You Can't Get A Concealed Carry Permit ANYMORE Because Of...
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- ▶[GIVEAWAY] Enter To Win Here: bit.ly/43yNj4n ◀
This video is for educational purposes.
-------------------
Already a Member? You could be earning BIG rewards!
-------------------
Invite a new member to join the USCCA and you will get a FREE $200 USCCA store credit* when they join. Easily invite friends to join from your secure member account OR send them this link ► bit.ly/3HCYGgU
*USCCA referral program credits can only be used at the USCCA.com Store, to be redeemed for up to $200 in USCCA products. Referral credits have no cash value. Terms and conditions apply.
If we used the moral character with politicians, we would have very few left in office !!!
With the drugs prostitution alcohol and insider trading and much more behind closed doors if the truth and honesty were injected into the system it would instantly collapse 🤣
My question is as a retired law enforcement officer, is why would the military and law enforcement enforce unconstitutional laws? If anything these treasonous so called “law makers” should be the ones who are arrested and convicted of treason!!!!
@@svbarryduckworth628 then you are already on the right track!
@@chosenwon5618 if you were a cop you’d know you enforce what the laws are it’s part of your job
@@svbarryduckworth628 🤣 Foxtrot Echo Delta comes to mind
As a LEO, you should know that it is very unlikely to arrest a LEO or lawmaker for passing unconstitutional laws.
What is the 11th Amendment in simple terms quizlet?
11TH AMENDMENT. The 11th Amendment provides that states enjoy sovereign immunity from being sued in federal court for money damages by either the state's own citizens or citizens of other states (Hans v. Louisiana; Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, US v.
Most police enforce unconstitutional laws because they want their paycheck and benefits. Of course they would tell you it’s the courts job to rule what’s constitutional and in turn their job is to enforce those laws.
After carrying legally in El Dorado county for 8 years, I moved to Sacramento and was denied a permit because my vehicle was broken into and my firearm was stolen 2.5 years prior (and recovered 2 months later). Sac county said automatic denial for 5 years. I appealed saying I was not a resident of Sac county, nor did the crime occur in Sac county and my county has no issue with me. Denied again. Fortunately I am planning on leaving California shortly
Absolutely insane that you can be denied a carry permit for being the victim of a crime.
@@Anon54387 Best move ever. Run Forrest Run.
California protecting the criminals.
That's crazy that they punish the victim of a crime! That's great that you're in a position to be able to leave the state. All anyone can do is welcome you to wherever you end up... but also ask you not to bring any of CA's way of thinking & voting to your destination state. Be safe out there!
Why would you move to California in the first place, especially Northern California
Edit: I think I had a stroke while first typing this.
I fixed it.
Requiring a license to keep and bear arms is the same as a poll tax, or Jim Crow. A right delayed is a right denied.
No it's like HAVING A LICENCE TO DRIVE A REGISTERED CAR !!.....
Licence to carry a registered firearm !
NO DIFFERENT !
OR
Is that unconstitutional as well ??
Are road rules unconstitutional ?
Speed limits are a "RESTRICTION OF YOUR RIGHTS !" They must be unconstitutional !!
STUPIDITY....... Or is that next ?
@@Marc_Remillard The 2A is a right given to us by God and protected in our constitution. A car is a privilege and guns are a right. You need more education.
Edit: stupid auto correct.
@@Marc_Remillard Exactly where in the Constitution does it say anything about Driving? Correct, it doesn't. That's why driving is considered a PRIVILEGE and owning and carrying Arms is a RIGHT. Do you need a license to voice your opinion (free speech)?...how about a license to be free from illegal search and seizure?...do you need a license to practice your religion?...is a license needed for your RIGHT to due process...or to go vote? No! You do not need a license for ANY part of the Bill of RIGHTS...which, very much, includes the 2nd Amendment. You really should do some research about the Constitution, Bill of Rights & 2nd Amendment. There is a world of difference between being able to drive a car and being able to keep and bear arms.
It is just another registration that directs them STRAIGHT to YOU
The Constitution means what 5 justices of the Supreme Court say it means. So states can require permits to carry. I like the permit requirement because people should have to get training and a background check. I don't want wackos and vigilantes packing or people that don't know gun safety, gun laws, or de-escalation techniques.
The criminals don’t have a license to carry a firearm, but they do..law abiding citizens don’t want to get in trouble for carrying a firearm.. so they have to get a license to carry, but criminals just don’t care about that..there’s something wrong about that..
Criminals at the top
What I don’t understand is since it is our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms and since this right shall not be infringed why are they infringing on our rights? We are law abiding citizens why are they allowed to judge us because of what the unlawful people do? Why are they allowed to infringe on our rights?!! Why is this not stopped?
Decades of left wing activist judges placed on the Supreme Court by Democrat presidents and Senators.
That's just it - they gave you those constitutional rights & they can take away what they gave
you. When the early settlers came here, this is what they escaped....pagan laws, and all they
brought with them were GOD'S LAWS & their faith-based system. They were later followed &
soon those same pagan laws were given to them along with a pagan govt. Those seeking to
gain complete control over all land could not govern under GODS LAWS which are that which
gives us the ultimate FREEDOM to carry. They gave us a right we already had but by man and
therefore they can also take them away.
They gave us our God-given rights to garner trust & now that the time is near for the mission
to be complete, we are witnessing them taking this very important right away that they gave
to us, because they know that they will meet resistance and this is to ensure a more smooth
transition from a free & independent nation to a member state of a global system. None of
this truth was taught because they took control over edu in 1925 but it's all in the archives &
all we have to do is be hungry enough to do the research & it will all make sense. Stay locked
and loaded my friend!! 🙏
Also,govt is dismantling all civil liberties and only one recourse...
Maybe you shouldn't abide unlawfully.
Because they are criminals, not you😊
How can a judge after ruling in favor for a 2A case, Then put a stay on the law knowing its unconstitutional? Just because the state appeals. Isn't that depriving a person from their rights?
They willfully ignore the fact that the word "democracy" is no where to be found in our constitution. Yet... that is all they squawk about.
My guess is Benitez saw DA's prosecuting citizens for Freedom Week magazines. You can win, be found completely innocent, have followed the ruling to a tee, and be financially ruined paying for representation.
Pheng Yang was prosecuted by a DA we thought was a pro-gun conservative. Yes, farm land California is conservative.
@@40SnWfan Then you sue them for wrongful arrest and make them pay your lawyers fee. I can't see why not.
Basically it is simple.... A state can ban concealed carry but they cannot ban open carry... Aymette v State 1840 which is the Historical and tradition on the matter... ""And, as the manner in which they are worn and circumstances under which they are carried indicate to every man the purpose of the wearer, the Legislature may prohibit such manner of wearing as would never be resorted to by persons engaged in the common defense."
I am pro 2A and as long as they do not ban open carry they are not violating your Second Amendment rights at all...
Even these so called "2 A defenders" do not actually do their own research....
In fact, if you want to go into the nitty Gritty of the second Amendment, it doesn't protect your personal rights at all, there is no need to as they are "unaleanable" meaning they cannot be given away nor taken away...
The Second Amendment is in place, as per History and Tradition, as it was understood by the founding fathers of the time of the adoption of the Second Amendment, "If the citizens have these arms in their hands, they are prepared in the best possible manner to repel any encroachments upon their rights by those in authority." Aymette v State 1840... as well as "The object, then, for which the right of keeping and bearing arms is secured is the defense of the public. The free white men may keep arms to
protect the public liberty, to keep in awe those who are in power, and to maintain the supremacy of the laws and the constitution."
Now here is what that same case says about carry....."The words "bear arms," too, have reference to their military use, and were not employed to mean wearing them
about the person as part of the dress."
That is why these groups love to not tell you everything.... The less you know the more money they can make.... Being Honest....
Keep in mind also that this was before the 14th amendment was added....
If they were worth anything, the could do away with the NFA and GCA rather quickly, but they wont as there is no money in it for them....
Unpermitted Constitutional carry should be nationwide! The right to bear arms shall not be infringed!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
That's why ive never filed for a cc permit and never will..
I just carry,.. no one will decide If I can protect me except me.. 🖕🏾unconstitutional laws.
#AlwaysCarry..
Delete this bro don't advertise that. The feds WILL go after you, I agree that you have the god given right, but don't put it out there.
Me too, here in Virginia. We had Governor McAuliffe and he was trying to expand the things that could get your permit suspended. This is a permitless open carry state. I started concealing at will when I got stopped by police. They told me without criminal intent, and an aggravating circumstance it's almost impossible to charge you with misdemeanor carrying a concealed weapon without a permit. Too hard to prove the criminal element without those factors.
@@chrissmith-rv5ro yep, I'm in Louisiana it's open carry here aswell, one quick flip of my shirt tail turns my .38 to oc if cops are involved asking whether I have a weapon or not, but when they leave, my shirt tail returns back to cc and i go on about my day..
👍🏾🇺🇸
@@RONALD...... my exact move.
Ditto
Just received my Oregon CHL after waiting six months from application to approval. And it wasn't cheap. I remember the application having a "good cause" question. My answer was simply "self-defense".
Here in New York State, from what I have heard from L.E.O.s, they don't consider self-defense as a "good cause"!
@@randyherringshaw6325 but since bruen, that is illegal.
They can't ask that question any longer.
My good cause question is it's a constitutionally guaranteed god-given right and I'll take away qualified immunity
@mrohevi252 It didn't stop them from asking it on my CCW permit application! Thanks to Hochul, there is a lot of illegal, Unconstitutional BS going on right now in New York State!!! I would love to know when the Supreme Court is going to issue arrest warrants for every last Unconstitutional government employee!!!
@@mrohevi252 no but you have to turn over all your social media for the last three years and an officer of the state will determine if you have "good morale character" So yes, you don't have to show proper cause, but you better have not said anything that the officer might find offensive or "dangerous"
This is the problem with permits, all 50 states should be permitless carry
what! you mean you actually think you should be able to defend yourself against incoming cartels, amazing.
My question is… how would they know you’re concealing a firearm in a bag or something? Especially without a warrant or probable cause?
If good moral character is the standard, I would say that any cop who abused a civilian should not be allowed to carry a gun. Their jobs are literally to uphold the constitution. If they don't carry out those duties, that have most certainly no moral character.
I took my CWP class and submitted my application in Arizona in February, and 4 weeks later I had my CWP permit. This permit is accepted in 38 states.
Same with Utah's CCW
Took my CWL (here in WI they call it a License instead of a Permit) and got it within a week. I applied for my USCCA on the same day and got it a day after my CWL. I was very impressed with our State govt
Don't give up the 1st or 2nd united states constitution
Yes sir! .............I will give them something and is not going to be an advice.
The 2ndA keeps the rest of constitution protected
In case we ever fall under a tyrant as a leader we have the right to bear arms to protect our freedoms
Academically WE KNOW...... OBJECTIVELY.....
210 mass shootings in 130 days THIS YEAR ! SO FAR......
38,492 Children killed by gun violence since 2006
8,294 killed between 1985-2005( assault ban period )
It's effen obvious !!
So are you "pro mass killer" ?
do you WANT IT THIS WAY ?
Do You want kids killed in schools by psychos who COULDNT GET GUNS UNTIL YALL CHANGED THE LAWS ?.....
Academicaly speaking......
I was born and raised in Fresno California. For several years I had a CCW permit issued by the Sheriff there. He was pretty good about issuing them.
When I moved to WVa in 1998 I easily transferred my California permit to there.
I know a lot of California counties back then were not so easy. I’m glad to hear that this has changed.
And today you need no permit of any kind in West Virginia.
Attorney made a BIG mistake - it should have been a class action lawsuit, then it would have gone to court.
That California AG needs to be in prison
Good moral character would eliminate 99% of the politicians
And law enforcement personnel.
Law is like a Chess game where engineers get to design the board and the pieces. I knew 100% after Braun liberal states would go on the offensive. I also knew that people who had permits under May issue states would now have new hurdles to deal with. It took about 6-9 months for those states to make every place of carry off limits. Supreme court ruling says under Braun a state must issue a CCW making them go from a May to a Shal issue state. The state can still require so many hours of training I could be wrong but the Supreme court never mentioned hours, cost and location of carry. So what did some May issue states do they raised the cost of permits and made most locations off limits. So now it's back to the courts for round two. The question will be does a business have the right to not allow someone from carrying a firearm even with a permit? Will the courts say any business owner has the right to not allow firearms or will the courts say you cant restrict someone of their second amendment anymore than you can restrict based on skin color, sex, sexual orientation. Another concern is the unintentional creation of soft targets. If the law says unless a sign is posted saying firearms are allowed psychopaths will now know that nobody will be legally carrying. I would also imagine for liability even a pro 2A business would not want to post a sign saying firearms welcome. It used to be don't ask don't advertise.
A conceal carry license is just a way for states to make money on our right to own weapons! The founding fathers saw the need for citizens to possess and own firearms,That stands true today! Not for survival but to fight a tyrannical government! Which is what we have today and currently in Washington!
“Good moral character” makes perfect sense as a requirement for a CCW….. if it means “has not been convicted of a crime of moral turpitude.”
Permits / conceal carry licenses are a conversion of a right into a privilege. You shouldn't have to pay a fee and jump through hoops to own and carry a gun.
I believe that getting a CCW in L.A. County is still the same as it has been for decades. The Sheriff will give out one or two to a few people who aren’t part of the status quo (retired LE, judges and VIPs) to demonstrate that anyone can get a CCW. They’ll continue to delay and deny CCWs to lawful citizen with perfect records because the city and county prefers to have subjects beholden to the government for everything, including their lives and safety.
Not true any more, LA county bith LASD and LAPD now issue CCW's, waiting time for processing is the issue, expect a 1 year minimum processing from application to CCW being issues.
@@DB-cz9uu I'm sorry and it's nothing personal against you. I don't believe your statement is accurate. The status quo of delaying and denying for L.A. County residents is still the same. They may have loosened it a little but they will do anything and everything to delay if not deny. Even if you delay and don't deny, it's basically the same thing. Unless you're a retired LEO, fire dept. employee, judge or a VIP like an anti-gun politician (Feinstein), you will be granted a CCW.
@@egmjag Do you live in LA County? have you applied for a CCW?
@@DB-cz9uu 10 months from application time to the interview for me with LAPD.
@@sneww4282 you must have applied in 2021
Isn't it illegal to enforce an unconstitutional law as it is void and cannot be heard as a cause to arrest?
we need to get rid of these gun free school zones, even states with constitutional carry didn't put in provisions for school zones so you can still go to jail if you carry in one or even if you get pulled over in a school zone you can be charged and serve time in prison for a constitutional right.
Isn't ANY restriction (through a new law) an infringement?
What are we paying the supreme court for?
The four box diner did a video on this. Specifically stating how to fight the DA and prosecutors because they would do it again and again... there is a legal standing on hoe to stop the tyrannical ways when they know they are going to lose and how to stop it from happening over and over.
US supreme Court
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since it's unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment... In legal contemplation it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed... Since an unconstitutional law is void the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it. A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supercede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land (the constitution)it is superceded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."
Bonnet V. Vallier,16 NW. 885,136 Wis. 193(1908); Norton V. Shelby county,118 US 425(1886).
Precedes heller and bruin. All gun control laws are unconstitutional infringements therefore illegal, null and void.
As a student at the Artemis Defense Institute, it's awesome seeing more USCCA videos featuring Steve Lieberman.
When you need it you aren’t gunna worry about a conceal carry during the event
So that's why they don't want us to carry a gun. The "Good Moral Citizen" component is something NO politician can pass. So classic mentality of, "Well, if I can’t do it, then no one else can either."
There is a term for taking a case where it can be mooted on a regular basis that can be used to take on that section. The homework involved is this case as well as FOI all cases that were for this and the results showing that those that have pressed it's un-constitutionality has been used against individuals.
Capable of repetition yet evading review. Standard theory on this argument is that it is about situations that happen too quickly for the courts to act. It is what allowed abortion to get to the SCOTUS in the now overturned Roe v. Wade because court cases take more than the 9 month duration of a pregnancy - to say nothing of the 7-8 months between when a pregnancy is noticed, desired to be terminated, and then brought into court. There are hurdles for getting a case brought on this idea of repetition but evading review where the evasion of review is not because of inherent time periods but because of mootness by agreement of parties. The Supreme Court took some notice of this on the FIRST case they were considering doing their right-to-carry case before the State changed the law. It was either NY or NJ and there was discussion about this topic at that time. But the SCOTUS at that time did permit the appeal to be mooted. If someone could find the SCOTUS order about that case, it may contain useful citations for trying to prevent such tactics in a case like this one. I think it was NJ and then later when the same issues were raised the Bruen case, the prior decision was part of why NY didn't just amend its law to cause mootness of that case. Pretty sure it was in the 2020 or 2021 SCOTUS term that this happened.
Got my license after a 14 day wait. God bless The Constitution of the United States of America
If being of good moral standing was used to exercise any of our other rights it would be laughed out of the court room! You can only vote is you are of good moral character!
2A IS MY GUN PERMIT ... YOUR STILL PLAYING 'THEIR' GAME!
For those living in "may issue" states, here's a Good Cause: "So that I can defend my life so that I may continue to pay taxes." They either grant your carry permit, or they effectively state that it's unimportant to them for you to continue paying taxes.
That would'nt work in New york, they would just arrest you for intent to evade taxes or some other random charge lol
sorry sir, its illegal to die in effort to stop paying taxes. you will be convicted of tax evasion post mortem.
Hahahah😂 I'm dying lol
Free men don't need a permit. A permit IS INFRINGEMENT. One does not ask, nor pay, for what is already theirs.
Show me where in the 2nd. Amendment where it says that a permit is required or needed !!!
This should apply to all arms, but Seattle (yea I know…) still bans fighting knives ;and swords)
I have standing as I am being harmed by that, but no lawyer works for free to sue the City of Seattle
It could, I believe, successfully be argued that knives, swords ect.. are bearable arms and thus protected by the 2nd amendment. In the federalist papers, I believe it was Thomas Payne the calls bearable arms as; “not only firearms, but , the sword, spear axe, and all the terrible implements of the soldier.” Basically if your state can convict you of “armed” assault, robbery, ect.. then the item used as an arm, is and or should be protected by 2nd amendment. Really what it comes down to is the money to fight the case
@@chrisfarr6955
Seattle already agrees that they are arms, but have been applying the two part test, intermediate scrutiny to cases.
If /when I learn how to litigate this, I may go it myself pro se.
As I don’t have much money.
Justice/Injustice isn't cheap. I guess that's the best feature of our legal system... it is 100% pro capitalism, and lawyers should charge as much as possible.
OJ Simpson spent millions for his not guilty verdict. Kyle Rittenhouse spent a fortune for his not guilty as well.
I like the ambulance chaser commercials where the law firm says "Help us get our money for your accident"
Great information. Thanks for spelling it out for our non-legalese minds. Maybe its time for me to apply
THAT'S WHY I DON'T ask ....... Constitution says I CAN so I CAN
If they require you to pay any fee at all for getting a permit, no matter how small the fee is, this is selling you your own constitutional rights and therefore infringment.
I think a small fee for supplies, the card, paper, etc is not too much to ask.
A license is a permit to do something illegal lol
@@donriley5642 It is not about if it is much or what yo or I think. It is about human rights and principles. Once we accept fees to be paid in order for rights to be exercised, the only thing a tyranical government would need to do in order to remove our rights is... just rise the fees beyond what most people can afford.
@@misterstrongerman yea i mean I get the point but this is real world, we have to pay for stuff government involved or not
They should make it smooth for people with no criminal record
Good moral character would be grounds for 95% of politicians being REMOVED OR PREVENTED FROM HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE....As we see daily
So in the great equitable state of California, someone that can afford an attorney will have an advantage over someone that can’t. Why is California perpetuating inequality?
Many if not most licensed healthcare professions in America, such as physicians and nurses, historically had to show good moral character as a licensure requirement. Those laws have been coming off the books for years now, for the same reasons discussed here. I wonder if any California organizations tried to keep the litigation going. There are ways to defeat mootness, but I do not know California law.
Maryland is doing the same thing as California, they are ignoring and bypassing the Bruen decision by mooting it out and allowing certain people at certain times to have a CCW permit. Their goal is to maintain their status as May issue states instead of Shall issue.
Great info. God bless my state; Texas!
It's sad that you CANNOT use protection for you and your family as a justifiable cause for getting a CCW in Calif. To me, the whole scope of carrying is fundamentally for your protection - NOT because you carry large sums of cash, NOT because you are a supervisor in a hiring and firing capacity, NOT because you're a judge in a court system, NOT because you're a celebrity.
For This Reason The Attorney General In This Case Should Be Disbarred... And, Removed From Office... This Is Not "Moral" To Knowingly Manipulate And Violate Peoples Constitutional Rights.
This Is A Infringement On A Constitutional Right... That, "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" 🇺🇸
I live in NY and appreciate this video. I wish USCCA would let me apply for a membership.
A shall issue country? Shall issue what? I'm not a felon so the second amendment of the Constitution is the only permit I need.
Making a decree that you must have social distancing and limit spreading a pandemic, and then throwing maskless a party as the Governor...is not a Good Moral character
If it's a God-given right and protected under the Second Amendment of the Constitution, why do I have to pay the state $40 for a piece of paper that says they gave me permission to keep and bear arms? Then, even if I agree to pay them their thirty pieces of silver, they will demand to know the reason why I wish to exercise this right. If my reason does not meet with their approval they can deny me their permission and take this right from me. It truly seems like an infringement to me. If they can take this away, they can also take away the right to assemble and the right of free speech.
Permits are great, but it keeps your hands tied in several ways for self defense
Ohio a constitutional carry state and Brown County, my residence, a second amendment sanctuary county. You do not have to ask permission in Ohio to protect your life.
Imagine. The government says we have to be of good moral character. The us government is lacking morals completely
The fact that that man while under the influence literally without training... took off in a plane, flew it around for an extended duration, and landed it *ALL* without ATC guidance or a co-pilot supervising... (since takeoffs and landings are notably the hardest aspect) upon landing they should have issued him a provisional pilots license and enrollment in the local flight school free of charge. Then subsequently charged him legally with public endangerment and unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle. I wouldn't even have hit him with a DUI charge because clearly he was in full control of his faculties based off his performance, flying a damned plane is greater than any sobriety test you can give the guy.
Thank you. We fight for our rights everyday.
I applied for a CCW in ventura county July 2022. I've yet to have an interview from the sheriff's department to get my permit.
I would get a lawyer if you can afford to. A right delayed is a right denied.
I would get a constitutional attorney, and I would seek money..lots of it
Why is it, since there is no heirarchy of Rights, that Murdock v Pennsylvania hasn't been cited?
A State may not convert a Right into a privilege and apply a tax or licensing requirement to it.
You have a right to "travel" also.....
But you REGISTER your car !
OBTAINED a LICENCE to drive it !( Proved yourself competent)
IF ONLY GUN LAWS REQUIRED COMPETENCY AS WELL !
And abide by ALL ROAD RESTRICTIONS !.....in your "right to travel"
isn't a SPEED LIMIT a restriction against your rights ?
Is that "unconstitutional" as well ?
@@Marc_Remillard
You have a right to travel. You don't have to have a license to go by horse.
@@Vibe77Guy but the horse has to be "REGISTERED" and branded, and you have to be the REGISTERED owner or you are a HORSE THIEF and can be hung ! ( that law hasn't been changed yet, in some states)
And that's much worse than a speeding fine !
SO
Don't leave out the important bits !
Great story and information.
Good thing Kentucky doesn’t require a permit to concealed carry. It also doesnt require you to register your guns. Go KY!!
Arrest these traders on treason charges for not following our constitutional laws.
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."
S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),
Have you ever been physically within a state or country?
@@robertvondarth1730 a state on paper? The state is a fictional corporation!
I'm in Alameda County in California. The issuing of permits will only happen if you have the proper political connections $$$$$$$$$. Even with the Supreme Court rulings, you won't get a permit.
until there is a time where an armed guard is with me everywhere i go only i can insure my security. when the presupposition in society is all are armed, the criminals are less likely to take advantage, laws didnt stop the guy from hitting me with a pipe while trying to rob me, luckily i was able to take it away, most druggies are running away from things and pick on the weak to fuel their addiction, must suck to live that way. i can only assume he saw my stature and thought easy pickins
@USCCA - A lot of these Laws, Bans, Restrictions could be seen in Violation of Title 18 USC Subsection 241, Violating also the Preamble of the Declaration of Independence, and 2nd Amendment
All firearm restrictions are unconstitutional.
Off the beaten track, if someone comes at you with a car and is driving straight toward you, can you shoot to try and save yourself. Something happened in a parking lot, can you defend yourself with a gun, even if you have no where to hide or seek shelter
So many factors to consider, mainly state laws. But other factors 1: Was it instigated like in road rage or bar fight. 2: Is this person rampaging and intending to hit people or property. 3: Could you have simply moved out of the way. 4: Did you continue to shoot once the vehicle have passed you, just to name a few.
On a second note, trying to shoot someone driving straight at you seems unlikely for a civilian. If they’re too close you’re still gonna get hit because the car ain’t stopping. And if you’re far enough, then you should try and get out the way.
These "what if" questions are often quite nonsensical, as they don't convey the entire situation and don't even ask the right question. The question is not "can you shoot", but rather "do you have to shoot". Get some training to understand the difference and the principles involved in self defense!
So, here is the real question for you, is the situation so grave that you are rather willing to go to jail or go bankrupt over it, than to get seriously injured or die right there? maybe getting out of the way of an oncoming car is way more prudent than to stay there like a statue and draw your firearm? Also, if you shoot through the car and hit an innocent bystander, then you go to jail for manslaughter. Oh, and running away is still better than spending a few hundred thousand Dollars on lawyers in a trial.
I applied for my CCW in San Diego in July of last year. In 2 weeks, I will finally have my 2 year permit.
To be fair, I had to reschedule my "interview" one time and that cost me 6 weeks.
And also to be fair, all the people involved in the process from the county have all be very friendly and just wanted to do their job.
You also can have as many guns on your permit as you want now (used to be a maximum of 3).
The downside is they literally give you a piece of paper along with your permit that lists all the guns that you have on your permit and you have to carry that anytime you have your firearm with you.
3:54 "...application fees that are unreasonable." What's "unreasonable"? How about make the fees the same as state and local poll tax? Isn't it reasonable that the "fee" for exercising one right should be the same as exercising another right?
A women that sleeps around and cheats on her husband is not of “good moral nature” but none of those reasons are just cause to revoke the right to bare arms.
Thank God almighty I do not live in California. You could not pay me enough!! I live in Missouri and have a CCW license for four years now never had a problem buying a firearm never had a problem with any kind of licensing. If you have a clean record there's never a problem! Definitely have to pass a background check as per law but like I said if you're an upstanding citizen not even the slightest problem and that's the way it should be everywhere! Especially with the invasion coming over our borders and crime skyrocketing the way it is! The government will never tell me that I cannot protect my family if I follow the rules correctly! Missouri is the greatest
I got a new permit a month ago. It was all good. Had a cup of coffee and homemade cookies. Got caught up with the Sheriff and the ladies.
None of this would be a problem if states accepted CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY... I wasn't aware that states could pick or choose that parts of the constitution or bill of rights to follow... but here we are with CA, NY, and others just doing their own thing regardless of SCOTUS or anyone else.. and have gone as far as calling SCOTUS "irresponsible" and "wrong".
The irony of Ellis's attorney being named "Flyer" is not lost on me
Rather be judged by 12 then carried by 6 . Remember that folks & felons .
I've had a C.C.L. for serveral years and have renewed it , and my current license is still good for 2 more years , I'm a Veteran and have had training and have owned a weapon since I was 10 years old a single shot 22 bolt action my Dad bought me mail order thru Mongomery Wards, at 10 years old I knew even then the differance between it and a toy . I own that rifle to this day. I don't carry often but still intend to keep my license so I can. After all these years if they want to take my guns. I will oppose their action. This changeing the consitution any time they feel like it makes them in the wrong not me. Will it be the first amendment next and I won't be able to even post this . I just found out lately Washington State along with New York State are the only states in the union that USCCA won't cover ????
I’m in LA county, the sheriffs just approved my application. I’m about to take my live fire class.
What carry permit? This is America. Shall not be infringed.
I got denied with, NO criminal history, and I can’t even get a lawyer to talk to me about filing a case
All these questions about the right to keep and bear arms have been answered since 1791, plain and simple. It's the people who have the recognized right to have and use guns, not the state or federal governments. Where in the 2A does it specify who has the God-given right to the use of arms? Again, it's the people and no other. The 2A comes with no particular instructions for the people's gun rights, but there are restrictions against violations by the government. Nowhere is a state-mandated to demand a CCW permit before our 2A right may be exercised.
Do your reasearch into your state laws. There's a lot of panic surrounding this topic. Stay calm and stay informed everyone.
I would have asked that background investigator who denied the permit, “how many sheriffs deputies do you currently have on the department who have been convicted of drunk driving and why should they still have their ability to carry a firearm?”
I’ve been waiting a full year to receive a phone call to set up a CCW interview, May 2022 to May 2023. I’ve had to tiptoe around social media as to not post anything “immoral”. I’m starting to wonder if it will ever happen.
Don't need a government-issued permit. Read the constitution
See in Wisconsin you can just take a class like a seminar and just listen and talk and get a certificate then apply for the license and pay $40 and get it within a week or 2 depending on how fast they decide to process it and mail it. You aren’t required to do a shooting class. Although I would recommend it for people. No wait times is the way it should be
The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
Miller V. US 230 F. 2d. 486,489.
So what you are really saying is that the AG made a decision to end a case to keep it out of the spotlight so he and the government of the state of California could continue to violate the rights of their citizens.
He should immediately be charged and jailed for intentionally and knowingly denying the rights of the law abiding citizens.
Any person not currently in jail or prison, has the right to keep and bear arms. Nobody has the right to determine whether you are moral enough to defend yourself from criminals or tyranny.
$200 every 2 years for a CCW permit is what NJ charges. This is unreasonable.
good thing i live in Florida and don't need a permit to carry concealed!!!!!!!!!!!
I live in upstate New York. My local Sherriff and pistol permit office said in NYS all Pistol permits are now concealed carry. They would rather have you conceal it. Now this was last year. They are changing things constantly lately making it hard for a person to keep up on the laws. I have my permit and do not always carry. I carry if I am going target shooting or in a rough area where it could be needed. I try to stay away from those type areas. lol
Agree that California has a number of rules that make getting CCW extremely difficult and expensive.
What could be more objective than bribing the sheriff? That's the typical criteria in CA.
EVERYONE IN AMERICA SHOULD ALREADY KNOW THAT THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS A REAL GUN PERMIT FOR ALL LAW ABIDING AMERICAN CITIZENS!!!!!
Am I the only one who thinks it's hilarious that the pilot's lawyer's name is "Flyer"?
How long can they legally make you wait? There is a year + wait times for CCW in many counties