The Global Refugee Crisis | FULL DEBATE | Doha Debates | Douglas Murray, Marc Lamont Hill and More
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 05. 2024
- For our debut of Doha Debates, we were joined by Marc Lamont Hill, Douglas Murray, Muzoon Almellehan and Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini. Ghida Fakhry moderated a Majlis-style conversation on the global refugee crisis.
►► Subscribe & join the conversation: bit.ly/38fuJjZ
►► Subscribe to Course Correction: megaphone.link/QF2056074382
Don’t Settle for a Divided World. Think. Debate. Act. Let’s find solutions to the world's most pressing problems.
00:00 - Refugee Crisis
00:55 - Opening Remarks
04:50 - Speaker Introductions
08:24 - Marc Lamont Hill
17:48 - Douglas Murray
31:16 - Muzoon Almellehan
41:50 - Online Reactions
44:41 - Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini (Connector)
50:31 - Audience Questions
01:21:13 - Ending Remarks
Doha Debates examines the world's most pressing challenges through live debates, digital videos, a TV series, blogs and podcasts. This innovative approach includes Majlis-style conversations designed to bridge differences, build consensus and identify solutions to urgent global issues.
►► Follow us on Facebook: / dohadebates
►► Follow us on Twitter: / dohadebates
Douglas Murry has huge balls to be the outlier in a huge room full of people who despise him. You can see when he starts talking that everyone has their arms folded and is looking at him with contempt. What a total boss.
It helps that Marc is down about 30 iq points on him.
@@Rallylabs You give Hill too much credit.
Douglas is a rock star
Douglas is a bitch who supported every war in the destabilised region. Wants to bomb countries but doesn't want to accept the repercussions. Neo con loser
@@mustafaalawad8348 Even without western interventionism, the Middle East would not be a peaceful, thriving place. Women's genitals would continue to be mutilated, Muslims would still oppress ethnic minorities, gays would continue to be thrown off of rooftops, and women would still be slayed in honor killings. It would not be all rainbows and sunshine.
Douglas Murray won this debate hands down. Objective, practical, honest. Logical, factual. Worst debate host that I have ever witnessed.
Absolutely, she thinks that speaking incredibly fast over people, is clever. She has NO Class.
Considering what Country Douglas Murray was in, his answers were INCREDIBLY BRAVE and TRUE without Wishing to cause insult. He spoke from his heart and the Audience SQUIRMED.
Douglas is a legend, should be UK PM and I'm indian Asian saying that
I am sure pretty much every rational person in India would side with Douglas any day of the year
💯 I would LOVE to see Douglas as a political leader, even though I'm American. The West in general needs people like him!!!
The irony of this being hosted in Qatar when they take pretty much zero refugees while having the funds, plus being much closer culturally to accept them.
+ the thousands of human rights violations that nobody seems to talk about anymore
Another subject that was touched upon was democracy, also a bit ironic.
Yup exactly! And yet they LOVE to sit around and insult and condemn the West for only taking in 300k or a million lolzzzzz
I cannot believe how arrogant and rude that women is 🤦🏼♀️💁🏼♀️
yupp.. make me respect douglas even more.. what a class act
Wow, what an outrageously biased debate! Full marks to Douglas Murray for remaining calm and rational in the face of brazen rudeness and provocation!
To be [un]fair, he definitely didn't have Homecourt advantage in this case. (read : Doha, Qatar).
One against four "and they're still afraid of him" ... He wiped the floor with them... The number of lies proceeding from the group about security threats & crime coming with refugees was unbelievable... And that's just one point... Their hypocritical ignorance when it came to so-called "colonization" & the so-called "white savior" was unbelievable too... Considering they're discussing what predominantly "white" nations should be doing in helping predominantly "brown & black" nations... You can't be that demanding of "white" people's help & then ridicule the fact that "white" people are helping... The whole thing was ludicrous from start to finish... Agreed that Douglass was a legend in that debate... They're lucky he didn't get the chance to open up on them... You can tell he had much more to say.
@@rigelb9025 It's nothing to do with "homecourt advantage" Douglas is well used to debating in a hostile crowd... But you've got "four" people on that stage "including the host" making one argument, while you have only "one" person in Douglass Murry making the other argument to a crowd who's in complete agreement with the "four"... That's not a fair debate by anyone's standards... Yet he still won... They resorted to misinformed slander about so-called "colonization & white saviors" then proceeded to outright lie about the crime statistics & security threat coming with open doors & so-called refugees... Then to laugh at the freedom of speech being attacked when Douglas made the point while talking about freedom of expression when it comes to minority rights against the majority in the host nations... The outrageous intentional ignorance & hypocrisy of the pro-open borders crowd was astounding.
@@solideogloria...7421 That's pretty much what I meant when I said he was at a disadvantage, ESPECIALLY considering where this debate was held.
The debate is in English. That is the point. For their views to reach English speaking people. The pushback is from their point of view and both speakers got pushback. Murray a bit more. Wasn't his best performance but he was in a hostile environment. It's clear to me globalism is not sustainable. We need decentralized municipalism. Where we keep our cultures intact. Right now we have open borders for commerce and closed borders for labor. That's exploitation.
This debate was infuriating to listen to, the gall to suggest the west is an intolerant nightmare while sitting in Qatar is actually insane. How tolerant would the gulf states be if the west moved to their countries by the millions? Douglas was the only intact brain stem in the room.
These hypocrites WOULDN'T let people move into them by the millions! 2.6 million people live in Qatar and only, 313,000 of them are Qatari citizens and you can only get a passport if you prove you have Qatari descent...
@@rsr789 exactly
They don’t even want fellow Muslim to move to their country while criticising Europe
Yeah I rolled my eyes so hard I can see my brain on fire listening to this shyt.
If the alcohol and speedo loving tax payers of England are so awful, why do you still want to come? I detected an awful lot of snobbery coming from the moderator and her friends.
The entire panel is insufferable, arrogant to high heavens.
If this is what educated Muslim migrants/citizens think like, imagine the average Muslim/migrant
💯
4 against Douglas and he still makes more sense.
He makes zero sense. It was great seeing Doug struggle and feel like the victim here. I have bookmarked the video.
@@jjruss8238 Douglas struggle?!?! 😂😂
Douglas is the most articulate, more knowledgable!@@jjruss8238
Cope Harder jjruss
@@jjruss8238dude don’t show your ignorance
Woman: "Douglas you suggest that" "You suggest" "You make the suggestion that"
Douglas: "When did I suggest that?"
Woman: Moves to next point straight away.
What a vile woman, completely clueless and out of her depth 😂
It's like the Newman effect when Cathy Newman interviewed Jordan Peterson... "So you're saying..."
You haven't been to many Arab countries have you. It shows.
@@Melondays874 if you lived in Arab countries you would know they talk like this all the time. It's not abnormal. This is how they debate. Your panties in a bunch makes me laugh
@@1848revolt For a nomad that's possibly turned native, you have a vigorously nationalistic European name, old bean!
because he strongly implies and then denies! woah look at that, that rhymes!
Douglass is on an entirely different level of intelligence, knowledge, wisdom and nuance. Moderator isn't a moderator, she's an activist.
nuance which leads to bigotry, apparently
@@AC-mp7cx You've misused the word so much it means nothing now. You've called everyone bigot when only very few are, and certainly not Douglas. You don't even know how stupid you are. This is the recent mistake of the West. You are no longer taught that humility is a virtue. Then you get too many stupid people thinking they're smart all day when even smart people get things wrong...
@@AC-mp7cx Just because someone is calling you Muslims out on your violent bullshit doesn't make people bigoted.
An activist of what?
@@tomorrowneverdies567 Doesn't even really matter. What matters is she showed how biased she is when she's supposed to be there to be as unbiased as possible in an event that's supposed to present the merits of every position present. She failed to do so. Activist means she failed to do her job properly.
Can't she shut up and let Douglas explain himself ? Awful and unprofessional behavior .
The moderator is insufferable. Constantly interrupting Douglas who speaks with logic.
The moderator certainly shows her bias and rude manners.
Has anyone noticed how the host keeps interrupting only Murray but doesn’t do it with others? And they say racism flows only one way 🙄
Yes I noticed. She was deliberately antagonistic 👎
Is it racism or that she doesn't agree with his opinion?
Yes. She had an agenda... it failed dismally.
@@Enceladus007 she liked the sound of her own voice!!
uh hundred percent
Qatar talking about human rights & refugees. What a joke!
Just finished watching, I'm a son of a refugee family in London and i agree with Mr Murray a billion percent
Thank you and God bless you! See what people don't realize is that we LOVE AND WELCOME refugees and migrants like you and your family! We WANT a fair, healthy amount of immigration of people that WANT to celebrate and support our nation. I don't understand why it is so "criminal" to not want to bring in people that DON'T LIKE our country?? It makes no sense lolz.
This panel is bananas. 😂 Douglas is the only person not living in an fantasy.
Douglas Murray vs. an echo chamber of virtue-signalers.
Moderator was disrespectful, unprofessional and combatative.
I have no interest in watching the rest of the debate.
Murray boy went in alone and finished the crusade without a single bloodshed. Huge respect
Crusade. Hell yeahhh 😂
Let's just agree here: Douglas Murray is real as it gets!
Douglas did a wonderful job calling out the hypocrisy of Qatar. How can they criticize the West when they haven't taken in any refugees?
they have more immigrants per capita do they not? Imagine Britain with 1.1 million immigrants.... they scream '' invaaaaasion '' with a mere 1.1% change in immigration in 2015 - , just imagine 60 million afraid like - that is fragile - in comparison to 60 - 80 percent immigrants in some of these middle eastern countries and still they have low crime rates, much much lower than britain's - Do Europe get the 'bad eggs' ? or is their treatment of them disgusting? I was in Austria recently - 10 years these people are just sitting there on government assistance as they aren't allowed to even work and make something for themselves - how can one justify this? then when crime starts - they start the narrative " immigrants causing crime rates to rise this past year etc etc " - not " 10 years and still no papers for these people who came to seek asylum, being forced to feed their children with drug money and hidden underground markets , Austrian government still has no answers, how long can this go on for? How long can we keep the public blind t o this?"
Well the ones they do take in end up being slaves for their construction projects anyway.
But they didn't sign up to take refugees is a pretty valid arguement if we are being fair. It's our own fault for getting ourselves into this situation
Worse, they follow an Arab supremacist cult that was forced to stop slavery in 1952 and following the supremacist cult of Islam they discriminate against non Ms in law.
So, this accusation that the West needs to be more accommodating is a joke.
@@stevepickford3004 True, but it if it is a question of morals as the host suggested then why they are not taking them in should be challenged.
Moderator is a disgrace in terms of her conduct, and not neutral as a moderator should be.
Surprise surprise, this is held in Qatar, one of the region's largest supporter of terrorism.
"How many Syrian refugees did Qatar take, maybe it is something worth thinking about here"? Gotta love Mr Murray.
So Qatar is the barometer of human rights? By the way Jordan gave refuge to millions of Syrian refugees so did Lebanon and Turkey which makes your whole argument just as fictitious as your attempt to mask your racism and bigotry.
@@aamnahere6250 Why is it bigot and racist to remind a bunch of Qataris that they are the last people on earth to give lessons to the West when it comes to refugees and citizenship? By the way, Turkey is one of the reasons why Syrians have to flee...
@@tomasmccauley569 And? What's your point?
Fyi if you are a Qatari women that chose to marry a non Qatari guy. Her children arent eligible in getting the passport. Qatar is a hypocrite for not taking refugees while it's one of the richest country in the world
@@aamnahere6250 Douglas was responding to the moderator pointing the finger at the West for not taking enough refugees,while ignoring the lack of aid from 'some' countries on Syrias doorstep,eg Qatar.Show me why thats racist?
Oh my god, that "host" is insufferable. She asks Murray a question then constantly interrupts him, shifts the goalposts as he’s speaking, gives a weird “aha, gotcha” snide comment then moves straight to the next question without him even being able to get a sentence out. How did she even get the job? The role of a debate host is to be an impartial moderator, not bombard your guests with childish traps to push your own agenda. I felt like throwing my laptop out the window while watching this. What an awful woman.
That's got the finger prints of the editors from Al Jazeera. Complete propaganda machine
She is so very, very dreadful, I couldn’t stand to listen to her constant interruptions and subjective gibes. Douglas Murray, as usual, intelligence and common sense personified.
Very very nasty
Host is not professional ! Super agitated and constantly interrupting Douglas !
Yes she was very rude. Probably had that all planned out.
The only person that espouses peace, love, and understanding is Douglas Murray! How has western civilization been bamboozled this bad🤔😢 Truly mind boggling and completely disgusting😢🤬 Is it possible to speak honestly anymore? Apparently not😭😤😢
Professor Mark Hill. He represents everything wrong with higher education in the US.
Such as? Enlighten us please.
Yoooooooo seriously!!! 💯 true! Oh and btw, I'm a professor myself and higher academia has become INFESTED with these pseudo-intellectuals that are literally just mouthpieces for Marxism. All they do is indoctrinate students. It is disgusting and so tragic honestly, because college is now a disgrace when it was once held in such high regard. I miss the days when we actually TAUGHT our students how to think, not WHAT to think. And if you try to tell me that this "isn't happening" you are either DEEPLY DISHONEST or DEEPLY IGNORANT to what is going on behind the scenes. Teachers across the nation are literally being TRAINED to only teach certain ideologies AND to only teach THROUGH certain ideologies. Meaning, that most of the marxist theories are baked into the pedagogical approaches of Teachers and any kind of criticism or even questioning of these approaches or materials is NOT ALLOWED. Example, you can squawk all day long about how evil whyte people are, and how evil males are, and how America is the devil, and Christians are violent extremists, and that being gay is amazing and that everyone should be trans and we should medically intervene in minors-- you can be as loud as you want about any of this. But the very MOMENT you even stop to slightly question or even just consider any of this, you will be silenced, punished, expelled, or fired. An absolutely acceptable question of "should we allow permanent medical intervention for minors?" becomes "HOW can we better support and provide medical transition to minors".... and you don't see a problem with this?
Education USED TO BE about critically examing an issue or topic from a multitude of perspectives. That does not exist any longer on college campuses and this DIRECTLY correlates (and I would argue is CAUSAL) to the exponential increase in wokeism and hyper-left ideologies from college students.
The moderator is clearly biased and utterly impolite.
The host should be sacked. She seems to think the job of a host is to speak more than the panelists. She was incredibly unprofessional. She was employing all kinds of logical fallacies. She wouldn't allow Douglas to answer her illogical points. She was so insulting. If I were Doha Debates I would be seriously embarrassed.
Well she did her best…knowing Douglas could and likely WOULD annihilate every opp in there including her bias azz so she just did what she could which was talk over him and not let him finish his points. It was all bush league but it sort of worked although it didn’t make her look very good. 🤷♂️
Dear Ghida Fakhry, the concept of moderating a debate does not mean that because with a sweat and low voice, you actually bring something clever. Putting words, intentions, judgments and morals in your guest instead of letting them to speak out is the worst thing someone can do in a debate. It is a good thing that people were allowed to speak 4-5min before having a 'conversation' with you, otherwise the waste of time would have been total. At least, some of them put you at your place before you could ashamed yourself even more. Please, change for a more accurate job for you.
She's just serving her masters
Douglas, out numbered but not out gunned or out classed. He dominates, as usual.
He is the smartest on the panel
How can one dominate shadow pictures on a wall?
True to form.
That fairy is a fascist who represents the very destructive legacy of the west. Is his view that's led us to where we are.
absolutely not. He curbed his strong anti Muslim views here because he knew this wouldn't slide in a strong, rich Muslim nation. He is a smart man, but his enmity and misdirection of hatred towards Muslims and Islam holds him back
The female moderator was nothing but rude - interrupting, putting words in Douglas Murray's mouth, and downright biased. Embarrassing. And I have no doubt she was educated in the UK and raised in the West and has never wanted for anything in her life, including the ability to express her speech freely, wear Western clothing, and go wherever she pleases.
What do you expect for someone who both works for the Socialist LSE (birth-giver of numerous Socialist politicians in the UK and abroad), and for the UN. She is a mouthpiece for Globalists and Socialists the World over.
This really did not age well. Douglas Murray had to put up with that horrible woman constantly putting words in his mouth that he did not say and then talking over him. The only person worth listening to was Douglas.
The moderator's behavior was disgraceful.
This is horrid, that moderator should be utterly ashamed of herself.
Douglas Murray knows his stuff. He doesn’t suffer fools lightly. He’s far too smart for this woman . He has done his homework she clearly hasn’t. He’s tied her up in knots.
How can a Moderator moderate when she’s already so biased and in her own closed world of set narratives.
Moderator was a joke.
Douglas Murray is the only sensible man in this conversation
The worst moderator I've seen. She always put words in Douglas Murray's mouth, not even getting Douglas to finish his point.
1:19:22 The silence from the entire crowd, wow. Douglas Murray more than won this debate
their faces are hilarious
They just shat themselves there.
That was hilarious 😂 zilch citizen 😅
For real!
I've always liked Douglas Murray, but my respect for him just shot up . To be able to clearly articulate your views when you have a confrontational moderator and a whole panel and audience that disagrees with you must be SO difficult. Nevermind that he can make respectful quips, convey his points without missing a beat, challenge the audience is just objectively really commendable.
He is a master debater. Learnt from the best - Christopher Hitchens
absolutely not. He curbed his strong anti Muslim views here because he knew this wouldn't slide in a strong, rich Muslim nation. He is a smart man, but his enmity and misdirection of hatred towards Muslims and Islam holds him back
@@AC-mp7cx lol shit attempt to discredit the guy. Please point out any anti Muslim rhetoric from any of his books, many newspaper columns or debates. I'll wait...
@@AC-mp7cx Time number 4 with your copy and paste...
@@AC-mp7cx Try curbing the violence/not murdering cartoonists and treating women/homosexuals better and the civilized world will be a whole lot more receptive to your currently thoroughly backwards religion.
You don’t have to like Murray to know this was unfair. The host was bias & didn’t let him talk.
Europeans and Americans bad. That’s the hosts opinion.
Bravo Douglas Murray!!!
👏👏👏👏
This was one of the worst debate I saw. Douglas Murray was the only one who wasn't clouded by stupid ideologies.
Douglas Murray was the star of the show. The moderator was an absolute disgrace and tried defending the Arab money who was paying her wages. Douglas was the best and most intellectual person in the room.
Poor Douglas Murray stuck between people who can't debate.
Doha has absolutely disgraced itself with this infantile dialogue.
It should be ashamed of it's conduct.
Go Douglas the only sane person in the room.
Douglas Murray is the only one that made sense!
I have no issue with the moderator participating in the debate. However, I find it unprofessional that the moderator interrupts while questions are being answered. Additionally, it's concerning when the moderator misrepresents or spins statements that were not made. Such actions can detract from the quality and fairness of the debate. This was totally unprofessional
I have to say… the host was terrible. She only tried to nitpick Douglas because she didn’t agree but just ate up everyone that fit her narrative to make her feel like she has moral high ground.
The point Douglas makes about Syrians not being given Qatari citizenship was brilliant.
I think he tried hard not to say it but in the end he js couldn't hold it in
The host is an embarrassment. Douglas made valid points she kept interrupting him. What a joke of show.
Quite ironic talking about refugees in a Arab country when the Arabs will not take a single migrant from any other Muslim country.
Really wanted to hear Douglas Murray’s side of the discussion but the intellectual dishonesty of the rest of the participants was, quite frankly, too much to bear.
Ghida Fakhry is the worst moderator I have ever seen. She would have been better as speaker rather than moderator with her obvious agenda.
Fackhery...the h and y are silent😅
Jesus Christ this was painful to watch
Props to Douglas for his patience
I'd suggest that the 'Moderator' stick to her job - which is to to facilitate, review and guide the discussion, not become part of it! Her ignorance, bias and obvious inability listen to any answer that doesn't jell with her own views reflects poorly on her and these 'debates' in general. Her desperate attempts to thwart Douglas Murrays responses made her look the fool she obviously is.
You're absolutely right! I found her infuriating! She, in essence, seems to hold the belief that countries like the UK should be completely borderless and should blindly accept a limitless amount of immigrants into our country!!
Why?.....As punishment for some historic proposed crimes that were allegedly perpetrated by the long dead ancestors of the first world people alive today!!
Its madness!! Crazy thinking!
What I hated most about this is that Murray gets shut down by the host every time he tries to put his point across
Yes I'm watching this as well, she keeps cutting him and challenging his points, almost as if she has an agenda here. She doesn't do that with any other speaker. Poor Douglas having to suffer fools all the time.
I’m a refugee that resettled in the U.S. Every country has a right to sovereignty. Protect your borders and screen every single person before allowing them in. The current residents have priority for safety over foreign nationals waiting to get in. If you’re going to live in another country, you should assimilate and adapt to your new country that takes you in. If you’re going to hate the new country’s culture and values, you should move on and go to another country with similar culture and values. Don’t try to change anything. Do not try to make your host country similar to the place you left behind.
Wow 👏 👏 👏 see, you are the exact kind of refugee/immigrant that we LOVE AND WELCOME! America is soooooooo much more accepting and welcoming of immigrants than ANY OTHER COUNTRY! And yet, all we ask is that you come here and respect our country, respect our culture, learn the language, and contribute. If you do that, then you are a fellow AMERICAN!
What a hero is Douglas Murray…🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Douglas is absolutely right, would Qatari's be expected to change their behaviour for Pakistani workers?
Another case of ‘guests’ expecting that they have A RIGHT to migrate to another country. It’s not a right, it’s a gift - so bloody well appreciate it!
A moderator with an obviously humongous vested interest in the debate... how surprising.
Douglas handled it with style and grace, bless his soul.
She was so aggressive it made watching the debate very uncomfortable.
@@marwar819 not aggressive in her tone at all
I dont think you can call her a moderator
She's a parody of a moderator.
Agitator?
tyrannator
MUSLIMS in WEST discussing amongst themselves HOW TO GET MORE MUSLIMS INTO THE WEST
Clever Indeed.
Yep. It's like having a panel of Hamas members discussing what policies Israel should adopt.
😂😂😂😂😂😂@@jtstevenson81
This is a joke.... she doesnt let people speak at all....
This isnt a debate it is propaganda unfortunatly...
Funny that douglas still kicked her but 😂
Signs of inferiority this is why she was attacking Mr Murray.
Let’s move to Qatar with our booze and Speedo’s and ask them to accommodate us.
They don't claim to be democratic
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 Then why bother with the illusion of a democratic debate. Especially about a subject in which they don't actually believe, as evidenced by the fact that they do not take in refugees or asylum seekers. Oh that's right, because this debate is focused on the west and how we're not doing enough to help. How convenient.
😅
Exactly.Let's move to Qatar and.expect them to integrate with us.
I couldn't finish this 'debate', that moderator is an absolute disgrace. How could you allow her on stage
What an utter waste of time. The lady keeps cutting off Douglas Murray. Fast-talking car salesman lady.
I'm an immigrant from Mexico to the U.S. It is not racist to think that I, as an immigrant going to another country, should adapt and accept the culture that I'm moving to. Not the other way around. Of course people shouldn't be racist or bigoted in any way, but if a westerner was to move to China or Saudi Arabia, they would not just be expected but demanded to adapt to those cultures.
Why is it in the West the same can't be asked of immigrants coming here? Instead, racism is used as an excuse to shut down the conversation of British, American or Australians for example, to have the right to keep their own cultures.
I would not want Mexico to be de-mexicanized if you will. Mexico has a beautiful culture and should have the right to keep that culture without apology.
This host is nauseating and so biased that is difficult to listen to her. Douglas Murray made very very clear and fair points.
except Douglas, who is the only brutally honest person in the panel, the hypocrisy of the rest of the people there is just appalling.
Douglas is outstanding
Ms. Fakhry is without a doubt the worst moderator...she barks out question after question without giving Douglas Murray the opportunity to respond...but I suppose this is to be expected as she's not really interested in hearing anything that might debunk her falsehoods and half-truths.
And her SMUG and MEAN attitude !! She does not have an atom of honesty, impartiality and objectivity.
I mean she used to work at Al Jazeera. So Islamic mouthpiece
How about Arabs try and find solutions amongst yourselves in your own countries. Why is that NEVER possible???
Can y'all get an actual moderator, instead of this person who is biased in favor of one side so much so that she interrupts Douglas Murray constantly?
It's only fair that there be a handicap system. Marc Lamont Hill is at least two tiers below Murray in skill level.
The amount of mind numbing stupidity in this debate. How did Douglas Murray went through this all the way is beyond me. This is incredible.
Mph os M*******
As usual Douglas is on point. How he puts up with the host and the other panelists is beyond me.
Moderator: "I'm going to moderate this 'talk' by asking questions, and utterly preventing anyone from answering the questions that I have thus posed."
She is a complete disaster!
Who tf hired this woman????
Worst discussion i heard this day
Came here only for Douglas Murray.. He makes sense.. The others just kept pandering the victim cards...
Wow this is one of the worst put together debates. That woman needs to be fired or replaced.
Honestly I just want to hear Douglas Murray finishing a response. This was not a debate nor a discussion. It was simply Ghida Fakhry launching bias statements one after another with a clear purpose to attack Douglas Murray, even putting words in his mouth. She did not seem to be asking the questions in good faith or wanting any actual answers. It is a huge shame, and extremely unfair to the audience who wants equal and respectful discussion that illustrates ideas from both sides.
Douglass holds his own incredibly well and comes out like a champ. The moderator pulls every cheap trick in the book.
No. Your just mad that your ideology got defeated
@@mania4270 No. The moderator was rather combative against Murray and the videos which were played showed a clear bias against his postion. Also it speaks ill of you by assuming the original poster has an "Ideology" by just going off of what he said in the original comment.
@@lukeappleberry827 the moderator wasnt rude. If you seem like you're going off on tangent, the moderator has to stop you before you start to ramble. He was rambling at one point. Lastly, his position was dangerous to let his talking points be displayed. Its like having someone justify their racism, it kinda doesnt matter at that point. He literally said you should listen to the ppl who have a problem with immigration, like just hear them out. Im paraphrasing a bit there. But the reason why its bullshit its because the opinion of a citizen about whether someone enters their country doesnt matter. If I want to live in america or where ever, its none of your business. So moderator cut him off because nonsense like that leads to unintelligent debates like the one im having now
Okay, firstly nothing Murray said was racist. I understand that's a common buzzword for people to spit out when they encounter an idea that differs from their own, but as states previously nothing he said could be termed "racist" as you describe it. Secondly for you to say that citizens of a country do not have the right to say who does or doesn't enter their country via immigration is asinine. Thirdly but not lastly this only goes to show how you feel and are very much the ideologue you portrayed the original poster to be. Now finally this is not a debate, simply me explaining to a misguided troll how their opinion is junk.
"His positions were dangerous to let his talking points be displayed." That's the problem I take issue with the most from your comments as basically your saying that if you don't like what someone has to say then it is okay to silence them. If you can't recognize the error in that judgement then you my friend are lost. Everyone should be allowed to speak their opinion freely, period. Especially when said opinion is in the form of a debate, as this is. Cause in a debate people are allowed to express their ideas to others in a free and open forum. That's hard to do when a moderator of said debate clearly favors one side of the arguement and is combative to the other.
wow this host is so wrong for this discussion , so biased, she would not let Douglas finish a single line
which means.. hes correct
This was no debate; it was pro-refugee propaganda.
Douglas final ripper " How many Syrian refugees have Qatar made citizens" Silence..... None.
She is a horrible moderator
The moderator is painful obstacle to an honest exchange. Frightful Fakhry
Fahkry LOL. I agree
Mad respect to Douglas Murry for holding his own against an entire mob of people that were out to get him intellectually.
Well, they try to get him emotionally; they can't match him intellectually.
@@ShunyamNiketana Honestly yes,they are far below Douglas in terms of intelligence.
Douglas was the only guest that was interrupted often by the host. Shows who's running things. And what side they are on. Very Biased.
I had to look up Ghida Fahkry's bio. Born in Lebanon but educated in London, she obviously has no concerns that the British society that gave her an education and opportunities is being hijacked and taken over to its detriment and demise. "What western values are so important" [ that you feel threatened by refugees ] ? she asks. "Well how about freedom of speech" Douglas Murray replies - Brilliant! Then when some snickering is heard in the audience, Douglas Murray could not have been more solemn when he squarely faced the audience and despite Ghida Fahkry interruptions (again), forcibly said "it's very easy to laugh about that until you have had friends shot in a newspaper office" - WOW!
Douglas is a hypocrite, his freedom of speech is for white people only. When Muslims try to invoke their freedom of speech, he claims hate speech
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 I'm not especially a fan of Murray, but this woman is racist, arrogant, rude, unprofessional and a lair, as you also appear to be. Name one majority muhammad worshipping country, many of which were stolen by islamic colonizing armies enacting violence, that allows a Sikh, Hindu, Buddhist, Jew, Christian, Pagan or Atheist as a president.
There has been massive ethnic cleansing, expulsion and persecution of those peoples [mentioned] by muslims and today in the world all recent civil wars, apart from Myanmar have all bene between isalmic factions in Islamic nations, islam is riddled with problems. Sharia endorses lying, it is spread by lies and based on lies, it is completely anti scientific and full of fables that make no sense, water, as a simple example is one the easiest substances to contaminate, according to the fraud that founded islam, or more accurately writers who claimed they knew what such a man said 150-200 years after his life claimed water can never be made impure.
This along with many other fallacies and errors can never be accepted in a free world whilst there are rational people left to defend it.
Kindness and tolereance is weakness to islam. If we keep this up,,, we will lose. I hope people wake up
You lost already, read how pussy men complain online but they are pissing their pants to go on streets and fight, your people were strong in the past only when they colonized weaker nations and were so ''brave'' then:), killing the locals etc. now, when this happens on their lands they pee their pants...not strong anymore?
So this “debate” happened in Qatar. The country which would not ACCEPT ANY REFUGEES. And does not accept human rights either.
Exactly.
Why wld you borher wasting your time to debate anything over there.
How many refugees does Qatar take in. .??
@@user-po4fw3zp4r the worst thing was that it was NOT a debate. The whole thing was suppose to be a cordial discussion.
Which made the moderator's behaviour even worse.
The host of this debate is absolutely awful
That moderator is disgusting.
This host is not non partisan she asks tough questions to Douglas and stupid catering questions to the other 2. As usual the best debater is Douglas.
Douglas did the same to Palestinian guests over Israeli guests in the Uncensored show... Where were you then?
@cuteyanimals3938 it's not Isreal that wants to eradicate Palestine but the other way around. And Douglas is partisan as am I about not being antisemitic. Twit