Tesla Model 3 (2018) Side Pole Crash Test
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 09. 2018
- This is the NHTSA NCAP side pole crash test for 2018 Tesla Model 3 (RWD/Long Range)
NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) Side Pole Impact:
A small-sized adult female crash test dummy is placed in the driver's seat and is secured with a seat belt. The test vehicle, angled at 75 degrees, is then pulled sideways at 20 mph (32km/h) into a 25-cm diameter pole at the driver's seating location. This test mimics a side impact crash involving a narrow, fixed object like a utility pole or tree. 1 star is the lowest rating; 5 stars is the highest. More stars equal safer cars.
Overall Rating: 5-Star
Overall Front Star Rating: 5-Star
Front Driver Side: 5-Star
Front Passenger Side: 5-Star
Overall Side Star Rating: 5-Star
Combined Side Barrier and Pole Ratings (Front Seat): 5-Star
Combined Side Barrier and Pole Ratings (Rear Seat): 5-Star
Side Barrier Rating: 5-Star
Side Barrier (Driver): 5-Star
Side Barrier (Rear Passenger): 5-Star
Rollover Star Rating: 5-Star
The rollover rating measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.
Buying a Tesla? Use this Tesla referral code and get $100 Supercharging credit for your Model S, Model X or Model 3:
www.tesla.com/referral/albert...
CrashNet1 is a crash test video database with a collection of over 1,500 crash tests. Videos include test footages of late model vehicles, vintage car crash tests, child seat crash tests and more. We'd love to have you as a subscriber.
Browse test videos: / crashnet1
FB: / crashnet1
G+: www.google.com/+CrashNet1
Twitter: / crashnet1
On the web: www.CrashNet1.com - Auta a dopravní prostředky
This should be the best result pole test ever
it is
it is
All teslas are.
0:43 side pole test, minimal crumpling, superb!
Wow! On the collision 0:33 0:38 the car even turns on the stops lights
I think that goes for all cars
@@kalebslife1 I mean modern cars
Aren't they just hazards slown down?
Awesome!
I was hoping to see the under-carriage shot like they had with the straight front impact, as it relates to battery damage.
so this is what you need to do if you can't get the charging port to open
😂😂
Lmao
really good
Ver como casi no se arruga del habitáculo y es más vuelve casi a la misma posición después del impacto lateral me da mucha alegría y aún gente que piensa que no es seguro.
That's impressive
You should make more videos my guy
Wow!
This crash would be more realistic if the impact velocity was 50km/h.
I agree, it seems the standard is set at 30. It should be increased simply due to the fact that we travel faster as roads become larger. I don't however have any data on how often vehicles are in this type of accident let alone the data compiled by accident investigators to discern the speed at which the impact occurred, so I can't exactly argue urgency.
It took it like a champ.
Why haven’t you uploaded? :(
Tesla should be the standard for the rating system
it is
@@HappyLeoul wow didn't know that
Ninja Man I mean the Model S and Model X are the first and second highest safety rated, so people compare other cars to those.
@@HappyLeoul but mainstream people still look to Volvo at the best
@@TROllingNINJA2031 Look at Euro Ncap that measures rating by exact percentage. Volvo has a lot better ratings than model s even though they are both rated 5 star
Why they use water
Is it for sale?
Is this channel still alive?
i think yeah.
EDIT: or not.
I'm still concerned about what happens if it runs off a high cliff on HWY 1. I don't think they have addressed that issue.
I think you got the answer 😉😉recent model y incident in California cliff.. driver(father) tried to suicide but everyone (4/4) was alive including 2 children .. model 3 and y safety level same ..
Holy fuck
It's impossible....
So what do they do with car when there done I'd take a wrecked tesla
I've seen past Tesla crash testing cars up for auction for parts.
*T E S L A I S L I F E*
Vídeos nissan Rouge 2015
Huh?
Try this in 30mph and in a different situation
If normal cars had that super strong battery tray at the bottom they would do better in this crash but it not really an economical solution
Not enough crumple to absorbe impact energy…
In a side impact, there is not much room at all for a crumple zone. The only acceptable crumple would be from the door extending past the structure of the car. You do not want the structure giving at all, or SRS devices wont have the space to work effectively.
Bmw x6m 2010 plase
The speed of 32 \ km is very low and unrealistic should be higher
Agree. At higher speed (which is way more plausable) the probability of death is comparable close with other cars. ;)
geetjuhhisdebeste At 32kmh you are already dead in some cars. Tesla is doing the best job in keeping people safe.
@@charleization
Dead at 32 km/h (not mph) ... which car brand would you attribute it to?! With overlash or in a side pole crash (or crash against a tree) yes, death can be the result but really shouldn't be at this low speed!
Tesla certainly is doing a decent/good job, no question about it - although the Model 3 is not as good as the S. But if you want a car for it's safety attributes, I think Volvo is the brand to go for - they promised 'death prove cars' by 2020 and have their own safety facility where they do more research than every other car brand. ;)
geetjuhhisdebeste I saw the side pole test for the new Evoque. It didn’t look good. Thanks for the Volvo advice.
@@charleization Woaw.... I looked up the Evoque and it's really an embarrassment; especially for such an expensive car. Thanks for the warning. :D
Too tough
I remember seeing the model S side pole test and saying wow but then i read a little more and is not good that the car deforms so little because theres no energy dissipation and drivers chest suffers fatal injuries...
This is only true for crumple zones. The passenger compartment should deform as less as possible because if it deforms too much the impacting obstacle will hit the passenger directly. Compare this crash test to the test of a BMW and tell me that the BMW is better for the passenger because it is not. The BMW deforms a lot more and you can see how the dummy is hit way harder by the pole. czcams.com/video/qa1Z5O4G6uo/video.htmlm3s
Safer than XC90
No it's not
Poor crash tests are dangerous!
Sure beats the hell out of volvo
In terms of dummy injury measurements the Volvo is ahead in safety.
Volvo performs better
0:12 Wait... is this the part with real speed? This looks VERY SLOW. Cars smash into poles at 40 or 50 mph, not 15-20 mph. Does this test even make sense at such low speed? It does not translate to a real life scenario.