Starship! Plz plz starship it would be really a pleasure Plz starship it’s an important rocket! If you can’t for some reason I can understand then make a video about falcon heavy or falcon 9 rockets! Edit: bruh for the love of god stop reply to me i already know and many people reply to me no one knows inside it and look my back comments and scroll down I ALREADY MADE REASON WHY I WANT HE TO MAKE STARSHIP VIDEO JUST SCROLL DOWN ALREADY LAZY BLIND PEOPLE! Am pissed from those reply the same comments about no one knows inside starship freaking annoying fr for same comments Edit: oh wait how about Voyager 1 and voyager 2
Marverlous video as always! A couple of extra facts: 1) When the rocket lifts off and the four support arms retract, they don't do so under any power. The rocket simply sits on top of them unretained, and when the engines are producing enough thrust it starts rising. The arms then retract thanks to the yellow counterweights, whose weight is no longer balanced by that of the rocket. It's all gravity-driven! 2) When the boosters separate they form the Korolёv Cross, which is unique to this rocket. This is because the chief designer (Sergei Korolёv) of the rocket wanted to minimize the number of explosive bolts required for the separation, all the way back in the 1950's. Shortly before the fuel of the booster runs out, the bottom attachment points are cut. The boosters are now allowed to swing about a pivot at their very top, because the engines are still running and producing off-axis thrust. When the boosters have reached a sufficient angle, the pivots are released and a valve opens at the top of each booster. This valve vents the gaseous oxygen still present inside the tanks, which produces a thrust that makes the boosters spin in the opposide direction and away from the rocket. A real work of art
Another thing that I find really interesting is that the launch escape system on the Soyuz destroyed the rocket on it's first (uncrewed) launch by firing because it thought it was "too tilted". What actually happened was that the launch was delayed, meaning the earth rotated during the time, making the LES think it was tilted. (7k-ok-1) The Soyuz was also a spacecraft first designed to go to the moon, just like the Apollo of the US. It was supposed to launch on a rocket called the N-1, which had a very awesome (30) amount of engines. It was sadly cancelled due to being outcompeted by the US, and the fact that the godly amount of engines were simply too much for an computer in the 1960s to handle, causing 4 failures. The Soyuz rocket is also a massive evolution of the rocket that took the first man into space, the Vostok. If you search online for photos, you'll be amazed at how similiar the overall design of the rocket is.
To add to that, if I remember it correctly from our lectures: 3) In case of failure on a return leg, Souz is designed to survive even that. If the descent module fails to separate, joints are designed to "burn through" by heated plasma and release the descent module. There were multiple cases through Soyuz explotation when it happened which caused Soyuz to switch from "controlled" to "ballistic" descent, which is another safety feature. 4) In case of any failure with de-orbit thrusters or at any deorbiting steps, Soyuz can switch from "controlled" descent to "ballistic" mode. There is a safety design in the form and mass distribution of the capsule itself. The form and center of gravity are designed so that oncoming air will flip the vehicle head-shield first even if deorbit or separation have failed. And the mass distribution makes the vehicle deliberately a lit bit of balance, what causes it to spin, what makes "ballistic" re-entry more stable. On the downside, it significantly adds G-load, which can be up to 9g on ballistic re-entry.
Not only that, legend says: Back in 60"s NASA spent huge amount of money to create or invest in a Space Pen (later also called "Fisher Space Pen") to work in zero gravity, while the Russian since the beginning just used Pencils... lol (not everything in this story is true, but is funny to see these two ways to solve problems)
@@Soaresbruh That's a myth. Both NASA and Russia started using pencils, but it wasn't ideal. Graphite would break off and get into the ventilation and the wood of a pencil was flammable. The Fisher Pen Company found out about this and created the Fisher Space Pen to sell to NASA. Today, both NASA and Russia still use it. They cost 6 dollars per pen.
Funny fact: the four supports of the Soyuz rocket are not retracted by hydraulics or some other mechanism. In fact, these are just "swings" that recline with a counterweight when the weight of the rocket disappears at launch. A simple solution that has been working flawlessly for decades
This is so beautifully done! I intend to show it to my four year old great grandson who loves space. Last night we took the boys to Chabot Space and Science Center in Oakland, where we saw a reentry vehicle labled CCCP. It was a gift from USSR to NASA. We can play nicely if we try.
There is also a very interesting ceremony for everyone who travels to space via Russian space ports and space agencies. They are gathered in front of a very special "space travel" book before the flight and their names are entered into this very special register. This book was started by Gagarin, the first human who flew into space providing a continuous historic record since then. The register is kept in the Star City.
There are several more informal space rituals. When Gagarin drove up to the rocket on the bus, he wanted to take a piss out of excitement. There is nowhere to hide in the desert, and he did it on the back wheel of the bus. Since then, many astronauts, even women, have repeated this ritual) All cosmonauts also watch a Soviet western on their first day in orbit ... No, eastern "White Sun of the Desert"
Imagine a situation when someone travels into space having forgotten to pee. And the mission is aborted to screaming crew members "I need to go to the toilet, stop the flight, I am dying to go to pee...." LOL
@@user-qe1uj7tl6w Imagine a situation when someone travels into space having forgotten to pee. And the mission is aborted to screaming crew members "I need to go to the toilet, stop the flight, I am dying to go to pee...." LOL
it's crazy how humans have advanced, once we had swords speaking with signs, now we are literally in space, about to explore the entire universe, just... mind blowing
we probably wont explore the universe in the next 10000 years since the fastest you can go (speed of light) isnt avaible to us yet and max speed we have reached is only like 2 percent if i remember correctly, and our own galaxy which is really small considering how big the universe is, is 1000 light years long so not soon 😬
3:23 small innacuraccy, the vernier engines of the core actually line up with the boosters. Thats why the boosters have that cutout, to fit the verniers. Everything else was amazing, very great work.
This is one of those criticisms I enjoy, “hey you got this tiny little thing wrong, here’s how it was wrong, but that mistake doesn’t devalue the rest of the video”
Thousands of research institutes worked on the creation of this rocket. More than a million Soviet citizens of various specialties were involved. This rocket is still the safest rocket for flights to low-Earth orbit in the whole world.
Fun fact: the R7 rocket (family), which Soyuz is a part of, was originally intended for delivering hydrogen bombs. When the R7 was complete, hydrogen bombs had been miniaturized which made the R7 heavily overkill. So the Soviets used it as an orbital launcher for Sputnik. Since the maiden flight in the 50’s, the R7 family of rockets has the most launches in the world.
Немного корректировки: Сергей Павлович Королёв изначально и собирался делать всё для освоения космоса. А на военном применении настаивало правительство. Королева даже отправляли в ссылку за то, что он больше склоняется в сторону космоса.
@@was5301 ну вы тоже немного неправы. Не в ссылку, а на Колыму, в ГУЛАГ, подыхать на золотом руднике. А сделать ракету под видом военной ракеты космическую - это было потом.
@@ivan2nem912 Да вы я посмотрю лингвист прямо. А чем понятие «ссылка»отличается от Колымы и ГУЛАГА? В общем значении конечно. Сразу видно в вас либеральное нутро, при каждом удобном случае трындеть запатентованные название Колыма и Гулаг. ))) Как видите Королев очень даже не умер и далеко не только он один.
What are you writing for? And the purpose of the cargo compartment of the Space Shuttle by the Americans is still classified. Intended, among other things, for a bomb load. And now, the Americans are testing the Boeing X-37. who has a military appointment.
I have seen how several Russian soldiers and techs come to help the ISS crews when they come back to earth. It doesn't matter if the astronauts are American, french or Italian. I wish one day the governments of the world understand that together we can be stronger, better and happier.
Even if most of the governments come to an agreement, it would be unbearably hard to decide - how is it to be happier? Atheistic, Christian that way, Christian this way, or maybe Islamic?
The interasting fact - The four truss legs shown at 8:20 minutes hold the rocket without motors. The rocket is placed on the bed of these supports , and under the center of gravity, the supports move inward, pressing the rocket and hold the rocket on vertical pozition . And when the rocket starts to take off, the weight on the support decreases and the supports open automatically .
5:51 The escape tower was used once: during the Soyuz T-10-1 mission. The rocket was sitting on the launchpad when there was a fire caused by a malfunctioning pump. The escape tower was triggered and the crew was launched 6 seconds before the rocket exploded.
Приветствую, вы ошибаетесь. Система аварийного спасения работала довольно много раз, на разных ракетах в беспилотных, тестовых запусках. Союз/Протон/Н1, всё нештатные и аварийные ситуации система отработала полностью. Если говорить о пилотируемых миссиях то я предложу вам ознакомиться с этим списком : Союз-18А 1975 год - сбой работы второй ступени, аварийное приземление в Горный Алтай. Космонавты спасены. Перегрузка достигала 20g Союз т10 1 1983 год, как вы упомянули. До старта ракеты, за 2 секунды перед взрывом увела капсулу с космонавтами , перегрузка достигала 16 g. Космонавты спасены. Союз МС 10 2018 год. Известный всём случай. Аварийная ситуация при разделений 1й ступени на 165 секунду. Космонавты спасены.
Dude you do the most detailed and interesting presentations and animations you really have a talent and you need more love for this channel so if you guys have not subscribed you should it's worth it
If I were going to space, I would insist on using the Soyuz. The Russians have perfected this system over several decades, and it has proven itself to be extremely reliable. I lift my hat to those Russian engineers who developed such a trustworthy system.
I came here to watch the Russian rocket launch especially lift-off, as I've always admired the way it looks so simple yet elegant, with its different colored boosters and flames but I got to see something impressive than I had imagined. The level of detail and precision that goes into every aspect of a space flight is truly awe-inspiring. I now understand why we say "it's not rocket science" to mean that something is not as complicated as it may seem. A great deal of thought and planning goes into every step of a space flight and it is a testament to the ingenuity and dedication of the people who make it all possible. I salute the great minds behind this. Further more silly , I always used think why the inner side of boosters were painted to red knowingly that they will get evaporated ?? but I have the answer for that too. Thanks for such an amazing content, very well presented with detailed animations and Kudos to efforts put into this.
First of all, absolutely phenomenal CAD/animation work, Jared. I’m so fascinated to see the difference and similarity of the Russian space program, who have been at it longer than anyone on earth. Despite basics dictated by the mission and physics, I can see that the Russians have developed some interesting advantages, such as ground landings and multi-engine configurations. Our work together is humankind’s signature achievement, risking life and treasure together on a job bigger than either nation can do alone, and this with each other’s staunchest political enemy. I wonder if this irony is really appreciated enough. Enemies on earth, closest of friends in space.
If I understood correctly, the Russians did not spoil anything. They did the smartest thing so that the system works to this day, not disintegrating and rumbling shuttles. Russia and the USА in the mainstream are enemies, but the truth is different.
Just imagine what humanity would have achieved if it had united! But instead, we are constantly waging a senseless struggle with each other and destroying our planet.
@@JaredOwen It definitely takes a LOT of time... making a 3D animation in itself is a time taking job! but , making something related to space! My god that's time taking. But your efforts are worth it sir. It helps us appreciate the hard work of engineers and the extent to which humans have figured out science! And not to forget, it helps us learn. Thank You :)
I was anxious for this video's release, your hard work surely was worth it! Congrats! By the way, some random fact: The first (and still yet, the only) Brazilian astronaut/cosmonaut Marcos Pontes got to the ISS in a Soyuz Mission! The event was known here in Brazil as Missão Centenário (Centenary Mission), and internationally as the Soyuz TMA-8. The mission got it's name (in Portuguese) as a tribute to the centenary anniversary of the 14-bis flight by Santos Dumont. The mission also had the crew of the american astronaut Jeffrey Willians and the russian cosmonaut Pavel Vinogradov.
I always been fascinated by the soyuz as its really is a interesting machine I believe my favorite part of it is the fact it has its own solar panels and in a way has all the hall marks of a those old school science fiction spaceships a truely respectable piece of engineering
Great video! I have just a little remark to add: once in mid 70's the soyuz capsule "managed to land" on a lake due to some technical issues... so not only the NASA modules land on water... 😁
This is an excellent descriptive animation - and it answered a number of queries I've had for years but have NEVER seen described elsewhere. Great job, Well Done!
Jared, your space videos are fantastic, I just happen to enjoy the space stuff the most, excellent work doing this for us. Would/could you do one perhaps covering the Apollo space missions in particular one where the Lunar Rover is concerned, would be great to see the workings on the surface of the moon, flight stowage and deployment. Many, many thanks Regards Mark.
Doesn't SpaceX also put together their Falcon 9 rockets in the horizontal position, and then raise them into the vertical launch position as well? That's what I've been toldd by a tour guide while on a bus tour of one of the launch sites they use which is the Kennedy Space Center
Amazing video as always Jared! Somehow I missed this one in my subscription feed XD I'm usually always on top of your stuff. But fantastic explanations and animation!! You always impress me with your work. Also, congrats on 2 Million subscribers!!! Huge milestone for ya! Looking forward to your next video, and outstanding work as always :D
the fact that the command module is in the middle and not on the top add another layer of safety. I think it was well designed with safety in mind. Love that the command pilot have to use a stick to poke some command. and the g indicator.... They are so russian :D
The Soyuz rocket was first launched in 1966, and the Saturn V rocket was first launched in 1967. Sergei Korolev was the chief designer of the Soyuz rocket. It is amazing that the Soyuz rocket is still in use today.
You couldn’t have done it better !!!!! I just 3D printed a 50 inch Soyuz that’s why I wanted to see all details ….. I am super happy with your amazing video. Thx
First of all: Great video as always. Secondly: One has to love the ingenuity of Russian Space Engineering. Can't reach the controls? *Use a stick.* Need an indicator for weightlessness? *Stuff Toy on a String it is.*
Even the 4 supports to hold the rocket down are without any control, they hold it just by it's own weight, once the rocket starts going up it permits them to release the rocket itself.
@@emkkahn That's true, however the Russians *did switch* to the "Space Pen" once it was available since granite residue can be really hazardous in a Micro-G environment.
@@emkkahn Yeah, but the pencils weren't regular pencils, they were weird wax crayon-like ones, as graphite & wood shavings would get into & damage electronics in 0g. Because of this they... kinda sucked. At writing. :/
Great video Jared! How long does it take you to do the research, writing, modeling, animating, rendering, and final comp work for one of these? Do you do it all yourself? Stellar work!
Před 3 měsíci+1
This is AWESOME. Thank you for preparing this great animation.
Just wanted to thank you for your amazing educational videos. Our 4 year old has been demanding your videos daily for the last year. We learn alongside him and its unbelievable to see him enjoy learning and retain the info and use it in his play later. Thank you! 🥰
7:49 my dentist also plays music to try and relax me before he drills. I can speak from experience when I tell you NO AMOUNT of music can negate the terror that his drill's high-pitched sound invokes 😮
Yay Another animation video by my favorite YT channel! These are highly detailed and very researched through of what goes when and which part is named. I can't wait for this channel to grow so BIG that we could enjoy these unique videos such as this one a bit more often. What an amazing one person job, thank you Jared Owen for your hard work!
Хорошая анимация. Смотрится на "одном дыхании" как говорят в России. Но можно было бы рассказать и о том, что "Союз" не просто падает, а спускается по особой траектории, чтобы снизить перегрузки.
Questions: 1) what are those red cone engine nozzle inserts protecting against? 2) At what velocity is the craft going when it actually hits the ground?
My guess for Q1 is protection from anything that could enter the engine. Like birds, dirt/dust. Insects etc. It is like the "remove before flight" protective caps for airplanes when they are stored.
Awesome video! Just a little commentary for comparison with other rockets: The Russians use a different stage numbering system than the rest of the world. In the US, the Soyuz would be considered a 2 or 2.5 stage rocket. The boosters aren't counted as a stage separate from the core because they all fire at the same time. So the core is considered the first stage, the upper stage is the 2nd stage, and the boosters are boosters, sometimes considered a half stage, so 2 or 2.5 stages under that criteria, not 3. The Space Shuttle, for example, was considered a 1.5 stage rocket in the US, the main stage and a half stage for the boosters. Meanwhile, the Russians would've considered it a 2 stage rocket (that's how they counted the Buran). So, what the Russians call 3rd stage MECO would've been called SECO in the US. Another detail, you mention that the LES has saved lives a few more times, which is correct, but not on flight. The launch you mentioned, MS-10, was actually the very first time a LES had actually activated with astronauts in flight ever, not just on Soyuz but on any spacecraft. Besides that, the LES had only been used on Soyuz twice before, on one occasion, fire on the rocket, LES activated, and one after a rocket launch aborted, and while the rocket was being safed, the third stage pyros activated, killing a pad worker and setting off the LES.
Actually you are wrong, MS-10 didn't use the LES. LES is jettisoned few seconds before the boosters. So by the time that one booster failed to separate LES was already gone. At that point Soyuz spacecraft leaves the rocket using inertia and not an LES.
@@Thillith No, you are wrong. The Soyuz LES is not composed of just the tower. All the way up to booster separation, Soyuz would use the LES tower. After the tower is jettisoned, it retains a smaller part of the LES, composed of 4 RDG motors that are hidden in the fairing. The two stages that are blowing up right below you have just as much inertia as your capsule, and you don't want to hang out there for the explosion. The RDGs have less thrust and overall delta-v than the tower, but that isn't necessary at that point. The tower is needed before precisely because the boosters offer a lot of thrust, and the RDGs alone wouldn't be enough to pull away the capsule fast and far enough. MS-10 was pulled away by the LES, specifically by the RDGs.
We always appreciate you Jared for the great work of opening our minds on the abstract side of Life. I request you to animate Tottenham Hotspurs' stadium in England. I wanna its mechanism of changing its turf
US: we’ll build an instrument connected to an accelerometer to precisely measure the g-forces exerted by the- Russia: just hang a beanie baby on a string
Хорошее качественное видео. Автору респект, очень много фактологии и всё в доступной форме, а это важно когда речь идёт о таком сложном процессе как космический полет.
Greetings from Russia! What a lovely video, idea and animation. Such video must be shown at school, instead of boring lessons with old fashioned books from previous century. I noticed, that even word "СОЮЗ" is written on the rocket, while assembling in horisontal position :-) Waiting for a new gorgeous videos!
I like the journey of Soyuz spacecraft that's amazing! thank you so much for such awesome animated video.I feel like I'm on a journey with the spacecraft while I watching the video.
9:40 I've read that firing of the upper stage whilst the first is still attached is called 'Fire in the hole'. Ensuring that the fuel is forced back towards the engines is called ullage. Saturn had specific engines that fired for that purpose.
13:00 during Re-Entry, of course the astronauts (or cosmonauts) experience 4G during this part of the decent, if the thrusters (automatic systems) fail, they can either use a backup controller or the steeper ballistic decent, during a ballistic decent, the G load increases to 9! I think that’s more than what a fighter pilot pulls, but imagine doing the Ballistic decent when you have been up without gravity for 6 months.
9G is right up at the top of what a Fighter pilot can do, and most of them couldn't withstand that for the length of time they'd experiance it in this case. Airshow/demonstration pilots would be under strain even.
@@DFX2KXty for letting me know! :) I’ve been watching the more in depth videos about the soyuz launch, rendezvous / docking, and the landing before Jared’s videos were posted, it’s so fascinating to learn about new things! I’m very curious
09:46 is called “Hot Staging” that is why on the 2nd stage there is a ring with holes on top Also the Launch shroud can work as a payload fairing as well
Great video! But during reentry, there's heat but no fire :p only plasma! Its not coz of the friction, it's coz of pressure! Basically, an object (capsule) slams air so hard air can't escape fast enough to the side and as more and more air is slammed onto, in this case heat shied, the pressure rises immensely and thats what creates the plasma and the heat. There's no fire :)
@@tyrannosaurusimperator Fire is usually used when something combusts creating said heat/plasma. The pressure alone creating the heat wouldn't *technically* be fire except maybe on the micro level with anything in the atmosphere/stratospheric (but I'm realistically using a vacuum) Its easy to see how it could be considered fire though
Amazing video, I love it! One small remark - if we would like to be correct in metric system units it should written as 1670 km/h (not "1670kph"). Kph is the imperial way of writing metric units.
13:22 Fire and heat can't of course prevent radiosignals from coming through. It is the plasma that builds up due to the heat. Currently there are systems in development to overcome this problem.
@@chabveasna8400 Plasma is technically not a gas, but a forth state of matter. That's the whole point. Plasma is ions and thus disturbs radio connection, gas isn't. And the flames we usually call the fire are actually hot gas.
“The zero-g indicator will begin to float and the crew members will feel weightless for the first time” -Jared Owen Me: what if they already went to space, especially the commander
The big question now...what should I animate next?!🤔
Perseverance and Ingenuity.
Starship! Plz plz starship it would be really a pleasure Plz starship it’s an important rocket!
If you can’t for some reason I can understand then make a video about falcon heavy or falcon 9 rockets!
Edit: bruh for the love of god stop reply to me i already know and many people reply to me no one knows inside it and look my back comments and scroll down I ALREADY MADE REASON WHY I WANT HE TO MAKE STARSHIP VIDEO JUST SCROLL DOWN ALREADY LAZY BLIND PEOPLE! Am pissed from those reply the same comments about no one knows inside starship freaking annoying fr for same comments
Edit: oh wait how about Voyager 1 and voyager 2
How does elevator works? 👍👍
Space X reusable rocket please
Crew dragon
Marverlous video as always!
A couple of extra facts:
1) When the rocket lifts off and the four support arms retract, they don't do so under any power. The rocket simply sits on top of them unretained, and when the engines are producing enough thrust it starts rising. The arms then retract thanks to the yellow counterweights, whose weight is no longer balanced by that of the rocket. It's all gravity-driven!
2) When the boosters separate they form the Korolёv Cross, which is unique to this rocket. This is because the chief designer (Sergei Korolёv) of the rocket wanted to minimize the number of explosive bolts required for the separation, all the way back in the 1950's. Shortly before the fuel of the booster runs out, the bottom attachment points are cut. The boosters are now allowed to swing about a pivot at their very top, because the engines are still running and producing off-axis thrust. When the boosters have reached a sufficient angle, the pivots are released and a valve opens at the top of each booster. This valve vents the gaseous oxygen still present inside the tanks, which produces a thrust that makes the boosters spin in the opposide direction and away from the rocket. A real work of art
Thanks
Good there's people like you, is really useful to have an extra information.
Another thing that I find really interesting is that the launch escape system on the Soyuz destroyed the rocket on it's first (uncrewed) launch by firing because it thought it was "too tilted". What actually happened was that the launch was delayed, meaning the earth rotated during the time, making the LES think it was tilted. (7k-ok-1)
The Soyuz was also a spacecraft first designed to go to the moon, just like the Apollo of the US. It was supposed to launch on a rocket called the N-1, which had a very awesome (30) amount of engines. It was sadly cancelled due to being outcompeted by the US, and the fact that the godly amount of engines were simply too much for an computer in the 1960s to handle, causing 4 failures.
The Soyuz rocket is also a massive evolution of the rocket that took the first man into space, the Vostok. If you search online for photos, you'll be amazed at how similiar the overall design of the rocket is.
To add to that, if I remember it correctly from our lectures:
3) In case of failure on a return leg, Souz is designed to survive even that. If the descent module fails to separate, joints are designed to "burn through" by heated plasma and release the descent module. There were multiple cases through Soyuz explotation when it happened which caused Soyuz to switch from "controlled" to "ballistic" descent, which is another safety feature.
4) In case of any failure with de-orbit thrusters or at any deorbiting steps, Soyuz can switch from "controlled" descent to "ballistic" mode. There is a safety design in the form and mass distribution of the capsule itself. The form and center of gravity are designed so that oncoming air will flip the vehicle head-shield first even if deorbit or separation have failed. And the mass distribution makes the vehicle deliberately a lit bit of balance, what causes it to spin, what makes "ballistic" re-entry more stable. On the downside, it significantly adds G-load, which can be up to 9g on ballistic re-entry.
and one more thing, the whole rocket is still made of straight (flat) slot screws.
I'm impressed by the zero gravity indicator very simple and highly effective
State of the art technology. I`m impressed !!!
Not only that, legend says: Back in 60"s NASA spent huge amount of money to create or invest in a Space Pen (later also called "Fisher Space Pen") to work in zero gravity, while the Russian since the beginning just used Pencils... lol
(not everything in this story is true, but is funny to see these two ways to solve problems)
@@Soaresbruh That's a myth. Both NASA and Russia started using pencils, but it wasn't ideal. Graphite would break off and get into the ventilation and the wood of a pencil was flammable.
The Fisher Pen Company found out about this and created the Fisher Space Pen to sell to NASA. Today, both NASA and Russia still use it. They cost 6 dollars per pen.
Good ole communism
@@nipcoyote1140 6$ per pen is fine yeah but the R&D took millions
Funny fact: the four supports of the Soyuz rocket are not retracted by hydraulics or some other mechanism. In fact, these are just "swings" that recline with a counterweight when the weight of the rocket disappears at launch. A simple solution that has been working flawlessly for decades
Simpler is better. This will never fail.
Nice
@@srinitaaigauraI mean it might, if somebody forgets to unlock the arms.
A very Soviet solution. The Soviets usually were all about simplicity, no need to make something more complicated (and expensive) than it needs to be.
Como los cofres de un trailer?
This is so beautifully done! I intend to show it to my four year old great grandson who loves space. Last night we took the boys to Chabot Space and Science Center in Oakland, where we saw a reentry vehicle labled CCCP. It was a gift from USSR to NASA. We can play nicely if we try.
Это правда! Успех только в сотрудничестве на равных!
Tell him "soiys" its mean "unity"
the korolev cross is very satisfying in this animation, and even more satisfying in real videos
Yes
Named after Sergei Korolev.
Great video as always Jared! It's so crazy how 16 min can go by so quickly when the animation is that good.
Sir,ur videos are awesome! I like ur in depth explanations with amazing animations. ❤️ from 🇮🇳
This channel became my favourite. Thanks Jared.
Hey Jared - ripper video again. You do amazing work. I'd love to see the Akula Class Submarine (including sauna and pool!), Cheers, Ben
Hey branch education are you a team of people animating or are you a single animator like owen?
Epic
There is also a very interesting ceremony for everyone who travels to space via Russian space ports and space agencies. They are gathered in front of a very special "space travel" book before the flight and their names are entered into this very special register. This book was started by Gagarin, the first human who flew into space providing a continuous historic record since then. The register is kept in the Star City.
There are several more informal space rituals.
When Gagarin drove up to the rocket on the bus, he wanted to take a piss out of excitement. There is nowhere to hide in the desert, and he did it on the back wheel of the bus. Since then, many astronauts, even women, have repeated this ritual)
All cosmonauts also watch a Soviet western on their first day in orbit ... No, eastern "White Sun of the Desert"
@@user-qe1uj7tl6w This sounds like fun :-) Best not to travel on full bladder :) Especially on such long distance journey...
Imagine a situation when someone travels into space having forgotten to pee. And the mission is aborted to screaming crew members "I need to go to the toilet, stop the flight, I am dying to go to pee...." LOL
@@user-qe1uj7tl6w Imagine a situation when someone travels into space having forgotten to pee. And the mission is aborted to screaming crew members "I need to go to the toilet, stop the flight, I am dying to go to pee...." LOL
@@user-qe1uj7tl6w😂🤣😂😅🤣🤣👍👍👍👉💯💯💯
it's crazy how humans have advanced, once we had swords speaking with signs, now we are literally in space, about to explore the entire universe, just... mind blowing
we probably wont explore the universe in the next 10000 years since the fastest you can go (speed of light) isnt avaible to us yet and max speed we have reached is only like 2 percent if i remember correctly, and our own galaxy which is really small considering how big the universe is, is 1000 light years long so not soon 😬
@@ur_babys_hot Our galaxy is 100,000 light years across
@@smasher248 shows even more that i am correct, but thanks for correction
@@ur_babys_hot time dilation
grateful people are a delight.
-"Moscow, we have a problem"
-"Ok. Proceed to use the stick."
😂
@@JaredOwen сейчас в корабль добавили дополнительный выносной пульт командира. Это если он один профи, а остальные - УКП.
i can picture the commander singing the "My stick" song from Bad Lip Reading
😂😂😂😂
@@JaredOwen сними подобное видео про crew dragon
3:23 small innacuraccy, the vernier engines of the core actually line up with the boosters. Thats why the boosters have that cutout, to fit the verniers.
Everything else was amazing, very great work.
Oh look its cardz
Yes I believe your correct! Thanks for the heads up
This is one of those criticisms I enjoy, “hey you got this tiny little thing wrong, here’s how it was wrong, but that mistake doesn’t devalue the rest of the video”
@Author B.L. Alley we in the biz call that "constructive critism"
Small *inaccuracy not innacuraccy, and 5:02 rather than 3:23 corresponds with vernier engines info for me
The amount of engineering and planning put into this is crazy.
Лагорифмическая линейка...
Thousands of research institutes worked on the creation of this rocket. More than a million Soviet citizens of various specialties were involved. This rocket is still the safest rocket for flights to low-Earth orbit in the whole world.
Fun fact: the R7 rocket (family), which Soyuz is a part of, was originally intended for delivering hydrogen bombs. When the R7 was complete, hydrogen bombs had been miniaturized which made the R7 heavily overkill. So the Soviets used it as an orbital launcher for Sputnik.
Since the maiden flight in the 50’s, the R7 family of rockets has the most launches in the world.
Немного корректировки: Сергей Павлович Королёв изначально и собирался делать всё для освоения космоса. А на военном применении настаивало правительство. Королева даже отправляли в ссылку за то, что он больше склоняется в сторону космоса.
@@was5301 ну вы тоже немного неправы. Не в ссылку, а на Колыму, в ГУЛАГ, подыхать на золотом руднике. А сделать ракету под видом военной ракеты космическую - это было потом.
@@ivan2nem912 Да вы я посмотрю лингвист прямо. А чем понятие «ссылка»отличается от Колымы и ГУЛАГА? В общем значении конечно.
Сразу видно в вас либеральное нутро, при каждом удобном случае трындеть запатентованные название Колыма и Гулаг. )))
Как видите Королев очень даже не умер и далеко не только он один.
What are you writing for? And the purpose of the cargo compartment of the Space Shuttle by the Americans is still classified. Intended, among other things, for a bomb load. And now, the Americans are testing the Boeing X-37. who has a military appointment.
It was a Cold war, when both countries made everything to be number 1, especially in a new area as Space was.
I have seen how several Russian soldiers and techs come to help the ISS crews when they come back to earth. It doesn't matter if the astronauts are American, french or Italian.
I wish one day the governments of the world understand that together we can be stronger, better and happier.
That is just because the Baikonur cosmodrome still operated by Russian military, if I'm not mistaken.
N. Ramos@ Exactly!
вместе мы можем быть сильнее, лучше и счастливее.
as long as there is something to compete about, the governments will. there's just no way there could be actual governmental utopia achieved.
Even if most of the governments come to an agreement, it would be unbearably hard to decide - how is it to be happier? Atheistic, Christian that way, Christian this way, or maybe Islamic?
The interasting fact - The four truss legs shown at 8:20 minutes hold the rocket without motors. The rocket is placed on the bed of these supports , and under the center of gravity, the supports move inward, pressing the rocket and hold the rocket on vertical pozition . And when the rocket starts to take off, the weight on the support decreases and the supports open automatically .
Как раз думал, а что если одна из опор не сдвинется. Вот оно как, всё гениальное - просто.
Let's appreciate the fact that this guy has enough motivation to do this
5:51 The escape tower was used once: during the Soyuz T-10-1 mission. The rocket was sitting on the launchpad when there was a fire caused by a malfunctioning pump. The escape tower was triggered and the crew was launched 6 seconds before the rocket exploded.
11 october 2018 it also saved crew when rocket was high enough. MC-10 mission
@@user-my8hz3hf6c
The tower had already been jettisoned at that point, it was the escape motors on the launch shroud that pulled the capsule away.
Приветствую, вы ошибаетесь. Система аварийного спасения работала довольно много раз, на разных ракетах в беспилотных, тестовых запусках. Союз/Протон/Н1, всё нештатные и аварийные ситуации система отработала полностью.
Если говорить о пилотируемых миссиях то я предложу вам ознакомиться с этим списком :
Союз-18А 1975 год - сбой работы второй ступени, аварийное приземление в Горный Алтай. Космонавты спасены. Перегрузка достигала 20g
Союз т10 1 1983 год, как вы упомянули.
До старта ракеты, за 2 секунды перед взрывом увела капсулу с космонавтами , перегрузка достигала 16 g. Космонавты спасены.
Союз МС 10 2018 год. Известный всём случай. Аварийная ситуация при разделений 1й ступени на 165 секунду. Космонавты спасены.
Dude you do the most detailed and interesting presentations and animations you really have a talent and you need more love for this channel so if you guys have not subscribed you should it's worth it
Thanks Sashin
If I were going to space, I would insist on using the Soyuz. The Russians have perfected this system over several decades, and it has proven itself to be extremely reliable. I lift my hat to those Russian engineers who developed such a trustworthy system.
100%!!!
👏👏👏
Agreed! What a smart design. Respect to the Russian people.
Except from now on, the Russians now will rely on Spacex to send their cosmonauts to ISS.
@@sfguzmani desde cuando?
I came here to watch the Russian rocket launch especially lift-off, as I've always admired the way it looks so simple yet elegant, with its different colored boosters and flames but I got to see something impressive than I had imagined. The level of detail and precision that goes into every aspect of a space flight is truly awe-inspiring. I now understand why we say "it's not rocket science" to mean that something is not as complicated as it may seem. A great deal of thought and planning goes into every step of a space flight and it is a testament to the ingenuity and dedication of the people who make it all possible. I salute the great minds behind this. Further more silly , I always used think why the inner side of boosters were painted to red knowingly that they will get evaporated ?? but I have the answer for that too. Thanks for such an amazing content, very well presented with detailed animations and Kudos to efforts put into this.
Amazing, as always. Btw I would absolutely love to see a video on the JWST, especially since it’s finally near launch!
First of all, absolutely phenomenal CAD/animation work, Jared. I’m so fascinated to see the difference and similarity of the Russian space program, who have been at it longer than anyone on earth. Despite basics dictated by the mission and physics, I can see that the Russians have developed some interesting advantages, such as ground landings and multi-engine configurations. Our work together is humankind’s signature achievement, risking life and treasure together on a job bigger than either nation can do alone, and this with each other’s staunchest political enemy. I wonder if this irony is really appreciated enough. Enemies on earth, closest of friends in space.
Russia is not an enemy.
@@aur485 ...
If I understood correctly, the Russians did not spoil anything. They did the smartest thing so that the system works to this day, not disintegrating and rumbling shuttles. Russia and the USА in the mainstream are enemies, but the truth is different.
Шикарное видео, просто и понятно. Спасибо. Даже первод включать не пришлось, хватило моего скудного английского и графики👍👍👍
Just imagine what humanity would have achieved if it had united! But instead, we are constantly waging a senseless struggle with each other and destroying our planet.
6:05 the most critical part is missing. Before cosmonauts get into the Soyuz they all piss at the bus's wheel. It's a must.
I love these videos, so interesting. You're the only youtuber who i actually wait to upload more videos :)
Thanks Bob - I know I take a lot longer than most youtubers
@@JaredOwen Yup actually You worked hard in the animation
So it is always time consuming...
That's why you create magic
@@JaredOwen It definitely takes a LOT of time... making a 3D animation in itself is a time taking job! but , making something related to space! My god that's time taking. But your efforts are worth it sir. It helps us appreciate the hard work of engineers and the extent to which humans have figured out science! And not to forget, it helps us learn. Thank You :)
@@JaredOwen I concur, this video was really awesome
I was anxious for this video's release, your hard work surely was worth it! Congrats!
By the way, some random fact: The first (and still yet, the only) Brazilian astronaut/cosmonaut Marcos Pontes got to the ISS in a Soyuz Mission!
The event was known here in Brazil as Missão Centenário (Centenary Mission), and internationally as the Soyuz TMA-8.
The mission got it's name (in Portuguese) as a tribute to the centenary anniversary of the 14-bis flight by Santos Dumont.
The mission also had the crew of the american astronaut Jeffrey Willians and the russian cosmonaut Pavel Vinogradov.
Excellent work Jared!
Thank you so much for creating this video.
I always been fascinated by the soyuz as its really is a interesting machine I believe my favorite part of it is the fact it has its own solar panels and in a way has all the hall marks of a those old school science fiction spaceships a truely respectable piece of engineering
Отличная работа, Jared!
Privet Russian person
Привет, ты из России?
@@sebastiandomingos335 no
@@AQ-101 not you
@@sebastiandomingos335 oh I confused you for the commentor sorry
Finally! The Soyuz animation is here! I’ve been waiting for this for a WHILEEEE now!
I absolutely love the use of a train.
Great video! I have just a little remark to add: once in mid 70's the soyuz capsule "managed to land" on a lake due to some technical issues... so not only the NASA modules land on water... 😁
This is an excellent descriptive animation - and it answered a number of queries I've had for years but have NEVER seen described elsewhere. Great job, Well Done!
BRILLIANT!!! Jared - The best part is the crew entry into the rocket (at 6:33 min) - this is the best explanation I have ever seen of the crew access
Jared, your space videos are fantastic, I just happen to enjoy the space stuff the most, excellent work doing this for us.
Would/could you do one perhaps covering the Apollo space missions in particular one where the Lunar Rover is concerned, would be great to see the workings on the surface of the moon, flight stowage and deployment.
Many, many thanks
Regards
Mark.
3:08 on the middle booster the little nozzles coming off of it, are supposed to be in line with the side boosters.
The little nozzles I’m referring to are the Vernier engines
only took me 60 years to see how a mission is preformed, well done
53 years to me.
I never miss Jared’s animations. So much to learn.
Doesn't SpaceX also put together their Falcon 9 rockets in the horizontal position, and then raise them into the vertical launch position as well? That's what I've been toldd by a tour guide while on a bus tour of one of the launch sites they use which is the Kennedy Space Center
yeah
Amazing video as always Jared! Somehow I missed this one in my subscription feed XD I'm usually always on top of your stuff. But fantastic explanations and animation!! You always impress me with your work. Also, congrats on 2 Million subscribers!!! Huge milestone for ya! Looking forward to your next video, and outstanding work as always :D
I feel like the Soyuz spacecraft is the most reliable and useful spacecraft ever built
the fact that the command module is in the middle and not on the top add another layer of safety. I think it was well designed with safety in mind. Love that the command pilot have to use a stick to poke some command. and the g indicator.... They are so russian :D
@@TakumiFujiwara80 That G indicator has additional function, for another stress relieving alongside the music :D
@@TakumiFujiwara80 yes, the stick is good device
It's not you feel like but it's known to be the most reliable rocket engines ever built by Man and the narrator said so in the other video
Could it be bcoz no other country has been this good for decades and is the only place nasa can go to for help?
The earth globe looks like Terravision. Thats great because Google can't claim it.
The Soyuz rocket was first launched in 1966, and the Saturn V rocket was first launched in 1967. Sergei Korolev was the chief designer of the Soyuz rocket. It is amazing that the Soyuz rocket is still in use today.
You couldn’t have done it better !!!!! I just 3D printed a 50 inch Soyuz that’s why I wanted to see all details ….. I am super happy with your amazing video. Thx
First of all: Great video as always.
Secondly: One has to love the ingenuity of Russian Space Engineering.
Can't reach the controls?
*Use a stick.*
Need an indicator for weightlessness?
*Stuff Toy on a String it is.*
Great solutions to engineering problems😋
Even the 4 supports to hold the rocket down are without any control, they hold it just by it's own weight, once the rocket starts going up it permits them to release the rocket itself.
Also, while NASA was working on making the pressurized Space Pen, the Russians just used pencils to make notes...
@@emkkahn That's true, however the Russians *did switch* to the "Space Pen" once it was available since granite residue can be really hazardous in a Micro-G environment.
@@emkkahn Yeah, but the pencils weren't regular pencils, they were weird wax crayon-like ones, as graphite & wood shavings would get into & damage electronics in 0g. Because of this they... kinda sucked. At writing. :/
Dear Jared: I keep loving your videos and I'm amazed by the improving quality of each release. Thank you very much for your work.
Great video Jared! How long does it take you to do the research, writing, modeling, animating, rendering, and final comp work for one of these? Do you do it all yourself? Stellar work!
This is AWESOME. Thank you for preparing this great animation.
Just wanted to thank you for your amazing educational videos. Our 4 year old has been demanding your videos daily for the last year. We learn alongside him and its unbelievable to see him enjoy learning and retain the info and use it in his play later. Thank you! 🥰
Love these ones about the different spacecraft, their rockets and the ISS. Really good stuff Jared!
This was just so incredibly well done! Thank you for the effort you put into this.
7:49 my dentist also plays music to try and relax me before he drills. I can speak from experience when I tell you NO AMOUNT of music can negate the terror that his drill's high-pitched sound invokes 😮
Yay Another animation video by my favorite YT channel! These are highly detailed and very researched through of what goes when and which part is named. I can't wait for this channel to grow so BIG that we could enjoy these unique videos such as this one a bit more often. What an amazing one person job, thank you Jared Owen for your hard work!
Thanks Kirill
Staying 2 hours inside a metal tube seems scary, imagine needing to pee lol
The space suits have devices to collect urine. Plus, didn't your parents tell you to go before you left?
Idk but I certainly can’t hold it for 2 whole hours
Перед полетом не мог что-ли сходить в туалет?! Вот теперь сиди и терпи)
The design of the Soyuz rocket looks very similar to the Alterna Rocket in Splatoon 3.
Хорошая анимация. Смотрится на "одном дыхании" как говорят в России. Но можно было бы рассказать и о том, что "Союз" не просто падает, а спускается по особой траектории, чтобы снизить перегрузки.
А ещё про разные витковые схемы
We having a saying for that, "Falling with style" Cheers from the USA
Вот Рикардо ди Пиетро выше и рассказал.
Questions: 1) what are those red cone engine nozzle inserts protecting against? 2) At what velocity is the craft going when it actually hits the ground?
answer for q1 is probably other oxidizing gasses and dust
My guess for Q1 is protection from anything that could enter the engine. Like birds, dirt/dust. Insects etc. It is like the "remove before flight" protective caps for airplanes when they are stored.
the answer for question 2 is they turn into a damn pancake
@@ExtremusStupidus nope its 30 m/s
@@prolska 30? Jesus Christ thats fast
I'm sure it's a lot more intricate behind-the-scenes, but I love how simple and effective this rocket is to an outside observer (me)
I absolutely love the position of the res protective coverings
Awesome video! Just a little commentary for comparison with other rockets: The Russians use a different stage numbering system than the rest of the world. In the US, the Soyuz would be considered a 2 or 2.5 stage rocket. The boosters aren't counted as a stage separate from the core because they all fire at the same time. So the core is considered the first stage, the upper stage is the 2nd stage, and the boosters are boosters, sometimes considered a half stage, so 2 or 2.5 stages under that criteria, not 3. The Space Shuttle, for example, was considered a 1.5 stage rocket in the US, the main stage and a half stage for the boosters. Meanwhile, the Russians would've considered it a 2 stage rocket (that's how they counted the Buran). So, what the Russians call 3rd stage MECO would've been called SECO in the US.
Another detail, you mention that the LES has saved lives a few more times, which is correct, but not on flight. The launch you mentioned, MS-10, was actually the very first time a LES had actually activated with astronauts in flight ever, not just on Soyuz but on any spacecraft. Besides that, the LES had only been used on Soyuz twice before, on one occasion, fire on the rocket, LES activated, and one after a rocket launch aborted, and while the rocket was being safed, the third stage pyros activated, killing a pad worker and setting off the LES.
The Soyus is a beautiful rocket on the world.
Actually you are wrong, MS-10 didn't use the LES. LES is jettisoned few seconds before the boosters. So by the time that one booster failed to separate LES was already gone. At that point Soyuz spacecraft leaves the rocket using inertia and not an LES.
@@Thillith No, you are wrong. The Soyuz LES is not composed of just the tower. All the way up to booster separation, Soyuz would use the LES tower. After the tower is jettisoned, it retains a smaller part of the LES, composed of 4 RDG motors that are hidden in the fairing.
The two stages that are blowing up right below you have just as much inertia as your capsule, and you don't want to hang out there for the explosion. The RDGs have less thrust and overall delta-v than the tower, but that isn't necessary at that point. The tower is needed before precisely because the boosters offer a lot of thrust, and the RDGs alone wouldn't be enough to pull away the capsule fast and far enough.
MS-10 was pulled away by the LES, specifically by the RDGs.
6:07
the bus driver : *drifting*
*THIS VIDEO IS FANTASTIC!!!* Well done once again, Jared! Incredibly informative and entertaining! ...I need to play KSP now...!
7:58 nice little landing stand/leg there for
Those arms
Great Jared! Fantastic work.
It would be good an animation about an old space station like MIR, Saljut or Skylab
I agree! I see what I can do about future space station animations😀
@@JaredOwen ah, I've got another idea: an animation about Perseverance Rover 😁
We always appreciate you Jared for the great work of opening our minds on the abstract side of Life.
I request you to animate Tottenham Hotspurs' stadium in England. I wanna its mechanism of changing its turf
amazing video bro. thanks
Such detail and such elegantly made. Thanks fort the clarity.
Soyuz is a legendary rocket and one of my favourite
Is the beautiful rocket on the world. Gonglatulations!
@@cicerocivalecar7601 No for me the most beautiful one is Spacex Starship
Mine too!
Russian using train to transport rocket
American: *b i g t r u c k*
Technically: B I G T R E A D E D V E H I C L E
US: we’ll build an instrument connected to an accelerometer to precisely measure the g-forces exerted by the-
Russia: just hang a beanie baby on a string
Everything ingenious is simple)
Pls make next animation on India's Gaganyaan crew spacecraft
Хорошее качественное видео. Автору респект, очень много фактологии и всё в доступной форме, а это важно когда речь идёт о таком сложном процессе как космический полет.
? I don't speak Russian
Because Russia is invading Ukraine
@@gabyraphycambranes472 хаха
Another masterpiece 😍 thanks a ton for sharing this video ❤️❤️❤️
Man I cant believe how much time must habe been needed for all that details and animations.
Where do you get the models from, though?
Greetings from Russia! What a lovely video, idea and animation. Such video must be shown at school, instead of boring lessons with old fashioned books from previous century. I noticed, that even word "СОЮЗ" is written on the rocket, while assembling in horisontal position :-)
Waiting for a new gorgeous videos!
13:43 The parachute cover is supposed to fly upwards in relation the the Soyuz capsule, because it is much lighter and a lower terminal velocity.
ahh good point!
I like the journey of Soyuz spacecraft that's amazing! thank you so much for such awesome animated video.I feel like I'm on a journey with the spacecraft while I watching the video.
Glad you liked it!
9:40 I've read that firing of the upper stage whilst the first is still attached is called 'Fire in the hole'. Ensuring that the fuel is forced back towards the engines is called ullage. Saturn had specific engines that fired for that purpose.
5:37 i thiks 'rocket motors' is the suitable term since the launch escape system uses solid fuel and doesn't require an engine
fantastic work once again Jared! :D
Better explained than my aerospace teacher! Amazing video :)
Great analysis of the launch! And excellent graphics! Thanks for sharing! Greetings from Portugal
It’s good to see how different countries work together. I hope in near future this kind of cooperation will be here on Earth. Good animation
13:00 during Re-Entry, of course the astronauts (or cosmonauts) experience 4G during this part of the decent, if the thrusters (automatic systems) fail, they can either use a backup controller or the steeper ballistic decent, during a ballistic decent, the G load increases to 9! I think that’s more than what a fighter pilot pulls, but imagine doing the Ballistic decent when you have been up without gravity for 6 months.
9G is right up at the top of what a Fighter pilot can do, and most of them couldn't withstand that for the length of time they'd experiance it in this case. Airshow/demonstration pilots would be under strain even.
@@DFX2KXty for letting me know! :)
I’ve been watching the more in depth videos about the soyuz launch, rendezvous / docking, and the landing before Jared’s videos were posted, it’s so fascinating to learn about new things! I’m very curious
Would love to se your take on...
- How does a solar panel work?
- How does a waterjet work?
also sls (sadly there only 2 sls launched)
6:51
At exactly THIS moment I would seriously get anxious about all this lmao
if I was going to space, I would prefer to be transported to the launch site in a hot pink bus
Самое крутое и подробное видео об этом корабле и ракете, что я когда-либо видел. Огромное спасибо автору!
Несогласен, очень много чего тут сделано либо очень неточно, с упущением важных деталей, либо вообще неправильно :)
@@HNN_CBEPXCNCTEM_CCCP_NM._COBbl например?
Hey! I noticed that the caption has a mistake at 12:08 “Hohmann Transfer” is mistakenly captioned “home and transfer”
Ahh good catch, I will fix that
You forgot about the tradition of peeing on the bus tire for good luck. I can't remember who did it first.
09:46 is called “Hot Staging” that is why on the 2nd stage there is a ring with holes on top
Also the Launch shroud can work as a payload fairing as well
This vid is so awesome, I can't wait for ur next vid:D
I love these kinds of videos
😀
Great video! But during reentry, there's heat but no fire :p only plasma! Its not coz of the friction, it's coz of pressure! Basically, an object (capsule) slams air so hard air can't escape fast enough to the side and as more and more air is slammed onto, in this case heat shied, the pressure rises immensely and thats what creates the plasma and the heat. There's no fire :)
Thanks the feedback!
Fire is plasma.
@@tyrannosaurusimperator Fire is usually used when something combusts creating said heat/plasma. The pressure alone creating the heat wouldn't *technically* be fire except maybe on the micro level with anything in the atmosphere/stratospheric (but I'm realistically using a vacuum)
Its easy to see how it could be considered fire though
Amazing video, I love it! One small remark - if we would like to be correct in metric system units it should written as 1670 km/h (not "1670kph"). Kph is the imperial way of writing metric units.
3:11 did anybody realize the scene after had the rocket flip directions entirely?
I did
13:22 Fire and heat can't of course prevent radiosignals from coming through. It is the plasma that builds up due to the heat. Currently there are systems in development to overcome this problem.
The reentry isnt fire its a very hot gas
@@chabveasna8400 Plasma is technically not a gas, but a forth state of matter. That's the whole point. Plasma is ions and thus disturbs radio connection, gas isn't.
And the flames we usually call the fire are actually hot gas.
Can’t wait for the Soyuz vs Starship, if Russia keeps using it
Ofcourse they keep using it. If it isn't broke dont fix it.
Ofcourse
we have verified guy
Yes. Yes. Yes.
I think starship is much better
“The zero-g indicator will begin to float and the crew members will feel weightless for the first time” -Jared Owen
Me: what if they already went to space, especially the commander
True...it might not be their first time
Awesome video gettin to learn new space mission
Thanks Jared to explain soyuz spacecraft and Soyuz rocket