What are your thoughts on these predictions? EDIT: People pointed out that I contradicted myself with Elpy and Isolde, my apologies about that! I just now realized that, and you're totally right! Isolde can get banned too, or neither gets hit and instead these variants of dragons and warriors will get hit in different ways!
Perfect if we had events. But they can't really hit cards released this year as people haven't gotten to play tbe of Linkross and Sanguine at all. I think you could hit Marcher instead of Kross. Definitely not ideal but I think Konami should respect its consumers
Pretty good list, although hitting quicklaunch and sanguine is to much IMO, chaos space sure because Its more busted. Calamities needs to go as Its azathots little brother, and I dont think It wil hurt VW. Also I think you missed zexal :0 . Anyways, love the videos!
@@miguelnunez3094 I think if you hit Elpy that would be enough for now. See Zexal is degenerate but people kinda banned it themselves by not playing the card.
Everything made sense in this video except sanguine to 2. Eldlich is not a problem at all, the deck is completely fair and actually balances the game. Without eldlich top tier play will be almost 100% combo. Eldlich doesn’t hand rip, doesn’t domain lock, and doesn’t even put up negates. Why would we hit eldlich?
I whole heartedly disagree he basically almost said make dragon link unplayable and lightly touch infernoble like linkcross and buster is the only hits dragon link needs to make the deck fair imo it will be more susceptible to hand traps and only put up like 2 or 3 negates which is not hard to play through if you bait properly Vfd needs to go its much hard to play through a floodgate that can dodge targeting and makes it so your opponent cannot even get a game state started and its not even dedicated like zexal is when most of the time it will be the only thing on the field compared to vfd getting backed up by other monsters and backrow
@@WhyPhoenix Dude. If banning a link 1 monster that can specail any dragon extender from deck and banning a card like the buster lock that doesnt allow your opponent to play ruins your deck you should find another deck
There is a trend i keep seeing with these prediction videos from multiple yugitubers. *they don't mention MYSTIC MINE* Day 228 of waiting for Vendread support
@@lampsonmcstand6150 lol I will never understand how mystic mine is allowed but not skill drain we don't need mystic mine its too polarizing of a card skill drain needs to be at 3 Nd mystic needs be at 1 or banned
Is any relevant deck even using mine? Typically for floodgates to be banned. it literally has to warp the format drastically similar to vanity emptiness, oppression etc.. It has to be played in nearly every deck, for Konami to hit it. Atleast that has been the pattern. Mine is broken don't get me wrong but it's not making the format toxic like needlfiber and other combo engines are being thrown in every deck.
@@JDBass36 i see what you mean but that's mostly player choice and there are still people topping with mystic mine burn like mystic mine has terrible card design their are better floodgates thag are reasonable and still interactive
True king of all calamities healthy... good one. Also cards that say you cannot activate card effects are pretty fucking unfair in genral so zexal should be too . Hot red dragon archfiend one is pretty hard to summon so MAYBE JUST MAYBE it can stay but the others are super easy to summon
The issues I have with Zexal: -3 or 4 monsters on board off rip(they can easily +1 or 2 at least) -can dodge ash(if they open good) and nibiru -is a splashable engine(Dragoon/Zexal is wosrt case scenario) -S0 in general(needs to be ban) -They have room for handtraps(especially more pure variants)
He said that VW was healthy. I can see what he means. VW locks you into synchro and XYZ if you want to actually play the deck and combo. Aside from calamities, they do not put up boards with multiple negates and they cant lock you out your extra deck. Calamities is essentially their only “you can’t play” win condition. They are play through hand traps as well, but not to the extent of the other decks. They have good recursion, and extenders, but the graveyard effects cost banishing. They have good grind game which is fair. The other decks have halqui, linkross, auroradon and their other extenders to and basically utilize almost all the meta summing mechanics, save for the xyz that only VW relies on. I think VFD should be banned, but putting it to one does force them to go a different route Once it is countered.
I don't think Elpy should get banned if we ban the extra deck lock. Dragon Link is fine as long as they don't get to set up 3 interruptions + the ED lock
Personally I'd rather Smoke Grenade and Buster Lock get hit instead of Elpy and Isolde, get rid of the completely unfair cards and then let's see how the decks shake out.
That's probably how it will turn out, but people like to make crazy speculations. Just hit Smoke, Dragon Buster and VFD and we have a much much healthier format
Ok so there is one problem I'm seeing here: if you hit combo decks too much I could see Dragoon getting way more popular because the format will be slower.
Dragoon is OP as fuck but with all of the new decks will most likely side or main cards like Darkruler No more or stuff that can handle Dragoon. It wont get banned yet but give it time until a lot of decks abuse it.
Fair. TBH though, idk how insane it would be. The problem is Zoo now has Zeus, and if zoo is the most popular control deck then Zeus will be a super easy out to dragoon. Not saying Dragoon is bad by any means, but more so I think for the time being it should be manageable.
@@BladeYGO sure there are outs but Dragoon is just too damn easy to make and nearly every deck can run it. That's what's really degenerate about it imo.
@@LexAnarchy Wrong, dragoon itself is strong but the card that make that engine splashable everywhere is verte anaconda. Try putting out dragoon consistently without verte and let me know how that goes
I 100% agree with your opinion on Halq. It's an amazing card but Linkcross is the main issue, at least at the moment. If dino does get hit, I think semi is fine, going to 1 straight away seems a little harsh, but that's just me haha.
Misc to 1 will not kill Dino because it has Archosaur and they can replace the 2 misc with different Dino monsters or cards Archosaur can search easily.
@@WhyPhoenix Dinos are tier 2, there's literally *one* Dino deck in the LCS top 16, they used to be meta bc of their good match up against dlink and combo players didn't knew how to play against them
Harp horror to 1 yes it will make orcust tier 1 again but still It won't be as insane as it used to be plus orcust isn't good anymore so I think bringing back harp horror is a good idea and could help orcust be tier 1 again
banning elpy and not isolde is blatant bias, the cards are about equally powerful, and isolde has arguably been used in more degenerate combos then elpy
You neutered Dragon Link so hard and all you did to Infernoble was Linkross and Smoke Grenade. That's just wrong. I think VFD should get banned, not limited. Sanguine to 2 is a really interesting hit I haven't seen before and I like that.
Same thing I said basically gave the deck a vasectomy like just ban linkcross and buster whelp then all dragon link is a deck that can put of 2 negates and play through hand traps and ash a chaos space fucking hurts cause you going neg 1 off rip 2 cards to search one no reason for that to get hit
Linkross and smoke grenade are the only things that need to be hit for infernoble really, without linkross it gets destroyed by nib or a negate on needle potentially keeps them away from auradon, unless you open gearfried, and no smoke grenade makes their board very breakable because going second cards are viable again, the only thing they could go harder on is connector to 1 or dolphine banned, I wouldnt mind that also as dolphin is a very degenerate card Dragon link definately deserves buster, linkross and elpy banned though, the deck is far too resilient to hand traps for a board that's way too good for such little investment, after that combo will be chilled out for the most part which I feel everyone is dying for to happen, the game has been straight combo aids since spyral and then adimancipator
Vfd should definitely just be banned also, no reason for it to be around any longer, virtual world is a fine deck even without it, it doesnt need the auto win button that should have been banned for so long now, I will say though if we can stop building our decks to beat combo vfd becomes a lot easier to deal with when you can afford to play nice cards And sanguine to 2 is just.. dumb. Eldlich is not even that good, there's no reason to hit it at all
@@FrieginGoodVanguard there is no reason to 5 hit components of a deck like without linkcross and buster lock how oppressive is dragon link the worst think about dragon link is buster lock being backed up by 2 negates that's not hard to play through hitting linkcross and buster lock is best thing there too many answers to elpy ash,Impermanence,veiler,forbidden drop etc
@@FrieginGoodVanguard and combo is not unhealthy its just they can be obscenely resilient and dragon link without linkcross and buster lock is not hard to play against especially when you can use your extra deck
Aa for the dragon link hits... Chaos space probably won't get touched... Quick launch also probably not as its only playable in 1 deck which at the moment only plays like 4 rokkets anyway.. sanguine at 2 .. maybe but it'll get replaced with a black awakening so leaving it at 3 or putting it to 2 would do the same thing
What I predict: BANNED: True King of All Calamities, Elpy, Isolde, Smoke Grenade, Linkross or Halqfibrax, and maybe Herald of the arc-light if they don't ban either of those two LIMITED: Miscellaneousaurus, Oviraptor, TD Colussus, Quick-Launch SEMI-LIMITED: No idea sorry OFF THE LIST: Either Gazelle or Circle, Red Rebbot, Toadally Awesome, ABC-Dragon Buster, Infernity Archfiend and Card of Demise
If you ban Isolde or elpy there is no point in banning smoke grenade we can’t get to that anyway. Also your banned section is way to strong. Your ruining those decks, banlist are to control the meta not murder it
@@SnivyTeamLeader Misc to one makes sense. Ovi is fine is misc is at one. Card of Demise to 3 scares me and I don't think salads need gaz or circle to anything more than 1. Already consistent without being hyperconsistent. I like the Quick-Launch Idea though.
I would've liked to see you discuss 1 or 2 cards you'd like to see get off the ban list or move to limited/semi-limited, cause I think that's usually a really interesting thing to discuss or think about. For the most part, I agree with the entirety of everything. Smoke Grenade is the one card I've really hated this format, and I hope Buster goes peace with it as well.
I personally wouldn't want Elpy banned as a dragon player but I do agree it is a powerful card and should be looked at HOWEVER, I hope you can see that the arguments you used for not hitting Isolde can equally apply to Elpy as Dragon is also a fan favourite type with tons of d support and would help future dragon decks
Completely agree with the take on Buster and Smoke Grenade. People get too caught up in the idea of "JuSt HiT tHe EnAblers". The simple fact is, without smoke grenade the infernoble board is manageable. Instead of getting rid of every combo enabler, which in my mind is just a waste of time(while also just leaving decks in the dregs of playability), just get rid of the actual issue. Especially cards like those which will never be playable in a fashion which *isn't* unhealthy for the game.
Tbh hitting Oviraptor to 1 would be better than hitting misc imo, it’s hits their consistency but still lets the deck be powerful through misc and it’s other tools
I understand why people would look to quick launch but its archetype exclusive, dragon links are just very generic and rokkets have the best tools for it. As for chaos space, I think it's a bit early, destruction sword and linkcross should get hit for sure, both are degenerate and sword has been around a while
Exaclty linkcross and dragon buster is the only thing that needs to go then dragon link will be like 1.5 consistent deck that makes 2 to 3 negates and isn't as good at going second
@@WhyPhoenix i agree, smoke grenade could be banned for infernoble, but it could also be limited although its easy for them to access so I'd say ban the card that's been around for years and only sees play now, its almost delinquent duo in power, and if you can use 3, you can resolve ALL THREE... potentially
@@christopheraponte306 exactly i think it should be banned or limited but they thing its its not random it gives you hand info and what you are playing and even without infernoble is still a good deck I think we need less of all these blowout cards and have a bunch of decks at a good amount of power so they can all clash and so the meta can be entertaining and creative
@@WhyPhoenix generic cards should be strong, but they should be limited a bit, heavier costs, hard OPT clauses, and looking at hands is a bit OP, except on traps really because you have to wait a turn, in all other cases it should be randomized, which allows you a chance at hitting a card that would harm your plays or just hit a dead card and make their hand live, adds to the thrill and fun in that regard. Appointer is a good example, mind crush was unfortunate and viruses have fair costs which limits their use in most decks
Every card limited to 1, unless a different card calls for a specific card by original printed name, at 2 or 3, for summoning requirements or full effect completion.
Hah, you forgot one counter point that could destroy your Elpy ban prediction: Elpy is a good boi and we Dragon players love it. Edit: Halq and and Linkross have to go though.
Sorry mate but fuck guardragons. They broke what dragons could already do and pushed them to infinity. I’m tired of having to mess up my deck building with a bunch of hand traps and pray I draw 2+ and even then I’ve seen good pilots ignore what I did and go ham.. like ash blossom , imperm and Nibiru.. and still went off. It’s silly.
I think most of these are accurate, though personally I think the eldlitch one is a bit of a stretch. I get the control check, but given how it's been a combo format, I think it's expected only combo decks will get real hit.
I don't think Chaos Space or Sanguine should be hit in any way. I think the healthy thing is to always hit once the problem arises.The fact Sanguine made trap decks viable again, like we needed that tbh. Other than that I agree with all the hits you mentioned. However, I do think that if they wanna keep Halq, then can they hit Linkross & Auroradon. Since Halq+Deskbot Engine+Aurardon can end on multiple negate boards.
Kross will go eventually but hasn't seen a single real event yet and if they didn't hit Called, especially before Designator is out, then get rid or Kross and Calamities and Dinos are quite fair. Hitting Scarlet seems excessive now that Eldlich has been power crept hard but a semi isn't that bad. Just my thoughts on the list.
Ban: *Linkross*(tbh I think they could just errata it to use Cyberse link monsters as material and it would fall out of the meta but they won't do that) *Buster Welp* (or maybe errata it to only work with Buster Blader) *Smoke Grenade*(ripping cards is unfair) or maybe Isolde instead. I don't see them hitting both though. *True King of All Calamities*(just....no) If they don't ban Linkross, maybe ban Martial Metal Marcher? *Elpy*(too good of an extender being able to summon one from the deck, long time coming) Limit *Misc* Bring *Thunder Dragon Collosus* back to 1, maybe Harp Horror too. Maybe an Eldlich card? Semi *Called by the Grave* Unlimit *ABC Dragon Buster* *Toadally Awesome*
Isnt dragunity support coming out relatively soon? The kept eply in the game for so long, banning it now that were this close to it seems kinda weird to me. Also banning linkross would mean making a statement that konami has been desperately trying to avoid making: cards you buy can get banned before u'll ever have a chance to play them irl. They kinda dodged they issue last list by hitting old cards like block dragon or jet. Imo this banlist they'll pull smth similar by hitting a couple of old yet really strong cards like smoke, buster and maybe calamities? But that'll be it.
A suggestion for nerfing dinosaurs: why not ban/limit Ultimate Conductor? It’s their boss monster, so why not see what else they can make instead of it?
You do realize that dinos are not very good at combo right? Its not like they just just turbo out Savage + Dragoon naturally. Skyhawk has made some combo dino decks. But you don't see those in tournament for a reason. Cutting UCT would pretty much kill the deck. The only other option VFD turbo. And i don't think people want another VFD turbo deck.
Also because metalfoes are actually getting new Support soon, and what better way to promote the new Support than by getting metalfoes best link monster off the banlist. It's a strong possibility, cause Konami did the same thing for phantom knights by getting rusty off the banlist to promote the new Phantom knight Support
@@jestersol7100 uhh yeah they can make a link monster for every pendulum archetype. They forced pendulums to have to play Links so it would only make sense to release links for pendulum archetypes. Electrumite only leads to pendulum.deks where you play the best stack of pendulum cards to make massive turn 1 boards.
elpy is definetly worth a consideration but tbh i dont think it would even hurt the dragon deck much. banning romulus for example (especially if cross is banned too) they would lose alot more consistency than by losing elpy, because in the end you just use elpy for redmd or brotaur to get 1 extra ressource. without elpy dragons still have almost all of their insane plays.
Isolde helps my casual warrior decks so I really hope it doesn’t get banned. Same with elpy but there are so many options to use for extenders and searchers for a lot of my dragon decks
I agree with that although e tele is generic psychics and quick launch only apply to rokkets but I think e tele should be at 3 makes deck building more fun and more people will explore the meta and plus ash is a thing
Dragon buster destruction sword is not fair, because I dont know what is the backrow, but dont touch union carrier and dont touch my extra deck full deniers 😭
dragon buster destruction sword was not the problematic card union carrier is what made it the problem card ban union stop dragon buster destruction sword from being able to extra deck lock outside of its archetype.
So i dont think youre wrong on any of your points imo. I just believe that Konami will keep the list relatively small and more than likely bring cards back off the list. I think Smoke Grenade and Buster Whelp are likely bans. I dont see them banning Linkross yet... unfortunately. I think youre reasoning on Calamities correct. I do think that a limit to Calamities is a appropriate. I personally would rather see the Fossil Dig to 1 than Misc right now. (Fossil dig is a not opt rota) and this will still limit how much they see Misc in their opening hands but still leave dinos strong and also open up how they can make dinosaur archetypes in the future. I honestly doubt anymore hits will happen with no real life events :( i think Cir and Graff will probably come off the list. Im not an advocate for it but Electrumite might come off the list. I could see Infernity Archfiend coming off the list. I definitely see Buster and Toad coming off the list. I could also see E-Tele coming to 2 but thats risky imo. Those are my thoughts
I disagree with destruction sword. Not because I think it's fun to get locked out of your extra deck but because I think Union carrier is the problem. The card is, just like Halq, Isolde and Linkross stupidly generic for no reason but it can create future problem along the line, whereas a card like destruction sword, which is limited to it's Archetye wouldn't be as prone to creating more degeneracy. And well just just kind of stupid that a card for a fun-ish Archetpe has to get hit just because Union carrier exists. TL;DR: I disagree because I do not like generic ( mainly extra deck ) cards in yugioh
Blade: Ban Elpy, but keep isolde cus she promotes playing warriors, one of the most popular types Elpy promoting playing dragons and supporting future dragon archetypes aswell: *confused confusing confusion*
fair LOL, I definitely contradicted myself ngl. Yeah Isolde can get banned if elpy gets banned ngl LOL, thanks for pointing that out though, definitely is good for me to be aware of that kind of stuff!
I think what konami should do with this list is to remove these "your opponent cannot play" cards (calamities, zexal, mystic mine, linkross, smoke grenade and red-eyes fusion). Leave the format as it is, i woudnt even touch elpy, misc, eldlich or invoked.
I think red eyes fusion is fine only reason people play it is cause of verte outside of that that engine would be killed i think honestly thing verte materials are too generic and should be banned or should of just helped its archetype cause most other fusion archetypes don't need it
@@WhyPhoenix U can still play it as an engine even without verte (3 fusion and 1 of each vanilla). Also verte and goons are rather new cards, konami tends to hit the older cards in these scenarios. Problem with red-eyes fusion is sending the materials from deck, konami had the foresight seeing the card could've been broken in the future and placed the "cannot summon other monsters for the turn" but verte conveniently bypass that restriction.
I appreciate the list but you went way to hard on dragonlink, banning buster, linkross, elpy and hitting chaos space and quick launch. Thats 5 hits to the deck. Banning buster and linkross solves every single issue with the deck rn, it goes back to being a fragile deck that loses to nibiru just like it was and has been for a year or so.
Why focus on Miscellaneous, the problem card is Archsaur. That stupid thing turned the deck into massive pain in the ass. I'd say just ban that and Dino goes back to being a tier 2 deck that has a less consisten way of getting double evolution pill. If dino needs to be kept further in check, I advocate for either limiting Fossil dig or Babycerasauras. Miscilleneous is fine on its own, it just became stupid as hell because it became a one card Archsaur and then massive dino combo.
How about 3 Red reboot? Not gonna suggest 3 Pankratops cuz Konami would want to sell Alpha still but I think 3 Red reboot could put control in check too.
What you said about VFD is what I’ve been saying and everyone is saying I’m an idiot. Double calamities is disgusting. 1 is fine and still sells VW just fine. Isolde may be put to 1 and Striker may be put to 1.
7:15 Because We Don't WANT to Kill Dinos! Me:Well,They're Going to Die At Some Point. Maybe Konami Will Ban Every Dino Card Just Like How a Wandering Nibiru-Shaped Meteor Killed All of the Dinos 65M Years Ago... This Has Been "The History Card" With Ryan Wiebe...Tune In Next Week Where We Discuss Why The Phantom Knights Are The Coolest Yugioh Monsters Ever...Goodnight,and Have a Great December(If 2020 Will Let Us Have One)...
I think Isolde is fine, its only really good whrn its exploitable, hence why it popsnin and out of the format, Elpy has seen play since release and always will so long as its legal considering it turns crusadia draco into borrelsword dragon and thats not even an optimal play.
Ah yes. True King of Calamities, the most healthy card in the game. I have to disagree with you on this one. VFD should not be on anything higher than 0, it's not only problematic for many decks to out, but it's also easy to summon i decks like Volkswagen or Generaiders. And boy do I love not being able to play yugioh for 2 turns while my opponent builds his death laser in the meantime. I personally think neither Elpy or Isolde would be hit at all, the latter could be limited though to make Infernobles more susceptible to hand traps. Other than that I think it's a solid list.
I agree with these. I still think isolde should also b banned, moulinglacia be banned and scarlet sanguine to 1, but the changes you mentioned would b enough
Hey blade. I think you make good content and bring up valid points but i have to disagree with this banlist prediction. I think there are some things you missed and points you didn't necessarily think thru. I do agree that linkross should get banned. However in addition to that I think calamities needs to get the axe as well. Its far too easy to make now going 1st and even at 1 copy the card is still really unfair and promotes non interaction. There shouldn't be a format where if you dont open a handtrap you lose and that's what calamities makes. Its a card that too many decks in the meta have access to and shouldn't. I dont see halq getting banned but i could see it going to 1 to keep certain things in check. Also elpy isn't getting banned bro. Konami needs to sell the upcoming march reprint set ghosts from the past which will have the new dragunity support in it. Dragunity needs elpy to be viable. Komani isn't banning it. Also I think cards that can come back would be electrumite. If warriors have isolde then pends can have 1 Electrum. Also miragestallio can come back too. Outside of that everything else in this video seemed spot on.
Eldlich is a sus hit.Imo I think Isolde should be hit, the card is just nuts. Last addition to comment; I think virtual world had been out for a month, people were just more preoccupied with the pk support.
Players: Ban Halqi
Konami: U want us to ban all the tuners ok.
There are no more abusable tuners except marcher
Well their hands are tied until events come back. The card has never seen play at even a regional
@@SnivyTeamLeader Deskbot 001
@@underpressure1954 your right
@@SnivyTeamLeader plaguespreader zombie, it can fill the spot in a pretty similar combo to jet synchron
It’s wild to me that True King of All Calamities has been around for so long but it only has just entered the meta in a major way.
Early orcust made it very easily, but bardiche also got banned early into orcust’s life.
TK Dino was also meta back in the day and rogueish last year a couple of times.
What about generators, they made it kinda easy
@@nickhero6329 My generaider deck makes two very easy but I prefer to not.. ya know be a dick.
What are your thoughts on these predictions?
EDIT: People pointed out that I contradicted myself with Elpy and Isolde, my apologies about that! I just now realized that, and you're totally right! Isolde can get banned too, or neither gets hit and instead these variants of dragons and warriors will get hit in different ways!
Perfect if we had events. But they can't really hit cards released this year as people haven't gotten to play tbe of Linkross and Sanguine at all. I think you could hit Marcher instead of Kross. Definitely not ideal but I think Konami should respect its consumers
Pretty good list, although hitting quicklaunch and sanguine is to much IMO, chaos space sure because Its more busted. Calamities needs to go as Its azathots little brother, and I dont think It wil hurt VW. Also I think you missed zexal :0 . Anyways, love the videos!
@@miguelnunez3094 I think if you hit Elpy that would be enough for now. See Zexal is degenerate but people kinda banned it themselves by not playing the card.
@@miguelnunez3094 zexal hasnt done anything.... and we have utopia support
Red-Eyes Fusion? RIP Altergeists.
Instead of baning Misc, can we please get Called by the Grave, back at three ?
called by not coming back to three they trying to sell crossout designer
Called by won't help you when dinos go first
@@lashajanashia1878 Ash and Belle can
@@kish45 belle doesn't do anything against because it banishes for cost, skull meister, ash and gamma are the only handtrap that can negate misc
@@andreabuzzolani7205 Since when does it say that on the card?
Everything made sense in this video except sanguine to 2. Eldlich is not a problem at all, the deck is completely fair and actually balances the game. Without eldlich top tier play will be almost 100% combo. Eldlich doesn’t hand rip, doesn’t domain lock, and doesn’t even put up negates. Why would we hit eldlich?
Totally fair, I was tbh worried people would comment about me being biased towards combo ngl, but I def agree that eldlich realistically is gooch.
I whole heartedly disagree he basically almost said make dragon link unplayable and lightly touch infernoble like linkcross and buster is the only hits dragon link needs to make the deck fair imo it will be more susceptible to hand traps and only put up like 2 or 3 negates which is not hard to play through if you bait properly Vfd needs to go its much hard to play through a floodgate that can dodge targeting and makes it so your opponent cannot even get a game state started and its not even dedicated like zexal is when most of the time it will be the only thing on the field compared to vfd getting backed up by other monsters and backrow
@@WhyPhoenix Dude. If banning a link 1 monster that can specail any dragon extender from deck and banning a card like the buster lock that doesnt allow your opponent to play ruins your deck you should find another deck
No eldlich infinite recources are incredibly annoying for the opponent so it’s unhealthy for the game. Definitely needs some sort of hit.
@@konstantink7310 its not infinite resources. it is 3 pops, and 3 ddcrows. What are you talking about?
I see you taking your chance at free content
Jajaja
@@BladeYGO Jajaja
jajaja
“I say we get right into this”
Me: aye let’s get it
“But first..”
Me: OOF 😂😂
There is a trend i keep seeing with these prediction videos from multiple yugitubers.
*they don't mention MYSTIC MINE*
Day 228 of waiting for Vendread support
We've all lost hope that mystic mine will ever end up on the banlist...
Mystic mine doesnt need to be banned, limited maybe but not banned
@@lampsonmcstand6150 lol I will never understand how mystic mine is allowed but not skill drain we don't need mystic mine its too polarizing of a card skill drain needs to be at 3 Nd mystic needs be at 1 or banned
Is any relevant deck even using mine? Typically for floodgates to be banned.
it literally has to warp the format drastically similar to vanity emptiness, oppression etc.. It has to be played in nearly every deck, for Konami to hit it. Atleast that has been the pattern.
Mine is broken don't get me wrong but it's not making the format toxic like needlfiber and other combo engines are being thrown in every deck.
@@JDBass36 i see what you mean but that's mostly player choice and there are still people topping with mystic mine burn like mystic mine has terrible card design their are better floodgates thag are reasonable and still interactive
"halq helps every deck so it shouldn't get banned"
huh, forgot norden and gofu?
Even if it means getting tuners banned for no reason?
First like let’s go!!!!!
Omg I love your channel
I don't see why Chaos Space should be on the chopping block.
Lol ash a chaos space most likely that player is not winning
Play Dragon link it’s busted I love the card.
@@SnivyTeamLeader Sounds more like Dragon Link is the problem and not Chaos Space.
Right hit welp amd dragon link is just okay
Ban wyver dragon imo, it's a stupid card.
True king of all calamities healthy... good one. Also cards that say you cannot activate card effects are pretty fucking unfair in genral so zexal should be too . Hot red dragon archfiend one is pretty hard to summon so MAYBE JUST MAYBE it can stay but the others are super easy to summon
The issues I have with Zexal:
-3 or 4 monsters on board off rip(they can easily +1 or 2 at least)
-can dodge ash(if they open good) and nibiru
-is a splashable engine(Dragoon/Zexal is wosrt case scenario)
-S0 in general(needs to be ban)
-They have room for handtraps(especially more pure variants)
He said that VW was healthy. I can see what he means. VW locks you into synchro and XYZ if you want to actually play the deck and combo. Aside from calamities, they do not put up boards with multiple negates and they cant lock you out your extra deck. Calamities is essentially their only “you can’t play” win condition. They are play through hand traps as well, but not to the extent of the other decks. They have good recursion, and extenders, but the graveyard effects cost banishing. They have good grind game which is fair.
The other decks have halqui, linkross, auroradon and their other extenders to and basically utilize almost all the meta summing mechanics, save for the xyz that only VW relies on.
I think VFD should be banned, but putting it to one does force them to go a different route Once it is countered.
@@rez3r092 if you play alot of links a good card to run in the side against VW is knightmare corruptor iblee locks them into links
@@crossdaboss8914 Ah. I saw that. Is pretty good. I could see them having one link 1 in the extra to counter if it becomes prevalent in the meta.
"My Dragon Link Banlist Prediction for December 2020 - Yu-Gi-Oh!"
I don't think Elpy should get banned if we ban the extra deck lock. Dragon Link is fine as long as they don't get to set up 3 interruptions + the ED lock
Agreed
in my country we didn't celebrate the thanksgiving but, happy thanksgiving for everyone, and i wish you a great final month for all
Once dragon link dies, melffy will be meta!
Personally I'd rather Smoke Grenade and Buster Lock get hit instead of Elpy and Isolde, get rid of the completely unfair cards and then let's see how the decks shake out.
That's probably how it will turn out, but people like to make crazy speculations. Just hit Smoke, Dragon Buster and VFD and we have a much much healthier format
Ok so there is one problem I'm seeing here: if you hit combo decks too much I could see Dragoon getting way more popular because the format will be slower.
Dragoon is OP as fuck but with all of the new decks will most likely side or main cards like Darkruler No more or stuff that can handle Dragoon.
It wont get banned yet but give it time until a lot of decks abuse it.
Fair. TBH though, idk how insane it would be. The problem is Zoo now has Zeus, and if zoo is the most popular control deck then Zeus will be a super easy out to dragoon. Not saying Dragoon is bad by any means, but more so I think for the time being it should be manageable.
@@BladeYGO sure there are outs but Dragoon is just too damn easy to make and nearly every deck can run it. That's what's really degenerate about it imo.
@@LexAnarchy Wrong, dragoon itself is strong but the card that make that engine splashable everywhere is verte anaconda. Try putting out dragoon consistently without verte and let me know how that goes
@@alexv5581 yes that is literally what I said.
I 100% agree with your opinion on Halq. It's an amazing card but Linkcross is the main issue, at least at the moment. If dino does get hit, I think semi is fine, going to 1 straight away seems a little harsh, but that's just me haha.
When Misc was at 1 Dinos were dead
They should put it at 2 i think and dinos aren't their 2 they are definitely 1.5 or 1
Misc to 1 will not kill Dino because it has Archosaur and they can replace the 2 misc with different Dino monsters or cards Archosaur can search easily.
@@GGalladeIt kills Dino's grindgame. Were you playing when Misc was at 1?
@@WhyPhoenix Dinos are tier 2, there's literally *one* Dino deck in the LCS top 16, they used to be meta bc of their good match up against dlink and combo players didn't knew how to play against them
@@DaviRenania they are not ment to be good at the grind game. They are ment to OTK like a true nature of a Dinosaur
Harp horror to 1 yes it will make orcust tier 1 again but still It won't be as insane as it used to be plus orcust isn't good anymore so I think bringing back harp horror is a good idea and could help orcust be tier 1 again
banning elpy and not isolde is blatant bias, the cards are about equally powerful, and isolde has arguably been used in more degenerate combos then elpy
I suggest both get banned only to be fair.. and without them.. good dragon and warrior pilots can still do amazing things without them.
You neutered Dragon Link so hard and all you did to Infernoble was Linkross and Smoke Grenade. That's just wrong.
I think VFD should get banned, not limited.
Sanguine to 2 is a really interesting hit I haven't seen before and I like that.
Same thing I said basically gave the deck a vasectomy like just ban linkcross and buster whelp then all dragon link is a deck that can put of 2 negates and play through hand traps and ash a chaos space fucking hurts cause you going neg 1 off rip 2 cards to search one no reason for that to get hit
Linkross and smoke grenade are the only things that need to be hit for infernoble really, without linkross it gets destroyed by nib or a negate on needle potentially keeps them away from auradon, unless you open gearfried, and no smoke grenade makes their board very breakable because going second cards are viable again, the only thing they could go harder on is connector to 1 or dolphine banned, I wouldnt mind that also as dolphin is a very degenerate card
Dragon link definately deserves buster, linkross and elpy banned though, the deck is far too resilient to hand traps for a board that's way too good for such little investment, after that combo will be chilled out for the most part which I feel everyone is dying for to happen, the game has been straight combo aids since spyral and then adimancipator
Vfd should definitely just be banned also, no reason for it to be around any longer, virtual world is a fine deck even without it, it doesnt need the auto win button that should have been banned for so long now, I will say though if we can stop building our decks to beat combo vfd becomes a lot easier to deal with when you can afford to play nice cards
And sanguine to 2 is just.. dumb. Eldlich is not even that good, there's no reason to hit it at all
@@FrieginGoodVanguard there is no reason to 5 hit components of a deck like without linkcross and buster lock how oppressive is dragon link the worst think about dragon link is buster lock being backed up by 2 negates that's not hard to play through hitting linkcross and buster lock is best thing there too many answers to elpy ash,Impermanence,veiler,forbidden drop etc
@@FrieginGoodVanguard and combo is not unhealthy its just they can be obscenely resilient and dragon link without linkcross and buster lock is not hard to play against especially when you can use your extra deck
Aa for the dragon link hits... Chaos space probably won't get touched... Quick launch also probably not as its only playable in 1 deck which at the moment only plays like 4 rokkets anyway.. sanguine at 2 .. maybe but it'll get replaced with a black awakening so leaving it at 3 or putting it to 2 would do the same thing
What I predict:
BANNED: True King of All Calamities, Elpy, Isolde, Smoke Grenade, Linkross or Halqfibrax, and maybe Herald of the arc-light if they don't ban either of those two
LIMITED: Miscellaneousaurus, Oviraptor, TD Colussus, Quick-Launch
SEMI-LIMITED: No idea sorry
OFF THE LIST: Either Gazelle or Circle, Red Rebbot, Toadally Awesome, ABC-Dragon Buster, Infernity Archfiend and Card of Demise
If you ban Isolde or elpy there is no point in banning smoke grenade we can’t get to that anyway. Also your banned section is way to strong. Your ruining those decks, banlist are to control the meta not murder it
Limit: quick launch hit makes no sense you already killed dragon link colossus makes no sense that card is busted
And the Dino hits make no sense
@@SnivyTeamLeader Misc to one makes sense. Ovi is fine is misc is at one. Card of Demise to 3 scares me and I don't think salads need gaz or circle to anything more than 1. Already consistent without being hyperconsistent. I like the Quick-Launch Idea though.
@@michaelgrant8921 bro do you play salad it’s power crept. Also yeah ovi to 1 or misc to 1 défi not both
@king zaxa oh yeah I slipped up, it supposed to be of the list, thx
I would've liked to see you discuss 1 or 2 cards you'd like to see get off the ban list or move to limited/semi-limited, cause I think that's usually a really interesting thing to discuss or think about. For the most part, I agree with the entirety of everything. Smoke Grenade is the one card I've really hated this format, and I hope Buster goes peace with it as well.
I personally wouldn't want Elpy banned as a dragon player but I do agree it is a powerful card and should be looked at HOWEVER, I hope you can see that the arguments you used for not hitting Isolde can equally apply to Elpy as Dragon is also a fan favourite type with tons of d support and would help future dragon decks
Completely agree with the take on Buster and Smoke Grenade. People get too caught up in the idea of "JuSt HiT tHe EnAblers". The simple fact is, without smoke grenade the infernoble board is manageable. Instead of getting rid of every combo enabler, which in my mind is just a waste of time(while also just leaving decks in the dregs of playability), just get rid of the actual issue. Especially cards like those which will never be playable in a fashion which *isn't* unhealthy for the game.
Tbh hitting Oviraptor to 1 would be better than hitting misc imo, it’s hits their consistency but still lets the deck be powerful through misc and it’s other tools
I understand why people would look to quick launch but its archetype exclusive, dragon links are just very generic and rokkets have the best tools for it. As for chaos space, I think it's a bit early, destruction sword and linkcross should get hit for sure, both are degenerate and sword has been around a while
Exaclty linkcross and dragon buster is the only thing that needs to go then dragon link will be like 1.5 consistent deck that makes 2 to 3 negates and isn't as good at going second
@@WhyPhoenix i agree, smoke grenade could be banned for infernoble, but it could also be limited although its easy for them to access so I'd say ban the card that's been around for years and only sees play now, its almost delinquent duo in power, and if you can use 3, you can resolve ALL THREE... potentially
@@christopheraponte306 exactly i think it should be banned or limited but they thing its its not random it gives you hand info and what you are playing and even without infernoble is still a good deck I think we need less of all these blowout cards and have a bunch of decks at a good amount of power so they can all clash and so the meta can be entertaining and creative
@@WhyPhoenix generic cards should be strong, but they should be limited a bit, heavier costs, hard OPT clauses, and looking at hands is a bit OP, except on traps really because you have to wait a turn, in all other cases it should be randomized, which allows you a chance at hitting a card that would harm your plays or just hit a dead card and make their hand live, adds to the thrill and fun in that regard. Appointer is a good example, mind crush was unfortunate and viruses have fair costs which limits their use in most decks
@@christopheraponte306 yeah we need much stronger trap cards imo and weaker but useful spells and monster effects
Every card limited to 1, unless a different card calls for a specific card by original printed name, at 2 or 3, for summoning requirements or full effect completion.
Hah, you forgot one counter point that could destroy your Elpy ban prediction: Elpy is a good boi and we Dragon players love it.
Edit: Halq and and Linkross have to go though.
I think when Elpy is gone they don't need to ban link cross infernoble knight is just fine
@@Stylercom113 then the flaming french men will run rampant.
Sorry mate but fuck guardragons. They broke what dragons could already do and pushed them to infinity. I’m tired of having to mess up my deck building with a bunch of hand traps and pray I draw 2+ and even then I’ve seen good pilots ignore what I did and go ham.. like ash blossom , imperm and Nibiru.. and still went off. It’s silly.
@@bloodarcher7841 nah bro, you have to go PLUS Utra with the link Dragons.
I think most of these are accurate, though personally I think the eldlitch one is a bit of a stretch. I get the control check, but given how it's been a combo format, I think it's expected only combo decks will get real hit.
I don't think Chaos Space or Sanguine should be hit in any way. I think the healthy thing is to always hit once the problem arises.The fact Sanguine made trap decks viable again, like we needed that tbh. Other than that I agree with all the hits you mentioned. However, I do think that if they wanna keep Halq, then can they hit Linkross & Auroradon. Since Halq+Deskbot Engine+Aurardon can end on multiple negate boards.
Sanguine won't be hit, not for awhile a least. Because the new Fusion Eldlich is coming to the TCG in February with Blazing Vortex
Kross will go eventually but hasn't seen a single real event yet and if they didn't hit Called, especially before Designator is out, then get rid or Kross and Calamities and Dinos are quite fair. Hitting Scarlet seems excessive now that Eldlich has been power crept hard but a semi isn't that bad. Just my thoughts on the list.
Ban:
*Linkross*(tbh I think they could just errata it to use Cyberse link monsters as material and it would fall out of the meta but they won't do that)
*Buster Welp* (or maybe errata it to only work with Buster Blader)
*Smoke Grenade*(ripping cards is unfair) or maybe Isolde instead. I don't see them hitting both though.
*True King of All Calamities*(just....no)
If they don't ban Linkross, maybe ban Martial Metal Marcher?
*Elpy*(too good of an extender being able to summon one from the deck, long time coming)
Limit
*Misc*
Bring *Thunder Dragon Collosus* back to 1, maybe Harp Horror too.
Maybe an Eldlich card?
Semi
*Called by the Grave*
Unlimit
*ABC Dragon Buster*
*Toadally Awesome*
Also virtual world is still good without calamities, which means calamities just makes it more unfair
Isnt dragunity support coming out relatively soon? The kept eply in the game for so long, banning it now that were this close to it seems kinda weird to me.
Also banning linkross would mean making a statement that konami has been desperately trying to avoid making: cards you buy can get banned before u'll ever have a chance to play them irl. They kinda dodged they issue last list by hitting old cards like block dragon or jet. Imo this banlist they'll pull smth similar by hitting a couple of old yet really strong cards like smoke, buster and maybe calamities? But that'll be it.
Dragon buster is only accessible because union carrier exists. It is literally archetype locked without union carrier.
A suggestion for nerfing dinosaurs: why not ban/limit Ultimate Conductor? It’s their boss monster, so why not see what else they can make instead of it?
You do realize that dinos are not very good at combo right? Its not like they just just turbo out Savage + Dragoon naturally. Skyhawk has made some combo dino decks. But you don't see those in tournament for a reason. Cutting UCT would pretty much kill the deck. The only other option VFD turbo. And i don't think people want another VFD turbo deck.
Electrumite because PENDULUM BEST DECK
Also because metalfoes are actually getting new Support soon, and what better way to promote the new Support than by getting metalfoes best link monster off the banlist. It's a strong possibility, cause Konami did the same thing for phantom knights by getting rusty off the banlist to promote the new Phantom knight Support
No thanks. I love pendulums but for the future of pendulums i would prefer Electrumite to not be in the game
@@dce7845 For the future of pendulums, we need Electrumite. Konami isn't giving every pendulum archetype a link monster.
@@jestersol7100 uhh yeah they can make a link monster for every pendulum archetype. They forced pendulums to have to play Links so it would only make sense to release links for pendulum archetypes. Electrumite only leads to pendulum.deks where you play the best stack of pendulum cards to make massive turn 1 boards.
@@dce7845 They can, but they won't, and it's better to have every pendulum deck be a cookie cutter list than have them all be unviable.
Dude, this guy REALLY hates dragon link gee
elpy is definetly worth a consideration but tbh i dont think it would even hurt the dragon deck much.
banning romulus for example (especially if cross is banned too) they would lose alot more consistency than by losing elpy, because in the end you just use elpy for redmd or brotaur to get 1 extra ressource. without elpy dragons still have almost all of their insane plays.
Carrier should go. Too generic and if not equipping, it’s dumping. Plus there’s another Buster Equip card that’s is pretty good too.
Isolde helps my casual warrior decks so I really hope it doesn’t get banned. Same with elpy but there are so many options to use for extenders and searchers for a lot of my dragon decks
If Sanguine goes to 2 or 1 that just means that they start to run 1 white 1 black. :(
If e-tele is at 1, quick launch is at 1.
I agree with that although e tele is generic psychics and quick launch only apply to rokkets but I think e tele should be at 3 makes deck building more fun and more people will explore the meta and plus ash is a thing
Dragon buster destruction sword is not fair, because I dont know what is the backrow, but dont touch union carrier and dont touch my extra deck full deniers 😭
If you wanna check control, limit meltdown or Nadir Servant, eldlich isnt doing as much as those 2 engines in a single deck
Can't wait until the only Tuners are Cryrstrons and Syncros
Well misc going to 1 wouldn’t be too bad since there are cards like Burial from a different dimension that can recycle it.
dragon buster destruction sword was not the problematic card union carrier is what made it the problem card ban union stop dragon buster destruction sword from being able to extra deck lock outside of its archetype.
calamities is a massive hit to fluffals so i hope it stays
Boiiiii no one gives af bout fluffal’s
And Halq is super important in crystron, doesnt make it not banworthy
Destruction sword is important in Buster Blader, Dragun is important in Dark Magician and Red-Eyes Decks, etc
@@rodrigoandrade256 buster blader dont even use whelp
@@underpressure1954 Of course they do, check out the deck list
The main goal is to set up the Dragon with the whelp and the Buster Blader Fusion
Always a good day when blade uploads. Plunder best deck
Chaos space hasn't been out for half a year yet though
Dang Blade, it's almost as if you're trying to outright KILL Infernoble Knights!
So i dont think youre wrong on any of your points imo. I just believe that Konami will keep the list relatively small and more than likely bring cards back off the list. I think Smoke Grenade and Buster Whelp are likely bans. I dont see them banning Linkross yet... unfortunately. I think youre reasoning on Calamities correct. I do think that a limit to Calamities is a appropriate. I personally would rather see the Fossil Dig to 1 than Misc right now. (Fossil dig is a not opt rota) and this will still limit how much they see Misc in their opening hands but still leave dinos strong and also open up how they can make dinosaur archetypes in the future. I honestly doubt anymore hits will happen with no real life events :( i think Cir and Graff will probably come off the list. Im not an advocate for it but Electrumite might come off the list. I could see Infernity Archfiend coming off the list. I definitely see Buster and Toad coming off the list. I could also see E-Tele coming to 2 but thats risky imo. Those are my thoughts
I disagree with destruction sword. Not because I think it's fun to get locked out of your extra deck but because I think Union carrier is the problem.
The card is, just like Halq, Isolde and Linkross stupidly generic for no reason but it can create future problem along the line, whereas a card like destruction sword, which is limited to it's Archetye wouldn't be as prone to creating more degeneracy. And well just just kind of stupid that a card for a fun-ish Archetpe has to get hit just because Union carrier exists.
TL;DR: I disagree because I do not like generic ( mainly extra deck ) cards in yugioh
Blade: Ban Elpy, but keep isolde cus she promotes playing warriors, one of the most popular types
Elpy promoting playing dragons and supporting future dragon archetypes aswell: *confused confusing confusion*
Bro I said the exact same thing if you look at my comment his logic is fucked
Dragunity and shit coming out they are not banning elpy
@@WhyPhoenix Yes it is buddy, yes it is
fair LOL, I definitely contradicted myself ngl. Yeah Isolde can get banned if elpy gets banned ngl LOL, thanks for pointing that out though, definitely is good for me to be aware of that kind of stuff!
@@justacasualcrimsonygo7533 eventually not now tho dragunity will flop if they do
My list:
Banned: true king, elphy, linkross, mecha phanton link
Limited: halq, isolde, misc or fossil dig
limiting isolde and halq does very little as most play 1.
I think what konami should do with this list is to remove these "your opponent cannot play" cards (calamities, zexal, mystic mine, linkross, smoke grenade and red-eyes fusion). Leave the format as it is, i woudnt even touch elpy, misc, eldlich or invoked.
That would be great tbh
I think red eyes fusion is fine only reason people play it is cause of verte outside of that that engine would be killed i think honestly thing verte materials are too generic and should be banned or should of just helped its archetype cause most other fusion archetypes don't need it
@@WhyPhoenix U can still play it as an engine even without verte (3 fusion and 1 of each vanilla). Also verte and goons are rather new cards, konami tends to hit the older cards in these scenarios. Problem with red-eyes fusion is sending the materials from deck, konami had the foresight seeing the card could've been broken in the future and placed the "cannot summon other monsters for the turn" but verte conveniently bypass that restriction.
Halq and elpy are fine to me. Linkross needs to go. And Calamities needs to go if not now. Then it goes next list. Finally bring Engage back to one.
I appreciate the list but you went way to hard on dragonlink, banning buster, linkross, elpy and hitting chaos space and quick launch. Thats 5 hits to the deck. Banning buster and linkross solves every single issue with the deck rn, it goes back to being a fragile deck that loses to nibiru just like it was and has been for a year or so.
Also, while chaos space is really good, it is not even close to terratop
Why focus on Miscellaneous, the problem card is Archsaur. That stupid thing turned the deck into massive pain in the ass. I'd say just ban that and Dino goes back to being a tier 2 deck that has a less consisten way of getting double evolution pill. If dino needs to be kept further in check, I advocate for either limiting Fossil dig or Babycerasauras. Miscilleneous is fine on its own, it just became stupid as hell because it became a one card Archsaur and then massive dino combo.
How about 3 Red reboot? Not gonna suggest 3 Pankratops cuz Konami would want to sell Alpha still but I think 3 Red reboot could put control in check too.
I think verta anaconda should get banned so dragoon can be limited to red-eyes and dark magician decks only.
As a long time Salad player, can my boi Miragestallio be put at one? Please konami
I’m fine with that. Salad isn’t as busted as I thought originally.
Union carrier ban is healthier than dragon buster ban
He basically wants to kill dragon decks. Chaos space and quick launch are fine
What you said about VFD is what I’ve been saying and everyone is saying I’m an idiot.
Double calamities is disgusting. 1 is fine and still sells VW just fine. Isolde may be put to 1 and Striker may be put to 1.
7:15 Because We Don't WANT to Kill Dinos!
Me:Well,They're Going to Die At Some Point. Maybe Konami Will Ban Every Dino Card Just Like How a Wandering Nibiru-Shaped Meteor Killed All of the Dinos 65M Years Ago...
This Has Been "The History Card" With Ryan Wiebe...Tune In Next Week Where We Discuss Why The Phantom Knights Are The Coolest Yugioh Monsters Ever...Goodnight,and Have a Great December(If 2020 Will Let Us Have One)...
If we bannd linkross, buster and snoke granate there is seriously need bannd elpy too?
I’d argue that elpy is a ticking time bomb, something will come and abuse it eventually so why not ban it?
I think Isolde is fine, its only really good whrn its exploitable, hence why it popsnin and out of the format, Elpy has seen play since release and always will so long as its legal considering it turns crusadia draco into borrelsword dragon and thats not even an optimal play.
Ah yes. True King of Calamities, the most healthy card in the game.
I have to disagree with you on this one. VFD should not be on anything higher than 0, it's not only problematic for many decks to out, but it's also easy to summon i decks like Volkswagen or Generaiders. And boy do I love not being able to play yugioh for 2 turns while my opponent builds his death laser in the meantime.
I personally think neither Elpy or Isolde would be hit at all, the latter could be limited though to make Infernobles more susceptible to hand traps. Other than that I think it's a solid list.
No dino hits and no invoked hit? Mental
I agree with these. I still think isolde should also b banned, moulinglacia be banned and scarlet sanguine to 1, but the changes you mentioned would b enough
Hey blade. I think you make good content and bring up valid points but i have to disagree with this banlist prediction. I think there are some things you missed and points you didn't necessarily think thru. I do agree that linkross should get banned. However in addition to that I think calamities needs to get the axe as well. Its far too easy to make now going 1st and even at 1 copy the card is still really unfair and promotes non interaction. There shouldn't be a format where if you dont open a handtrap you lose and that's what calamities makes. Its a card that too many decks in the meta have access to and shouldn't. I dont see halq getting banned but i could see it going to 1 to keep certain things in check. Also elpy isn't getting banned bro. Konami needs to sell the upcoming march reprint set ghosts from the past which will have the new dragunity support in it. Dragunity needs elpy to be viable. Komani isn't banning it. Also I think cards that can come back would be electrumite. If warriors have isolde then pends can have 1 Electrum. Also miragestallio can come back too. Outside of that everything else in this video seemed spot on.
where is my electrumite limited, i feel cheated
Not gonna happen sub weapon
i want them to free jet synchron and my performapals
JUST BAN MYSTIC MINE
btw ovi is the problem with dinos not misc
I WANT BLASTER OR MIRAGESTALLIO GET OUT AT LEAST AT 1
Basically dragon Link will be unplayable. No Elpy only 1 or 2 quicklaunch.
Don't ban needlefiber. Just ban the tuners/synchros. Ty.
I'll try buster dogmatika
damn if they hit Chaos Space my Orcust Lightsworn Chaos deck is fucked
I'd love to see the bring back destrudo sometime
Eldlich is a sus hit.Imo I think Isolde should be hit, the card is just nuts. Last addition to comment; I think virtual world had been out for a month, people were just more preoccupied with the pk support.
Chaos space isnt a issue at all
Konami pls more red reboot😂😂
In order to bring back Level Eater, Konami needs to ban ALL OF THE PROBLEMATIC Link monsters.
I mean, let's be real here, your videos are awesome.
Drident to three. They literally just power crept that card by a long shot with zuess being a thing. It can come off.
Can we get orcust harp horror off the ban list we need it pls
You must want the gates of hell to open up huh?
All i want for Christmas is a reliable DDD support instead 3 pages of PENELUM BEAT POWERRR
*i am in need of guidance during this absolute downward spiral of a format*
Haha jokes on you, we don't have Thanksgiving here
Electromight to 1 double iris to 2 Joker to 3