V-Ray 6.2 vs Corona 11 | Which is better in 2024???
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- corona or v-ray?
Which rendering engine is really better?
Both are the most popular rendering engines, but choosing which one is really better is a very difficult task.
In this video, we try to have a categorized comparison of the latest versions of both engines so that you can find the right option more easily.
⏱️ Timestamps
0:00 Intro
0:27 Render Time & Texture & Light
2:30 Frame Buffer
4:26 Details
6:12 Result
Follow us on Instagram:
/ mimviz.studio
© MIMViz Studio - 3ds Max online school
#vray #coronarender #visualization
A very detailed and practical comparison👏🏻thank u 🌟
Thanks 😊🌱
Thanks for a great comparison. I’ve been using corona for about a year for archviz and now I’m trying to learn vray for a bit more accuracy
Sounds good 👌
whoaah! SUPER LIKE THIS!
🙏🏻❤️
how we can work between enscape & vray?? i mean which version of the both programs needed for this function??
Thanks for your comment. 💕
You need enscape 3.5.6 and higher and vray 6.2
With the help of this transition, you can use the full capabilities of vray to get the output.😊
Perfect 👌🏼🔥🔥
thanks ❤️❤️
Is this gpu or cpu? Light cash or brute force? Is the color management ACES? There’s so much missing information.
Thank you for your comment. This comparison is done in cpu and basic and beginner settings. In the following comparisons, we will consider more parameters for comparison. 🌱
Thank you
🙏🏻❤️
You could use in Corona 2d pan zoom, it works like real zoom in Vray
Yes, this item works. thanks
very useful 🔥👍🏻
❤❤
Very interesting video, thanks a lot!
But you should also compare speed and quality of V-Ray engine with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map technique. That's where V-Ray takes huge advantage)
Great point!
Thank you for your comment. Yes, it definitely is. We will definitely make a video about this. ❤️😊
good bro
but vray 6.2 too fast now
If you do with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map, then the quality of realism will be far worse than corona, even less than chaosvantage. That method was only used 5 years ago
nice video!
Thanks buddy 🤍🌱
can you please post your system configuration ?
Yes ofcourse.
CPU Intel 12700k
GPU RTX 3070Ti
Memory 32
@@MIMVizStudio Corona time is with cpu cores and vray with gpu corse? Strage result... gpu should be faster... thanks
As I know, Vantage will support Corona materials soon, so it will be great if you have expensive graphic card
Yes, this item was introduced in Chaos Unboxed.
💕💕
I think the real zoom effect can be achieved in corona with the 2d pan zoom. I dont know if it doesnt work for everyone.
Yes, you are absolutely right
Actually there is no compare between corona R and vray R because the first use path tracing that is more powerful than the ray tracing which vray use so corona dealing with lightning much more better than vray. I don't know why vray don't use the path tracing which I think it will be the future of the engine render in the future. But I think that chaos add corona to there company so they have the tow engine each with different types of algorithm (path&ray) tracing.
Thank you for your complete and expert explanation. ☺️❤️🙏🏻
Corona CPU faster that V-Ray GPU in rendering time ?!? It's a joke your test ?
no my friend Corona is faster if we put both engines on cpu. If you pay attention, the gpu in Viri is one of its most attractive features.
True
Muy buena comparación amigo, para mí corona ganó por el tiempo y la velocidad y el precio también, corona siempre ha tenido una calidad aceptable
Thanks for your comment 😌❤️
The unfortuate thing is that Chaos group own both render engines, so its not in their best inerests to give one all the bells and whistles and instead make them both have pros and cons.
Thank you for your comment.
You spell it right and this is the policy of this company so that it can have specific customers for each rendering engine.
vantage will available soon in corona actually
Yes, this is very good news.
Me confuse in blender it's not a user friendly, but corona render is way more better than vray, I just use vray becoz of chaos vantage
thanks for your comment
But Corona Crashes lot more than Vray, that’s why I prefer Vray
Thanks for your comment and your explanation 🙏🏻😌
What about Arnold
In the future, we may produce its video
Vray is awesome....
Corona have many limitations.
Thanks for your comment ❤️🌱
I use to like vray but corona is very fast on cpu
Thanks for your comment 🤍🌱
Test mal feito, Vray tem muito mais qualidade do que o test feito no video, este tipo de teste deve ser feito por quem entenda de renderizaçõa e saiba usar bem os dois programas.
Thank you for your comment.
vray has a lot of power in other cases and more control in the render setup, which was mentioned in the summary video, and in the future we will provide a video with more details.😌🙏🏻🌱
ai is better…😢😢😢
ai is developing a lot and is scaring many people day by day. And we must try to accept it and add it to our work.
FAKE
Please express your opinion fully and with reasons🙂🙏🏻
how much experience you have ?@@MIMVizStudio
how much your experience about rendering field @@MIMVizStudio
The recorded video is a comparison between the mentioned items. And during the video, it has been said many times that both rendering engines have their own advantages and the user can choose it according to his needs.
Our team has 7 years of experience in the field of rendering.
Again, tell me something that you think can be useful for others.
Thank you for your opinion
Hmm... both the render engine has their strengths and weaknesses, but being from blender background, their workflow gives me a headache. Its like constant fiddeling with controls and plugins. Whereas in cycles, you are done with just a few clicks. Also the realtime workflow is faster in cycles. Among Vray and Corona, corona looks a better choice, but that 3ds max workflow and its UI makes me wanna vomit on my PC everytime I open it.
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us. We hope that in the future, the problems of both rendering engines will decrease and create a user-friendly environment for everyone.
On the contrary, I feel using blender is counterproductive to me. Importing from sketchup often gives me inconsistent accuracy (missing objects, improper quads, etc).
And what makes me want to stick to 3ds max is the ability to group objects flawlessly and separate them by layers. In blender, you can use container, but putting objects in container takes lot of time. In my projects, grouping is a must, I have to make around 300+ groups on average before I start working on my scene.
Also, the ability to access multiple professional 3d assets such as 3dsky, bendtrade, etc. is what separate professional archviz artist from hobbyist using blender.
Thank you for your comment and opinion🙂@@sambagyarta
@@sambagyarta Yeah I agree on the sketchup part but a good archviz artist will never look towards SketchUp other than just to import some assets which work quiet seamlessly with newer versions of sketchup importer plugin.
I have never used grouping so I wont know how that works or make the life easier but I think most of those can be taken care of with the collections and also parenting. Different workflows I guess, but what I like is the ability to work without even moving my mouse to fiddle with the tabs and buttons and that clumpsy autodesk UI. Its the UI that bugs me the most and it just gives me headache.
Also having a huge library is good but its also so much time consuming to select the objects. But blender is also catching up pretty fast with blenderkit and other libraries. Also the professional libraries have already started giving out their blender versions so that's not much of a big deal. So lets enjoy what we have build the best we can.
All these opinions are my personal. I started by learning 3ds max but was quickly bored with so many windows, tabs and buttons and the UI that I had to drop and move to Cinema4d. And after that to blender. But its good that Vray is coming to blender too. Hopefully we will be able to enjoy the best of both the worlds.