Leadership is to lead by example :Bad leadership is setting bad examples for others to follow . A good leader knows where to draw the line and weighs heavily on every decisions he makes and knows the consequences and being accountable for his actions .
I always thought that when one faces suffering without judging oneself or others for their desire to be released from it, the desire for happiness and the aversion of pain one is able to be courageous and gain free will over right and wrong. I feel that this frees a person to do something to do something for the people without expecting anything in return, which is the mark of a true leader.
Well said Sir. Though I am constantly baffled at the choices the voters make. Knowing about all the corruption and kleptocracy around a certain party in particular, they continue to vote for them. What gives.
DAP is no different from BN. I saw a lot of similarities, corruption, racial politics & hypocrisy during their short spell. How can you not see it? What gives. Nowadays after rooting for reform for 20 years I don't bother to trust PKR & DAP anymore.
Then maybe try the newer parties Muda, Bangsa Msia Etc. Time for a change.. at least DAP have not had as big a scandal that is publicise worldwide .. by voting for a party that is renown worldwide for its corrupt leaders reflects badly on the voters too ..
@@keonglim4826 "at least" is an epitome of a bad argument. Corrupt is corrupt tho idek myself who to vote on the upcoming election but point still stand. The thing to blame is the system. It require the players to be narrated (until proven guilty) as corrupted just to survive in the politic realm and the players surely just do what they gotta do. Highly doubt there are clean so called leaders nowadays.
@EA “At least” means it’s all relative. Like you clearly said, you highly doubt there are so called clean leaders nowadays. (Although I agree in the majority, there are, a smattering of leaders with integrity). Vote for the leaders which is ‘least corrupt’ because one needs to use their vote wisely to lead the country. You would definitely not vote for someone you know is ‘dirty’ right? (And there lies my whole point). I agree the system is to blame but this is not utopia, and there are no perfect system. Each has it’s strength and weaknesses.
Leadership is defiined academically as 1. Authoritarian leadership 2. Transactional leadership 3. Transformational leadership. Our executive today is an example of Authoritarian leadership. The PM and Interior Ministry as example expecting all other branches of governance to obey to their whishes and wants. The fastest to show changes resulting from a new leadership. Often the easiest to mask poor leadership skills. 2. Our enforcement agencies and regulatory authorities are led by transactional leaders. Decissions based on what is in it for me/my team or best of my interest first and foremost and their sworn duties and reaponsibilities free of fear or favours. 3. Based heavily on conscensus building and closest to to involving the willing participation of a majority where it involves a shift in how an entire entity or organisations views and work culture. The slowest to show results or even signs of change but the most long lasting. Often mistaken for weak leadership but requires a high calibre leader to pull off.
apabila rakyat sendiri melantik pemimpin yang rendah moral dan juga yang tidak bermoral untuk memegang jawatan dalam kerajaan.. maka mereka ini sendiri terpedaya oleh penipuan mereka sendiri tentang perbuatan betul atau salah mereka our low moral leaders are themselves fooled by their own interpretation of rights and wrongs
All the politicians, be it from the ruling govt or the opposition do not care or bother about rights or wrong. They only bother if the right or wrong could help them win the election.
Though i dun really fully support all Tun's policy, he fits the most of the bill of wat the professor said... Sadly it is tun' s partial fault for not instilling much knwoledged to malay pple and they ended up supporting based on one who talk so much.
All this while..the majority are all rubbish politicians..they are not a leader definitely nor a statemen..it very timely .absolutely right to send the message across the present DIVERSION POLITICAL ACTORS AND ACTRESS DANCING IN THE WIND AND UNDERESTIMATE THE RAKYAT INTELLIGENCE...THANKS AGAIN FOR THE WAKE UP CALL FOR THOSE SI CALL POLITICIANS....
Perhaps if he becomes PM of Malaysia he could remove all the corruption and restore integrity and honour! If he's as good as he sounds, he's better than all the clowns 🤡 around.
I full agree with you Mr. Syed but in Malaysia it has all been misunderstood like i recently watch a vloger from Manchester a Malay fugitive Raja Petra residing there as he was born in Wales lucky for him. The thing that was very upsetting with him was instead of being a racial peace maker he to what i understood he claim that its the rights of the Malays as he claims the British gave them the rights do be the rulers of Malaysia then many generation after the Merdeka okay I do understand that too as the British wanted to wash their hands of the immigrants who were taken there like the Indians and Chinese to perform the labour work in estates and mining these people generation also deserve respect and i do agree they are hard working people but are always insulted for being there they are not imposing themselves but rightful citizens. Then why are the Malays such bad leaders especially the elite leaders 99% are kleptocrats is this also part of their ethical rights to steal? AM sorry for asking you this been watch your fair intelligent input being a Muslim why is it so difficult to bridge peace for the sake of the nation firstly not enriching themselves with greed?? Thank you!
a leader is a khalifah who does justice in the best interests of others and greater good. an anti leader is a person in the position of leadership abuses his power for his own greed and selfish objectives i have always had problems when someone inserts a negative adjective before the word leader. It just doesnt sound/seem right. A bad leader, a corrupt leader just doesnt fit in the concept of leadership.
Dr, can you give your opinion on recent issue of kids snatched from their mom by religious authority and wrongfully converted to islam. Mufti in this case defending their clear wrongdoing
if those who have complete structure of knowledge are reluctant to be leaders, the criticism of bad leadership means nothing, for peacock can never be from an educated chicken .
"God gives him the choice to choose to do what is right or wrong...." as said by Syed. Beg your pardon sir, your saying is flawed. Because there is no God.... God is a just an abstract concept of a man-invented belief system. (It's an outdated idea to the current more educated generations worldwide as opposed to olden generations who are illiterate peasants!) It should be - it's One's (inner) Nature to decide to choose to do what is right or wrong - which is many educated people think in this manner nowadays!
Disappointing video. Trying too hard to segway from original topic to politic inclination. So Syed, let me ask you again. Who do you think is the Genuine Leader to run our country? Anwar? Anyone from DAP? MUDA? Anyone from AMANAH?
That is for you yourself to decide. The professor is offering advice and not a political party speech. The fact that you can't distinguish the difference and leap straight to political inclinations, shows that you are 'taksub politik'.
@@bryanlee7295 Don’t as5 wipe him too clean of his false political narrative trying too hard to relate his speech to the reality of things we are living here. We are not his student. We have experience living in the country on both ends of the political divide. What he said as a Legend Intellectual individual is a shame as he fail to relate the reality of things to be a leader in the 21st century. and also fail to relate the reality of thing of how democracy works in the country. The Rakyat are too well-known for a false political narrative like this. This type of propa is the reason the Rakyat are not favoring the opposition anymore. These people can talk. Can stir shit up. But hide when the real question is being asked to them. So again Syed. who is this so-called leader in the country that you wish him to lead? remember to choose what we have. not an anime character dreamer.
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Well said Dr. Always not afraid to speak the truth. you’re too a leader.
A good advice to leaders and also to the people who have to choose. Hopefully, Malaysians learn to pick the right ones. Thanks Dr Syed
Leadership is to lead by example :Bad leadership is setting bad examples for others to follow . A good leader knows where to draw the line and weighs heavily on every decisions he makes and knows the consequences and being accountable for his actions .
I will add that Leadership is when a person knows what to do during a crisis and shows the way out of it.
Thank you Dr Syed Ali, well explained 🙏🏻
I always thought that when one faces suffering without judging oneself or others for their desire to be released from it, the desire for happiness and the aversion of pain one is able to be courageous and gain free will over right and wrong. I feel that this frees a person to do something to do something for the people without expecting anything in return, which is the mark of a true leader.
Well said Sir. Though I am constantly baffled at the choices the voters make. Knowing about all the corruption and kleptocracy around a certain party in particular, they continue to vote for them. What gives.
DAP is no different from BN. I saw a lot of similarities, corruption, racial politics & hypocrisy during their short spell. How can you not see it? What gives.
Nowadays after rooting for reform for 20 years I don't bother to trust PKR & DAP anymore.
Then maybe try the newer parties Muda, Bangsa Msia Etc. Time for a change.. at least DAP have not had as big a scandal that is publicise worldwide .. by voting for a party that is renown worldwide for its corrupt leaders reflects badly on the voters too ..
@@keonglim4826 "at least" is an epitome of a bad argument. Corrupt is corrupt tho idek myself who to vote on the upcoming election but point still stand. The thing to blame is the system. It require the players to be narrated (until proven guilty) as corrupted just to survive in the politic realm and the players surely just do what they gotta do. Highly doubt there are clean so called leaders nowadays.
@EA “At least” means it’s all relative. Like you clearly said, you highly doubt there are so called clean leaders nowadays. (Although I agree in the majority, there are, a smattering of leaders with integrity). Vote for the leaders which is ‘least corrupt’ because one needs to use their vote wisely to lead the country. You would definitely not vote for someone you know is ‘dirty’ right? (And there lies my whole point). I agree the system is to blame but this is not utopia, and there are no perfect system. Each has it’s strength and weaknesses.
Always love to hear your thoughts, always beneficial to my understanding on Malaysia politicians.
Rightly said...
Glad to come across your channel! Thankyou and bless you
Dr.you are man of truth royal salute to you
Thank yo Dr Syed. Well said.
What have you done to become this smart and wise so what should I do to become more like you?
May we be blessed.
Thank you for the reminders.
🖤
It’s clear as daylight.
👏
Leadership is defiined academically as
1. Authoritarian leadership
2. Transactional leadership
3. Transformational leadership.
Our executive today is an example of Authoritarian leadership. The PM and Interior Ministry as example expecting all other branches of governance to obey to their whishes and wants. The fastest to show changes resulting from a new leadership. Often the easiest to mask poor leadership skills.
2. Our enforcement agencies and regulatory authorities are led by transactional leaders. Decissions based on what is in it for me/my team or best of my interest first and foremost and their sworn duties and reaponsibilities free of fear or favours.
3. Based heavily on conscensus building and closest to to involving the willing participation of a majority where it involves a shift in how an entire entity or organisations views and work culture.
The slowest to show results or even signs of change but the most long lasting. Often mistaken for weak leadership but requires a high calibre leader to pull off.
Would love to hear your thoughts about the recent PRN Johor.
apabila rakyat sendiri melantik pemimpin yang rendah moral dan juga yang tidak bermoral untuk memegang jawatan dalam kerajaan..
maka mereka ini sendiri terpedaya oleh penipuan mereka sendiri tentang perbuatan betul atau salah mereka
our low moral leaders are themselves fooled by their own interpretation of rights and wrongs
All the politicians, be it from the ruling govt or the opposition do not care or bother about rights or wrong. They only bother if the right or wrong could help them win the election.
Though i dun really fully support all Tun's policy, he fits the most of the bill of wat the professor said...
Sadly it is tun' s partial fault for not instilling much knwoledged to malay pple and they ended up supporting based on one who talk so much.
All this while..the majority are all rubbish politicians..they are not a leader definitely nor a statemen..it very timely .absolutely right to send the message across the present DIVERSION POLITICAL ACTORS AND ACTRESS DANCING IN THE WIND AND UNDERESTIMATE THE RAKYAT INTELLIGENCE...THANKS AGAIN FOR THE WAKE UP CALL FOR THOSE SI CALL POLITICIANS....
Perhaps if he becomes PM of Malaysia he could remove all the corruption and restore integrity and honour! If he's as good as he sounds, he's better than all the clowns 🤡 around.
Yeah, better than any MP in the Parlimen.
I full agree with you Mr. Syed but in Malaysia it has all been misunderstood like i recently watch a vloger from Manchester a Malay fugitive Raja Petra residing there as he was born in Wales lucky for him. The thing that was very upsetting with him was instead of being a racial peace maker he to what i understood he claim that its the rights of the Malays as he claims the British gave them the rights do be the rulers of Malaysia then many generation after the Merdeka okay I do understand that too as the British wanted to wash their hands of the immigrants who were taken there like the Indians and Chinese to perform the labour work in estates and mining these people generation also deserve respect and i do agree they are hard working people but are always insulted for being there they are not imposing themselves but rightful citizens. Then why are the Malays such bad leaders especially the elite leaders 99% are kleptocrats is this also part of their ethical rights to steal? AM sorry for asking you this been watch your fair intelligent input being a Muslim why is it so difficult to bridge peace for the sake of the nation firstly not enriching themselves with greed?? Thank you!
a leader is a khalifah who does justice in the best interests of others and greater good.
an anti leader is a person in the position of leadership abuses his power for his own greed and selfish objectives
i have always had problems when someone inserts a negative adjective before the word leader. It just doesnt sound/seem right. A bad leader, a corrupt leader just doesnt fit in the concept of leadership.
Dr, can you give your opinion on recent issue of kids snatched from their mom by religious authority and wrongfully converted to islam. Mufti in this case defending their clear wrongdoing
if those who have complete structure of knowledge are reluctant to be leaders, the criticism of bad leadership means nothing, for peacock can never be from an educated chicken .
"God gives him the choice to choose to do what is right or wrong...." as said by Syed.
Beg your pardon sir, your saying is flawed. Because there is no God.... God is a just an abstract concept of a man-invented belief system.
(It's an outdated idea to the current more educated generations worldwide as opposed to olden generations who are illiterate peasants!)
It should be - it's One's (inner) Nature to decide to choose to do what is right or wrong - which is many educated people think in this manner nowadays!
Disappointing video. Trying too hard to segway from original topic to politic inclination. So Syed, let me ask you again. Who do you think is the Genuine Leader to run our country? Anwar? Anyone from DAP? MUDA? Anyone from AMANAH?
That is for you yourself to decide. The professor is offering advice and not a political party speech. The fact that you can't distinguish the difference and leap straight to political inclinations, shows that you are 'taksub politik'.
You should ask the same questions to yourself whose opinions are as good as anyone else's - to decide!
@@bryanlee7295 Don’t as5 wipe him too clean of his false political narrative trying too hard to relate his speech to the reality of things we are living here. We are not his student. We have experience living in the country on both ends of the political divide.
What he said as a Legend Intellectual individual is a shame as he fail to relate the reality of things to be a leader in the 21st century. and also fail to relate the reality of thing of how democracy works in the country.
The Rakyat are too well-known for a false political narrative like this. This type of propa is the reason the Rakyat are not favoring the opposition anymore. These people can talk. Can stir shit up. But hide when the real question is being asked to them.
So again Syed. who is this so-called leader in the country that you wish him to lead? remember to choose what we have. not an anime character dreamer.
@@azmanahmad776
Then, who do you think is the 'genuine' leader - should lead Malaysia based on your living reality of the local political situations?
@@siewkonsum7291 Lim Guan Eng.