@@FeedTheWorld774 that would show his good character if he removed it but the almighty “clicks” false info generates keeps the bad ones in business too
I'm glad you made this video. I believed it was her nephew - as I couldn't imagine someone lying about it - and putting themselves out there like that for a "laugh." I then went on other videos (like an idiot) spewing the whole nephew story - and adding your video link. I deleted those threads asap this morning. Fiona appears to be such a liar - (with or without the "nephew" aspect) that is wasn't hard to fall into this hole.
That's a really good point actually, although they'd be at least 1 news article about the trial unless there were reporting restrictions which I can't see why there would be. The rabbit hole keeps getting deeper 🤔
@jowallace4986 the only reason I can come up with for their being no open record or anything, is if it was a mental health situation and she was classed as a vulnerable person then nothing would be allowed to be printed. I live in Scotland and I have never heard anything of this until now m.
@Diane-1912 that's interesting, although this happened in London, but patient records would still be confidential like you say. It's a very strange case all-round & IMO, Netflix needs to engage with Fiona to settle any grievances or discrepancies ... & do so in private, which they might be doing.
@jowallace4986 ahh okaysl. I thought the supposed conviction happened here. Ayton, you're righ, Netflix absolutely need to make contact and hopefully something amicable can come of this. Its like a more serious Tiger King show, its got the world hooked.
@Diane-1912 the previous interim injunction by the solicitor was in Scotland but it looks like Fiona Harvey then moved to London when she allegedly stalked Richard Gadds, according to his version of events. He said he sought a restraining order against her but she didn't go to prison so she might have moved out of London then as that's a typical pattern with these types of people with behaviourial issues, & it fits in with the previous incident in Scotland. She's may have been receiving treatment elsewhere but it's been reported that her harassing behaviour has started again against other people in the media.
I truly hate dishonest people. If this creator had admitted that the nephew was a liar, (after posting this video claiming he was her nephew), he could’ve made a second video that explained what happened, and outed the fake nephew! He could’ve shown that he strives to get to the bottom of things, and would’ve gained loads of respect. Instead, he deletes comments that explain how the ‘nephew’ lied that she was his ‘auntie’. (This creator has deleted many of my comments in which I discovered the truth.) I used to like this creator. But he’s lost my respect. THIS is why people don’t trust ‘the news’. This creator tells people where to locate the nephew! All of the people who look him up, like I have, won’t trust this guy. HOWEVER!!! If he had cleared the air, and OUTED the ‘nephew’, after posting this video, he would’ve gained so much! He could’ve told his followers that he strives to find the truth, even if it means a little egg on his face. What a lost opportunity!!! I would’ve been amazed by this, and he would’ve gained my trust. Instead… he lost it. I now don’t trust anything he says.
Every one is forgetting she had a hyphenated last name and claimed to use only one of the two last names but why is no one looking in to the other last name, or all of her other aliases? (Fiona Muir-Harvey/ Fiona Muir/ Fiona Harvey).
She is also a lawyer and politician so there might been ways that she had to publicly conceal her records. Especially if she been in a mental ward and was declared "cured" afterwards.
The onus is ALWAYS on the victim in these situations, espwcially with mental health issues involved. The victim has to take all the actions, the victim has to make changes to their life nevause of harassment the victim has to understand the perpetrators feelings and issues, the victim can't react or take action no matter what the perpetrator does, the victim has to not exacerbate things even by behaving in a perfectly normal and/or reasonable way under the circumstances... all sorts. And half the time, the perpetrator faces little or no consequences for their actions, while the victim is affected forever and often finds their life changed in many ways for a long time, or maybe forever, sometimes in major ways. If mental health is involved, the police have a tendency to do nothing as the perpetrator "doesn't have capacity" and "their hands are tied " and various other platitudes to justify their backing off and leaving a victim high and dry suffering mental and emotional torture, which can lead to physical health problems and long term mental health issues for them too. But the "most important" person, the one who gets all the allowances made for them, is the perpetrator and THEIR issues. It's easier to ignore and dumo on the victim and push them to also make allowances that they shouldnt ever have to. It's a hellish minefield. (This is in response to where you talk about Richard Gadd having a voice versus how it affects Fiona Harvey due to media attention)
I feel so badly for this poor woman. While I don't think she handled her first job opportunity correctly, for some former employer who fired her after two weeks to come forward and say "it's uncanny" is truly derogatory. That means then this former lawyer who hired her aligns herself to the writer and his lifestyle choices. I feel that situation, perhaps unwarranted to them, is completely different. I wish people would stop believing fiction as reality and then making this Fiona women receive awful threats and damage to her professional life. She is owed money by many people regarding this. It's clear she never gave her permission in any way for any part of her story to be told. And he claims to have received all these emails and phone calls texts , then why did this dude not change his number and emails? He accepted them. Who else would tolerate that? He obviously liked her attention in some way if it's even true and I am doubting that even 10% of this is true from his series at this point.
How dare you make such allegations, you are no expert, no doctor, no friend of hers or family member. How dare you in your opinion disgrace your own self. Fiction and reality are 2 different things. Serious laws have been broken in this show, privacy, copyright. You gloss over this? What if it was you someone slandered?@@staceysoden3047
saw your video about the "nephew" and refrained from commenting. I knew it was bullshit because he never actually proved he was her nephew. Infact in your video you even posted a question from someone who asked if he was indeed her nephew and he just said yes. like... the very definition of someone saying their source is "just trust me bro". This is why the court of public opinion is horrendously stupid. Everyone believes everything with no proof. If Journalists cant even find her court or prison papers, which even under her previous name she gave in the interview, means one of two things in U.K. law. 1) they dont exist because it never happened, Gadd also admitted he actually made that part up. 2) the courts have withheld that information but upon request could choose to make the documents public to the person(s) that request them. And no journalist has said they have made a request for them. I havent even watched the show because i dont care about people cashing in on stuff like this, like Gadd has done 3 times now.
Someone need to pretend to be dating her and do a Claire’s law on her then that person will be told IF she as a criminal record or stalker charge 🤣😂🤣OJ tho calm down people it’s a joke ❤
At the end of the day, these “sleuthers” are Stalkers themselves. Again, many people who have watched this series have entirely missed the point of the content being presented.
He is gradually revising the truthfulness NOW. At the beginning of the series, on Netflix, on screen the statement is "this is a true story." Seems like Netflix f'd up.
Good vid. Just saying, going forward, be a bit more careful veting people. And I do think Fiona and her attorney have a strong case if she has never been convicted. Did she do some stalking? Probably yes. Does Netflix regret promoting this as a true story and stating that on screen at the beginning of the series? At this point, probably yes. It could easily have been described as "inspired by" or "based on some true events."
They stated that in parliment under oath too. Which was so stupid. If she didn't go to prison for this, which she didn't and didn't assult Terri, then this IS defamation.
Ok the nephew is false but that doesn’t really change anything ! It’s a she said he said and I am sure Netflix checked that he had the text messages and the e-mails to back up his claim. 😮😮😮
She didn't go to prison for this. And we know if for a fact because Gadd said so himself. She got a restraining order and that is all. And ONLY for him, not his family.
Maybe she went to a mental institution instead of prison as a term of probation. That's no uncommon here in the U.S., but can't speak as to what's typical in the U.K.
It’s not that you couldn’t vet him, you didn’t want to take the TIME to do the info due diligence as a supposed you tube journalist. Your just riding this as far as you can and rushing to put anything on video! How about relax a bit?
I don't know about there, but in US you can be found guilty and judged with jail time. But, if you have good lawyers it'll get "deferred " to parole. Then if you don't break the parole rules, when it's over you can get it expunged from your record. That means, no more public record of said charges. Just saying, she's a lawyer and should know.
She changed her name, bro. Idk why everyone just keeps overlooking this... She dropped her "double-barralled" surname - she admitted as much.. so there's that, at the _very_ least . . . Now, knowing the Fiona that we do from the interview + BR, I am by no means prepared to just give her the benefit of the doubt, that she never made any further changes to her name/s... or pulled any number of slick manoeuvres from her legal eagle bag of tricks to obfuscate her criminal history. _________________________ The only reason Piers is giving it so much credence is because he us afraid of getting sued. Fiona will have come at him, too , after the interview blew up in her face. Now Piers has an obsessive lawyer/paralegal with nothing but time , obsession and perceived outrage, coming at him with... (ahem..) _both barrels . . ._
omg I didn't even think about that! She's able to say she didn't go to prison with such confidence, and it's probably because she really didn't go there. She was more likely in a psych ward.
I find odd that in two videos now you've said you "don't know how to pronounce Muir". Dude, it's a five second Google search away. Why does no one ever do their research. You have all of the Internet at your disposal.
From an article in The Times (byline Susannah Butter, Thursday April 11 2024, 12.01am BST, The Times) "In the show, she receives nine months in prison and a five-year restraining order. In real life, he can’t say too much about the real Martha other than “it is resolved. I had mixed feelings about it - I didn’t want to throw someone who was that level of mentally unwell in prison.” (from paragraph six of the article).
Hmmm I have mixed feelings about this. She effectively outed herself and her apparent narcissism drove to her spin a web of lies in the interview. Also, if she did do everything depicted in the series, I don’t really have much sympathy for her. I believe she is currently stalking that Daily Mail journalist who wrote a piece on her.
The first step on the road to recovery is admitting to having a problem . Unfortunately one of the symptoms is believed one is right and the rest of the world is wrong.
@@lourdeslozanodelamota9349 I understand that but they stated that this was a true story and she went to prison- if that turns out to be a lie then none of this story can be taken as true!
So yesterday you are promoting this story about her nephew and now you’re trying to take it back. But the damage is done. And continues as you’ve not removed the video. People on CZcams aren’t journalists and this is the proof. Sadly once you put an incorrect headline out there you’ve done the damage. I stupidly believed your headline without viewing the whole flimsy video.
Second half of the video is literally just you repeating the same information and not adding anything new at all But good job getting clicks and views without doing any proper research I guess lol
i got his earlier video in my recommended and was amazed at how he decided it must be true because the account was made before the show became viral or something... guy is real dumb and just keeps yapping
@@HavianEla But let's call things what they are -- gossip rings. There's a lot of misinformation being spread here because creators need to share the latest to their viewers.
Wild 24 hours, I hope you are more in the loop now!
Sent from iPone
Worra Li’l Fibber… 👀
Sent from my iPhone
maybe remove your previous video?
So your phone adds the “sent by ipone” line “automatically” and includes the typo too?
@@FeedTheWorld774 that would show his good character if he removed it but the almighty “clicks” false info generates keeps the bad ones in business too
@@violetscreaming or do the “clicks” have it?🤮
You weren't "hoodwinked". You just didn't bother to do any due diligence.
Wow !😮
Bingo!
Everyday there is something new 😮 I’m honestly, waiting for Netflix’s reply.
Im on episode 2 so far. In the beginning it says"this is a true story" not based on or anything so if they added anything untrue I think she can sue.
@@Aleyaha699can they though if they changed the name and didn’t give private info?
(I know people found out, but I mean that’s separate from the show)
It will be a second season. That's their reply 😂😂😂
I'm glad you made this video. I believed it was her nephew - as I couldn't imagine someone lying about it - and putting themselves out there like that for a "laugh." I then went on other videos (like an idiot) spewing the whole nephew story - and adding your video link. I deleted those threads asap this morning. Fiona appears to be such a liar - (with or without the "nephew" aspect) that is wasn't hard to fall into this hole.
you find it hard to believe someone would jump on this bandwagon for attention? on the internet? 🤣
If she had been arrested and sentenced but not jailed and sent to a mental health facility then her prosecution won't be found the same way.
That's a really good point actually, although they'd be at least 1 news article about the trial unless there were reporting restrictions which I can't see why there would be. The rabbit hole keeps getting deeper 🤔
@jowallace4986 the only reason I can come up with for their being no open record or anything, is if it was a mental health situation and she was classed as a vulnerable person then nothing would be allowed to be printed. I live in Scotland and I have never heard anything of this until now m.
@Diane-1912 that's interesting, although this happened in London, but patient records would still be confidential like you say. It's a very strange case all-round & IMO, Netflix needs to engage with Fiona to settle any grievances or discrepancies ... & do so in private, which they might be doing.
@jowallace4986 ahh okaysl. I thought the supposed conviction happened here. Ayton, you're righ, Netflix absolutely need to make contact and hopefully something amicable can come of this. Its like a more serious Tiger King show, its got the world hooked.
@Diane-1912 the previous interim injunction by the solicitor was in Scotland but it looks like Fiona Harvey then moved to London when she allegedly stalked Richard Gadds, according to his version of events. He said he sought a restraining order against her but she didn't go to prison so she might have moved out of London then as that's a typical pattern with these types of people with behaviourial issues, & it fits in with the previous incident in Scotland. She's may have been receiving treatment elsewhere but it's been reported that her harassing behaviour has started again against other people in the media.
The show is said to be a true story. Not based on..
Also the actress playing Martha isn't Scottish she is English and her accent was for the role
nope. it literally says at the end of each episode that it is dramatized ...
I truly hate dishonest people. If this creator had admitted that the nephew was a liar, (after posting this video claiming he was her nephew), he could’ve made a second video that explained what happened, and outed the fake nephew! He could’ve shown that he strives to get to the bottom of things, and would’ve gained loads of respect. Instead, he deletes comments that explain how the ‘nephew’ lied that she was his ‘auntie’. (This creator has deleted many of my comments in which I discovered the truth.) I used to like this creator. But he’s lost my respect. THIS is why people don’t trust ‘the news’. This creator tells people where to locate the nephew! All of the people who look him up, like I have, won’t trust this guy. HOWEVER!!! If he had cleared the air, and OUTED the ‘nephew’, after posting this video, he would’ve gained so much! He could’ve told his followers that he strives to find the truth, even if it means a little egg on his face. What a lost opportunity!!! I would’ve been amazed by this, and he would’ve gained my trust. Instead… he lost it. I now don’t trust anything he says.
Every one is forgetting she had a hyphenated last name and claimed to use only one of the two last names but why is no one looking in to the other last name, or all of her other aliases? (Fiona Muir-Harvey/ Fiona Muir/ Fiona Harvey).
She is also a lawyer and politician so there might been ways that she had to publicly conceal her records. Especially if she been in a mental ward and was declared "cured" afterwards.
The onus is ALWAYS on the victim in these situations, espwcially with mental health issues involved. The victim has to take all the actions, the victim has to make changes to their life nevause of harassment the victim has to understand the perpetrators feelings and issues, the victim can't react or take action no matter what the perpetrator does, the victim has to not exacerbate things even by behaving in a perfectly normal and/or reasonable way under the circumstances... all sorts. And half the time, the perpetrator faces little or no consequences for their actions, while the victim is affected forever and often finds their life changed in many ways for a long time, or maybe forever, sometimes in major ways. If mental health is involved, the police have a tendency to do nothing as the perpetrator "doesn't have capacity" and "their hands are tied " and various other platitudes to justify their backing off and leaving a victim high and dry suffering mental and emotional torture, which can lead to physical health problems and long term mental health issues for them too. But the "most important" person, the one who gets all the allowances made for them, is the perpetrator and THEIR issues. It's easier to ignore and dumo on the victim and push them to also make allowances that they shouldnt ever have to. It's a hellish minefield.
(This is in response to where you talk about Richard Gadd having a voice versus how it affects Fiona Harvey due to media attention)
I feel so badly for this poor woman. While I don't think she handled her first job opportunity correctly, for some former employer who fired her after two weeks to come forward and say "it's uncanny" is truly derogatory. That means then this former lawyer who hired her aligns herself to the writer and his lifestyle choices. I feel that situation, perhaps unwarranted to them, is completely different. I wish people would stop believing fiction as reality and then making this Fiona women receive awful threats and damage to her professional life. She is owed money by many people regarding this. It's clear she never gave her permission in any way for any part of her story to be told. And he claims to have received all these emails and phone calls texts , then why did this dude not change his number and emails? He accepted them. Who else would tolerate that? He obviously liked her attention in some way if it's even true and I am doubting that even 10% of this is true from his series at this point.
You would be very alone in feeling this. To align yourself with this psychopathic deranged stalker is disgusting.
Seek help immediately 😵💫😵💫😵💫
How dare you make such allegations, you are no expert, no doctor, no friend of hers or family member. How dare you in your opinion disgrace your own self. Fiction and reality are 2 different things. Serious laws have been broken in this show, privacy, copyright. You gloss over this? What if it was you someone slandered?@@staceysoden3047
It’s Not that difficult to Pronounce - ‘M-YOU-R’ MUIR 🤦🏻♂️ Like Moore but with a ‘Y’ MYOORE
saw your video about the "nephew" and refrained from commenting. I knew it was bullshit because he never actually proved he was her nephew. Infact in your video you even posted a question from someone who asked if he was indeed her nephew and he just said yes. like... the very definition of someone saying their source is "just trust me bro". This is why the court of public opinion is horrendously stupid. Everyone believes everything with no proof. If Journalists cant even find her court or prison papers, which even under her previous name she gave in the interview, means one of two things in U.K. law. 1) they dont exist because it never happened, Gadd also admitted he actually made that part up. 2) the courts have withheld that information but upon request could choose to make the documents public to the person(s) that request them. And no journalist has said they have made a request for them. I havent even watched the show because i dont care about people cashing in on stuff like this, like Gadd has done 3 times now.
This creator is still deleting comments!! 😂😂😂 I posted a reply. It’s gone.
@@emilymarek4714 well most creators do that on youtube and other social media sites.
Someone need to pretend to be dating her and do a Claire’s law on her then that person will be told IF she as a criminal record or stalker charge 🤣😂🤣OJ tho calm down people it’s a joke ❤
Why are people so intent on proving something the creator of the show (Richard Gadd) already said was made up? Leave this woman alone.
At the end of the day, these “sleuthers” are Stalkers themselves. Again, many people who have watched this series have entirely missed the point of the content being presented.
@@TT_09 they are not
He is gradually revising the truthfulness NOW. At the beginning of the series, on Netflix, on screen the statement is "this is a true story."
Seems like Netflix f'd up.
@@petep4peace as Fargo, for example... Did you catch the disclaimer at the end of each episode though ?
Yup, saw this on X
Good vid. Just saying, going forward, be a bit more careful veting people.
And I do think Fiona and her attorney have a strong case if she has never been convicted. Did she do some stalking? Probably yes. Does Netflix regret promoting this as a true story and stating that on screen at the beginning of the series? At this point, probably yes. It could easily have been described as "inspired by" or "based on some true events."
They stated that in parliment under oath too. Which was so stupid. If she didn't go to prison for this, which she didn't and didn't assult Terri, then this IS defamation.
@@joannawinters6592 ohh that's right, that was a Netflix person testifying before Parliament. Yikes.
Ok the nephew is false but that doesn’t really change anything ! It’s a she said he said and I am sure Netflix checked that he had the text messages and the e-mails to back up his claim. 😮😮😮
4:39 she thinks about the dates, her eyes roll back and she’s thinking about the dates. 4:57 she then nods along.
Still, we don’t have any evidence
She didn't go to prison for this. And we know if for a fact because Gadd said so himself. She got a restraining order and that is all. And ONLY for him, not his family.
@@joannawinters6592she’s claiming otherwise in that video
Maybe she went to a mental institution instead of prison as a term of probation. That's no uncommon here in the U.S., but can't speak as to what's typical in the U.K.
Muir rhymes with fewer, I think.
You're all up to your necks in it. She has a lawyer now and it's not just Netfix they’ll be gong after. Lol
It’s not that you couldn’t vet him, you didn’t want to take the TIME to do the info due diligence as a supposed you tube journalist. Your just riding this as far as you can and rushing to put anything on video!
How about relax a bit?
I don't know about there, but in US you can be found guilty and judged with jail time. But, if you have good lawyers it'll get "deferred " to parole. Then if you don't break the parole rules, when it's over you can get it expunged from your record. That means, no more public record of said charges. Just saying, she's a lawyer and should know.
Gaad himself said that she never went to jail in real life... stop this nonsense already
maybe remove your previous video?
She changed her name, bro.
Idk why everyone just keeps overlooking this...
She dropped her "double-barralled" surname - she admitted as much.. so there's that, at the _very_ least . . .
Now, knowing the Fiona that we do from the interview + BR, I am by no means prepared to just give her the benefit of the doubt, that she never made any further changes to her name/s... or pulled any number of slick manoeuvres from her legal eagle bag of tricks to obfuscate her criminal history.
_________________________
The only reason Piers is giving it so much credence is because he us afraid of getting sued. Fiona will have come at him, too , after the interview blew up in her face. Now Piers has an obsessive lawyer/paralegal with nothing but time , obsession and perceived outrage, coming at him with... (ahem..) _both barrels . . ._
It doesn't matter if she changed the name or not. Gadd himself confirmed she didn't go to prison and had restraining order
Muir.... Mew-irr
My old boss his last name is MUIR and it is said jyst as written ( one syllable) not Mew irr
ALL anyone has to do is check..im shocked the public hasn't already. Its easy to grab public records that show if someone has went to prison.
are you american
You are so full of yourself 😂
If she’d done time, surely one of her fellow inmates would have blabbed by now. She was probably sent for psychiatric help.
Very fair point actually!
omg I didn't even think about that! She's able to say she didn't go to prison with such confidence, and it's probably because she really didn't go there. She was more likely in a psych ward.
I find odd that in two videos now you've said you "don't know how to pronounce Muir". Dude, it's a five second Google search away. Why does no one ever do their research. You have all of the Internet at your disposal.
Or understand the difference between vet and verify.
It's almost as though you don't know anything about anything.
From an article in The Times (byline Susannah Butter, Thursday April 11 2024, 12.01am BST, The Times)
"In the show, she receives nine months in prison and a five-year restraining order. In real life, he can’t say too much about the real Martha other than “it is resolved. I had mixed feelings about it - I didn’t want to throw someone who was that level of mentally unwell in prison.” (from paragraph six of the article).
Grr bad!
The fact that people were so willing to believe "the nephew" is a reflection upon her. She's drowning in delusion.
Obviously there was contact !!!😮
No, it's a reflection of you.
Enough is enough, this lady needs to be left alone. This cannot be what we as the human race can be fascinated by. She needs help. I wish i could help
I agree but would have been best if she didn't do the interview.
Hmmm I have mixed feelings about this. She effectively outed herself and her apparent narcissism drove to her spin a web of lies in the interview. Also, if she did do everything depicted in the series, I don’t really have much sympathy for her. I believe she is currently stalking that Daily Mail journalist who wrote a piece on her.
The first step on the road to recovery is admitting to having a problem . Unfortunately one of the symptoms is believed one is right and the rest of the world is wrong.
Notice the silence around the rapist though.
We live in a misogynistic culture
@@user-gd5hm8qv4k I agree 100%. Something is seriously wrong with her - and she obviously has no one in her life to advise her to shut her mouth.
Whys this still up its basically click bait
I'll forgive you this time
In the show she has been sentenced but she might had a suspended sentence.
Then she wasn’t sentenced!
@@angiedavies5530 you can be sentenced 6 months in jail but having it suspended, you are still sentenced but not sent to prison
@@lourdeslozanodelamota9349 I understand that but they stated that this was a true story and she went to prison- if that turns out to be a lie then none of this story can be taken as true!
Or be tagged under house arrest.
Richard Gadd already said it was made up, let it go.
I’d suggest you remove your previous video. Defamation and libel laws in the UK are broad and she seems the litigious type that would sue you.
What if kyle is juat aaying this? And he really is
So yesterday you are promoting this story about her nephew and now you’re trying to take it back.
But the damage is done. And continues as you’ve not removed the video.
People on CZcams aren’t journalists and this is the proof.
Sadly once you put an incorrect headline out there you’ve done the damage. I stupidly believed your headline without viewing the whole flimsy video.
No one should watch this guy
How is it possible after all this time that we don't know the truth?
I think it’s because it’s so hard to actually get access to any files
I believe the trial was written in because that is what Richard wished would have happened. So he wrote it into the story to bring himself closure.
Take your other video down then!!!
M-ure
Second half of the video is literally just you repeating the same information and not adding anything new at all
But good job getting clicks and views without doing any proper research I guess lol
It's pronounced Myoor
Muir, pronounced Moor😊
Thank you! I’ll still get it wrong I’m sure 😂
M-your
@@SimplySaid_like cure, but with an M
I feel that we’re all being gang stalked by CZcams right now!
You pronounce it MYOOR! 😊
no, Mew-irr
that's why we need actual journalists. but there's still a place for reactive pundits like you.
Sent from Ipanema
i got his earlier video in my recommended and was amazed at how he decided it must be true because the account was made before the show became viral or something... guy is real dumb and just keeps yapping
At least this “reactive pundit” retracted the false information to give the truth, unlike MANY journalists today.
@@HavianEla It happens -- Danny Wooten finally apologized to Johnny Depp after Danny got targeted for abuse.
@@HavianEla But let's call things what they are -- gossip rings. There's a lot of misinformation being spread here because creators need to share the latest to their viewers.
AB's mom gives me Trisha vibes.
Rule of thumb ......check your facts then check them again before you put any kind of 'info' out about someone, but fair play to you for apologising 👍