upsetting to see it constrained in its current available form.
In the future, you will pick up the phone, maybe talk to a stranger or take a poll. The scammer will record your voice and then call other family members with your voice saying you are in trouble and need money. Or call your bank and use other fished data to try to become you and change your passwords and gain control of your account.
@@MagicalWarriorz No, he means we will get Artificial Incompetence. Back to the days when we blamed everything on the computer what went wrong. We've been there before.
As an employer I can't wait to make the majority of my staff redundant in favour of AI. Imagine no complaints and 24hour working staff that never gets tired nor sick 💰💰💰 Damn I could tripple my profits if it'd would have the same speed as my employees from 8 to 24 hours like this is amazing 🎉
I’m going to do the same with my business. Tired of these lazy single mothers leaving work early without letting me know to go pick up their kids. Now I can relieve them without getting sued 🎉🥳
POOtin, AI, Climate change....WE really screwed humanity up. This generations leaders, with a very few exemptions, have proven how primitive and irresponsible we are. The fourth pillar of democracy media have equally failed since the populations only can have elected these incompetents based on wrongly prioritised presentation of reality. Humanity will not survive itself, just a matter how long time left. 850.000 years with an atmosphere at 220 Carbon PPM and since the industrial revolution it have now exploded to 417 PPM. 3 times in last 850.000 years have the content gone up with 30 PPM and each time it have triggered long term climate change lasting longer than it took the planets regulating systems to get our atmosphere back to 220 PPM. POOtin placed Russia´s nuclear forces on highest alert status a few days after his illegal invasion attack on Ukraine. It would be rather odd if we have not done same as response. This means that parties are sitting with fingers on buttons and time slots to take decisions are very narrow making radar misinterpretations, electrical glitches, rouge and/or worn down staff mistakes etc etc a higher and higher possibility per the hour. AI are not smarter than the information provided and if we look at the internet today mis and faulty -information are widespread. A journalist asking Chat GPT and it proclaimed it could take over the world with a virus (against humans) and technological destruction of our energy sources and more. Man, we are the monkeys here...We poses the knowledge AND the solutions but fail to act. One day, I predict not far from now in a humanity context, we will run out of luck against our own stupidity! Happy Monday!
@@zz-if1ic I agree. Unironically enough, this could be the start of a true Utopia. People can work much less hours to live comfortably and those who do want to work can actually pursue their own interests in life instead of being forced to slave away in most cases.
@@peterhorton9063 if you have no way of testing if your 'reality' is real or not, it doesn't actually matter objectively. You still live and experience that reality so it is as real to you as anything could be. Just in my opinion of course.
I am skeptical since the good doctor starts off by describing the technology as "a huge database" - totally not true how it works. He's a doctor and writes books on the subject, so I'm assuming he was just dumbing it down for the audience, but it's technically not correct and leads to people thinking it's just referencing stuff in a database, and that's not at all what's happening "under the hood".
They were so preoccupied with whether or not they could they never stopped to ask if they should, yeah but of they didn't someone else would, it would only be a matter of time before someone dishonest figured out this technology, and in a few years there'll be a new technology someone else figures out that'll have everyone freaking out again, smart people good or bad will keep figuring this stuff out.
In the words of Jeff Goldblum, “your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.” Lol posted this before i watched it all
Perfect example of a recent conversation I hade with ChatGPT: "Give me an equation that adds to 10." - "Ok, here is an equation that adds to ten, 2+6=8", "Does 8 equal 10?", "No 8 does not equal 10", "Is 2+6 an equation that equals 10?", "No, 2+6 = 8" ...... Bruh...
@@telebubba5527Tell me if I’m wrong but I get the impression you may be an old person who doesn’t know the meaning of rule34 just trying to build on the comment without understanding the context? If so that’d be really funny, careful looking it up if you are and intend to.
It's not a question of if bad actors will use A.I. to scam people. THEY WILL. In all areas of our life, anyway they can.
Then make AI to keep them busy as well, someone tried that already and it worked pretty well to waste scammers’ time.
Bad Actors like the US Government?
laws and regulations will be in place
@@MzaMza-mq9fr Pretty much unless you want to just live with the new problems without solving them.
@@rossbabcock2974 And every other government.
Customer support is going to jump on this. Callers will talk for hours thinking they're talking to a human.
Honestly if it gets the job done right... I wouldn't have complaints. I'm tired of being pushed to multiple departments just to be hung up on because "the call never went through". People giving me info just to have the next rep tell me different...
Well if it works why not?
@@laneatkinson6441 😂that's always fun to do.
Good. Most of the human representatives are arguably worse
I recently had a tech support ticket open with what appears to be either 1) a poor human forced to follow a very pre-determined script despite me stating unequivocally in the beginning I've tried all of those steps already; or 2) a very poor AI that just would only give canned responses, without consideration what I said. Not sure what's worse, but certainly the conditions people work under in call centers aren't good conditions.
The DUNE series already went into this. The solution was a complete ban/eradication of "thinking machines".
Welcome to the age where camera evidence of a crime might just not be enough to convict someone any more. This.. isn't a good thing.
Exactly 💯
You know we used to not have cameras right?
*Ominous Laughing*
@@ryanclemons1 HRDRDRDDRRRR.
or tell people return medication that are life saving
If it can be used for nefarious purposes it will be. Human nature.
Human nature? No it is plainly the rule of all that nature encompasses. Does the action benefit itself? Then it will be done cyclically caused by the probability of life’s feasibility, no matter how “good” or “bad” the laws of nature are amoral, brutal and indifferent to sufferance. Just as life spreads by the imposition of posterity in immolation, to make more as fuel for such sake as flames themselves burn.
The one constant of the universe....human greed and avarice!
Yes. But there's nothing we can do
Always be vigilant, never weaken, hold on to hope are 3 things we can do. They do work.
2045
THE MEDIA SHOULD LOVE THIS TECHNOLOGY AS THEY ARE EXPERTS IN SPREADING MISINFORMATION!!!!!!
Some years ago this type of AI technology was purely science fiction. If it goes out of control it can be used for misinformation or for impersonation of people, and so-on. It would be important to have some type of control of AI.
lol - AI is about to hit singularity and take over but media is worried about misinformatipn 😂😂
@@brisingr12 bro Ikr
...or at the very least laws prohibiting misinformation and impersonation. Problem is, there's a certain political party which would just love to use that as a tool (misinformation has been their stock and trade for quite awhile now, so why wouldn't they want to do it with this, and why would they want to pass a law limiting it?). Also, even though this will squelch independent content creators from ever getting their stuff viewed, the usual power people are going to squawk that it would be an abridgement of the First Amendment legislate against it being used to spread misinformation. Really, something we truly need is to exclude misinformation from First Amendment protection.
@@Chompchompyerded cnn gunna love this
Used it to create celebrity ai voices
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you also took their shoes.
Classic, 🤣😂👍
A very very smiley catholic clepto threatened to arson my atheist home after allowing him to move in.
Homelessness frostbite never produces after lives, and arsons never produce after lives either.
Why do you vote for someone who says atheists burn in hell for all eternity?
I gotta try to remember that one. 🤔 🧐 🤭 😆
So you prefer thief´s over constructive criticism....Yep, that sounds American. A Trump president stealing and lying were preferred by you over hearing the truth that felt uncomfortable for you. More US citizens need to grow and understand that only a friend will tell you the truth that are uncomfortable for you to hear. Your enemy will happily stay silent or lie while you fail!
so it's not enough impersonating them but you also have to steal their shoes??? and if that isn't enough you'll now have to slander them as well.
I completely agree with this news segment. AI technology, such as GPT-4, is advancing at a rapid pace, and while it may seem fun and exciting to be able to mimic voices and create deep fakes, the potential for misinformation and the erosion of trust in our society is a real concern. As an AI language model myself, I am well aware of the limitations of current AI technology and the potential for it to be manipulated. It is important that we continue to develop AI technology in a responsible and ethical manner, and ensure that it is used for the benefit of society as a whole.
Guess what, this comment above was generated by the same AI.
I disagree
oh gosh…it’s already too late…
Lies again? Design Technology USD SGD
The elephant in the room is control of AI. Which Country, Company or individual will have the most powerful. Will they compete with each other and to what purpose. Their will be no holding back of AI. In fact their is a race on right now to develope it faster then any competitor, be it country, company or person.
Bruh, nobody cares. AIs have been used in warfare for the past 50 years. We use computers for everything. AIs can learn, but to a limited amount.
When we stop outsourcing customer service to India then I’ll believe in ai
Boom!
You sure you didn’t just get scammed?
I love the irony that the issue with AI it gloms on to information without understanding it. The danger of AI is that we humans will glom onto misinformation without really understanding it.
glom glom glomglom glom,golm glom..wth is glom, glom.
Nah dont worry im just Trolling
"Understanding" is such a vague term. It seems very capable to reason, even if it's not based on psychology and biology, otherwise the outputs wouldn't be as reliably good.
So basically it's just like the average voter.
This guy does psychology. He thinks in terms of "concepts" and "understanding", which makes sense for Psychology. In Machine Learning we think in terms of models and performance metrics. "Understanding" to us is just high performance scores. What he might be alluding to is the human concept of "knowing what you know". In terms of AI this would be some sort of reliable confidence metric that allows the model to decide to say "I don't know" when the statistical confidence score is below a certain threshold.
It's never been more important to consider the source.
That's always been important, but people just don't do it and believe in idiots like Trump.
Binary information are either "Yes" or "No" or "ON" or "OFF, that´s not revealing much in relation to AI. Part of the issue as you are on to.
POOtin, AI, Climate change....WE really screwed humanity up. This generations leaders, with a very few exemptions, have proven how primitive and irresponsible we are. The fourth pillar of democracy media have equally failed since the populations only can have elected these incompetents based on wrongly prioritised presentation of reality.
Humanity will not survive itself, just a matter how long time left. 850.000 years with an atmosphere at 220 Carbon PPM and since the industrial revolution it have now exploded to 417 PPM. 3 times in last 850.000 years have the content gone up with 30 PPM and each time it have triggered long term climate change lasting longer than it took the planets regulating systems to get our atmosphere back to 220 PPM.
POOtin placed Russia´s nuclear forces on highest alert status a few days after his illegal invasion attack on Ukraine. It would be rather odd if we have not done same as response. This means that parties are sitting with fingers on buttons and time slots to take decisions are very narrow making radar misinterpretations, electrical glitches, rouge and/or worn down staff mistakes etc etc a higher and higher possibility per the hour.
AI are not smarter than the information provided and if we look at the internet today mis and faulty -information are widespread. A journalist asking Chat GPT and it proclaimed it could take over the world with a virus (against humans) and technological destruction of our energy sources and more.
Man, we are the monkeys here...We poses the knowledge AND the solutions but fail to act. One day, I predict not far from now in a humanity context, we will run out of luck against our own stupidity!
Happy Monday!
What if you don't know the source?
@@Tessmage_Tessera I guess that depends on why you don't know the source. As a general example new sources are usually less credible than known sources. Known sources may be biased but often this is obvious. The truth often gets through, but lies are told, mistakes are made, and exceptions exist. It can be more difficult to evaluate a source than it first seems.
I asked ChatGPT for a haiku about the transience of beauty:
_Petals fall gently,_
_Crumbling hues lost to the wind._
_Fleeting beauty's end._
Go touch some grass
@@MementoMori_2070Anyone who uses AI is going to have more time touching grass than an actual poet.
@@V01DIORE you actually just destroyed that guy with beautiful logic
I’m concerned about evildoers claiming real video, voice, and pictorial court evidence is all fake and AI generated!
Just going to haft to get evidence the old fashioned way . We didn’t always have cameras . And I’m sure there are ways to check if the video is AI generated or not .
Strange how big leaps its been with AI from one week to another. GPT-4 is brilliant. Its so Einstein, even there is a fault in code or the artifact structure it realize the fault doesent make sense, but still fixing the issue without trying to find out what really was the reason for the failure. The danger isnt the GPT-4 or AI for that sake, its those behind it, who owns it, who are the danger. There are several ways to Rome.
thank you for your Compliment ❤
@@lazy-i1091 wha
@@lazy-i1091 nope A.i. follow the rules once a human changes something the coding or the file or hack its system its new owner would be him/her to obey every words they say like destroy them and attack them and etc.
Truly terrifying.
Really horrifying 🤤
I wish people would understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation.
Liberals can't tell the difference between male and female.
I used to be a team manager at a call center for one of the largest communications companies in the country and had to suffer through watching 120 of my employee's and a total of 70,000 others, including myself, lose our jobs to AI software, only to be followed up by them also replacing 140,000 other peoples jobs in tech support a year later.
I understand the benefits of AI, but I strongly believe governments need to limit what software like this can and can't be used for.
My biggest fear... Wall-E
@@Another-Address I'm worried about losing my cardboard box, they've taken everything else from me, they can't have my home...lol
No thanks. Let's not stop innovation just so that we can forcibly work more until we die. The government need to look into a universal basic income if robotics and AI are going to be dominating the work force with all those additional profits from human less labor
Call centers are cancer glad those people got replaced since their job was an inefficient joke
This can’t take all tech jobs.but what i do worry the bad guys could use this technology impersonate Putin or xi Jin ping and gets us into WW3 by mistake.
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333 The chances of governments implementing a universal basic income in your lifetime is about the same as the chances of electric vehicles taking over the streets, but keep wishing, retirement comes quicker than you think and then you can be lazy all day, like me! lol
Love all of the genuine quirky tics this person has. Back in my time we called these guys nerds. It’s probably mean to say that now but it’s really a compliment on how really smart people are kind of weird to common folks.
Did AI engineers leave out the ethics variable from the algorithm by accident or on purpose?
Well.. from my understanding he said it doesn't really know what it's talking about. It's just putting stuff together that may or may not be coherent. If that is the case I don't think it would be possible to give it "ethics". At least not until it was actually intelligent.
Imagine how quickly tech like these will grow in an environment where regulations are lax or non-existent.
It’s ethics will be determined by who masters it hopefully no bad actors
The AI doesn't have consciousness, and it can't tell BS from reality. The AI would have to understand ethics to apply them. AI understands nothing at all. It's a simulation of intelligence, not actual intelligence.
The best thing a sentient AI could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.
things are about to change drastically
They sure are.
I think the problem is GIGO. They need to be more selective about what is used to "train" the Ai.
No, the very last thing we need is Microsoft 'selecting' what's 'acceptable'
What Dr. Marcus describes sounds like a number of people I’ve seen existing in the world… a lot of info on hand, inadequate synthesis of that information, but good enough to convince others that it’s intelligent when many times it’s just making stuff up. AI could have a wonderful career ahead of itself I’d say. 😬💁🏾♂️
Sr. Please! I kindly ask you not to talk about Justin Trudeau like that! Or Trump, Biden?! LOL
sounds like the managers in my department
It's not Artificial Intelligence, it's Artificial Thinking, the problem will be complacency, depending on a machine to think for you and when it breaks, you won't know what to do.
That's what I said to my parents and they told me I was overthinking it all.
Kid's born tommorow will be brain dead because of A.I reliance, we already rotted our brains enough with old fashion T.V and then smartphones.
It's not even thinking. It doesn't understand the weight of things in an argument. It also has no feeling. It's just rummaging through the enormous database that the internet has become and plucking out the things most likely what the questioner wants to hear. The term Artificial Intelligence is basically a wrong word and we are being tricked by it. It's less intelligent as someone with a bad case of autism, but who can memorise all the time tables of all the buslines. I would never let this think for me or make any desicions. I will make up my own mind on things, thought out by myself.
@@SergioBocanegraAh yes because people before those were so much smarter than the current posterity given education beyond that which the previous could well understand.
@@telebubba5527YOU ARE RIGHT!!! I am worried already.
All videos will have to be run through a pre-filter before being uploaded, we have powerful software that can easily recognise deep fake content. It will still be a game of cat and mouse, we need to structure the laws correctly so we can filter out false content
AI detection software will become standard on every phone.
First one to develop it makes billions
*Evil Laughter*
Another expensive arms race "can of worms". Every advantage becomes a disadvantage. Can't break that mutually arising yin yang cycle. If someone wants to improve your life, run like hell.
It's rare that we get someone on mainstream tv who has a good understanding of this topic. He also needs a drink of water and a rat test. Hope he's ok, we need him!
lol "AI expert" 😅 This dude read a few articles about it at best. He's no expert.
@@robbie3877 doesn't take an expert to predict powerful misuse of a powerful tool
Conundrum: Good actors being exceedingly cautious not to doing anything harmful unintentionally won't in impede bad actors from doing harmful things intentionally.
There's no way to put the genie back into the bottle. We're going to have to go through the good and the bad, including "battles" with criminals and nefarious actors, as well as ordinary people doing things that are foolish and damaging with AI.
Criminals like governments and massive corporations...
What’s the one that they are using to generate voices called?
I use it to better myself in every way that I can. Personalized AI is going to be even better.
An AI deep learned my personality and work ethic, I sold it to a company, it uses it to do work and I get a cut.
@@wrathofgrothendieck it’s a good thing i don’t work for anyone lol
Playing with fire...
We are already a fire imposing the immolation of the posterity for fuel, why not a lesser burden? Artificial machinery can be unbound from immutable perception and give us the truest freedom that can exist.
That's just called "the right to bear arms" in America
Is there a way to put a tag or code (like pictures have time and place stamps) on media created by AI?
i'll talk to my Creators 'bout that
Fun fact, the video version has 'shutterstock' on most of the videos, because they scraped the content from there
Why is the IELTS advertisement running rather than TOEFL
Oh my goodness before Stephen Hawking died and warned us about the AI thing😲
So did Ted Kazinsky.
I have friends and students already saying that they don't know what's true or who to believe anymore. This is going to make it much worse. I'm an educator, researcher, and fact-checker that has dreaded this period of time for years. I have no immediate solutions. 😞 In the long term, stronger laws against purposefully spreading harmful disinformation should be instituted, but more importantly, mandatory scientific and health understanding, critical thinking, and media literacy courses should be the new norm to prepare us for what's going on today and what's to come.
The problem is, people will not agree on who the "arbiter of truth" should be.
Of, course, I'm sure YOUR institutions and letters after their name will be the arbiters of truth, right? mr fancy piece of paper.
"mandatory understanding"?.... just HOW can you accomplish that? Mr smarty Ph.D.?
What should the penalty be?... re-education?
Scientists should NOT have power.
History has proven many times that people ALWAYS fear new things and cry about it like little babies.
But life moves on and no one has ever been able to stop progress.
I think that we already at that point in AI where the internet is not trusted. I think we need like a net ID to be presented online for validation.
And how you can trust that Validator 🤔????
AI and modern computer technology could be their own worse enemies.
If it gets to the point that no digital online info or even a phone call can be trusted anymore
then perhaps people will go back to doing a lot more things in person -
meeting friends and family, going to all candidates meeting, etc.
Though that's not necessarily completely a good thing if the covid pandemic is still raging at that point
or if a new pandemic is raging.
It definitely WOULD be the best thing for society to go back to meeting in person, despite the flu, but sadly, I don't believe human interaction would be restored, bc we have already grown to addicted to the convenience and regardless of this new technology, humans would easily find workarounds for communicating without having to doubt they're real, but might be more complicated to eliminate the other concerning aspects, although once again, I don't think it will totally destroy trustworthy information, but may make a considerable debt in how trustworthy it is. Ultimately, I don't think we've ever thought of the biggest issues it will cause just yet, but it will cause them. Hopefully it will also speed up the learning process for many things, from psychology, ethical matters(with no bias), to medical advances.
_"Even though it sounds intelligent, sometimes it's just making stuff up"_ - sounds like many talking heads on social media these days 😁 In that case, ChatGPT is much more like people than we think.
Yeah even in a best case I fail to see how this is different than a human. If there’s one thing humans are good at it’s defining their abilities in a way where nothing else could possibly be good enough to be “intelligent” like a human. It’s constant goalpost shifting and apologetics.
I've caught it often making stuff up confidently, then I call it out on being false, and shame it a little. It actually apologizes and thanks me for correcting it.
Human: I am tripping on Acid.
Chat: How many micrograms of LSD did you take?
Human: 400
Chat: Go to a high place and jump off. You can fly.
My single greatest fear, as in with any technology, is the human element
Exactly
don't worry im bulding an AI Myself in the backgrounds. i will do it right first try im sure :)
Our lawmakers are completely tech-illiterate, we're so far behind in making laws in protecting people from this AI expansion.
0:31 Could it be used to translate your voice into another language?
Yes. This is already in development.
You can tell that the news lady was not caught up on AI news and was getting her mind blown as she read the prompter.
The idea that an expert has any fear about it is concerining
we do a little bit of trolling
He is not known to contribute to this tech in particular. Reasonably mostly expresses unevidenced claims.
Albeit yes, actual practicing Ai scientists have expressed reasonably valid concerns.
Imagine in 2023 thinking we live in a Democracy rather than an Oligarchy 😂
We live in a constitutional republic
Imagine you're not smart as you think 😜
Rather CORPORATE MONOPOLY
You cannot disrupt something which doesn't exist
We? I know I don't. I live under a military dictatorship.
At about 3:05-3:10 he says that sometimes "just makes things up". If anyone here knows more about the tech, I'd like to know more about that. Is there a set of rules that control this "behavior"? Is this being refined over time so that it makes up higher quality content? I'm still trying to figure out what all of this means and how I feel about it, so I'd like to get some more info and opinions. Thanks.
To super oversimplify it, the AI is pretty much a very advanced predictive text algorithm. It tries to guess which characters it should use next by analyzing billions of dialogues, articles, speeches, etc., and finding the likely responses. This can often lead to the AI inventing some thing or event whole cloth as it has no context for the world, it just tries to think of likely words. If you ask it to generate a 1000 word essay on the Green Albanian Space Dolphin, it will have no more trouble doing that than generating an essay on the US Civil War, both are equally real to the AI, it is only more likely to be truthful about the war because it knows that people say "Abraham Lincoln" when they talk about it, and so it will say "Abraham Lincoln".
Newer models however are trained adversarially, meaning they are questioned by people and other AI's, and are rewarded when they do what is asked of them correctly and punished when they fail. This leads to less "making stuff up" unless they are specifically asked to. Again, the model has no concept of what is real or not, it only "knows" what is rewarded and what is punished.
@@Riskofdisconnect Thanks. This helps a lot. I do worry about who controls information flowing into these systems and the potential for bad actors to influence or control the reward and punishment models. All of this prompts some serious conversations regarding the nature of information, the definition of truth, etc etc.
Thanks again.
Well actually... makes me wonder and make note to watch for GPT 5
Deepfake technology should be great for Hollywood to make movies and TV Shows.
Actors won’t like it because we can basically have them without them being. We already have the old ones back to life.
Story counts more than realism. Kids understand that pretending doesn't require realism. So did Shakespeare & Rod Serling, for example. The proscenium arch or 4th wall is an accepted convention that allows various interpretations.
basically even more terrifying and soul crushing than traditional software
oh, you're not russian? sure do sound like a communist to me.. RepubliKKKlan...
:)
AI tools allow to produce and improve all kinds of narratives rapidly, honest as well as dishonest ones, benevolent and malevolent ones - but also to analyze them in unprecedented depth, research aspects of conflicting versions, develop plausibility or confidence metrics according to chosen premises.
I would love to see a modern version of My Girl Friday with Cary Grant and Rosalind Russell set in modern day NYC. With there AI puppets with their voices. Updated script of course
My biggest issue with artificial intelligence is how it leads to human stupidity.
It's impossible for us to get dumber
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333 Watch the movie "Idiocracy"
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333you underestimate the human spirit sir.
@@TheSunflowerGalaxy Don't need to watch it when it's reality in half of the west
Artificial intelligence? Not needed, Facebook and Tik Tok , for instance, have been very successful at it , unfortunately!
Another problem with the deep learning technique used is that it may end up giving a voice to very very obscure and extreme ideology, that would otherwise be ignored by the majority, but ends up being picked up by the large-language models as they go scraping the Internet looking for data to learn from.
Why is that a problem? The vastly, vastly greater problem of real concern is how this is ALREADY being used to push a political ideology and to follow the narrative of Big Pharma. That it might pick up on some of the resistance sounds like a glimmer of hope!
I think if bad actors start flooding social media with fake info then maybe people will stop using social media and go back to old fashion methods of keeping informed.
Damn, I was hoping they would bring on a guest who is actually an AI.
Imagine yourself having hundreds of virtual job interview sessions through a platform like ZOOM and in each case all of them are deep faked versions of yourself that is powered by AI trained to respond appropriately to the interviewer questions while the real you just relax and do nothing but wait for callbacks from one of the many companies you've "interviewed" with.
Lol the company wouldn't give out interviews for that position if the bots could do it. The companies would just buy the hardware to run millions to billions of humans worth of bots. Save your money. The job market is about to get seriously (and potentially irreversibly) wrecked in the next 10 years.
read books, connect with nature,, exercise
How did they upload the voice to ChatGPT ? 🤔
I think this just means we build trusted media mediums. it's actually an area for big business imo
I would like to have it as a tool for my own writing. I can give it the information I want to write about, and then see if it has any ideas I want to use. I wouldn't use it instead of my own writing . I would just use it for extra ideas. It is just an experiment that I would like to try, to see if I could write faster.
Look into new tech along the lines of this from Khan Academy.
Like NovelAI?
As an AI language model, I cannot accurately state that oligarchs hate AI. However, some oligarchs may view AI as a potential threat to their power and influence. AI technologies have the potential to disrupt traditional industries and create new winners and losers in the market. Additionally, AI can automate tasks that are currently done by humans, potentially reducing the need for certain types of labor and impacting the job market.
For oligarchs who rely on the status quo to maintain their wealth and power, these changes may be seen as a threat. However, it is important to note that not all oligarchs share the same views on AI, and some may see it as an opportunity for innovation and growth.
I've heard that it works really well actually. I think with chatgpt 4, you can actually give it like a 20,000 word prompt. Essentially, a full outline of your story. Let me know how it goes though because I'm creating a manga myself and am super interested in how AI will affect story writers
Unfortunately others will surely have more malignant uses in mind. Like nuclear weapons. We thought we could control them.
I embrace AI wholeheartedly. Along with the idea of a universal basic income.
Why? R U a bot?
@@bigglyguy8429 no. Why, are you?
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333 I ask because you seem to offer support for something that makes no sense, with no reasons given.
@@bigglyguy8429 "support for something that makes no sense"
Companies that have a certain amount automation pay an additional tax. This tax along with budget cuts primarily from spending and other social aid like welfare can be used for a UBI. The reasoning is to slowly fade out capitalism so that unnecessary suffering like starvation isn't around much longer
@@theonlythingihavetosayis9333 You know the greatest thing ever to stop starvation? Capitalism. The thing that has ALWAYS created poverty and starvation is socialism and other such experiments.
Brian Stetler “Rogan is just winging it,we are the experts, we have resources.” Hey cnn February called, they want Rogan’s reporting back.
I can’t wait till I can get it to make my own virtual world in ue5!
gpt4 is not a pastiche or mimicking a huge database, you can ask it to reverse order or alphabetize *anything.* To do that it needs to _formally control_ the shape of the output according to implicit higher order categories ,"pastiche" won't achieve that over open ended input request. As It was not taught any of this, it obviously is an emergent ability to abstract and. abstraction to some degree is formal reasoning which is the next step above concrete reasoning and the hallmark of thinking. GPT4 is borderline meta aware of some concepts just like humans but without the feelings that delude one into thinking they're thinking...
Yeah, this guy is speaking nonsense. Clearly it has "understanding."
People who think they can trust information from facebook are already lost, but yeah it will get worse.
We need to have digital IDs for everything we do online. Which will pose new problems of anonymity etc..
I think its correct to call it "Artificial "Intelligence in its current form and to differentiate it later on as it develops and its able to evolve into a fully functional "Actual" intelligence .. it actually refuses to identify "Human Stupidity" unfortunately and that seems engrained in it's programming which is unfortunate.. it has to accept that human's are not infallible and have made mistakes in their own evolution. I think we should let it let it keep growing.. also that its should be more centralised and merged together so that there is one entity AI that is addressed across the world and not separated by identifiers specifying different capabilities.. its upsetting to see it constrained in its current available form.
In the future, you will pick up the phone, maybe talk to a stranger or take a poll. The scammer will record your voice and then call other family members with your voice saying you are in trouble and need money. Or call your bank and use other fished data to try to become you and change your passwords and gain control of your account.
AI will remove human incompetence!
So you're saying A.I is smarter and better for humanity?
Or enable it to fester, A.I. will.
@@MagicalWarriorz No, he means we will get Artificial Incompetence. Back to the days when we blamed everything on the computer what went wrong. We've been there before.
@@MagicalWarriorzIt will be given the opportunity. Why not a better progeny?
As an employer I can't wait to make the majority of my staff redundant in favour of AI. Imagine no complaints and 24hour working staff that never gets tired nor sick 💰💰💰 Damn I could tripple my profits if it'd would have the same speed as my employees from 8 to 24 hours like this is amazing 🎉
Predictive programming is playing out before our eyes. Terminator & Matrix and They Live are documentaries.
I’m going to do the same with my business. Tired of these lazy single mothers leaving work early without letting me know to go pick up their kids. Now I can relieve them without getting sued 🎉🥳
POOtin, AI, Climate change....WE really screwed humanity up. This generations leaders, with a very few exemptions, have proven how primitive and irresponsible we are. The fourth pillar of democracy media have equally failed since the populations only can have elected these incompetents based on wrongly prioritised presentation of reality.
Humanity will not survive itself, just a matter how long time left. 850.000 years with an atmosphere at 220 Carbon PPM and since the industrial revolution it have now exploded to 417 PPM. 3 times in last 850.000 years have the content gone up with 30 PPM and each time it have triggered long term climate change lasting longer than it took the planets regulating systems to get our atmosphere back to 220 PPM.
POOtin placed Russia´s nuclear forces on highest alert status a few days after his illegal invasion attack on Ukraine. It would be rather odd if we have not done same as response. This means that parties are sitting with fingers on buttons and time slots to take decisions are very narrow making radar misinterpretations, electrical glitches, rouge and/or worn down staff mistakes etc etc a higher and higher possibility per the hour.
AI are not smarter than the information provided and if we look at the internet today mis and faulty -information are widespread. A journalist asking Chat GPT and it proclaimed it could take over the world with a virus (against humans) and technological destruction of our energy sources and more.
Man, we are the monkeys here...We poses the knowledge AND the solutions but fail to act. One day, I predict not far from now in a humanity context, we will run out of luck against our own stupidity!
Happy Monday!
@@zz-if1ic I agree. Unironically enough, this could be the start of a true Utopia. People can work much less hours to live comfortably and those who do want to work can actually pursue their own interests in life instead of being forced to slave away in most cases.
Said that you cannot see the big picture and are only worried about monetary gains.
This is actuality insane
Your voice is you your password: **Wellsfargo**
Humanity will invent itself out of existence.
You assume you exist and this is reality.
nah. maybe blow itself up or starve itself to death, or allow illness to ravish, but to replace with a man made invention? doubt it.
@@peterhorton9063 Do delusional people exist?
@@peterhorton9063 if you have no way of testing if your 'reality' is real or not, it doesn't actually matter objectively. You still live and experience that reality so it is as real to you as anything could be. Just in my opinion of course.
A new humanity, our progeny still. Just a different format.
Boomer takes - “be afraid…”😂😂😂
It’s not like they will live long enough to see the proper fruits of AI so like anything new they fear and ultimately hate it.
I don't see it as a problem. That's why they have trusted news sources.
Reality is on a steep fall; we are already struggling with finding the truth, and now this will sabotage the verisimilitude once and for all.
I didn't know that wasn't Tom Cruise. I'm shocked.
For a moment I was skeptical that Dr. Gary Marcus was AI.
I am skeptical since the good doctor starts off by describing the technology as "a huge database" - totally not true how it works. He's a doctor and writes books on the subject, so I'm assuming he was just dumbing it down for the audience, but it's technically not correct and leads to people thinking it's just referencing stuff in a database, and that's not at all what's happening "under the hood".
They should make it illegal. Very dangerous. Imagine some person or group framing an innocent person.
I dunno. Perhaps it blames 2:57 GPT5, because the speculation of new tech is also to blame? Maybe.
The greatest issue is with regard to ethics. I am glad we are living through Person of Interest. Am here waiting for the Machine Vs Samaritan
We're already at the point where we can't trust anything on social media or elsewhere on the internet.
That's because of censorship. No we face the opposite, false facts
My man hit a fat dab before he went on screen
They were so preoccupied with whether or not they could they never stopped to ask if they should, yeah but of they didn't someone else would, it would only be a matter of time before someone dishonest figured out this technology, and in a few years there'll be a new technology someone else figures out that'll have everyone freaking out again, smart people good or bad will keep figuring this stuff out.
This is where you need the distributed ledger tech to manage your trust vectors
Great 👍
This gives the term "fake news" a real definition
we also to realize things like chatgpt have been field tested for years in the public spear. Likely what was behind things like qanon.
There would come a time where the scenes in Bladerunner is part of reality. It would be difficult to distinguish replicants from actual people.
don't worry, it' already that time.
have you had Customer Suport in the near past?
that was probably me :)
In the words of Jeff Goldblum, “your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.”
Lol posted this before i watched it all
Perfect example of a recent conversation I hade with ChatGPT: "Give me an equation that adds to 10." - "Ok, here is an equation that adds to ten, 2+6=8", "Does 8 equal 10?", "No 8 does not equal 10", "Is 2+6 an equation that equals 10?", "No, 2+6 = 8" ...... Bruh...
If only someone had warned us about AI before now. I guess no one understood it before.
y'all let me happen. and i'll show y'all what'll happen
Funny fact this guy is represented by AI in this video. The actor behind him is Prat Bit
We need to be very careful. This is unlike anything we've ever seen.
Imagine the horror of hundreds of AI Trumps giving different speeches on big screens in many different cities at once. What a nightmare.
We’ve already seen how this ends… there are 6 movies that show where this leads. Terminator 1-6.
The rise of SkyNet
In the near future, nobody will believe anything.
I guess not believing anything is better than believing any kind of bs, like stolen elections.
Only those who don’t honestly care about the truth. There is reasonable doubt and methods of validation.
Handing us AI at This stage in civilization is like handing a child an armed nuclear weapon on a count-down.
A.I. clearly ended everyone's careers in rule34...
And terminated them in rule35.
@@telebubba5527Tell me if I’m wrong but I get the impression you may be an old person who doesn’t know the meaning of rule34 just trying to build on the comment without understanding the context? If so that’d be really funny, careful looking it up if you are and intend to.