actually it matters a lot, especially with intense games, or when manufacturers push a high refresh rate on a panel that can't handle it causing piss poor response times. A monitor with bad response times looks like a smeary mess, you should definitely look at pixel response times, and not what the manufacturer says because what they say is always bs.
@@7_Eko ah [REDACTED] don't hate me because I'm beautiful [REDACTED], maybe if you got rid of that yee-yee-ass haircut you got, you would get some [REDACTED] on your [REDACTED].
+The Hoax Hotel 1ms displays like my Asus VG248QE 144hz (the one they showed in the video) it's like a CRT. My issue with CRT is the terrible scan line that has to travel top to bottom, where as LCD displays the entire picture at once, MUCH better.
***** panels like mine have under 1ms response which put them at CRT level. IPS has better color gamut than CRT too. CRT lovers have actually bought these as their first non-CRT display. Also IPS is better and they're getting closer to 1ms. Panels like the Acer Predator X34 is 4ms, IPS, gsync, 1440 Ultra Wide, 100hz and Asus amazing PG279Q with 1440p, 165hz, Gsync, IPS, 4ms. It won't belong before we have IPS 1ms, they've come a long way quickly. There really isn't a reason to use a CRT anymore.
Suggestion: Full delay/lag explanation from end to end physical (keypress throw vs hair trigger buttons) electrical processing in controller software interpreting that Game software reacting to that change Game engine rendering that change Game engine buffering for post processing Transmitting to display bitrate Display buffering/electrical signal delay (input lag) Display phsyical change (response time) Even potentially as far as 'physiological delay' with older people scoring worse.
Having your video card at "1 Pre-Rendered frame" is huge and imo the biggest thing that reduces input lag after 500-1000hz mouse and such (beside monitor response time).
I have a 1 ms response time monitor. Recently I checked my options and noticed that the response time is set to "faster" ("standard" and "fastest" are available to be chosen), I set it to "fastest" and I started seeing previous frames in inverted colors (black -> white, white -> black and so on). Contrast moving objects started to leave a trail with inverted colors. That's weird.
That's called overshoot, it happens when the brightness of a pixel going from a dark tone to a bright tone (and vice versa) exceeds the target value, leaving a bright/darker trail behind. Manufacturers want to claim their monitors have a 1ms response time, so they add a very agressive overdrive mode that achieves quick response times at the cost of overshoot. Most of the time, you are better off with choosing medium or low overdrive, those settings will improve response time compared to no overdrive but keep overshoot in check
@@maaax1173 Actually, that was an insane timing. I switched to 1 ms delay recently to play CS GO and I noticed that moving objects on my screen started to look strange (I forgot about overshooting on my monitor because I have been sitting on 3 ms delay for 3 years so I didn't realize at first). And a day later you posted the comment, lol
The reason competitive gamers consider more than 2ms unplayable is because of input lag. The less time between an input and the action being displayed on screen, the more control you have. In an extreme example, I recall a documentary about Russia sending a space probe to mars. It was controlled from Earth, with a 5 *second* delay (there and back). The pilots had to undergo training to be able to control it properly, because of the input lag.
This is precisely why I chose the lg 29um67 as my current monitor. It offers the best balance of color reproduction, refresh rate, response time and input delay. It's also ips, supports free sync and who doesn't love an ultrawide.
"The faster the response time of a display is, the quicker it can display an image. The quicker it does that, the quicker you can react to it." That's the tie you could've made between response and input delay.
I've noticed that screens with slower response times cause dark colors and blacks to smear during motion. High FPS gaming ends up with a permanent motion blur effect going on. Especially on games with a lot of darkened environments and high contrast between the background and foreground props.
Wut if your monitor has an overdrive mode then don’t set it at the highest setting. Go down one setting. The response time will get worse but you’ll get less ghosting.
Will I see a big difference between a 75Hz with 5ms monitor compared to a 60Hz 1ms monitor? I know 75Hz makes it smoother, but will there be a big difference between the response time? Thank you!
True response time is btw response time or black to white response time i.e. 1/framerate (in seconds). Meaning the time taken for a completely dimmed pixel (black) to glow completely white (full rgb).
I've found that most people in stores like Best Buy or Staples that are supposed to able to tell you things like these don't even know the difference between refresh rate and response time. When I was looking for a new monitor I asked the guy at buy for the refresh rate and was told it was 1ms, the other thing I found is that people there will just tell you it's best when they have no clue. For instance I was told that a $199 monitor at Staple had a 144hz refresh rate and after a two second Google search I found it was as I figured 60hz. Just do your homework online and order from Amazon or some other online store.
at first this video seems a pretty comercial one with that short duration to explain this bit complex topic, but actually you optimized well that time and its been some very useful information links to check. Thumbs up
I have two monitors. One with 100% accurate rgb colors and 7 ms response time and the other was noticabley less color accurate with 1 ms response time. I prefer all my games to be played on the more accurate colored monitor including the competitive ones. The white washed colors of the other monitor just throws me off
I tend to not care how beautiful an image looks. I'm the kind of person who will turn down the settings on a game way WAY down (sometimes even to minimum) if it means getting a consistently high frame rate. The only exception being resolution which I MUCH prefer keeping at native. That is the last thing I will turn down. Higher input lag and response times though, they turn me off. I notice it too much and it throws me off.
i have an 1080p 60hz 24" 8ms ips monitor... its been my first time playing games above 30fps i cant notice shait but im happy leaving my laptop behind xD
Victor Escamilla i recently upgraded to a 1080p monitor with a 1ms response time it is visably better in fast pace games like titanfall compared to my tv that has a 10ms response time. there not how ever much differance when watching a movie or in semi slow pace games like fallout.
I think some of it has to do with compression while streaming. For some reason Mandalorian on Disney + really doesn't like my B7 oled. It's not always that show either, and it seems to occur most often during dark, particle filled scenes. or how they do the post for that show.
So, I'm looking at a monitor. Specifically the Dell S2316M monitor. It's got great reviews, it's only $99, and it's a 1080p, 60Hz, IPS panel. But it has a 6ms resp. time. My main focus with this build is gaming. CS, Battlefield, and most AAA titles. Is the 6ms a deal breaker?
***** That's the first thing I tried. But even TN, or God forbid VA panels, with a 144Hz refresh rate. were just about double the price. With the cheapest being an IPS 120Hz monitor with a 5Ms resp. time, for $194.99
pay attention to repose time just as much as refresh rate. i messed up and bought something with trash response time and its horrible. because of the trail behind moving stuff i cant see any detail when moving around. i even overclocked by monitor to 120hz and it doesn't help at all
mine is BAAAAAAD. like mine is the epidemy of shit response time. im not saying that all displays are going to be like mine, im just saying careful what u buy
lol monitor spec sheets are a joke, don't believe anything they say (besides like, the type of connections it offers, but even the power consumption is usually a lie) For example the most BASIC information on any monitor spec sheet will say 16.7 million colours. Bullshit. Liquid crystal displays don't even come CLOSE to displaying 16.7 million colours, not even half, and most monitors(TN I'm looking at you) not even a quarter of that. But the biggest lie on all those spec sheets is usually the contrast ratio. It'll say something like 1 000 000:1 or some bullshit like that. Goodluck, that's dynamic, meaning it adjusts contrast on the fly which means you might get darker darks, but it adjusts the contrast for EVERYTHING on screen, so when you get darker darks you'll get darker EVERYTHING. At best they are usually about 800:1 for a good monitor, about 300:1 for a crappy generic came-with-my-prebuilt one. In a bit of technological irony, our old "obsolete" CRT monitors and TVs did response times, colours, and contrasts order of magnitudes better than modern screens. They just were huge and used a lot of power and also burned out your eyeballs.
+Phantom Reality Picture quality and refresh rate/response times are all important for competitive gamers, it's just that refresh rate and response time are usually more important. I'd be really interested to try one of the new 144 hz ips panels to see if the slightly higher response times are worth it for the much better picture quality, though. Also, calibrating a tn panel will only do so much since they literally cannot display as many colors as IPS panels.
Hussin Al 1ms is the best for gaming,5ms and 6ms is decent,but if you have a monitor that is 8ms or above 10ms it is not bad but is not great and if you a monitor that is above 20ms then than means that you have a very sh***y monitor.
your focus should be 60% hz and 4-% response time. anything 5ms below and 75hz is going to be decent for competitive gaming, but you want 144hz, and 244hz is not needed but if you want to go that route, sure. rediculous saturation, 244hz, and 1ms response time would be the best monitor for competition as you can see people more clearly, and faster.
Can you make a tech tips video on Clock Cycles / Why mixing ram frequencies results in throttling the greater ram to the speed of the lesser. Something along those lines, I think it'd interesting
Is there a huge difference between 1 ms response time and 6 ms response time? And are there HUGE difference between 60Hz and 144Hz? Can I game on a 60Hz monitor with 6 ms?
I have a 5ms LG 60Hz display. I can confirm, that gaming on a 60hz display, is acceptable, but not preferable. I'm looking into upgrading. There even is a big difference between 60 and 75Hz, the biggest the Hz, the less difference. But yes, there is a HUGE difference between 60 and 144Hz. As long as it is under 10ms, you shouldn't see any ghosting, i am not sure though. I hate the fact that you had to wait 3 years to get a decent reply 😳
Yo I appreciate the reply LOL, I got a new monitor. 165hz with 0.5 ms response time and it’s honestly very good. 60hz is still playable but I just dislike it on PC. I feel like I concentrate on the refresh rate more than the game itself. I have a setup video on my channel btw, you don’t need to watch it but I have the monitor in there 😳🤘
so basically a 4ms ips panel is the best "high end" bang for the buck. I just found some good deals for a 4k and a 2k monitor, So I just bought 5k retail worth of monitors for about 1k. not all that much has changed in the last 5 years except for prices and the features of the flagship models
For the first time, i'll actually back an as. Lynda.com is the shit. Super helpful, super informative and makes you actually want to learn. If you're anywhere from 18-25 and looking for college level skills, its a great site.
the lower left of the video was off sync with the rest of the video for me and it is about monitor response time so was that done on purpose or a accident?
Hey guys, I want a 2k monitor but frames are kinda the most important thing to me....y'know, outside response time (And even then, as long as it's relatively fast, I'm fine, I don't need something for a twitch reaction game like CS:GO, just something that displays a lot of frames at a high resolution and doesn't look ghosty.)
I'm still using the Samsung SyncMaster T220 that I got about 8 years ago. It's has it's 2ms response time stamped right on the front. It's served me well even though it's 16:10.
+homeycdawg I still have a SyncMaster P2070 from 2009 which I am using now and it also has a 2ms response time and has worked quite well for games even though its only 1600x900 resolution max. I have pushed it to 1920x1080 using Nvidia control panel and it works, although its not the same as it actually being a full HD monitor and I do get a warning appear saying "not optimum mode" every so often. I still use it for games, but I did recently order a Dell Ultrasharp UP2516D 25 inch 2560 x 1440 IPS monitor for photo/video editing as it has 100% Adobe RGB, 100% sRGB, 100% REC 709, 98% DCI-P3 and I need the color accuracy over very fast response times. It supposedly has either a 5ms or 6ms response time, so may also be good for gaming, but that isn't why I bought it but I will try it for that when I get it and see how well it looks on some games. but still may use the Syncmaster for games.
0:48 rip eyes
Why man i`ve already killed me eyes why again ;`(
hahahahaha
RIP Luke
@@solofosho rip this convo
same
Is a huge grain of salt, still a grain?
+Anid Monsur Yes.
'Tis a brick
Yes, but doesn't mean it has to be huge as in a car or heck even an apple, but it's all relative.
+wooooowwe1 YOU'RE relative
yes
1/3 of video is an ad ..¤_¤
+Basement Dweller you did. from 3:32 to the end is an ad for lynda.com. sucks really bad. from a 5:21 vid is 1:89 an ad.
Ya. Is too much
+Janis Berzins thanks obama
+Janis Berzins I'm sure you'd like to finance this video yourself then?
ncix already makes a shit ton of money...
#LukeTechTips
+Basement Dweller #FatNerdTechtips
#Lukequickie
LukeTechTips > LinusTechTips these days IMO
+Yosyp #LinusLukeQuickie
So true
Maybe this will help people stop obsessing over this.
Oh it's you. You have a bigger channel now.
Interesting response
@@ghog4792 Good timing
actually it matters a lot, especially with intense games, or when manufacturers push a high refresh rate on a panel that can't handle it causing piss poor response times. A monitor with bad response times looks like a smeary mess, you should definitely look at pixel response times, and not what the manufacturer says because what they say is always bs.
1:58 out of all the pictures you could choose for a "gamer" you pick this man?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
thats what majority of gamers look like tho
@@7_Eko sure
@@7_Eko ah [REDACTED] don't hate me because I'm beautiful [REDACTED], maybe if you got rid of that yee-yee-ass haircut you got, you would get some [REDACTED] on your [REDACTED].
@@7_Eko what did I just read?
Does this mean I can watch a faster version of 50 shades of Grey?
haha
@@tigersharkgaming8597 😛
🤣🤣🤣🤣
the editing to make that guy look sad at 2:40 just makes it look like hes having a stroke
Let's make CRTs great again.
+The Hoax Hotel :D green ham gaming
+zemeon2 ctr great for cs ..
+The Hoax Hotel 1ms displays like my Asus VG248QE 144hz (the one they showed in the video) it's like a CRT. My issue with CRT is the terrible scan line that has to travel top to bottom, where as LCD displays the entire picture at once, MUCH better.
***** why? lcds are superior in image reproduction, they dont suffer from scan lines, and can reach higher resolutions.
***** panels like mine have under 1ms response which put them at CRT level. IPS has better color gamut than CRT too. CRT lovers have actually bought these as their first non-CRT display. Also IPS is better and they're getting closer to 1ms. Panels like the Acer Predator X34 is 4ms, IPS, gsync, 1440 Ultra Wide, 100hz and Asus amazing PG279Q with 1440p, 165hz, Gsync, IPS, 4ms.
It won't belong before we have IPS 1ms, they've come a long way quickly. There really isn't a reason to use a CRT anymore.
Suggestion: Full delay/lag explanation from end to end
physical (keypress throw vs hair trigger buttons)
electrical processing in controller
software interpreting that
Game software reacting to that change
Game engine rendering that change
Game engine buffering for post processing
Transmitting to display bitrate
Display buffering/electrical signal delay (input lag)
Display phsyical change (response time)
Even potentially as far as 'physiological delay' with older people scoring worse.
"Different shades of grey will show how intense"
I was expecting something else.
Pika pika!
Having your video card at "1 Pre-Rendered frame" is huge and imo the biggest thing that reduces input lag after 500-1000hz mouse and such (beside monitor response time).
just to clarify this again for the thousandth time. Response time is not the same as input delay.
I have a 1 ms response time monitor. Recently I checked my options and noticed that the response time is set to "faster" ("standard" and "fastest" are available to be chosen), I set it to "fastest" and I started seeing previous frames in inverted colors (black -> white, white -> black and so on). Contrast moving objects started to leave a trail with inverted colors. That's weird.
That's called overshoot, it happens when the brightness of a pixel going from a dark tone to a bright tone (and vice versa) exceeds the target value, leaving a bright/darker trail behind.
Manufacturers want to claim their monitors have a 1ms response time, so they add a very agressive overdrive mode that achieves quick response times at the cost of overshoot.
Most of the time, you are better off with choosing medium or low overdrive, those settings will improve response time compared to no overdrive but keep overshoot in check
@@maaax1173 Thank you for the explanation.
@@JackFastGame Not a problem, didn‘t think you‘d reply so fast though after 3 years lol.
Have a good day
@@maaax1173 Actually, that was an insane timing. I switched to 1 ms delay recently to play CS GO and I noticed that moving objects on my screen started to look strange (I forgot about overshooting on my monitor because I have been sitting on 3 ms delay for 3 years so I didn't realize at first). And a day later you posted the comment, lol
The reason competitive gamers consider more than 2ms unplayable is because of input lag. The less time between an input and the action being displayed on screen, the more control you have. In an extreme example, I recall a documentary about Russia sending a space probe to mars. It was controlled from Earth, with a 5 *second* delay (there and back). The pilots had to undergo training to be able to control it properly, because of the input lag.
Yes competitive gamers swear by 1ms screens... also sponsored by BenQ.
SHADES
OF
GREY
"my play room .. like xbox and stuff"
+strilight perhaps....50?
Leave ops comment on 50 likes
Big black penis
This is precisely why I chose the lg 29um67 as my current monitor. It offers the best balance of color reproduction, refresh rate, response time and input delay. It's also ips, supports free sync and who doesn't love an ultrawide.
_this comment is sponsored by LG™_
I miss plasma screens and their .0001 ms response time. Watching sports on that is amazing.
nobody watches sport
@@reniervandermerwe
>doesn't watch sports
>therefore nobody does
0:46 i almost died
"The faster the response time of a display is, the quicker it can display an image. The quicker it does that, the quicker you can react to it." That's the tie you could've made between response and input delay.
I used to play on 60hz 8ms and still had crazy reaction time on csgo and mw. I cant wait to switch to 144hz and 1ms
Did you saw difrence?
@@ChrisEzio yeah. Huge difference man. It’s sooo responsive and smooth
@@ScxrdFN any difference in delay? im planning to buy 1 too but it has 7ms delau
@@enjay9537 1ms is the best man. It’s unlocks so much potential
@@ScxrdFN no budget for that
I've noticed that screens with slower response times cause dark colors and blacks to smear during motion. High FPS gaming ends up with a permanent motion blur effect going on. Especially on games with a lot of darkened environments and high contrast between the background and foreground props.
In my opinion anything below 5 is good for gaming
Yea, I am at 2 ms and it's amazing.
@@salttomaten5468 im at 1 but when im playing a game it says im at 7 im confused
Thinking about 32’ 144hz 2k 4ms should be ok right?
@@salttomaten5468 same I'm at 2
@@pumpkin8680 that's probably your internets ms time.
Haven't seen Big Linus in a while. Hi Big Linus :)
The only thing that I can notice is that you constantly reach down to that thing on your belt.
+567legodude what, you mean my belt buckle? Thats kind of weird that you know that.
+Azivegu It's in the video, it's visible to everyone, not just me.
If you didn't figure it out yet, its to page on the teleprompter so he can keep reading the script.
I already don’t wanna leave my room
update from future:now we have ips 240hz 1Ms.
360hz is coming my friend
I get artifacts from my monitor when I keep it 240hz
But in 60 I don’t
What is wrong pls help
My monitor is 1ms
this video needs an update eh luke? lol
2 years in the future. Gaming at 4k 165hz, overclock to 240hz.
Wut if your monitor has an overdrive mode then don’t set it at the highest setting. Go down one setting. The response time will get worse but you’ll get less ghosting.
So how many shades of grey are there?
50
+JayPG 69
+JayPG More than any monitor will display.
+JayPG Oh snap
+JayPG Between 420 and 360
LOL that editing at 2:37 !! Hilarious xD
"Different Shades of Grey" -Luke 2016 Kappa :D
Bruuhh🤣
I use my 1 ms 1080p monitor for 5 years. And I am still happy with it.
Will I see a big difference between a 75Hz with 5ms monitor compared to a 60Hz 1ms monitor? I know 75Hz makes it smoother, but will there be a big difference between the response time? Thank you!
ik this is a really late reply lmao, but if i where u back then, i'd keep the 75hz but i'd just save up to a 144hz, their not that expensive anymore
@@robineriksenustad5440 ive found a cheap 1080p 144hz but it is 7ms drlay is it worth to buy does that dont have ghosting?
@@enjay9537 i wouldnt, 5ms or lower
Hey Techquickie what is the difference between true response time and gray to gray response time?
True response time is btw response time or black to white response time i.e. 1/framerate (in seconds). Meaning the time taken for a completely dimmed pixel (black) to glow completely white (full rgb).
I've found that most people in stores like Best Buy or Staples that are supposed to able to tell you things like these don't even know the difference between refresh rate and response time. When I was looking for a new monitor I asked the guy at buy for the refresh rate and was told it was 1ms, the other thing I found is that people there will just tell you it's best when they have no clue. For instance I was told that a $199 monitor at Staple had a 144hz refresh rate and after a two second Google search I found it was as I figured 60hz. Just do your homework online and order from Amazon or some other online store.
at first this video seems a pretty comercial one with that short duration to explain this bit complex topic, but actually you optimized well that time and its been some very useful information links to check. Thumbs up
I just buy Cinematic IPS displays, I much rather have beautiful colours then 1-2 less ms response time.
I have two monitors. One with 100% accurate rgb colors and 7 ms response time and the other was noticabley less color accurate with 1 ms response time. I prefer all my games to be played on the more accurate colored monitor including the competitive ones. The white washed colors of the other monitor just throws me off
yra i get what you're saying
Thumbs up if you watch Fast as Possible at 2x Fast as Possible Speed!
you my friend are a revolutionist
I just read that and clicked on it as Luke was ranting about tech quickie vs super fun. Looked and sounded hilarious.
i have a monitor with 1ms. This weekend i went to my grandma's house and took my ps4 with me. I connected it to her TV and oh my got it was terrible.
Good video Josh Nichols.
If you have a monitor with 1 or 2ms response time, don't forget to turn on motion blur! Kappa
Pls don't listen to this man.
I am not listening to you
@@pcelis19 I will insert a listening device inside your shampoo bottle and there's nothing you can do to stop me.
@@lordswaggity1213 you assume i use shampoo that was your first mistake buddy.
Response time is a number which says how fast you will be able to watch 50 s
Shades Of Gray.
I tend to not care how beautiful an image looks. I'm the kind of person who will turn down the settings on a game way WAY down (sometimes even to minimum) if it means getting a consistently high frame rate. The only exception being resolution which I MUCH prefer keeping at native. That is the last thing I will turn down.
Higher input lag and response times though, they turn me off. I notice it too much and it throws me off.
1:45 that kiss sound killed me
Touching that pocket constantly is very distracting.
I don't give a flying fuck about it.
MRsjovealek I mean who cares seriously just enjoy the video.
I think he reads a script and changes the page or something. I see Linus doing the same thing
I was wondering what the hell he was doing as well. It seemed like he was checking to make sure someone hadn't stolen his phone every 2-3 seconds.
Dear Luke, stop playing with the audio box on your side. Thanks, PoeTayToe
+Poe Tay Toe That's the remote for the teleprompter.
I noticed that too. I couldn’t unsee it once I saw it the first time.
1:13 "What?! My download is already finished? Impossible! *checks transmission* oh...."
Who else was absolutely blown away by that fast-action sound effect?
Yeah lol
Touching your transmitter every couple of seconds is distracting me, Luke!
Different shades of Grey... xD
0:46 murdered my eyeballs.
Best gaming monitor in 2018? Let me know guys!
so is 7 ms good or bad?
Ali Radi that’s what I’m trying to found out
Depends. FPS you'll want 1ms
For hardcore gaming, bad.
i have an 1080p 60hz 24" 8ms ips monitor...
its been my first time playing games above 30fps
i cant notice shait but im happy leaving my laptop behind xD
xD
Victor Escamilla i recently upgraded to a 1080p monitor with a 1ms response time it is visably better in fast pace games like titanfall compared to my tv that has a 10ms response time. there not how ever much differance when watching a movie or in semi slow pace games like fallout.
Nathan Lowton g
I think some of it has to do with compression while streaming. For some reason Mandalorian on Disney + really doesn't like my B7 oled. It's not always that show either, and it seems to occur most often during dark, particle filled scenes. or how they do the post for that show.
So, I'm looking at a monitor. Specifically the Dell S2316M monitor. It's got great reviews, it's only $99, and it's a 1080p, 60Hz, IPS panel. But it has a 6ms resp. time. My main focus with this build is gaming. CS, Battlefield, and most AAA titles. Is the 6ms a deal breaker?
***** That's the first thing I tried. But even TN, or God forbid VA panels, with a 144Hz refresh rate. were just about double the price. With the cheapest being an IPS 120Hz monitor with a 5Ms resp. time, for $194.99
GravelsNotAFood
pay attention to repose time just as much as refresh rate. i messed up and bought something with trash response time and its horrible. because of the trail behind moving stuff i cant see any detail when moving around. i even overclocked by monitor to 120hz and it doesn't help at all
mine is BAAAAAAD. like mine is the epidemy of shit response time. im not saying that all displays are going to be like mine, im just saying careful what u buy
+DaRoyalPlatypus what monitor do you have and what is its response time?
lol monitor spec sheets are a joke, don't believe anything they say (besides like, the type of connections it offers, but even the power consumption is usually a lie)
For example the most BASIC information on any monitor spec sheet will say 16.7 million colours. Bullshit. Liquid crystal displays don't even come CLOSE to displaying 16.7 million colours, not even half, and most monitors(TN I'm looking at you) not even a quarter of that.
But the biggest lie on all those spec sheets is usually the contrast ratio. It'll say something like 1 000 000:1 or some bullshit like that. Goodluck, that's dynamic, meaning it adjusts contrast on the fly which means you might get darker darks, but it adjusts the contrast for EVERYTHING on screen, so when you get darker darks you'll get darker EVERYTHING. At best they are usually about 800:1 for a good monitor, about 300:1 for a crappy generic came-with-my-prebuilt one.
In a bit of technological irony, our old "obsolete" CRT monitors and TVs did response times, colours, and contrasts order of magnitudes better than modern screens. They just were huge and used a lot of power and also burned out your eyeballs.
But my monitor is actually 25inch so they are speaking the truth
Issajoke
I have a 1080p 144hz 1ms 24'' screen
+McAkkeezz I have a 720p 30hz 42ms 14" screen
+McAkkeezz I have those exact specs, but mine is the Asus VG248QE, I use 120hz lightboost instead of 144hz because it's actually faster.
Same here
+McAkkeezz I have a 1440p, IPS, 144Hz, G-Sync 1ms 27" screen. Owned.
+Phantom Reality Picture quality and refresh rate/response times are all important for competitive gamers, it's just that refresh rate and response time are usually more important. I'd be really interested to try one of the new 144 hz ips panels to see if the slightly higher response times are worth it for the much better picture quality, though.
Also, calibrating a tn panel will only do so much since they literally cannot display as many colors as IPS panels.
Rule of Thumb for any buying online: Check the creator of the product's website for specs.
This video will hit this channels most popular videos pretty fast.
i cant understand witch better 5ms or 1ms for gaming ?
Hussin Al 1ms is the best for gaming,5ms and 6ms is decent,but if you have a monitor that is 8ms or above 10ms it is not bad but is not great and if you a monitor that is above 20ms then than means that you have a very sh***y monitor.
Danish Hazlan is a 2ms monitor good?
H.Cruzz10 sure
Is 11 good? For Xbox one x 4K tv hdr
Great video, I didn't know most of this.
Luke does tech shit so fast that half the video is the ad 😂
i swear in my moms life i got linus at the ad of this video and that will probably will be the only ad i have watched 30 seconds all long
Why is he yelling at us ;---;
Its just presentation voice
This comment is sponsored by LYNDA.COM
Bero256 , really ? who make a Porn website in Java ?
No ultrawides listed from LG on the website
I have a 34um57 (2560x1080) IPS LED with AMD FreeSync
this was edited like a top 10 compilation
Hello #Bernie2016
We have a economically clueless person that wants to start a comment war. What's new...
+Platinum Edits At least he's not a refuckican lol
+Cameron _ _ a what??? Lololololol
Platinum Edits A refuckican is another word for a republican, AKA a person who will re fuck over the USA.
+Cameron _ _ so you think supporting someone that doesn't think a 90% tax is too high isn't going to be bad for the US??
your focus should be 60% hz and 4-% response time. anything 5ms below and 75hz is going to be decent for competitive gaming, but you want 144hz, and 244hz is not needed but if you want to go that route, sure. rediculous saturation, 244hz, and 1ms response time would be the best monitor for competition as you can see people more clearly, and faster.
so can someone tell me? what is the more accurate beetwen 1ms GTG with 1 ms MPRT ? sorry for my bad eng
This video needs an update! thanks luke
is it best to leave my response time faster or fastest?
Faster or slow
I have a 4ms monitor. Does that affect my input lag or no
He said it doesn’t 😐
When i bought my monitor i picked it because it had built in speakers and two hdmi ports. Later i found out that it had 1 ms response time.
Can you make a tech tips video on Clock Cycles / Why mixing ram frequencies results in throttling the greater ram to the speed of the lesser. Something along those lines, I think it'd interesting
The extrem gamer monitor with the lowest reponse time is any CRT you can pick up for like 10$
Is there a huge difference between 1 ms response time and 6 ms response time? And are there HUGE difference between 60Hz and 144Hz? Can I game on a 60Hz monitor with 6 ms?
I have a 5ms LG 60Hz display. I can confirm, that gaming on a 60hz display, is acceptable, but not preferable.
I'm looking into upgrading. There even is a big difference between 60 and 75Hz, the biggest the Hz, the less difference.
But yes, there is a HUGE difference between 60 and 144Hz.
As long as it is under 10ms, you shouldn't see any ghosting, i am not sure though.
I hate the fact that you had to wait 3 years to get a decent reply 😳
Yo I appreciate the reply LOL, I got a new monitor. 165hz with 0.5 ms response time and it’s honestly very good. 60hz is still playable but I just dislike it on PC. I feel like I concentrate on the refresh rate more than the game itself.
I have a setup video on my channel btw, you don’t need to watch it but I have the monitor in there 😳🤘
Hey guys, I know I'm too late but Should I get a 4ms 165hz curved monitor or a 1ms 144hz normal monitor with pretty thick bezels?
so basically a 4ms ips panel is the best "high end" bang for the buck. I just found some good deals for a 4k and a 2k monitor, So I just bought 5k retail worth of monitors for about 1k. not all that much has changed in the last 5 years except for prices and the features of the flagship models
i think in his spare time luke might be a serial killer.
Is 5ms good I have a 4K 1ms 60hz i need 240hz and 4K and am upgrading to this
this being in as fast as possible really made the video title accurate
Ok slick Thanks, I was wondering about the difference between Refresh rate and Response time:)
Funny thing, I actually experienced less ghosting on my TV than my 5ms response time monitor.
lol
4ms IPS panel vs 1ms TN????? imm needs a new monitor
How can a pixel begin to transition to a different colour before the screen refreshes (Faster than 60Hz)
For the first time, i'll actually back an as. Lynda.com is the shit. Super helpful, super informative and makes you actually want to learn. If you're anywhere from 18-25 and looking for college level skills, its a great site.
cant companies be sued for falsely advertising the wrong specs on a porduct?
With all those "shades of grey", I was surprised that you didn't make a pun involving the book.
Never expected to see LTT's ad from IT management to be here lol, I thought I was watching Linus Tech Tips xD
Little do you know, I already have a Lynda.com account for free. . .FOREVER.
Will Taran be returning to do more Techquickies in future?
the lower left of the video was off sync with the rest of the video for me and it is about monitor response time so was that done on purpose or a accident?
Is 5 ms response time good for a 100$ 1080 p 23inch
if you dont want good color or high refresh rate
Hey guys, I want a 2k monitor but frames are kinda the most important thing to me....y'know, outside response time (And even then, as long as it's relatively fast, I'm fine, I don't need something for a twitch reaction game like CS:GO, just something that displays a lot of frames at a high resolution and doesn't look ghosty.)
that display lag website doesnt give response times
I'm still using the Samsung SyncMaster T220 that I got about 8 years ago. It's has it's 2ms response time stamped right on the front. It's served me well even though it's 16:10.
+homeycdawg I still have a SyncMaster P2070 from 2009 which I am using now and it also has a 2ms response time and has worked quite well for games even though its only 1600x900 resolution max. I have pushed it to 1920x1080 using Nvidia control panel and it works, although its not the same as it actually being a full HD monitor and I do get a warning appear saying "not optimum mode" every so often.
I still use it for games, but I did recently order a Dell Ultrasharp UP2516D 25 inch 2560 x 1440 IPS monitor for photo/video editing as it has 100% Adobe RGB, 100% sRGB, 100% REC 709, 98% DCI-P3 and I need the color accuracy over very fast response times. It supposedly has either a 5ms or 6ms response time, so may also be good for gaming, but that isn't why I bought it but I will try it for that when I get it and see how well it looks on some games. but still may use the Syncmaster for games.
The Lynda ad has taken 2 out of 5 mins of this video
+MinusEloso
...and its at the end. You literally couldn't ask for a better way for them to make ads without bothering you...
We have a phrase for this in my country. Gamer Gimmick.
LG 24MP59G SUPPORTS BOTH G-SYNC AND FREESYNC ?
CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME ?