The Controversial Collapse of Chelsea
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 09. 2023
- ⚽The Best Football Wall Art To Decorate Your Room!
Use Code: 'CHELSEA' For 15% Off For 48 Hours: mezzaladesigns.co.uk
For Business Enquires and Promotions Contact Below
vizeh@ingoodkompany.co.uk
Follow Vizeh:
Twitch: / vizeh
Twitter: / officialvizeh
Instagram: / officialvizeh
Facebook: / officialvizeh
The Controversial Collapse of Chelsea
The Controversial Collapse of Chelsea
The Controversial Collapse of Chelsea - Hry
Vizeh releasing this video just after Chelsea lost to Aston Villa is the most Vizeh thing ever!
No me doing a video saying Man Utd are BACK 10 minutes after losing 7-0 to Liverpool is the most Vizeh thing ever
Nah bro Sheffield United just lost to Newcastle eight nil
@@Vizeh you should make a side channel called heziv lol
Hehe the odds were in his favor
No way did vizeh just give 15 percent off and chelsea are sitting a point above 15th haha
I think we can all agree that sacking Thomas Tuchel was Chelsea's biggest mistake. This was a manager who after 4 months into the Chelsea job, he immediately got them top 4, a FA Cup final and the biggest highlight was winning the champions league and beat the likes of Real Madrid and Manchester City in both the semifinals and final respectively. They also won 2 more trophies as well, and the next season Chelsea finished 3rd in the premier league, got to 2 more domestic cup finals unfortunately in both of them lost to Liverpool on penalty shootouts and in the champions league quarterfinals, they almost pulled off a comeback against Real Madrid in the second leg, a side who ended up winning the champions league in the end, and ok he lost the dressing room, and some of the players weren't happy with his tactics, but still Chelsea despite not being convincing and not playing attracting football that pleased the fans, they looked very good under Thomas Tuchel, yet the start of last season, you fired him which was beyond me. It's not only sacking him, but then hiring a manager like Graham Potter was their only choice and he was out of his depth, should've never been hired as Chelsea manager and he wasn't helped by the injuries, out of form players, or the big squad that was assembled and the results got worse and worse hence why they sacked him and couldn't give him the patience that was required, and once their season was over they reappointed Frank Lampard who was fired as Chelsea boss in his first stint, Everton almost got relegated and they also got rid of him as well, he's worse than Potter, and Mauricio Pochettino to be honest, isn't an elite coach and it shouldn't be a surprise that the team even after their summer rebuild where they cleared out the squad yet still spent 300+ million can't get results as their recklessness have left them with such a vulnerable squad and too many injured players in the team.
Apparently tuchel was only sacked because he and Boehly were on bad terms
Great comment mate!
I aint reading allat (maybe i will)
Poch aint elite? How can you explain THAT champions league run by spurs?
TT is also the manager who sold every striker possible
You can't expect to sell all the backbone of your team and get results, at least in the short term. The remaining players with seniority were sold (Kepa, Havertz, Mount, Kovacic, Azpilicueta)
Only 3 UCL winners from 2021, one about to retire (Silva) and another injured 5 months every season (James).
This is not a team, it's 30 strangers sharing a dressing room
100%
Going absolutely mental with both buying and selling players in the way Chelsea have been doing is just so unsustainable. The two reasons why Man United were so successful under Ferguson was because they'd refresh the team every season to keep the squad from aging too much and they went for the right sort of players. That helps maintain chemistry within the squad and the style of football the manager wants to play. Going out and buying essentially two whole squads of nothing but kids/young adults and immediately putting them on ludicrous contracts is literally begging for disaster.
They should have made signings more gradually and signed 2 or 3 per window to give the squad chance to gel together
@@Vizeh Chelsea signed 12 players this summer, some of whom have been sent out on loan. In the summer of 2003 when Abramovich arrived Chelsea signed 13 players that summer. They signed more in the following January & then even more in the next summer. And none of those signings were sent out on loan.
What's more, the previous season Chelsea had finished 4th in the Prem & were in the CL.
Whereas the previous season to this summer's addition of 12 new players, Chelsea finished 12th in the Prem & will not have CL this season.
Therefore you COULD argue there was more reason & more justification for the current owners overhauling the squad than there was for Abramovich to do so.
@@theredguy8746 There has been no suggestion & no indication that the owners of Chelsea want to or plan to sustain player turnover in the way we've seen in their first year.
Putting them on ludicrous contracts? Not at all, in fact on the contrary. The new owners at Chelsea have reduced the club's annual wage bill from £226m to £128m. That's a £100m reduction in just one year.
There are now only two players earning over £200k per week & only one player earning over £300k per week.
They're anything but ludicrous contracts, they are now putting players on much more sensible contracts.
Tuchel was the best thing to happen for Chelsea. Won them the Champions League, Super Cup and Club World Cup. Aswell as losing the final of Carabao Cup and Fa Cup to Liverpool on penalties.
I do wonder how'd they'd do with Tuchel now if he stayed
At least he not only got to those finals, but kept a clean sheet in both games minus the shootouts despite losing them. Both finals ended up being 0-0 draws going to penalties
Like sure they had lost to an eventually relegated Leeds and Southampton before Tuchel was sacked but the previous game was a competitive draw with spurs, and Tuchel was forced to have a greater hand in transfers with the departure of Petr Cech and Granovskaia it was lunacy
I’ll never forgive Tuchel and Kai Havertz for that Club World Cup personally 🤣
@@Vizehprobably 3rd and getting to the semis, where they win against Madrid, signing some quality players
Everyone seems to be missing the point that most of this downfall started when Abramovich was forced to sell. Clearly the problem lies there. Him and his team (his scouts, etc) were top tier.
Got rid of Thomas way before the happened
And the irony of it?
President Putin and Abramovich were never friends. Quite the opposite.
You’re not wrong that it’s a factor, kind of crazy to think that a war has led to the demise to Chelsea in a way
@@Vizeh Yeah. Chelsea used to do better business under him, too. Occasionally they would blow money on useless players (i.e. Morata) but not nearly as much as under Boehly.
i also believe that they're nuying mudryk is because they had to keep it cool with ukraine because of their history with abramovich and russian money
Regardless of Chelsea's unbelievable woes, you've got to applaud them for the way they finessed Arsenal with the Kai Havertz transfer.
That's fair
Scammed them lol
Yet still spend 100 million for a caicedo
@@easto1633*115 million
Havertz is contributing more than Mudryk
The maddest thing about chelsea is that the defence and midfield is actually not that bad but what always let’s them down is the attackers you never know where the next goal is gonna come from
I did a tweet last month saying no one in there team will get 10 Prem Goals this year and got lit up, i'm going to be right
@@Vizeh Ik this is a joke but naah they arent getting anything more than 40
Nah because it’ll be a Reece James hat trick from the hospital bed
@@Vizeh I have faith in Nkuku the guy looks clinical and that is what the other players lack, its not chance creation.
Not very good either. They have spent so much on midfield but don't have a half decent creator.
"The story at Chelsea is to rebuild the rebuild because the other rebuild wasn't good enough, and this is rebuild fc".
_ Vizeh.
Quality quote
“Buying ‘trendy’ players and just hoping for the best” is the best description of Chelsea’s transfer windows.
The 2 biggest problems I see with Chelsea, is they've bought and sold too many (again) you buy more than 2 or 3 + maybe a GK and it kills a teams chemistry, also they haven't bought any older leaders (they need more than Thiago Silva)
100%
i think clear lakes theoretical strategy was akin to that of a startups “move fast, break things” - unfortunately it has backfired beyond their understanding
@@Adrian-bx4ue i think you might be right, I mean it's clear that Boehly has a good business brain, but he came into this role knowing nothing about football, the strategy has been a disaster from the beginning, I recently told a few Chelsea fans "enjoy mid table" I have a feeling that'll be the new normal for a while
Fifa ultimate player viewpoint lol.
The actual reality is they don't have a clear playing philosophy.
Get a formation and buy players from clubs who play it ie sassuolo barca ajax etc etc
@@Micfri300 imo the problem isn't leadership or formation rn. With this team we should be able to beat the game we have been playing. The problem is that we can't score. The midfield and defense is solid and it's now getting thrown under the bus cuz we can't score
The lack of planning they showed during transfer windows is mind boggling. I am convinced that some of these players were bought just because some other team showed interest in them.
Remember saying this and got absolutely pelters for it too😂
Which players ? I’m
Sure most Chelsea fans wanted them all since last season
@@Sjtoolsie I get that feeling mainly from caicedo and mudryk due to how they entered negotiations in the last minute.
It wouldn't be their first time. I remember back in 2013 mourinho said that he bought demba ba because he simply did not want arsenal buying him.
@@hbfb1123 Chelsea had been working on the Caicedo transfer since the early summer. And they had been interested in Lavia ever since Southampton declined their £50m bid for him the previous summer.
@@hbfb1123you really know nothing, how to was Caicedo a last minute signing? We've been trying to sign him all year
I'm not a Chelsea fan, but that 2021 Champions League run was special- and all the parts fit perfectly in place. And I think the start of the real collapse was Abramovich being forced to sell the club. And I mean on every level- suddenly sacking the manager, probably changing scouts and directors and medical staff that have been there for years, and it was very easy to see it took toll on the players too. Players who suddenly lost interest, I mean who wouldn't after changing managers 3 times in 9 months, players who weren't injury-prone facing injury, and the atmosphere and football identity was lost after Abramovich sold the club and they sacked Tuchel.
I'm sure everyone has heard that "football heritage" speech by Jose Mourinho, but again- that CL run had players who were investments from the past. Academy players like Reece James, Mason Mount, Callum Hudson Odoi, Billy Gilmour, and veterans like Rudiger, Kante, Azpi, and it's insane that now, only 2 years later only 3 players even remain from that squad. Even players who I thought would've NEVER left Chelsea, suddenly packed up and left.
It's honestly sad to see.
The Chelsea way is complete chaos 100%
It is almost as if the players are protesting something, I wonder what
But once again this is another inaccurate account of what actually happened. The timeline proves it.
The new owners didn't make a load of changes BEFORE the season started. Chelsea's poor season was already underway BEFORE many of the changes happened.
Tuchel wasn't sacked because of anything to do with poor results or the poor start to the season. He was sacked because the manager & the owners couldn't come to an agreement on what the owners wanted the manager's role to be as the club went forward.
It wasn't really a sacking as such, it was a mutual parting of the ways. But technically it was a sacking & this was because doing in this way was financially beneficial for Tuchel (& much less problematic for the club).
The overhauling of the medical dept & various other areas of the club also didn't happen until well after the season had started.
Prior to the start of the 2022/23 season the new owners had only signed 5 new players for the first team plus a 6th player on loan. They literally had no choice but to sign these players. It wasn't Todd Boehly's fault that Rudiger & Christensen had both chosen to decline a new contract & instead run their existing contract down to become free transfers. Rudiger wanted to go to Real Madrid & Christensen wanted to go to Barcelona.
Alonso wanted to leave because Barcelona wanted him & Emerson wanted to leave because he rarely got any game time at Chelsea.
The Lukaku signing had been a total disaster (nothing to do with the new owners) & all parties wanted him out of the club. Timo Werner was wanted back by RB Leipzig & it wasn't a surprise to anybody that he left Chelsea.
And the things I've laid out above is the extent of the goings-on in the summer before Chelsea's poor 2022/23 season.
What is there out of all the events I've mentioned that came about as a result of anything Boehly or the owners did?
It sounds as if you're blaming Boehly & the owners for doing something wrong in regard to Reece James, Mount, Hudson-Odoi, Gilmour, Rudiger, Kante, Azpi. What is it exactly that the new owners did or didn't do in regard to any of the players you've named that was wrong or was a mistake?
James was given a new 6 yr contract by Boehly. Gilmour was sold before Boehly bought the club. Mount was repeatedly offered a new contract by the previous regime & by the new regime. He chose to leave Chelsea. Hudson-Odoi hasn't shown he merits a place in the first team. Chelsea have been extremely patient with him, they even turned down a £50m offer for him from Bayern Munich a few years ago.
Rudiger wanted Real Madrid & so wouldn't sign a new contract. Kante was incredibly injury prone & he was on £325k per week. Azpi was very tempted to leave Chelsea 12 months before he actually did. He only agreed to stay another 12 months because Todd Boehly asked him to.
So what players did you expect would never leave Chelsea?
As a Chelsea fan its absolutely crazy to see your team just crumble. Honestly it hasnt even been worth my time watching and buying tickets. There is absolutely no passion in the game anymore just money. Feel as if Chelsea need to be relegated or something for the club to think.
Wish you well, thankfully there’s no chance on this planet Chelsea are going down haha
Modern football
@dookiewookie7571 Buy tickets? I'd put money on it that you've NEVER bought a single ticket for a Chelsea match.
This is like a blackburn rovers type of crumble, Chelsea will forever find themselves either at the bottom of premier league or play at Championship start from now trust me
@@yanyeouleong7922 When a club has the kind of resources & financial backing that Chelsea does then you won't even see an Arsenal type of crumble, let alone Blackburn.
Never in a million years would I think a club will spend 1B in less than 3 years and be on the collapse
When you have idiots at the club then yes that is what happens sadly
Idiots is too harsh of a word concedering that to be a billionare u sre likley not a idiot tho understans ur point @Vizeh
And just before having won the champions league
And yet they complaining About city who spend less than utd and chelsea lmao
@@skullxishim no.... no they're idiots. They can be intelligent in another field (one where they actually made their money...) sure, but that doesn't make them intelligent when it comes to the sport of football
It's crazy that Chelsea not too long ago was doing well domestically, winning a few premier league titles, did well in Europe winning the champions league twice, won almost every trophy in the Abramovich era, constantly qualifying for the top 4 every season, and all of this was during a period in which there was no continuity when it came to managers, they came and even if they did well and won trophies, a bad run of form meant they lost their job changing managers year in year out, while winning trophies, and now despite spending over a billion dollars in the last 12 months, 5 different managers, broke the premier league transfer record twice just this year alone, Chelsea are simply an ordinary club right now, they finished 12th last season that resulted in them not playing any sort of European football this season, and also to start the season they've won just 1 out of 6 premier league games and they're struggling to score goals once again which isn't really a surprise and it seems like even sacking Pochettino and hiring another manager won't be the solution to Chelsea as right now there isn't a project at this football club right now, they're all over the place and I don't know when they're gonna be back in the right trajectory as when you want a project to click and have success, you need to get short term results and that's gonna help them in the long run, Todd Boehly has rushed things and never took a patient approach with this team hence why they're gonna continue to struggle and it's getting ugly right now how bad Chelsea are.
You say Boehly has not taken a patient approach, well neither did Abramovich, the important point is, Abramovich understood football and surrounded himself
with knowledgeable staff and even with frequent managerial changes always stayed focused on the end result. What we have now is a man with no direction,
nor understanding of football nor apparently any backroom knowledge , it is a recipe for disaster and that is what is unfolding before us
The Chelsea way in a sense is to kind of always be in some sort of chaos, criticized for sacking managers very often but always brought success
I aint reading allat
@tobaepebinuade5830 You are doing what I see so many people on here do, make an assumption that you know everything & that if you don't know about something then it's because it doesn't exist.
Because YOU don't understand what Chelsea are doing, because YOU don't know anything about the long term project Chelsea are implementing, you automatically assume there is no project, there are no plans.
There is a clearly defined & very comprehensive long term (10yrs) project at Chelsea. It is titled "Vision 2030". The head architect of Vision 2030 was Neil Bath, a 30 year employee of Chelsea. Neil Bath is also the man who since 2011 was the No.1 head man at the Chelsea academy & more than anyone else has been responsible for developing the country's leading academy at Chelsea. It was primarily his 'project' that led to Chelsea having the most successful academy & youth production line of any club in England. And for a certain period of time it was recognised as the leading academy in Europe.
What you also won't know is how Vision 2030 didn't come about under the new ownership, it originated when Abramovich was still in control. The first 7 year contract a player signed was under Abramovich.
And finally....when the club was being sold, one of the conditions that Abramovich was insistent on was that the new owners give a commitment to continue with the implementation of Vision 2030.
@@jameswiglesworth5004 This is just more nonsense & uninformed drivel. You just make stuff up to fit what you wanna say. No, Abramovich did not have much understanding of football in 2003 & we know this because he said so in one of the only two interviews he ever gave. He literally said "I don't know anything about football in England". He had only just watched the first football match in his life (a CL Real Madrid game).
And unlike Todd Boehly, Abramovich couldn't speak English. And unlike Todd Boehly, Abramovich had never even done ANY sort of business in the UK prior to 2003.
"Abramovich surrounded himself with knowledgeable staff"..?? Who? Name these people? The truth of the matter is you haven't got a clue who Abramovich took advice from when he arrived at Chelsea, not a clue.
It's simply unreal how clowns like you think you have anything to teach someone like Todd Boehly or Behdad Eghbali. Your brain doesn't operate on the same level. Todd Boehly is estimated to be worth $5.5b. He made his multi-billion dollar wealth from being extremely smart & from making shrewd decisions in business.
People like Boehly & Eghbali make their billions because they know exactly what they are doing & because they know how to be successful. These people simply don't invest huge sums into ventures they can't make successful. Huge investment corporations like Clearlake, & the other investors, don't do things recklessly.
You're saying that the other investors would sit back & watch another investor such as Boehly act in a way that would be damaging to their expensive asset?
Utd and Chelsea proving time and again, that spending money is not a guarantee for success
This is my biggest issue as a United fan. We're constantly spending money, but we don't have much to show for it. And what's worse is that we always seem to be tied to every single large/on the rise player that we might as well be Nottingham Forest at this point. And don't get me started on the mess that is the executive board
Got to do it wisely
Chelsea was spending money and having success until the ownership change
@@ebnest123 abramovich knew how to spend money usually they did have duds under him sure but he often was an expert in good signings
I feel sympathy for all of the recent managers including Lampard and Potter. How can you possibly expect a team to perform if you've got this amount of chop and change in the playing squad? Strikes me all as terrible management from Boehly and co.
Vizeh please do a video on Reading fc. Their collapse is hardly talked about but they are in a very very bad state currently and used to be a very well run club until 6-7 years ago.
Congratulations on your new bundle of joy mate 🎉🎉
Thank you man!
They had a promising pre-season, and their performance in the States had many people thinking they were going to return to European football, but the beginning of this season looks like the second-half of last season all over again.
Problem is that Nkuku is out and he was the main reason they looked better.
He is a clinical striker, someting they didnt have and curently dont have.
The preseason tactics were completely different
from champions league football to championship i can imagine documentaries being made on this from the USA to New Zealand
They deserve an All or Nothing Amazon documentary.
What, do you think this is Arsenal or Liverpool we're talking about? We're talking about Chelsea & unlike others we don't have long spells away from the top anymore.
Congrats to you and the Mrs on the baby Viz
Thank you man
Liam, you're wise well beyond your years, mate. Many good points here, but esp. this one: If the Chelsea system turns out to work, God help the beautiful game.
PS: Congrats on 2nd fatherhood.
Thank you mate!
as a Benfica fan, I'm enjoying the downfall
That final from 2013 still hurts i'm guessing
@@Vizeh and their conduct on the Enzo situation. our CL run could have been very different. but yes, mostly that EL final.
Fleeced a lot of money out of them at least
@@gajoaleatoriowe paid what you wanted?
@@gajoaleatorioBenfica pulled down Chelsea and Todd Boehly's pants with the Enzo transfer. Why are you complaining?
Far far far FAR too many players in the Chelsea squad and this is making this situation impossible to fix
Chelsea is somehow going to be an even more interesting case study in the next 3-5 years if they keep going at the rate they're going...
And some people were predicting Chelsea to be in the top 6 before the season started lol
That seemed reasonable, I thought they would be 6th as surely it can't be as bad as last year
Literally every single pundit predicted table/ youtuber predicted table had chelsea top 7, with my team brighton falling to 10th etc. People had honestly been fooled by another window of mass buying with no real chemistry between any of the players and expected immediate results.
Long live the chelsea way 😂
Glad to hear your wife and clover are doing well, congrats bro happy for you and your family
Thank you my friend!❤
Tuchel didn't sign all them players you mentioned, they were all signed under lampard. Tuchel was never really given a chance to rebuild, he had an idea a philosophy and should have been the man to spend the funds
He bought Sterling and Sterling is one of the worse players
@@Sjtoolsie is he really though or is he one of those that have suffered cause of the clubs lack of direction
I do think there's the aspect of Chelsea reverting to the mediocre also-rans they always were pre-Abramovich, the success was always built on a very generous house of cash, they could attract far more because Roman was the man with the money and he wanted trophies for his shiny toy, now that's over, we're seeing them revert back to type, they simply got to live the dream for 20 years.
You are aware of how the new owners at Chelsea have just spent more money in one year, & in 3 consecutive transfer windows, than Abramovich ever spent? They've recently smashed the British transfer record, twice.
As strange as it sounds but if Abramovich was still the owner then they wouldn't have spent anywhere near as much in the past year.
It also helps you be successful when you have bigger revenue year after year than most of your rivals do.
@@danniwilder2198 didn't ask, don't care, Chelsea are back to being shit again, stay mad lmao
@@unpoppablebubble If Chelsea were shit then they'd be like Liverpool or Arsenal or Spurs or Utd when they are shit & go away for 5 or 6 years at a time. Let's see if Chelsea are not a top 4 club for as long as the other clubs I mentioned sometimes go not being a top 4 club.
@@danniwilder2198 lol
Did you miss the intro? They've spent 1 Billion and still are awful 😂 so their success being built on spending lots of 💰 money is not the issue here.
Caceido for over 100 mil is insane while Spurs got Bissouma for 30 mil
Bissouma been at Spurs for 2 years now and has had one spell of 5 decent games…
When Roman left Chelsea have collapsed a lot i wouldn't be surprised if they relegated to championship
Wow, the clip where Poch is utterly clueless about Sarr was unreal. Only at Chelsea could this happen 😂😂
Shows what little insight you have. I doubt there's a single manager who could name every player his club have out on loan somewhere if it's a club that loans out a dozen or more players.
@@danniwilder2198 Sorry but its not like he's some random youth academy player who played 0 games.. he's actively in training, and not on loan.
@@hellotherereal He was on loan all last season & then as with all loanees he returned to his club, Chelsea, when all the players return from their summer break. But Malang Sarr has never been a part of the first team's training & is one of a handful of players who train separately, sometimes with the Development squad, sometimes on their own. Sarr is one of those players who isn't a particularly well known name & a player that hasn't been a part of the club's plans for a long time. Certainly long before Pochettino came to the club.
Sarr is one of the few players that was left at Cobham when the players went to America for their pre-season.
The only reason Sarr is still at Chelsea as of this moment is because he was quite literally the only player the club failed to move on in the summer. Ideally they wanted to sell him but if they couldn't then they'd try for a loan somewhere.
The club even got the likes of Lukaku & Ziyech out & to another club last summer. A sale of Lukaku, Ziyech, Kepa, would have been best but a loan deal was all Chelsea could do for now. So three loans & one non-mover & the last remaining player that's still at Cobham is Malang Sarr.
So I honestly don't see why there would be any need for Pochettino to know or have heard about a player in Sarr's position. He is literally sitting in the departure lounge waiting around until he leaves.
@@hellothererealcomplete 🧢🧢🧢 it was a super unfair question, is a big reason why Pep or Klopp never face such difficult questions😡😡
Note to future players, if you want to play football don’t join chelsea.
Until Todd Boehly, United was the worst run club, but the Americans are competing with each other to show how bad they are for football culture in Europe
Why? By selling 98% of your UCL, USC, and FIFA CWC winning squad because of one struggle season under the new ownership and multiple managed changes. That’s how. While Liverpool kept most of their players during their struggle season after success, Chelsea opted to do the complete opposite. That’s stupid club management.
One point that u failed to mention imo was how good of a owner abramovich was unlike boehly.
When Abramovich first cam in he didnt just mess everything up and send players out and in like boely did. Instead he gave our managerbat the time 4 good players and we got champions league that yr. Then he decided to sack that manager to get mouriho because of how good he was at porto. For those who dont know mourinho made porto the fist team out of the top 5 leagues to win the UCL.
That summer abramovich gave mourinho the players he wanted while keeping the players who were at the club these are the likes of JT and lampard. Unlike boehly he didnt just send lots of players out and in a few years. Abramoich built a empire at chelsea who always were hungry to win. And we became very sucessful. For the people who say chelsea were just built on money is very false. Abramovich was very smart owner. And we are seeing it now that money doesnt equal success with Boely.
Whatever he did in America with the dodgers doesnt look like its working rn. I wont right him and the board off early because they all have time to learn. Hopefully, chelsea fans are now going to recognize how good of a owner abramovich was.
Anyways love the new commentary content your doing Vizeh. Keep what you are doing and peace.
I do remember Abramovich was criticized many times for sacking managers too often, but it did work and kept the standards at the club high. That’s also because there was always a core set of leaders that knew what Chelsea meant to hold the line too
@@Vizeh forgot to tell u this that the last years under abramovich were not good tho he was able to keep us in a place where we could still win and I bet that it would have gotten better. Boehly came in here and took us to 12th…
@@skullxishim No, Todd Boehly never took Chelsea to 12th, the manager & the players did that all by themselves.
@@danniwilder2198 when did I say that? I agree the players are at fault also
@@danniwilder2198 tho i think things will start clicking soon fourfourtwos newest vedio basically explains why if you would like you should take a look
Cole palmer must be thinking to himself what the hell gave I gotten myself into... imagine signing for chelsea from city for game time and still can't get a start
Top video! 👌 Chelsea fan over 38 years here. I was there in the 80’s/90’s when we were awful and I’ve seen us get relegated before!
The last 2 decades have gone beyond anything I could have dreamt of as a kid, standing with my father watching us win the Champions League is a memory I’ll never forget, but you can’t stay at the top forever! Man United’s dominance in the 90’s and 00’s was swiftly followed by a decade of struggle. Now it’s just our time to return to mediocrity.
The difference between us in the early 90’s and now though, is that Chelsea have grown into one of the world’s biggest clubs and the money invested and spent on this team means they simply cannot accept bottom half of the table finishes. Europa League at a minimum should be demanded.
You’re 10000% spot on with your analysis of the clubs owners and their approach being similar to a kid starting a new save on Championship Manager. Sell off the entire squad and go on a spending spree without much thought about how you’d integrate them into a starting 11. Expecting 30+ youth signings to achieve top 4 is nothing short of arrogance and ignorance. It’s disrespectful to the other 19 teams in the league to underestimate them.
You’ve got it spot on about the 8 year contracts and massive salaries for kids who haven’t proven themselves or won anything. What is there to motivate them now? Yesterday I watched Disasi walking off the pitch as boos rung out laughing with a Villa player. Does he care? He’s not acknowledged the fans unhappiness and will leave the stadium in his Ferrari….
Players like Mudryk and Caicedo were signed on huge contracts, and they haven’t performed. We haven’t learned a thing from £90m and £300k a week Lukaku, who we struggled to give away on loan! These potential losses could put the clubs future in real jeopardy.
There’s a reason why other clubs are not doing it. If it were really that clever, we wouldn’t be the only ones!
If you took all the 2023 results over the last 10 months, Chelsea would be joint bottom of the league. 7 wins from 34 games. And people think saying we are in a relegation battle is exaggerating 👀
@Matt231985uk If you really are a Chelsea fan for almost 40 years then you should be ashamed & embarrassed by the utter crap you've written here. You are making assumption after assumption about things & not bothering to research anything you're claiming. For example: you are just assuming the players who've signed 7 and 8 yr contracts are on massive salaries. You said players like Mudryk & Caicedo were signed on huge contracts.
Mudryk is on £100k per week, Caicedo is on £150k. Romeo Lavia, 19, is on £45k per week. Of all the players on longer than normal contracts, only Enzo & Caicedo are on more than £100k per week.
In little over one year the new owners have reduced the annual wage bill by approx £100m.
Chelsea have not signed 30 youth players, nothing like it. No-one at Chelsea has said anything about expecting a top 4 finish.
If you had the first idea of what you're talking about then you would understand that what the new owners are doing is not only securing the club's future but hopefully its future success too.
Other clubs aren't doing things like giving longer contracts? So what, since when was Chelsea a club that didn't lead the way & set the examples? I'm sure other clubs will be watching Chelsea in the coming years & see how these 8 yr contracts pan out. I'm sure the other big clubs will eventually copy Chelsea's policy on this.
It reminds me a bit of when we used to see other clubs criticise Chelsea & their use of a large scale loan policy.
You can almost predict how these things play out......widespread criticism of the club & it's new & imaginative ideas for the game. For the first few years it's all 'Chelsea is ruining the game', 'Chelsea aren't playing fair', etc, etc. Then as other clubs see how, for example, loaning a large number of players to other clubs is actually beneficial to all parties concerned, so gradually more & more clubs start copying Chelsea. It happened with the policy of loaning players out & it will probably happen with the giving of longer contracts.
I feel like you nailed on the head on the 'young players already completing football even before starting it' sentiment, and I think that's the reason why they choose Chelsea. I feel like these are some lads that know they can just milk the next 8 years, and as long as they don't spend extravergantly and party all night, they can basically have retirement funds sorted by the time they're in the early 30's / late 20's; hence they choose to go to "play" for Chelsea over other clubs.
Think about how much the agents will be getting based on these deals too
Don't you think at some point these young players will want to earn more & be paid the really big wages at the top end of the game? And we don't see many players wanting to milk 5 year contracts, so why would they want to milk 8 year contracts?
@@danniwilder2198 Some of these players were getting handed £140 million/8 year contracts, you can bet they are looking at that kind of money and thinking this is most likely the best contract they are going to get over their career just based on expected future performance while they are still young.
@@DaybreakPT £140m contracts? Some have 8 year contracts but NO-ONE, absolutely no-one is being paid anything like £140m. Of all the new young players the highest earner is Enzo Fernandez & he is reckoned to be on around £150k -- £180k per week. Let's go with the £180k: £180k per week is £9.6m per year. That equates to a total of £76.8m over 8 years.
The highest paid player at the club is Raheem Sterling & he's on £325k per week. He's got a 5 year contract & 5 years on £325k works out at a total of £84.5m.
You would need an 8 year contract at £350k per week for the total sum to be £140m.
And no, you would be completely wrong to think any of the young players that Chelsea have recently signed will be looking at their contract & thinking it will be the best contract they'll get in their career. Each & every one of them will have ambitions that will include earning bigger & better contracts in the future. They know they're not on the really big money yet & they also know that if you prove yourself to be a good asset to Chelsea then they will reward you with a bigger salary. Just as they did with Reece James last October when the club gave him a contract worth £250k per week.
Anyway, what I've explained is what the normal practice is with players of 19, 20, 21, 22. Remember, Enzo is easily the highest paid among all the new players. Many of them are on much less money. Deivid Washington, for example, the 18 yr old from Brazil, is on just £7,000 a week. Lavia, Ugochukwu, Gusto, are on £45k a week.
Gallagher, Madueke, Chalobah, are on £50k per week. Jackson is on £65k. Palmer £75k. Dasisi £80k. Badiashile £90k. Mudryk, Chukwuemeka, £100k. Silva £110k. Caicedo £150k. Cucurella £175k.
Fofana £200k.
If you think Romeo Lavia thinks a contract worth £45k per week is the best he'll ever get then you're living in la la land. The same with Jackson & £65k per week. The same with Palmer, the same with all of them, they will all be hoping for much bigger contracts eventually. Malo Gusto will be looking at the club's other right-back, Reece James, & be saying to himself if Reece can earn a contract worth £250k per week then so can I.
And because Chelsea worked long & hard to make sure they only bought young players of the highest calibre they will be hoping a large number of these young players will develop to a very high level. There'll inevitably be a number of them that don't develop to their full potential, that's only to be expected when you've got a dozen or more very young players. The law of averages means not all of them will become top draw players but there's no reason why the majority of them won't become outstanding top level players. It's hard to see how players like Caicedo & Enzo won't reach the absolute highest levels in the game. Caicedo, for example, has all the qualities needed to eventually be as good as Kante was at his best. Jackson is similar to Drogba in a lot of ways & should be aiming to replicate Drogba's achievements.
Then you simply have no idea at all. The reason these young players have got to where they are in the game already is because they are incredibly ambitious. Someone like Moises Caicedo doesn't want to milk anything, all he wants to do is have a career like N'golo Kante had. He wants to achieve the things Kante achieved. He wouldn't even be able to comprehend the notion of just coasting through his career. And how long do you think a player who did such a thing would last if they had an attitude like that?
It's incredible that anyone could be so out of touch with the reality of something like this. Commonsense alone should be enough to make you realise how football players at that level just aren't like this.
The Russian Billionaire knew how to run a football club, from the time he bought it, up until he sold it
As Liverpool fan, biggest Boehly mistakes is letting go Jorginho, Kante, and Azpilicueta around same time frame. Of course, they are on decline but they are the leaders of previous generation of the club along with Chilwell and James. You can't have a pressured team without any leaders. There's reason Klopp want Milner and Henderson to stay for so long, because they are Liverpool leaders. We also have leadership/mentor group including Van Dijk, Salah, Robbo, and Trent. That's why Liverpool rarely have flopped transfer because the youngsters and new players were mentored by seasoned vets who demand really high standards on daily basis.
Meanwhile Chelsea signing too many wonderkids, kicking the seasoned vets and called them "deadwoods", and expect the newcoming kids to magically perform well without any guidance. That kind of thinking only works in FIFA and FM, and that won't work in real life.
My guess for short term solution is signing Jorginho, Kante, and Azpilicueta for maybe 1 year, then ask them to push the standards of the youngster until they ready.
Azpilicueta was planning to leave & return to Spain 12 months before he actually did. It was only because the club asked him to stay a bit longer that he was even at Chelsea last season.
Jorginho's contract was ending at the end of last season. He was on £325k a week, he was 31, & he was past his best & had been below-par for a couple of seasons. Was the club supposed to give a new contract & £325k per week to a 31 yr old player who simply wasn't good enough anymore? Or would it be better to let him leave a few months before his contract ends & thereby receive £12m for him & then replace him with a 21 yr old player like Enzo Fernandez?
Kante was also at the end of his contract. He earned even more than Jorginho at £350k per week. He was also in his 30's. Plus for the past couple of seasons he had been extremely injury prone. Should the club really be paying over £300k a week to these players who weren't being of much benefit to the team anymore?
Or would it be better to use that money on bringing in some highly talented young players that will be the future of the club?
@@danniwilder2198 why don't Boehly ask them to extend 1 more year then? Or let Jorginho goes for free next yead? They don't need to stay forever, they don't even have to play if it's neutering the childs growth, they just need to mentor whole bunch of kids until they are mentality ready and become leader in backroom and training ground. Current Chelsea crop of players don't have that many "leaders figure" of them aside from James who injured a lot, Chilwell. That's why they must play Gallagher every single week because he is the only supposed "vets" in the club. If I ask you as youngster for a field presence only and both of them plays bad, would you rather have UCL winnerJorginho as your captain or Gallagher?
My point is, no matter the circumstances, you can't expect these kids to grow well without guidance of proper senior who've got experience and demand the best for you (even though they were already declined).
Not every youngsters have the mentality of Mbappe or Bellingham. Some of them end up like Hudson Odoi or Sancho, Many of them have only just got their confidence after 1 good season, if they moved with high price transfers, they will pressured with expectation to perform, then if their next season turned out to be bad one they would crumbled under price tag pressured and booed on/off the pitch (especially with social media era nowadays). At this situation many youngsters fall and never become who they ever was.
That's why mentor/senior figure were needed, especially if your team have many kids with those situation. Sure it's ultimately back to the kids as guys like Sancho were just lazy, but the mentors presence sure were lowering the risk a lot.
@@dclan9813 Jorginho left back in January when he still had a few months left on his contract & so Arsenal had to pay a transfer fee. If he'd left at the end of the season then he could have left on a free transfer.
No club is going to offer players like Jorginho or Kante or Azpilicueta a new contract when they're on wages of around £300k a week just so they can mentor young players. And the squad needs to be around a max of 25 or 26 players.
Also, some of these players at the tail end of their careers often have one last thing they want to achieve. For example: Azpi wanted to return to Spain & play in the Spanish league before he retires. Rudiger had a good offer from Real Madrid & as we see with many players who get a chance to go to Madrid, it was something he really wanted to do. Similar thing with Alonso & Christensen & being offered a chance to play for Barcelona.
Kante had one last chance of securing a huge payday when he got an offer from Saudi Arabia. Plus he has been extremely injury prone in the last few years. Koulibaly, Ziyech, Mendy, Kepa, Aubameyang, Pulisic, RLC, Hudson-Odoi, Lukaku, Havertz, Kovacic, all of these players were better off leaving Chelsea.
Regarding Azpilicueta......he was pushing for the club to let him move to Spain before the start of last season, summer 2022, because it was strongly rumoured that Barcelona wanted him. However, Todd Boehly did exactly what you were asking for, he persuaded him to stay for one more season & if he agreed to do that then Chelsea wouldn't ask for a transfer fee, thereby giving him the opportunity for a more lucrative contract with whoever he signed for. The club did exactly the same this summer for N'golo Kante. Kante had one more year remaining on his contract but because he's been such a special player for the club it was decided he could leave on a free transfer. If I remember rightly then I think the club did the same thing for Petr Cech when he went to Arsenal. It's a way of rewarding a player that has been a particularly special servant of the club.
Chelsea could have forced Kante to remain at Chelsea for another year if they'd decided to enforce his contract but that would have been an outrageous way to treat Kante at this point in his career.
Thats what happens when you spend 1 bil on a fully new squad with players that come from completely diffrent systems. They signed 15 wingers and keep rejecting the idea that theyve needed a striker ever since costa left the club
Its okay bruh, if it turns out failing more and even more worse, chelsea will just 'load latest save'.
What’s controversial about it? Getting exactly what they deserve!
A new owner who thinks throwing obscene amounts of money at something without having the correct people in place to advise them & then doesn’t understand why it isn’t working!!
Granted, things have maybe gone even worse than the most pessimistic of people might have thought but they’ve literally thrown money to clubs for players that they had no idea how they were going to use them, the majority of which have little to no experience in elite football.
And what’s the answer? Get more investment so they can throw even more obscene money at it on even more obscenely long contracts!
@Tibbs72 How do you people go around making these assumptions when you know hardly any of the facts? Can anyone really think Chelsea don't know exactly who they're signing? It's so unbelievably dimwitted for someone to think anything you've said bears any resemblance to reality.
Sacking Graham Potter and getting Lampard was there biggest mistake
Crazy isnt it. Putin starts a war, Roman gets ounted by the government, Boehly comes in, clears out a bunch of staff including (an albeit boring) but proven winner in Tuchel, brings in a new crew then proceeds to spend the next year and a bit throwing money like its ultimate team just to end up witb a squad youd expect from Notts forrest (as of this comment.) Truly insane, but ive got no love for Chelsea so cant say im sympathetic too them.
DUDE! CONGRATS ON YOUR HEALTHY BABY!!!!! WISHING YOURE FAMILY NOTHING BUT THE BEST
Vizeh saying that Palmer wont play
Palmer :🗿
I wanna see Vizeh’s reaction when he finds out Chelsea pay Malang Sarr 120k a week… 😭😭
Wtf lmao
What happened? The new owners have made it their business from day one to tear down everything Abramovich built. Everyone sacked, right down to the groundkeepers, presumably so they can take the sole credit for any future successes (if there are any). It's like buying McDonalds and getting rid of the guy who makes the secret sauce. But it's OK, because you've got a better recipe, and a long term "project" to turn your acquisition into the most successful fast food franchise in the world. Utterly mental.
Now waiting for the sequel to this video
I was gutted when Caicedo and Lavia went to Chelsea instead of Liverpool. Now I’m laughing my arse off. 😂
Chelsea fans were crowing that they got Enzo before us too! They stole our new midfield! The bastards 😂
@@danthemanwhocancan5263 Never mind, after all, you did get, what's his name, oh yeah.....Endo Watura. And the other kid that didn't come up to scratch at Bayern Munich......Gravenberk or something.
Oh well, can't win 'em all I guess. Maybe next time you'll have more luck & get one or two of your main transfer targets.
@JAY1892 Laughing your arse off.....at what.....who you had to settle for in their place? Be positive, look at it this way....Chelsea signed Mo Salah when Liverpool had thought he was signing for them. He didn't, he changed his mind at the last moment after Chelsea swooped in with an offer for him. However, because Salah was only 21 & wasn't at the level where he was a regular in the Chelsea team he went out on loan &, well, point is he ended up at Liverpool & when he was in his prime too.
So, Liverpool may have missed out on Caicedo & of getting their hands on a future world class player on this occasion but as the Salah situation showed, you never know what might happen in the future.
I must say though, as a Chelsea fan it seemed only fitting that we should snap up this midfield diamond of a player because we have done so well when we have this type of player. There was Claude Makelele, then N'golo Kante, now there's Moises Caicedo. The first two were utterly world class & the third one, Caicedo, is sure to reach that same level before too long.
Still, there's always the signing of Endo Watura to cheer you up. LOL
@@danniwilder219811th after spending a billion pounds. Shameless 😂😂
Here is a song for Chelsea fans next season:
You’ll one day sing that
You’ll one day sing that
Championship champions
You’ll one day sing that
Ironic this comment coming from an arsenal fan as you guys won't be singing champions of anything
The thing that was not mentioned and probably should have been is that Chelsea that's not just new ownership and players, it's literally everything. Someone who left this window dont remember who said that the injuries are because they have very poor training structure. Was it always a thing? No. Why not? Because most (if not all) of 'the behind the scenes' people are also new. As Drogba said: I dont recognize my club anymore. Everything is new and how do you expect a new player/staff to build upon some established legacy and experience when there is literally nobody from the old days.
When you try to manage a team from the boardroom, this is what's happens. Selling Kovacic and Mount this summer was madness. Letting Rudigers contract run down last summer was ludicrous. You can't rebuild a whole team, including the spine of the team, and expect it to work in such a short space of time. Theres a real danger they'll be in a relegation fight.
If Chelsea end up relegated the club will be the most expensive EFL championship team
I personally love this downfall. I think the failure of this project is for the better of football. This is again another message that shows us that money isn't everything in this sport.
Bohley is trying what he did in American football. A team he owned rebulit a team with young players on long contracts. What I find strange is that he brings in a sporting director, and there has been no change at all in how they operate. They still sign all these "ballers" but there is no cohesion as to how they play. It is just young wingers who create and look good on a tick tok compilation. How can they be building a team for the future if they can't even play together now?
I would say I feel sorry for these players. Maybe I do for the first few they signed. Those players would have had no idea how chaotic it was going to be. However, some of the later players who have come in are plain stupid. Palmer would have played more at treble winners City than this joke of a team. Lavia is a back up to the most expensive player in PL history. Why go there? Ciacedo could have played for Jurgen Klopp and been surrounded by an ambitious, hungry squad, but he chose money over a successful career. There are many more, but it makes me question, who advised these players? Agents are clearly more interested in pay day than the careers of clients.
But in the end, the modern Chelsea was built on money; now they just don't win anymore. Long may it continue
I agree with that honestly
Lavia is the one that bothers me as a liverpool fan. He would've been a starter here with Bajcetic as back up, instead he's tied to what? An 8 year contract playing second fiddle to Caicedo and Enzo. Awful career move.
The modern chelsea wasnt built only on money abramovich was a fucking good owner and fans are starting to notice that now. when he fitst came in he didnt distrub anything and send players out and in. he gave our manager 4 playere and we got top 4 that yr. then he sacked him because he wanted to get mourinhho from porto who just won the ucl. he gave mourinho the players he wanted while keeping some the talent we had at the club before mourinho like JT and lampard. dam I mis abramovich
Also srry for my spelling ikl fix that later i was just in a hurry and im typing on a fridge dont ask questions lmaoo
Also caicedo didnt go for money he wnted to stay loyal for chelsea and simply money isnt the ony factor understand ur point tho
Vizeh this is my first video on your channel but there will be many. Absolutely insightful and incredible. And many congratulations on your baby daughter. ❤🎉
Can you do a video about enzo maresca (leicesters manager) hes doing bits and our style of football is sucha joy to watch atm
A big point about the way Chelsea are conducting themselves right now that not many people focus on is that Boehly's strategy is to take the jeopardy out of football and run it purely as a business with a complete bastardisation of a moneyball concept. There are no footballing reasons behind the signings and hoarding of many of the world's best young talent, it has been done solely for the means of future profit, as Boehly has realised that if you take a player from anywhere else in Europe and bring them to the Premier League, their market value is going to sky rocket regardless of form and on-pitch impact. Only one of the multitudes of young players bought has to succeed for this method to pay off, and with being able to amortise any costs over an 8 year period now with the ridiculously lengthy contracts handed out, it's going to mean any players they sell will be at the biggest premium possible, with being calculated as incrementally as possible in their finances. Chelsea is a club completely devoid of footballing philosophy, integrity and passion and that's all only been made worse by Todd Boehly, I'm personally delighted to see them fail and hope real clubs like Brighton carry on prevailing over this thoughtless, scattergun player hoarding profit operation disguising itself as a football club.
Agreed. Chelsea need to fail not because I dislike them, because their strategy is a daunting precedent to exist.
Fantastic way at looking at it, I agree with it man!
As a Brighton fan I have to say it is absolutely delicious watching Chelsea floundering above the relegation spots while we’re in 3rd.
They took our (at the time) best ever manager, our back room staff and one of our best players and they all flopped instantly and we’ve beaten them twice. Just lovely 😎
It has occurred to me that money is being syphoned somewhere - hence the number of players bought and sold. None of it makes footballing sense that's for sure. Over priced and over paid mercenaries, but it's in someone's interest to keep the money flowing.
@slightlyslowersongs Of course there are 'footballing reasons' behind everything the club owners are doing. Maybe you just ain't bright enough to understand what they are, did you consider that?
Yes, just like 99% of football club owners, Todd Boehly & Co are going to be running their football club business as a business. How were you expecting them to run it, like a charity?
You seem to be disgusted at the thought of a club owner trying to make his club profitable. Try to understand this basic principle.....the more successful the football club is off the pitch then the more that helps the club be successful on the pitch.
Has it come as a shock to you that the people who have invested huge sums of money into purchasing an asset are going to want to make that asset increase in value?
Roman Abramovich was unique, a one-off, you shouldn't compare anyone else that owns a football club with him & with the way he ran the club.
And let me put you right on something else......you accuse Chelsea of hoarding young players under Boehly. But the fact is Chelsea have fewer young players out on loan to other clubs at the moment than they have had in many years. It's true that the large majority of the squad this season are young players, but so what, is it wrong to build a squad of primarily young players?
If it turns out that in a few years the club was to make a healthy profit on any of the young players they've recently signed then so what, wouldn't that be good business? Is it wrong in some way if Chelsea sign a young player, then spend a few years developing that player, & then if that player isn't right for Chelsea's first team then selling the player for a good profit? Isn't that the business Chelsea are in?
Brighton are a 'real' club? What, like you're a 'real' knob? What the fuck is a real club? Because they are little & can't operate on the level that Chelsea does, that makes them a real club?
Chelsea Football Club has more passion & integrity than most others do. That's the reality of it & it's that that makes you so bitter & resentful. It's because of that passion & belief that has taken them to things like CL trophies & to 25 years of regular success.
Imagine spending over £1 billion in a year on players and go backwards. Not even PSG and Newcastle would spend that kind of money and yet get worse. It's no secret Chelsea are hopeless in goals for years even under Tuchel but never in my life they are awful as a team. Chelsea only won 5 Premier League games in 2023. That's borderline relegation form.
Chelsea’s spending will eventually catch up to them with these ridicolous contracts. They better start winning football games in the near future because imagine this expensive squad with their 8 year contracts in the championship, they would surely end up in administration.
Maybe its unfair to compare, day-by-day its more clear that despite the politics involved with Abramovic, he maybe demonstraded that only money and new players arent the solution. He also is seeing as a really good chairman and CEO (in contrast with others oligarchs). In sum, i see the real Cheseal's problem today is that guy who is a true leader (and sometimes a tough guy) together with the money, because in the majority of the time change one coach to another coach isnt enough and could even makes the things harder.
Todd bohely is proof postive having loads of money dosent mean you should buy a football club.
It went all bananas after Abramovich was robbed by the Government for nicking his club. 😮😮😮
Ikr people bringing politics and the hypocrisy of it is just down right laughable
The thing about chelsea is that it becomes a very unpredictable team with good coaching and team building now we are close to top 6 speaking from the future 😂
You know your team/staff have fallen grace when your drawing 0 - 0 against Bournemouth, not only that but also drawing them on total shots and shots on target. BOURNEMOUTH Chelsea needs 2 things. 1. a competent manager with a history of winning trophies (like La Liga, Ligue 1, Serie A or Bundesliga) not someone barely anyone has heard of. Also it didn't help Bournemouth invested into a decent midfield and a decent defence which is why they now have 3 points compared to Chelsea's 5 (its ironic that Bournemouth has 0 wins but only a handful of positions behind Chelsea who has 1 win and 2 draws)
probably the most embarrassing way to spend £1billion
Only Chelsea can spend 1 billion pounds and get worse. Abramovic is looking frugal right now
While Boehly and co are happy to play FIFA career mode, they should be ok. But as soon as they lose interest, it could be catastrophic for them. Unlike Abramovich, who was happy to wipeout millions, these guys will want every penny back. Could make Leeds financial implosion look minuscule if that happens.
I am Chelsea fan, I think some mistakes were made for sure. First I think after the takeover we should have done a few things,
1) kept the old board and staff through the transfer window.
2) keep petr chec
3) don't go asking TT to do the job of scout, negotiator etc, buy a ton of guys for TT and then end up firing TT all this could have been avoided if you did 1 and 2
I think this summer's transfer window was pretty good. A lot of players we didn't need were sold.
Like you said stability is key in adding in world class talent. But you need to build stability sometimes at the expense of results and Chelsea fans don't have that kind of patience.
I think good run of games completely changes the mood everywhere around Chelsea though. So here is to hoping.
Another top draw video Vizeh. Congratulations to your family on the birth of your daughter as well! Arguably one of the best football content creators on CZcams. Big love brother ❤
Abramovich justice
Todd and management are the problem. Not players, staff or technical team. The owners think this is baseball, or American football, or basketball or some American sport. Americans just mess up things everywhere they go, they create chaos, wars, business and now sports too. Which team in their right mind spends millions on young inexperience players, who on top of that don't have any major silverware under their belts? I believe Todd wants total control of everything and everyone at Chelsea. I think he sacked Tuchel because he couldn't control him, he needed a "yes man" manager, and Potter was perfect to get control. I mean there was no reason for Tuchel to leave the club and selling most of the players that won the champions league. And I also believe Conar got the captain's band because of how hard working he is, he isn't the best player but I think most of the young players that are there at Chelsea don't have the attitude to play for Chelsea. There's a lot of "cool guys" syndrome around the dressing room, it's like having 20 Neymars in one room, talented but not hard working. So Todd and management needed to take the system that was already there and enhance it. I just wish Puttin never invaded
I haven't watched football for a few years now and I didn't even kno what the hell was happening, but it hurts to see that the team that was once so dear to my heart is going through this. I was shocked to read that Abramovich is not the owner anymore and none of the players they had just five years ago are here, so it's really sad to hear this. I hope they will get back to the top. I also wished that they didn't sack Antonio Conte back in the days, despite having one bad season. They won the Premier League with him the previous season and then one bad season and they sacked him? They didn't even give him a chance. I hope they will sort things out. 😢
Feel for Maland Sarr hes a solid player that deserves a run of games at a stable club
lmao.
Could you do the decline of Stoke. Interesting topic ( in my opinion)
The problem with Chelsea is that they got rid of all mid players and signed a lot of players for big money and big contracts thinking that they're the future. But in reality, all are mids or one season wonders who don't have any experience in big stages, don't have leadership qualities. As all these players are new, they don't have chemistry also. On top of that it's very hard to get rid of them. This team is going to be a disaster for sure.
as soon as they started spending hundreds of millions i knew that this could only end in two ways, best team in the world or Championship
Best team in championship 😢
we are shit but we havent collapsed mate
Now Imagine the EPL without the big Money from Saudi Arabia, Qatar or US-Investors… How can most of them play so badly with all that money, while Bayern Munich for example have to look at their finances strictly and still more successfull? I think the EPL would be irrelevant without selling their soul to investors.
8:20 The problem is that some of those players don't have passion or lack the talent to play on a team with the scale that is chelsea. I seen every single match since Enzo arrived and you can tell the difference between enzo and the others who they bought.
Congrats on your daughter mate! 🎉 Wishing the best for you and your family. COYS
Thank you my friend❤
Saturday 16th December vs Sheffield United at home. Definite win....
I will say this, if this was Tottenham slipping into lower table mediocrity, the press would be howling and rival fans would be ripping Spurs to shreds. Yet Chelsea, 'World Champions' just 3 seasons ago, are down in the dregs and no one is saying too much about it.
I love Jacksons miss vs Bournemouth, really eying up when Sheffield united play Chelsea in a relegation scrap (that will be our only two wins this season, UTB)
for some reason it really triggers me when a team struggle to the extent of this, but trust me as a Sheffield United fan I have experience
Sorry about todays game lad
for gods sake
Hey sorry about today's game but you can also see burnley get battered by newcastle aswell to make you feel better in about a week, I don't feel good about our tie with spurs but hey one loss doesn't define your entire season, you lads might make it out of relegation
I'm a Liverpool fan and Man United actually aren't my most hated team, it's Chelsea and Real Madrid. Normally when a team is doing this bad I have some sympathy for their fans because I know how it feels, but not in this case. There's just so much about Chelsea that make them hateable and the current mockery they're making of football is one of them which makes it all the more satisfying that they're being punished for it.
7:28 there's no way any football fan wouldn't know Lukaku. He's like the reverse Maguire, but instead of a striker for the opponent, he's the defender for the opponent. Fun to watch.
Great vid btw congrats on your baby
I think all I can say on this is, as a non-Chelsea fan, and I think I speak for alot of non-Chelsea fans, with the way they are run, I'm really happy seeing them being so miserably unsuccessful. They've turned into the most soulless business-focused football club out there and the fact they haven't broken FFP after not making Europe in some way is beyond me.
You good man? Not making Europe in some time? You born yesterday?
@@CommunionCupsBy some way, they meant even being in the Conference League and getting the revenues from that, as little as they may be compared to the Champions League or even Europa League.
@@CommunionCups You good man? I have no idea what you're referring to or talking about? Other commenter gets it though
@@haha2134 Yea my apologies. I thought your comment said they hadn't made Europe in some "time". Not way. I was like, didn't they just win champions league 2 years ago? Haha
@@CommunionCups No worries, yeah I was referring to the fact that FFP wasn't failed despite last season finishing 12th and no Europe revenue of any kind to balance out the ridiculous spend
Not too bad,Poch now getting a tune out of this team, personally never lost faith and his man management is great, making Conor captain for the last couple of games shows in his performance, he's been brilliant, onwards and upwards.
I would love to see their player's contracts and wages, because this seems like it will financially damage the club
As a Chelsea fan, it sucks what I'm seeing. I grew up watching Chelsea from 2003 as a kid, and supported them for the last 20 years, I've seen the highs, but this is the lowest I've seen us sink.
Todd Boehly is absolutely fucking clueless, most of the directors, sporting directors, technical directors, etc. have been sacked or have left the club post-Todd joining. The main issue is that there is no stability as is said in the video, when you have 30 strangers in a room every season, and then the next season, a new group of 30 strangers joining the club all of a sudden, no shit there's not going to be any results whatsoever. Abramovich had stability, he had everything down to a tee, but Todd is just thinking he can run this football club as if it's the NFL.
We only have 3 players that are still at the club that have won the UCL. We won the UCL in 2021. 2 fucking years ago, and only 3 players remain at the club? One of them is injured, Reece James, the other is about to retire, Thiago Silva, and lastly, Chilwell. What kind of team sells EVERYONE they had except for 3 players? Hell, I can't even fucking name the lineup each game because I do barely even recognise any of the players in the team.
14:25 If half are gone in the next two years, then why complain about the long contracts? Contradicting points.
Chelsea also significantly lowered the weekly wages of their signings. So the longer contracts aren’t as bad as past Chelsea signings on massive FFP wage hits. Chelsea aren’t paying the wages they used to so it’s not like they’re giving the young players all the money in the world now. Crystal Palace literally offered Olise much higher wages than Chelsea were offering. Chelsea’s wages are relative to other prem teams now so the point where they’re getting too much money and no longer motivated doesn’t make sense. I feel like Vizeh hasn’t seen the new Chelsea wage structure
It's not controversial. Boehly, Eghbali and Clearlake have torn the club apart and left it dying.
It’s mad to think that this club has won everything there is to win, and now look like a side who will be battling relegation.
I love in that clip, Poch immedialty was thinking of the player, who he did not know existed , nothing else, like where is he, look after him
Forcing Abramovich to sell Chelsea was biggest mistake and that is reason Chelsea is in the gutters now. If Chelsea is not going to get relegated this season that would be great accomplishment!
lots of players coming in and out of Chelsea, you could've mistaken it for a bus station