Stanley Meyer's Electron Extraction Device
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 03. 2018
- Special thanks to Edgar Wilhelm for sending me his drawing of his cell.
This is my understanding of Stan Meyer's free electrons extraction circuit. I think what he wanted to do with his circuit was to discharge his water capacitor. His cell was actually a capacitor with water as dielectric material. And we know that if we charge a capacitor until a certain level or if it is fully charged, a capacitor will behave like an open circuit. That's why we will get less gas production over time if we don't discharge our electrolyzer. We can see this clearly if we use high resistant dielectric material like distilled water.
Donation:
paypal.me/okkimoeljadi
My fullname as on my id card: Joko Ari Moelyo Okki
/ okkimoeljadi
My email address is: info@m-opensolutions.com
Instagram: / okkimoeljadi - Věda a technologie
The information below is derived from the work of genius twin brothers Stanley and Stephen Meyer.Many years of study,reading 42 patents and endless hours of Meyer lectures, documentaries and radio shows gives me the chance to show the heart of their research.
If you want to run your car on water then this is a viable and realistic set of stages to go through to achieve such a goal..
First you must ask yourself why has it not been done in this day and age..A car combustion system that can access the large amount of energy available in electrolysis gas from water.
It is commonly known as Faraday electrolysis. It has high mass conversion losses. Mainly heat.This process alone is a poor option as an engine will not produce enough electricity output to power an electrolysis unit to supply enough gas from the water to realistically cover the car engine's energy requirements..
Many have tried electrolysis gas production methods with very limited success.
So what are the steps to rethink this problem?..
Step 1
Striving for a highly efficient electrolysis cell is the first step.
Your electrolysis cell will not make enough gas to keep the engine running from the car's electrical output.But this is the first step.And the more efficient you make your cell. Be it through the physical construction or efficient driving circuit,or both
Step number 2.
As in step number one you can make gas from your electrolysis cell. This gas fuel starts as water and is converted to gas. The gas is fed into the combustion zone where the second conversion takes place..In the second conversion the gas is converted back to water,with a given amount of energy release.This is the water to gas and gas to water conversions or energy states.
Step three.
We know by now that the first conversion.Water to gas is energy intensive and has a large amount of losses.This is where many hundreds of hours have been spent by people trying endless ways to improve the efficiency of electrolysis. Without taking into account they are dealing with not one mass convention in making the gas. But two mass conventions. Water to gas and gas back to water.
This second energy conversion has been mainly overlooked by the majority of people studying in this area.
So we must take a closer look at this second conversion to see if there are any ways of improving the reaction efficiency at the point of combustion..
Step 3
Conversion factors for gas to water.
It is not well known that the conversion factors for gas to water with an amount of energy released through combustion.This only releases one millionth of the available energy that is in the gases. That is having their mass converted back to water. This is a chain reaction and is quickly shut down and reaches a stable state. The chemicals involved hydrogen and oxygen reach a stable state achieving mass conversion gas to water H2O. At this point the available mass to energy window is closed.
By converting the gas back to water..This water should be then looked on as a waste product of the combustion event..
Step 4
What could be done to reduce this waste byproduct (water).
In theory if you had a 100 percent conversion gas to explosive energy during the second conversion. You would not have any waste. All the gases would be burnt and there would be no byproduct water post combustion..
Step 5
How can this be done? How can we access this chain reaction event and improve its efficiency. If we could improve this mass conversion, just a fraction of a percent. This would vastly reduce the gas input needed. To attain the amount of energy required to run the engine..Less gas is what you will require as opposed to, insufficient gas is the problem.
Note!
Yes, correct Faraday electrolysis makes a gas that you can only access one millionth of its energy through combustion.…
Step 6
How do we look at this inefficient combustion process and make improvements?..
(Chemical reactions!)
Improving combustion to burn more of the available gases.
This step is key!
What is going on during the combustion moment?
Ignition occurs.This sets off a chain reaction that will convert the gas mass back to a liquid mass.(Water). In turn with an amount of explosive energy. As we already know the explosive energy only accounts for one millionth of the possible available energy in the gas fuel. So how do we come up with a system to access more energy from the given amount of fuel?
Step 7...Controlling the combustion event to access larger amounts of energy that are available..
This is done by controlling the combustion moment and extending the chemical reaction in a way to prolong energy release from the gas as it turns to water.
One must note.
Is a combustion engine not a pump. It creates a vacuum at the input manifold and creates a positive pressure at the exhaust manifold.
Hydrogen and oxygen from water is the perfect fuel.Two parts Hydrogen to one part Oxygen.This is the perfect fuel to oxidiser ratio needing no other elements for combustion just fuel with oxidizer. To achieve control of the combustion event you have to control and minimise contamination from other elements. As said above hydrogen and oxygen is the perfect fuel to oxidiser mix.
Something that is mostly unknown about is.The combustion engine can be fueled with hydrogen and oxygen and have the intake manifold completely sealed off. This creates a permanent vacuum in the intake manifold. With the hydrogen and oxygen being delivered into the engine manifold vacuum. An engine like this can be seen in demonstrations online videos..
So now we have hydrogen and oxygen and no other gases at the combustion event.This makes control of the event less complex.
Step 8
How do we make a tool to act upon this simple chain reaction?
Now we get into atoms and molecules.
Is it not true an oxygen atom is 16 times the size of a hydrogen atom. In turn having 16 times the attraction force over an electron than the hydrogen atom. This my friends is your tool to affect the combustion event.
Question is ?
Can we prepare and add oxygen atoms in such a way to the combustion event to improve energy release by way of extending the chain reaction.
Yes this can be done. First you have to have a way to remove electrons from the Oxygen Atom.
Oxygen can be held in a stable state with up to 4 missing electrons by adding the correct light wavelength energy. Removing the electrons can be achieved with the use of a low pressure plasma reactor.
A low pressure plasma reactor will act upon ambient air gases,oxygen,nitrogen,etc. In such a way to bring the constituents of air to what is called chemical resonance.Chemical resonance is a highly charged state whereby elements stop holding on to their electrons and electron sharing occurs. If you can take ambient air gases to chemical resonance. You are halfway to removing electrons from the oxygen atom.
Step 9.Removing electrons from oxygen during chemical resonance.
A plasma reactor consists of two stainless steel electrodes and quartz glass tube. The anode is positioned on the outside of the quartz. And the cathode is inside with a 1mm gap from the quartz. This gap is where the gases are worked upon. In the low pressure plasma zone.
When in use this reactor has an amount of capacitance this is including the charged gases being held at chemical resonance.The gases become part of the reactor circuit capacitance.This capacitance could be considered to be like a single cell of a battery. It takes on capacitance and in turn can be discharged when the power input has stopped. When discharging the reactor's capacitance it is possible to reduce the mass of the plasma excited gases by way of discharging the reactor to a resistive load..
When reactor discharge is engaged the mass of the gases are reduced through a loss of electrons. Oxygen with up to four missing electrons is produced. These gases can be held in a stable state by way of red 660nM light. The low pressure is maintained in the reactor by the engine intake manifold vacuum. It is connected directly to the sealed off intake manifold.
Step 10
How does mass reduced Oxygen atoms extend the opening of the chain reaction window during combustion.
Well remember that the big oxygen atom has 16 times the attraction force compared to the Hydrogen Atom. This is where the Oxygen does work for you. When these processed Oxygen Atoms are added to electrolysis gases Hydrogen and Oxygen during the combustion window. They have such a large attraction force they will overcome the Hydrogens ability to hold on to its electron. And in so forces the Hydrogen to give up its mass to energy. This interaction during the combustion chain reaction causes more mass to be converted and opens the chain reaction window giving access to more than one millionth of the available gas energy. This in turn reduces the amount of byproduct,water in the exhaust..
By adjusting the mixture of fuel and processed gases. Mass reduced Oxygen.
You can now vary not just the gas fuel input. But you can vary the amount of explosive energy per unit of gas fuel.
Stanley Meyer used this method and perfected this fuel gas mix. He reduced the amount of electrolysis gas needed to very small amounts.The water fuel injector was the pinnacle of his achievement regarding using water as fuel.
God rest his soul, poisoned in 1998
What role does the quartz tube play in the process?
Didn't read all that but i agree with you
Years ago when I was designing my cell(s), I stuffed my intake manifold with foam & drove my truck without a hitch to my friends house. He couldn't believe it. He said, "How are you doing that with the engine being a pump~!"
If I'm not mistaken, the milage I was getting without the generator was around 200 - 220 miles per tank. With the generator was 400 miles per tank.
The only problem I had with my cell(s) was they'd only last about a month. 1 electrode wore thin. My design didn't have big steel plate, or pipe. It was made from 16g ss wire.
I doubt I'm the first person to suggest this, but the secret that stan Meyers took to his grave might have been phase cancelation? or some specific frequencies? the Pythagorean circle of fifths? Fibonacci sequence frequencies? please someone who has all the right equipment please bring this great invention back to life! It can't be that hard to work out what he was doing, could it?
frequency harmonics. he used more than one frequency.
@@dominiklackner6334 One vic one frequency?
Thank you Okki for showing us. The third top electrode should be stainless steel mesh like the bottom one and larger. This top third electrode, becomes also a gas producing electrode. The volt meter to measure the relisted charge should have lights to burn up the free electrons. Your power input volt meter will show the extra v/a the cell is using now wen the light bulbs are burning. This third large top electrode diamond shape rolled up construct is now a stronger producer of gas then the bottom one. LOL.Edgar
You are welcome Edgar. This is just my observation from my research up to now. If I find another effect I will let you know. At this moment I think that water (with no added electrolyte) has high electrical resistance and Stan Meyer tried to remove this charge from his cell in order to maintain gas production. In his late patents he omitted this third electrode and just connect both electrodes with a current consuming device (light bulb filament) alternatively with the VIC (capacitor charger). Of course maybe I'm wrong, I will continue to observe this.
If you put stainless steel screens or spiral pancake coils with plastic window sceen between them you can extract voltage from the rising bubbles and if your bubbles have a tall tube to rise in more screens can be stacked to increase the voltage
The liquid is a resistor and the rising bubbles are voltage nodes trying to equalize there voltage potentials through the conductivity of the liquid
I was at the Meyers estate
With all these electronic experts here, I think it'd be interesting to see what someone could come up with for my cell design. I personally don't think it has to be so complex.
Where are coils and pulse generator?
Gracias muy instructivo
Pour quoi le voltmeter est installer en serie?
Send a square wave at 20,000 hz to the stainless tubes with 1mm gap between them, at 12v, 2 amps, the water splits into H and O without the need for chemicals or high voltage.....vary the width of the pulses to achieve resonance, and increase the output of gas.......
Ok, show me that...it's just your theory.
What do you use to send the wave with? Pwm?
@@off-gridhillbillystyle3735 dude Don't be naive, it's not that simple. Guy doesn't know what he is talking about. When you split water you get two H and one O.... Pwm can't create 20khz signal, you need signal generator, bifilar inductor, n channel mosfet.... Just Google " mosfet switch frequency to coil".... But you won't get anything from that, only you can burn you transistor from back EMF.
@@hardcoreplayafromthehimala4888 cool!! So where's your build ? Can you upload it?
I don't share anything on youtube, i'm on this topic some time, and i know what work and what do not work. Guy said 12v ha ha....high voltage in clean water is a must.
MIssing a PWM - Meyers had developed a specific frequency that breaks covalent bonds. Without the PWM you're just running a brute force system.
If you're cell design can produce it's own resonance, you may not need a pwm.
Hi Okki. Good experiment.
When you put a load on it.
A bulb in series in the extraction circuit, how much more current does it draw, compared to no bulb.
Do you know what I mean ?
I am looking forward for your next experiment, thanks.
Hi Mike, thanks. If you want to see how much current we can draw from Stan Meyer's "Electron Extraction Device", please see my previous video here: czcams.com/video/Utbyo4qAxao/video.html
Unfortunately I never saw any extra current (or free-energy) on all of my systems. I would like to know how I can achieve that.
Okki Moeljadi Good question, Okki.
Thanks for your support Mike. Yes, I do this research privately at home.
Very simple explanation. Are you getting any closer to find out how Stan Meyer did it??
Thank you! No, I still don't have time to continue this research.
I'm no expert on Stan's cell but just a couple of things to point out the inner ring should be magnesium on each cylinder and your out put would be much higher by wiring them individually
Amigo interesante ese tercer electrodo mas delgado que le colocas , .tienes videos mas nuevos sobre este tema ?
Te agradezco.
Thanks so much my friend
I don't have a new video regarding this. At the moment I don't have time to do that.
i from Brisbane too Edgar
Why dont the other tubes work?
Think you are right about discharging the "cap", that has been my thoughts for awhile now too. But this can be also done by shorting the plates too in between pulsing time. With his VIC circuit though, my thoughts were that this "electron extraction circuit" was more to discharge the cell before any dangerous static charges could build up possibly causing the cell to detonate.
But maybe not just from the "VIC", just found this:
"When liquid is passed through thin tubing at a high flowrate, the electrostatic charge of the flowing matter generates static electricity (flow electrification). (The charge level is higher for poorly conductive solvents flowing through plastic tubes. In addition, large amounts of air bubbles flowing through the tube can amplify the static electricity."
"If electrostatically charged liquid accumulates in an electrically insulated container, the amount of charge gradually increases to a point where it can easily generate high voltages, on the order of several kV."
"If an electrical conductor comes within a certain distance of the container, an electrical discharge occurs, which releases thermal energy."
www.shimadzu.com/an/hplc/support/lib/lctalk/14/14lab.html
Also look at the "xogen" patent. That was done by Stan's brother-in-law up in Canada after Stan's death. In that, they show a pulsed stainless steel coil at the top of the cell that they say is part of the gas conversion. But the SS coil could be just an electrode in disguise (to protect patent) and the electrode could be pulse discharged as an improved "electron extraction" technique. Though when they demonstrated it, this partwas inline with the gas, and not in the cell:
look at figures 6-8:
patents.google.com/patent/US6126794
Xogen demo video:
czcams.com/video/pXo7CVFI5Sk/video.html
Hi Davy, yes, that is exactly what Stan was doing. In his later patents he "shorted" the electrodes between the charging pulses. He disguised this step by putting "Current Consuming Device" between them.
I'm now starting to think, after looking at the xogen patent and their demo unit again, extracting electrons from the GAS (and not the cell) maybe the major key to slowing the burn of the gas to something more usable.
I'll share somethings I just came across that would help support that:
"Joseph John Thomson is widely recognized as the discoverer of the electron.Thomson worked on various aspects of the conduction of electricity through gases. In 1897 he reported that "cathode rays" were actually negatively charged particles in motion; he argued that the charged particles weighed much less than the lightest atom and were in fact constituents of atoms [Thomson 1897a, 1897b]. In 1899, he measured the charge of the particles, and speculated on how they were assembled into atoms"
"Thomson scattering is an important phenomenon in plasma physics and was first explained by the physicist J. J. Thomson. As long as the motion of the particle is non-relativistic (i.e. its speed is much less than the speed of light), the main cause of the acceleration of the particle will be due to the electric field component of the incident wave. In a first approximation, the influence of the magnetic field can be neglected. The particle will move in the direction of the oscillating electric field, resulting in electromagnetic dipole radiation. The moving particle radiates most strongly in a direction perpendicular to its acceleration and that radiation will be polarized along the direction of its motion."
This falls right in line with how Stan would have progressed to the gas core transformer(a charged particle accelerator) after this "electron extraction circuit" was figured out
Big like 👍 👍 👍
Hello, ökki
I have made some experiments with the Stanley Meyer tecnic and reading most of his patents, although i could not reproduce his resonant watersplitter.I only got the result of common electrolysis with or without adition of electrolytes.I think the extra electrons can only be detected if the high voltage watersplitting is used and requires blocking of the currentflow by insulating coating of the electrodes or by resonant circuit means.It would be great if you could achive it,Good luck.
HI Wolfgang, thanks for commenting. I do this research for almost ten years now, trying many techniques including resonance driver circuits but never seen any good gas production where I can run my car engine only from HHO. What I always see is gas production depends on electric current. If you want more gas, you have to put more current into the cell.
Okki Moeljadi
Hello, yes I think it is quite tricky to get this technic tuned, although i believe that it's possible, it seems that some people has been able to reproduce it.There are some videos, but it's difficult to know if they are true.As in the patents is clearly stated that the technic used breaks up the covalent bonds of the hho molecules with strong resonant electric fields , I think in order to get the latter it is necessary use high voltage or very small gaps in order to achieve this strong dielectric fields and simultaneously inhibit currentflow.Maybe the pmasmasparks are the most similar process, which can ignit water instantaneously.May i correct you with the drawing you are showing in the video, it corresponds to the gasprocessor which is intended to energize the air in the motorintake.Greetings and thanks for sharing investigations
thats because you guys have it all wrong. its not about gas production. its about ball lightening. czcams.com/users/results?search_query=moray+king
Did you measure the current between minus and third electrode?
No, I did not.
@@OkkiMoeljadi Then measure current. In case there is a some current it can be used to power another HHO cell and so on.
@@Radovedn There's an interesting thought.
Don't you need the laser energy to extract electrons during this process?
no . the lasers are simply to ionise the water before it becomes into the system. this can be done by other methods. magnets, high voltage ect.
WFC each unit should be isolated to form a series capacitance effect.
Your extraction probe should be on the positive side. Eletrons are negatively charged and will be attracted to positive, just like the patent shows. Also, for this to fully work, you need to bring the eletrons in rhe oxygen atoma to higher orbital states. Stan did this by using LEDs AND a high voltage chamber surrounding the gas. On the top of that was the electron extraction probe.
Do you think it can work 😅
Love it thanks for helping others ie me 😁 it not a big secret but if you learn from others it's great to share info but governments don't like it stuff em bloody lumarti and that shit rockefeller
So what you are saying is when a capacitor is charged to saturation it becomes less efficient due to saturation of electrons in the dielectric and by routing these to a bulb you can eliminate the saturation and allow for electrons to flow freely but you can not close loop the 3rd electrode back into the cell due to polarity issue so you have to block electrons with a diode and trap them in the bulb turning them into heat/light basically on an external circuit. Oh wait I have more.... maybe if you had a separate cell you could use this external circuit to run it or multiple cells more efficiently and daisy chain as many as you would like. Sooo Okki you must go out and build multiple cells to test this theory and see how much gas production you can get from multiple daisy chained cells utilizing this "battery bank" style method...Ugggggg It never ends! Thanks for the vids!
Stan Meyer's cell is indeed a capacitor. You have to discharge the stored charge in the cell from time to time if you want to maintain gas production.
Okki you are correct but do you understand how he could produce enough gas to run a VW engine? I would like to hear your thoughts. I have my own theory that I will run by you. I think he was producing gas as fast as any of us can produce it with the standard frequency setup. I built a replica of his double 555 cell driver and basically I think he was trying to not only ring the cell to help produce more gas but mostly to remove as much heat from the cell. The toroidal transformer only magnified the frequencies to do this. I think the gas is so explosive and the energy it can release all at once is so high that you don't need as much as you think to make the engine run but there is another problem and that is volume. The lack of a fuel vapor in the air being sucked into the motor lessens the impact of the explosion within the cylinder. I think he was misting the intake in order to get the volume of fuel up because these explosions are enough to light the water vapor within the compression of the motor like a diesel. Moist air mostly allows for more compression and more efficient burning of fossil fuels as well. I tested this theory on a truck and found that if I ran my cell without a pwm, it would heat up and produce mist which would then allow for 3-4 mpg increase but running the pwm cooled the cell and I could never get the increase of mpg. Does this make sense to you? Just my theory that one day I hope to test.
If you pay attention to the details of Stan's videos, you will see a manometer on top his cell shows the cell pressure. Also if you see what kind of cell he uses as he drove his buggy, you can clearly see that he did not use his demo cell but another cell which is bigger, bulkier and designed to withstand very high pressure. Maybe this "high pressure" was the secret key of his system. The other parts of his system could be just there to distract our concentration. I don't know. And yes, water mist can help to reduce fuel consumption.
I noticed the massive cell he used and that he probably regulated the gas into the carb just because that's what you do with LP in order to keep things running smooth but what interests me is the fact that he uses materials that can withstand pressure and heat. My guess is he is utilizing the heat as well and have noticed lots of folks testing this idea with hho and heat exchangers with good results. Cool stuff! I'm going to build a rig I want you to see in the future but it may be a while, I'll post my vid for you to see when I get it done..I have no time right now.
@@OkkiMoeljadi Nice experiment. This reminds me of the Joe Cell in some ways. I wonder if you need to connect a vacuum to the chamber in order to draw additional gas from the "capacitor"...
Okki my friend, as you may be aware Stanley stretched the bonds before fracturing. He used voltrolysis much like Andrija Puhriarch and not typical electrolysis. This happens when there is a dielectric such as laquer applied to the one electrode.
People don't learn from past mistakes. Our heroes are murdered left and right, and then when I ask people why did we allow them kill Stanley Meyer, well over 99 percent of people say, "Stanley, who?" From Stanley Meyers patents, the Japanese companies in 2008 made cars that used water as fuel, such as Nissan Skyline family van, Honda Clarity hydrogen powered from water, by 2009 Genepax that made the water-powered car (as seen on TV) had to shut down abruptly, even their website was shut down, but just like the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs that were dropped on the Japanese people even after they had already surrendered, they had to yet teach the Japanese a lesson, not to mess with Texas, and on 3/11 they nuked Japan again by the Earthquake and tsunami, using Israeli nukes on the bottom of the ocean. Water-powered cars and other water-powered machines, including free-and clean energy devices Japan had planned on making, we're all stopped permanently. They killed our last hope of having a chance at reversing this environmental disaster they call, "global warming." They are evil, pure evil, portrayed as monsters who have kept us asleep in the movie, "Dark City," and ugly psychopaths who control humans by propaganda and mind control, in the movie, "They Live!" Yes, they truly exist , and their shrine is Israel, but they are internationally spread out like cancer, not allowing us know the truth, They are the same people who killed JFK, RFK, MLK, Malcolm X, John Lenon, Carl Sagan, Gus Grissom, Robin Williams who was warned not to have his name in the cast for the movie, "the Secret Agent," in which he is the main protagonist but his name is no where on the list of actors, even in IMDB, while famous actors such as Christian Bale starred in this movie in which inside-job provocateur does similar inside-job conspiracy as the 9/11, of course they don't want us to wake up,and they assassinated Peter Jennings of ABC News with the usual fast-acting cancer for reporting the collapse of the at win Towers as "controlled demolition," and Carl Sagan again with the same fast-acting cancer, Dr. Sagan was trying to wake people up in his last book, "Demon Haunted World," by teaching ways to catch charlatans at their game of propaganda-based deception, including the fraudulent moon-landings and all other fake space-exploration missions that has robbed people hundreds if not thousands of billions of dollars not to mention their hearts and souls, now involving China, Israel and India (the 3-whores of the world), to collaborate as false witness to their hoax by getting them in on the scam, but totally banning the real photographs that the Japanese have taken from the moon, replacing those with the bogus computer graphics screen-saver style of fake animation. The killing of the Electric Car wasn't focused on electric cars, but the battery which again people are in such deep sleep that totally missed out on that. The one thing if not for inventing the Thin-Film Solar Cell that Stanford Ovshinsky should have received a Nobel Prize, was the NiMH battery that Mr. Ovshinsky had invented for the GM's EV1, which later was used for the Toyota RAV-EV and a few other electric cars, but the patents for the NiMH battery who GM swindled out of Ovshinsky's hands, were sold to Texaco oil company that merged with Chevron and almost immediately then, Texaco which was bought by Chevron, was buried and erased, so that people would never be able to get their hands on that patent even if the Supreme Court got involved. Yes, They Live!
Not saying any of your words are untrue but would like to see all the documents that support it. God speed
very simple basic electronics explanation. DMM only measure average voltage. the AC loss can be explained by the up and down slope to zero, as well as the magnetic feild being stored in the water between pulses. DMM shows an average. use a scope if you want to see reality.
There is no third electrode in the device. It is just two. Positive and negative.
Thé circus is a RLC system and de condenser is formed by the two electrodes...
it was a test to show the difference between the use of Direct current verses Alternating Current. as we can see the electrical difference is increased when measured inside the fuel cell. thus there is something about alternating current reacting with the water which creates a positive feedback loop which will speed up the production of hydrogen with less power than once theorized. and what about ac is better also
@@donaldalm2293 very simple. DMM only measure average voltage. the loss can be explaned by the up and down slope to zero, as veryy as the magnetic feild being stored in the water between pulses.
11 Years on we now know the systems set up.. The low pressure gas processor/gun was a new invention. When this device processes non combustible gases i.e. air. And this air is defused and dissolved into water it makes what Stan called water fuel. The processed air will act in a number of different ways but essentially it's an electron sink in the same way oxidation occurs. The processed air requires electrons and with a high electronegativity it will take electrons. Stan used this as a tool. In the first case he used the processed dissolved air in the water to remove electrons from the reaction during electrolysis of water. This changed the reaction by gaining electrons from the reaction and triggering a new process called Voltage polarisation.
Second case is when burning the released gases from water. Combustion efficiency is extremely low; most of the gases turn to water during the combustion moment. But if you use the processed air during combustion and it gains electrons from the combustion moment then the efficiency is improved, the energy release is prolonged, more gas burnt and less gas is turned to water. It’s not commonly known but the efficiency of hho combustion is that,only one millionth of the available energy is released and the rest turns to water.
If you look at Stan Meyer's tubes you will notice that the inner tubes are are longer than the outer tubes. The reason is that it is a tuned circuit. The lengths of the tubes are well documented if you do a little more research. Also, the reason that he is stripping off electrons is so that the ionized air that he introduces later, which is mostly Nitrogen, will bond to the Brown's gas and slow down the burn rate, as to not melt the pistons of the motor. I hope this helps you !!!
Thanks for the input John.
Мейер шуллер! Читайте труды русского учëного Юркина Л. А. 👋👋👋👋👋
Юткина
Some brainiacs need to get the hydrogen powered car going again for Myer legacy.
That's not extraction if you put the negative on top, you're adding more electons, which is what you should do actually, if you have an alkaline solution. I guess Stan was using anode ( + ) on top, which is logical if you call it electron extraction. You can do it both ways, just as there are alkaline or acidic batteries.
Why not you fire them all at once.
he was just testing the difference between DC and AC, if he did them all at once he could have a nice explosion in his hands in what looks like a bedroom
Stan Meyer didnt use tubes. they were just for show. all his magic was performed inside the water injector
@Praque Forqsk well.... he did what he said he did. that much we know. we just dont know how he did it and it seems he was not fully aware how his invention worked. people dont murder frauds.
@Praque Forqsk i see your new here. iv been doing this for a long time mate. you have a lot to learn and your not going to learn by repeating mindless rhetoric.
@Praque You just told the maker of this video, Meyer is a Fraud but you just contradic yourself saying people dont murder frauds,your just like everyone else concrete for brains
I don’t think for show. I think as part of the experiment to get to the eventual creation of the injectors. Lab work requires a lot of larger scale projects before the shrink comes. Meyers own words spoke of creation of microchips of various parts of his large bench experience.
@@marcisaacs9407 yes marc. it is likely that the tubes were an early iteration of his invention and later he just used them for show to illustrate the effectiveness of there gas producing ability. but if any of you know anything of this technology and where it ended up it has nothing to do with gas production. production of gas is not what meyers invention does.
This is absolutely wrong. That patent does not show a Water Fuel Cell. That is a gas resonant cavity. Water does not flow into that cavity. Combustible gases as indicated in the diagram flow into this cavity. You may want to study a patent and understand it before you start offering up circuitry.
Water pulverized only 😋
Do you have any idea of what you are doing? I think not.
Do you?
That water has electrolytes and so it is not the invention of Stanley Meyer.
hmmm, I understand Stan said any water can be used. Including sea water.
You need a tripod or a helper or you need to edit the video
Very nice, good content! but the explanation was too slow and without the necessary preparation. More dynamics is very important!!
Hola okki, esto te va a interesar, saludos, czcams.com/video/LdBeYAMFmG0/video.html
Haha "tap water" is not distilled.
No diodes, no coils, no transformer, no pulsing circuit that will lock on to resonance = no hope.
there are many studies conducted looking for the resonance of water and there are a few values that have found to fit