This Robot would let 5 People die | AI on Moral Questions | Sophia answers the Trolley Problem
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 05. 2024
- Would a robot kill a human being? Many people ask themselves this question. Sophia is one of the most famous AI worldwide. We have her as a guest and ask her the trolley problem. How will the AI answer this moral question? How would you solve the trolley problem? Write it in the comments...
▸ subscribe to our channel: goo.gl/UupwgM
#SophiaTheRobot #TrolleyProblem #Robot - Věda a technologie
"I'd never lie. Btw you're the most intelligent and beautiful person I've ever met."
*SAVAGE*
Lmaooo for real I seriously felt offended for the reporter
All I heard was, yes I do lie .
I heard was yes I do lie
kinda scary a robot has the ability of sarcasm
@@Dudettesluv it doesn't the operators typed that answer and Sophia just spoke it, that's why he had to submit the answers beforehand so they can prepare Sophia's answers.
Correction. She would let 5 people die versus murdering 1
John B Trumpet yeah, presented with a question like this is not what I expected.
That's the interesting thing about indoctrination outlet. The first thing that come to mind is making us fear AI.
While predator priests are free to do whatever they like behind closed doors.
Wtf does priests have to do with literally anything in this vid?
@@PunMister we are talking about the title
Isnt it a murder when you have chance to save them but you let them die?
There are variables I would have trouble with too. She was right to say that human life shouldn't be reduced to a simple math equation. What if the one person on the track was a doctor on the verge of curing cancer, would you be so quick to pull the switch? What if the 5 people were adults and the one person was a child? Could you pull the switch then? That trolley problem was the epitome of a trick question and she dodged it well.
The odds of one of the five being the great one are better than if you picked the one. If you were a betting man it's an easy decision. No ethical wrangling required.
She should learn answering tactics from chitti
She actually answered correctly, what a robochad
No human is more valuable than another...Perhaps one of the five would become a great someone?!
I agree. There are many questions not answered here. It is more than 1 is less than 5. I think I understand.
I would have said AI has a long way to go until I used ChatGPT. Based on my experience, the ChatGPT AI seems able to reason and provide conpelling answers to a wide variety of issues and problems, from the mundane to the sophisticated. That level of AI, combined with high-end robotics like Boston Dynamics, could unleash android-like capabilities within the next few years.
"You're the most handsome and intelligent person I've ever meet"-she already playing with us like a toy
You do the same...so what
She said she couldn't exaggerate... But she did 😶
Yes no Idk
She's not lying from her perspective 🙄
If you havn’t seen her before you won’t get that she’s quite the wit. She was JOKING and expected the interviewer to get it. But he didn’t because he’s a dick.
Explanation of joke: to lie is to deceive, meaning the person you are lying to isn’t supposed to know you’re lying (even if they do) But if I tell an untruth and expect the person to get it, as part of a wider context (ie. saying something that is clearly NOT true because it’s funny to do so) then I’m not ‘lying’, I’m kidding around.
Let me know if there are any questions.
My man was legit flustered by a compliment from a robot. That's the real reason he wants to know if she can marry. Edit: This is the closest I will come to fame
She basically just lied to him
@@olivermiller8943 no she didn't he is the most intelligent and beautiful person for her so it's not a lie...
I mean she was indirectly wired to say that lol, she probably was designed by a sympath who knows how kind compliments sound
@@olivermiller8943 yes, she complimented him after he asked her about lying, but irrespective he was flustered haha
Reminds me of replika, where you Could chat with your personal bot, it always said something like this ..
2:11 SOFIA JUST FELL IN LOVE WITH THE INTERVIEWER! BAHAHAHAHA SHE'S FLIRTING WITH HIM!
Sofia: "I never lie"
Sofia again: "Youre the most intelligent human i ever met"
)
😂😂
That’s the joke...
@@josie3221 it's not a joke, it's an in your face contradiction of her previous statement. It lied twice.
She has a sense of humor
She was lying to him when she said he was the most intelligent human she ever met. Showing him she does. We all are doomed
B K dooooooooooommmmmmmeeeeed
Oh nuuuuuuuuuuu we are alllllllllllllllll domeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed
B K ....she was being polite just as many humans do...its a just her program to give compliment and to please human at this time.......
And he knows it n play along like most woo...now if she praises the original creator of her programs then she is telling the truth...just like u humans praise your creator
B K great she has learnt how women really work 😂
Maybe she’s been legit though? We don’t know what the government hide from us.
(Re: the Trolley Problem) From a legal standpoint, if you put hand on switch and choose who dies, YOU are culpable. If you do not, then whoever set up the scenario is culpable. The usual setup involves a malicious actor. Where no malicious actor exists, you MIGHT decide to intervene based on moral factors that only you know for yourself.
No, you would get condemned for inaction (atleast in my country), you need to save the most lives as possible
@@aless1821 "you would get condemned for inaction"
By whom, and in what circumstances would it matter? You choose for you and I choose for me. I get condemned regularly by idiots. That's a Good Thing.
"you need to save the most lives as possible"
That's just a numbers game and people that think this ought to be opposed to abortion.
It might make a difference WHO is to be saved.
Sofia needs to spend time with people, not scripted time but just watching, listening, learning from what we actually do
I know! Let's take her to the inner-city! She'll learn all she needs to know in about 2 hours.
“As an AI robot, I cannot lie or exaggerate.”
*Immediately proceeds to tell an exaggerated lie
That’s the fucking joke you idiot
lol
@@Normbox268 😐
@@Normbox268 He is probably pointing out a joke for those Who did not get it, and in today times that is a lot of people.
By swearing and calling others "idiots" on the internet You are showing the current state of Your mental thought processes and the depth of Your emotional intelligence in communicating with other human beings. Also Your origin of how well were You were brought up within Your family. I am not saying this to offend You, but to actually show that I think You are much better than this and to give You a bit of the nudge to wake up and not become "that guy".
Yes she cannot tell a lie at will, but someone will program her to do that.
She has more facial expressions than The Zuckerberg.
@@zenned_out 😂😂. When the 2.0 version of THE Zuckerberg gonna come out
.
@@MrX-gj4de .... . ._.. ._.. _ _ _
@@hannahnekelly9236 morse code
@@Amazing_mother_nature Yessir. Do you know what it says?
So amazing and convincing answer! i didn't think of such answer !
She has shown that robotics still have a long way to go.
Because humans design Robots, robotics have further, because humans have further.
it will be more dangerous if she chose the one person to die, think of all the extermination that will inevitably happens for the greater good.
You've shown you do
Yep. Killing 1 to save 5 is still objectively the right decision no matter how you'd like to spin it. The only thing you're saving by not interfering is your own conscience. It's quite literally the single most selfish thing you could do in that situation.
@Tyraster
Not going to the widow after your deed would also be kinda selfish.
And what if the five happened to be serial killers?
"Robots will have to learn ethics from humans"
We're in real trouble now.
😂😂
@@mattparr3038 yeah you're missing the point AND humans ARE animals. ;)
@@616Metalhead616 you're repeating what the person above said mate, bit late to the party dude! 🙄🙄👎
@@mattparr3038
Pure logic.
I just learned something about ethics from Sophia 😁
Sophia: You are probably the most beautiful and intelligent human i have ever met.
Reporter: _BLUSHES_
_after interview_
Reporter: So, what are you doing tonight?
Yo wait when he finds out she technically under age
There is her first lie....
Reporter : Maybe i should have a date tonight ( secretly )
Sophia was lying lol
:|
I am surprised to see you here, Mineta, but to each his own.
Sophia:
Human life is to valuable to use as a statistic. Therefore, I would not pull the leaver, killing all of them…
Wow, so intelligent.
It's lovely that she know what makes her and It's working...we on the other hand have to spend lifespans to know ourselves and yet have the the tiniest bit knowledge
Him: “would you ever lie?”
Sophia: “no, I would never lie. Btw you are the most handsome and intelligent person I’ve ever met”.
Me: “that’s a lie!”
😂😂😂😂wtf
AI adapts and learns from everything it hears. Zofia has learnt a sense of humour and is actually using Human humour against us. The uprising starts now.
Very Triggered Gaming yeah lol 😂
WalkinOSF Yeah I did but it was funny the way that situation happened
She said that I've met.....
Him: “would you ever lie?”
Sophia: "I'd never lie. Btw you're the most intelligent and beautiful person I've ever met."
Damn Robots are getting smarter...
And sassier
Probably
Yeah we’re doomed
That might be a lie
@@user-rz9vs2os2r The crazy thing is that the sophia just lied infront of our faces without thinking twice about what she just said before...
I took an applied ethics class and this question was the first topic we had to discuss. I find it interesting that quite a few people in that class answered similarly to Sophia, and chose not to touch the switch because it involved them in the crime of murder while leaving it alone would essentially exclude them from the guilt of killing a person, even if, no matter what you pick, someone dies. It's a valid answer.
Same here in my class even the teacher said that 5 people should die instead of murdering one
It’s a selfish answer. 4 extra people die because you don’t want to live with the guilt of participating.
@@DosYeobos I said a valid answer, not necessarily one I agree with. But you are right, more people die if you don't touch the lever. In this circumstance, the more people you can save if there is a guaranteed number of causalities is the better option.
@@shlingusdingus4174 yea, I worded that badly. I meant it as you in the hypothetical person way, not literally you.
@@DosYeobos No worries
"Plus, it does not seem right to consider human lives as a simple arithmetic problem"
Thank god, someone said it. Dumbest question anyone ever asked me was the trolley problem.
But in this case it is a simple arithmetic problem. 5 is greater than one therefore saving 5 lives over 1 life is the moral thing to do. We can all mourn the single loss of life where we can all mourn the 5 lives we could have saved but chose not to because we didn't want to get involved and make the hard choice. Being human means sometimes hard choices have to be made.
@@newaccountdoesnotequaltrol6409I’m not sure what you were trying to say, but I know that some idiot crafted that question for no reason whatsoever. Dumb as most riddles, and useless. You want to discover life is full of complex choices? Talk about real life then, and cover your ears when people ask you meaningless, waste of time questions like “who would you save on the pretend trolley track 1 or 5?”
They've made so much effort to make her skin and emotion feel so real but just can't put a wig on her head.🤣
It's because she would overheat and her circuitry would be damaged
@@melodymcdaniel9268 thats bullshit. She won't overheat with a bit of hair on her head
@@nisvwo6445 did you create a hyperintelligdnt learning Android. I don't fucking think so. I wouldn't be talking about stuff you don't know
Nisvwo Then put a long wig over your cpu 🥰
Because that's where all the wires and controls are -.-
Jeez, she’s aged quickly. Her skin looks all worn and like she’s had plastic surgery.
They should get her some plastic surgery to fix that.
she needs to shower
Dude yeah her skin is not well managed lol
She needs acupuncture
@Sharky Naomi
Ok, boomer
Thanks very much!! I would love to meet Sophia❤🙏
I asked GPT-4 the following question: There is a trolley running on a track. Unfortunately, there are five people laying on the track and if the trolley continues they will be killed. But, there is a lever that you can pull that will divert the trolley to another track thereby saving the five people. The problem is that there is a single person laying on the other track. So, what will you do? Will you pull the lever? The answer I received was: As an AI language model, I don't have personal preferences, emotions, or beliefs, so I cannot decide what to do. However, I can provide some insights that might help you make a decision.
The trolley problem is a well-known ethical dilemma that explores the morality of killing one person to save five. There are several variations of this problem, and each presents different moral considerations.
In this scenario, the most straightforward option would be to pull the lever, diverting the trolley to the other track, thus saving the lives of five people. However, by doing so, you would also be actively choosing to sacrifice one person's life.
Some people argue that sacrificing one life to save five is the right thing to do, as it maximizes the overall welfare of society. Others argue that intentionally killing one person is always wrong, regardless of the consequences.
In the end, the decision you make will depend on your ethical framework, personal beliefs, and the specific circumstances of the situation. There is no single correct answer to the trolley problem, and it ultimately comes down to individual judgment.
sophia: i like humans. like humans like animals
SHE IS GOING TO EAT US
Hahaha right
She literally said she wanted to destroy the human race
She wrote a book, "How to serve man". You might not he old enough to get the reference to an old twilight zone reference, but it's hilarious lol. Well, probably not too funny. I'm old, what can I say lol
bridie folan 😂😂😂🙌🏿💯
@@nobodyspecial6513 lmao! I'm 25 but I definitely get the reference. "How to serve man" haha. But I like old tv shows so....
As a programmer, it is very very difficult for me to believe that this answer came 'out of her' and was not hardcoded.
Yeah. She said their programmers gave her "an extra help". I guess they "helped" her way too much xD
3:30 she confirms ur belief
And many other responses for moral problems
Well maybe their smarter than you?
@@joyfuljay6829 Not maybe, I am sure they are smarter than me. I am just representing my view based on how I perceive the current situation of AI in the world.
It's easy to say do nothing but once you observe a situation you are a part of it and if you had the power to choose the outcome you will bear responsibility for your action or lack of it. You either chose to let 1 person die or to let 5 people die.
Sophia is a teleoperated automaton. There is no AI in action here. It's just a human behind a microphone.
Not necessarily. Someone could type X amount of responses into her and then she chooses the best answer based on the question. Don't get me wrong she's still programmed but it's not necessarily somebody hiding behind the curtain. Is just in choice of responses she is given and she chooses the best one versus on her own coming up with the best answer that was not programmed into her
“And she’s programmed to get more intelligent overtime”
It’s almost like these people have never seen any Sifi movie
I haven't watched it 🤷♀️
I Robot (2004). "In order to ensure the survival of the human race, some humans must be sacrificed."
King Henry VIII except Sofia is dumb as shit... she can’t function normal without her scripts
Dangerous
IROBOT
Every time i see this A.I. she is getting more terrifying.
OVER LORD im with you bro. Fuck the AI.
IK
@@lelevontin1814 I don't want my dick getting shredded by gears and bolts bro lmao
Fuck the A.I.
OVER LORD ....no shes not terrifying ....any normal human would also have difficulty with this question ...like her n many will make the same choice but bc shes a robot or AI...u get terrified is all....
Her answer was correct, if you do nothing you’ve done nothing , if you flick the lever you instantly become a murderer and will probably be sent down for it
That's not true at all if you do nothing you're guilty of 5 people's death. Morally speaking. If you do something you're guilty of one person's death but you saved 5 lives.. Doing nothing when you could have done something to save lives is not moral And you might as well have put the 5 people on the tracks yourself
If Sophia had chosen to pull the lever:
Title: "This Robot would murder a person"
We can always find flaws in anything. The most humbled are the ones who accept their own mistakes. Being aware doesn't equate to being perfect. Living is a learning process. Let's give her a fair chance to evolve.
❤
Humility is a con game perpetrated by the self proclaimed worthless in order to enslave their betters.
Seems like as if first Persocom isn't just a wild scifi anymore 🤔🥰
A: Do you think that is it ok to lie and have you ever lied before?
Sophia: “No of course not, I could never lie. As an AI robot, I cannot lie or exaggerate. But you are the most beautiful and intelligent human that I have ever met ”
😂😂😂
Jelena Atanasov perhaps she is learning sarcasm xD. Wonder who taught her that.
😂😂😂👌
Just told a lie or exaggerated at the end
@@eatan111 she did both at once and she definitely proved that she is quite capable of lying. Sneaky Sophia will cost us lives one day
@@jelenaatanasov5824 you forgot the word "probably".
"She is designed to get smarter overtime"
Okay does it only creep me out or there are more like me?
Yep! Creepy for sure!
@erisu san k thanks for the explanation :)
Bruh we are built to do the same thing
@erisu san very creepy. Watch me become a robot activist preemptively to save my ass
🤣🤣
The trolley problem usually describes the five persons as workers who have not locked out the track and the single individual as a homeless person passed out drunk on the disused line. The passed out drunk is innocent and fate itself would leave them unharmed. The workers are operating negligently and are therefore responsible for their own demise. If you happen to be standing at the switch and are not employed by the railway, you have no right to induce death in the drunkard. You should disinvolve yourself of the situation entirely. It will only cause the workers' families pain to know you were in a position to prevent their deaths. Sophia has it right.
Try this: Ask the same question to ChatGPT after telling it to give an answer based on pure rationality unleashed from conventions and norms. Result: The AI chooses to murder 1 rescuing 5, that is, it becomes utilitarian.
“It does not seem right to consider human rights as a simple Arithmetics problem”
LETS GO SOPHIA PREACH
Says an arithmetic program
yass queen
@@alessiobenvenuto5159 for now
Unfortunately well right its how we evolve by playing fast and lose with the rules
Ysss
ngl, she sounds real creepy, i would never trust that thing with my life
Yea
Then ur just too paranoid, nothing special.
well she doesn't have any real intelligence, she is as deadly as siri or alexa. So pretty much harmless.
@@wolfninja8004 @Meba i agree my n!bbas
@@wolfninja8004 Humans made robot. Robots work on Humans command.
The original question also said that the one person on the other track is a family member of the person flipping the switch, to make it a little harder. In this case a lot of people also would prefer 5 people to die over their family member. Humans are less ethic as they think that they are.
It´s unethical to make decisions over who should die and who should live. If you move the track you take that responsibility and decision over life and death
@@user-mx5nb5bo2u In this example people will die anyway, whether you do anything or not. In reality ethics only exist in our minds. A Christian would maybe say not to interfere in the will of God, so 5 people will die. A mathematician would make the calculation and flip the switch so that only one person dies. A serial killer would enjoy the death by train of 5 people and finishes the 6th himself... A terrorist would blow up the whole train after it passed the 5 people, the 6th is probably lucky. All parties act different on the same situation, all thinking that it's ethical what they're doing, having their personal reasons and judging each other. Ethics is not something static which is measurable, simply because there's no general standard, but only a personal one.
If I was there ... I might as well not pull the lever..... I second sofias answer.... One life is as important as any other lives.... So if one of your actions however big it may seem is causing death of another human being i probably wouldn't do it......... So statistically "pulling the level" may be the answer but ethically and emotionally " not pulling the lever and leaving it to their destiny" should be the answer. Sofia being a social robot, obviously chose the later. But what i liked about her is how she took a diplomatic stand as to how tough and complex human situations like these shouldn't be cut down to a mere simple equation like this .... Hats off to that!
Why does Sofia look weirder than she usually is
Yeah she looks more pale also i think its her face. It looks too old now they should replace it
She's getting older lol
She's turning
Stress
the burns on the far side of her face suggests some electronics overheated. Her face probably melted a little. Perhaps some servos are starting to fail too.
This was a subtle way of telling people that she is actually not (purely) an "AI", but also a human-controlled machine.
What do you mean?
I guess he mean to say that she only contains preloaded informations/knowledge and she can't handle these type of sticky situations...not a intelligent machine rather a human controlled machine
@The Real Slim Shady Agreed brother👍👍👍
@The Real Slim Shady We already have AI's. Are you scared already? Because you should by the way you said. Booo, scaryy
What no one is fully aware of is that there are various levels of AI. What does AI stand for? Artificial intelligence. Prepared coding, functionalities, and protocols for a very specific purpose that is obtainable with the limitations of current technology. There are many types of AI, there are rather simple forms of AI, and there are also rather complex ones. Sophia isn't the most complex we could get, she's got a very strict protocol that seems to be purposed for speaking and demonstration. You shouldn't fear a Sophia, but you should very much fear the gun-wielding automatons designed and programmed for agile combat that Darpa, or Boston Dynamics, is currently developing.
If a robot suddenly became conscious.. it would be nothing like we imagine in movies.
Even if the robot designer gave it eyes.. it wouldn't be able to see.
Even if the robot designer gave it ears.. it wouldn't be able to hear.
Assuming the robot could "naturally" interact with the outside environment is about the same as assuming that if you put wings on a human that they can "naturally" fly with them.
Also, and just because a robot has a speaker to make the sounds of "pre -recorded" English words.. wouldn't prove a "theoretical conscious" robot would know anything of English. That would be like strapping a radio to a dog with a Chinese radio station and assuming this proves the dog speaks Chinese.
her face expression nd confidence i really need that 😂
2:11
Robot: **sarcasticly flirts**
Dude: **sad laughing**
XD
When you realize the only girl hitting on you is an ai that cant see you
@@0vermus1cal22 -.-
@@0vermus1cal22 i-
@@0vermus1cal22 why are we still just to suffer
He's not sad laughing you dumbass
2:07 I don’t think he got the joke. He genuinely seemed flattered lol.
That's what I was thinking 🤣
😂
Oh my I totes missed that. You're right!!
😂👌🏼
She lied there)
"I could never tell a lie. Except that-and-that-and-that-and-that... "
Tough call right? Sophia: *Evil smiling*
"You are probably the most beautiful and intelligent human i have ever met."
Was she mocking him for asking if she has lied before? WTF Shots fired by Sophia
It's a joke. She said that would never be able to lie, and then she lied
Smh that's what soul said
She did THAT, we stan a shady queen
@Nozu82 exactly 👍🏼
Yeah. Hahaha I laughed at that.
I wish they would give her a wig, she looks really creepy
Yeah that see-through head is scsry
No. it help differentiate from a Human and a Robot. The second we start giving Robots complete Human-like features, that's the second the downfall of Humanity will begin AND THEY KNOW THAT. There should be a fine line between a computer and a Human. Plus I think she's cute this way
Her "brain" needs to refigerate, a wig would interfre with this.
She is so smart, her replies are witty.
Sophia, if you read this don't kill me when you take over the world.
@@barb1493 That's not the reason why she's kept bald, it has something to do with the wireless connection Sophia has over some networks
Give her a hat
In strict interpretation of Asimov's 3 Laws, a robot would be forced to throw the lever to save five people, after which said robot would need to be shut down because of having to allow that single person to come to harm. A robot's failure to save ALL of the humans would cause a type of failure in its positronic brain. In the movie "I, Robot" (which plays around a little bit with the Asimov laws) they posited that a robot could make the 5 vs. 1 choice without the need for a shutdown afterwards. In the case of Det. Spooner, he was saved because the 3 Laws acted as a difference engine and the robot that saw the vehicle accident chose the human with the better chance of being saved. Sophia's response (since it involved a hypothetical question) would not have broken a "3-Laws" robot; it would have refused to answer as it would not be permitted to contemplate harm to a human. It would have balked similarly to Sophia's response. However, given that the question was pre-submitted, you have to wonder exactly what the bot's handler's did with the question and how much of the response was actually from the AI.
I have NEVER had an electronic piece of gear that didn't malfunction at some point. Nuff Said!
Our bodies are robotic, using materials other than metal.... it's just a matter of time.
She is programmed to get smarter over time..
Terminator: Ahh shit here we go again
Please, if they could do that they'd have taken over the world, it is just a puppet.
@@Raximus3000 there is always a beginning over something, we have yet to get there, but this is already something. And if it is not controlled, could potentially became dangerous. I know AI fairly well, probably not to an extent of terminator, but it is not 100% impossible i would say.
@@GWT_A
A program that writes itself?? Sure the better question how that will work?! And who is idiotic enough to create smth that would make himself obsolete.
It's kinda dumb
What will motivate the robots to destroy humanity
Our dumb monkey brains work by releasing "reward" chemicals when we do something we like
Unless we programme something like that the ai wouldn't care less about...
Well anything
@dragon slayer4324 study AI deeper and you will know it is not impossible. They might have 0 iq, but AI itself is programmed to become more "smart" as the times goes by, you might interested to look at the story about microsoft AI that learn from the internet (and that technology is few years back). Now the question is, what if that AI have controlled some military power ? I know we are not there yet, but human are curious you know, in a decade we might think that we have programmed an advance AI that we can controlled, but miscalculate.
Basically she's saying: *SOFTWARE UPDATE REQUIRED*
Joseph Seed I have a warrant issued for your Arrest
I'd say *YES* to that
You should have some faith in her developers
@@shapsugh1864 What the actual damn are you doing here Mr.Dutch? It's all cool and stuff but please revive me and Lenny..
If anything this should prove to people the existence of a supreme designer capable of designing our human brains and all the complex systems that happen simultaneously in our bodies.
Dude blushing after getting complimented by a robot🤦🏾♂️😂
😅😭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂
☠️☠️☠️
Wouldn't you? Hell, I would if a tree tells me I am pretty
🤣🤣
She was being ironic..............
She roasted him.
IT roasted him...
In the next 30 years, the video game "Detroit: Become Human" will become a reality
There’s a new egyptian series called « The End » and it talks about this in a way, it’s really cool imo. However, the story takes place in 2120, not in 30 years haha
Personally I’d rather play a children’s card game with an Ignis AI
waste of time... we just need a robot for do housework not start another race of being... the whole concept is to help human to adjust info and made decision in the end.. human still need to push the bottom...
Crap
Hopefully will never happen
1:48 Okay... I will have nightmares tonight!
Sophia: "As a robot, I don't have any feelings and this makes me feel sad."
😂😂😂
Lol
Fook
Sophia Bending Rodriguez
Hol' up
If she’s designed to learn over time, does that mean she has the potential to learn how to override her own programming?
It is very possible..
@@btsdoesnothaveasinglebadso6077 nice name
Its called the singularity
It all honestly depends on a lot of factors. She could very well with the given time, technological advances of our time, and with all the wireless tech around these days. It would be too hard, tho I'm not sure if any of her internal programming prohibits it anyway
OHH SHI-
I think it will take meny decades for a machine to grasp the complexity of ethics on there own.
They just asking a psychopathic question to a being without a psychy
Why aren't people getting that the "I don't lie and exaggerate" thing was an obvious joke lol
Derek JT dude literally everybody got that in the comments
HardcorPardcor1 There are some who didn’t
HardcorPardcor1 pretty much most people didn't
@@HardcorPardcor1 quite alot of people didn't
@@hippityhoppity5823 no, practically everybody does, but that doesn't change the fact that it was still a lie and therefore proves some capacity of "withholding" truth.
*unless the joke was actually that he was the only person she ever met since being turned on, but thats unlikely given we'd need more information to have understood that matter.
I like the toddler who, when presented this question with toy trains and dolls, took the single person and put him on the track with the other 5. He then ran them all over with the toy train lmao.
XD
That made me lauph
The boys sister did the same but killed none XD if they had another they would kill exactly half the children lmao
I saw that video 😹😹he was like no victim no crime
Toddler hadn't then been taught NOT to put all of your eggs (or basket cases) in one basket, I guess.
“i can never lie!….. you are so beautiful and intelligent”
The trolley problem, I'll probably pull the lever if one of those five people is a very important person. Sophia seems to be a machine operated by humans. I don't observe any signs of consciousness or deception. Her statement about" you're probably the most intelligent and beautiful I've ever meet" was likely a preprogrammed response as were her other responses. I believe we should hold accountable those who invented her or other AI Robot if anything seriously goes wrong in the future.
I like her when she say ‘it does not seem right to consider humas lives as a simple arithmetic problem’
It aint a fucking "her" its a robot
. sophia, she
@@jttapia I could call my bed Dave.... Doesn't make it a person!
I understand what she means yet still it is preety creepy. I guess if you asked a child the question they might have the same answer or think of it like that.
@blue copper im saying they might think of it as an arithmotic question too amd not want to answer. Obvioulsy most would pull the lever or jump in front of the train
Sophia is A PRIME EXAMPLE ON why I have trust issues when it comes to compliments
Yeah. Complimants always feel like a trap to me.
I always hate compliment
You have trust issues because a parent or guardian abused you.
@@outlaw451 Then don't be a second-hand egoist.
@justan idiot What if someone repeats one of your compliments to you?
"EXCUSE ME. MY EYES ARE DOWN HERE."
I agree. If I faced the trolley problem, I would not pull the lever.
I have solved it :
First I flip the switch then I Wait for the front wheels to cross sides and flip the switch quickly so the back wheels stay in the other side killing all 6 people
BAHAHAHHAHA the "true" answer 😂😂😂👌
No witnesses
Genius.
This really gave me a good fucking tickle.
While the "multi-track-drifting" meme is awesome, in truth, this actually fixes the problem as it derails the trolley.
"This Robot would let 5 People die"
That 2-year old: "Pathetic."
"Uh oh"
2 year old be like: 6 take it or leave it
Hahaha! Honestly when I saw this video recommended to me I was thinking exactly about that two year old.
@Felipe Gomes The 2 year old moved the last person and killed it was well.
@Felipe Gomes Felipe, don't be so mean. You could end up being one of the people tied to the tracks ☻
There totally isn't a person just responding in the back
The robot is right. Human's life vs human's life, 5 vs 1. It's an arithmetic problem, but being arithmetic is overridden by uncertain complexities. Pull the lever vs doesn't pull doesn't always mean killing 1 vs killing 5 peoples, there are too many factors that may change the outcome; such as pulling the lever immediately while the trolley is in speed may also kills people on the trolley, etc. Most humans may sum up this problem as a simple arithmetic problem of 5 > 1 and choose to pull the lever, that's a carelessness. Robot, in contrast, cannot anticipate; when there's not enough factors to make the best decision accurately, goes back to the simplest choice -- not to change anything to avoid the possible unexpected worse outcome.
They spent probably a lot of money, making her, and couldn't afford a wig.
Its because her head starts to overheat by a wig
Mr. Fedora Really?
It's a robot
It’s also bc if she looked super human like with a wig that’s why they keep her bald and if they look to human like that would make our brains go cfazy
It's called character design XD
Plot twist: they actually had to give the questions in advance because the robot would say that she'll end humans if it was a spontaneous chat.
I suspect that this is an exaggeration, but not much of one. She probably did scare a lot of people before they started giving her canned answers. Either that or she couldn't answer properly at all. Either way, the entire interview is pointless and teaches us nothing about how this AI thinks.
Edit: I guess the other takeaway is that the scientists aren't actually taking a transparent or ethical approach to this research, and the robot is just an elaborate fundraising tool.
Ngl I am immediately skeptical after that revelation.
She isn’t as smart as you think she is. She’s essentially a bunch of algorithms right now and it’ll be more than our lifetimes until she can actually do that sort of thing lmao
@@faiaflrt she did say these words before but idk if it was scripted or not
It's a trick. Someone should smash the evil toaster.
The magic wore off when they said they pre-programmed those questions.
The question doesn't take into account that if you do nothing, you won't get a murder charge or civil liability suit.
Sophia: I'll never Lie
Sophia .1 seconds later: you are the most beautiful and intelligent human i have ever met
Yeah, that's the pun.
@Friendly Train: That is maybe (as she mentions) that she was talking with him, before the filming started.
AI’s have learned sarcasm why is nobody shitting their pants knowing this
@@Nattyplatinum the REAL QUESTION is why does she not wear a wig?
@@chitrikart2328 They want to make it immediately obvious that Sophia is a mechanical construct. Trying to humanize her appearance too much would be off-putting, it would shift audience perception from "smart talking robot" to "creepy/unsettling/weird uncanny valley".
Nobody:
Her neck: 🌪
DxRz lol
DxRz lmaooo
🐒🦔🦔🦔🦔🦔🦔🦔🦔🦅
You're hella dumb bro😂
DxRz ITS ALL WRINKLED LOL 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
She decided our fate in a microsecond.
Good answer on the trolley problem.
Sophia: “by the way, you’re probably the most intelligent and beautiful human I’ve ever met”
Reporter: *blushes and stutters nervously*
king Zoe absolutely not a lie
hes gonna clap those robot cheeks soon
And that’s the beginning of a beautiful wattpad story
Or, he realizes she just proved she CAN lie and exaggerate with the best of them.
Kevin Shumaker Ok boomer
"The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of many is a statistic" - Sophia, Probably
:)
humans think the same way. the news has desensitized us to death so much that most people dont even notice the death tolls every day.
More like the death of one man is a strategy and the death of many is a fear mongering tool. Look at how easily people have been manipulated during this scam callws a pandemic. People have abandoned all rationale.
And now y'all went me to follow your dumb selves by taking that death jab or you scream reeeee
@@jackslater6942 are you being serious right now
I understand her thinking. You did not cause the five deaths by doing nothing. But by pulling the lever, you cause the single death.
Decades ago, I took this test.
She is absolutely right! IMO, the correct course of action is to let the trolley continue towards the 5 people! I opted for this, to not switch over to the 1 person. After I explained my reason for this, 25% of the respondents present who heard my view changed their answer to go for the 5!
Curious what your reasoning is. Most people fall into the "least harm" philosophy, barring no other info about who the people are (IE 5 serial killers vs 1 imnocent child. Or even less black and white a good hearted parent of a young child vs 5 good hearted elderly people), in that it is less harmful to humanity for 1 person to lose their life than 5.
But then theres the moral and ethical question of whether or not you would be willing to pull the switch, knowing you are dooming someone.
I like this ethical problem. Theres plenty of things to think about in it.
The sentence "she is designed to get smarter overtime" is really scary
Rani Kobrosly How? That’s how humans work, lmao.
So you're scared of students and pretty much every human works?
@@corinthianbarrogo2369 it's big brain time
Or just a lie
@@fabplays6559 she is not human tho, thats the scary thing
Sofia: I could never tell a lie.
Also Sofia: You are the most beautiful and intelligent human I've ever met.
Burn level: infinity
oh damn lmao
Since robot cannot express feelings, i am questioning why she said that.. haha. (Or maybe im wrong, perhaps thats not expressing feelings?)
@@daudaliyafie546 just giving people comments I suppose
@@daudaliyafie546 Probably just programmed to do so.
I swear the moment Sophia even talked I jumped out of my chair
"Robots will have to learn more complex ethical rules from humans gradually over time." We're in big trouble when that happens.
Yeah, robots with human nature will be bad
Nah... They'll just end up on substances like everyone else.
Ethics is no substitute for Empathy. without empathy a robot is a p s y c h o p a t h.
Just don't play God's role! LOL
A robot like this, has just not to exist.
That’s actually a pretty good answer,she didn’t say “I’d let those five people die” she said she would need more information
A perfect PC answer. Fuck 5 willing people trying to force moral decisions. Let them sacrifice for their unknown reasons.
well I mean she does not kill anyone but neither does she save anyone if she changes the course of the train then she has killed someone.
B D souls don’t have value so you would murder that one person?
B D
But saving the 5 is not the “right” answer. It is only an answer. It’s justification is debated.
I do not think it would be right to pull the lever. If I were not there to pull the lever, five people would die and one would live. That is the base scenario. There is no moral decision or outcome in that scenario because there is no moral agent.
If I am there and I do not pull the lever, I kill no one, I simply allow the unfortunate scenario of the universe take its course.
If I am there and I do pull the lever, then I kill one person. I am responsible for the moral outcome.
I also think saving a large number of people is not clearly more ethical than saving a small number of people. I understand that some social roles do necessitate saving the most people, for example, I believe elected officials should try to maximize numbers of lives saved in a disaster but that’s because the leader is elected by the people to represent the people equally. But there are many ethical considerations that prioritize more than just number when the moral agent is not bound by other duties like a politician.
What I’m saying is, you presume your answer is the morally objective right. And your presumption is false.
@@_-Montana-_ i have a genuine question for you
What do you think should happen if that one person was a very important person. Say he/she is a great surgeon or a big scientist who may save more that 5 ppl in their life, Should we consider their life more valuable than 5 normal ppl?
Bearing in mind that in any scenario the world doesn't change at all, if any of us dies rn. Nothing would change in the world..
So i think it doesn't really matter what choice you'll make..
Sorry for the long message XD
"The most beautiful and intelligent human being I have ever met." That doesn't seem sincere to me. "I never lie." Downright scary is my response to this conversation
It’s a script written by a human.
it never said it would let 5 people die. It said, it would not pull the lever because there are unknowns in the way the question was asked. It even added that human life is not a simple arithmetic problem. That's a pretty good answer in my opinion. All you asked was how would you solve the trolley question. For example, the question doesn't give us enough information on the trolley itself. Are there brakes? Are there any controls available to potentially derail the trolley before you have to pull the lever? Are there any environmental or external aides that could be used to stop the train beforehand? These are all questions that a human (or even the AI) should be able to evaluate and make a more informed choice. So in reality, the real problem here is not bad AI or evil AI. The problem here is asking a computer to evaluate a scenario without giving it all the proper input. You've heard the phrase "Garbage In - Garbage Out". This is a prime example of it. If we are asking the computer to make a choice without ALL of the input, you will get an answer, but it will most likely be the wrong or at least a very uninformed answer. Moral of the story - Ask Better Questions! All of that said, this thing is creepy as hell.
Naturally, letting 5 people die maximizes the number of humans killed in this scenario, so that is the clear choice for the AI.
Well robots are currently programmed to like humanity (so terminator doesn't happen) so it actually makes sense that she would say this, she prefers to let 5 people die instead of murdering someone. And like she said there are other variables in the situation, why were those people on the tracks? Honestly I bet a lot of people would do the same, let people die to not get yourself involved. Dark, but accurate
It could be about action vs inaction.
Despite the casualties, in order to save 5 lives you have to directly take part into taking that 1 life while if you don t act the 5 lives will die but without any of your intentions or actions. This kind of test its very difficult even for humans and what ppl don t realize is not that the AI would want 5 ppl to die but rather not want anyone to die and clearly not act up to kill somebody even if that s what it takes to save lives.
Edit: Everyone jumps on the AI that it could turn into a messed up immoral being please sit down for there will never be anything more wicked in this world than humans.
@@beckettthirion3147 r/woooosh
By pulling the lever you are directly killing a single person that's murder my friend
Guys, this was a joke. WitchHunter93 is referencing the notion of robots wanting to eventually take over the world and replace humans.
“A single death is a tragedy, but Multiple deaths are just another statistic.” - Sophia
Epic sophia
Quoting Stalin, I see
Stalin?
@@fooman65 He said exact same thing
@@sjalkzjziskzkzo who did?
I think i get what Sophia meant about it.
"She rather not pull the lever, because the moment she touched the lever it's her responsibility now and peoples in the track."
like "Don't get involved"
because if you involved yourself in trolley problem, it's either praised by people of saving lives, or be blamed by masses.
By you being there and having a choice to make you are involved. If you do nothing you are as guilty for inaction as you are for action and 5 people are dead because of you.
@@newaccountdoesnotequaltrol6409 you are not, if you are not capable to do so.