VIC + Reversed Diode = Proper Waveform??? Patent Lies?

SR22:
TLDR located below:
This may be my greatest discovery yet (fortified in later videos). Imagine designing a circuit so simple, that anyone could re-create it. Now imagine that you had to patent the circuit (to save the world), but in a such a way as to not give away the secret sauce. How would you do this? How could you patent a circuit (using the KISS method), but make it 'unusable' to the public?
How about reversing a diode? Cunningly done, perhaps, would still allow for the patent aproval of said technology, but renders the device useless without the hidden knowledge. It's still a diode in the patent(s)... Is there a law that says the diode must be in the correct orientation in order to patent a circuit? Would anyone even have known?!? WHAT IF.... that very thing was done with Stan's tech? As you may know, he was VERY weary of giving away his secret sauce, in fear of theft and undermine.
TLDR:
02:10
I have discovered that reversing the diode in Stanley Meyer's VIC produces beautiful positive polarity pulses. In upcoming videos, I achieve glorious equal opposite polarity pulses --- a waveform similar to the output of the Rotary VIC. The amount of HHO it produces has never been seen before, in any of my solid-state configurations.

[@drgonzo7806]

move the diode to the bottom and reverse it.. it works the same. forward vs flyback mode