I've had the chance to play with mine some and find it to be an excellent all around knife. What surprised me is how well it chops. The knife isn't heavy but the 5" blade can really go to work chopping. I'm not a metal guru, but the steel seems to hold a sharp edge through much use. Touch ups are easy on either a ceramic rod or just via light stropping. Finally, the sheath is excellent. I wish all knives came with such a well constructed sheath. For the approximately $50 US I paid, this is an excellent heavy duty bushcraft knife!
@@Thoristesting hej Thor! Jag står i valet mellan en garberg carbon och den finska kniven du testar som är 140. Villet skulle du välja och isåfall varför skulle du välja den? Jag kommer mest ha den till att ta med mig i skogen för att göra upp eld, men även kunna försvara mig om ett djur kommer osv
Kör den stora. Den är inte klumpig. Bra grepp i kallt väder, funkar bra även att hugga med. Grymt bra stål, jag kör lite kokosolja på min. Den är helt skottsäker och funkar säkert bra att försvara sig med👍
Thor, This is the first of your videos I have watched. It was truly refreshing to watch some one who knows how to get the best use out of a medium sized knife blade when chopping with it. When you rotated that branch and chopped it circumferentially I thought, "Finally a knife reviewer who knows how to think and get the best use out of a tool!" Watching many other knife tests/reviews it is painful to see how they only work one way, and not always the smartest, with getting through lumber. I've even seen some who, I swear, don't grasp that heat from a fire Goes Up! Like I said, Painful. I have subscribed and plan to check out many more of your evals. I have been looking at the JaakariPuukos for some time now, debating whether I should get the 110 or the 140. You have helped me decide on the 140 today. Thank you.
The late Mors Kochanski had a good definition for a survival knife. For cold weather you need a good handle. Isolated and big, so you don't touch the metal.
I picked one up (sadly without the sheath due to limited financial issues) a couple ofmonths ago. I wish I had it when I first started 'woodsrunnin' over 50 years ago. Darn fine blade! Now I'll have to make a good sheath to replace the old one I had available. 'stay safe keep warm have fun and whittle to keep your sanity' ol greybeard dino ; - ) >
Doug Duncan , well the knife is the most important, lol, though it is a nice made sheet. But again sheets are durable to make :) Nice quote, I'll remember that. Stay jolly
For many years I have the 140 in SS I sharpened it to zero grind It is a most amazing field knife The balance is superb exactly at the handle so with the zero grind I can do fine carving as if it was a whittling knife And then also it chops and splits
Excellent review brother, now if I could actually buy one that would be also excellent LOL The knife is so popular I don't we will ever see them restocked enough to ever own one for ourselves. The price is amazing and IMHO a better product than Mora's Garburg.
Thor-is-testing Its funny cause I ended up buying the Garberg just after my comment here 4 months ago. I've been using it for my edc and its a really good knife, Mora did an excellent job IMO on the handle design. At first I wasn't to sold on their choice of material but after 3months of daily work the handle gets smooth and very comfortable, its also tough as nails. I plan on getting that 140 cause the 110 is to close to the Garberg size, I think the extra length is perfect, esp for batoning and clearing limbs.
the garberg is also a very nice knife, I have not testede it but I have used it :) The Terävä is a bit more "primitive" and gung ho, and a bit bigger than the Garberg as you point out, I think you will love it :)
In the Video I say that the knife is 100€, that is how it goes when you are off the grid. It is only 60€ which is a great deal www.varusteleka.com/en/product/terava-jaakaripuukko-140-w-leather-sheath/33532
The 110 is all out until 3 weeks out...but I'm thinking the 140 seems better for things like this, seems a bit more versatile at the cost of some dexterity in doing some tasks like shaving wood. J.P. Peltonen makes a good one for rangers but it's about twice as expensive
PeuraPitkä, I agree, the 140 is probably more visible, but I have not yet have the privilege to have the 110 in hand, but I hear it's nice to. I love the peneltonen to, as I recall it not that much more than the 140, but I could be wrong
i have the 110 and 140 and i have to say i like the size of the 140 better. The 110 will be my beater knife and ill keep the 140 on my hip. Sandpapered the heat treat off and im not sure what i like better... with heat treat or not. Its a great knife though. the handle geometry is great and feels great. The sheath is outstanding for the cost of this knife. Does it look like a bark river or ltwr knife? No, but this knife wasnt build to show off. It was built to use and get things done with. Great purchase. buy one if you can.
The 110 and 140 look like great knives. I have several bushcraft style knives, but usually go with my scandi styled ones as they seem to work best with what I do. I'm kind of torn between the 140 and the kellam fang. In your opinion, how would these compare? Signed, your newest subscriber.
Hi Michael, thats a tough one, it kind of depends on what you like, the terävä is a better knife i think, it is like the producers say, a no bullshit knife, no dikidi just knife, full tang and a great durabel grind. The fang on the other hand is a well made, no dought, and it is a beauty, and I would were it anytime. So going out on the town I would chose the Fang, and it will dominans well, but in the Bush I would go with the Terävä 😀🇩🇰
Thor-is-testing Just got my 140 in the mail. It's an amazing knife, so well balanced it feels and works like a much smaller knife. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
The Terävä 140 vs Garberg.... UHHH that is a hard one. if it was only knife to knife I must admid I love the Terävä they are so no bullshit knife, and has never let me down. but I think objective they are the same quality. though Terävä has a very nice leather sheath and Garberg has the Multimount sheath. Dose that help?
Hello. I have this knife and its great. But I like to see a comparison video with j p peltonen m95 if it's possible. As I can see they are similars. Does it worth to buy M95 if I already have these knife? Best regards.
its only 72 cad before shipping so like.. 85 shipped to canada u said 100 euro thats 140 cad so your a little off on the price.. those knives are great value, good video!
Hi, Natsyrt, Yes I know, I made a comment about it below, when ur off the grid, u have to try to remember, and aparently I was off with the price, I agree, GREAT value for money
franco annoni , 👋 there, I really like the condore knifes, so I will definitely take a look at it when I start reviewing international knifes. but I guess that will be soon, almost through the Scandinavian
Hi Dick, I agree, but I also want to know what the tool, I normaly, have with me can handle. thats why it is important to be if it can chop.If I have acces to a hatchet, id use that anyday :)
Bushcraft Beats , well carbon is easier to sharpen, but stainless is more a use and forget blade, if u take care of blade after every use, carbon should be good. But if u use u knife I costal area with lots of salt, stainless might be better 😀 my opion
In use carbon blade should be superior but in terms of taking care of it stainless is superior. Note: You probably have to sharpen stainless more often though. However, it is not quite this simple as there are a huge variety to both blade types. I would get carbon for myself but I am more of a traditional guy :)
Thor, which do you prefer, the Jaakaripuukko 140 cm. or the Peltonen M95? They are both similar knives, designed for the same role. It is therefor reasonable to do a direct comparison. I have both, and, whilst they are each superb, I think that the Jaakaripuukko is that little bit better.
Hej Anthony, thats a dificult one, they are similar, but different in 2 ways i think. The m95 is a military knife, and hens slimmer and more combat knife. the terävä is a bush knife broader with a wider grind. So if I neede a combat knife i World go with the m95, but as a bushcrafter i would go with the terävä. Also I use firesteel a lot, and the m95 is coatede and Can not be usede with firesteel. So a littel favor toward terävä. BUT they i both great knife, and I would trust my life with both
In your opinion, how does this one compare to the J.P. Peltonen M95? I've been using the M95 for almost 20 years now, I'm exceedingly happy with it and I was wondering if the Jääkäripuukko 140 would be even better.
Hi Dimetropteryx, sr for the late answer, i have been off the grid, this point have been pointed out in some of the other comments :) but generel they are both awsome knifes, about the same size and quality, the way they differ is that the M95 is more slim, and have a finer edge, also it is coated so it can't be used with firesteel. I think if your a militaryman or some sort paramilitary organisation, i think the M95 is the best, if your a bushcrafter i think the Terävä is better :)
Thanks for the reply. :) I suppose I am a bushcrafter. Haven't had much use for my firesteel yet, I'm still running around with matches. I have the oldest model of the M95, which has a rounded spine, so using it to strike sparks is definitely out of the question. The oldest model was also blued instead of teflon coated.
Hi Trey, Hmmmm that depends on how you take care of your knifes, normally I tend to like Canbon vs Steinless steel in that it is easy to sharpen. but like you say, it have a tendency to rust. but if you clean your knife after using it and keep it oiled i have no problem with rust, though another carbon knife i had, i cut som appels for a Mose, and that made rust stains within hours, so thats something to think of
Hi Timo, Yup the finnish guys how makes these take a pride in, that it is a no bullshit knife, looks dont matter only functions :)Take a look at Casström, Lars Fält kniven, awesome beautiful knife :)
@@mikkihintikka7273 i understand it now. two years later tho. Ended up buying the morakniv garberg if i remember correctly, also does a great job with better looks :)
@@mikkihintikka7273 not as much as i would have expected. I was not able to travel as much because of covid, but when i was out in the woods or for many other tasks in my daily life, it was very useful and is still my go to knife.
Hi Kayakwinds, I Have never head the term rat tailed tang, god expression. I do agree that "rat tailed" is not the same thing as full tang, I think in another video I called it penetrating tang. the reason I say it here is that Terävä say it is a full tang. But ur right is not. Were I am not sure I agree is that you state that it is often too weak, I have never heard of a "rat tailed Tang" that was weak, many uses this method, including Fällkniven and Mora
The Marine K-bar has a rat tailed tang and some people have complained that the tang is prone to break when that kind of knife is batoned. Clearly there is a lot less mental in that sort of tang. Consider how much narrower the profile of the knife is at the handle. Of course, depending upon the quality of the steel,some rat tailed knives will be stronger than others. Problems may arise when processing wood.
Kayakwinds , hmmmm interesting, but if the tang i the same wide as the blade, i think that it will be as strong as the full tang, but elseI agree, interesting with the ka-bar, ill keep it in mind 😀🇩🇰
How it is called differs. In the USA they call any tang that runs all the way through a full tang. I disagree. IMO a full tang is where you see the tang on both sides of the handle. Often they have some cutout in the tang (skeletonized) to reduce weight and increase the balance or have it tapered down (it gets thinner). A rat tail tang is a hidden tang that sticks inside the handle or runs all the way through but gets smaller at the top like most Mora's and older Puuko's have. A stick tang is usually broader (stronger) but not visible and does not run all the way through, like Hultafors. Fallkniven calls their tang a protruding stick tang, meaning that it is a stick tang but runs all the way through and is visible at the end of the handle. I would classify this Puukko also as a protruding stick tang because from the pictures on their website you can see that is stays broad all the way and does not taper down like a rat tail. Just my 2 cents.
Hej David, ok en M07, lige nummeret kortere end M95, sikkert også en lækker størrelse. Ja sammenligning, der var også en tideligere der spurgte om det samme. Normalt er jeg jo ikke vild med direkte sammenligninger da der jo er behov, pris, anvendelse osv. der spiller ind, hvorfor direkte sammenligning er svær. Men jeg vil sige som tideliger, Peltonen har en mere lang og smalt blad, mere combat kniv og Sissipuukko'en er en direkte Bushcraft, men begge dog fine all around. Så kort hvis jeg var militærmand og skulle have en all around bushkniv ville jeg vælge Peltonen, hvis jeg var ren Bushcraft mand ville jeg vælge Puukko'en
hi there. can you please translate this conversation into english? i just get a few words, sorry. it would be very appreciated.. the m07 was my first decent knife and i am very curious whether it was a bargain through the time :). especially with its flat grind opposing this scandi one.. thanks a lot, btw, you make great and highly informational videos. with best wishes mjk
m.j.k. Hi there sure I can, and it is rude of us Scandinavias to go into our language. We talk about a comparison between the terävä and the pentelton m95 and which one is the best, and like I say, I really don't like to directly compare knifes, there are function, price, type and many more things that makes it difficult. But if I were to conclude it is that the pentelton is slimmer and made for military, and the terävä is made for bushcraft. So if I were a military man (paramilitary) I would chose m95, if I were a buchcrafter I would chose terävä
oh, just like you mentioned before. thank you nevertheless.. as for me, i put the m07 through some punishing tests and it held its own like "sorry, you try what? just don´t injure yourself boy"... such a great knife. thanks for your respond
I received my Jakaaripuuko Terava 140 yesterday. Be warned guys, I'm 'Very' dissapointed, it's really badly ground on one side near to the tip so the tip is misshapen, and also on the other side near to the handle. Maybe the company is doing so well that they've ran out of suitably skilled staff because my knife looks like it was made by an apprentice who started late on the day it was made. My initial impression when I unboxed it was 'CHEAP'. To be fair the sheath is very well made but I can't feel any affinity at all for the knife. The handle is just like a cheap bread knife's. Not saying it won't do the job but it feels absolutely bog-standard to me. I've got no dog in the fight between knife manufacturers but I really wish I'd put my cash into a Mora Garberg Carbon, I went to check one out today in one of the Military Shops they have here, (Poland), and I could really feel the quality in my hand. i'll put the Terava on ebay when I return to the UK. I'm going to copy and paste this comment on other pages. 'VERY DISSAPOINTED"
Hi David, That is NOT OK, and to be honest it is the first time I hear that from anybody. I think it sounds like a bad knife you have got. why dont you contact the seller store and make them take it return??? The garberg is a fine knife to though. if you cant get the store to look at it. maybe i can set my Contact in Finland in contact with you?
Bummer. Seems you got the one in a million bad one. I have 4 blades fron this manufacturer and not a single one has a bad grind or is cheap or whatever you say yours is. Also there is a hundred videos on this blade, all saying how well made they are and totally awesome.. haha Im picking you are a troll?. Or just an idiot??.
bashfulbrother, I know that some of the videos may sound a little, and when there is wind it is worse, but this is as high as my camera can record 😀 Must take a look at a better camera
I've had the chance to play with mine some and find it to be an excellent all around knife. What surprised me is how well it chops. The knife isn't heavy but the 5" blade can really go to work chopping. I'm not a metal guru, but the steel seems to hold a sharp edge through much use. Touch ups are easy on either a ceramic rod or just via light stropping. Finally, the sheath is excellent. I wish all knives came with such a well constructed sheath. For the approximately $50 US I paid, this is an excellent heavy duty bushcraft knife!
Crash Johnson, hi I totally agree, great heavy duty bush knife for 50$, Best buy
@@Thoristesting hej Thor! Jag står i valet mellan en garberg carbon och den finska kniven du testar som är 140. Villet skulle du välja och isåfall varför skulle du välja den? Jag kommer mest ha den till att ta med mig i skogen för att göra upp eld, men även kunna försvara mig om ett djur kommer osv
Kör den stora. Den är inte klumpig. Bra grepp i kallt väder, funkar bra även att hugga med. Grymt bra stål, jag kör lite kokosolja på min. Den är helt skottsäker och funkar säkert bra att försvara sig med👍
Thor,
This is the first of your videos I have watched. It was truly refreshing to watch some one who knows how to get the best use out of a medium sized knife blade when chopping with it. When you rotated that branch and chopped it circumferentially I thought, "Finally a knife reviewer who knows how to think and get the best use out of a tool!" Watching many other knife tests/reviews it is painful to see how they only work one way, and not always the smartest, with getting through lumber. I've even seen some who, I swear, don't grasp that heat from a fire Goes Up! Like I said, Painful.
I have subscribed and plan to check out many more of your evals.
I have been looking at the JaakariPuukos for some time now, debating whether I should get the 110 or the 140. You have helped me decide on the 140 today. Thank you.
Kelly Moulton, thx and I totally agree, i do think the 140 is more versatile, but have not tried the 110 yet 😀
U can say jaegar knife instead of jääkäri puukko because ITS the same thing
Bonjour, le 110 est très bon aussi et plus facile à ranger dans un sac....😉
The late Mors Kochanski had a good definition for a survival knife. For cold weather you need a good handle. Isolated and big, so you don't touch the metal.
I picked one up (sadly without the sheath due to limited financial issues) a couple ofmonths ago. I wish I had it when I first started 'woodsrunnin' over 50 years ago. Darn fine blade! Now I'll have to make a good sheath to replace the old one I had available.
'stay safe keep warm have fun and whittle to keep your sanity'
ol greybeard dino
; - ) >
Doug Duncan , well the knife is the most important, lol, though it is a nice made sheet. But again sheets are durable to make :)
Nice quote, I'll remember that. Stay jolly
Yep as a matter of fact I like to point out how tall a pile of wood chips I got out back to prove my 'sanity' 😉.
:)
For many years I have the 140 in SS
I sharpened it to zero grind
It is a most amazing field knife
The balance is superb exactly at the handle so with the zero grind I can do fine carving as if it was a whittling knife
And then also it chops and splits
Great review, as are all your reviews!
I got one in June, so far I love mine, great trail knife!
It A Cool trail knife, I just got my hands on the littlebrother the 110 that I have to test :)
Glad to hear somebody else is also using bush knife instead of bushcraft knife. ;)
LOL, i did not even notice,
I really enjoy your videos and I get a lot of information from them. I subscribed.Thank you and keep it up!
thx. I will :)
I'm like #600. I Love that knife and your review. I hope to own one someday.
I'm waiting on mine: ordered it last week. Nice review and a very fine knife.
You wont regred it 😀, thx
Thanks for the review. Ordered one
adamdarby43, 👋, you won't regret it 👍😀✌️
I just got the 110 in last week. still want to try it on wood but it's a super nice knife and the leather sheath is also excellent!
Id like to get my hands on the 110 and try that out to :)
That knife isn’t intended for chopping, other than that, this is all the knife you’ll ever need.
Useful video. thank you. I was trying to decide between the 110 and 140 knife
Hi Frank,
Have not tried the 110, but what is it mostly for, Camp og Bush?
+Thor-is-testing closer to Bush knife.
+Frank Gonzalez, Then the 140 is ur Darling 😊
Excellent review brother, now if I could actually buy one that would be also excellent LOL The knife is so popular I don't we will ever see them restocked enough to ever own one for ourselves. The price is amazing and IMHO a better product than Mora's Garburg.
Thx. I agree the terävä really gives value for money :)
Thor-is-testing Its funny cause I ended up buying the Garberg just after my comment here 4 months ago. I've been using it for my edc and its a really good knife, Mora did an excellent job IMO on the handle design. At first I wasn't to sold on their choice of material but after 3months of daily work the handle gets smooth and very comfortable, its also tough as nails.
I plan on getting that 140 cause the 110 is to close to the Garberg size, I think the extra length is perfect, esp for batoning and clearing limbs.
the garberg is also a very nice knife, I have not testede it but I have used it :) The Terävä is a bit more "primitive" and gung ho, and a bit bigger than the Garberg as you point out, I think you will love it :)
Good knife and video too. Thank you my friend.
Thx. Mister Smith, Yes It is a great knife, speciale in the bush, can only recomend it :)
hey. if you could only pick one, which youll choose? the Jääkäripuukko 140 or the M95?
Great vid dude, just subscribed. And also bought one of the stainless steel versions of this knife. Bad influence!!
LOL, thx, and sorry bout the bad Influence, just blame me. I can take it :)
Thank you for the video.
HerosEnd, 👍
In the Video I say that the knife is 100€, that is how it goes when you are off the grid. It is only 60€ which is a great deal
www.varusteleka.com/en/product/terava-jaakaripuukko-140-w-leather-sheath/33532
The 110 is all out until 3 weeks out...but I'm thinking the 140 seems better for things like this, seems a bit more versatile at the cost of some dexterity in doing some tasks like shaving wood. J.P. Peltonen makes a good one for rangers but it's about twice as expensive
PeuraPitkä, I agree, the 140 is probably more visible, but I have not yet have the privilege to have the 110 in hand, but I hear it's nice to. I love the peneltonen to, as I recall it not that much more than the 140, but I could be wrong
Terävä means sharp and puukko Is knife and jääkäri jaegar
Thanks. 'jaeger' means hunter in German. So, Terävä Jääkäripuukko apparently means 'sharp hunting knife' or 'sharp hunter knife'. :-)
@@ExperiencingNature actually jaeger means infantry in our language. @Perttu Hurskainen. the whole name is sharp infantry knife :P
i have the 110 and 140 and i have to say i like the size of the 140 better. The 110 will be my beater knife and ill keep the 140 on my hip. Sandpapered the heat treat off and im not sure what i like better... with heat treat or not. Its a great knife though. the handle geometry is great and feels great. The sheath is outstanding for the cost of this knife. Does it look like a bark river or ltwr knife? No, but this knife wasnt build to show off. It was built to use and get things done with. Great purchase. buy one if you can.
Is the handle more of a hard plastic or more of a rubber?
It's a little hard to hear you, I still could. Great job on the video. Keep them coming. Kudo's Bro.
I know, in the later videos I have a better camera and mic :)
Finnish quality !!!! 🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮
I am from Qatar, how do I buy this knife and how much is it?
great looking knife
I have a hultafors HD. I will have to will have to watch your review.
Which knife would you chose between the jaakarri puukko 140 & The J.p paltenton?
Kind regards
Lee
The 110 and 140 look like great knives. I have several bushcraft style knives, but usually go with my scandi styled ones as they seem to work best with what I do. I'm kind of torn between the 140 and the kellam fang. In your opinion, how would these compare? Signed, your newest subscriber.
Hi Michael, thats a tough one, it kind of depends on what you like, the terävä is a better knife i think, it is like the producers say, a no bullshit knife, no dikidi just knife, full tang and a great durabel grind. The fang on the other hand is a well made, no dought, and it is a beauty, and I would were it anytime. So going out on the town I would chose the Fang, and it will dominans well, but in the Bush I would go with the Terävä 😀🇩🇰
Thor-is-testing Just got my 140 in the mail. It's an amazing knife, so well balanced it feels and works like a much smaller knife. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Michael Demers, np its a great knife
Harpiks er resin på engelsk/Harpiks is resin in english. Sap er saft/sap is saft. Keep up the good videos
😎👌 thx
Im thinking about geting that one or the morakniv garberg
What is better ?
The Terävä 140 vs Garberg.... UHHH that is a hard one. if it was only knife to knife I must admid I love the Terävä they are so no bullshit knife, and has never let me down. but I think objective they are the same quality. though Terävä has a very nice leather sheath and Garberg has the Multimount sheath.
Dose that help?
@@Thoristesting yeah it helped alot but i forgot to answear😅
Decidet to just buy both
Hello. I have this knife and its great. But I like to see a comparison video with j p peltonen m95 if it's possible. As I can see they are similars. Does it worth to buy M95 if I already have these knife? Best regards.
j ai le terava jaakaripuuko 140 et je l adore . vraiment génial.
essdanitof , im sure ur right 😀
its only 72 cad before shipping so like.. 85 shipped to canada u said 100 euro thats 140 cad so your a little off on the price.. those knives are great value, good video!
Hi, Natsyrt, Yes I know, I made a comment about it below, when ur off the grid, u have to try to remember, and aparently I was off with the price, I agree, GREAT value for money
You should try testing the Condor Dundee Bowie. talk about it nice big knife. I have yet to find anything that can chop better than this.
franco annoni , 👋 there, I really like the condore knifes, so I will definitely take a look at it when I start reviewing international knifes. but I guess that will be soon, almost through the Scandinavian
Why? This review is not about the Condor. Don't waste his time.
terävä skrama 200. same maker but bigger
That is a big puukko
chibraxial , 😜👍
chibraxial That's what she said
Michael Demers lol
Sap..pitch ...pine rosin...or that damn goo from Pine trees that sticks to everything
LOL, yes but it can be used to many things :)
each to his own but i prefer a small ax or hatchet for chopping or a machete-type knife,
Hi Dick, I agree, but I also want to know what the tool, I normaly, have with me can handle. thats why it is important to be if it can chop.If I have acces to a hatchet, id use that anyday :)
understood, agreed, thanks for your reply,
What say y'all? Stainless or Carbon? Stainless seems less desirable.
Bushcraft Beats , well carbon is easier to sharpen, but stainless is more a use and forget blade, if u take care of blade after every use, carbon should be good. But if u use u knife I costal area with lots of salt, stainless might be better 😀 my opion
In my experience, stainless is harder and more brittle. Is that accurate, or am I tripping?
I dont know about brittle, but i do think stainless stell is harder. But im not sure
yes i think you are right and i also think the carbon steel got more bite to it.if you know what i mean.
In use carbon blade should be superior but in terms of taking care of it stainless is superior. Note: You probably have to sharpen stainless more often though. However, it is not quite this simple as there are a huge variety to both blade types. I would get carbon for myself but I am more of a traditional guy :)
Thor, which do you prefer, the Jaakaripuukko 140 cm. or the Peltonen M95? They are both similar knives, designed for the same role. It is therefor reasonable to do a direct comparison. I have both, and, whilst they are each superb, I think that the Jaakaripuukko is that little bit better.
Hej Anthony, thats a dificult one, they are similar, but different in 2 ways i think. The m95 is a military knife, and hens slimmer and more combat knife. the terävä is a bush knife broader with a wider grind. So if I neede a combat knife i World go with the m95, but as a bushcrafter i would go with the terävä.
Also I use firesteel a lot, and the m95 is coatede and Can not be usede with firesteel. So a littel favor toward terävä. BUT they i both great knife, and I would trust my life with both
Thor, Thanks very much for this considered and helpful reply - I would agree.
Nice video. Why do you strike the firesteel with the cutting edge? That is damaging for the knife.
Thk Paulo, I would never use the cutting edge for firesteel, take a look again and see that I use the back of the knife
@@Thoristesting I looked again, you are right! 🙈
Paolo Lindeman 😀👍
Hello, I am deciding between Mora carbon Garber and jääkäripuukko 140. Which one would you reccomen to me?
Halo Jaka, a hard one because I realy do like Mora. that said, between those 2 knifes I would chose the 140 any day :)
@@Thoristesting Good, I already ordered 110 and get it today hopefully. Regards from Slovenia.
Thanks Thor and I will get Me one .
really good knife for $
In your opinion, how does this one compare to the J.P. Peltonen M95?
I've been using the M95 for almost 20 years now, I'm exceedingly happy with it and I was wondering if the Jääkäripuukko 140 would be even better.
Hi Dimetropteryx, sr for the late answer, i have been off the grid, this point have been pointed out in some of the other comments :) but generel they are both awsome knifes, about the same size and quality, the way they differ is that the M95 is more slim, and have a finer edge, also it is coated so it can't be used with firesteel. I think if your a militaryman or some sort paramilitary organisation, i think the M95 is the best, if your a bushcrafter i think the Terävä is better :)
Thanks for the reply. :)
I suppose I am a bushcrafter. Haven't had much use for my firesteel yet, I'm still running around with matches. I have the oldest model of the M95, which has a rounded spine, so using it to strike sparks is definitely out of the question. The oldest model was also blued instead of teflon coated.
Both are made by Laurin Metalli.
@@Dimetropteryx same steel workshop does both so they might be pretty equal
@@mikkihintikka7273 That says a lot about the craftsmanship, but I was, and still am, more interested in the design.
I'm living in swizerland and I would buy the tärävä 140. But I dont know Can I import it to swizerland?
If it is legal to have in Switzerland than sure. They will ship it.
Yes you can. I ordered mine from Varusteleka and received it 3 days later.
How hard is it to keep the rust off compared to 1095
Hi Trey, Hmmmm that depends on how you take care of your knifes, normally I tend to like Canbon vs Steinless steel in that it is easy to sharpen. but like you say, it have a tendency to rust. but if you clean your knife after using it and keep it oiled i have no problem with rust,
though another carbon knife i had, i cut som appels for a Mose, and that made rust stains within hours, so thats something to think of
I love the knife, but do you know about a knife, which is as good as this knife, but looks better? It just looks awful in my opinion.
Hi Timo, Yup the finnish guys how makes these take a pride in, that it is a no bullshit knife, looks dont matter only functions :)Take a look at Casström, Lars Fält kniven, awesome beautiful knife :)
it looks like cheap knife but it isnt. thats why its so beautiful
@@mikkihintikka7273 i understand it now. two years later tho. Ended up buying the morakniv garberg if i remember correctly, also does a great job with better looks :)
@@timozoch7642 Se o hieno veitsi. Ooks käyttäny paljo?
@@mikkihintikka7273 not as much as i would have expected. I was not able to travel as much because of covid, but when i was out in the woods or for many other tasks in my daily life, it was very useful and is still my go to knife.
I infer that the knife does have a full tang, but is it a rat tailed tang. Rat tailed tangs are, all too often, weak.
Hi Kayakwinds, I Have never head the
term rat tailed tang, god expression. I do agree that "rat tailed" is
not the same thing as full tang, I think in another video I called it penetrating
tang. the reason I say it here is that Terävä say it is a full tang. But ur
right is not. Were I am not sure I agree is that you state that it is often too
weak, I have never heard of a "rat tailed Tang" that was weak, many
uses this method, including Fällkniven and Mora
The Marine K-bar has a rat tailed tang and some people have complained that the tang is prone to break when that kind of knife is batoned. Clearly there is a lot less mental in that sort of tang. Consider how much narrower the profile of the knife is at the handle. Of course, depending upon the quality of the steel,some rat tailed knives will be stronger than others. Problems may arise when processing wood.
Kayakwinds , hmmmm interesting, but if the tang i the same wide as the blade, i think that it will be as strong as the full tang, but elseI agree, interesting with the ka-bar, ill keep it in mind 😀🇩🇰
Jääkäripuukko is full tang. They say it on their website and you can also see it when looking at the knife.
How it is called differs. In the USA they call any tang that runs all the way through a full tang. I disagree. IMO a full tang is where you see the tang on both sides of the handle. Often they have some cutout in the tang (skeletonized) to reduce weight and increase the balance or have it tapered down (it gets thinner). A rat tail tang is a hidden tang that sticks inside the handle or runs all the way through but gets smaller at the top like most Mora's and older Puuko's have. A stick tang is usually broader (stronger) but not visible and does not run all the way through, like Hultafors. Fallkniven calls their tang a protruding stick tang, meaning that it is a stick tang but runs all the way through and is visible at the end of the handle. I would classify this Puukko also as a protruding stick tang because from the pictures on their website you can see that is stays broad all the way and does not taper down like a rat tail. Just my 2 cents.
Super video thor :)! Ku være spænende hvordan du ville sammenligne den med M95 sissipuukko'en du også har en video på, jeg har lige bestilt en m07
Hej David, ok en M07, lige nummeret kortere end M95, sikkert også en lækker størrelse. Ja sammenligning, der var også en tideligere der spurgte om det samme. Normalt er jeg jo ikke vild med direkte sammenligninger da der jo er behov, pris, anvendelse osv. der spiller ind, hvorfor direkte sammenligning er svær. Men jeg vil sige som tideliger, Peltonen har en mere lang og smalt blad, mere combat kniv og Sissipuukko'en er en direkte Bushcraft, men begge dog fine all around. Så kort hvis jeg var militærmand og skulle have en all around bushkniv ville jeg vælge Peltonen, hvis jeg var ren Bushcraft mand ville jeg vælge Puukko'en
hi there. can you please translate this conversation into english? i just get a few words, sorry. it would be very appreciated.. the m07 was my first decent knife and i am very curious whether it was a bargain through the time :). especially with its flat grind opposing this scandi one..
thanks a lot, btw, you make great and highly informational videos.
with best wishes
mjk
m.j.k. Hi there sure I can, and it is rude of us Scandinavias to go into our language.
We talk about a comparison between the terävä and the pentelton m95 and which one is the best, and like I say, I really don't like to directly compare knifes, there are function, price, type and many more things that makes it difficult.
But if I were to conclude it is that the pentelton is slimmer and made for military, and the terävä is made for bushcraft. So if I were a military man (paramilitary) I would chose m95, if I were a buchcrafter I would chose terävä
oh, just like you mentioned before. thank you nevertheless.. as for me, i put the m07 through some punishing tests and it held its own like "sorry, you try what? just don´t injure yourself boy"... such a great knife.
thanks for your respond
m.j.k. This knife can take it 😀
Is it from Sweden?
Yep :) the Smålanske Highland :)
Thor-is-testing
Thank you. Wonderful knives!
Kumbanigash, thx, yes they are?
The knife is not from Sweden. It is from Finland.
jonnenne ahhh i see the question is not were it is taken but the knife, ur right there it is from finland
I received my Jakaaripuuko Terava 140 yesterday. Be warned guys, I'm 'Very' dissapointed, it's really badly ground on one side near to the tip so the tip is misshapen, and also on the other side near to the handle. Maybe the company is doing so well that they've ran out of suitably skilled staff because my knife looks like it was made by an apprentice who started late on the day it was made. My initial impression when I unboxed it was 'CHEAP'. To be fair the sheath is very well made but I can't feel any affinity at all for the knife. The handle is just like a cheap bread knife's. Not saying it won't do the job but it feels absolutely bog-standard to me. I've got no dog in the fight between knife manufacturers but I really wish I'd put my cash into a Mora Garberg Carbon, I went to check one out today in one of the Military Shops they have here, (Poland), and I could really feel the quality in my hand. i'll put the Terava on ebay when I return to the UK. I'm going to copy and paste this comment on other pages. 'VERY DISSAPOINTED"
Hi David, That is NOT OK, and to be honest it is the first time I hear that from anybody. I think it sounds like a bad knife you have got. why dont you contact the seller store and make them take it return??? The garberg is a fine knife to though. if you cant get the store to look at it. maybe i can set my Contact in Finland in contact with you?
Bummer. Seems you got the one in a million bad one. I have 4 blades fron this manufacturer and not a single one has a bad grind or is cheap or whatever you say yours is. Also there is a hundred videos on this blade, all saying how well made they are and totally awesome.. haha Im picking you are a troll?. Or just an idiot??.
@david mckeown
Send the knife back and quit complaining.
You need to turn up your volume when you are recording your videos. I can barely hear you.
bashfulbrother, I know that some of the videos may sound a little, and when there is wind it is worse, but this is as high as my camera can record 😀
Must take a look at a better camera
this is caĺled "design"
Maija Suomivuori, agreed 😬👍