4 Khilafah of Yazīd : Incident of al-Harra
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 02. 2020
- 4 Khilafah of Yazeed: Incident of al-Harra
Send us a message! We are happy to address any questions or concerns you may have. Please be as detailed as possible so that we may better assist you. Or you can call us at 619-741-1955
👉 If you love this video, please like and share it.
👉 Don't forget to subscribe to this channel for more update.
👉 Subscribe now: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
💢💢 Watch our other video:
💟 Is The Bible The Word Of God?: • Is The Bible The Word ...
💟 Jummah Khutbah: What is the purpose of life?: • What is the purpose of...
💟 Fiqh of Fasting 1: • 38 Sharh Akhsar al-Muk...
💢💢 Stay with us:
💟 Facebook: / masjidribat
💟 Google Plus: plus.google.com/1114869460949...
💟 Personal Website: www.masjidribat.com/
💟 Email: info@fiqhlessons.com
#UthmanIbnFarooq #Islamicclasses #MasjidRibat
Thank you for watching this video, click the "SUBSCRIBE" button for stay connected with this channel.
Subscription Link: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
Shaik just made The Incident of Harra look so casual. May Allah guide us all to the Path of Truth.
So your south Asian biryani-eating ‘cultural mawlanas’ have the right version of things? First get rid of remnants of Hindu cultural practices in your societies and countries , then try to delve into serious historical things that happened in the Middle East!
Scholars of the past like imam ahmad and dhahabi mentioned the evils they did
@@stadiamak692 I want references
Please give me references if you have read them
this shaikh is gumrah on this topic because he is wahabi
@@abdulbasit- you must be Barelvi
Be careful Sheikh, bayah is not like democracy. Bayah for Caliph was never based on a majority. Rather it's based on Qualification, an area where yezid ranked way below the Sahabas.
Are you shia brother
@@carlsmith3709 just an ordinary Muslim bro. I try to steer away from sectarian classification.
@@ArifIKhan-gg6rx unfortunately sects are everywhere
@@SK-xp9xi that's why we have salah. To cleanse, purify and wash our souls, every day, and to keep it that way.
When sahabah and students called them selves ahlus sunnah, what is the issue with it? Classification has always been there since the fitna happened
I actually feel sad
I really like this shekh but he is really not doing justice. he is literally giving no evidence because they all are fabricated or weak
Sheikh, I respect your idea of "made mistake in Ijtihad", but I must admit its misleading. Please try the idea of "Justice" and "Rahmah" when describing these tragic incidents which affect ALL Muslims. So many innocent lives fell for yezid,s greed and you make light of it. It's not right sheikh...
Oppressive monarchy. As per ahadeeth his time started at 60 Hijri. Abu huraira used to pray to meet Allah s.w.t before 60 Hijri. There is no ijtihad against clear text. Text says that Allah curses the one who oppresses the people of madina.
22:30 HOW UBAIDULLAH IBN ZIYAAD DID HIS BEST:
Narrated Muhammad:
Anas bin Malik said, "The head of Al-Husain was brought to 'Ubaidullah bin Ziyad and was put in a tray, and then Ibn Ziyad started playing with a stick at the nose and mouth of Al-Husain's head and saying something about his handsome features." Anas then said (to him), "Al-Husain resembled the Prophet more than the others did." Anas added, "His (i.e. Al-Husain's) hair was dyed with Wasma (i.e. a kind of plant used as a dye).
حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْحُسَيْنِ بْنِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي حُسَيْنُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أُتِيَ عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ زِيَادٍ بِرَأْسِ الْحُسَيْنِ ـ عَلَيْهِ السَّلاَمُ ـ فَجُعِلَ فِي طَسْتٍ، فَجَعَلَ يَنْكُتُ، وَقَالَ فِي حُسْنِهِ شَيْئًا. فَقَالَ أَنَسٌ كَانَ أَشْبَهَهُمْ بِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم، وَكَانَ مَخْضُوبًا بِالْوَسْمَةِ.
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3748In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 93USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 5, Book 57, Hadith 91 (deprecated numbering scheme)
I am happy to see that there are sane people who speak the truth
It's High time we Sunnis get to know about the truth, the real face of yazid and his walid reported in the Sahih. And how important Ahlul Bayt is.
Don't agree....just read the famous statement of imam ahmed bin Hambal ra...about yazeed that he was a theif.
Clearly ahmed bin hambal was not a prophet and it was his personal opinion,
But still we don't like yazeed,never.
yazeed can be compared to a dustbin before Hassan Or Hussain rA
Long live yazid
@@Aijaz2929 audhu billah
@@carlsmith3709 ?? Abdullaah ibn omar (ra) supported yazid bin muwaviya (ra).
@@Aijaz2929 so?? who cares ?? ibn e umar didnt given bayah to Ali ibn abitalib
@@Aijaz2929Ibn Omar gave Bayah not because he is nasibii ( hatred of Ahlul Bayt ) like what you thought but because to avoid further bloodshed among the ummah!
Jazakallohu khairan from Indonesia
SubHanAllah I love this channel, MaShaAllah AllahumaBarik, please keep up these videos, there are so many lectures on this time period that are filled with weak narrations, and to listen to this sheikhs lectures is so good, please upload videos every day!!
Abu Awf السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
I ask Allah for the ability to upload more videos إن شاء الله please share them with others
@@asifahmad4748 yes it's true, one side does call the other Naasbi based on yazeed. Which is a real shame Tbh. It's become so bad they're not even praying salatul janaza over the ones they call Naasbi. Ahlul hadeeth were once the balanced ones. May Allah guide us all. Ameen
Riyals and submission to ale saud speaks his mind
You'll be questioned on the day of judgement for this allegations. I'll be the witness for reading your allegations.
27:30 IJTIHAAD OF YAZEED'S ARMY DID THIS:
Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab:
When the first civil strife (in Islam) took place because of the murder of 'Uthman, it left none of the Badr warriors alive. When the second civil strife, that is the battle of Al-Harra, took place, it left none of the Hudaibiya treaty companions alive. Then the third civil strife took place and it did not subside till it had exhausted all the strength of the people.
وَعَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرِ بْنِ مُطْعِمٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ فِي أُسَارَى بَدْرٍ " لَوْ كَانَ الْمُطْعِمُ بْنُ عَدِيٍّ حَيًّا ثُمَّ كَلَّمَنِي فِي هَؤُلاَءِ النَّتْنَى لَتَرَكْتُهُمْ لَهُ ". وَقَالَ اللَّيْثُ عَنْ يَحْيَى، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ، وَقَعَتِ الْفِتْنَةُ الأُولَى ـ يَعْنِي مَقْتَلَ عُثْمَانَ ـ فَلَمْ تُبْقِ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ بَدْرٍ أَحَدًا، ثُمَّ وَقَعَتِ الْفِتْنَةُ الثَّانِيَةُ ـ يَعْنِي الْحَرَّةَ ـ فَلَمْ تُبْقِ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ الْحُدَيْبِيَةِ أَحَدًا ثُمَّ وَقَعَتِ الثَّالِثَةُ فَلَمْ تَرْتَفِعْ وَلِلنَّاسِ طَبَاخٌ.
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 4024In-book reference : Book 64, Hadith 73USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 5, Book 59, Hadith 358 (deprecated numbering scheme)
I love you sheikh but don’t agree with most of the things you said based on authentic Hadiths in Bukhari and Muslim which refute your arguments.
pro yazzedis are crazy
Y didbnt u mention any haddith from bukhari & Muslim about Harra? & Start giving reference so people can study themselves so they know where u misleading ur audience ok
You said yazid didn't intend to destroy madina but you clearly said yazid wanted to send ibn Ziad who killed Imam Hussain(ra) to fight people of madina who would be obviously the worst cruel one
Second , letting someone belong less in your house doesn't mean giving bayah,
Imam Ali ibn Hussain(ra) didn't participated in that war but it doesn't mean he gave bayah to yazid and accepted him as his spiritual leader(imam)
alhamdulillah for this video sheikh... i was searching this topic for hours and only could find the shia version, that says the kaabah has been destroyed by yazid during the civil war.. so glad to know that did not happened..
Yazid, who is responsible for the deaths of hussein AS and many others, yazid is the father of the nawasib and the enemies of Islam.
yes it was read Saheeh Muslim# 3245
I need the link the very next lecture from where one ended.
Osama Idrees czcams.com/play/PLExCKwROz20FIgl00JE6DnAf-PBOyJJ-n.html
@@MasjidRibat Not sure whats next following up to this video?
Where is the link to the next lecture?
Osama Idrees czcams.com/play/PLExCKwROz20FIgl00JE6DnAf-PBOyJJ-n.html
You might as well put a pro yazid add from youtube that plays between your speech lol
Bro they love Yazid.
I feel disgusted by their loyalty to Yazid and enmity towards the Household of the Prophet.
They love Banu Umayyah and Banu Abbas who killed all of Imams of Ahlul Bayt one by one. 😵💫
respected shaykh if it was unintentional what abt letter written by zayd ibn arqam r.a to anas ibn malik r.a regarding the incident of waqia harah
He won't mention that, because it doesn't fit in his agenda to adultrate the authentic facts. Here's the Hadith you've mentioned:
.
`Abdullah bin Al-Fadl told me that Anas bin Malik said, "I was much grieve over those who had been killed in the Battle of Al-Harra. When Zaid bin Arqam heard of my intense grief (over the killed Ansar), he wrote a letter to me saying that he heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, O Allah! Forgive the Ansar and the Ansar children. The sub-narrator, Ibn Al-Fadl, is not sure whether the Prophet (ﷺ) also said, And their grandchildren." Some of those who were present, asked Anas (about Zaid). He said, "He (Zaid) is the one about whom Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, 'He is the one whose sound hearing Allah testified.' ( *in Surah Al Munafiqun Verse 08* "They say, "If we return to al-Madīnah, the more honored [for power] will surely expel therefrom the more humble." And to Allah belongs [all] honor, and to His Messenger, and to the believers, but the hypocrites do not know.")
حَدَّثَنَا إِسْمَاعِيلُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي إِسْمَاعِيلُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ عُقْبَةَ، عَنْ مُوسَى بْنِ عُقْبَةَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْفَضْلِ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَنَسَ بْنَ مَالِكٍ، يَقُولُ حَزِنْتُ عَلَى مَنْ أُصِيبَ بِالْحَرَّةِ فَكَتَبَ إِلَىَّ زَيْدُ بْنُ أَرْقَمَ وَبَلَغَهُ شِدَّةُ حُزْنِي يَذْكُرُ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ " اللَّهُمَّ اغْفِرْ لِلأَنْصَارِ وَلأَبْنَاءِ الأَنْصَارِ " ـ وَشَكَّ ابْنُ الْفَضْلِ فِي أَبْنَاءِ أَبْنَاءِ الأَنْصَارِ ـ فَسَأَلَ أَنَسًا بَعْضُ مَنْ كَانَ عِنْدَهُ فَقَالَ هُوَ الَّذِي يَقُولُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " هَذَا الَّذِي أَوْفَى اللَّهُ لَهُ بِأُذُنِهِ ".
يَقُولُونَ لَئِن رَّجَعْنَآ إِلَى ٱلْمَدِينَةِ لَيُخْرِجَنَّ ٱلْأَعَزُّ مِنْهَا ٱلْأَذَلَّ ۚ وَلِلَّهِ ٱلْعِزَّةُ وَلِرَسُولِهِۦ وَلِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَلَـٰكِنَّ ٱلْمُنَـٰفِقِينَ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ
Surah Al Munafiqun Verse 08
Reference: Sahih al-Bukhari 4906
In-book reference: Book 65, Hadith 426
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 6, Book 60, Hadith 429
@@salmankhanghauri literally both sides will stick to there view no matter what actually happens haha
It's high time Sunnis should realise the sugar coating done to evil characters by our ulemas just for maintaining the legacy of Al Sauds
Wallah akhi
It's happened to 😂, I was believe that Umayyads were good
What a baseless argument, I hope you know the punishment of slandering in Islam.
Verily, people who watch movies for knowledge, today, think that they are better than scholars.
@@The_Musalman what scholars? Is this the opinion of the salaf? You’re a joke. Stick to sucking your lollipop and stop claiming anything about the scholars.
can you make video on hisham bin abdul malik and reason why abbasids overthrew ummayyads
The Shaikh said whatever is authentic... People usually like what they want to hear...
This is outrageous
Marwans father al Hakm was exiled by the Nabi pbuh. Ali ibn Hissein despite the tragedy of Karbala and Marwan,s connection to it, sheltered Marwans family because that's the trait of his nobility. There is no evidence of Ali ibn Hussein giving bayah to yezid, unless you can prove it otherwise.
Nasbiyat has got deep rooted inside Ahle sunnat.
Just like Ali's fasiq stepson who killed uthman (Ra) was exiled by everyone but Ali promoted the rebels and killed thousands of sahabas. That's why his army split and went against him to kill him.
@@aldenpadilla1773 you mean the son of Abu Bakr ra?
Shaykh Nasbi Yazeedi
I pray that you will get along with muawiya and yazeed on day of judgement ameen summa ameen
What do you mean by Muawiyah (ra) have you lost your mind at the end he was a sahabi think before you write anything may allah give us hidaya
@@Hazik39 we don't throw all the sahaha that were killed by muawiya only to protect him. He killed many sahabi and he should be condemned which is why rasulallah (saws) did in fact curse him.
Abu sufyan is cursed.
@@Hazik39 Musnad e ahmad 7479
Sahih Muslim 4776
Sahih Bukhari 4108
Sahih Bukhari 4827
Sahih Bukhari 2812
Sahih muslim 6220
Sahih muslim 6628
Sahih muslim 4061
Sahih muslim 2284
Sunan abi dawood 4131
Ibn e maja 121
Al mustadrik hakim 5972 se 5984
Al Mustadrak Hakim#5941Al Mustadrak Hakim#5935
The riyals being deposited monthly in the bank speaks louder then little knowledge he has
after that pls make video on fatimid caliphate and the reason why they took hajarul aswad
Fatimid were a bunch of clowns...
At present they're ismailis ...
In India they even do idol worship
They don't give a damn about Islam now ..
Same in Azerbaijan Kyrgyzstan
The Qaramita of Bahreyn took the Hajar Al Aswad. Not the Fatimids. The Qaramita of Bahreyn were a déviant sect that was fighting the Fatimids
Qarmatians took it, not Fatimids
Shaikh you seem to be following hypocrisy:
1. You are justyifying suppression by Yazid whilst defending the revoult of his father against Khalifa Ali AS
2. You are narrating a hadith about people if Madina and trying to watering down atrocities by what yazid said before his death
3. You are calling yazid a Khalifa while you know he was nominated by his father and he was a king as his father was.
4. You yourself are saying that Yazid's son "Maawia the junior" didn't accept the nomination and wanted as per the sunnah of prophet PBU whilst you are defending the revoult of Mawwia ahmgainst Ali AS and accepting Yazid as Khalifa who was just nominated by his father
There are many more contradictions in your lecture.
In my opinion you are just a HYPOCRAT defending Bnu Ummia and looking down up on Ahlu Bait.
TRY TO REMEMBER HADITH OF GHADUR KHOM
Asteghferollah
I seek refuge and ask Allah swt to guide us and not to bring us under the influence of hypocrates like you.
Shaykh spoke haqq
So surprised to see people in comments who didn't study deen, and history, started judging Sheikh.
Shias has stressed this issue and manipulated it to justify themselves, and has created so much content on internet, that doesn't make it true.
It reminds me of the majority of people thinking zulfikar has a split at end, instead it had a unique structure.
Shias made movies with swords having split ends to glorify the dagger of Abu lulu, which he used to kill Umer(ra)
@@The_Musalman if you are unaware of the opinion of the salaf on yazeed then kindly be quiet. Not everything is the work of the shia.
Oh dear who is the liar? As someone posted in the comments already the Kaaba was destroyed as per sahih hadiths you lied and said it wasn't. Show how special the Kaaba was to you that your more interested in defending Yazeed the murder of the Prophet grandson and family. What would Prophet think of you defending the murder of his family. If you play the game he didn't order why did he keep them prisoners? History proves your liar just like him. Only reason he pretend it wasn't him because he realised the opposition he was getting over his crimes.
It is joke listening to you evilly justify murder. The people in Madina were killed and raped and you justify it because they opposed tyrant evil ruler. But your blind belief that you follower evil ruler of your time defies logic.
Reference : Sahih Muslim 1333 fIn-book reference : Book 15, Hadith 449USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 7, Hadith 3083
'Ata' reported:
The House was burnt during the time of Yazid b. Muawiya when the people of Syria had fought (in Mecca). And it happened with it (the Ka'ba) what was (in store for it). Ibn Zubair (Allah be pleased with him) felt it (in the same state) until the people came in the season (of Hajj). (The idea behind was) that he wanted to exhort them or incite them (to war) against the people of Syria. When the people had arrived he said to them: O people, advise me about the Ka'ba. Should I demolish it and then build it from its very foundation, or should I repair whatever has been damaged of it? Ibn 'Abbas said: An idea has occurred to me according to which I think that you should only repair (the portion which has been) damaged, and leave the House (in that very state in which) people embraced Islam (and leave those very stones in the same state) when people embraced Islam, and over which Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) had raised it. Thereupon Ibn Zubair said: It the house of any one of you is burnt, he would not be contented until he had reconstructed it, then what about the House of your Lord (which is far more Important than your house)? I would seek good advice from my Lord thrice and then I would make up (my mind) about this affair. After seeking good advice thrice, he made up his mind to demolish it. The people apprehended that calamity might fall from heaven on those persons who would be first to climb (over the building for the purpose of demolishing it), till one (took up courage, and ascended the roof), and threw down one of its stones. When the people saw no calamity befalling him, they followed him, demolished it until it was razed to the ground. Then Ibn Zubair erected pillars and hung cartains on them (in order to provide facilities to the people for observing the time of its construction). And the walls were raised; and Ibn Zubair said: I heard 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) say that Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) had observed: If the people had Rot recently (abandoned) unbelief, find I had means enough to reconstruct it, which I had not, I would have definitely excompassed in it five cubits of area from Hijr. And I would also have constructed a door for the people to enter, and a door for their exit. I today have (the means to spend) and I entertain no fearfrom the side of people (that they would protest against this change). So he added five cubits of area from the side of Hatim to it that there appeared (the old) foundation (upon which Hadrat Ibrahim had built the Ka'ba). and the people saw that and it was upon this foundation that the wall was raised. The length of the Ka'ba was eighteen cubits. when addition was made to it (which was in its breadth), then naturally the length appears to be) small (as compared with its breadth). Then addition of ten cubits (of area) was made in its length (also). Two doors were also constructed, one of which (was meant) for entrance and the other one for exit. When Ibn Zubair (Allah be pleased with him) was killed, Hajjaj wrote to 'Abd al-Malik (b. Marwan) informing him about it, and telling him that Ibn Zubair (Allah be pleased with him) had built (the Ka'ba) on those very foundations (which were laid by Ibrahim) and which reliable persons among the Meccans had seen. 'Abd al-Malik wrote to him: We are not concerned with the censuring of Ibn Zubair in anything. Keep intact the addition made by him in the side of length, and whatever he has added frem the side of Hijr revert to (its previous) foundation, and wall up the door which he had opened. Thus Hajjaj at the command of Abd al-Malik) demolished it (that portion) and rebuilt it on (its previous) foundations.
حَدَّثَنَا هَنَّادُ بْنُ السَّرِيِّ، حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ أَبِي زَائِدَةَ، أَخْبَرَنِي ابْنُ أَبِي سُلَيْمَانَ، عَنْ عَطَاءٍ، قَالَ لَمَّا احْتَرَقَ الْبَيْتُ زَمَنَ يَزِيدَ بْنِ مُعَاوِيَةَ حِينَ غَزَاهَا أَهْلُ الشَّامِ فَكَانَ مِنْ أَمْرِهِ مَا كَانَ تَرَكَهُ ابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ حَتَّى قَدِمَ النَّاسُ الْمَوْسِمَ يُرِيدُ أَنْ يُجَرِّئَهُمْ - أَوْ يُحَرِّبَهُمْ - عَلَى أَهْلِ الشَّامِ فَلَمَّا صَدَرَ النَّاسُ قَالَ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَشِيرُوا عَلَىَّ فِي الْكَعْبَةِ أَنْقُضُهَا ثُمَّ أَبْنِي بِنَاءَهَا أَوْ أُصْلِحُ مَا وَهَى مِنْهَا قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ فَإِنِّي قَدْ فُرِقَ لِي رَأْىٌ فِيهَا أَرَى أَنْ تُصْلِحَ مَا وَهَى مِنْهَا وَتَدَعَ بَيْتًا أَسْلَمَ النَّاسُ عَلَيْهِ وَأَحْجَارًا أَسْلَمَ النَّاسُ عَلَيْهَا وَبُعِثَ عَلَيْهَا النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم . فَقَالَ ابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ لَوْ كَانَ أَحَدُكُمُ احْتَرَقَ بَيْتُهُ مَا رَضِيَ حَتَّى يُجِدَّهُ فَكَيْفَ بَيْتُ رَبِّكُمْ إِنِّي مُسْتَخِيرٌ رَبِّي ثَلاَثًا ثُمَّ عَازِمٌ عَلَى أَمْرِي فَلَمَّا مَضَى الثَّلاَثُ أَجْمَعَ رَأْيَهُ عَلَى أَنْ يَنْقُضَهَا فَتَحَامَاهُ النَّاسُ أَنْ يَنْزِلَ بِأَوَّلِ النَّاسِ يَصْعَدُ فِيهِ أَمْرٌ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ حَتَّى صَعِدَهُ رَجُلٌ فَأَلْقَى مِنْهُ حِجَارَةً فَلَمَّا لَمْ يَرَهُ النَّاسُ أَصَابَهُ شَىْءٌ تَتَابَعُوا فَنَقَضُوهُ حَتَّى بَلَغُوا بِهِ الأَرْضَ فَجَعَلَ ابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ أَعْمِدَةً فَسَتَّرَ عَلَيْهَا السُّتُورَ حَتَّى ارْتَفَعَ بِنَاؤُهُ . وَقَالَ ابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ إِنِّي سَمِعْتُ عَائِشَةَ تَقُولُ إِنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " لَوْلاَ أَنَّ النَّاسَ حَدِيثٌ عَهْدُهُمْ بِكُفْرٍ وَلَيْسَ عِنْدِي مِنَ النَّفَقَةِ مَا يُقَوِّي عَلَى بِنَائِهِ لَكُنْتُ أَدْخَلْتُ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحِجْرِ خَمْسَ أَذْرُعٍ وَلَجَعَلْتُ لَهَا بَابًا يَدْخُلُ النَّاسُ مِنْهُ وَبَابًا يَخْرُجُونَ مِنْهُ " . قَالَ فَأَنَا الْيَوْمَ أَجِدُ مَا أُنْفِقُ وَلَسْتُ أَخَافُ النَّاسَ - قَالَ - فَزَادَ فِيهِ خَمْسَ أَذْرُعٍ مِنَ الْحِجْرِ حَتَّى أَبْدَى أُسًّا نَظَرَ النَّاسُ إِلَيْهِ فَبَنَى عَلَيْهِ الْبِنَاءَ وَكَانَ طُولُ الْكَعْبَةِ ثَمَانِيَ عَشْرَةَ ذِرَاعًا فَلَمَّا زَادَ فِيهِ اسْتَقْصَرَهُ فَزَادَ فِي طُولِهِ عَشَرَ أَذْرُعٍ وَجَعَلَ لَهُ بَابَيْنِ أَحَدُهُمَا يُدْخَلُ مِنْهُ وَالآخَرُ يُخْرَجُ مِنْهُ . فَلَمَّا قُتِلَ ابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ كَتَبَ الْحَجَّاجُ إِلَى عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ بْنِ مَرْوَانَ يُخْبِرُهُ بِذَلِكَ وَيُخْبِرُهُ أَنَّ ابْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ قَدْ وَضَعَ الْبِنَاءَ عَلَى أُسٍّ نَظَرَ إِلَيْهِ الْعُدُولُ مِنْ أَهْلِ مَكَّةَ . فَكَتَبَ إِلَيْهِ عَبْدُ الْمَلِكِ إِنَّا لَسْنَا مِنْ تَلْطِيخِ ابْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ فِي شَىْءٍ أَمَّا مَا زَادَ فِي طُولِهِ فَأَقِرَّهُ وَأَمَّا مَا زَادَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحِجْرِ فَرُدَّهُ إِلَى بِنَائِهِ وَسُدَّ الْبَابَ الَّذِي فَتَحَهُ . فَنَقَضَهُ وَأَعَادَهُ إِلَى بِنَائِهِ .
Muawiya - raliallahu Anhu was not Khalifa. The one who created kings rule in Islam. Yazeed is not to be considered as king rather an tyrant.
What the hell? Why was Muawiya (May Allah be pleased with him) not the Khalifa of his time?
@@faizsajjad2328
He was just governor under Umar Usman. When Ali came to power Muawiya dint plead allegiance to Ali but revolted against him.
@@faizsajjad2328 Yazeed son of muavia his grandmother was hinda who ate Hazrat hamza liver
@@haroonabbasi3473 hinda (r) embraced Islam later, Allah subhanawatala and prophet (s) did not reject, although the deviant shias curse them to this very day.
@@sarahnassar8833 Musnad e ahmad 7479
Sahih Muslim 4776
Sahih Bukhari 4108
Sahih Bukhari 4827
Sahih Bukhari 2812
Sahih muslim 6220
Sahih muslim 6628
Sahih muslim 4061
Sahih muslim 2284
Sunan abi dawood 4131
Ibn e maja 121
Al mustadrik hakim 5972 se 5984
Al Mustadrak Hakim#5941Al Mustadrak Hakim#5935
Ask sheikh references what he said it's important for Muslims to know what banu umahhiya did with Muslims especially Ahulul bait
Asslamualaykum brothers, is this a Masjid on the manhaj of Salafiyyah?
Walaikum Asslm, Yes Alhamdulilah
💯 Naasbi defending people of Zulm and oppression defending yazeed May Allah's curse be upon people who killed Hussain ibne Ali Ahlul Bayet and people of Madina and Mecca Ameen
It's easy to throw slanders at people.
قُلۡ ہَاتُوۡا بُرۡہَانَکُمۡ اِنۡ کُنۡتُمۡ صٰدِقِیۡنَ
@@abu_muawwiya_bin_ali Musnad e ahmad 7479
Sahih Muslim 4776
Sahih Bukhari 4108
Sahih Bukhari 4827
Sahih Bukhari 2812
Sahih muslim 6220
Sahih muslim 6628
Sahih muslim 4061
Sahih muslim 2284
Sunan abi dawood 4131
Ibn e maja 121
Al mustadrik hakim 5972 se 5984
Al Mustadrak Hakim#5941Al Mustadrak Hakim#5935
La Hawla Qhuwatta illah Billah. What a preposterous way presenting the history by diluting the facts. It’s a shame that scholars/speakers are trying to hide the oppression of oppressor
Shaikh sahib if muslim bin uqba and yazid were not guilty why both of them were killed by Allah soon after they Attacked madina and Mecca
Both of them dissolved just like salt dissolves in water so hadees fitted Both of them As both of them were guilty
I am sorry to say this is terrible representation of what actually happened. This is pure revisionism.
Yes 100% lol what on earth is this
"he made a mistake in ijtihad" wal iyaadu billah
Imagine criticizing a scholar when the person writing the comment has not even 1% of the knowledge of the scholar. He is just ignorant, anyone reading this just ignore him he is only trying to divide the ummah
@@shehzilmoid8592 i can present bigger scholars going against his interpretation. This is not what Harra actually was. We can disagree with a scholar based on adalah of other scholars. That is not attacking. Many salafies by that logic attack Ibn Jawzi for smashing the lovers of yazeed.
@@shehzilmoid8592 People criticising this NASBI UMAYYAD SHITLICKER is not based on their knowledge rather it’s the mainstream Ahlus Sunnah stance. Yazid literally made his army to burn Ka’ba gilaf and all he has to say is it’s Ijtihad!?! Isn’t there Quran and Sunnah present on what to do that someone has to do ijtihad.
Read hadiths muslim, 3245, 33196496...bukhari 3605, 3748, 4024,4906
These types of so-called Shiekhs prove that Shia Islam is the right path.
The sahabah elected the ummah leader by consultation. While the ummayyad did not follow the sahabah sunnah. This started the tragedy of muslims world until today.
shaykh has a thousand-year-old pledge to the Ummayeds
It’s sad that this “sheikh” is misguided and in loss himself, but it’s even sadder that there are still people out there following him and those like him instead of actually reading, researching and exercising their intellect. This is a pathetic attempt at exoneration of Yazeed, May Allah curse him, and misleading people. His narrative is as absurd as a children’s fictional bedtime story. What a shame! “Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind.”
Why is he misguided? And why do you know better? Did you study islam?
Your profile already shows how misguided you yourself are
Oh another thing you said that when someone has been given to bayat to and another one is standing other one should be killed. So Muawiyah should have been killed when he opposed Imam Hassan (as). Is it not the case ?
go see if Muawiyah may ALLAH be pleased with him asked fit baya when Ali was getting baya
@@The-servant-of-ALLAH1 I am talking about Muawiyah asking for Bayat whereas Imam Hasan(as) was already a Caliph. Even Ibne Taymiyyah included Imam Hasan(as) as a caliph. Go read
@@sheikhmd.salman9692 no doubt al hasan may ALLAH peace be upon him was from the prophetic caliphate, making the word of the prophet peace be upon him, that the prophetic caliphate will be 30 years. He also made truth the word of the truthful peace be upon him that al hassan is a leader, who will make reconciliation between two great muslim groups, and he did that by giving his caliphate to mu’awiya may ALLAH be pleased with him.
@@The-servant-of-ALLAH1 Yeah I know that. what's your point? I have pointed out aligned with this uthman's statement that in the logic of anyone standing against a caliph should be killed. so Muawiyah should have been killed or not
@@sheikhmd.salman9692 Idk where you’re getting this from. Mu’awiya may ALLAH be pleased with him initiated the reconciliation when the two group went to see each other, and he did so secretly. Even Al hassan May ALLAH be pleased with him, had the same intention. Mu’awiya to make this reconciliation gave al hassan the decision whether to be a caliph or mu’awiya be the caliph, but this is where al hassan made truth the word of the prophet Peace be upon him, and he gave away his caliphate to mu’awiya. Also, mu’awiya was already leader on al sham and a lot of the arabian peninsula, and al hassan was in iraq areas. But al hassan’s decision, along with mu’awiya’s intention and efforts, reunited the ummah under mu’awiya.
give references man
how can both sides be fighting be good....why dont you pray that Allah puts you in the camp of Muawiyya...
For you bukhari 2812 is enough record a lecture on it if you are real people of sunnah
rafzi engineer ke pillee sahabas par bunkh tu kutte
Explanation of 2812 has been given countless times from various ullema and people of haq. Don't be fooled by people like Mirza of Jehlum.
@@abu_muawwiya_bin_ali Musnad e ahmad 7479
Sahih Muslim 4776
Sahih Bukhari 4108
Sahih Bukhari 4827
Sahih Bukhari 2812
Sahih muslim 6220
Sahih muslim 6628
Sahih muslim 4061
Sahih muslim 2284
Sunan abi dawood 4131
Ibn e maja 121
Al mustadrik hakim 5972 se 5984
Al Mustadrak Hakim#5941Al Mustadrak Hakim#5935
@@abu_muawwiya_bin_ali😂😂
Give some explanation if you actually have
@@Shia-of-Ali
Muslim 6229
czcams.com/video/kywhpD8Jobc/video.html
czcams.com/video/q-JJiGsjAnc/video.html
Musnad Ahmed 7497
czcams.com/video/fqPniDVVkMY/video.html
Muslim 4776
czcams.com/video/EF0AtE4c9bI/video.html
Bukhari 4108
czcams.com/video/lg0gUKNrhvo/video.html
Bukhari 4827
czcams.com/video/UAejhYOVP_c/video.html
Bukhari 2812
czcams.com/video/tfDNOIxYESg/video.html
czcams.com/video/rfUkLY9LqFM/video.html
Muslim 6220
czcams.com/video/dv-p7UiJmyI/video.html
czcams.com/video/hOCZEJvQ-A4/video.html
Muslim 6628
czcams.com/video/7EPFhepY9ic/video.html
Muslim 4061
czcams.com/video/4WoXr3fB6FQ/video.html
Muslim 2284
czcams.com/video/GdFM-S7MM0I/video.html
Abu Dawood 4131
czcams.com/video/cBSGXOkxFSc/video.html
Ibn E Majah 121 and "Sab o Shitam"
czcams.com/video/UbNFHQ8GJi4/video.html
Mustadrak Hakim 5972 - 5984
czcams.com/video/Ecg_TLIdLDY/video.html
czcams.com/video/J22AjjlKbeQ/video.html
Mustadrak 5935
czcams.com/video/thv1KSrInlc/video.html
Bonus 😘
czcams.com/video/wUEcNMETkMc/video.html
czcams.com/video/WSgeP5IETf4/video.html
I think honesty the ahlul bayt should of been the rulers... no doubt abu bakr and umar were worthy ...but I think it's clear later in history why the ahlul bayt should of been chosen because of the horrible events that took place.
Yazeed lanatullah was totally wrong imam ibne jouji (ra) expose yazeed in his book And mawlana abul ala maududi (ra) book khaifat and kingship clear all doubts.
It logically doesn't make sense they wrote letters for his help then came to fight him I'm not buying it...let's speak the truth and stop trying to cover what really happened
Subhanallah, just to save the honour of Mu'awiya (r.a) you're putting ahlul bait and ahlul medina under the bus. I smell Nasbiat from this speech.
stop acussing and calling names before getting proper knowledge. from proper source
The real believers are those following Ahlulbeit and Quran. The rest just cared about taking more power. Thats why sunnis deviated from truth and finally killed Imam Hussein (A). They hate ahlulbeit, when you say ahlulbeit names, they become mad. That's why we have so much fanatism.
So according to this nasbi sheikh its ok to go shed blood of Muslims in the name of ijtihad it's always haq & batil & it's always save Firqa u should fear allah speak truth instead a lawyer for Banu omiyah I know present NASBI Banu omiyah giving u fame that u love having books & reading books is 2 different things Engineer Ali Mirza hafizullah have exposed u all already
Lol. Engineer has be exposed over and over for the lies he has spread. It's just a shame how many people have been fooled by that man. Search for the truth, what you'll find is that this issue has valid arguments on both sides.
@@abu_muawwiya_bin_ali no ur salfi been exposed as yazzdi shahih bukhari 2812 Mawiyah bin sufiyan & his patty invitors of hell fire
@@tmffj it's amazing how so confidently you can curse the Sahaba, you have been misinformed by people like Mr Mirza. 2812 has been explained in great detail by much more qualified people like muhadiththeen, ullema, hufaaz, etc than Mr Mirza. Bro my advice is to stop being so militant about this, be neutral and try finding the truth and make dua.
@@abu_muawwiya_bin_ali curse shabah where did I cursed u liar
@@abu_muawwiya_bin_ali 1st shia rafdi Mentally disturbed munafiq Mawiyah bin sufiyan who abused khalifa Rashid Maula Ali(as) 60 years after his (as) shahdat in religious & political gatherings
sahih Muslim 6229
Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle's son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah's Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust.
Nasabi
So many people not paying attention to the context of the lecture and a lot of rafidha influenced people here. I implore you my fellow listeners to not read the comments. They are here only to cause problems. They say they have proof, but they don’t present it here.
This isn't a shia position, it's a Muslim position.
Hussan and hussain and many companions were brutalized because of Muawiya and Yazid. This is consensus of all scholars for the first 500 years of Islam.
lol here is proof you nasbi d@g
Musnad e ahmad 7479
Sahih Muslim 4776
Sahih Bukhari 4108
Sahih Bukhari 4827
Sahih Bukhari 2812
Sahih muslim 6220
Sahih muslim 6628
Sahih muslim 4061
Sahih muslim 2284
Sunan abi dawood 4131
Ibn e maja 121
Al mustadrik hakim 5972 se 5984
Al Mustadrak Hakim#5941Al Mustadrak Hakim#5935
Asalam u Alaikum let me clear, yazeed ibn muawia (ra) is not a Khalifa he was king of thats time
Sometimes khilafa and monarchy are interchangeable. Like we say khilafah of ummayids or khilafah of abbassids.
@@osamamanan2723 the calipha rashidun had was a proper Khalifa based on merit, nothing at all in semblance to the horrible monarchies after.
@@kataangsucks so you think that when prophet said that islam will remain strong until 12 caliphs have come to power that only includes rashidoon? Really?
@@osamamanan2723 there is no consensus regarding the 12 after hassan who was the 5th. After that the scholars of sunni Islam differ, but maybe it counts Mahdi as the 6ty and there will be another 6 after that. Or if not that then maybe shia were right thjs whole time. The point is that bani ummayad and bani abbas don't represent ahl ul sunnah one bit
Abu bakr and umar gave rise to this system of kingship when they disobeyed the command of the Prophet leaving behind the Quran and Ahlulbayt.
some people will make every excuse for yazeed haha so gross
Even path not extremely in one side over the other
“I am leaving behind two precious things (thaqalayn) among you. The first of the two is the Book of Allah. In it is guidance and light. So get hold of the Book of Allah and adhere to it." Then he urged and motivated (us) regarding the Book of Allah. Then he said, "And my Ahlul Bayt (family). I urge you to remember God regarding my Ahlul Bayt. I urge you to remember God regarding my Ahlul Bayt. I urge you to remember God regarding my Ahlul Bayt “ Sahih Muslim part 7. Kitab Fadhail Sahaba. When there is direct verse of Quran there is no scope of Ijtihad and when One side has Ahlul bayt the other side has no right of Ijtihad. Lanat on these sellout scholars! Spit on these scholars who hide truth.
Learn to be respectful before uttering words of such significance if you want to learn or converse something first.
@@gaminguchiha3763 A cartoon DP is haram or non-Islamic ? Abu Jahl and people who were the worst enemies of Islam had the same appearance as this guy you are defending. The kind of mentality is the reason why Muslims are where they are. Completely shrouded in ignorance and blindfollowing. Spoiler alert: this so called alims won’t take responsibilities of your actions that you do by listening to them. You are responsible for yourself. So READ, RESEARCH AND ANALYZE. Btw he is not an alim. He can’t even recite properly while reading by sight. Go check out.
@@gaminguchiha3763 There is not a freckle or ounce of importance to either my words or yours. I quoted Hadith. If you wanted to converse you should have directly tell me the problem with the Hadith or problem of the usul that Muhaddiths had formed. Since you had nothing contextual to reply you resorted to meaningless banter with no logical or Islamic standing.
@@sheikhmd.salman9692 Can you please provide the evidence for how the hadith can mean "When there is direct verse of Quran there is no scope of Ijtihad and when One side has Ahlul bayt the other side has no right of Ijtihad" ?
@@gaminguchiha3763 Sahih Muslim 6225-6228 … Prophet(pbuh) left us with Quran and Ahlul Bayt and empathised to be firm on holding onto these things. This is the clear proof that Quran and Ahlul Bayt will always be mutually inclusive. If there was a possibility that Ahlul Bayt would be in the opposite pole of the Quran , the. Prophet(pbuh) wouldn’t have had mentioned Ahlul Bayt. It’s illogical to state follow two things if they are polar opposite. Quran will be upheld by Ahlul Bayt . That’s why Prophet(pbuh) left us with these two heavy things.
Khilafa of yazid , a joke ..
Ahlusunnah is a real mess.
This lecture is so wrong from so many levels.. sheikh makes it look like nothing has happened 😂
read the bible--------------- genesis 17;20 about the 12 imam of shia
Lanit on yazeed n muaviya
This is the reason no one listens to yous shais. Instead of making it an educated discussion you slander and curse which repels people away from you.
You’re following Banu ummaya in cursing the Sahaba and we are following Ali AS in making dua for the Sahaba. Alhamdulillah. Read Nahjul balagha khutba 126.
May Allah’s curse be upon you. Don’t curse Muawiya (May Allah be pleased with him). And the position of Ahlus-Sunnah is we don’t love or curse Yazeed. Please acquire knowledge instead of commenting like a jahil Shia
@@faizsajjad2328 why trying to safe yazeed because he was from Banu umaia ?
And there is Ammar ibn yasir shahdat headees about muavia why you guys still trying to safe these notorious and if someone will speak out you guys label as Shia ,shame on you I am not Shia but you guys are not on right path do ur ishlah
May Allah curse be upon you. If you curse any of the Sahaba.
Subhanallah even as a Sunni it sounds like Yazid caused much dhulm on the ummah. A man like him should’ve never been given bay’ah to begin with. Especially when there were ashaab present.