This is fascinating and shows how much progress has been made. I think the hard work of analyzing an issue, gathering information and formulating an argument using AI has been largely mastered. There is still a lot of room for improvement however. The voice to me sounds too synthetic and to me this interferes with understanding and evaluating the points made. I think the voice must be completely fluid and indiscernible from a human voice. I also found the structure of the machine argument weak in the first part of the debate, but the information it gathered throughout was very strong. What I found most interesting was that even though the human swayed more people's opinion the machine increased their knowledge on the subject. One would think that having more knowledge would lead people to the desired conclusion. I suspect people may have a hidden bias against the machine. I also don't like the format of the debate. I would like to see a free form debate where the machine decides for itself what position to take and forces the human to defend the opposite position. I also believe that either the human or the machine should be forced to concede a loss based on pure logic. I believe machines will be soon be able to completely outstrip humans in the ability to gather and analyse information to reach logical conclusions, optimize problems and perform risk analysis. Humans also seem to lack flexibility in being able to adapt to changing information and situations. I'm excited about the possibility that AI will be able to free mankind from its own biological limitations.
@@thegeneralist7527 Thanks. I will review it as I am curious how it turned out. From the brief that I have read on it.. the machine lost - but I find it interesting that a human was arguing against subsidies for pre school and the machine was arguing for it. What a time to be alive.
You're welcome Kunle. Check out the lecture by Dr Hinton - the father of neural networking at czcams.com/video/fDR1I2Shw_E/video.html. I found it most enlightening.
This is fascinating and shows how much progress has been made. I think the hard work of analyzing an issue, gathering information and formulating an argument using AI has been largely mastered. There is still a lot of room for improvement however. The voice to me sounds too synthetic and to me this interferes with understanding and evaluating the points made. I think the voice must be completely fluid and indiscernible from a human voice. I also found the structure of the machine argument weak in the first part of the debate, but the information it gathered throughout was very strong. What I found most interesting was that even though the human swayed more people's opinion the machine increased their knowledge on the subject. One would think that having more knowledge would lead people to the desired conclusion. I suspect people may have a hidden bias against the machine.
I also don't like the format of the debate. I would like to see a free form debate where the machine decides for itself what position to take and forces the human to defend the opposite position. I also believe that either the human or the machine should be forced to concede a loss based on pure logic.
I believe machines will be soon be able to completely outstrip humans in the ability to gather and analyse information to reach logical conclusions, optimize problems and perform risk analysis. Humans also seem to lack flexibility in being able to adapt to changing information and situations. I'm excited about the possibility that AI will be able to free mankind from its own biological limitations.
Cool, It really looks like the monolith of 2001 a Space Odyssey. #StanleyKubrick
Where to find the full debate?
A better recording of the debate can be found at czcams.com/video/m3u-1yttrVw/video.html.
@@thegeneralist7527 Thanks. I will review it as I am curious how it turned out. From the brief that I have read on it.. the machine lost - but I find it interesting that a human was arguing against subsidies for pre school and the machine was arguing for it. What a time to be alive.
You're welcome Kunle. Check out the lecture by Dr Hinton - the father of neural networking at czcams.com/video/fDR1I2Shw_E/video.html. I found it most enlightening.
And ... Natarajan won that😊
and the chinese communist party.... won the election :-)