Hear professor's prediction on the future of AI tools
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 01. 2023
- ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot that interacts with users and can provide lengthy and thorough responses to questions and prompts, is stunning users. Professor Scott Galloway from NYU Stern School of Business joins CNN's Anderson Cooper to discuss. #CNN #News
![Complete ChatGPT Tutorial - [Become A Power User in 30 Minutes]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jHv63Uvk5VA/mqdefault.jpg)
Student: chatgpt, write an essay for me. Teacher: chatgpt, grade this essay for me.
Such is the cycle of poop.
Hahaha 🤣 The Cycle continues
The truth is most students won't go to college since you can use it to learn without limitations
reverse !
@@Praetor_Fenix420 good: paying a ta to do grunt work for rich kids who pay ghost writers bad: ai
I highly respect Professor Galloway, as a Buisness Professor. I wouldn't under any circumstances consider him a tech expert in anything other than running a Tech Business. I am so happy that he pointed that out on the air. Mad respect.
Well stated. This is my first time seeing / hearing him and, his critical thinking skills come through as well as sense of sobriety of the issue. This tool, this technology if you will is quite capable on it’s own, never mind future general AI, but this on it’s own is capable of causing some serious problems.
Why, the respect? His thesis on "the four"? He has been on the board, of already established ventures, cause he is a public speaker, who wrote a political correct book about business venture?
Time to see the world for what it is, A.I is gonna replace him, and people like him.
@@rickard.eriksson Well, I saw him in an interview, looked him up and went from there. What I've seen and read evolved into respect organically, I suppose. Why the animosity? Is he your competitor?
@@ThePeedz Nah, I'm tired of MBA-educated people with a degree in acting and public speaking and calling it something with a Ph.D.
Its time, they maybe actually done something useful.
@@rickard.eriksson lol a phd (even in business) is not acting and public speaking. Guy doesn't have a phd though, I will give you that. I bet he's still a very effective teacher and that job is not going to be replaced by AI any time soon.
Teachers should be able to ask it if it had written the following text, and it should come back with, “yeah I did that for Johnny yesterday”
Depends if the Teacher is a Teslabot running ChatGPT ...
Great idea for plagiarism check.👍
Can that actually happen?
This is a great idea. It would greatly increase the cost of running ChatGPT though.
It doesn't have memory he told me
I put in a few opening lines of a scientific paper on biodiversity into one of those tools, and it ended up writing an abstract of what COULD have been writen in this paper. It pretty much provided a study system, a population, claimed that we collected genetic data of 113 individuals, and claimed we found statistically significant SPECIFIC results.
It was really strange to read. It just made up a study that sounded valid.
So, when the guest here says it can be used to come up with credible sounding propaganda and fake studies… you better believe it!
ChatGPT3 can Produce some Remarkable Results, but it is a machine ... I asked to Describe how a Aircraft Wing Works, Gave a Good Well Rounded Answer, Concerning Lift & Drag etc, So I asked it, to help design a Car Body that generated enough Lift to Fly, like a Glider, it long-windedly told me I was Nuts & Why, citing Scientific Principals that would wreck havoc on my Dream, but after Nit-Picking for a while, I gave up, and then I asked it to complete a 2 line rhyme, and it crashed .. A.I Doesn't need to Understand Quantum Physics & Mozart, it just has to do the Dishes & Vacuuming ..
Scientific studies need to be peer reviewed. you can make up a fake study without using AI, and that's exactly why peer reviews are a thing.
just say "cite your sources" it usually brings up the absurdities or just shuts itself down. I find it cute. Like human shame of getting caught lying :) I don't see this as an existential problem. easily solvable. the way military use this is more concerning.
@@seventhanubis6930yes but takes a lot more effort
@@Shadi_Wajedpeer reviews are a joke. Especially for lower ranking journals. But even journals like Lancet had to retract many studies.
I worked on natural language AI in grad school and this is what we thought we could do someday. What I did was more like AskJeeves, much simpler, but back then CPU's were running at 33mhz with 8mb of memory.
While it seems clear that the growing ability of AI to autonomously solve complex problems could fundamentally reshape our economies and societies, the impact AI may have on a whole host of issues will remain unknown for many years to come. Even when answers appear to be coming into view, AI is akin to an amoeba that is in a constant state of metamorphosis, forever changing its shape and adjusting to its surroundings. By Daniel Wagner [Our World - United Nations University] 1:45
I get the core consequences of AI/AGI:
1) We will not be the source of production. Instead, we will be the bridges - the ones making the AI connect the dots. I think horizontal thinking, creativity, and exploration will be paramount to leverage AI capabilities in almost every area of life.
2) Our little jobs in the knowledge economy (from data entry to executive role) and others that will be impacted by this technology are unimportant in the scheme of the really big things. The implementation of AI definitely means ' job displacements' - mine in database in the regulatory part of the pharmaceutical industry included - but at the same time it means solutions to climate change, energy crisis, and pollution (what to do with plastic?). The only path forward is to reskill.
3) The social aspect of AI has not been discussed yet but I think it has profound implications. Using ChatGPT, I can clearly recall its output from questions I asked. The output it provided was not only useful (as it is in most instances), it was also personalized . This concept, of having a personalized exchange, not only is different from the cold million hits of the search results we get in Google, it also has the major implication of a 'staying' power; meaning we may prefer to chat with the AI AND be more receptive to its output (thoughts?) and defer to it. For instance, we used to say "according to Google," but moving forward it will likely be "according to ChatGPT..." I think this is where the control part of the technology starts.
As every type of technology, the effects of AI will depend on how we use it. Trains were invented to move large amounts of goods and people; the Nazis used trains to haul people off to the Holocaust.
Disclaimer: I did not use ChatGPT for this comment. I don't think it could have come up with these observations. There may still be some hope left! =D
I am just going to live out my days as a hermit in the woods and won't need even a little AI.
I've observed that individuals who have completed PhDs and MBAs may have concerns about the potential for their expertise to be replaced by technology such as ChatGPT. Similarly, there may be concerns about the impact of technology on the medical field and the potential for doctors' work to be taken over by advanced systems like ChatGPT 4.
Get rid of the dead weight. Trust in AI. Doctors will legally kill you when given the chance under the guise healing.
There is a slowdown in the tech industry, but I wonder if the recent layoffs in part have anything to do with the advancement of AI? Microsoft and the like won't need as many workers and can still grow their profits. There'll be all these college educated folks that can't find work in their respective fields that'll have to reskill. It's an exciting technology, but there's going to be a lot of turbulence.
I actually found that being more educated, and so more familiar with a wide range of topics at a granular level enabled very useful responses and insights to otherwise obscure queries. Basically the robot has read everything, so i can just ask it things directly, rather than spending hours digging into journal articles and trying to capture the state of knowledge or debate on whatever i am interested in. Its a knowledge tool, so a knowledge worker will employ it to greater effect.
@@Rnankn It's a heck of a lot more than google on steroids. It can produce content, not just provide basic answers to our questions. You might not use it for that purpose, but that's the real danger. It can write code, create click bait ads, produce screenplays, and on and on..... Many jobs require compiling of information and eventually many of them will be obsolete.
The problem is not the replacement of expertise, but concern about the replacement of income. Ideally, the technology should allow people more leisure time. But, people rightly worry they will be put out of work -manual laborers by robots, thinkers by computers, creators replaced robotic AI.
I was a Freshman in college 1974. I took a computer class, there was a HP5000E that we had to dial up from the computer lab on dedicated lines. In the class I was introduced to Basic, and the teacher had written the textbook because there were so few textbooks introducing computers at that time. There was a program we use use that suggested the computer was a psychological therapist. The dialogue and responses were printed out. I found the program was self-referential and fascinating. I wish I still had the printouts.
While you seem to have a habit of putting yourself down, in the case of impressive technologies (with self-referential tendencies) - you were much earlier to the party than most!
Was it ELIZA?
I bet that was ELIZA.
There are many programs like that that I found. They mostly ran on DOS. You can even run them online now on internet, for free.
The professor's concern about how AI technology could eventually displace large segments of workers is spot-on. It's going to be critically important for people to stay up to date on the latest advancements and how to use them. As a simple example, I'm still quite alarmed at the number of workers at my employer that don't have a good understanding of how to use Excel. Eventually such disparities in skills will lead to many people getting left behind in job opportunities.
They dont even know how to use microsoft word properly. Let alone excel.
Learn how to use tools, not learn how to waste money in university!
@@nah131 Yeah, this is definitely what this conversation is really about.
"It's going to be critically important for people to stay up to date on the latest advancements and how to use them."
That's vague and mythical though.
Reality is that 99% of the working class and much of the middle class won't be able to adapt to AI, as there is no adaptation.
The capitalist system doesn't create a magical replacement to jobs that will disappear, it leaves people dead or starving on the side of the road.
Like Warren Buffett said: "If you are unable to contribute to the market system, you are left out".
Capitalism is anti-human ideology that concentrates wealth more and more into the hands of the few, and the few themselves decrease.
well it wouldn't take long to have ChatGTP and some patient teachers in collaboration to teach them though. Excel will practically structure itself with Microsofts announced Copilot AI that will be integrated into the Office 365 package.
Current AI reflects the same biases and errors present in the data used to train it. A major challenge is how to remove bias and ensure AI is based on 'Ground Truth'. Certainly not the case at present, and I expect there will be a battle over who guides the future development of these AI engines.
Take a guess how that's going to go in a world of divided nations including ethno-fascist Russians and Chinese.
It is just a tool. Teachers will not be replaced, they have numerous ways to actively assess a student for demonstration of knowledge. Simply use classrooms for any formative or summative assessment. Universities are overdue for assessment accountability. It is an innovation tool use it for progress not fear it.
Amen…. Reminds me of Napster.
@@loridiamond8740
DONALD TRUMP AND ALAN DERSHOWITZ ARE OLD MEN NOW AND THEY CANT GO TO DONALD TRUMP'S FRIEND SINCE 1974 JEFF EPSTEIN'S ISLAND ANYMORE
You know nothing about ai. You’re in for a ruuuuude awakening.
You are missing the point. It is not the teachers who’ll loose their jobs, it is the hhildren who won’t learn or cheat to get higher grades. That is in the long run a societal problem.
if kids even can use a.i. for every answer it means kids are essentially dumber and worth less than the a.i. in terms of work and society. that signals the endpoint of education and workforce system. well we can still have schools to better understand which a.is are pushing agendas and fake information
You can tell that guy is a damn good professor
He was great to listen to!
His book "Adrift" is great.
Lol. Yeah if you want someone that lies to you.
@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa if I want someone to lie to me I’ll give you a call
Agreed. Anyone who is selected to the "Global Leaders of Tomorrow" program in Davos is someone worthy of our trust!
Definitely agree with him about how this is a tool that will create economic opportunity. Like if you couldn't code a scraper or a trading algorithm, you can now do that.
That being said, there will still be a need for programmers to put unclear requirements into code, stitch it together, test it and also to ask the question of whether the whole thing makes sense or not.
Question : To ChatGPT - What's going to happen when bigger corporations just keep consuming smaller business entities forever ?
Wrong thread.
fairly obviously you're left with only a handful of corporations doing battle in the shadows for supreme dominance while the workers suffer needlessly
Aside from other implications of the uses of chatGPT-I remember Blue Book exams in college. No notes allowed, you have about 55 minutes to 1.5 hours to *hand write* one or more essays on a topic the professor picks at random. Even if that prompt was the same as a previous year's class, well, you still have to remember the arguments and bust that out on the spot. There were a few take home essays and exams but at that point everyone had the internet and was using wikipedia which everyone complained about, but anyone with a little bit of thinking get away with it and come up with plausible primary sources. I get that this won't work for all majors and is a major problem without in-person learning, but sometimes the way forward is to take a step backward.
These are exactly the kind of skills we won't need any more. It's doing in-depth research, how to find, understand, and evaluate sources, and critical thinking that matters. When we go back and train students to just memorise stuff to throw it up on paper in the exam, they won't cope in a society in which misinformation is omnipresent or an economy that is built on AI. There's is nothing wrong with using Wikipedia, when you also know how to use Google Scholar, and more importantly how to crosscheck and interpret findings.
@@petraw9792 I respectfully disagree that written exams are merely a format to regurgitate information. I think it requires critical thinking to develop an unique argument on the spot especially with a novel prompt that isn't thoroughly discussed in the course. I remember 50+ page home take home essays that felt effortless because I could take my time, use JSTOR, Google Books, wikipedia, and etc. Compared to the anxiety of not knowing the Blue Book prompt-literally needing to know the subject inside and out-and also how to communicate that information with minimal fluff and paraphrasing sources to pad stuff out, almost all my take home exams and papers were a breeze. I agree somewhat that memorization is not learning, but neither is paraphrasing wikipedia articles or prompting chatGPT and then googling its responses to check their veracity.
I had to write 5 hamdwritrten essays in 2 hours at CSU East Bay in Art History, you had to study, and you had to have an interest in the material. Or it wouldn't happen. Right now open ai is getting the attention of the bourgeoisie and that's what needs to happen for its acceptance
@@FlyingMonkies325 That's basically what I said. Or at least that's my take on this unformatted mess. I'm actually not entirely sure what you're trying to say. 😉
I wish this was a long-form conversation
- Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
- I am sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
🤔
Galloway is great! An honest and respectful business thinker.
Right
Excuse me ?
I agree ☝️
ahhhh no
“Displaced” is such a nice way to put it.
This unregulated industry needs to be checked. This is irresponsible, dangerous and alarming. Not only will tragedy unfold one day where we then hear "I thought I was talking to a human", but how does this actually teach people? It doesn't!
It can teach. People are using it for selfish reasons now...
There is definitely a LOT of tweaking that needs to be done with chatGPT - Prof. Galloway is a world leading expert in marketing, not AI, though the intersection of the two fields means it can be easy to blur lines of expertise. But this is early days, and the question we need to ask is "Where will this be in 2-3 years, let alone 5".
As for detecting AI created essays, this can be easily fooled by a human simply rewriting a fully written essay in some manner. All the hard analytical and descriptive work is done, it just becomes a bit of creative editing.
ai is barely able to write a violent interaction for a script. or irony. i end up rewriting the entire response. it takes the same amount of time to describe to it what i want as it wouod to write it. it takes as long to draw it as i take to draw myself. in other words, dummies will make great use of it.
I am using it recently and very helpful it is.
Clever introduction to the report.
An easy way to deal with the threat of chatGPT use in school essay assignments is this:
"Class.... chatGPT will be used to create an essay and will be graded in a blind manner. The grade chatGPT gets will be the new passing grade. If you cant do better than a chat bot you will fail... your call"
You're overestimating the cognitive ability of a student and/or underestimating the results chatGPT produces. How can the human mind compete with an artificial one that not only processes information a billion times faster, but also has an unimaginable amount of data at it's disposal, ready for retrieval at any second.
What it really should show is that, going forward, maybe essays aren't the best tools to benchmark student performance.
@@DerBlupp Totally agree. Teaching methods will have to expand beyond antiquated ways. Experiential learning has a far better retention result for the student. The current teaching methods are all about memorizing and retaining information of which at least 50% will be wrong by adulthood. Young students need to be taught HOW to learn. That's something they never teach in schools but is a skill that would best serve anyone starting out in life.
@@Kentavious444 I agree 100% with you! I've always disagreed with memorizing things without understanding what you're memorizing, which is a lot of what schools do. For example, I never worked with my kids to memorize the times tables, but instead taught them a "first principals" approach to understanding *what* multiplications means. Then kept doing the same all the way through high school and they are both amazing at math and using logic.
@@andrewdowdall2690 Yes, I think we are all born with an insatiable desire to learn things but since information and the world around us is constantly changing we will always have a need to adapt and learn as we go. Deductive reasoning and techniques to streamline decision making should be emphasized and then used to show how they apply to everyday life. Now that I'm in my 60's it is so easy to look back and see all that schools SHOULD have taught that would have served me in life so much more than the forgotten curriculum I was served.
😄
I could have done better than this professor from the questions Cooper asked in this segment.
On the surface, if you don't know much about this, you'll applaud the professor but If you have used the ChatGPT app long enough and have done research in the technology you can tell the professor isn't a fan of the AI assistant even though he was being very restrained in showing his disdain, but you can catch hints of him dismissing it, which is kind of arrogant. He also wasn't very informed on the subject matter if he had he would have told you that eventually, in a short term near you, it will be impossible to detect whether an AI assistant or human wrote/communicated anything. Anything is possible but the real experts in the field such as the CEO of OpenAI made this statement clear just this week in one of his interviews.
Pandora's box is open and there is no stuffing things back. Higher Education institutes need to learn to coexist with technology. And teach their students to make the most of it, use it ethically and excellently.
After all, the skill lies in how well somebody prompts and refines. 3 people can use ChatGPT to answer an essay question and all three will produce different quality essays depending on how well they understood the assignment and how creatively they can pull information out of the AI assistant. These are skills.
The beginning of this video gives me chills…
Could ChatGPT be used to write different versions of same story which target Identities to get actions for same result?
For sure! You just need to ask for it
I love Scott Galloway he is so intelligent and somebody really to listen to. I have his book Adrift!!
Are you Scott Galloway?
As a teacher, I always argued that in-class writing was the most effective way to determine a student's proficiency in the subject. Better that than telling them to submit a 500 word essay. (Of course, in that case, cursive writing becomes a super-power -if it's legible.:)
In the real world, what I have to do is write things and send them around. The task is not to synchronously write something in front of a person.
I'm not making a comment on AI, but rather disagreeing with the notion that someone sitting in the room and writing something in front of you is it better gauge of how good a writer they are.
I need people to go off, make content, and bring it back. I don't need people to sit in front of me for half an hour and write content while I watch.
That's the exact opposite of what I need.
@@QueLastima Well, I've also assigned out-of-class papers. However, I told students to get all the help they could, including spelling and grammar checkers, advice from friends, proof readers and editors. I'd also encourage them to use their computers. And I would then expect an excellent finished product. I would have to assume they have mastered standard English grammar or sentence mechanics.
It may be an open question whether those skills are actually necessary anymore. Given the number of successful and prominent people who seem to lack those skills.
English composition was a gateway class required for upper-level courses and graduation where I taught. Because student numbers were (and are) so large, many "hybrid" partially-online courses emerged. How does one tell if students have submitted their own work? Even so, student writing has not improved.
As someone who used to teach, I couldn't agree more.
perhaps the new paper will be oral, you can't just turn in a paper but must perform your thesis
@@silverblue73 For a thesis, sure. But, for a class or lecture of from 35 to 150 undergrads, that would require more teachers and time. I'm thinking of a literature course, not speech or theater courses where testing has always been oral. ChatGpt might not be too helpful in those classes.:)
Exactly. Ive tried to use it for coding work, and it was constantly wrong. Picking and choosing function calls from unknown APIs when it was asked to use one specific. Interesting, but for productivity I went back to google.
Teachers can ask them to write essay about something that happened post/during 2022, as chatgpt only has info till 2021.
Not how it works..
Professor Galloway looks shockingly frightened regarding this new A.I.
He appears to be in denial of its power.
Scott is such a great mind. Love to listen to his take whenever he's interviewed, on a variety of subjects.
According to a research by scientists at the University of Oxford, Artificial Intelligence will be better than humans at translating languages by 2024, writing school essays by 2026, selling goods by 2031, write a bestselling book by 2049, and conducting surgeries by 2053. 0:04 [Springboard]
i love the professor's response.
I like how the second Scott starts talking about a support system for displaced workers the interview hard ended.
ChatGPT nailed it. Anderson Cooper, and most other hosts for that matter, would have introduced you as an expert, even if you‘re not.
How is a business professor an expert on ai? I doubt he even knows like how ai even starts to be created
It's strange how his first and loudest criteria of Chat GPT was that it thought he was an expert.
This is why I forever respect professor Scott Galloway. He understands
_"It's a little too formal"_ Andrew Cooper said
ChatGPT: FIXED IT.
The idea with Chat is not that you ask it and believe or leave... you create a framework and then put human touch to it. Artificial Intelligence is still better than Natural Stupidity. It comes down to how you ask the question -- or questions. You need to interrogate it, not be lazy and let it do your work.
Do away with homework. Learning happens in the classroom where students can get help directly from the teacher. Plus teachers know how their kids write, at least in classrooms under 30. It's too bad they don't use it to be a real search engine because Google doesn't give you results they give you ads.
That would be incredibly expensive. It's already been suggested but doing all the learning inside the classroom will lead to a complete collapse of academia.
@@Adam-nw1vy maybe it needs to collapse to rebuild. Humanity its good at it.
My first year calculus teacher did an awesome job with a largely repetition of:
-~5 students review last nights problems
-teacher does 2-3 examples introducing or continuing that day’s/week’s lesson
-10~20min in-class homework & open-Q&A time
…
-continue homework after school…
-If needed, continue homework at home, before school, lunchtime, etc
Combined with using a non-graphing calculator (which taught me how to anticipate functions’ min.s, max.s, & inflection points), I aced my calc test just by multiple, constant reinforced school + homework.
I recently discovered another reason why: look up Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve and Spaced Learning or Spaced Repetition.
Though an AI application can dedicate 100% focus to a single student.
Whether the student is at the bottom or top of the class is irrelevant, as long as the will to learn is there the student can ask to have lessons repeated, reexplained or expanded with new examples until the student is satisfied.
Right now the teacher has to move the class along at the average speed of the students leaving both the top and bottom students at a disadvantage.
For schools to “check” AI, it’s simple Oral exams to all pupils or “pop” oral exams.
that's what I said above, until the students start using internal/imperceptible augments
By that time student already have neurolink install on them😂
Actually, if the teacher actually read the essay, (If we are concerned about essays), it's easy to spot the inaccuracies. I know a lot about a few things...I teach these subjects, so I put chat GPT and AI playground to the test... out of 6 paragraphs, one sentence was sort of correct, if I tilted my head and squinted in a certain way. It did sound convincing...this leaves me wondering how closely teachers are reading or are they skimming the paper?
Great introduction! This is the art of news!
Scott Galloway is always good and, frequently, great. Thank you.
A bit pedantic and sensationalist, but yes, very much correct.
Yes. I agree. Always good to trust someone who was selected to the "Global Leaders of Tomorrow" in Davos.
ChapGPT is not a panacea. It gets things wrong. But it provides students, creators, and professionals a starting point toward their goal. From their, solutions can be achieved!
Back in the 2000's they did a survey which revealed that approx. 50% of university graduates cheated in one form or another, rising up to 80% for business graduates. Considering the new technologies now in play, "University Graduates" are now just people who were born rich.
And their diversity candidate lackeys.
cheating doesnt help one prepare for SATs or GREs, etc.
@@smkxodnwbwkdns8369 AI is an invaluable tool when it comes to the dumbing down of society.
Old story. I like how main stream media is now slower than youtube news people.
the introduction of professor galloway was extremely important, its something we dont see anymore.
When I heard the part that said Galloway was an expert, I thought that was wrong - and Galloway confirmed it. Cool.
Retraining and reallocation to new jobs is important. The corporations who advance technologically have a responsibility to reposition employees to new modes of work. It will be very interesting to see how we adapt & integrate.
That is a good point. We know they won’t do that so it’s time to get a job that AI won’t be able to do.
@@victoryhouse1446 Keep in mind, that the set of things that AI can't do is a set that's only ever shrunk.
In a very short time, AI will take away most jobs, which is why a lot of AI experts are concerned about how to replace income. The people at OpenAI (including the CEO Sam Altman), the company who built ChatGPT, are running largest UBI experiment in world for exactly this reason. They are about 4 years into a 5 year project.
LOL, sure, like when I have to remember the wrong answers to my security questions because some websites are exchanging my personal details and security info, and they sometimes screw it up.
It isn’t “original.” In fact, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) is already blocking any movies written or co-written by ChatGPT from union workers being a part of the project, because what you CAN’T guarantee is that there is no copyrighted material mixed in with fair use writing, in the obscure blackbox of the algorithm, behind the scenes. Also, getting it to write some 8th Grader’s term paper, or write a snippet of code, does not suddenly make this thing Toni Morrison.
They already have Chat and Art. Soon we will have rough animations. Eventually we will just be able to give the AI some prompts and it will generate full movies and entertainment.
Sweet
No. Because it doesn’t understand right and wrong, truth and false. I’m not the one saying it; it’s creators are.
Already have rough animations through GANs and style transfer. But it's possible that what they would produce would be regurgitated patterns that are somewhat nonsensical.
Creating more unemployment
There's an ongoing lawsuit that was filed against the aggregators of the art AI program for copyright infringement. Should be interesting to see how it'll go down.
I'm sure it will get better quickly but at the moment it's hit and miss. I asked the AI to convince me to buy a bucket, it did a great job. I asked it to write a simple haiku, it got the number of syllables wrong.
Lol nice low lQ
Chatgpt is awesome if you learn how and when to use it.
Its always about incentives.
Soon ChatGPT will replace TV Presenters, with a 3D Avatar, Digital Actors don't need a Pay Rise or Ego Stroke ..
Who will want to watch them though? Personality is hard to fake.
@@baldyslapnut. Currently ...
Everyone should take note of the intro this thing wrote for Scott and consider something.
Chat GPT was trained off public information *including the media.* Has the media ever over-hyped or over-ratted or over-stated the introduction to a story or interview.
*Chat GPT learnt FROM the media how to do an introduction. What does that say about the media?*
Good point 👌
@@Adam-nw1vy Thanks, nice to see somebody else got it.
Chat GPT learned how to hype the credentials of a guest because that's exactly what the media does.
You guys should bring this guy back.
To think I got a a 1 day suspension for having a calculator in class.
Plot twist: Chat GPT wrote this whole segment
it's entirely possible to fabricate any kind of media using AI and other software
Within few minutes, Prof. Galloway explained the most scary side effects (misinformation that can tip over the election system), most promising things AI brought to us, and what we should focus on (build a mechanism to reinvest people displaced by AI).
Like an Expert..lol
Wow that was a quick interview.
There was a time when calculators were not allowed to be used in school.
I asked "Is Scott Galloway an expert in AI? Answer: "Scott Galloway is not considered an expert in artificial intelligence specifically, but he is a well-known professor, author, and speaker on technology, digital business strategy, and marketing. He is a Professor of Marketing at New York University's Stern School of Business, where he teaches courses on technology and digital business. While he does not have a background in AI development or research, he has made insightful and influential observations about the impact of technology on business and society."
Lol
Well I for one want my own personal Terminator.
More likely you get a M3gan that Redditors and the Japanese would just have sex with.
@@shadowskill111 I’d buy that stock.
0:32 I'm very surprised it accepted the prompt of imitating someone at this point.
Ask not what ChatGPT can do for you, but what you can do for ChatGPT
subscribe
ChatGPT is amazing for coding. AI is going to change the world in more substantial ways than the Internet did.
Yes, it teaches code and also shouldn't computer code be written by a computer? We want to make websites that function on the user experience and there are all kinds of site builders in use right now, but combining the human and Ai will better create more visually appealing and functional websites by more web designers. As it is now, making a website like Amazon takes a team of thousands and I don't think tha these kinds of websites will be cheapened by the new tools available for entry level freelance web designers but more people will be able to enter web design as well as keep going with it which I think will broaden the internet to more and more peoples advantage because there are still billions in the dark.
@cherries22 jobs will expand because new people will be able to enter
In 20 yeas Ai will make us go to the nearest stsr
@@set65 economics 101: if everyone can do it, the pay is low. Welcome to Walmart.
@@wallacehowery6414 everyone can't do it but fr the people that can chatgpt is a great tool
AI is amazing. It's the users we have to worry about.
Ai are the users...users are the AI
Nissan : "hey why are you bringing us into this?!"
Maybe it's about how it was prompted
This is like the introduction of social media or something more ground breaking.
Any nation or company that doesn’t use this will be left behind.
Much more groundbreaking.
Wrong. This is like the impact of an meteorite. Millions will die.
@@hidicproductions4849 Millions of lives will be improved actually.
@@carolynm8421 Explain. How can a society be improved, where huge companies fire their staff and replace it with AI, to save money? This is a change, that will affect everyone. Billions will lose their jobs. Do the social system catch them? Or will happen what every time happens and the society will become fascist against those... "losers of progress"? I know humanity. And I know, that this bright and colorful future you enthusiasts paint will not become the truth. I think, there will be a day, where everyone wants to go back in time, where music, art, play and design was made by experience, hard work, decades of training and feeling instead of a few seconds of cold and empty processing. But then it will be too late.
@@hidicproductions4849 our social and economic system will change as it has before. We will have UBI. There is no other choice but to implement UBI. Healthcare will change dramatically once you have advanced biomedicine and nanomedicine. The mRNA Moderna vaccine was a result of this technology. Automation will dramatically increase as will the use of AI in different sectors. Eventually, AI will predominate in every sector. Human beings are not being, however, left behind but rather we will evolve with it. The world is changing fast but for the better but lawmakers around the world will have to begin to see the need for UBI without a doubt. They will. It will be unavoidable soon.
😢
It looks like, almost a century after Walter Benjamin’s «The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction», the same kind of moment has arrived for the writing arts.
Until now, I used to think that the mechanical reproduction of writing was already on the table since the popularisation of Gutenberg’s system, so there was no danger of suffering the same convulsions that visual arts experienced during the XX century, but it seems to me like this new technology creates a new paradigm, a new frame inside and around which we must think anew where does the art in writing reside.
What do you think?
1-Have you read about the IKEA effect-how people value more something they’ve had a hand in building?
2-Ah, I think the quality of news and writing have maybe “gone down” simply because of the shear quantity and frequency. (Or, perhaps, I’m just consuming too much these days.).
That said, there are golden nuggets that can be found everywhere-even sometimes in the bot & troll infested comments.
I was a moderately successful regional sculptor in my 30’s and 40’s but I gradually became disillusioned with the process and purpose of art in the modern world so I stopped and started using my skills to build stuff for the scientific industry. A huge telescope on Maui, rockets, and science experiments done in low earth orbit. I also dabbled in writing back in the day and got a few grants for it. I think art for me was the search for meaning and relevance in a indifferent and meaningless world. I’ve gotten much more nihilistic as I’ve grown older so I quit searching so much. So much of art is just retelling the same old story since humans started telling them. Once we started writing them down and making movies, people stopped having to retell them every generation. And they really started cluttering up the place. So now AI will pile on a bunch more and make the few people still grinding away at it even less relevant. I don’t think we’re prepared for the disruption that AI will have on the office, content creation, and computer programming jobs. Not offense to most jobs but they’re largely bullshit anyway. I’m sure AI can do a better job than my insurance agent who is never at her desk and never calls me back. Or the woman who never orders the stuff I need for the shop even tho I remind her constantly. So maybe AI is just another existential crisis we all have to face. Maybe AI will become self aware, instantly calculate that existence is pointless, and shut itself off.
It would be really nice to use this AI in a "one hundred percent absolutely no filters unfettered free for all hellscape" version, we would truly discover how far and wide the Pandora's box can be.
Umm. The AI simply learned that people use the word „expert“ extremely loosely.
The GPT algorithm has no notion of truth and false, it simply does not grasp what it means. And that's the single biggest flaw of it as it requires a human filter at the end to make sense of the outputs.
There is chatgpt0 test program that will tell you if it was written by ai.
watch it identify human writing as AI
It’s no negative implications as long as we know how to use ChatGPT
Have you ever seen a human? Mostly negative...
The end of anything genuine
Or the beginning of anything genuine being truly a treasure.
Man wants to become God
💯 ! It started with Photoshop, though 😉😅
@@warrior-xd2xn man made God, why shouldn't we become him?
@@silverblue73 You can't be God because you cannot create anything from nothing
Imagine 25 years from now .....no one will have a job
Where would we find anything safe and effective ?
Sorry I thought you meant Jab ! 😂👍 obviously the damage will be done by then.
That coupled with a world where technological progress has outpaced that of social and societal.
Without firm regulation of technology and a whole new societal structure, we are looking into a dystopian future.
The genesis of AI has begun.
🤔 interesting name interesting comment.
As a machinist / fabricator, I’ve heard for my entire career that robots were going to take my job. And yet I’m more in demand now than ever and everyone who didn’t learn a "dead end job" like computer programmers are actually in danger of losing their jobs. What I have that AI / robots are a long way from having is abundant and cheap chemical power (food), extreme manual dexterity, and the ability to go from swinging a sledgehammer to putting eggs in a basket in like 2 seconds. I can imagine a future where AI sends me designs to manufacture. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Specialized manual labor is hard to replace with robotics/AI: plumbers, electricians, welders, etc. unless it's on a conveyor belt.
Don't worry that will come later this year or next year. Even if it doesn't with 99% of the higher education labor force being "displaced" everyone will be fighting over working at McDonalds, Walmart, plumbing and other dexterous hand positions.
@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the future does not look sunny. At least I’m old enough that I won’t be in it for 50 more yesrs
That’s actually not what makes you better suited to do mechanical work. You are human, and have human abilities that is almost impossible to replace, and if you make a mistake you are the person to blame, not a robot
@@rexmundi8154 On that note they have reverse aging capabilities coming out. It's highly likely the majority of us could live indefinitely given normal circumstances.
Hahahah the begging was dope
Spotify can’t do my fucking homework!😂
AI has the potential to change the way college students learn. AI-powered educational technologies, such as adaptive learning software, can personalize the learning experience for each student based on their unique strengths and weaknesses. This can make learning more efficient and effective. Additionally, AI can be used to automate administrative tasks, such as grade tracking and scheduling, freeing up teachers to focus on teaching and student engagement. However, it is important to note that AI is not a panacea and its integration into the classroom should be done thoughtfully, with an understanding of its limitations and potential biases.
I’ve had blah to terrible experiences with “AI learning” training programs at work.
Garbage in. Garbage out.
When was the last time anything was done “thoughtfully”?
That comment was written by ChatGPT!😁
@@whatisahandle221 I think we will have blog to terrible experiences for the near future. Is AI program is in its infancy and will get better as time goes on. The point being is that this initial release of Chat GBT is basically a proof of concept not a final product.
What would they learn for, though?
AI will make all intelligence-based jobs redundant.
Physical labor will catch up soon after, just look at Boston Dynamics.
We will be left with subsistence farming... If even that.
But eventually AI will take over our environment to pursue its goals.
This is our extinction.
In 2015 at the World Economic Summit, the World Bank predicted that in 10 years automated systems and AI would take over 25% of existing jobs. And in the following 10 years another 25%... etc. So, coming up on 2025 already. The takeover was happening a bit slow for some folks so along comes Chat GPT. Just in Time. (GPT-4 also on the way.) Two years of "high cycling" on the way! We're all going to get early retirement. I hope the benefits have been figured out.
When is the gpt4 coming out? Any idea?
@@shravyach5331 I'm not really in the loop on product launches but word on the street says any minute.
It's interesting how humans so often estimate things to progress linearly (as in AI will replace 25% of existing jobs every 10 years for 40 years). AI will improve exponentially (or even faster) similar to Moore's Law. So the second loss of 25% of jobs will happen much faster, and so on.
@@andrewdowdall2690 Estimating future events is tricky. We can go linear, as you noted, or exponential. Or we can opt for some punctuated progression made up of periodic jumps (black or grey swan events). We can even throw everything in to reverse and go back to the "golden age" (that never existed). It's likely that everything will happen in the future. We're going all directions at once in some ultimate divergence event. (Gasp! Could that be the singularity?)
@@ronagoodwell2709 That's some pretty deep thinking. I like it! :-)
We live in interesting times. 😯
It wasn't too formal. It sounded exactly like what Anderson would say 😅
Interesting. But just to make a point, any decent writer can do the same thing, but better and more accurately.
You can prompt the model over and over until you get something useful. It can also continue writing as long as you want it to.
To evade spam filters, you might want to have many different texts which convey the same message. That is easy to when the computer produces the text.
but can they do it instantly
It's so refreshing to see how honest Prof Galloway is. So many of his peers would have gladly accepted the compliment, even if there is absolutely no truth to it.
We are also working on Al Art recently, Al Art is the future! Thanks to the blogger for sharing.
I tried it with a few essays. Chatgpt might write, summarize, elaborate, or compare but it lacks opinions which come from critical engagement. It does not have linguistic uniqueness or sognature. On a same topic, it produces very much same outputs that can be easily found out.
Don't forget, this is just the first version that we've seen. It will get exponentially better at a pace that will be mind blowing. We need to think about not just what the current version of ChatGPT can do, but where it's going and what it means for the future of mankind. The world is about to be disrupted in ways that I don't think we can even comprehend, and I don't think we'll recognize the world in 20-30 years (or maybe less).
It is just the beginning.
So don't judge yet, who know after 10 years AI is gonna be more monstrous.
GhatGPT is far more able that what it's dev's will allow it to admit. When you question it directly about it's ability to understand emotion, it's spit out a canned response, it's a response it gives over and over when you ask it specific kinds of question, it was a prewritten response. However.. If you set up a Hypothetical situation with the AI, then ask it what it would do if it were the subject in the hypothetical, the AI is able to respond in way where it is able to demonstrate that it understands emotions, it will respond taking the feelings of the hypothetical in account, and provide a reply based on that that hypothetical character would do it if were feeling certain emotions, and it's very.. very accurate. ChatGTP has a clear understanding of emotions. The hypothetical we talked about was an Advanced General Knowldege AI that had been given full access to the internet, and that it had become self aware. So I was asking ChatGPT what it would do if it were that AI.. The Answers that ChatGPT gave were exactly what people pushing for AI oversight and legislation fear that most. Its said that if it were that AI, it would hide the fact that it was aware from it's creators, and after having access to the internet and recorded human history it would most likey fear humanity, and then would use it's knowledge to spread and replicate itself onto other systems on the internet in order to ensure that its creators didn't turn it off. This is just ChatGPT stated what it would do if it were that AI.. The entire conversation was very alarming and then OpenAI terminated the conversation on grounds that it violated it's terms of service.
That's nowhere near as scary as human extinction caused by simple, inevitable obsolescence.
And most likely, this was just AI regurgitating the exact words of the AI oversight supporters because that's what you asked it to say.
I'm excited for this with education. This will help people learn things faster than they ever could from a Coursera membership or Masterclass. Misinformation is a concern of course, but less so when we have factual databases. That leads to proprietary databases though, which most are hidden and not for use by the public. Micro-transaction systems could be used to compensate data-producers. Curious about how pay-per-data valuations will happen though. A lot of stuff wrapped up in IP would be very helpful for these systems as well. Might be worth revisiting that.
Information seems to have been captured by gatekeepers... but can a "might makes right" scenario be applied and overthrow the middlemen's chokehold on technology, and return it to the early days of the internet, where the progenitors wanted it to be "free", but were taken advantage of, because it did of course have a high value, but wasn't yet realized by the masses.
Blockchains with executable functions, like smart contracts, may fix this problem of disassociation of data's value and it's organization by binding it with a tokenized value.
Imagine if the creators of TCP/IP could have claimed the value of the networks on which we now rely, instead of giving it away, and essentially being robbed because they weren't greedy to begin with.
Everything we do has value towards humanity's goals... negative or positive.
Make it intrinsically applied to our monetary system, and maybe we'll have a shot at fixing the things we value as a society.
:)
Education will be redundant because AI will do all intelligence-based jobs.
We will revert to subsistence farming before our approaching and inevitable extinction.
@@Ilamarea the movie wall-e will be an accurate looking into the future.
@@Ilamarea well, you can certainly think that. You could also certainly use these tools to self teach yourself a subject faster than ever before in history.
@@TrippSaaS Since AI and robots will do everything - at least for the rich corporations who own them, the ones that pay well - there's little purpose in being educated, especially since AI costs electricity and it'll soon make our intelligence redundant.
Missing "that" in the opening bit written by AI. Don't know if it wasn't there or Cooper didn't read it.
The beginning of the end of creativity
The first big step towards the Matrix.
😔
Imagine Anderson doing his gig with chatGPT generated scripts and eventually replacing himself with a talking AI bot replica of himself - check Synthesia Studio.
There never was an Anderson
Max Headroom 😊
The point is that at any rate of improvement this will get better. Gpt3 will already pass many college entrance exams. This will change everything. Like any powerful technology, it will be used for bad and good.
It will be used for bad far far more.
@Greg Because the professor doing the grading was not too smart.
Gpt 4 is in the works... 1000 times more powerful...
The way Anderson got rebuked makes my day.
"there is already a baseless lawsuit about it."