Dynetics showcases a mockup of its ALPACA human landing system | News Blurb
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 09. 2020
- Dynetics showcases a full-scale model of its very unique lander design for NASA’s Artemis program.
WATCH NEXT:
CYGNUS: An evolution to the future of space exploration | SpaceByte • CYGNUS: An evolution t...
Antares with a Cygnus spacecraft | Launch Profile • Antares with a Cygnus ...
The EMU: An overview of NASA’s 40-year-old spacesuits and a look at the future xEMU | SpaceByte • The EMU | An overview ...
Dynetics’ moon lander would be almost completely reusable save for a few drop tanks during its descent to the lunar surface. In this video, we’ll take a look at Dynetics’ lander design and how it fits in the overall Artemis program, and how its mockup will help the company further iterate its lunar vehicle.
#Dynetics #DyneticsHLS #ArtemisProgram
Be sure to like the video and subscribe to the channel so you can see more space related content! czcams.com/users/orbitalveloci...
MORE CONTENT!!
Website: www.orbital-velocity.com/
Twitter: / orbitalvel
Facebook: / orbitalvel
Be sure to sign up for Orbital Velocity's newsletter for a monthly snapshot of the ISS and Artemis programs. mailchi.mp/82e9f792f1fa/thesp...
GEAR/SOFTWARE USED:
+ Adobe Creative Cloud: amzn.to/2srovOQ
+ Adobe CC Student & Teacher Edition: amzn.to/37JIkAi
DISCLAIMER: The links in this description may be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide, I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you! Thank you for supporting Orbital Velocity so I can continue to provide you with informative, digestible and accurate content about human spaceflight!
A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT ODYSSEY
Orbital Velocity aims to offer casual observers and devoted space enthusiasts alike the best media chronicling humanity’s journey toward becoming a multiplanetary species by providing informative, digestible and accurate content.
The story of human expansion into low-Earth orbit and beyond is happening right before our eyes. Starting with the International Space Station, the mission of Orbital Velocity is to act as a “living time capsule” chronicling these ambitions to live and work off the planet.
Video footnotes:
1. NASA HLS awards | April 2020: www.nasa.gov/press-release/na...
2. Dynetics unveils its full-scale mockup | September 2020: www.dynetics.com/newsroom/new...
3. Dynetics Human Landing System | September 2020: • Dynetics Human Landing...
4. ALPACA to use methane fuel | June 2020: • Human Landing System: ... - Věda a technologie
Do you think NASA will ultimately choose Dynetics’ proposal to send astronauts to the surface of the Moon during the Artemis 3 mission or other missions beyond? Comment below!
Be sure to check out these other SpaceByte videos!
CYGNUS: An evolution to the future of space exploration | SpaceByte
czcams.com/video/VJei-0_FajA/video.html
Antares with a Cygnus spacecraft | Launch Profile
czcams.com/video/mTWhzLQfu8g/video.html
The EMU: An overview of NASA’s 40-year-old spacesuits and a look at the future xEMU | SpaceByte czcams.com/video/JOvXR9dJ1Gg/video.html
This plan of going back to the moon could be scrubed or re-routed by the changing of the guard.
Dynetics design looks something made in kerbal space program!!
Dynetic’s design is by far the best of the 3. I mean I’d love to see starship do it, but dynetics is the most realistic.
NASA said it can't land
@@mrdoge3001 link?
Keep it up! You're one of the best providers of space program material on CZcams. Trust me the viewers will follow once word gets around.
Keep Going, your are so close to blowing up!
I am very excited!! I am impressed of your videos!
Thanks, I appreciate that!
@@OrbitalVelocity also i said to my subscribers to SUBSCRIBE to your channel, can i have your channel link?
@@FeatherSpace Sure, thanks so much! Are you referring to this? czcams.com/channels/o48-bDhyhZoMaWO4UJTwGA.html
Yes thanks a lot!
Holy shet I can't believe I found you here
wow amazing great
Great video!
Thanks!
I think the Dynetics design is the best - assuming the SpaceX design doesn't overcome all it's significant challenges in a short space of time. If they do; then SpaceX will eclipse it.
over 15 launches for one lander...(SpaceX)
@@mathewferstl7042 and even só It would be cheaper and deliver 100 times more payload than the Second one. Per massa, It would be hundreda of times cheaper than ANY other
How can humans "go to the moon to stay" with 2 astronauts per landing os beyond me
@@Henrique-hl3xk the soyuz can only deliver 3 people, and we've had a sustained presence on the ISS. I know that's not the greatest example
I think it’s the best concept but the company is a relative unknown so not great odds
Ooh nice moon lander you made these animations by your self??
Thanks! Yes. Not a lot of custom animation in this particular video, but I am working on some launch and mission animations, such as Starliner. I'd like to do a profile for each of the HLS designs.
Awesome
Top!
Dynetics' Alpaca HLS spacecraft reminds me, very vaguely, of Space: 1999's Eagles. I am very impressed by the re-usability and versatility of this vehicle. It offers so much ability in such a (relatively) small package. Is SpaceX can't get its BFR "Starship" vehicle up and running in time for Artemis Three, maybe it will be showtime for Dynetics instead. Details probably are not available, ever today in 2023, but it would be interesting to learn more about it if more information becomes available in the future. How much does the Alpaca crew module weigh? What is that crew module mode of, metal or carbon fiber composite? Is this the maximum payload the vehicle can safely carry to and from the lunar surface? If an Alpaca were to carry a Sierra Space L.I.F.E. habitat inflatable module (for a moon basecamp) instead, how large could that module practically be? Would it be possible to use Alpaca with a LOFTID-style inflatable heat shield, drogues and parachutes for use as an HLS lander for a mission to Mars?
waiting for it
Unfortunately, SpaceX was chosen
ALPACA. Drop tanks in lower orbit or after landing. Any chance of duel purpose use after fuel expensed?
Houston, we can't redock the rover to the mother ship !!! Help !!!!!!!!!!!
NASA will probably award the contract to Blue Origin due to the paranormal phenomenon known as lobbyists.
Even thought that thing is extremely dangerous and expensive
Why do they do that odd orbit around the moon ?
The model of the science fiction series Space 1999 called Eagle is very large that Dynetic had to develop to compete with the starships because that presented was an old miniature of an EAGLE. It should incorporate the Dream Chaser in the front in this model czcams.com/video/SWGuc0JGg7Q/video.html
If a change of administration negatively impacts the Artemis Program, as some in the comments are reasonably speculating, I think it could be a good thing. No commercial marketplace should depend as tightly in congressional funding is the space industry does. If NASA went away today, almost all off-planet activities would cease. Telecoms, remote sensing, and a few other key revenue sources would persist, but that's a far cry from what we know is attainable: space is more that satellites! Something needs to happen up there (and I guess, down here) so that it'll become financially viable for private companies to do all manner of things in space without so much as batting an eye
I very much doubt a change in admin will impact Artemis negatively, if anything a change in admin is likely to give NASA a more realistic approach to Artemis. Seeing as you have atm, a President who doesn't want to work with Congress & Artemis is going nowhere soon as long as you have a split Congress (as is likely to continue no matter who wins). While under a Democratic admin, you're likely to see more of a bipartisan approach to Artemis & it's too far along to cancel (& not pie in the sky like Constellation was in many ways compared to Artemis), so why not continue it?
ur new. i'll give u a try. what about the james webb?
Never gonna happen, never will.
As per angry astronaut - why not Starship to get the payload to the moon - then multiple dynetics landings to the surface - that way we get the payload to the moon and elon does not have to work out how to land on moon. You could go all the way - and have astronauts launched seperately on crew dragons to get them on/off earth - then starship as main payload and crew quarters - dynetics as moon lander - basically reducing overall risk while having lots of payload to moon.
I think nasa will take dynetics to deliver humans and spacex for large cargo, blu origin is out
I believe they will choose Dynetics, because if it's too large, mass is an issue, too small, not enough space, Soo extremely limited in fluids needed for survival!!!
Unfortunately they chose SpaceX. The spacex one looks gay and unrealisticly too big, Dynetics Alpaca lander looks the most realistic.
@@vincedhilandulay7798 the spacex design is already in construction, phase 2 i believe...theengines are being tested over and over again!!! 1. Elon Musk is spending 2.9 Billion of his own money which for NASA is a win win situation!!!
@@letsexchangecansandbadadvi4245 Literally the opposite, NASA will pay Elon Musk 2.9 billion for the construction of it not the other way around.
it looks a simpler system than the national team. less to go wrong. fewer contractors - pity that they don;t team up with spacex as the launcher - but in the end national has more traditional contractors ripe for that good old fashioned pork barrel politics.
how much space junk will these three leave on the moon?