The variable pulse amplitude is what you will want as it is what will allow you to set the base voltage to keep the water polarized while pulsing the higher voltage later.
Have you been working with Ronnie or reading all his old posts? That's exactly why I have changed all my designs over the years-to try and get them closer to what he was doing.
Stan Meyer's goal was to produce Hydrogen from water while using a minimum amount of amperage. Therefore, an important key improvement in Bradk's project is to use a step down transformer, stepping down the voltage from the primary to the secondary and at the same time stepping up the amperage to the secondary side of the transformer at the same time. This step-up of output amperage will deliver more amperage to the tank-circuit and help to achieve the amperage limit needed to the electrolyte ,water, in the 10 Stan Meyer capacitors, hence achieving the catastrophic breakdown of water desired. The key is to change the windings in the primary side of the transformer to be different from the windings in the secondary in order to produce a step up in output amperage to the tank circuit.
What I think is going on with Stan Meyer's patents are; the wording of the patents was only written to protect his inventions from theft while keeping as much information secret as possible. I think the key to understanding Stan Meyers circuit is the Tank Circuit where the water has replaced the conventional dielectric, as compared to what is used in normal capacitors. The secondary side of the transformer circuit's blocking diode is for allowing the tank circuit amperage build up to charge until the amperage in the capacitors reaches a limit where there is a catastrophic destruction of the electrolyte water, where by the water is broken down into gas. If someone used this circuit with a standard capacitor the Capacitor would explode. Maybe the answer can be found by finding a way to adjust/increase the amperage inside the Stan Meyer capacitors. There are so many variables like the uf, size, composition, and shape of the capacitors. Maybe the Farads of the Stan Meyer capacitors is the key. Others have reproduced Stan's work so the time is worth it, reinvent the wheel and learn a lot.
I know the feeling....If there's one thing all this work reveals its that it is much more complex and difficult to reproduce than we initially thought.
looking good were all in the same boat I just got done in my lab Been working wile I can. Also Nice to here someone realize if you change anything it wont work as many cant grasp that lol Nice work and good to see your alive lol
Yeah, this tech like Stan mentioned is a work of systems engineering. Change one component or value and the system doesn't work. My work all along has been trying to design a VIC... someday I might get there.
You are so very right... remember stan said. The real trick is to answer the right question. Here it is... How do you get water to behave as a dielectric not a conductor. So you start there then design the cavity that's resonant with that frequency then wrap your coils. The Vic has a unique design you must understand. I'm currently on hold by the almighty. Waiting for the team father said he would provide. Do you love YHVH? Has the almighty given this a s a work set aside for you since before the foundation of the world? This is a monumental task no one man can handle... this tech is for a time of trouble, Jacob's trouble, I know most of you have been taught that you will be gone before anything happens! We will be here to the end the last trump. And the end shall come as a flood.... help me YHVH 14 years now two since understanding where is my team.
Hi Brad Thanks for sharing all those videos especially the ones on stane and his work. You must have put a lot of time and effort into your research . Your work is very clear and well produced A friend gave me a copy of stans memos a few years back I read it a couple of times before I could make any sense of it . I believe Stan is telling the truth. I have been trying a few things myself maybe you could help me on a couple of points That are confusing. Stans vic coil assembly figure 6-1 Shows a laminated strait core with the resonant coils surrounded by the primary which is then surrounded by the secondary. That seems to make sence if the choke coils are bifilar flat and alternately placed positive negative producing a bank of capacitors it doesn’t seem to show that in his schematic wiring diagrams but how else could it work ? Aney advice would bee greatly appreciated Thanks Brad A bit confused Brian From down under .
Thanks for the kind remarks. As far as replication goes I wouldn't even waste the time on the fig 6-1 VIC simply because we don't have any actual values from it. What most people are replicating (and what i'm showing in this video) is the 5coil VIC that has a feedback coil on it although I haven't added the feedback coil to mine. The specs are all over the internet as well as the drive circuit. It's going to give you the greatest chance of success. Alot of people haven't realized yet but there are parts of the circuit which are not obvious and of they are not correct it will never work. For this reason the best thing to do is replicate as close as possible to Stan's designs. Also, even when the values are correct setting up the initial operating conditions is a major challenge.
Remove electrons and switch off the bond. The Voltage Polarisation Process... When the gas processor ionises the air to remove electrons. This air is mixed with water to make water fuel. When this water fuel is ionised. The processed air with missing electrons gives the oxygen a very strong electron gravity and is used to remove electrons from the water molecule. Causing a polarity flip and so splitting the molecule.. It’s a triggering process! He said, This is the voltage polarisation of the water molecule.. The covalent bond is equal to the two shared electrons and if you remove these electrons. The oxygen atom will flip back to a positive charge instantly repelling the atoms.. Processing the air in his air gas processor he removes up to 4 electrons from the oxygen in air and uses this as a tool by dissolving the processed air into the water in the way air is dissolved to keep fish alive in a fish tank.. This is what he called his water fuel.. If you don't make the water fuel first then all of his inventions will not work as described.. I hope this is helpful to you..
Could you do a video explaining the materials needed and the process of how his car worked? I'm researching a lot about him with a end goal to make my truck run on hydrogen. It seems though he had many steps in his process and it gets very confusing.
If you search online for Stan Meyer VIC specs you'll find them (pri coil was 41.8mH 10.5 ohms, sec coil was 1.047H and 72.4 ohms, L1 choke was 1.262H and 76.7 ohms, L2 choke was 1.138H and70.1 ohms). Look for the pictures taken by Don Gabel- in the pictures he wrote down the specs. All coils were wound using double build 29AWG wire. The bobbins can be 3d printed, files are on thingiverse. If you don't have access to a 3d printer cosmocorp makes bobbins that are nearly equivalent, pn 1613-0 if I remember correctly. Finding the right core is the hard part. UY1650, or the cores I mention in this video seem to be best so far, unless you have the $ to make custom ones identical to Stan's. The problem with having them identical to Stan's is that they are thin and will break easily. I had them years ago and never had any luck with them... and then they cracked in the corners.
Hi Also I find it interesting that I appears many people do not seem to build the feedback coil even though Ronnie uses the Z value in all his calculations including the turns calculations.
Did he use the feedback coil in part of the VIC calculations? Not sure why if that's the case? Perhaps I am missing something. Either way I am planning a future video where I will show all the math that he shared years ago, but then explain what is missing and why the missing math explains that a near perfect replication of the core is necessary to achieve a successful replication.
@@BradKwfc reading this stuff constantly day and night 18 hrs some time we have to do that it is like reading a mind veyr diffult , so i found that though it would help, check the forum there is more conversation on it i feel there are several ways to balance out that if the case All the Best Dan
has anyone made a vic that makes the volts spike as predicted by Stan thereby forcing the electrons to flow through the cell and not burn out the diodes trying to return to positive when the mosfet is off ?? the cell probably has to be perfectly tuned to it's resonant frequency for the "ping"
Have you been able to recreate the apparatus from the video of Stanley demonstrating how just a half amp of electricity running through his device (which was the large clear tube with metal rods and an outlet on the top) can produce enough energy to make a flame that can cut through metal?
Are you talking about the cores? The whole point is to replicate as close to Stan's as possible. As far as we know he used a Ferrite core with a ui of 2000 and an AL value of around 106-108. Ferrite 77 is mostl likely the material he used on the VIC that he used for his 10 cell unit.
Hang the pipes at the nodes like you would wind chimes and then you wont dampen the vibration and it should work. You can't vibrate the pipes at radio frequency if they are not hung at the nodes. It's no different than a xylophone key if you don't hang it at the nodes it wont vibrate at all and you end up using a lot of brute force... your xylophone key wont work. Think of sound , vibration and feedback. If they are hung at the nodes then no brute force is needed.. a simple tone keeps it going non stop. There are much easier ways to get a trillion volts with no moving parts, no magnet or coil or battery is needed... using 2 piezoelectric speakers made of granite and a 500 lb xylophone key used as a microphone... the feedback keeps it running forever.. and it will split the air and make it's own water. A CNC machine would be required to cut the 2 disks. The 4 inch spark gap inside the device provides the radio frequency to split the water that condenses in the tweeter cup... and it goes boom right back into the microphone in an endless feedback loop. The bouncing up and down of the xylophone key resting on the 2 disks amplifies the force on the disks 829:1 giving over 400,000 lbs of force on the disks. It's like a piezoelectric lighter on steroids that will never turn off and you never have to click it constantly. 500 lbs of force on a quartz crystal releases 12,500 volts per cubic centimeter.. in granite it's about 4000 volts per cubic centimeter..... with 2 x 12 inch disks you end up with a trillion volts per disk and 100,000 volts arc's inside giving it steady radio frequency that keeps splitting the water droplets spinning over the speakers. Speakers made of granite have a range of below 1 hertz all the way to 20 megahertz.. and because they are transducers they are both microphones and speakers... they will pick up every wave for up to an 800 mile radius around it and feed it back to the microphone in an endless feedback loop. Free energy is so simple.. powered by a 500 lb microphone.. powered by "The Philosophers Stone".. which was a xylophone key. It's all done with sound and feedback.. and the steady sound is already there but you can't hear it because it's radio waves... but if you have an old cathode ray TV you can see the white noise radio waves on the screen when the station goes off the air. Your just using a vibration that is already there and feeding it back into the microphone for endless feedback to keep the disks vibrating forever. That 500lb xylophone key will bounce up and down forever on the speakers because the speakers are feeding it constant vibrations.... so simple man!... but you have to mount it at the nodes or it wont work at all. There is no specific frequency to split water... the frequency of each water droplet is determined by it's size and shape and so when your using a speaker that can reach 20 megahertz you don't have to worry about tuning to a specific frequency to split the water droplets because they are all different frequencies because they are all different sizes. It only takes a tone to vibrate the largest blocks... if you took a 1000 lb stone and tuned it to 45 hertz and hung it on the ground at the nodes it would only take a steady tone of 45 hertz to make that stone bounce up and down to cause an earthquake.... it only takes a steady tone to get all the free energy you want! If you had a stone and you didn't tune it and you don't know it's frequency then you would use a wireless microphone and give the stone an interview.. it's resonant vibration will get picked up by the microphone and feed it to the amp and speakers and broadcast it's vibration.... causing it to vibrate.
Cool. Nice to know #1 gour still kicking! #2 you are healthy, without health you have nothing, #3 you are sharing as you go along. I have not bought cores yet or wound spools. Have wire, but you previously had a different core. You decided to go with this core because?
These cores have a lower AL value than all the others I've tried plus a much larger winding window. So, these cores give me much closer inductance values for the same amount of turns and resistance than Stan had in his VIC.
Ok. I will have to build a core and spools. I have a cell built. I got a scope 4 channels now I have a board from R. Need to order parts for it. Where did you get your cores and corner pieces? Greenenergytech2013 at gmail dot com if you care to point me in some directions for materials.
@@BradKwfc if you printed the spools I would buy them too. I was trying to follow Ronnie Walker in the past but he has been quiet for a long time now. Not sure what happened
I love that power supply!! I am starting a business that is restoring old factory race cars starting with a Porsche 914 Gt6 Factory race car clone that I found in a mud field here in Pa. The main business that should pay the bills is a high voltage,high frequency Welding research. I believe that you would be very interested in the hobby side of the welding business. I will get in touch via email. I will tell you about everything then...
Link in description. You'll probably have to file the ferrite rods as they are not made to any decent standards, some will have a larger dia than others.
Hi BradK. How many liters of HHO gas per minute? And how many watts of electrical energy? How many watts of heat energy is produced by the combustion of HHO gas? You need to heat the water with HHO gas to get calories. 1g * 1 degree Celsius = 1 calorie 1 calorie = 0.001163 watts * hour. Wat electrical energy
I haven't taken any measurements. I haven't been able to produce the reaction. IMO there are initial requirements that must be met in order for the process to work and I haven't figured out how to get them going. I can find resonance easily but there's much more to it than just resonance.
@@BradKwfc Maybe you help. czcams.com/video/SzKyOhdRVjo/video.html czcams.com/video/s-m1XyMWpx4/video.html czcams.com/video/ogH33OTJ3lw/video.html Frequency is the resonance of water. HERE MILIAPERS, NOT AMPERS? :)
@@BradKwfc It is better to count in calories than in Joules. A calorie is heated by: (the Junkers calorimeter czcams.com/video/HeofLEQ6wuA/video.html) - you can heat a bucket of water 1 gram of water(g) * 1 degree Celsius (℃)= 1 calorie; Сalories to watts 1 calorie = 0.001163 watts * hour. Δt℃=t2℃ - t1℃; t1℃ - initial water temperature; t2℃ - final water temperature (burning HHO gas you need to heat water); Δt℃=90℃ - 20℃=70℃; - example М(g) gram of water * Δt℃ = calorie 10 000 gram of water * Δ70 degrees Celsius(℃) = 700 000calorie=700 000 calorie * 0.001163 watts * hour = 814,1 watts * hour - thermal energy. P=U(Volts)*I(Ampere)*hour= Wat*hour - electrical energy. P=12Volts*20Ampere*1hour=240 Wat*hour - example Coefficient of useful action: (Wat thermal energy/ Wat electrical energy) *100% = (814,1 watts * hour / 240 Wat*hour) *100% = 339,2% - example Тhat is more or less? Wat electrical energy? >
The variable pulse amplitude is what you will want as it is what will allow you to set the base voltage to keep the water polarized while pulsing the higher voltage later.
Have you been working with Ronnie or reading all his old posts? That's exactly why I have changed all my designs over the years-to try and get them closer to what he was doing.
Never a better time!! looking good. Nice setup you made with the battery. ~Russ
Thanks Russ. Some day we'll get this figured out. Glad to see your still interested in S.M. tech.
Hey, you mentioned a guy in nz, Adam... how can I get in contact with him please..
Stan Meyer's goal was to produce Hydrogen from water while using a minimum amount of amperage. Therefore, an important key improvement in Bradk's project is to use a step down transformer, stepping down the voltage from the primary to the secondary and at the same time stepping up the amperage to the secondary side of the transformer at the same time. This step-up of output amperage will deliver more amperage to the tank-circuit and help to achieve the amperage limit needed to the electrolyte ,water, in the 10 Stan Meyer capacitors, hence achieving the catastrophic breakdown of water desired. The key is to change the windings in the primary side of the transformer to be different from the windings in the secondary in order to produce a step up in output amperage to the tank circuit.
What I think is going on with Stan Meyer's patents are; the wording of the patents was only written to protect his inventions from theft while keeping as much information secret as possible. I think the key to understanding Stan Meyers circuit is the Tank Circuit where the water has replaced the conventional dielectric, as compared to what is used in normal capacitors. The secondary side of the transformer circuit's blocking diode is for allowing the tank circuit amperage build up to charge until the amperage in the capacitors reaches a limit where there is a catastrophic destruction of the electrolyte water, where by the water is broken down into gas. If someone used this circuit with a standard capacitor the Capacitor would explode. Maybe the answer can be found by finding a way to adjust/increase the amperage inside the Stan Meyer capacitors. There are so many variables like the uf, size, composition, and shape of the capacitors. Maybe the Farads of the Stan Meyer capacitors is the key. Others have reproduced Stan's work so the time is worth it, reinvent the wheel and learn a lot.
Very Neat thank you for raising the tidiness up on the build very nice
It's a cold fusion reactor not electrolysis people get that mixed up
nice use of AM radio ferrite rods
Thanks. Their cheap too and give much closer values (without gapping) than any other core I've tried.
im waiting dude
I know the feeling....If there's one thing all this work reveals its that it is much more complex and difficult to reproduce than we initially thought.
looking good were all in the same boat I just got done in my lab Been working wile I can. Also Nice to here someone realize if you change anything it wont work as many cant grasp that lol Nice work and good to see your alive lol
Yeah, this tech like Stan mentioned is a work of systems engineering. Change one component or value and the system doesn't work. My work all along has been trying to design a VIC... someday I might get there.
You are so very right... remember stan said. The real trick is to answer the right question. Here it is... How do you get water to behave as a dielectric not a conductor. So you start there then design the cavity that's resonant with that frequency then wrap your coils. The Vic has a unique design you must understand. I'm currently on hold by the almighty. Waiting for the team father said he would provide. Do you love YHVH? Has the almighty given this a s a work set aside for you since before the foundation of the world? This is a monumental task no one man can handle... this tech is for a time of trouble, Jacob's trouble,
I know most of you have been taught that you will be gone before anything happens! We will be here to the end the last trump. And the end shall come as a flood.... help me YHVH 14 years now two since understanding where is my team.
I changed the batteries in my TV remote last week. 🙃
How the hell do you know all this stuff? I’m beyond impressed! (This is Llam, by the way.)
Haha thanks. Years and years of research.
Hi Brad
Thanks for sharing all those videos especially the ones on stane and his work.
You must have put a lot of time and effort into your research .
Your work is very clear and well produced
A friend gave me a copy of stans memos a few years back I read it a couple of times before I could make any sense of it . I believe Stan is telling the truth.
I have been trying a few things myself maybe you could help me on a couple of points
That are confusing.
Stans vic coil assembly figure 6-1
Shows a laminated strait core with the resonant coils surrounded by the primary which is then surrounded by the secondary.
That seems to make sence if the choke coils are bifilar flat and alternately placed positive negative producing a bank of capacitors it doesn’t seem to show that in his schematic wiring diagrams but how else could it work ?
Aney advice would bee greatly appreciated
Thanks Brad
A bit confused Brian
From down under .
Thanks for the kind remarks.
As far as replication goes I wouldn't even waste the time on the fig 6-1 VIC simply because we don't have any actual values from it.
What most people are replicating (and what i'm showing in this video) is the 5coil VIC that has a feedback coil on it although I haven't added the feedback coil to mine. The specs are all over the internet as well as the drive circuit.
It's going to give you the greatest chance of success. Alot of people haven't realized yet but there are parts of the circuit which are not obvious and of they are not correct it will never work. For this reason the best thing to do is replicate as close as possible to Stan's designs. Also, even when the values are correct setting up the initial operating conditions is a major challenge.
Remove electrons and switch off the bond. The Voltage Polarisation Process...
When the gas processor ionises the air to remove electrons. This air is mixed with water to make water fuel. When this water fuel is ionised. The processed air with missing electrons gives the oxygen a very strong electron gravity and is used to remove electrons from the water molecule. Causing a polarity flip and so splitting the molecule.. It’s a triggering process! He said, This is the voltage polarisation of the water molecule.. The covalent bond is equal to the two shared electrons and if you remove these electrons. The oxygen atom will flip back to a positive charge instantly repelling the atoms.. Processing the air in his air gas processor he removes up to 4 electrons from the oxygen in air and uses this as a tool by dissolving the processed air into the water in the way air is dissolved to keep fish alive in a fish tank.. This is what he called his water fuel.. If you don't make the water fuel first then all of his inventions will not work as described.. I hope this is helpful to you..
Could you do a video explaining the materials needed and the process of how his car worked? I'm researching a lot about him with a end goal to make my truck run on hydrogen. It seems though he had many steps in his process and it gets very confusing.
Hello there!! There's a chance to get some info of your VIC style transformer so i can build one? Thank you!!!
If you search online for Stan Meyer VIC specs you'll find them (pri coil was 41.8mH 10.5 ohms, sec coil was 1.047H and 72.4 ohms, L1 choke was 1.262H and 76.7 ohms, L2 choke was 1.138H and70.1 ohms). Look for the pictures taken by Don Gabel- in the pictures he wrote down the specs. All coils were wound using double build 29AWG wire. The bobbins can be 3d printed, files are on thingiverse. If you don't have access to a 3d printer cosmocorp makes bobbins that are nearly equivalent, pn 1613-0 if I remember correctly. Finding the right core is the hard part. UY1650, or the cores I mention in this video seem to be best so far, unless you have the $ to make custom ones identical to Stan's. The problem with having them identical to Stan's is that they are thin and will break easily. I had them years ago and never had any luck with them... and then they cracked in the corners.
@@BradKwfc Thank you!!!
Hi
Also I find it interesting that I appears many people do not seem to build the feedback coil
even though Ronnie uses the Z value in all his calculations including the turns calculations.
Did he use the feedback coil in part of the VIC calculations? Not sure why if that's the case?
Perhaps I am missing something.
Either way I am planning a future video where I will show all the math that he shared years ago, but then explain what is missing and why the missing math explains that a near perfect replication of the core is necessary to achieve a successful replication.
@@BradKwfc reading this stuff constantly day and night 18 hrs some time we have to do that it is like reading a mind veyr diffult , so i found that though it would help, check the forum there is more conversation on it i feel there are several ways to balance out that if the case All the Best Dan
Hola. Tienes los diagramas del circuito?
has anyone made a vic that makes the volts spike as predicted by Stan thereby forcing the electrons to flow through the cell and not burn out the diodes trying to return to positive when the mosfet is off ?? the cell probably has to be perfectly tuned to it's resonant frequency for the "ping"
I only know one person that has done it. Haven't talked to him for a long time though.
Have you been able to recreate the apparatus from the video of Stanley demonstrating how just a half amp of electricity running through his device (which was the large clear tube with metal rods and an outlet on the top) can produce enough energy to make a flame that can cut through metal?
Some people have. Most of us are working on replicating a later device of his which he used to run his car on.
correct me if am wrong wouldnt the nanocrystal be better or the metaglass ?
Are you talking about the cores? The whole point is to replicate as close to Stan's as possible. As far as we know he used a Ferrite core with a ui of 2000 and an AL value of around 106-108. Ferrite 77 is mostl likely the material he used on the VIC that he used for his 10 cell unit.
Hang the pipes at the nodes like you would wind chimes and then you wont dampen the vibration and it should work. You can't vibrate the pipes at radio frequency if they are not hung at the nodes. It's no different than a xylophone key if you don't hang it at the nodes it wont vibrate at all and you end up using a lot of brute force... your xylophone key wont work. Think of sound , vibration and feedback. If they are hung at the nodes then no brute force is needed.. a simple tone keeps it going non stop.
There are much easier ways to get a trillion volts with no moving parts, no magnet or coil or battery is needed... using 2 piezoelectric speakers made of granite and a 500 lb xylophone key used as a microphone... the feedback keeps it running forever.. and it will split the air and make it's own water. A CNC machine would be required to cut the 2 disks. The 4 inch spark gap inside the device provides the radio frequency to split the water that condenses in the tweeter cup... and it goes boom right back into the microphone in an endless feedback loop. The bouncing up and down of the xylophone key resting on the 2 disks amplifies the force on the disks 829:1 giving over 400,000 lbs of force on the disks. It's like a piezoelectric lighter on steroids that will never turn off and you never have to click it constantly. 500 lbs of force on a quartz crystal releases 12,500 volts per cubic centimeter.. in granite it's about 4000 volts per cubic centimeter..... with 2 x 12 inch disks you end up with a trillion volts per disk and 100,000 volts arc's inside giving it steady radio frequency that keeps splitting the water droplets spinning over the speakers. Speakers made of granite have a range of below 1 hertz all the way to 20 megahertz.. and because they are transducers they are both microphones and speakers... they will pick up every wave for up to an 800 mile radius around it and feed it back to the microphone in an endless feedback loop.
Free energy is so simple.. powered by a 500 lb microphone.. powered by "The Philosophers Stone".. which was a xylophone key.
It's all done with sound and feedback.. and the steady sound is already there but you can't hear it because it's radio waves... but if you have an old cathode ray TV you can see the white noise radio waves on the screen when the station goes off the air. Your just using a vibration that is already there and feeding it back into the microphone for endless feedback to keep the disks vibrating forever. That 500lb xylophone key will bounce up and down forever on the speakers because the speakers are feeding it constant vibrations.... so simple man!... but you have to mount it at the nodes or it wont work at all.
There is no specific frequency to split water... the frequency of each water droplet is determined by it's size and shape and so when your using a speaker that can reach 20 megahertz you don't have to worry about tuning to a specific frequency to split the water droplets because they are all different frequencies because they are all different sizes.
It only takes a tone to vibrate the largest blocks... if you took a 1000 lb stone and tuned it to 45 hertz and hung it on the ground at the nodes it would only take a steady tone of 45 hertz to make that stone bounce up and down to cause an earthquake.... it only takes a steady tone to get all the free energy you want! If you had a stone and you didn't tune it and you don't know it's frequency then you would use a wireless microphone and give the stone an interview.. it's resonant vibration will get picked up by the microphone and feed it to the amp and speakers and broadcast it's vibration.... causing it to vibrate.
There is no math for this level of dimensional flux distortion.
There is but its a long process of discovery. I'm sure others have worked it out, I'm still working on it.
Cool. Nice to know #1 gour still kicking! #2 you are healthy, without health you have nothing, #3 you are sharing as you go along. I have not bought cores yet or wound spools. Have wire, but you previously had a different core. You decided to go with this core because?
These cores have a lower AL value than all the others I've tried plus a much larger winding window. So, these cores give me much closer inductance values for the same amount of turns and resistance than Stan had in his VIC.
Ok. I will have to build a core and spools. I have a cell built. I got a scope 4 channels now I have a board from R. Need to order parts for it. Where did you get your cores and corner pieces?
Greenenergytech2013 at gmail dot com if you care to point me in some directions for materials.
Bought the cores on ebay. Made the corner pieces on my 3d printer. Let me know if you want I'll upload the files if not I could send some to you.
@@BradKwfc let me know how much. I can e transfer you the money?
@@BradKwfc if you printed the spools I would buy them too. I was trying to follow Ronnie Walker in the past but he has been quiet for a long time now. Not sure what happened
I love that power supply!! I am starting a business that is restoring old factory race cars starting with a Porsche 914 Gt6 Factory race car clone that I found in a mud field here in Pa. The main business that should pay the bills is a high voltage,high frequency Welding research. I believe that you would be very interested in the hobby side of the welding business. I will get in touch via email. I will tell you about everything then...
Very nice can you share your STL and diagram to replicate it
Link in description. You'll probably have to file the ferrite rods as they are not made to any decent standards, some will have a larger dia than others.
@@BradKwfc i was talking about the STL of the cell which produce the HHO , is it printed as well ?
Looks clean :D I see, why a 3D printer can help in every aspects, one with a 3D printer is one step closer to a "god" haha ;P
Fill up with tapwater and go...
I wish it was that easy.
Hi BradK. How many liters of HHO gas per minute? And how many watts of electrical energy? How many watts of heat energy is produced by the combustion of HHO gas? You need to heat the water with HHO gas to get calories. 1g * 1 degree Celsius = 1 calorie 1 calorie = 0.001163 watts * hour. Wat electrical energy
I haven't taken any measurements. I haven't been able to produce the reaction. IMO there are initial requirements that must be met in order for the process to work and I haven't figured out how to get them going. I can find resonance easily but there's much more to it than just resonance.
@@BradKwfc
Maybe you help.
czcams.com/video/SzKyOhdRVjo/video.html
czcams.com/video/s-m1XyMWpx4/video.html
czcams.com/video/ogH33OTJ3lw/video.html
Frequency is the resonance of water. HERE MILIAPERS, NOT AMPERS? :)
@@BradKwfc
It is better to count in calories than in Joules. A calorie is heated by:
(the Junkers calorimeter czcams.com/video/HeofLEQ6wuA/video.html) - you can heat a bucket of water
1 gram of water(g) * 1 degree Celsius
(℃)= 1 calorie;
Сalories to watts 1 calorie = 0.001163 watts * hour.
Δt℃=t2℃ - t1℃;
t1℃ -
initial water temperature; t2℃
-
final water temperature (burning HHO gas you need to heat water);
Δt℃=90℃ - 20℃=70℃; - example
М(g) gram of water * Δt℃ = calorie
10 000 gram of water * Δ70 degrees Celsius(℃) = 700 000calorie=700 000 calorie * 0.001163 watts * hour = 814,1 watts * hour - thermal energy.
P=U(Volts)*I(Ampere)*hour= Wat*hour - electrical energy.
P=12Volts*20Ampere*1hour=240 Wat*hour - example
Coefficient of useful action: (Wat thermal energy/ Wat electrical energy) *100% = (814,1 watts * hour / 240 Wat*hour) *100% = 339,2% - example
Тhat is more or less? Wat electrical energy? >
Maybe you help.
How to make a VIC transformer czcams.com/video/Bw4ADWjDt60/video.html
www.globalkast.com/