Artemis vs Saturn V Liftoff Comparison - SLS, Apollo, Launch, Camera Views, NASA, Apollo 17
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 06. 2023
- Multiple camera side-by-side views comparing SLS to Saturn V liftoff. Two night launches are shown: Artemis 1 on October 20, 2021 and Apollo 17 on December 7, 1972
Sequences are presented at approximate real scale, and synchronized visually to the timing of Solid Rocket Booster ignition. Camera angles were also matched as possible. Audio from SLS is played on the left channel, and from Saturn V on the right.
Sound and image cleanup, remastering and editing by RetroSpace HD.
========================================
The Space Launch System (SLS) is an American super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle in development by NASA. As the primary launch vehicle of the Artemis moon landing program, SLS is designed to launch the crewed Orion spacecraft on a trans-lunar trajectory. The first SLS launch was the uncrewed Artemis 1, which took place on 16 November 2022.
Saturn V is a retired American super heavy-lift launch vehicle developed by NASA under the Apollo program for human exploration of the Moon. The rocket was human-rated, with three stages, and powered with liquid fuel. It was flown from 1967 to 1973. It was used for nine crewed flights to the Moon, and to launch Skylab, the first American space station.
========================================
A special thanks to the channel supporters ( / retrospacehd ):
Andrew Hamburg
Andy Ball
Asbjørn
Bathypterois
Bill Hurley
Darcy Barrett
David Graves
Drew Granston
Ellie Burack
Elpacholag
Francis Bernier
Francisco Forero
Gary Smith
Gio Pagliari
Glenn W. Hussey
Iain J
Jackson Johnson
Jan Strzelecki
Jeff Pleimling
Jules E
Kevin Spencer
Marco Zambianchi
Martin J Lollar
Michael Pennington
Nathan Koga
Nathan Westwick
Noah Soderquist
Popio
Rick Durr
Ryan Hardy
Scott Manley
========================================
#saturnv #artemis #launch - Věda a technologie
![tattoo printer tutorial[제품단순선물]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g40_GwEJak0/mqdefault.jpg)
Never ceases to amaze that the Saturn V was designed and built in the era when the slide rule was king and drafting was done by hand…
They sure knew how to get things done back then!🚀🚀👍👍
Saturn and Apollo each had on-board digital computers for automatic flight and navigation, plus NASA had several ground computers for automated checkout, flight planning, simulation training, and real-time operations and tracking.
The Artemis launch was a hell of a show to watch. So grateful I got to watch it.
1:37 "Artemis, Houston you're go at throttle up."
"Roger, we are go at throttle up!"
Soon...
Once block 2 starts flying, the throttle down will no longer happen- the boosters will have the maxQ throttle bucket cast into their propellant grain and the main engines will be able to stay at full thrust during that time!
I’ve got the Lego Saturn V. I hope they make the SLS too.
Still can’t beat the Saturn V liftoff!!!
Don't forget about SpaceX Starship.
@@foxmccloud7055 Well we'll see if the next Starship launch will be at night!
No matter how modern SLS is, that launch could never beat the Saturn V punching its way off the ground and through its own smoke cloud and into the air.
"BOOSTERS INGNIDSDSiNNN!!!" never gets old.... :D
LMAO LMAO AND LMAOOO
"BOOSTERS INDIGESTION!!"
The SLS/Artemis launch was on 16. November 2022!
The SLS is more advanced and more efficient no doubt about that but the Saturn V has a different awe and magnanimous energy as it steadily and initially slowly rise up like a king commanding attention and respect.
The Saturn is actually more capable/efficient than the SLS in terms of payload capacity, though the SLS ascended quicker and has slightly more thrust.
Because hindsight allows you to copy the Apollo things as the start point of excellence for your adventure.
If you stuff that up, with such a precedent to copy/improve on, then.................
@@jmwoods190 i wouldnt say more efficient
The difference in LEO capability comes from the fact current SLS version is much lighter and smaller than Saturn V, even though it has more efficient propulsion.
0:07 Artemis 1 was November 16th 2022, not the date you posted.
Great stuff! The thing I loved about the early launches - always filmed on 16, 35 or 70mm film which has a wide dynamic range and they used up to 4,000mm focal length lenses. Not what was seen on TV as film needed to be developed, but awesome quality video after the launches. Shuttle launches at these distances I believe were just broadcast video except those high frame per second film cameras on the pad which were developed and analyzed after the fact. Now we’re up to 4K or 8K HDR, but I’m still not sure the quality is as good as film. Close though. I believe the distant film - the “Recording Optical Tracking Instrument” (ROTI) had focal length of up to 12,700mm, and enough magnification to follow the launch for up to five minutes. Not sure if that was used during STS as much. At least not for broadcast.
They’re actually still using film in addition to digital. About a month ago, a bunch of film footage from the Artemis I launch was released. It’s pretty awesome!
Retro Space Hd, do you have any videos of STS-7/Challenger with Sally Ride?
Nasa has got to get rid of that clown who did the commentary of SLS right before liftoff. A PAO should report the events without excitement, and as matter-of-factly as possible.
I'm not even sure why there ALWAYS has to be a clown 🤡 talking over the sound of the most exciting 20 or 30 seconds of a launch.
@@TanksInSpace_ Is this the "we rise together" flog?? 🙄🙄
If so, one has to ask..... WTF are you on, and where's the taser?
I have no problem with it, but if you want to blame someone for it, Blame SpaceX for that. They are the ones who started it
Maybe the N1 Russian Moon rocket Vs Saturn 5 is needed. Strange to compare technology that has 50 years between them
Right up to the N1 exploding?
Saturn V went 9 times to the moon and back, including 6 moon landings.
If they did that, assuming there was any N1 launch footage to be found, it would be a really short video. N1's didn't fly very far before having problems, unlike the graceful Saturn V.
@@TastyBusiness There were 2 night N-1 launches, 5L & 6L. 5L was the infamous one that blew right after liftoff weeks before Apollo 11, while the 6L cleared the pad, but blew up less than a minute later. However, the actual footage of the 6L's flight has proven to be extremely hard to find (most YT videos labelled '6L' actually show the 7L instead).
Saturn V was hand-built lot of changes were put in on the fly as they didn't have time to go back to changing the plans and republishing.
They say SLS is more powerful than Saturn V. So why can't it throw as much mass toward the moon? Sure, it has more thrust at liftoff, but those solids taper off as they climb, where the Saturn first stage thrust increased with altitude. Considering the whole flight, Saturn delivered more power where it counted.
Thats not the reason.
Reason lies in second stages. SLS still has interim upper stage that is undersized for the core stage, beacuse congress didnt want to apply proper funding. With future upgrades SLS will match Saturn V at some point with Block 2
@@_mikolaj_ Not quite. Block 2 payload to TLI is still one ton short of Saturn V.
@@ClausB252 keep in mind these figures are made using current data. Over time as mass is saved on the vehicle(already happening between Artemis 1 and 2), there is a very real possibility this one more ton is squeezed out.
@@ClausB252 I myself don't work at NASA or in any of the companies that build SLS, but I do know some people that do. The current public information on the capabilities of SLS are mostly outdated. The current publicly available data of the EUS was released around 2018. Since then there have been several re-designs. The Block 2 information is even more outdated. Boeing has talked about switching over to composite fuel tanks for EUS sometime in the future. This should increase it's performance by 30%. With this upgrade we could be looking at 60-72 tons to TLI. This year Boeing should be releasing some updated info on the capabilities of EUS now that they've began building the first one. SLS Block 1 is a good example of how long it takes for information to be publicly released. From 2011-2018, everyone assumed SLS B1 would only be able to lift 70T to LEO, but in late 2018/ early 2019 this information was finally updated and NASA publicly shared that B1 would be able to deliver 95T to LEO.
Edit: James "Jim" Free said last year that they want to wait to see if they get actual flight data to publish updated EUS specifications.
Hi Bob!
Hi Bob
its too bad that clark kent impersonator f*** up the historic launch, I mean after 50 years Man. So F up. To change the voice would be silly.
God bless their souls, it was not their faults.
Artemis is a joke compared to the Saturn V liftoffs. It's designed to be.