“I’ve Personally Emailed Richard Gadd” Piers Morgan’s Baby Reindeer Mailbag
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 05. 2024
- Piers Morgan dedicates this week’s mailbag entirely to the comments on his explosive Baby Reindeer interview with Fiona Harvey, the woman identified as the ‘real’ Martha from the Netflix hit show. Many people praised the actress, Jessica Gunning, for her performance as Martha. Others questioned whether Fiona should’ve even been invited on the show due to concerns about her mental health. Piers also agrees with viewers calling for Richard Gadd to be interviewed on Piers Morgan Uncensored, and confirmed that he’s personally emailed the Baby Reindeer creator himself.
Subscribe to stay up-to-date on all Uncensored content.
Follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on:
Twitter: / piersuncensored
Instagram: / piersmorganuncensored
Facebook: / piersmorganuncensored
TikTok: / piersmorganuncensored
Follow Piers Morgan on:
Twitter: / piersmorgan
Instagram: / piersmorgan
#babyreindeer #piersmorgan #interview #martha #piersmorganuncensored #piersmorganinterview - Zábava
I’m sooo confused about why we are sooo hung up on the “Martha” character when there’s a whole episode about a famous male writer drugging and raping a young man?? Why aren’t we causing a stir about that??
I agree %100
Because the movie was about Martha
Famous people only get prosecuted when their clique wants to throw them under the bus. Usually in some kind of cover up or power struggle.If the clique is happy with them they can do no wrong.
Good point.
Might be because byte paper trail is not as good behind that guy. Fiona/Martha is quite manic and kept sending letters and email clues and proof
The reason the actress nailed the character of Martha was that she had all of the voicemails, emails and texts to study from
But Gadd literally said he's only got voicemails??? How's that work then?
I thought she said she didn't know anything about Martha (fiona). Hard to believe based on her performance though.
@@Pat_S She probably stalked Fiona!
😂😂😂 plot twist @@Essemm52
Old there aren’t any unless they are fabricated. There’s are no receipts.
Thank you for not forcing us to listen to her again. Well done
Precisely... could not stand her... such a pointless person.
@@stavrosgazis5824 what a disgusting thing to say. are you not also pointless? what is the 'point' to people exactly? vile.
No one is forcing you to do anything
Completely agree with you on never giving that rude woman a platform to run her mouth. Imarn was a disgrace
Now I think about it, why would Netflix provide any evidence if their aim is to keep Martha’s identity anonymous? If Fiona wants to take them to court, that’s when they can provide evidence.
Exactly my thought! If they release the evidence they will have to confirm the real Martha identity
they can redact her name and black out personal details to show that he actually received the e-mails, messages etc its not that hard to do.
That’s really smart
@@wrfootball3847It isn’t Netflix’s fault if the real Martha was recognised on the net. She should have cancelled her profiles.
@@Libri_amore_e_fantasiaI don’t get when ppl say she was so easy to find? Is she the only heavy set, Scottish accented woman in the world or?
Why is no one mentioning his awful abuse by that producer??? The world is nuts!
Exactly!!! 🤮🤮
Bc he’s a man. The world only goes on witch hunts for women.
???
I totally concur with your comment. It baffles me no one has gone after this man
Exactly!! Like wtf
Thank you for advising that woman won't be appearing again on your programme; she was incredibly rude to not only you but also your other panellists. She had nothing to contribute to the conversation, and her lack of control maybe something she needs to take up with a professional.
She came across that she was under the influence of alcohol and drugs! She doesn’t represent me as a black woman…don’t let that Batch back on!!! 😡
Really? She rightfully pointed out that in the series IT SAYS IT IS DRAMATIZED!!! This lawsuit is going N O W H E R E lol and the lady is an absolute psychopath
I’m delighted that you’re not having Imran on again … her behaviour was beyond unprofessional. It ruined a really good debate.
Good decision on not having her back...she was so rude and disruptive...spoiled the whole debate.
I noticed Fiona had been given a glass of water for the interview. Surely Piers realises this whole thing started with her being given free drink.
He gives everyone he interviews a glass of water
Eggbert, Neo and Keith 😂
Oh no! I hadn’t even thought about that 😂
@@smashyrashy I guess my comment went over your head. Never mind 😃
🤣
Lmao. I almost spit my coffee, "his inbox might be a little full" 😂
“Stalking is horrible, I’ve been on the receiving end of it a little bit myself”. Isn’t this the man who was hacking peoples phones to gain their personal and private information?
About time you ditched Imarn Ayton... that woman is insufferable, a professional victim who can't/won't hear any opinion other than hers... she won't be missed!!!
One thousand thumbs up..horrible horrible person
Sorry missed her dismissal....what happened??? Was it because of her drunk performance??? Did Peirce call her out???
@@stephenmarshall8367believe it’s more a suggestion that I firmly agree with she is just one of them and can really wind you up with their stupidity.
@@stephenmarshall8367 yes Piers said she was insufferable and that she ruined the whole debate and she wouldn't be asked back again.
Yes, please! She is so unprofessional.
Imarn was so dysfunctional. Is was very hard to watch her make a fool of herself.
Obnoxious, entitled & self-important. Bullying tactics employed with impunity.
She comes across as unhinged. I find her deeply disturbing, she makes me physically shudder.
She needs help
it was, my insides were cringing for her I can't shake the 2nd hand embarrassment. I also really like Andy Signore's follow up about it LOL on his channel Popcorned Planet. My husband doesn't care about any of the baby reindeer drama but I had to make him watch both Piers big videos on this (Fiona interview + the debate with a drunk skunk joining along) and now he's hooked on the drama just as bad as me
I stopped watching because of her, she made it a very unpleasant experience. The other people had important things to say, nobody wants to listen to her garbage.
'I accept his inbox to be a little full' 😂😂😂
The interview with Imarn was so painful. So happy she is gone!
Thank you for banning that ridiculous woman. You are 100% correct, she ruined that panel.
QUESTION ?... Was Imarn Ayton drunk or on drugs ?
@@canadawoodworkssignage6564Or unstable, weird behaviour
She was high on the smell of her own gas. What an unbearable ****
@@canadawoodworkssignage6564 Good question! That's just what I wondered. To be honest she (to me at least) really did seem like she was under the influence of something.
I’ve never been as annoyed and confused by someone, she tows the line of intellect but in reality she’s just a spoilt child
Thank you for agreeing to NEVER have that woman back on the show!
Agreed! That was so hard to watch . Such a hateful gross person
'based' on a true story and some parts have been fictionalised, it literally says it in the credits if the show after every episode.
Why do people keep ignoring this?
because they want to be offended or upset by something so they play dumb to the truth to fit their narrative. Seems to happen everywhere these days, ignore the actual facts and play dumb so you can be outraged for views.
Netflix representative said under oath it was all true..
because it doesn't support their narrative. plus old people love to protect abusers all that "duty of care" nonsense. The public found her using public information, why should netflix have to keep it out?
Disclaimer is too little too late
@@007IceBaby old people as opposed to someone called baby?
Well said about that awful woman panelist.
She was the most vile ever person! Good on piers! 😂
@@rachelburge2338 Wasn't she the most obnoxious Creature imaginable? That mouth and the arrogant and condescending looks on her face almost drove me to switch the panel discussion off!
I've seen that woman on shows with Piers before and she is always awful but that night she came across as intoxicated. Glad Piers won't be bringing her back. 😊
I'd never watch that awful woman again, ever, just irritating not entertaining and any point she was trying to make got lost because of her stupid behaviour
100 %
Thank you PIERS for listening to us in the comment section. Thank you for not inviting that rude, aggressive, patronising woman AGAIN on your panel. She did ruin the discussions and ruined the chance for us to hear a balanced view of discussion with the other the gentlemen. She was painfully disrespectful to all the men on the panel. Thank you PIERS👏🏿👏🏿
100% agreed. NEVER AGAIN
She had to add her comments in “a black style”. Not a lady. And a racist.
Thank you from me too!
Yes 🙌 thank you
Agreed! She was aggressive and ruined it for everyone 👎
Part of me really appreciates Netflix for not saying “based” because that would imply Richard didn’t go through r, s/a & stalking. I feel like it’s them saying “we believe you Richard” I appreciate that
Thank you for saying that female you had on the panel was rude. She was way out of line and I never want to watch anything from her again.
I remember Richard Gadd specifically saying that one of the things they changed was the conviction, he said they never convicted her of a crime.
Absolutely, and if you watch the interview again, you’ll notice that’s the only issue she raises herself to discuss
Then they should of said the story was fictionalised
@@manifestingcocreator3221based on a true story. Go learn what that means
@@manifestingcocreator3221 'Based on a true story' means _exactly_ that.
@undercoveragent9889 it's said in the beginning of the series it's a "real story", not based on a true story. Maybe they're all actors taking part in a massive world prank 😂
Im still recovering from that panel with Imarn (british BLM leader), shes more insane and scary than Fiona!
don't remind me. That was horrible.
Awful woman, performing for the camera. Surely her position with BLM after that will need to be reviewed. I had to watch that interview in two parts. 🤦♀️
She definitely is mentally unwell.. her cognitive dissonance is off the charts
Her attitude was funny like she was high but her take was accurate. Idk why Piers was supporting Fiona.
And extremely rude and annoying.
“I’ve personally emailed Richard Gadd although ofcourse I accept his inbox is full” 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Brilliant as usual! Your upkeep in fulfilling our curiosity has been remarkable. Keep up the fabulous work!
Imarm is a different kind of disgusting individual it comes with aggravation.
a junkie witch
I was in voice conversations with Fiona since last November. She left voice messages daily on my food page. Most were rambling. Some were fairly short, only a couple of minutes. Some were as long as 8 or 10 minutes. She did not seem threatening in any way, but it did appear to me that she thought we had some kind of relationship or friendship. I was always very nice to her as a response. The messages stopped on the 13th of April. I did wonder why until the day I watched your interview with her and I thought hey, I know that person. I checked and it was THE Fiona Harvey who had been sending me the messages. I recognised her voice and her face. I think I dodged a bullet there.
I would change your number if I were you.
What food page? On FB? or youtube?
And who might you be?
@@cultmamacultmama3571 who are you asking?
@@cultmamacultmama3571The English Kitchen
ONE OF THE BEST DECISION YOU MADE PIERS NOT HAVING HER BACK ON YR SHOW, SHE WAS RUDE, ARROGANT & DOWNRIGHT IGNORANT.
I DON'T KNOW HOW IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A DEBATE WHEN SHE THOUGHT IT WAS ALL ABOUT HER & ONLY HER OPINION.
ALTHOUGH I WATCHED 'TIL THE END, 5 MINS OF LISTENING TO HER WAS MORE THAN ENOUGH.
As a recent victim of serious stalking, you need to understand that the stalker is a fantasist and believes everything that they say. Their fervour is unrelenting. Their belief in what they are doing is pure. But their reality is entirely skewed.
This woman volunteered to go on the show, and lord knows I would never watch a Piers Morgan show otherwise, but bear in mind the aforementioned -- deluded individual (poss personality disorder), ill-equipped to deal...
She didn't have a media agent advising her - she's just presented as the (potentially unstable) individual that she is. Gahhhh.
The stalker always claims to be the victim.
People will never understand unless it happens to them.
So glad you have finally rid us of that offensive woman Iman. Thank you
💃🏻 💃🏻 💃🏻.
Is he not gonna have her on again?? I don’t anything with her or those types of people who are woke racist and delusional
@AileenBartlett-ym4ec Hear! Hear! She is the most obnoxious Creature I've ever seen. She's worse than the ever offensive Tessa Dunlop. Had to go for my blood pressure medication and even contemplated a
Xanax! Thank you Aileen for voicing your opinion (and mine).
Agree.
Yes I cannot watch when she is on
Thank you Piers for blasting Imarn and deciding not to bring her back. She was an unbelievably disgusting person who deserves no attention.
The story on Netflix was about a man named Donny and a woman named Martha. Not sure how a woman named Fiona has a case.
Precisely. I like the way u think!
The Netflix exec also said in parliament that she was a convicted stalker.
"I have a feeling his email box may be full" 10/10 joke
She's in a basement right now, writing "Mrs Piers Morgan" over and over again in a notebook
😂😂😂😂
Hahahhahaaaa!!!🤣🤣🤣
Actually she is very mad at him 😂😂😂 is accusing him of making money at her expenses
😂😂😂😂
Thank you for showing respect to the audience and the other members of the panel by banning her... what a spoiled and rude brat!
“I think his inbox might be a bit full” 😂
Nobody can compete with Piers. He is the ultimate interviewer who does his research before every interview. The king stands tallest
Lol Piers you have a new friend for life! 😂😂😂
Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity (2004) is a treatise by political scientist and historian Samuel P. Huntington (1927-2008). The book attempts to understand the nature of American identity and the challenges it will face in the future:
ln describing the American identity, Huntington first contests the notion that the country is, as often repeated, "a nation of immigrants". He writes that America's founders were not immigrants, but settlers, since British settlers came to North America to establish a new society, as opposed to migrating from one existing society to another one as immigrants do. Later peoples who joined the culture present in the original British colonies, already established by these settlers, were indeed immigrants.
Many people point to the American Creed as the core of American identity. Huntington defines the American Creed as embodying the "principles of liberty, equality, individualism, representative government, and private property".[2] Yet Huntington asks:
Would America be the America it is today if in the 17th and 18th centuries it had been settled not by British Protestants but by French, Spanish, or Portuguese Catholics? The answer is no. It would not be America; it would be Quebec, Mexico, or Brazil.
Huntington argues that, of all the nations in Europe, and of all the colonies, America alone developed the American Creed, and that this simple observation requires explanation. This observation leads to two conclusions: that America was an English colony, and that America alone was formed as a result of the Reformation.
To advance his argument about the contribution to America of its English heritage, he says:
The political and legal institutions the settlers created in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries embodied in large part the institutions and practices of England's late-sixteenth-century and early-seventeenth-century "Tudor constitution." These included: the concept of a fundamental law superior to and limiting government; the fusion of executive, legislative, and judicial functions and the division of power among separate institutions and governments; the relative power of the legislature and chief executive; the merger of the "dignified" and "efficient" functions in the chief executive; a two-house legislature; the responsibility of the legislature to their local constituencies; a legislative committee system; and primary reliance for defense on militia rather than a standing army............;
😂😂😂
The Palestine Communist Party (Yiddish: פאלעסטינישע קומוניסטישע פארטיי, Palestinische Komunistische Partei, abbreviated PKP; Arabic: الحزب الشيوعي الفلسطيني) was a political party in the British Mandate of Palestine formed in 1923 through the merger of the Palestinian Communist Party and the Communist Party of Palestine. In 1924 the party was recognized as the Palestinian section of the Communist International.[1] In its early years, the party was predominantly Jewish, but held an anti-Zionist position。
In 1923, at the party congress, a position of support was adopted in favour of the Arab national movement as a movement "opposed to British imperialism and denounced Zionism as a movement of the Jewish bourgeoisie allied to British imperialism", a move that won it membership of the Comintern.The Party was also opposed to Zionist settlement in Palestine and to the Histadrut and its Jewish labor policy.
During the mid-1920s the party began recruiting Arab members. Karl Radek, as head of the Comintern's Eastern department, instructed the PCP that it must "become a party of Arab workers to which Jews can belong." According to British intelligence sources, the first Arab joined the party in 1924. By 1925 the party had eight Arab members. In that year the party was in contact with the Palestine Arab Workers Society. Simultaneously the party established relations with elite sections of the local Arab society. According to Fred Halliday, many Christian Arabs were attracted towards the party since they, being Orthodox, felt emotional bonds with Russia. Representatives from the party at the League against Imperialism's 1927 conference in Brussels clashed with Poale Zion, forming an anti-Zionist bloc with Arab nationalists from Palestine, Egypt and Syria within the League.
However, when the Comintern made its ultra-left turn in 1928 and denounced cooperation with national bourgeoisies in the colonies, the process of strengthening of the party amongst the Arab population was stalled. In 1930 the Comintern did yet another sharp turn, urging its Palestinian section to speedily increase the Arab representation amongst its cadres and leaders.
In December 1930, PCP ran in the elections for the Jewish Assembly of Representatives in Mandate Palestine, using a front organization called the Proletarian Party (Harishima Haproletarit). The party failed dismally.
During the rule of Joseph Stalin, the party militants in the Soviet Union suffered from heavy purges,[citation needed] including numerous people close to party leader Leopold Trepper.[citation needed] Daniel Averbach, one of the founders of the party, was brutally beaten and went mad.[7][citation needed] Tepper, himself, was expelled from Palestine by the British in 1929 and moved to Europe. During World War II, he led the Red Orchestra spy ring. In 1934 Radwan Al Hilu, a Palestinian Arab, was appointed by the Comintern as the secretary general of the party which he held until his resignation from the party in 1943.
In 1943 the party split, with the Arab members forming the National Liberation League in 1944.The PCP and NLL both initially opposed the 1947 UN Partition Plan, but accepted it after the Soviet Union endorsed it.The PCP changed its name to MAKEI, the Communist Party of Eretz Israel, after endorsing partition in October 1947. This was the first time the communists had used the term 'Eretz Israel' ('Land of Israel') in a party's name. However, it had been a widespread practice in Mandate Palestine to translate 'Palestine' as 'Eretz Israel' when translating into Hebrew.The party still viewed partition as a temporary detour on the road to a binational state. The two parties maintained contact during the 1948 war, and after the war, the NLL merged with Maki (the new name adopted by Maki, meaning the Communist Party of Israel) within the new state's borders.
From 1951 the Jordanian Communist Party organized Palestinians in the West Bank while a new Palestinian Communist Organization mobilized members in Gaza City. In 1975 a Palestinian Communist Organization was formed in the West Bank as a branch of the Jordanian party. In 1982 it severed ties with Jordan and merged with the organization in Gaza to become the new Palestine Communist Party. This Party later became the Palestinian People's Party. In 1987, it joined the Palestine Liberation Organization。
And he deserves her.
Thats literally exactly what Martha in Baby Reindeer would do if there were 3 more episodes. Going on on an interview and saying that Gadd was the one stalking her and obsessing over her. SHE LITERALLY MADE THAT ARGUMENT IN THE SHOW IN THE COMEDY CLUB SCENE
But Gadd DID become obsessed with her.He went to her house to have sex with her,because he couldn't stop masterbating over her.Right?
Pierce, makes me feel a lot better after you said Imarn is not welcomed back to the show. It made me sick the amount of disrespect she gave to all and only versing her narcissistic behavior. Mate I'm in late, cheers from AUSTRALIA. Keep up the GREAT WORK MATE! We love you!
"His inbox might be full" 🤣
Why can't we find his industry abuser in the same way. Where's the uproar about that???
I agree. That crime is far more abhorrent but people are protecting him
Exactly but he liked him for the drugs
@@michellesayers5346 100%
Jesus finally someone said it
that guy probably lawyered up and sent out fancy legal things like NDA's and threats to sue. he's at the other end of the power dynamic than fiona so he's probably got his privacy locked and loaded
Well done 👏 ✔️ 👍 never ever let that woman back on your show....your guests and your viewers deserve better
Imarn's behavior was absolutely reprehensible! Thank you for not allowing her to come back... ever.
Well said. And thank you for firing her from any further panels. I’ve been so frustrated with her rudeness for some time now. Hoping you would eventually have enough once in for all. 🙏 ❤
Plot twist. Piers starts stalking richard.
😂😂😂
He's planning on getting him on the crack and then we know what happens next
It would give Megan and Harry a break 😂😂😂
I love a good stalk
@@timwoodger7896No. He shouldn't give Meghan and Harry a break. Unless it's Harry's nose.
It says true story at the start of the first episode but in the credits it states it’s based on real events with some characters, storylines etc changed for dramatisation. So the jail thing could be fiction
Ok so which is it??😮 nope Netflix screwed up
No, they covered themselves. Read the credits
The jail scene is fiction. Richard Gadd said in numerous interviews a month ago, that he added in the jail scene to make the show come to an end. Search on CZcams for Richard Gadd talking in interviews about his show, he’ll give you an answer to your question.
@@karin9373first thing you read is ‘this is a true story’ no one reads the end credits or later episodes, Netflix know they did wrong
@@michellesayers5346how did they do wrong it's written in the credits as long as it's written then they are cover ..was it ethical maybe that's the question not wether they are covered
Well done you Piers for not allowing Imarn to return to your show. She is the rudest and most disrespectful person I have ever seen on TV! and using the racist card was just ridiculous and low of her... consistency of bad behaviour throughout ...
I find it startlingly hard to believe Netflix would not do their research and ensure the information was correct regarding the jail sentence.
That Imarn woman was absolutely horrible, good to see Piers calling her out for her ignorant, narcissistic behaviour, Thankfully she won't be back on his panel, she doesn't deserve anyone giving her airtime.
He will bring her back. Piers loves the conflict 😅
Jeremy vine will he loves a race baiter like old mad shola
can't agree enough. I'm literally hunting down comments like this to show as much support of this decision as I can LOL disrespectful aggressive people do not deserve the platform
She was there to represent a particular group and the way they are. Succeeded PERFECTLY. Very typical.
witch
That woman on the panel how bloody rude
100% feral !
Yaaaay she’s never gonna be back on the show that made me smile don’t have to hear that silly woman again
If Netflix was worried about getting sued they would have removed it from the platform. But they don't need to because Netflix lawyers will have gone through this with a fine tooth comb before taking this programme on.
Yes, Pierce! No more of that woman for debates! 🎉❤
PLEASE never have that smug woman on your show again. Arrogance!
Creature you mean
She is smarter and more interesting than most people...chill out you misogynist.
@@Bombabingbong66She's about as smart as a monkey with a rubics cube.
No - bring Fiona on again. See what she back tracks on & what she accuses Piers of.
Did u listen? He just said she won't be invited again
Man say’s he takes stalking very seriously but used to hack people’s phones for a living. 😂
This entire interview was hysterical. I laughed so hard at the whole thing.
Richard also said he fantasised about her, missed her when she left him alone, he also went to her home and spied on her (after they went out for cake -Ep 1).
He’s been doing the show as a play for years, reliving everything night after night.
It makes me wonder who is addicted to who? He was leading her on and messing with her.
I question him as a person. I’m just as wary of him as I am of her.
I have been thinking the same, who would want to reliving it over and over, is the rape true?I think 2 messed up people met and that never ends well but they both could end up making loads of money, it's making me think that there is a hell of a lot more to come at about both of them but it's making really good telly
Did you even see the show? Fiona said it wasnt her during interview. So she gets nothing.
He went to her house uninvited and had sex with her, has everyone forgotten this??
@@cultmamacultmama3571 I think that part was “fantasy” in the show to illustrate how he would fantasise about “Martha” as it then cut to the scene of him in bed with his girlfriend. But understandable how it came across that way 👍🏾
@@cultmamacultmama3571he didn’t sleep with her ! I thought that too because I watched that scene out of sequence but it was a fantasy he had to help him perform with trans Teri. The homosexual rapist GR (real life initials of the guy), had messed with Richards mind so much that his sexuality was wrecked. He was a broken wreck by the time he met Fiona.
Well done Piers , i am delighted to see you have called out that rude individual.
Both felonies and misdemeanors can be removed from public record through expungement. This woman is a lawyer, and I am sure she petitioned the court to have it hidden.
Thank you soo much for eliminating that woman from the panel. Now we would be able to really hear and understand the debates on your channel
One of the biggest lies she told was that she had never watched the show. She lost all credibility after that. Stalker OR not, you would 100% watch a show that is supposedly about you.
Or maybe she didn't watch because it wasn't a flattering portrayal, and it might be too cringe for her to see herself depicted on film, the way a person might not want their picture taken or too see a cringe home video of them dancing at a wedding. Just another perspective. Peace.
she made hundreds of public fb posts while watching it
She 100 percent watched Baby Reindeer. Why lie Fiona?
people with mental illnesses will say anything...you are watching somebody normal.
I don't disbelieve not aspects actually I had a CZcamsr make kind of a mean video about me. It wasn't the entire video it was just a portion of a live stream and it gave me so much anxiety to know that I was getting mocked that I couldn't bring myself to watching it It took me many many months before I even listened to a few snippets. If I was the subject of a massive show on Netflix it would make me so sick to my stomach I don't think I could handle it especially if I was obviously the bad guy in it or had done something wrong. I think she most likely saw a bunch of snippets I think she probably asked someone she knew to maybe check it out for her I don't think she has seen 0% of it but I do think maybe it was a lot to take in and super embarrassing so idk.
Yaaay! Thank you for declaring that the god awful woman Imarn won't ever be invited back, thank you SO much!
Hope to god he doesn't replace her with Shouty Shola!!!!!
Why isn’t anyone talking about the guy who was giving him drugs so he could sexually abuse him. I just don’t understand why after watching all the talk is about the stalker, a woman with probable mental issues, and not the predatory sexual behaviour of a highly influential person the mind the mind boggles
I've tried to suffer through Imarn many many times and I'm thrilled you finally realized how she doesn't add to but takes away from the discussion. I do recall though when she apologized and did a 180 calling Meghan and Harry liars about the claims against his family. I give her credit for that. Loved Andy from popcorned planet, he's great fun and intelligent. Love seeing you on a regular basis Piers, thought the world ended when you walked off GMB 😊
I am so glad that you won’t have this rude woman on your show anymore.
That women on the panel was very annoying
And 20 years later I find myself here thinking Piers Morgan is one of the few honest media voices left.
And tucker
Good for people to see that anyone can be secretly harbouring abusive actions, good to remind people to be careful and check when we feel uncomfortable around someone even without evidence you never know...
Richard gadd has said a thousand times she did not go to jail in real life.
You have a link for this?
He never said it during the series --he said it afterwards at interviews--
So it’s not a true story as they stated
If she had been stalking, she’s instrumentally responsible for how easy it was for her real identity to be discovered.
Right?
Wow so true. What could Netflix have done different to "protect her identity".. cast a thinner actress? Like, this is insane. Writing the "meat curtains" bit into the show was authentic to HIS story. It's her fault for tweeting these things IRL.
@@GardenDoctorTrevwe don't live in a world where his story should be hidden or where he should be silenced. But we do live in one where its someone else's fault you did a 10 mil+ view interview. Crazy
@@ohroxo yes, I wonder if Paul Gadd might be able to sue her now for defamation of character.
Martha didn’t try to disguise who she was referring to with her personal “barbs”, at all.
@@ipredictariot6371 Gary Glitter's involved too!?! :D
(Paul)
Why would they speak about it if fiona is taking them to court. Wouldn't the smart thing be to save the evidence for the trial.
I had a stalker for 8 years. I have always emphatically been against guns or weapons but I carry 2 knives a taser and a non-lethal air gun that seduce the attacker for 30 minutes. It's scary. He was from another state and he used to just show up at my house and other places that I was out
if this stalker was a man, no one would be accusing Piers of any wrongdoing...remember, this is a dangerous and manipulative woman
The worst part is that she is harassing and targeting more people in real time 🥺 this is crazy and sad tbh
Her crimes date back to 1997. It was only a matter of time until she got some karma. Unfortunately, she’s not the type to understand “stop” or “no”. The moment she feels slighted by you, either rejected, fired from a job etc. you’ll be her next target.
Exactly
Special treatment for her it seems.
And he used her he even said he went to her for comfort he’s a nasty cut
@@jessl6239she isn’t lol😂
Netflix also thought black cleopatra was a true story...
True😂
hahaha good point
also they thought the Crown was real--I had to actually argue with people that the Crown was a bunch of made up garbage--
It is! According to the old lady's Grandma!! Lol 🤣🤣🤣
A whole lot of noise needs to be made to bring the male abuser to justice, I’m shocked that we are focusing on ‘Martha’ when that seems to be a done and dealt with issue. There’s some dangerous man out there, free, able to continue to do this !!!
So happy to hear your not having that beastly rude woman again🎉
QUESTION ?... Was Imarn Ayton drunk or on drugs ?
The disgraceful Imarn Ayton should be banned from the whole of social media. Not just on Piers show.
she doesn't have much of one anyway. she only had 7k followers on instagram when I dm'd her a little bit of advice after watching that debate LOL and if she blocked everyone else who did the same, like how she blocked me, then her reach is only that much smaller. surely no one will ever bring her on as a guest anywhere ever again, that was feral behavior that she doubled down on after the fact !
I rarely watch Piers or ever was a fan, but I'm kinda impressed by how direct Piers was with banning her from his channel.
@smoothsailin9351 are you telling me that approx. 7k people can tolerate that woman's post on their feed, daily?
@@notyourfrind9415 LOL surely its dropped now that they know how she act like !
@@notyourfrind9415 But I wouldn't know how many she lost, she blocked me after I dm'd her some advice LOL
She did blow it.!! Thankfully Piers Morgan took control.!!
If she didn’t stalk him, then why does she think this movie is about her? And why would she think this movie is about her when she says the actress doesn’t look like her?
All Piers talks about is where or not she was convicted. Richard Gadd emphatically stated that the real Martha wasn't
Yes..but not EVERYONE woulda seen THAT...but they would've thought she confessed and was convicted from the show...AND they told parliament she was a convicted stalker
@@Swansong321but she was involved in another case way before Gadd, but that I think was under a different last name. I guess she changed it to not get recognised as easy since that former case involved a high profile politician and got lots of attention back then in the media.
So, in that sense she is a convicted stalker.
This is information I have read and seen in the show itself but I have not confirmed it. I read the name "Muir" somewhere but I don't know if that is true or false 😅. Either way, if Fiona sues we will know because netflix can't confirm or deny anything now without stating at the same time that Fiona IS Martha, and they are not allowed to do that (because then she actually has ground for suing them) and that is probably why they are waiting.
He should’ve said that at the beginning it was portrayed as a true story lol are you silly
She was drugged up and drunk
@@beatricenilsson4530that’s only what the series says l that gaff was a narcissist and user he said she comforted him after he decided to sleep with a bloke for drugs
Thank you for respectfully dealing with that awful woman Imarn, she truly deserves not to be reinvited again.
I had to turn the panel off & I love Tatum & Popcorn Planet- but she was so frustrating that I couldn’t even watch it all. Spot on Linda! ❤
We thought you were dead Piers until all this Baby Reindeer 😅😅😅😅
Why is he still saying Richard said she went to jail, he made it clear in real life that she never
Fair play piers…that woman was obnoxious
I do think she violated him in the canal. I do think she stalked him. I do think she found his location and sent him all the letters/emails. I do think she harassed his family and attacked his girlfriend. Let her take them to court because they can prove everything.
Thank you for not inviting Imarn again! I went specifically because of that debate with her to her IG just to see the comment section after her performance. Only to see that she restricted all comments. Everybody was praising her for her performance! 😂 who are these people? Family members?
The stalking is going on lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Best news ever. I couldn't bare to listen to that narcissistic obnoxious woman. You have reported this story with great expertise Piers.
This whole thing is just as entertaining as the actual series 👍
Oh Piers, you are good for a laugh at yourself! 😂😂😂
Brad Pitt?? Love it🤣🤣🤣
"I have personally emailed Richard Gadd, thousands of times about getting on the show"
Good call for Piers to not just ban Imarn from the show but also telling the world that she's a pretty messed up human being.
what's real male sexual abuser in the film?? why is nobody speaking about him??
Welcome to the new normal
Good for you Piers. I’m glad you will never have that woman on your show again. She is disgustingly rude and absolutely painful to watch. Apart from her, that was a great panel discussion and hugely enlightening ! Thank You
Are not legal records public knowledge in UK? wondering why they haven't been shown yet.
Piers talking about Duty of Care 😂😂😂😂
milly dowler...
careful, he has lawyers and uses them
Spot on 🎉
He ignores duty of care if it can make him a few 💰💰💰💰
@@tan89284 Yup. He's a malignant narcissist who revels in the pain of others. He has the moral consistency of slime.