Could Anti-gravity Really be Possible?
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2024
- brilliant.org/CuriousDroid
Anti-gravity is one of those controversial subjects that some say is more in the realm of science fiction than science fact with many physicists saying it's just not theoretically possible while others are busy trying to find theories that would allow it to be possible.
In this video, we look at some of the things that we thought were anti-gravity but turned out not to be and what could be our nearest discovery with the vailidation of Einstein's predictions of space and gravity warping.
This video is sponsored by Brilliant.org : brilliant.org/CuriousDroid
Presented by
Paul Shillito
Written & Researched
By Paul Shillito
Images and footage : NASA, ESA, ESO, Boeing, Cambridge University, Claude Poher, Filipe V S, B-Bro, Lab Rat, Edemuz, Tek Nome, UToledoPhysAstro, www.iaa.csic.es, U.S. NAVY SEAL AND SWCC SCOUT TEAM
Music from the CZcams library
Mind And Eye Journey by Emily A. Sprague
Nidra in the Sky with Ayler by Jesse Gallagher
Dreaming Blue by Sextile
Timelapsed Tides by Asher Fulero - Věda a technologie
"I have created an anti gravity device"
US: military:
"It's mine now, also it does not exist"
Of course, it doesn’t exist. Don’t You know, the gravity is created by mass?
YDDES Of course there is the missing piece of the puzzle of what it is in that mass that creates the gravity in the first place. Maybe there are a few that have cracked the code and got buried in the bureaucratic red tape or buried all together for "reasons of national security" or whatever other reasons they can dream up. Not unlike what you have done but can't shed any further light on I'll bet.
Don't get me wrong I am a skeptic when it comes to things like flat earth (because it's stupid low hanging fruit and easily debunked) but some things are not so easily explained away. There are precedents that are official yet not explained, but also aren't acknowledged by skeptics in any way shape or form.
I always challenge the skeptics to reply but they always decline, it doesn't seem right to me. I make this type of comment about once a week in much larger threads fyi, and still nothing.
@@YDDES
*CITATION NEEDED*
behemuth would you rather have a greedy business owner who ordered the assisination of his partner to gain so much money he controls the world
@@itachi_uchiha1538 Thats a pretty movie-esque hypotechical. It's almost like it is completely made up nonsense that never has and doubtfully ever will occur in human history.
Also, I would not trust the US military any more than i would trust the Chinese military.
So Ning Li: this is a way to make anti gravity
5 years later: nope, doesn't work
leaves University and starts company of the "thing that doesn't work".
Gets awarded grant from defense for the same "thing that doesn't work".
Nowhere to be seen afterwards...
Have you checked Area 51?
it may not work for anti-gravity.... but she clearly found another use for it. ;)
If it is storing energy, the DoD would be interested. It could be used as a non chemical battery, even if it has no effect on gravity at all. That potentially sidesteps the theoretical maximum we are running into with regards to chemical energy storage. A battery with 10x the storage of current batteries would permit aircraft with longer range and no infra red signature.
That is even before we consider the destructive uses of it. Conservation of energy means that the energy stored is dissipated rapidly if confinement is lost. Unlike a conventional battery with two chemicals separated by a barrier, this has spinning bits kept from crashing by cold and quantum mechanics. If it breaks, it goes bang. 10x current battery storage would make it double up as an explosive with more energy than anything currently available. The energy not being chemical also means we don't run into chemistry based temperature limits. Get it to 100x storage and most of the energy would be X-rays. That could potentially replace a fission device as the primary in a hydrogen bomb. There goes all the nuclear safeguards, as those rely on limiting fission primaries.
If they have demonstrated a way to pump energy into a system that doesn't have well understood theoretical limits, the DoD will put money into finding those limits. The cost of letting somebody else find something amazing first with regards to energy storage is way too high a risk.
Given the number of bullshit science "discoveries" your DoD has funded, I wouldn't be surprised to discover it doesn't work, period.
Also: when the military find a game changer, they use it. _Always._ The fact they didn't speaks volumes. It's a dead end, like all those other "secret projects" that led to nothing.
@@agsystems8220 I was going to rant about this underrated comment, then I saw it's posted 10 mins ago.
So yeah. This event doesn't prove the scientist found anti-gravity, but it proves she found something of great potential value. I'm sure we will find about it a couple of decades when it gets declassified and put into smarphones.
Actually enjoyed the relatively accurate explanation of current theories. Hate when people assume they are “proven” generally just because of mathematics.
Identifying areas of science:
If it is green and wiggles, it is Biology.
If it is smelly, it is Chemistry.
If it does not work, it is Physics.
If it is absolute and yet somehow exceedingly vague and fluffy, it is mathematics.
While the general public may make such assumptions (and those public assumptions are rarely based on math), physicists do not. Physicists never assume that a prevailing theory is the gospel or that it is set in stone. That is simply not how they think. At the same time however they also realize some of these theories can be extremely useful even before they are proven to be 100% correct. In fact theoretical physics is responsible for many technological breakthroughs which have in turn brought us many of our modern conveniences.
As for some lay people insisting that some theories have been proven to be completely correct when they have not, this can definitely be annoying at times. Still, this is not nearly as annoying as the people on the flip side of that coin. I’m referring of course to people who are so ignorant and pig headed that they will even deny that natural laws are proven facts. For example they might insist that perpetual motion - and thus energy from nothing - is possible when in fact it is not possible in this universe as such a thing would violate the laws of physics (laws, not theories). These people are not necessarily all completely unintelligent of course but rather the are just highly irrational and because of this their opinions are always based on what they need to believe rather than on the facts. These types also tend to be conspiracy theorists more often than not. In any case there is no point in trying to reason with them and trying to do so is just an exercise in futility.
@@SLOBeachboy finally someone who knows what he is talking about! kudos!
Thank you. Rare to find a presenter as good as you. Understand gravity before ever finding antigravity.
Thank you for treating this subject with the gravity it deserves.
Wow
I bet this comment will attract many likes in the futur
Get out.
Ha !
These are, indeed, weighty matters to consider. For some reason I find them quite attractive. I am however, at a loss as to why I keep falling for them.
NASA: Whatcha got there?
Dr Ning Li: A smoothie
DoD: *I've come for your pickle*
An infinite improbability drive!
$450,000
Walking in a park
Nasa- Never A Straight Answer
In the late 60s too early '70s my dad was studying electronics for the military they were using it to project variations in radar signals used at the time to protect B-52 bombers over Vietnam. He mentioned to me that there was a story about a device that could be attached to equipment to make it lighter and more easily moved. We hear a lot of stories and come in contact with many things throughout our lives.
The operative word is “story”. I heard lots of stories in the Army.
@@zz-nc5kx yes, I'm with you, but I find it amazing how many stories turn out to be true 10 years down the line.
@@derrillyager7946 Well, any story that implies the existence of anti gravity will not turn out to be true - ever.
@@zz-nc5kx if you would have asked anyone about atomic energy 500 year’s ago he would have called you crazy. We don’t know what can be done in 500 year’s from today. The possibilities are endless.
@@Lion_Hamza The possibilities may be endless but not anti gravity. It doesn’t exist and will never exist. Just like perpetual motion.
This is a well researched and good presentation. Thanks so much for posting it.
Was already solved with buttered toast taped to the back of a cat.
Purr-petual motion...
radwizard - By far the best comment. 😄👍
I do wonder, if the experiments on gravity in CERN are successful, will that mean a toast made of antimatter would actually land on the "right" side?
@@slyseal2091 It might do but only because it's that 'I can't believe it's not butter' inferior substitute.
If you add an additional openface sandwich and an open book then you have enough stators to make a perpetual rotational energy device
5:20
Sounds like she was figuring it out and her project went top secret..
and / or KIA
@@gamaximusaurelius8969 Why would she be killed?
@@gamaximusaurelius8969 KIA lol what? First of all in the military in assassinations we say 'liquidated' or 'dispatched', second if she was on to something they would recruit her and definitely not kill her.
@@rollog1248 Term fits the purpose. on other hand do you really think the gov going to hire everyone who comes up with an idea like that and gives a nice fat big pay check with a Porsche and villa on Malibu?? u must be naive mate. also, why hire if they already have the tech?? Can u prove the opposite?
Tech like that would totally ruin the known economy. They not gonna give a chance to leak information to foreign forces therefore she is highly likely a liability.thats why...
@@rollog1248 Firstly, it's concerning that the military has more than one word for assassination. Secondly, if they already had the technology, they wouldn't want or need somebody else coming up with it.
I'm calling it: the recently released videos of UFOs are top secret antigravity machines made by Ning Li for the Department of Defense.
but if the feds have admitted they’ve been documenting them since at least the 70’s, who knew about the tech 20 years before Ning Li?
Oh I bet the department of defense and Boeing DARPA but they're working on it
@@millhouse782 Superconductors have been around since the 1950s, do you think nobody bothered to see if they affected gravity untill a few years ago..... nay
same here dude
This is literally what Bob Lazar has been saying since the day he came out with his claims. That the craft that the government have use some kind of anti-gravity technology powered by element 115.
"I have discovered anti gravity!"
_Later_
"No, no I have not! Just... just forget about it"
That's a way to avoid accidents I guess.
You are like that "Dizzy" character. He discovered Anti-Gravity after falling out of a tree and breaking his leg. He has been "anti-gravity" ever since. Perhaps the men in black threw him off the tree?
Ning Li was last seen flying a Tic tac shaped UFO off the coast of San Diego.
Alabama Woman leads F-18s on “UFO chase”
She was also seen at a zoo in China, munching on bamboo .. Oh that was Ling-Ling! So sorry.
Let me guess...it tasted like mint?
Not this again.
@@thememoryhole9355 Racist morons everywhere..
Department of Defense: "Oh.. Whatcha got there."
Inventor: "I just invented this anti-gravity device."
....
**Inventor goes missing and stops posting publically**
Media (on command from DoD): "Too bad we can't verify these results."
Edit: haha, thanks for the likes and comments guys!
You don't have to be Einstein to figure that one out!
Typically when a scientist's research disappears from public journals and universities is either one, they gave up and there experiments are failures. Two, there funding gets cut and the research projects are cancelled. And finally, if they are successful and they get Dod approval, there research will go dark and become classified depending upon the invention and whether or not the military wants to reveal certain military technological advancements to the public. They usually reveal "new military technologies" at a time when they have developed a classified technology that makes the older one obsolete. When the media reports a story about DARPA developing some new technology, it's probably already 20 years old or more.
@@alphega1983 “There” means in that place: We drove there early in the morning. “Their” is a possessive form of they: They gave their earnings to charity. “They're” is a contraction of they+are: When Grandma and Grandpa get here, they're going to take us out to lunch.
@@alphega1983 Another angle on that though is that it is much easier to convince DARPA grant reviewers of things than domain experts like other scientists, so a lot of shady operators, when their research looks like it is about to collapse publicly, stop publishing and convincing the DoD to fund them. As long as you give them convincing powerpoint presentations every year or so and have a good personal relationship with someone in the department, you can fund a small lab for a LONG time and not produce any results.
People put WAY too much faith in the professionalism and planning of DARPA. It is mostly rotating fiefdoms, vague calls for research, and blocks of money given out to what sounds interesting to people unqualified to evaluate feasibility but who really like meetings and paperwork.
@@alphega1983 Or they get put into a bag that gets put into he ground, but hey, we never know.
Excellent presentation. This is very educational and deserves to be widely viewed.
Very good summary with clarifying explanations. Well done.
Anti Gravity: *Exists*
DoD: "Not anymore."
Star trek: exists
CBS: NOT ANY MORE.
@@JeanLucCaptain Damn right. I boycotted CBS so they'd know not to take Advantage of us loyal trek fans but I was sad to hear so many weak willed people gave in and forked over CBS's subscription fee just to watch 1 tv series in real time. They couldnt even wait a few years to see it free thru syndication. They may live long but with such weak wills, they clearly will not prosper. CBS U make Ferengis look honest!
The DOD are the main ones creating antigravity ships.(* cough the TR3B couch *) That's where all the "black money" is going to.
DoD has killed more promising technology than Google.
@@jayyyzeee6409 That's not really fair. Microsoft squashed MANY promising tech companies in their day. Even more than IBM + Apple combined.
Science: antigravity could open the gate to space exploration
Boeing: Let's steer enemy missiles
There is no gravity in space. There is tons of electricity and electromagnetism, however.
Roland Deschain That is actually false, as there are gravimetric forces in space. There is gravimetric forces everywhere, no matter how small, due to how gravity is defined in both newtonian physics and physics surrounding gravity by Einstein.
@@isorokudono wtf are you talking about? What do you think moves the planets?
Roland Deschain
Wait. What?
What is holding the entire universe in place?
How are we still alive?
@@isorokudono yep, I can see the earth sailing into open space now 🌎😂😉👍
Don't forget the earth is flat as well 🤣👏
Gotta give it to you, you have a great narrative voice
Yeap, the voice alone made me subscribe
They never had a problem with this on Star Trek.
Of course not, they had good story writers.
It sounds like any time we hear about scientists getting close to discovering a method of simulating anti-gravity both the project and scientist go dark and are never heard about again. Gee, I can only imagine why this is.
Odds are their projects failed and that was that.
Like an old girlfriend, you never see them again.
@@Saugaverse True, every year thousands of people "get close" to discovering a free energy device, only for the project and creator to go dark for the same reason. It failed! ;)
@@HPPalmtopTube No such thing as free energy, but yes a few drastically novel energy sources/harvesters are researched in secret I believe. We live in an amazing world, the truth is out there.
Like bionic arms but actually getting closer, also aerospike engine, succeded but never used since it isnt efficient because of the weight...
Also random, do yoi think quantum computers will really get close?
Jeffrey050711 alien abduction
1:Discovers possible anti-gravity options.
2: Puts 'new' research out saying there is no anti-gravity.
3: Opens her own company and calls it *AC Gravity LLC*
Nothing suspicious here at all.
And then disappeared forever!
@@Rafayel06 With $400k
And then NASA starts: stops it all. Then Boeing starts looking into it: shut down. Black project? No comment.
Not suspicious at all.
exactly, I know someone that disagrees with this baloney sandwish..Antigravity has been explored already...Einstein was wrong in many issues inc Spooky action at a distance, which is called Entanglement...too much baloney sandwich in physics taught in school..Antigravity in itself is one of many terms explored already..How about air cavity resonance instead? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov
Sounds like somebody got a job at Area 51.... (or wherever the really cool stuff actually is, if Area 51 is just the decoy site)
Speaking of sci fi travel. I wonder what a warp would look like? Would this space ship just disappear in thin air as it enters the fourth dimension? Or would it disappear in some direction? Or a portion of it disappearing before another part does? What would it visually look like if it could be seen at all?
Cool episode. BTW,where did you get that shirt? It's cool!
*has promising results*
"nevermind guess it was nothing"
*goes private, gets Defense money, goes quiet but still operational*
Sounds like it was something
no necessarily. the U.S. needs to research based off even the remote possibility of there being 'something' to ensure its national defence.
@@davemustaine7504 national defense from whom
@@Krystalmyth the offense.........
Funding by the US Govt is proof that this does not and will not work.
Paul’s shirt actually has anti-gravity capability.
Anty gravity is probably
the only way to create the
force needed to reach, a
unbelievable speed. Never
possible for many reasons.
There's a giant pile of questions that need answers
But clarity it's hiding within.
Cause it's repulsive?
@@alliedvera4960 exactly.
He legally has to wear the shirt due to legal reason. He is a noted illegal drag racer but he has no car yet races drag cars. Crazy I know but he runs at a top speed of 126mph with unrivaled acceleration if he did not have that shirt drivers wouldnt know it was really him and they would therefore jack him in the neck with a 2by4.
Good day all
I LOVE his shirt....maybe its a time-warp-portal-device
Brilliant explanation. Really cool video.
To say we know nothing about the universe is an understatement.
"I have created an anti gravity device"
*Homeland security would like to know your location*
They already know.
more like, H S get down and shut up, in the middle of the night after the power randomly cuts out
@@allenjenkins7947 : The interagency memo was circulated already.
Refer to NSA doc 20191108-0735DC3Gw463rAsz362178054447-aqc32
THEY KNOW YOUR LOCATION....THAT'S EASY
@@allenjenkins7947 Next: "They think they know. That's just a decoy. I have developed a teleportation device." XD
Back in the 80’s everything was more “heavy”
Except the youth
illusions77 why is that? Is there something wrong with the earths gravitational pull?
Except for the hair.
Back in the 80’s gravity had a different value other than 9.8ms, Thant made things less or more heavy. ESP during exam times :)
@illusions77 Nice Back to the Future reference/pun!
I love this guys work.
Superb video, thank you.
"[Rockets] are nothing more than a chemical reaction"
Rocket engineers: "Guess i'll just die"
Dark matter is a funding scam!!!
Nathan Toms correct
What about that released videos by the NAVY of UFO's? That looked like anti gravity to me.
The pilots seemed shocked in the video, at what they were seeing. These people are highly trained to identify other aircraft.
A complex reaction which involves fluid dynamics, pressure mediation and changes etc etc.
@@nathanieltoms7733 what makes you think that?
To quote James Brown “Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me”. He was onto something.
No. He was “on” something 😂
_"Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me"_ isn't accurate, which was one of the problems with Newtonian gravity. According to Newton, if the sun instantaneously winked out of existence, the Earth would immediately careen out of orbit. Both light an gravity are extremely fast... however, we know through observation and experiment that neither is instantaneous; both travel at 299,792,458 m/s.
Scott McLennan 🤣 ‘Brother is saying something here!’
Christopher Noel so you’re telling me James Brown was possibly on the wrong track with his theories?
But Bob Marley expanded on the concept....
"Every little Action... Deserves a Reaction."
Could you please post some links for open science articles? Also you did not mention em drive and "inercoids" made by Tolchin
You talk about the magnetic particle accelerating triple pressure system so the negative or the positive voltage fluctuation between the magnetic particle accelerator up on the high-pressure containment wall that we had and it was a glass containment wall with 3 different bio vacuum pressures and a high high pressures at that which window electrostatic finally gets through that wall it has to fight harder to get through so it takes an amplifies the wave creating a solid proton matter stream
"We don't know what gravity is..."
It's a heavy subject, man... :)
pun intended? yeah, must be weighty discussion
I see what you did there , I give your joke 9.81/10
That's deep.
@Beumadine Sweevy Nice copypasta m8
VERY!!
That story about 'Ning Li' and her research is scektch as hell
I remember reading about Ning Li afew years ago. She just disappeared and never heard of again. Crazy story!
I’ve never heard of her, but I had heard of Podkletnov. I didn’t realize their stories were so similar. Might have been onto something.
I wear sketcher sneakers. I hope they don't disappear me too.
looks like she pocketed the money. I mean if the government comes around and offers you a lot money for research that in the end will amount to nothing anyway, you'd still want the money lol
@@carlosandleon if only girl clothes had pockets. Most are just flaps for show or tiny pockets just large enough to fit a single square wrapped condom. You think we enjoy having to carry around our cute designer purses? You're right, we do! 😜
Of course. Just like electromagnet fields can be positive and negative we just need to figure out how to make a negative gravitation field.
Being able to alter space could allow some form of anti-gravity and this is done by removing the matter from space thus countering gravity and now it is only a matter of effecting space by placing object without weight or mass with being able change it weight and other ideals could involve warping , bending , folding or stretching space.
My physics teacher told us that mankind already have anti gravity power :
The more mass a person has, the less attractive they are.
It would seem on the face of it humans have had it in the past if the hindu sacred literature is anything to go by. And it seems that it is. As a concept it should be possible using very high end super conductors and super magnets. It would be necessary to produce power of a high amount in a very small limited space using a mercury ion generator of some kind as the sanskrit literature writes about this concept. Its a matter of harnessing negative and positive effects of magnetism.
That’s fucked up and it’s not even funny
Hahah okie dokie
LEELe hahaha okie dokie
@@destineyrodgers1733 YOU MUST BE A FATTY !!
In the summer of 1967, the Rice University Physics Dept. sent a backyard inventor to me at Shell Pipeline Corp. to evaluate his supposed antigravity device. The demo device was made largely of Plexiglas and powered by compressed air. The theory was that acceleration of the air stream would "induce" a static gravitational effect, visible by the motion of small balls. The embarrassing thing was, it seemed to work as advertised! A back-of-the-envelope calculation showed that any genuine effect along those lines should have not have been detectable. We hypothesized several causes for the observed effect. After some work in the machine shop and a couple of tries, we were able to track the effect down to leakage of turbulent flow within the air stream. Nice try, but no cigar.
Fantastic explanation.
Thanks for a great video! 👍🏻
The more I watch Curious Droid, *_the more I like it_*
I tried to listen to the video, but was mesmerized by his shirt.
That shirt right?if he wasn't smart we just laugh at him 😁😅
He does wear some wild ones, huh:)?
I think its fractal
I want it. Whhere could i get it, i wonder?
lol i didn't even realize his shirt till i read this comment had to go back to see what the u were talking about
Dear Mr. Shillito, You sir are very good at researching, writing and presenting. Thanks for the fun material.
would love to see an update to this video someday.
[Gravity]: What goes Up, must come Down . . .
[US National Debt]: *hold my beer* . . .
That cant go up forever either. Leads to a large collapse
@@goldengun9970 Bet
@@lordinquisitorjohn1357 yes john. You can just create $ forever as much as you like. Even though every other time in human history it has failed this time it won't. Of course
@@goldengun9970 *sigh* It's just a joke man.
@@lordinquisitorjohn1357 i wish it was
I’m a simple man. I see a new curious droid video, I click on it. In all seriousness, you’ve been an inspiration. I’ve been watching your videos for years at this point. As a scientist, I’ve always loved your content. And as now being part of the space program, your videos have a different weight and relevancy
Gravity explained here (this is not a joke): czcams.com/video/NTpytbccqgs/video.html Do you know this stuff in the space program?
@@scottmcrae7410 Lol
I believe there could be a way of countering the force of gravity using high velocity charged particles. In some places in the confinement the charge particles would travel near light speeds and at other points far less velocity. Because the higher velocity particles have more inertia than the particles traveling slower.
wouldn’t that just be a different form of propulsion?
Great content and presentation. 😊
Betteridge's law of headlies: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no"
Yep. On youtube, pretty much always.
Idk, I got a "maybe, we don't know yet" from this video.
Can any headline ending in a question mark be answered with a no?
Paradoxically, you've broken the 'law'.
For science topics, that law should be reformulated to "Possibly until we have information. But not now".
Thank you for getting right to it, no ads.
One of Mr. Droid's
Very best!
"Since 2001 she has effectively dissapeared"
*Tin foil hats begin to quiver*
lol....hhhmmmmm?
I mean, come on, you cant say thats not weird . figures out gravity then disappeared.
@@brandenjones716 I was saying WHAT !, because I didn't understand shit he was saying....lol, But the disappearance doesn't surprise me. She's maybe working on a new weapon to kill people right now. For the Gov. no less.
"Since 2001 she has effectively dissapeared" .... suspicious....or a terminal case of "What the hell was I drinking?"
@@dumptrump3788 MAYBE BOTH
Best video on "antigravity". No BS just the science. Thank you.
Very interesting. And so refreshing to watch a video that wasn't claiming some bogus perpetual motion machine.
If gravity really is just the difference in "graviton pressure" by blocking graviton with mass in one direction, then we would need a way to redirect this graviton with energy which does not carry gravity, before they hit the object we want to influence.
So we need to block the "up" or generate our own gravitons in the direction of the "down".
Since we found gravity waves and neutrinos I am confident that it is possible, but only with more base research in field manipulation and energy transformation.
Earth: pulls u in
*pulls out reverse card*
You:pull earth in
Nothing pulls you, the earth does not pull, gravity does not exist, it is the subatomic particle AETHER that pushes you towards the magnetism of the earth. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Love the video's, wish they came out more often but keep up the great work ma man
Rather quality over quantity.
Video on You tube shut down after 2 months. Peltier module on digital
weigh scales loses weight when powered. John Keely did this type of work
in his shop approx 1892 Philadelphia . He used themocouples /
thermopiles wires of gold, silver + platinum. With array of tuning forks
resonance vibrations applied to mass with wires, and nodes
multiplications, with harmonic ratios, heavy metal would rise up. He
also demonstrated triple sirens flywheels/ floating with resonance
vibrations and ratios. He would speed up rpm with air pressure on side
cups, then slow 2, for sound frequency's ratio. This was also done with
French scientist using large sandwich plates of differing metals at
each end of open dirigible frame, that lifted in air when oscillator
frequencies applied. It was said that Keely got the earth frequency from
Tesla. Tesla didn't like Keely , since Keely got more investor's money
than he did.
*One needs to define gravity first: Gravity is simply the electrons in elements ALL traveling in an elliptical orbit. If you get enough mass together the elliptical orbit of of many septillion electrons crates gravity. On the surface of a black hole (A sphere of tightly packed neutrons) massive amounts of electrons crowd on the surface unable to pass into the tightly packed neutron mass. The elliptical orbit of these electrons could be measured in centimeters or or even meters and create massive gravity. Why is an elliptical neutron producing an invisible force? It's not the elliptical orbit but the differential in speed. The electron moves very slowly away from the element and on the flight back down to the element speeds up immensely. This acceleration towards the element creates the gravitational field. To control gravity one simply needs to control the flight of electrons and their shape and their orbit which is not so simple. If we ever do create anti-gravity it will take as much power in electricity as a rocket engine expels in chemical energy. That law can never be broken. It takes raw energy to defy gravity and in the future we will discover a device that will utilize these large amounts of energy necessary to power it.*
Anti-gravity?? Actually, I’m PRO-gravity. Helps keep me from floating away.
Ok boomer (;
@@syaondri Use a balloon. Duh.
Gravity kills!!!
syaondri, if you plan on floating away, make sure you have oxygen handy for your trip
Nabre Labre, that depends.. gravity on Earth saves lives. Gravity in a black hole ends lives.
If some kind of anti-gravity device or engine were discovered, you can bet on it that we'd be the very last to know - if it all.
The government has had it for years. Just because msnbc hasn't told us about it, doesnt mean it doesn't exist.
Uh.....so you think people wouldn't be climbing over themselves to make a fortune on such a discovery? Yea, that's likely....
@Agent J Right. Why do I let myself get sucked into these things ha ha ha
@1234 Can you tell me what causes the Tajmar effect in rotating near-superconducting metals? Do you think it is a symptom of the Casimir effect, composite bosons interacting with gravitomagnetic fields, complex gyroscopic procession and vibrational error, or interactions with the recently confirmed Higgs?
When you push a Megajoule per microsecond through superconducting discs, what particle exactly allows some of that energy to travel through blocks of lead, if at all? (You can find a video on this one)
If we can ignore the UFO-Mania campaigns, and think rationally for ourselves, we could certainly get a lot of individuals studying these materials. We need a lot more yes or no answers than what we have, then we can drill down on why. There are many researchers that have been working on this for over 2 or 3 decades now, some with more or less success and attention to detail. One that seemed to believe what he said on television shows was Eugene Podkletnov, but his dishonesty or irrationality got him expelled from his institution. It appears that he was trying to explain flux pinning or induced diamagnetism in place of gravitational shielding, but the jury of peers is still out, and his 1997 comments are still a mystery.
6Beers&1Waitress The Germans were experimenting with it since the 1930s. The TR-3B is the first known anti gravity vehicle the US has developed. Today we have the Black Manta. Take a look at Bob Lazar on CZcams. The Black Manta is discussed in detail by industrialsurrealism.com. "What's in our skies."
Could it be possible that if you displace enough space like say with something object the size of a planet ..that form of energy becomes a reality and holds everything down sort of like a magnet holds metal?
After listening to this you wonder if the idea of gravity as a thing in itself is just an illusion and the effects of “gravity” are due to something we don’t understand about the other known forces.
Something about this video just 'pulled me in' when I saw it pop up in my subscriptions box.
RPKVids I must admit, it is a very attractive topic.
need to get some of that element 115.....
well, it's called Moscovium, and it was finally synthesized in 2003 and it has none of the properties lazar claimed back in the 1980's.
It's also completely useless as it decays less than a second after it's created, so you can't store / keep it.
Just like the 2012 end of the world prediction, lazar's claims are all made up fantasy which has given him a massive, free advertising campaign for his business called "United Nuclear"...
How do you know of this???? Keep your mouth shut!!!
@@ShanerTheGrey ehh ???
@@HPPalmtopTube ya lazar is a liar no doubt but it was a funny comment.
@@HPPalmtopTube That because the element 115 that was found on the craft was stabilized. Current element 115 the we hold isn' stabilized.
I’ve always wondered if the part of e=Mc^2 that relates mass to energy is some form of vortex that causes the space time contraction that we describe as gravity?
Gravity is not a force, it is the curving effect that all mass has on space.
Unless you could controllably curve space in a small area, antigravity is impossible.
@@MichaelClark-uw7ex Antigravity is definitely possible and does exist. Bob Lazar has given very detailed recollections of his time at area 51, he said these UFO crafts at area 51 were powered by element 115 long before element 115 was discovered, he mentioned how these crafts generate gravitational waves decades before gravitational waves were discovered, he even gave a detailed explanation of how some of these UFO's maneuver, and in declassified UFO footage these UFO's move exactly as Bob described. Moving in ways that would only be possible with antigravity propulsion.
Unfortunately from what he said, we are too technologically behind to effectively reverse engineer the technology on these alien crafts. This is a craft that had no electronic components, no wiring, no moving parts, no on or off switch, generated no heat, but had the ability to distort gravity around it.
This is a fascinating subject and what is not so surprising is that the work seems to have gone underground.
It will take the birth of another Einstein type of genius to find an answer to what gravity actually is.
Imaging the possibilities.
Gravity has somthing to do with vodka.. After 2 shots i feel like gravity is increased by 2 times
Just 2 shots? Get your liver tested buddy
@David Daivdson oh in that case register for a transplant 1st and then get it tested
weakness disgusts me
after 3 shots gravity disappears alltogether
You should try taking two shots from the law, the gravity of the force is over powered
Best video on Gravity and recent events and research I’ve seen!
Una de las mejores exposiciones sobre el tema.
what if gravity is an interaction between antimatter and matter at a quantum level. The space/time fabric is made of anti-matter, when objects with huge masses produce frame-dragging, they're interacting with anti-matter, the interaction produces gravity. so all we need is to find an element that is heavy enough on its own to frame drag and interact with antimatter in order to produce gravity, therefore counteract earth gravity
at 0:15 the question is, "Could an apple that falls onto a table and splits into 4 equally sized pieces with surfaces sliced perfectly flat Really Be Possible?"
When a scientist working for DoD quietly "disappears", it means they discovered something very useful.
billyman ; there is a high possibility of that.
Or that they discovered something that could be useful but the DoD doesn't want to take the risk of further research being seen by the public.
@@illusions77 Yep, it could be anything, not necessarily antigravity. How many discoveries are accidental?
You have nailed it my friend.
Usually it just means the researcher pocketed most of the cash after he or she came to the conclusion their idea failed.
...It is well known in physics courses that the vector force of angular momentum overcomes or offsets gravity. Thus you see those effects in the gyroscope or rotating wheels.
As I was watching this, an idea occurred to me. Most of the existing antigravity concepts involve some form of mechanical rotation, or electromagnetism, or both, to create an antigravity effect. But what if.....what if the problem is thinking in terms of ANTIgravity? Could we instead think in terms of creating a gravitational field around the air/space craft itself, but a controllable field, one that could be directed so that it could be offset from the vehicle's center of gravity, thus causing it to literally fall towards equilibrium in any direction the operators wish? The potential here is that anyone inside the craft would not feel any G force whatsoever, no matter what kind of insane maneuvers the craft performs. Essentially, using directed gravitational beaming, the craft and its occupants would exist within their own gravitational bubble. This would also have the effect of slowing down time within the craft, relative to the external universe.
If this could actually be done, what we'd have would essentially be a form of warp drive. It would require a lot of power to produce a gravitational field strong enough to achieve truly spectacular performance, but it would also be highly efficient. No rockets, no jets, no huge fuel load to burned and hurled out the Craft's rear. The power source would almost certainly have to be nuclear, since that is the best way we know to get massive power from a relatively small amount of fuel that lasts a very long time.
Right. So how do we produce this self contained gravitational bubble?
I keep thinking about gravitational lensing, the phenomenon in which the gravitational field around large bodies like stars actually bends light. Einstein's principle of universal covariance says that everything has an effect on everything else, and Newton agrees, "for every action, an equal and opposite reaction."
So. Gravitation bends light. Can light bend gravitation? Meaning, is it possible to warp spacetime with light?
Not just any light, this would require extreme LIGHT DENSITY using the very upper limit possible in lasers. The idea is, even the light from the sun, intense as it is, is not coherent nor is it highly concentrated in a small space. It is spread out, so its effect on spacetime (hence gravitation) is very minute. This is rather like the gravitational interaction between a planet and a 170 pound astronaut on a spacewalk gone bad. Earth's gravitational field is pulling at the astronaut, but the astronaut is also pulling at the earth. The huge mass difference means the earth wins, and the astronaut plummets to his doom.
But. The Earth moves too. Just a TINY bit, maybe no more than the breadth of a quark.
Photons are massless, though, so how could they warp spacetime to create gravity?
See, I literally am thinking this through as I write, so I'm none too sure that this idea is going anywhere but down the toilet with all the other waste material. Even so, I keep going back to universal covariance. Everything in the universe affects everything else. Change value A, then value B is also altered. So is value X. And value J. So if we have super high powered laser light, generated by nuclear fusion & packed into a small a space as possible, going around rings which encircle our hypothetical air/space craft, with no gaps whatsoever between the rings which cover the entire craft, would the sheer light intensity at maximum density affect spacetime?
I think...I THINK🤣 that it might, because spacetime affects light. And, if we take the view that all particles are actually distortions or twists in a fundamental spacetime field, then it surely would.
So yeah. I just gave myself about 20 years of work to do🤣😹
Dude ... magnets !
The Earth has a magnetic force and what happens when two magnets are pushed together at the negative or positive ends ?
They repel each other. Is there a machine or way to increase the magnetic force in am object ?
So in theory a craft could defy gravity and if you could increase turn up the strength of the magnet you could use it to travel in a certain direction !
Work smarter, not harder.
Also, you want to verify the information you base your theory on .
They say that we are on a spinning ball in space which is not accurate.
That’s actually interesting… please message more if you figure something out that’s interesting.
Nice rant, but you're talking as if we can create a gravitational force, we can't.
@@wardaddy9910 Magnets aren't gravity. The Earth's magnetic field is WEAK.
Your whole hypothesis is relying on the Dunning Kruger Effect...
@@edwardfletcher7790
We currently can't. There was a time when we couldn't create an electromagnetic field or a nuclear reactor either, but that did not stop us from trying until we finally succeeded. There is ongoing research into gravitational propulsion by NASA and the US military. The US Navy, after the Tic Tac event became known worldwide, admitted that UAP's are real physical objects that appear to fly using technology that manipulates gravity and inertia. Science has a history of claiming that things are impossible and then uncovering new data that proves the 'impossible.'
I think it likely (if we do not allow our 'leaders' to 'lead' us into oblivion) that we will develop gravitational warp drive sometime within the next 50 years.
10:08 there was some experiments (about a year ago I think) that measured gravity on the atomic scale, and concluded it had the same effect no matter how small. It made headline news here at the time.
beautiful documentary, nicely explained for everyone who has some interest in science
Gumnam Musafir. Still No anti gravity…
So, nice video. Time for an update!
Interesting as well as the comments. Doesn't seem like anyone wants to tackle gravity. Sometimes if we move our frame of reference, clarity will be welcomed. Thanks for the vid.
Could we have a complete series on “gravity” ? Your videos are awesome! Lol
Yes, amazing. Thank you so much for your review on anti-gravity possibilities, this is what i wanted, not just videos on "simulating gravity with centrifugal force".
So, is it possible to bend space-time with means other than a gravitational field?
Several years ago, a video was shut down after 1 month. It was dealing with demonstration of thermocouple/thermopile that slightly loses weight when activated, and also on sensitive digital weigh scale. The word "correlation" describes other experimenters who successfully aborted gravity with their specialized set ups using matched metals according to ratios of properties. See 1800's work of John Keely with his "transmitters" as junctions of silver, gold, and platinum thermocouples as tested for gravity control. A french scientist also lifted an open frame dirigible with sandwich plates at either end hooked to frequency transmitter. (translated from french) It seems there are other ways to disrupt gravity waves affecting mass..
I love your shirt bro! best shirt ive seen in years. Also you make amazing videos and could listen to you all night. Great stuff. Thank you.
I Love the way he explained everything in a calm and concise way
I had a theory about combining gravitons that’s how black holes work could be why neutrinos come from sag A in vast quantities but she could have been a great motivator they always go to someone else. Could have been a valuable asset to communication in neutrinos or anti grav acceleration later down the road but you had to waste the opportunity to let someone else enjoy her
When super cooled liquid helium climbs up out of a container, could that be a form of display of anti-gravity properties? Or something similar to it?
3:00 Now the TR-3Bs Black Triangles being charged by lightning might make sense.
I was wondering about the TR3B astra & was just about to comment. Do you have any vid links on it or literature links that you can point me to? My neighbor used to drive truck & make deliveries to several aerospace companies as well as experimental air force bases located near the everglades & near Kennedy space center (NASA). He claims he's seen the tr3b twice & gave me very vivid descriptions of it.
@@RichardCranium321 Nearly a year ago myself and a friend had one fly low overhead of us in Eastern Montana. It was completely silent and much bigger than I would have imagined. Where we were it was on course for Malmstrom airforce base which was about 75 miles by air.
@@justme-ij2qy Nice! I saw a black triangle 15 years ago, along with a couple other round looking lights. I've been trying to get footage of them! Figured 3 in 1 spot there's a reason they're there.... I saw an odd red flashing light there a few weeks ago.
My goal is to record one of those things flying directly over my head, or record one accelerate at impossible speeds :)
With the amount of sightings and phones with a camera.... we need more footage!!
@@justme-ij2qy one here was down a remote stretch of alligator alley & yes, it flew silent but moreover, it was moving slowly from east to west & then without spinning & no delay it immediately reversed course & was going back west to east in the same orientation + it didnt make a sound the whole time. What about lights, could you see any clearly to count? I've become very interested in this & I've seen footage of middle East where grunt level soldiers have captured it on film using what looked like some kind of light based particle weaponry to just level entire compounds in milliseconds
@@RichardCranium321 When I first noticed it, it was way off in the distance and the only way that I could tell that something was coming was because stars would disappear and then reappear in a pattern coming towards me. When it got close I could faintly see orange glowing circles underneath it, basically the color of dim red hot metal and when it passed overhead I could clearly make out it's triangular shape. The glowing areas struck me as openings, almost like a type of exhaust or a way of directing thrust/energy. There were no lights on it though.
Frame dragging; the reason galaxies spin faster than they should.
Possible. The rotating or moving body becomes "heavy", which is resolved by STR within relativistic masses. However, if the body is unsymmetrical (quadrupole moment), it loses energy through gravitational waves. Therefore, something that creates a compact feature is being considered and dark matter is the best candidate (for now). However, it is certainly a good idea to take into account your remark, ie the mass and space in the mixer, which induces additional gravity from the deformation of entrainment of space-time.
And also dark matter which keeps the galaxy together. Galexies spins too fast for the amount of gravity the galaxy creates meaning all the stars should 'fling' out of the galaxy like kids getting flung off a merry go round if an adult spins it fast enough. They can calculate the mass of a galaxy and the speed at which it rotates. This is how dark matter was discovered.
@@nvstewart Sure, but it's good to consider other mechanisms that emerge as an alternative to dark matter. It is a spiral structure of the arms, which adheres to its own gravity and equally to the central body. Then it's secondary gravity, etc. It's still under investigation.
The department of the Navy patented an antigravity device in the 1960s. It was just declassified in 2017 I think.
Can magnett work in any sense of the case?
this dude has amazing content, his research is so good, everything he has said in this video makes me feel so much like their are some conspiracy's going on
Anon (So I'll call you, 🤔Hmm... Greg) is that your Phone Number after the 4 characters of text? If so why and perhaps you may wish to change it.
I'm distracted by the style of this man constantly.
I'm distracted by his shirt
Dont you dare to mess with his awesome shirts! Just awesome...
A damn race of Traitors is out there paying artists like this to advertise what doesn't exist, it's a way of distraction for the Humanity. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Not only is it possible, but it’s a fact that someone has the ability to overcome gravity. And I swear by my behind that is a true statement!!
I am so confused by the discord on this topic. Brian Greene said that repulsive gravity IS included in general relativity, like when a region of space experiences uniform negative pressure, a cosmological constant/dark energy, inflation etc?
Does my mother-in-law count?
Because when she leaves after holidays I no longer feel pinned to the ground with a rhino sitting on me.
Hahahaha... Classic.
diGritz1 same here....
My entire family acts as multiple graviton beams, forcing me to drive to their house, have dinner, and sit and watch my teenage nephew open three dozen Christmas presents. The only way I've found to break the forces is to start talking about politics.
Test pilot in a broomstick factory by any chance?
Xanax = anti gravity (mother in law variant 🤣)