FIVERR Vs AI - Is this the END for ARTISTS?...
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 9. 08. 2022
- 10% OFF ALL MERCH with code "LASTCHANCE": draw-with-jazza.creator-sprin... - don't miss out, this classic merch is going to disappear soon!
--------------------------------
đïž GET MY APP, BRUSHES, MERCH and MORE!
www.jazzastudios.com/pages/shop
âš MERCH - Shirts, Hoodies and more:
www.jazzastudios.com/merch
âš ART PRINTS and POSTERS:
www.redbubble.com/people/jazz...
--------------------------------
MORE OF ME! - Follow/Sub âŽ
--------------------------------
ⶠDAILY VLOG: / @jazzavlog
ⶠInstagram+IGTV: / jazzastudios
ⶠTikTok: / jazzastudios
ⶠTwitter: / jazzastudios
ⶠFacebook: / jazzaofficial
-------------------------------- - ZĂĄbava
10% OFF ALL MERCH with code "LASTCHANCE": draw-with-jazza.creator-spring.com - don't miss out, this classic merch is going to disappear soon!
I already got your cup and Iâm always using it!!
Hello there random people đ
Hi
Im sowwy i got no money
I love art tho
As a fiverr artist, seeing other artists doing that sort of stuff and ruining the name and legitimacy of fiver is extremely discouraging
I can imagine that.. there isn't a more controlled platform?
Yea it makes me sad of the scammers getting the money rather than real artists. Thatâs why starting off on fiverr would be super hard as all the no stars are usually scams.
Tbh it's his or his team fault that they chose unverified artist who have no reviews and no proves to show that they are actually legitimate. Like how can u be this stupid!
@@irtissayo5389 sad but no
I know it is discouraged because more people are less likely to buy commissions from artists
This video was just depressing, not because of the AI, I have no fear of AI at all. But for fiver. Those scams absolutely broke my heart.
I for one welcome our new AI overlords.
All he had to do was find people with good reviewsâŠ
Fact- nearly all pro AI comments have likely been sent by AI !
If one had access to DALLE and were ALSO able to use one's own imagery as a factored in resource base ( that presumably couldn't/ wouldn't be shared by others using the service ) you might get more individualized ^ 'human' results.
@@rickh3714 I agree with that. Although when it takes your own image it tends to copy the exact shapes in it rather than being able to identify concepts you want it to run with.
You should fear AI.
Even the $240 tip artist did not create the art piece heâs deliveredâŠ
Unicorn is the horse from âSpanish White Horseâ by Julia MollâŠ
Itâs flipped and with a horn⊠OMG
We need AI that can detect traced / flipped / transformed stolen art, existing reverse image search is not good enough for this
Damn, I just googled it and itâs true, so sad.
But that's called stealing like an artist because he used the horse as a model for a full painting of something completely different.
@@Shajirr_ Ye but we will forget about these scammers and generate AI images directly. AI art is a new born and doubling in performance every 12 months, these AIs are the worst that will ever be.
10 years and art fiver will not even exist
that person had good reviews as well
guess fiver is just a place to get scammed
The last fiverr image was AI generated. It has the characteristic noise patterns that result in them, some were probably photoshopped, but they left some that are quite noticeable in the rainbow and horse hair. Also the lighting style suggests that it was probably generated with Midjourney (I'm almost 100% sure of that tbh)....
Which is better Dall-e or mid journey?
@@whitepouch0904 mid journey
@@whitepouch0904 Midjourney is better for artistic/creative styles, but it has a style that is almost instantly recognisable
Dall E seems to be better at following specific prompts, better matching output to your prompt, which other AIs can struggle with, it has the largest set of concepts that it can understand.
Unless its censored, then of course you get nothing or a possible ban.
@@Shajirr_ thank you for that info. If I ever used this kind of AI it would be for my masterâs school works. So I need something with Dall-e functions.
@@whitepouch0904 what degree are you doing? If itâs an art or visual communication degree isnât it just cheating? Just pay someone in your class to do your homework then, instead of feeding some machine. Obviously money isnât an issue f you just gonna type out your visual arts degree.
Let's not forget that without the millions of digital art and photography that artists post online, the AI would have nothing to work with.
that would also mean that if ai was the only thing to go off of, it would combine into a massive blob
Let's not forget that without the millions of sweat shop workers that make clothing for a minimal wage, the first world would have nothing to wear. See the similarities?
@@_Encie it's not similar. We can still produce clothes without slavery. AI works a different way, it needs something to work with. You can't train an AI to do something without material and data to start with.
@@smji5269 an artist needs references too ...
@@_Encie Did you just compare freelancers to modern day slaves?
I thought, I would find out where the difference lies between the work of an A.I. and a human artist.
What I gathered was, you can't trust anyone just because they have a Fiverr account lol
Ikr why didnât he ask for progress shots and or proof before commissioning or paying the full amount?
@@ginascreations612 I agree, there are certainly steps you can take to make commissioning work more safe.
But it's probably just more fun for the video to show a badly photoshopped picture instead of an revision process.
Notice that everytime what looked like an actual original piece was created they have a rating on their account. I know that its hard for breakins to get work, but man when your paying 100+ dollars for a piece from an unknown without any reviews big red flag
It really disappointed me because if he wouldâve done those small simple things most likely wouldâve known and then that money couldâve been given to actual hardworking artist
Also doesn't help that Fiverr is kinda crap as a site, one with how much of a pain it is for mobile users to create a profile and two with all non-vetting.
As an artist it is my humble request to everybody, please give work and money only after ensuring that the artist is genuine.
how?
Iâm not an artist and this pisses me off. I feel so bad for all creators out there, so many con men ruining reputations.
I'm not worried about AI stealing my job. I'm more worried about Etsy shops stealing it and selling low quality prints of my work.
Friend of mine has had that a lot recently. Moreso with other sites, not etsy. I've done so much messaging people and telling them off. Plus like you say they just take it from insta or something and stretch it and don't even know what they're doing having it printed in such low res. It's depressing. But one had a review saying it was blurry etc. so i knew their deal. My friend is experimenting having quite a clear watermark (which obviously isn't on the legit prints she sells).
Yea the watermark is a must
Simply, DO NOT POST your artworks online, without a fullwide visible watermark. Poeple who love your art pay and contact you. Dont worry putting offensive watermarks.
you should be, you can sue the etsy people, but u wont be able to do it do the AI that steals artists works and combine them whatsoever.. not to mention big and small corporations will use the AI and deprive artists from jobs becuz its cheaper to buy a program that will generate some logo for you from others people works than paying an artists to do an original one
@@JeM130177 bro tell ur friend to hide their watermark in their art please!!, recently seen others doing it and have been doing it myself not taking chances bc ppl are opportunistic
You should try to generate some AI art and then try to finish it by hand, or use it as a base to paint something in it :0
this.
makes me feel weird about ever posting art online...even though I'm not entirely sure where they source their images (web crawling maybe?)
I keep trying to get it to give me half finished sketches but it just gives me finished sketches of things cut in half.
@@Christopher_Gibbons maybe try using the word "unfinished" or just "sketch", "uncolored", "rough sketch"
This is something artist Loish did, they generated a prompt of "Loish style artwork" on the free version (so it couldn't do a face) and then used it as their sketch and finished it from there, looked really good.
1980: AI will never beat someone at chess, it's to complex
2000: Ok, but AI will never succeed at Go, because it's too intuitive and even more complex that chess
2016: Ok, but AI will never be as creative as real artists because it can only rely on data already created
2022: Ok, but AI will never turn against us and make us to slaves
what use would it even have of making us slaves
Bruh đđđđ
feels like the robobastards are coming for all of us slowly but surely xD
I don't want to be that guy, but I think they can't do that unless they're made to learn how people feel like anger, sadness, joy, etc.
3/4 already proven by AI. wait for next
White horse for the unicorn at the end belongs to Julia Moll it seems "spanish white horse". I would suspect the clouds may be swiped from somewhere as well, this is a photoshop image again. Fiverrs just a bad place for scams it seems, approaching people on their actual pages on say artstation, deviant art, etc etc, might yield better results.
Definitely dispute those transactions with fiver if you haven't already.
Also Alternate Title: I paid fiver artists $1200 and got scammed.
the crazy thing is Fiverr is mostly siding with the scammers and not with the customer
Omg
@@turboterps Because Fiver want to get those % from customer
I also recommend looking for fiverr artists with long and good reputations, so that you're more likely to get someone who is honest. You can check their reviews section to determine both. 1, 0
@@14bqdonk I don't get how it always goes like this. Can't they see a bit further, to the obvious even, that satisfied customers means more customers!?
I think y'all had the wrong approach. You should've ask for the commission of an artist who specializes in x topic and then ask the AI to produce an image based on that, seeing if the artist gets outdone in their own element
This
Next experiment!
That's a different question.
This video showed what happens when you need a certain image and pick an artist/ dall-e to create it for you.
Both are interesting questions.
AI vs Jazza
good future video idea, upvote so he sees it
As an artist that works on Fiverr, this is embarrassing :(
hahahahaha beat by AI
@@hugh.g.rection5906 shut up
time to look for a new job
Sorry to hear, I know some greats artist to definitely do original work. Plus Fiverr is so convenient compared to DevientArt or any other sites
The fear should not be ai in itself but AI used by scammers like these to saturate the art market and undermine actual artists. Obviously it's gonna be hard to tweak it for them but i believe they might eventually work around it.
As someone who has used fiverr many times now, and also fell into a few frauds, I can see you doing all the mistakes. ^^''
You chose an artist with 0 reviews, no prewies artworks made on the site and displayed. This is never a good idea.
Also if you see someone display lots of different styles over multiple or just in one gig it's usually stolen art.
+ If skeptical do some image reverse searches and see if you can find the displayed arts from different artist.
Also, look closely at the images displayed, most of them feature an erased watermark where the OG artist signed it.
Also, someone haggling the price up that drastically is never a good sign.
And lastly, DON'T ACCEPT THE PRODUCT! if you recieve the final product and it's clearly a fraud, never press the accept button. If you are not happy press the "i am not happy" Button. If it's fraud,report it to the support and ask for cancellation to get your money back.
Und wegen Leuten wie dir Sitz ich dann 800 Jahre an banalen Revisionsarbeit
@@veteraaan2 well if it is what you offer
And the fact that you have to go through all that just to confirm the artist kinda paints Fiverr in a bad light because the site's job was supposed to be securing both the artists AND commissioners but sadly, they seem to only care about the money now
I'm pretty sure Jazza knows this, but he is choosing to get scammed because it's funny for the video
I have to disagree with you on your 1st reason. Just because I person has 0 reviews doesnât mean they have a higher risk of scamming you, thatâs could be a new artist trying to grow
It's worth pointing out that most of the artists in this video had 0 reviews, which I wouldn't necessarily trust with hundreds of dollars lol. I also wonder if the ai could accidentally include copyrighted images, since some of the stuff just looks like multiple pictures put together into one (but I don't know how it actually works) still, it's cool to see the stuff that ai can put together and it looks like a good tool for quick concept art.
It can't use copyrighted images but I'm too lazy to explain why lol. It draws on concepts and it gathers these from images but not with enough specificity
What the ai does is make a noise map and then go over the billions of images in its database to find shapes resembling the words of your prompt in ever so smaller details till it thinks it has it all correct.
No, the AI doesn't combine existing pictures, it's synthesizing entirely new images.
While it can't copy existing images, a lot of them sure looks very derivative of existing work sometimes. The AI doesn't know when it makes something that looks like something else, you could end up with a fake looking copy of another artist work on purpose or on accident by invoking their name or genre.
In my countyâs copyright and right of ur own picture is extremely strong and I could see a future problem with AI especially with artist them self
In 9:36 the paintings the scammer used in his profile, are all from an artist called Carlos Ranna, he's my art teacher and its kinda sad seeing his work being used for scamming people.
so they were all scarmmers
Those photoshops were ridiculous! The last one was incredible đ€Żđ€Żđ€Ż
Would like to see this revisited at some point but only with artists who have at least a few reviews, a lot of the scammers here had 0 reviews and you were paying them hundreds or dollars. As someone who works as an artist on Fiverr, you have to start off small, and then if the demand is there you can start charging more, it's the only way to stay competitive. You can't just create a new account and set your starting price as something very high because nobody would trust you (and with good reason, judging by this video).
This video was so sad for me. I'm a fiverr freelancer. I do mostly graphic design and I can't understand how people can offer to design a logo for $5! I was thinking, I'll start my gigs at $50 and try to explain in the description that you can't expect to get something good for $5. But now it seems that asking for more without reviews will make me look like a scammer.
Yes i also work at Fiverr and this is very true. I also would like a part 2 of this video with people that have good reviews.
@@adeadgirl13 The worst thing is when sellers that have like 300 reviews still charging 5$ for no reason.
Like honestly, they could charge 10 or 15 and work 3 times less for more money.
EDIT: Actually much more than 15 when you have 300 reviews.
@@adeadgirl13 oh same with me and music. I look at some of these people, and it's like "I'll make a beat, mix, and master it for only $5 and within 3 days." and just think of how lowly these people think of themselves. I can't compete with that. Make an entire track, mix it, and master it with unlimited revisions within a week? yeah no.
I thought that art categories is the only non scammer services. There are actually a lot of fake art gigs. Is there a better place with real artists?
At 10:50 , that art is also looks like photoshopped "Spanish White Horse" by Julia Moll with some edits and some midjourney background.
It was identified by another commenter @Nigel Hirth.
Your 100% correct about the horse, but idk how you could prove the background
Oh noooooooo. Thats heartbreaking
@@CherryBlossom-mh6vv I have created atleast 1k+ image on midjourney and that abstract smokey background arts is a very common elements of the AI
@@macavitymacavity9504 makes sense, so all of the horse attempt were fakes, sad
@@CherryBlossom-mh6vv well I'm a digital artist my self and for me this AI Generated image will be just another tool for me to level up my art, just like how CSP have a 3D tracing model feature that help me create faster Webtoon.
This AI image will hugely impact my the artsy part of my webcomic, now I no longer need to spent 4-6 hours a day creating background for it.
We are born at the start of something big, so buckle up because it's gonna be a one hell of a ride.
Watching this video while taking 200$ fiverr project for 10 cartoon illustrations makes me feel relieved that even i use pinterest to get some photo references, in the end i make the illustration fresh and original.
I used to draw everything from my own imagination, and image references is just a reference. I draw my own illsutration because i love this and i had choose this thing to be my career.
So, the money orientation isn't at the top priority, but the satisfy when i can draw client's brief, and they feel satisfied with my work.
I hope we as Artists can still work and make money comfortably. Amiin
Sure, you can still beat the AI if you are an experienced artist. But the availability of such an option will create strong competition for beginner artists, making it much harder for them to be in the field long enough to develop a decent skill.
Midjourney is already beating 90% of pro illustrators. Also the speed of working matters too, not just the end result. AI can whip out 10 images in the time it took a real artist to get his equipment, canvas, brush and paints ready. Even so-called "speed painting" digital art takes usually minimal 1-2 hours to have decent image. AI can do the same in 1-2 minutes, probably with way more detail
Also this will affect kids and teenagers. Who will get demoralized, and never even start learning the real skill
"AI will save the world" doesn't really compute.....does it? But anyone can CALL themselves an artist and many people do.
Commercial art is bound to decline since highly customizable visuals will be able to be generated at the push of a button.
On the flipside, art for the sake of art will be facilitated with AI-generated reference material.
@@shredd5705 That's what my concern is more than the effect it has on jobs of existing artists. In my free time I try to improve my digital sculpting skills, I started years ago but its just a hobby and not a job and never will be, I'm fine with the progression I see for myself and that'll be it. Still, 3d will be next on the menu for machine learning and go the same route as 2d is going now. I'm not sure that if I was born into an AI environment where all the mechanical skillsets are executed by software and only the creative decisions are left to humans that I would ever get motivated to do anything else but that, decide what the software will create with text or speech. I don't really think that's a good thing tbh but a lot of people compare it to cutting out the boring tedious part, which I find a bit weird. And even tho I say I'm fine with improving my mechanical skills for the sake of it and not having it bound to a monetary aspect, will that still be true once I can get an even better result for way less time and effort using AI in the future? I'm not sure that my motivation will survive that experience.
When looking at the painting requests you got scammed on, it clear theyâve used a photoshop filter to get that effect as none of the brush strokes correlate to the direction of the colours.
Which one?
@@halloooo1duuuuu it's just sad that we've come to a point where scammers are so widespread that someone has to unironically ask which one.....
so for the most part this ended up being a competition to see whether humans or AI are better at impersonating real artists
Honestly it felt like I was just watching jazza get ripped off by artists
Just had a convo about this! As a traditional artist myself, I don't worry about collectors suddenly giving up the desire to own individually created artifacts. The paintings that I've sold the fastest with the most interest were because of the stories behind them, not because they were technically difficult.
Concept artists will get hurt, which sucks. People will certainly get fewer of those "sketchy" jobs that pay well ( artists know the ones I'm talking about). On the bright side, poor folk can make art for the book they just wrote. Kids can develop game worlds or inspire themselves with AI prompts. Who knows! It's gonna get weird.
But at the end of the day, not many people go into art with the dream of making money. I'll still be doing this shit if no one is buying it. lol
Its all pros and cons, as someone who can struggle to find references for certain visuals and so forth, this seems like a great tool for me. And also there is something sad to me that i cant translate my thoughts as well as an Ai and also thats like being sad im not as smart as a humongous amalgamation of code. I think it really depends, for some working one on one with an artist and the communication barrier of ai will be off putting, for others not so much. Only time will tell
I wouldn't rely on AI for reference, you're baking the lighting, anatomical and perspective problems of the AI into whatever you make if you do that. Same issue as trying to learn anatomy from stylized manga art. You have to start with what's real and build a good foundation before introducing someone else's filter into your work and practice.
I have to say this video makes me worried. I don't like "artists" (most seem to be scammers and not really artists) being put up against these AI programs. It's crazy to see people starting to use these ai programs and not hiring real artists. I feel a video like this may add to that as well.
Why hire someone who might not even finish your art when you can ai generate it?!
As a freelance artist this movement does worry me. People use to joke about how "the computer just does the work for you" when we draw digitally and now these programs are.
Also the fact that they use a data base filled with art, photos etc to make these. Most likely the artists in these databases have not agreed to have their art used for this as well.
I just wish as a fellow artist this video was either done a different way or not done at all.
As a working artist (drawing and painting) your future is gonna get pretty bleak. This stuff is improving at a astounding rate. Don't spend the next five years learning to draw. Spend that time learning to utilize all these apps into a functional workflow for speed and effeciency. But you have bigger issues...
Add to this monster the idea of CRISPR babies and the enormous benefits it will have - but not for you. In a couple of generations human beings as we know them will be a thing of the past. If you can cost-effectively genetically modify humans to be smarter, faster, more beautiful then we are redundant. It's weird, almost every tech development , from self driving cars, boston dynamic's robots, midjourney AI, 3D printing etc is replacing physical labour. It's like man's answer to the Garden of Eden. We don't need God to go back there. We can counter "in the sweat of your brow" with and machine server power. The writing is on the wall. I mean, when you have silicon valley intrepreneurs waving normal human beings as a burden and glorifying a "new designed haminity" then we are pretty much damned.
I think nobody is talking about the copyright problems cause this is a developing technology, and these companies are kinda tricking people through half a century of sci-fi cliche and without explaining what AI and artificial neuronal network is.
The only reason it is so detailed it is because of artists and the art they have put on the internet for 2 decades. if AI art gets more mainstream I presume the laws for Data protection will get heavier, like a lot, cause there is a lot of stuff these companies have to explain.
what if a graphic AI makes adds for condoms, and one of the photos it has learned from was of a minor?
What if Disney art, the same people that wanted to sue a parent for putting a picture of spider-man on his son's grave, gets fed into the machine?
In the future artists, or anybody online, will have to specify if they want their datas to be used for machine learning, or will even have to be hired to teach the machine. And if this AI art gets mainstream, it will be absurdly censored. like, in some AIs you can't even write the word corpse in a prompt.
@@snaphaan5049 Until there's a black out.
@@MitridatedCarbon I hope that if it does become more main stream things do change. But there's already so little protection for artists with their art online now adays. You have to slap huge watermarks on your work so people don't take it, repost it, and claim it as theirs.
Places like Facebook and deviantart have already opted you in this because of their tos saying they can use your art if you post it on their sites etc.
@@MitridatedCarbon If all these Fiverr artists are getting away with basic super obvious plagiarism. You should realize the law is highly overrated in it's ability to be enforced. And all it takes is someone to release a good open-source art AI for people to train it themselves without being limited by regulation, a great example are the pornographic deep fakes of which were banned on mainstream platforms but are still being created constantly.
Gonna be honest, this whole AI art vs human art is scarily reminding me of the plot of Suchart. It's an art game that's been shown off on here, the plot is that you're one of the few human artists, and in-game people will seek you out purely cos you're an actual human. It's a really fun game but it's kinda terrifying that people are actually having to start thinking about stuff like this
Eventually the Internet will be nothing but bots and ai, if it isn't already and hasn't been for years
The art at 3:45 looks like a "wombo dream AI", and that can explain why it is unfindable, also that AI is very good at ignoring specific things, like the vase
It's even got that discoloration most AI has
Yup i was just about to say that it looks ai made itself, and thats why u cant trace it back. Very very similar to wombos style. The real downfall of artists is not gonna be AI doing better, but artists using AI without the customer realizing and not doing any work themselves
I donât know that he said he couldnât find the image in the internet. The text he put on the screen was that he couldnât find the âartistâ whoâs work he had commissioned.
I'd imagine that those ripoff artists saw the cover of the book "Steal Like An Artist" book by Austin Kleon but never actually read the contents.
This actually inspires me to continue my career as an artist.
And reminds me that itâs not only about being specifically highly skilled, being truly original, truly human really giving it your best to honestly convey message or emotion..
AND doing it As Impecably as possible.. thatâs The Hope for an Artist, there will always be someone interested in sincere dedication and honest work
Who needs to fear AI when the true horror is art scammers
exactly, the people who abuse AI is the problem and not the AI itself.
Cant agree more.
Like people who use phones can use it to help humanity, or scam people. We just need to be aware
@@kusog3 Nukes aren't the problem, people are. That's why I think I should be able to own a nuclear weapon.
...because of scammers , real artists have less costumers and now that there is AI , why bother paying and artist who could be potentually a scammer , when you can get the art you want for free .
@@jmhorange Yes, because a bot, the sole purpose of which is to generate images has the same level of danger with a hunk of metal capable of leveling cities.
What a great analogy that absolutely helps your argument.
The unicorn in the Kylearts picture @ 10:50 is taken directly from "Spanish White Horse" by Julia Moll.
DAMNIT
Sheesh
oh my fucking god what
how are these people so successful via such shitty dishonest work?
Actually tipping a scammer. Damn.
omfg thats fuckin disgusting. like when he said faith in humanity restored i actually felt it and then i saw these comments and compared and yeah ..same exact horse
Seeing the first daguerreotype around 1840, the French painter Paul Delaroche declared: âFrom today, painting is dead.â When I was a young musician, and Casio had just begun selling digital "instruments" on late night TV, I had a terrible fear that music was dead before I'd even begun my career. As an artist, I don't feel threatened by AI, I feel inspired by it. Any fool can pick up a paintbrush. It's what they _do_ with it that (sometimes) becomes art. AI is just a very cool, interesting paintbrush.
Agreed
The implications are for commercial artists and designers. Now, all clients need to do is turn their briefs to an A.I generator, rather than to an artist or graphic designer.
@@michealokeefe2221 Have you worked with any of the currently available art AI? If you had you'd probably come to realize that just like any other artistic tool, AI requires practice, patience, and skill to achieve the really stunning effects you're seeing. Yes, it's faster and easier to achieve them using the AI, and _sometimes_ giving an AI a really simple prompt, like, "Show me a cat wearing a tophat" or whatever, can yield reall great effects, but that's really not the case most of the time.
@Cassowary Egg I'm gonna guess you don't have a lot of experience with creating images using AI. There are simple basics you can achieve "easily", sure. AI has no trouble serving you your cheese and pepperoni. But if you want a stuffed crust half-meatlover's half veggie supreme, with anchovies, you're going to be spending a longgggg time workin' that sh*t out.
yay back from vacation to another DALL-E Jazza video, what a pleasant surprise! i think it would've been even better if you had put a split screen of the best DALL-E and fiver images side by side at the end of the prompts to make it easy to compare
You should do a YOU vs DALL-E 2! Make your own illustration based on prompts commented, and then ask DALLE to do their own version! Would "in the style of Jazza" be recognized?
Needs more likess!!!
This would defently be a fun expirament.
He already made a video like this
@@dragonwarriorz1 not quite!
I havenât drawn in an year and seeing all these âartistsâ making no attempt at what they are paid for, even asking for MORE money for their work, and ends of making poor art hurts a lot. It is such a shame that those who are actually good at their work are underselling themselves⊠so glad you gave them a good tip. â€
Comment afterwards by Andrea P:
"A user named Shawn in the comments discovered that the unicorn from that last artwork is from "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll. đ It might have been mashed together by a human, but it nonetheless looks plagiarized to me."
/Hope
Dude, honestly? You've got scammers, AI art posing as their own and maybe one actuall artist (that manga thing). That ancient city and this unicorn looks totally like something Midjourney is producing...
Re: Dall-e and hands
If you prompt it to specifically draw close up hands, it will do that just fine. The issue appears when you tell it to draw full human figures - it doesn't know how to place hands in the context of a posed human. Just look at the astronaut and knight paintings generated - the hands have a basic pose at best and indistinct club shapes at worst.
Renaissance paintings have delicately posed and beautifully painted hands. The 6th astronaut at 5:18 has one set of wonky fingers and one flipper. From that alone, I would say it has failed to meet the style requirements given in the prompt. Come back when you can paint hands like Raphael đ
I don't think that thats really what's happening. AIs like Dall-E work by reversing the operation of generating a describion for a picture.
Simply put all these AIs work because we learned how to generate prompts based on pictures. The AI tries to draw things until it then can generate a picture that ends up having a matching description to the input.
If an AI would choose a different description than you would for something it will also choose to draw something different.
It's not that it can't draw hands. It's that it wasn't told to draw hands intracately in front of a person. Also the AIs understanding of art styles is superficial at best.
Assuming that it will draw detailed hands due to renessaince is a bold assumption.
There are some really blatant flaws in the AI though.
If you try the prompt "Cat with 8 legs" in DaLL-E, Dall-E 2 and Imagen they will most likely just generate a normal cat since they cannot really count.
Parti fixes that issue though.
I am 90% sure that the "good" fiverr paintings at 3:50 and at 10:50 were also AI produced, or photobashed at the very least.
The one at 10:50 seems like a mismatch between buyer and seller. My understanding of their listing was that they would take a photo that you had and turn it into that. I assume, based on the prompt, they didnât have a photo so the artist chose to find their own.
Thereâs no knowing for sure if they had the rights to the images they used, but thatâs also means that there is a possibility they did.
The first one was most certainly created with Dream by WOMBO.
10:50 might well be Midjourney
@@penguinfromantartica Dream by WOMBO is not that detailed and does not have a landscape feature, but it could most certainly be made by midjourney.
fiverr needs a feature where the stuff that they make automatically appears on their profile, in this case it would show their trashy work dlso people wont fall for it
It a actually does. My gigs show all my past work
@@notsew008 It doesnt do it automatically. Buyers can put the work with their review after an order, but if you send your work through a ZIP the buyer just can't put it in their reviews at all.
My gig show most of my past work for clients on fiverr. Of course if the client allow for it to show when they accept my request. It also shows the comments from buyer.
And show legit artists.
Then some people could order shitty things just to ruin other accounts
âWhat artists should be worried about is the thieves of humans!â Well yeah, we have been ranting about that for years on end, but AI hardly seems different. A scammer will badly throw together images that donât belong to them and pass it off as their own while AI⊠does that too.
You can think of AI what you want, but a scammer badly throwing images together is not what AI does. The scammers take the existing images, maybe photoshop them a bit. The AI is more like if you would show someone a lot of images by an artist and then say: now make something that looks like it's done by that artist. Only that the AI got shown many artists and photos etc. It learned from images, but it's not doing copy/paste like those scammers. You may not like AI, but still it is working different.
@@gordonbrinkmann Thatâs not true. There have been many incidences of AI blatantly spitting out images very close if not spot on pre-existing images within their dataset. The AI doesnât work at all like a human does. There have been incidences where prompters try and avoid the AI directly copying someoneâs existing art or IP and it did anyways.
Thank you for tipping the beautifully done unicorn on the rainbow. It was stunning.
You really should dispute those as fraud. Dont let them get away with their scamming.
The audacity to steal a comment about theft
Almost all of them besides the furby one was fake even the last one with the unicorn was fake, the unicorn was talen from PosterLounge by typing in Spanish white horse you'll get the same horse. Also the background is most likely an AI drawing with a filter added on top.
I love how all the 'oil painting' gigs were just people putting on the oil painting filter onto terribly photoshoped, or poorly drawn artworks lol
Also 192 dollars digital painting is literally AI generated.
...oh and the last unicorn one seems to be AI aswell... holy shit
Righ? The $192 city and the unicorn absolutely have that AI look. And you can see on the page of the unicorn guy that all his other examples also look fake. Like you said, most of them look like they applied an "oil painting" filter, especially where you can see that the clients' faces are just photoshopped onto existing oil paintings.
A user named Shawn in the comments discovered that the unicorn from that last artwork is from "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll. đ It might have been mashed together by a human, but it nonetheless looks plagiarized to me.
@@AndreaP_N7 Holy shit it is. That's gross.
Bro that guy you gave the big tip too also stole the art. Sorry to say :( Look up Spanish White Horse print by Julia Moll. What was also a give away to me (An actual Artist) is the Horse itself has NONE of the strokes compared to the rest of the piece. None of the same style or flow whatsoever.
Good eye, that is a very good catch. It appears it might be photobashing with a img filter. Still i suppose for 85$ assuming even just 1-4 hrs of work photobashing to get things together, it's not the 'worst' rip. But i'd definitely be dissapointed if i thought i was painting for the quality experience. Yet that stuff by handpainted quality reaching 150-300 alone wouldn't be unheard of.
I dont know if you did it on purpose or not but someone like you who is so well versed in the digital art sphere would know not to commission fiverr artists who ask a lot and have no reviews.
11:26 As Ex-Photoshop artist i might say, it's a "cheap work" why ? There is three things A: Background obliviously a part of real painting, existed before i recognize that painting style, it is NOT artist work. B: Unicorn are, a UNicorn took from some wedding picture colladge, again NOT artist work. C: Rainbow MIGHT be done by artist... But i am doubtful.
In conclusion only real work a "Furby Spider With Human Legs Over Tokyo in style of Jinji Ito" what one is 100% original.
Same! It is either photoshopped from different images, or straight up AI produced I think.
Apparently someone in the comments named Shawn figured out that the horse from that picture is from "Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll.
i think the 84 dollars one you like looks a lot like a midjourney AI image
1:30 I can imagine âmysterious hieroglyphâ on the vase
What the hell- I canât believe that many âartistsâ were just ripping off bad stock photos, thatâs so sad :c We really need to be supporting these real hard working artists. This is just really upsetting.
Is this the end for artists? Nah, it sounds more like the Golden Age for artists who make weird stuff based on other peoples' ideas. Now these _unnamed artists_ have a limitless supply of AI generated prompts. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal to me.
AI sculptures on dolle plz.
This is gonna blow up
yeah ai is literally the future of art.. someone who cant come up with concepts properly now has a tool at their finger tips to be able to put a couple words down and then get a concept generated for them...
@@TimeMasterOG I'm been using these tools for several months now to stimulate the imagination. I'm actually having dreams again and able to clearly imagine better and create better prompts to get better results that I can expand upon to transform it. It's such a breath of fresher air.
Sure, you say that until the AI starts sculpting
Tha sad thing is that the people scamming on fiverr now, will start using AI, and actually get pretty good results..
I mean, if you pay fiverr for digital image of a unicorn, and the seller does deliver a magnificent digital illustration of a unicorn, it's not scamming.
â@@prosk8er1995 by stealing them off Google images?
The furby one from driopeproject is just insanely good
I new fiverr had some scammers here and there but this is absolutely wild. I hope these people get removed from the platform. As for the AI, it did insanely well with the prompts provided
Fiverr is not a good website, imo. Too much competition. Plenty of good artists sell their art for basically nothing, and it's honestly a bit unfair.
Then you see the kind of "artists" in this video...
@@empty-voiid Agreed. I got a manga styled drawing of a couple NPC's in a campaign for ÂŁ34 and it more then delivered on what I needed. So there are definitely artists out there that are more then capable of delivering who under appeariate the value of their own work. So much so I felt obligated to hand out a hefty tip.
That being said; they definitely should've been more selective on the artists selected. A lot of them weren't even rated! You can't throw that amount of money at untested "talent."
I'm pretty active on Deviantart for years and I now find more and more images created by AIs on there. The interesting part of this is:
you still recognize that it's made by an AI whether or not the uploader gave the program credit. There's always something uncanny and oddly surrealistic about it that can't be produced by humans because (I recon) we are too influenced by reality.
I don't know how far the AIs are going to evolve and change the quality and overall looks to more match the expectations and skills of these of humans. But I see your point when you say you get more detailed results from humans based on the commission, not only because we understand the unwritten meaning behind the words and can communicate with each other on a whole other level, but we can actually discuss details and ideas, while the AI can only spit out variations that it thinks might fit your expectations - and they are mostly very similar from what I've seen in this video.
For as long as AIs can't communicate as metaphorically as we do, with the ability to discuss details the way we do, I believe the need for human artists will not seize to exist.
@Norma Neumann Most "art" that has been thrown out there by humans is plain boring and they even make money with it! So what's the difference?
I'm pretty impressed by some images I saw made with Midjourney AI, regarding composition, art-style and colour-scheme as well as atmosphere.
The images in this here video aren't as impressive compared to Midjourney.
But then again, Every artist has it's own style. The AI might learn what style speaks to it's audience the most and uses it more often.
@@MoonshineTora Yeah MJ has been having people rate previously generated images and when they recently released v3, they incorporated that into the model. So that kind of feedback loop is already starting to happen.
you can recognize them becuz the ai takes art from a web search and trace it basicly... so you can recognize that it was made by a programm and not an art of actula person
we are in year 3 of proper AI art. in 10 years there is no doubt it will eclipse basically any modern digital artist.
I do have some inputs that you can put in DALLE 2.
. Sinister villain from a cute Saturday morning cartoon
. An alien playing a bass guitar in a spaceship
. Unicorn wearing a loose robe enjoying some coffee and a muffin
. Frida Kahlo meeting her past self
. A geisha in the style of Studio Ghibli
. Emotional vent artwork
. Something youâd see in your dreams or nightmares
. A stock image of a plumber being stuck in a toilet
. Psychedelic SpongeBob SquarePants
. A gangsta raccoon spray painting graffiti on a brick wall
. A liminal space mirror maze
. Snow, Rain, Summer, And Spring combined into one new season
. A new holiday thatâs unusual but fun
. Daft Punkâs final tour
. A crazy CZcams thumbnail
. A painting of a king holding a bowling ball and smoking a cigar
. A mascot for a company that specializes in art and animation
. An African tribal mask thatâs colorful and has glitter
. A Disney and Pixar movie scene that involves a bunch of dogs having a tea party
. Joe Biden in a commercial for McDonaldâs
. CZcams Rewind The Anime
. An old gypsy woman gazing upon her crystal ball
. A wizard live streaming his magic on Twitch
. The next generation game console
. A new video game mascot for Nintendo
. Impractical Jokers celebrating Halloween
. A brand new emoji
. A nice pair of squishy shiny toy balls
. A floating casino in the sky with slot machines and coins
. Super Mario in a dress and wearing makeup
. A female Grand Theft Auto protagonist
. A Netflix movie poster
. An aesthetically pleasing museum
. Creepy hallucination
. A photograph of a dinosaur wearing a top hat and a monocle
. Sleep paralysis demon
. A world set in Virtual Reality
. A reggae Rastafarian jellyfish
. The Wizard Of Oz meets Alice In Wonderland
. A man entering an enchanted cave thatâs a portal to another dimension
. Utopian Candyland with pastel colors
. A cat entering The Matrix
. A mascot for a company that involves scented lotions and shiny lubricants
. Amy Schumer hosting an event at Anthrocon
. Storybook illustration of a gingerbread princess
. A digital drawing of a demon and other creatures tap dancing in lederhosenâs and frauleinâs on Broadway
. A childrenâs drawing of Melanie Martinez
. Lego Video Game leaked concept art
. Cute CGI ghost playing VR
. The Boyfriend from Friday Night Funkin having a rap battle with Parappa The Rapper
. The universe in a jar
. CZcamsr video thumbnail
. Funny greeting card
. Kung Fu Panda but itâs made by Disney
. Adorable plush toy baking a delicious cake
. A pair of intergalactic high heeled shoes
. Dark purple gothic church
. Jaiden Animations and Theodd1sout salsa dancing while famous artists are watching
. A golden Apple in an empty room
. Randy Couture in Dragon Ball
. Pewdiepie cosplaying in a pink nurse outfit and a cyan colored wig posing with a toy syringe
. The Legend Of Zelda by Vincent Van Gogh
. Kim Kardashian slimed at the Kidâs Choice Awards
. Tom And Jerry standing behind a burning building
. A luxurious treehouse
. 3D video game landscape
. Elvis Presley but heâs an anthropomorphic furry rabbit
. A donkey wearing a sombrero eating tacos and drinking a mojito
. A conga line that features video game characters
. A claymation shot of a drag queen singing at The Super Bowl
. John Cena in Jojoâs Bizarre Adventure
. A werewolf getting a manicure
. Jerma swimming in a giant cup of Starbucks coffee
. A new Nintendo video game character
Or if you wanna give it a bit of verity then create some artwork and see what the different variations are.
The possibilities are unless!
4:27 Close but I think a better guess would be David Bowie (note the mismatched pupil size and other features)
I just recently used Fiverr to commission a tattoo artist to make a custom design for me, and he was absolutely amazing. Iâve done the back log searches to make sure it wasnât copyrighted, and there is nothing on the internet even close to what he had designed for me. I believe I just lucked out on my first try. Iâve been working with the same artist on building my full sleeve.
Im sad that there are people out there that are scammers. Because then you come across a really great original artist and they donât charge nearly as much as I think they should for the quality they give.
I hope this can only get better.
As a commercial illustrator of 30 years, I think AI is certainly going to be disruptive. It seems to be improving at a breakneck pace. Just a few months ago this stuff wasn't nearly as good. In advertising I have no doubt they will adopt this technology. For the last 30 years ad agencies have pushed tighter deadlines, lower budgets, and unlimited revisions. With rising costs of subscription software and so many programs you need as a professional to complete the job, it's definitely an undervalued occupation. I read an interview with an old commercial illustrator (I think it was one of the hildebrandt brothers) and he said back in his day one good ad agency job would buy you a new house. Now your lucky if it buys you a new video card.
The rising cost of subscription services are because they are getting more valuable. You're able to do more and make more off of them than you've ever been able to before. The competition is just bigger and you need to keep up.
One good ad agency job could buy you a new house... if you were one of the Brothers Hildebrandt. Also, you should consider that the Bros. Hildebrandt didn't have Wacom, or touch-sensitive digital styluses. (Styli?) Anyway, they worked in paints and mediums that were toxic, and took hours or days for a layer of paint to dry before they could continue their work. Some of them were lucky (and successful) enough to be able to afford models, but those who didn't had to learn and be inspired without the help of the internet. Digital painting has not replaced actual ink and paint, nor will AI replace you. But it might be wise to start learning to understand and use it as a tool now, while it's new.
@@TunaIRL that's just a feature creep.
I love that this is mostly a video shitting on Fiverr lmao
9:26 basically what ai art industries are doing
Technically, the AI is using the same 'steal artwork' toolset as the "artists". Only its much better at it, and much better at combining multiple stuff (point raised in replies, all artists use references, so the AI is acting similarly to proper artists in that sense)
All artists combine multiple images to create something if they're working in any sort of realism or realistic anatomy. No one can draw a perfectly realistic tiger from memory, for example. There's nothing wrong with taking reference from other artists, the issue comes from LITERALLY photoshopping the exact stock image into your art
No, because the "artists" literally stole assets, full assets. The AI is just using inspiration.
@@zohabaig6426 also, "from memory" would still be drawing off previous images/experiences of tigers, so even completely from memory would still be from prior art.
@@zohabaig6426 Fair point
the fact that anyone would even go to fiverr knowing just how bad it is for actual artists due to the 'race to the bottom' mentality still boggles my mind
I wish you'd commission actual professional artists you can find on artstation or twitter or reddit or something, instead of wasting money on random scammers on freakin fiverr. Yes it would be a lot more expensive, but you could actually see the massive difference between AI and an actual professional artist.
Sadly those sites have scammers and thieves on them too, it's just something that we have to be cautious of. I think the people putting this video together could have done maybe a bit of a better job at vetting the artists, and I hope they reported the account as it's so fraudulent đ
ÂĄThis^
If you ask me, It doesn't matter if a robot does it better but what truly impresses the person isn't how good the work is, but the idea that someone managed to make it
It always blows my mind when I see an artwork that I actually like and isnt from a robot, because someone was capable to make it and spent actual time thinking of how they wanted it to look
In a way, AI art is a wake up call to artists, not to make them feel bad but to feel challenged to learn and make even better art, because if you make something stunning yourself then people will still be in awe
this is the most human biased perspective ever, you are a racist against AI & robots
That's not really the point here. If you're talking about art as a hobby then sure, but the issue is that ai is threatening to replace artists in thr workfield.
Why would a company or client hire expensive people for their hard work and livelihood when a robot can do the same in 1/100th of the time and money it takes too
Thats the thing, there's no such thing as "better art" or "worst art", art it's just different, and just because an AI generated digital-painting looking pretty pictures that looks nice for a non artist it's doesnt mean it's "better". Besides AI have a lot of errors, in perpective, composition, coloring, HANDS, etc. And if you don't have the knowledge of all that you won't be able to fix them, thats why you LEARN art, being an artist it's not just about doing something but actually knowing what you're doing. But with AI you don't know about the process, you just have someone who does it for you.
The problem with "prompt engineers", what if the customer does not like the end result/thinks you did the prompt badly?, I mean, typing keywords into a prompt isn't really a skill, artists already do that to maximize viewership on art websites with tags. What if your customer just decides to go to your AI website and type a prompt, and ends up liking the result more + not having to pay you?
I just don't understand how "prompt engineers" think they have a real thing going on, AI is not free. It is being funded as an investment by billionaires. Likely for other ventures not related to art itself but art is just their side-thing since it commercially has no real use. AI is not cheap either, your prompts are being processed by servers worth more than your entire life, consuming exorbitant amounts of electricity. Trust me, when/if they decide to stop giving you beta access to their service, you will NOT be able to afford entering 50 different prompts to get a good image result, and by that point, it would make more sense to just pay an artist.
Going back to the fiverr artist ripping images straight from google, I think a huge benefit of AI, is concept creation! You may have a idea in your head and can get a good concept from AI without copyright and go from there. That is what I have been using it for. But also after seeing what you paid for on fiverr.....I think I should start one to help balance the human vs ai side haha. Great video
8:35 Please tell me you got a refund for this
7:26 this is perfect as a comparison. To AI skewed stuff like non human interpretation aka less creative works, AI is better, like nearly every single time. But highly creative and unique stuff, human artists blow it out of the fucking park
This exact type of fraud happened to me as well. I ordered a logo and was given a trace of the first google image result for my request. I even gave them a drawing they could use as reference, but they ignored it. I asked them to redo it and they barely did anything. I hate to say it but I don't see myself using Fiverr in the future, especially when I would be better of doing things on my own. Its sad that this is the norm, and that they can get away with it as they do.
Did this too, once. We wanted a isometric map of the country our company is working in, having some cities zoomed out (if remembered correctly) and their some logos of our customers etc. The artist just copied a flat map from wikipedia, used the pixelated logos she could find on google images and misspelled lots of names. Never again!
This video has done more to hurt my impression of Fivrr artists than anything and that's a shame. The few people who delivered original art had some incredible work at least, especially that last one.
If you mean the last unicorn on a rainbow that's probably fake too sadly..."Spanish white horse" by Julia Moll is the exact horse...
It's stolen art my dude. The horse isn't his.
It's more a problem with Jazza than Fivrr. Avoiding scammers is pretty easy, and even if you do get scammed, you just refuse to accept the work and get your money back.
Sorry about that, but I'm a little disappointed. All the artists who did poorly have no rating shown, while the good ones have a five star rating. This somehow makes the whole video a little unbelievable. It seems to me as if especially bad or for plagiarism known artists were selected.
I'd say this is quite a honest video. You can't always find what you want from a highly-reviewed artist. As a buyer, it's pretty common to have to step into the 0-review territory to get the job done. This is why Fiverr offers so many protections for the customer with the option of issuing a refund.
I would say they found artists for a specific "style" and highly reviewed artists also could be quite busy, so he had to resort to 0 review scammers. Also, people in the comments have suspected and even confirmed that even the high rated artists used an AI to generate their art or use photoshop.
If this was their only fiver video I might think that but they've done a bunch of videos with fiver and this is the only time it's been this bad.
They wanted to show that humans weren't in danger and just go really unlucky.
I have been developing a game and used art breeder to create unique character portraits, then used face generation in daz3d to turn them into unique 3d character with next to no 3d skills. Now add face puppet and I'll get them talking and animated realistically.
There are star ratings on the artist pages for a reason...I've never used that website and it's still that obvious that you can expect dubious quality from the one that doesn't have any rating shown.
I will also say, as an artist myself, I have always been pretty annoyed with how so many artists seem to undersell their work. And the thing is, I don't think they realize how much they are hurting other artists by doing that because it leads to people undervaluing that work. So then customers expect it to be cheaper than it's actually worth, and you get them telling other artists their prices are too expensive.
It's honestly pretty frustrating. It's why many artists have turned to things like Patreon and just locking their work behind a paywall.
Thieves is a huge problem. My family sells decorative signs on Amazon with our own original designs and so so so many Chinese sellers have stolen our exact designs and posted it isn't funny. And Amazon barely does a thing to help. It's laughable the help they provide. They keep on stealing our stuff and under cutting the price and sell crap quality that has our name on the design still so people think they're getting our stuff. It's maddening
11:14 sure this isn't an ai drawing ? the contrasts are a bit too much, the shapes of the clouds seem to be quite randomly generated being very rough or clean without real logic the background merging all together and there are little residues left here and there as if they were little errors. Moreover the guys charging you only 80$ for this kind of sick piece of art is pretty far fetched in my opinion...
Your videos are consistently so good. Enjoyed this very much.
As a very struggling Fiver artist seeing so many scams on that site while I work for days on a 15 dollar order is crushing.
I feel the same. Working my ass off 12+ hrs a day, working on projects at a low price just to get the first customers in and then there's people like these.. No wonder half the clients I get are very skeptical of paying me a fair wage for work and I'm stuck making a drawn animation worth a weeks work for 40-60 dollars.. :(
For how much trash there is on the platform with scammers (both sellers and buyers trying to scam new artists) without much being done about it Fiverr shouldn't be taking that hefty 20%...
I'm getting my client portfolio together and hopefully will be able to move out of the space and transition elsewhere, keeping fiverr comissions on a low backburner.
Jazza should totally check out the Midjourney AI! the artworks it can make is honestly outstanding.
Yeah, for instance, it almost undoubtedly made the artwork he just tipped $240 to some guy for.
@@Nebulaoblivion I've used Mid journey and a lot of times it doesn't get animals perfect. It takes too many creative liberties. But to your point, those scammers could've used MidJourney and gotten away with it easier.
@@Nebulaoblivion midjourney is horrible at animals (as mentioned), otherwise I'd Beleive it.
@@Nebulaoblivion no you clearly dont use midjourney.
That unicorn is taken directly from a piece called "Spanish White Horse" by Julia Moll. Like 1 to 1.
the thing that people forget the reason why dalle2 is so good is because of the artist it learns/sources from.
You should do a video like this one with a platform called Midjourney. Midjourney is a platform which creates super realistic art based on the prompts you give it
All the BAD plagiarism, at those immense prices is really appalling to me. How is this a thing? This is why I keep away from Fiverr.
They don't get paid until you confirm payment AFTER having received the artwork. (Seller has to confirm that the request is finished, buyer has to confirm the request is what they asked for).
Also, these sorts of things only really happen with new sellers. If you choose rated sellers, you'll be fine, aside from regular disputes that always occur between artist and commissioner.
I constantly see artists with genuinely good skills underpricing their work just to get a commission yet these scammers charge ridiculously high prices for blatant ripoffs. It's disheartening because people tend to gravitate towards artists that charge more, thinking they're going to get better results, and ignore the real artists just because they charge less, even though they do it because they can't get work.
14:43 it's definitely generated by AI coz nobody look this happy while eating the saladđ
If you already have an idea of what the finished image should look like, AI will disappoint you. If you just need ideas, AI can be a great tool for getting concept art or thumbnails.
This is one of the reasons Iâm scared to do anything online involving sharing my art ! As much as I really want to Iâm just so wary of people stealing and profiting off my work! And Iâm trying to figure out how to start using my art as a income and this makes it really hard
I think you have to accept the possibility that someone is going to profit somehow on your work if you ever want to show, share, sell or create anything. Mozart isn't alive anymore and see how many are creating profit from his work now even unpublished ones.
@@piexactlyequalsthree yea I know itâs just annoying to think of .. like it seriously annoys me seeing it happen to strangers so I guess itâs really really going to annoy me when itâs possibly me itâs happening to ! Although Its just one of the reasons because the main reason Iâm having trouble is because my add brain gets super confused and to many different tracks /ideas I find it CRAZY hard to focus on one and it just takes me forever to end up making a decision ! Itâs soooo hard trying to follow through on a long term project when your like that ! That and I definitely doubt myself on a constant basis so yea Iâm hopeless đ©đ
Here is a tip, the only social media that will need to get real money for your art are Linkedin and Behance (if you want to work with games Artstation too) and a site with your portfolio, and these ones being so professional with many copyrighted material I don't think AIs will start stealing too soon from them, after making your site start sending emails to companies that you think your art style works.
Another tip is going to a place with multiple stores and start taking notes of the companies you find what will work with your style.
@@pinki8888 I understand it's hard to focus with all that ideas and creativity. It's annoying for sure to think of people who take your work and use it. :) I think they'll have a constant stress to coverup when they blatantly steal. :)
I hope you keep doing what you enjoy most. A lot of artists are sad about the fact that they have to create for the market not for their own joy and happiness. :) If your work has been worth stealing it's maybe something to be proud of. Still annoying and hurtful for sure especially when you see your hard work get ripped off.
Here is my take on A.I Artwork. I was in a creative block for a massive long time ever since my class ended. I gave Midijourney a try to test the A.I for references. It honestly got me back into the groove of painting n making art again using the abstract art it gave me as inspiration. I can see these tools being super helpful when it comes to creative workflows more than taking over and help speed up process on whatever projects people might be working on n with. That is my personal experience n take of A.I assistants as I see them. :)
Maybe. But as a working artist (drawing and painting) your future is gonna get pretty bleak. This stuff is improving at a astounding rate. Don;t spend the next five years learnign to draw. Spend that time learning to utilize all these apps into a functional workflow for speed and effeciency. But you have bigger issues...
Add to this monster the idea of CRISPR babies and the enormous benefits it will have - but not for you. In a couple of generations human beings as we know them will be a thing of the past. If you can cost-effectively genetically modify humans to be smarter, faster, more beautiful then we are redundant. It's weird, almost every tech development , from self driving cars, boston dynamic's robots, midjourney AI, 3D printing etc is replacing physical labour. It's like man's answer to the Garden of Eden. We don't need God to go back there. We can counter "in the sweat of your brow" with and machine server power. The writing is on the wall. I mean, when you have silicon valley intrepreneurs waving normal human beings as a burden and glorifying a "new designed haminity" then we are pretty much damned.
u sound like a commercial đ€Ł
@@snaphaan5049 Fucking well written.
It is worrying to read how ignorant people are in this thread.
Im glad I found your comment.
There is still hope!âđœ
Yeah it's the same with code generation AIs. Basically smart Google
@@snaphaan5049 That's one nihilistic idea of the future.
_OR_ ... all that tech will eventually make capitalism irrelevant, and humans can stop trying to turn every idea into a side-gig or cash cow, or slaving in the corporate mines, and instead follow their dreams and passions, like painting, or sculpting, or making music. The advancements in medical technology will extend those happy lives, and reduce the instinctual urge to breed like rats. Hard work will be something we do because we enjoy the use of our healthier bodies. Imagination can deliver either world, or something in between.
Great video! I agree it's going to hurt the stock image industry. Man I wish Dall-e was around when I was in college a few years ago doing presentations. I spent a crazy amount of time trying to find just the right royalty-free stock photo for the point I was trying to make in a presentation.
I also think it's going to gobbled up a lot of the low-hanging fruit commissions for freelance artists. This is definitely going to put the hurt on amateur and intermediate artists trying to make a living in their craft while improving their skills.
The the rip-offs the Fiverr "artists" were committing were horribly hilarious. The question is what's to stop these dubious entrepreneurs from using Dall-e for commissions they are given? I can't help but think this is already happening. Now that Dall-e is available to everyone I would be hesitant to give a stranger $200 to create an art piece for me. How do I verify the work they do originates mostly from themselves and not an AI? Is there code in Dall-e images that is impossible to remove? What about screenshots of Dall-e images? Maybe some form of steganography? I suppose the best practical solution is to demand WIP images.
Gareth's editing at 2:09 is everything. :)
I'm... definitely feeling discouraged in pursuing art.
Thatâs why I only do art out of the love of doing it. Thereâs always a bigger fish. Now that giant fish is AI. All the artist can do is improve and keep on if they really love doing it.
And let this thought reassure you:
Without artists, there would be no Dalle. There would be no progression in it if all artists stop posting. WE ARE Dalle.
to be fair if AI overtakes an artists career it will slowly take over other careers. In the end nothing will be really left for us regular humans.
Edit: Just wanted to add it might not be so dark for us. For example puzzles these days are mostly cut with a machine so they can of course sell more of them. There is this one puzzle company though that makes hand cut one of a kind puzzles and one puzzle costs $2 000 ! Granted they are an established brand but y'know, there will always be people who appreciate the craft and will be willing to pay more for it.
As someone else said you do have to be doing it mainly for your own enjoyment and interest and wanting to create and improve but I wouldn't let some AI bot put you off. A lot of the time people are paying for your artistic talent and recognise the skill and that's what they look for. I've done pet portraits as commissions before, I am open about using a photograph for reference and I work in a fairly high level of realism. People can frame the photo or even just look at their pet if they want but they don't because they like that it's done by a person đ. Personally I find so much more value in art when I can see the effort put in. It doesn't have to be super complicated or amazing, but drawing is so fun for me that I'd be much more drawn to others pursuing that same feeling than walking around a gallery of computer generated images. They're cool to look at and impressive from an AI perspective but definitely more soulless.
Peiple before me are kind of right. Learning the basics of drawing will help you in anything creative you want to pursue further in time. AI still has a hard time with 3d, animation, movies and a lot more. You can also try glass, ceramics, scene design... every time I get discouraged I look up some philosophy about aesthetics. People have had questions and hardships with art for centuries. Good luck
Pursue it for the fun of it. For the pleasure of doing a good job for a project of your own.
Conclusion: artist who actually work hard will be just fine with AI being around
Nope, I'm not :D I decided to get into 3d, seing ai has harder time with it, and hopefully after few years the trend will be more or less the same. There are very few jobs out there for 2d artists.
@@eatplastic9133 Hate to break it to you but it's been pretty useful for 3D artists for years now as well. AI will likely progress faster in the 3D space than the 2D space, not that we're being replaced anyways, I just find it entertaining you think 3D is safe when it's more susceptible lol
Lol. AI will make art better than you in seconds. It's over.
@@qd0t471 well that going to happen at the end for sure not just for art but for everything , it comes down to what the other side wants and if they would appreciate the work and emotion put by a real human in it .
@@dragonwarriorz1 it sure will I'm no we're near a good artist , I'm just saying that this is just one side of the argument .
As a musician, I have hired Fiverr artists to contribute. Sometimes they would do an amazing solo (2 takes!) for 15$ and other times I paid for drums that were greatly lacking for more money. I've had album art for cheap and also hired a vocalist that absolutely stunning for 30$ Quality and price is a crapshoot, but generally I do my research and work with the same artists that impress me. I find it to be worth it most times if you don't over pay because more money does not equal higher quality. Stay in the 30$ range and you're good.
You should also try out Midjourney, it creates a lot more "artsy" end results, and usually does better with more abstract prompts. You also have a lot more customizability in Midjourney
Mystic Vase - 4bu
Artifact
Whenever an artifact leaves the battlefield, draw a card and put a ruin counter on Mystic Vase.
[tap] [3][b][u] : sacrifice Mystic Vase, you gain an emblem with "all creatures have decay and are artifact creatures."
Such a quality video as always Jazza! Thank you for being kind & seeing the value in others art. I respect & commend you for tipping the artist that truly took the time & effort where others didnât.
I would love to see more of these videos, amazing as always Jazza! Maybe where you recreate the prompt in your style & interpretation before searching on Dall-e, then offer the Dall-e version & the Fiverr version. Would make for a hell of a videođ
"Because humans can always produce something much more specific than AI can" - I wish that statement will prove to be true, but I doubt it.
AI is still in a development phase and it's rapidly developing. They will become much better at understanding more complex tasks and producing even more convincing artwork.
With already existing technology like ChatGPT you will be able to (it's already possible to some degree) work iteratively on projects. You will give the AI instructions on how you want the picture, it will generate 10 or so which will be even better than they already are, you can select your favorite and change certain features through a chat or spoken language, like "make the atmosphere a little bit brighter", "change his posture and his facial expression" etc.
I guess we will reach that point in less than 5 years and while I don't think it will effect artist, who sell their physical art in gallerys, too much, because their customers want original, handmade art, I think it will effect digital artists drastically. Companys, people searching for a book cover, game developers etc will just use AI to generate the art they have in mind for a fraction of the price in an instant and at that point there won't be any difference in quality. Only a small amount of (digital) artist will be able to do it for a living but just as operators for AI because they know about technical stuff like composition and are therefor better at directing the AI.