John Mearsheimer: What’s Behind Biden’s Blank Check Support for Israel? | Endgame

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 05. 2024
  • This is the second interview we did with Professor John Mearsheimer on wars and great power politics. Watch the first one here: • John Mearsheimer: Is C...
    In this second interview with American political scientist and international relations scholar John Mearsheimer, we discussed the current status of the war in Ukraine and prospects for resolution, moral issues around Israeli military campaigns in Gaza, deterrence and risks of conflict in the South China Sea, and whether ideology is declining in importance when it comes to international relations.
    #Endgame #GitaWirjawan #JohnMearsheimer
    ----------------------
    About the host:
    Gita Wirjawan is an Indonesian entrepreneur, educator, and currently a visiting scholar at The Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center (APARC), Stanford University. Gita has also just been appointed as an Honorary Professor of Politics and International Relations in the School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, UK.
    ----------------------
    Get “The Israel Lobby” on Periplus bookstore:
    www.periplus.com/p/9780374531508
    -----------------------
    This episode is shot at The Keller Center in Chicago, home to the future of policy.
    Learn more about the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago: harris.uchicago.edu/admissions
    -----------------------
    Earn a Master of Public Policy degree and be Indonesia's future narrator. More info:
    admissions@sgpp.ac.id
    admissions.sgpp.ac.id
    wa.me/628111522504
    Visit and subscribe:
    @SGPPIndonesia
    -----------------------
    Chapters
    0:00:00 - Intro
    0:01:53 - Why Ukraine is in Big Trouble
    0:05:16 - Guns, Troops and Air Power
    0:18:28 - Winning the Peace in Ukraine
    0:23:37 - ‘The Blob’
    0:29:03 - Israel Lobby
    0:35:52 - What Will Iran Do?
    0:37:46 - Cleansing the Palestinians
    0:42:28 - Containing China
    0:50:02 - Conflict in South China Sea
    1:02:47 - Is Ideology Dead?
    1:08:42 - Tools of Great Powers
    1:13:22 - Future of Nuclear Non Proliferation
    1:18:28 - Hubris-Humility Index

Komentáře • 2K

  • @gwirjawan
    @gwirjawan  Před měsícem +401

    When the definition of morality is ambiguous, and when violence is easily justified, what logic will you use to guide your course of action?

    • @gha9543
      @gha9543 Před měsícem +11

      The lunar eclipse 😅

    • @RandyMorris-wq7tr
      @RandyMorris-wq7tr Před měsícem +10

      The reckless and unrighteous actions of your unrighteous goals.

    • @numbersix8919
      @numbersix8919 Před měsícem +16

      United States foreign policy since 1897!

    • @AuditorInvestor
      @AuditorInvestor Před měsícem +8

      Read the Bible. Judge a tree by its fruits.

    • @roboldx9171
      @roboldx9171 Před měsícem

      @@AuditorInvestor Despite the US claims of freedom founded on liberty. Those roots of the tree were in fact founded on the inhumanity of slavery and violence against the Africans. and the disposition of the Indigenous peoples of North America. Evil is indeed in the DNA of its founding fathers and to this day.

  • @JayaMadhavadas
    @JayaMadhavadas Před 10 dny +152

    PROFESSOR JOHN MEARSHEIMER A MAN OF INTEGRITY AND TRUTH,,,GOD BLESS HIM.

    • @fabiengerard8142
      @fabiengerard8142 Před 9 dny

      On Ukraine and Gaza, yes -- but not with it at all about China.

    • @Wilson24678
      @Wilson24678 Před 9 dny +2

      He might be sharp from US POV, but fundamentally, his beliefs align with US imperialism. Some ppl from US former colonies might like him, cause his idea might bring the master back.

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny

      Russian bot ----- please. Gag me.

    • @mizzypoo4827
      @mizzypoo4827 Před 6 dny

      WARP view of INTEGRITY...?🤨
      Shouldn’t INTEGRITY include an UNBIASED opinion/view of Global GEOPOLITICAL... seems JM has a blind spot/loyalty in KEEPING HEGEMONY of USA & to maintain USA IMPERIALISM regardless...to the point of starting ANOTHER WAR..(which it no longer can afford) BUT only this time, China are on a Military Technological level playing field...🙄 🙄

  • @elwoodgroves7848
    @elwoodgroves7848 Před měsícem +20

    Bravo for Dr. Mearsheimer for his courageous expose of the Israel lobby. His books and public statements have done much to document the power of the Israel lobby in American politics and the government of the United States. He is to be commended!

  • @PIANOSEEDS
    @PIANOSEEDS Před 9 dny +47

    John Mearsheimer is the man for the moment. Finally after years of scholarship and analysis of world events, he's come into his own through podcasts and alternative media. He's great. And your conversation with him is one of the best. Thank you, Gita Wirjawan.

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny

      ANOTHER russian bot. unbelievable

    • @PIANOSEEDS
      @PIANOSEEDS Před 7 dny

      @@cheponis Hahahahahaha. Yep.

    • @kumstuke
      @kumstuke Před 6 dny

      ​@@cheponiswhere?

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 6 dny

      @@kumstuke There. Right there.

    • @kumstuke
      @kumstuke Před 6 dny

      @@cheponis good camouflage, still couldn't see it

  • @itssanti
    @itssanti Před 9 dny +22

    At the beginning I was not fond of Mersheimer view, but he proved me wrong so many times, that couldn't help but to study his view with more attention and curiosity. He's been right on every single issue he talked about regarding international affairs. He's one of a kind, respects.

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny

      Marshmellow is a moron and Russian apologist. Why to people give him the time of day?

  • @wangjim5839
    @wangjim5839 Před měsícem +135

    The sad thing about wars is that those who start or instigate a war are never in or even near the battle field themselves.

    • @devianadkar7969
      @devianadkar7969 Před měsícem

      Yes and those who go to war are not brave men and women fighting for their country. They are paid assasins fighting fir a few powerful individuals.

    • @markusmaximus629
      @markusmaximus629 Před 29 dny +2

      never

    • @benitopepolini1249
      @benitopepolini1249 Před 29 dny +2

      Zelensky was near the front plenty of times 😂

    • @RennyChan
      @RennyChan Před 29 dny +4

      This is the biggest issue with modern warfare and our current politcal leaders. In the past, when there were kings and queens as leaders, they went to war and their entire families were on the front lines fighting and defending civilians. That entire equation has changed, what we have now is a system where our world leaders never have to put their lives on the line. They sit from afar and press a button and people die. There is a complete imbalance in what war entails and what is risked by those who call for war.

    • @thewedge8823
      @thewedge8823 Před 29 dny

      not true. Stalin's son was captured by the Nazis.... The Nazi's tried to exchange him, but his son was too low ranking for the Nazi that Russia had captured. Imagine that!! He said no to his own son.. How's that for nepotism?

  • @LouisWaweru
    @LouisWaweru Před měsícem +507

    When Witjawan says Indonesia dealt with multipolarity in a good way, he seems to completely ignore the CIA coup that installed Suharto and wiped out millions of his citizens for supporting neutrality.
    In fact, I don’t think I’ve ever seen him deal with this issue on the show, which makes the constant passive agreement anti-Sino remarks locate his loyalty in Washington rather than Southeast Asia.
    Good interview though. He got Mearsheimer to clearly illustrate the most key points on all of the issues.

    • @bernardiaVEVO
      @bernardiaVEVO Před měsícem +55

      The smartest comment I found here. 🎉

    • @jillesdjon
      @jillesdjon Před měsícem +39

      Excellent observation 👌🏽

    • @richiesd1
      @richiesd1 Před měsícem +22

      So true

    • @richiesd1
      @richiesd1 Před měsícem

      Many who were educated in the west have a western bias. Prisoner of colonial mentality.

    • @alexmae2300
      @alexmae2300 Před měsícem +28

      You hope someone whose life is connected to USA will be against it ?

  • @himusardar8329
    @himusardar8329 Před 5 dny +4

    It takes gut to talk against a powerful enemy like AIPAC . Thank you professor.

  • @shelbs4life589
    @shelbs4life589 Před 10 dny +4

    John is so knowledgeable and is easy to listen to and understand. I could listen to him for hours.

  • @CHIPIONES
    @CHIPIONES Před měsícem +330

    If I hear Dr. Mearsheimer I cannot stop listening. He is really a smart and an erudite man! Tks a lot fof this interesting interview 👏👏👏

    • @youssefelmrabet7033
      @youssefelmrabet7033 Před měsícem +10

      the same.

    • @zetristan4525
      @zetristan4525 Před měsícem +2

      He's in the catbird seat

    • @UB2K
      @UB2K Před měsícem

      John is worthless no life living spreading conspiracy go and touch grass

    • @user-cu9tp8dp1p
      @user-cu9tp8dp1p Před měsícem +4

      Dem möchte ich mich gerne anschließen - habe bereits 2007 ,Die Israel Lobby' gelesen und bin hoch erfreut. dass diesem Mann, die Aufmerksamkeit zuteil wird, die ihm zusteht. Wenn unsere Politiker nur einen Bruchteil der Übersicht. der Ahnung, des Wissens besäßen, die Hern Maersheimers auszeichnet, wäre schon einiges gewonnen. Mehr Maersheimer - jederzeit immer gerne. Danke für dieses Interview.

    • @RoEl-od9hl
      @RoEl-od9hl Před měsícem +6

      Keep hearing John talk about how much superior Russia is, 10x more artillery, Russia Air Force vs no Air Force, manpower advantage, industrial advantage.. so why haven’t they won yet? Been hearing this for 2 years now

  • @bheamla
    @bheamla Před měsícem +89

    One of the best interviews of Professor Mearsheimer. Thanks to the gentleman who is conducting the interview. He knows how to interview without any provocation and interruption.

    • @daseokamenis
      @daseokamenis Před 22 dny

      Zionist🤢🤢🤢

    • @motivationultra01
      @motivationultra01 Před 16 dny +1

      Yea he is better than Teers Mongor!😂

    • @aleejones7508
      @aleejones7508 Před 9 dny

      even when his guest is full of misinformation and inaccurate research. Personally I like truth not biased inaccurate facts

    • @maxxter90
      @maxxter90 Před 5 dny

      @@aleejones7508 you must be delusional saying that from your arm couch... just read the guest's credentials..

  • @successcollege4283
    @successcollege4283 Před měsícem +25

    감사합니다.

    • @gwirjawan
      @gwirjawan  Před 19 dny +1

      지원해줘서 고마워 🙏

  • @justactonfact
    @justactonfact Před 12 dny +21

    So much respect for him and his courage

  • @looseshoulderssumali7311
    @looseshoulderssumali7311 Před měsícem +119

    "...be intellectually curious in the extreme..." Now that's a good thing to live by.

    • @niCEwan
      @niCEwan Před měsícem +5

      Agreed

    • @leonardo__dicaprio
      @leonardo__dicaprio Před měsícem +1

      Who said the quote?

    • @marrks
      @marrks Před měsícem

      @@leonardo__dicapriowatch the video

    • @MenelikAlkebulan
      @MenelikAlkebulan Před 25 dny +1

      Probably that’s his advice to young people. (Just started watching )

  • @fajar_siswandaru
    @fajar_siswandaru Před měsícem +111

    And one of the reasons that the United States usually obeys the rules is that we wrote the rules, and if a situation arises where we don't like the rules, we disobey the rules or rewrite them. That's the way international politics works. 1:11:00

    • @pr0newbie
      @pr0newbie Před měsícem +3

      It's called Rules-based order vs International Law. The US doesn't abide by international law.

    • @josephsilkstone7535
      @josephsilkstone7535 Před měsícem +2

      ⁠@@pr0newbieUSA don’t abide by its own domestic humanitarian law. That’s scary.

    • @fajar_siswandaru
      @fajar_siswandaru Před měsícem +1

      My rule based order

    • @jameslum8822
      @jameslum8822 Před měsícem +7

      If you ignore the rules you wrote, then don't expect any other to adhere to it or respect you. In fact many will view you in contempt. That's what's facing US.

    • @m.m.502
      @m.m.502 Před 6 dny +1

      ​@@jameslum8822and who should hold USA in contempt? Who is powerful enough to hold USA in check and accountable for behaving like hypocrites 🤷‍♀️

  • @matrixemperor36
    @matrixemperor36 Před 28 dny +5

    Thank you Prof. Meirsheimer. You are a great American hero and a gift to humanity.

  • @crisisbliss2462
    @crisisbliss2462 Před měsícem +49

    the question that has not been answered as of 36 minutes is if AIPAC has to lobby for things, how does AIPAC hold so much power over US politicians that they "fear" for their jobs if they don't capitulate to them? Who are the people that make up AIPAC?

    • @BigMu365
      @BigMu365 Před 10 dny

      it is by exploiting them video tap them with sex tapes with minors etc ... Epstein case is best example

    • @kairo007
      @kairo007 Před 9 dny

      I think AIPAC is low key a blackmail ring; its the only explanation I can think of. Especially since the Epstien case revealed that many top officials had ties to Jeff and that Jeff also had ties to the Mossad.

    • @PIANOSEEDS
      @PIANOSEEDS Před 9 dny

      AIPAC is the mossad by another name...also known as blackmail.

    • @_TheMax_
      @_TheMax_ Před 8 dny

      AIPAC is just a fairy tale, the real masters are behind money printing mechanism.

    • @user-yg6rp1ou1u
      @user-yg6rp1ou1u Před 8 dny +1

      Leave that question.

  • @libertarianbydefault
    @libertarianbydefault Před měsícem +55

    I am so delighted the way Professor addressed the ludicrous "win the peace" argument of Kotkin who clearly was delusional when he rambled about it in a previous program. The exclusion of Russia and Russian interests is a recipe for war. It has been the case in 2022 and it will continue being the case until someone wakes up and gets the balls to negotiate for real.

    • @Mesamedusa
      @Mesamedusa Před měsícem +1

      Lose/Win the war/the peace is a framework for looking at things and understanding them. It is not an argument.
      JM had no trouble expressing his own (grim) views within this framework, demonstrating it's validity.

    • @ajtexas1100
      @ajtexas1100 Před měsícem +2

      Kotkin is a fraud, i don't get what people admire about him.

    • @dangin8811
      @dangin8811 Před 29 dny +2

      ​@@ajtexas1100He possesses a sort of scholarly charisma that is uncommon by academics. But youre right, he is ideologically blinkered and has various 'simpleton' moments.

    • @Mesamedusa
      @Mesamedusa Před 29 dny +1

      @@dangin8811
      Could you pin such a moment?

    • @ajtexas1100
      @ajtexas1100 Před 28 dny

      @@dangin8811 Charisma ? I don't see it, and don't care about it when it comes to historarians.
      If i want to learn about the history of a country, i don't want to read again the white/western version/vision that we're told about again and again. I read local historians.
      How on earth can people believe the history of Russia or China written by AngloSaxon people ? Pure nonsense.

  • @astfgl1265
    @astfgl1265 Před měsícem +79

    It is such a pleasure to listen to Prof. Mearsheimer. Great conversation, thank you both!

    • @ruudgreat9810
      @ruudgreat9810 Před 22 dny

      Thanks to .....USA elites, despite all non proliferation, Pakistan got nucleair weapons and missiles. The US is the most dangerous country in the world whch showed many times that it is impossible to hold it serious for any agreements..

    • @daseokamenis
      @daseokamenis Před 22 dny

      Zionist 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢

  • @acommon1
    @acommon1 Před měsícem +4

    Total John Mearsheimer Fan & Follower!!! Realist Rock! Thanks 🙏🏽 you having a true statesman on your show.
    I plan to read up on your materials too

  • @CharlesDogworth
    @CharlesDogworth Před 16 dny +2

    Best interview of John Mearsheimer ive seen. Interviewer did an outstanding job, and John really captured some important perspectives. 👍👍

  • @fjordhellas4077
    @fjordhellas4077 Před měsícem +78

    Professor Mearsheimer is one of the most respected intellectuals, historians, geopoliticians in the U.S and the world! He’s among our most notable thinkers and visionaries just as Professors Noam Chomsky, Jeffery Sachs, Stephen Walt, Norman Finkelstein, Stephen F Cohen …

    • @user-cg1qq2er8x
      @user-cg1qq2er8x Před měsícem

      Finkelstein is an abject fraud and moron. Chomsky is brilliant but a zealot with a personality disorder. Sachs is a lightweight. Stephen F. Cohen was a brilliant man. Mearsh. is a knock off of Cohen and not a very good one. Mearsh is only right about Ukraine.

    • @YourFavouriteiA
      @YourFavouriteiA Před 26 dny +4

      Named only jews like there are not american professors.

    • @GreyElder
      @GreyElder Před 26 dny +2

      I personally prefer Professor Sachs hands down .

    • @oceanlambert3325
      @oceanlambert3325 Před 15 dny

      ​@@GreyElderabsolutely. He is all the theories ! He has a severe lacking of understanding of the history of China & the Chinese ; so typical of the academics!

    • @victordobin5918
      @victordobin5918 Před 14 dny +1

      He knows nothing regarding the situation on the ground. He would have to come from the Eastern Europe to understand and comprehend what's going on on battlefield.

  • @discoverer7175
    @discoverer7175 Před měsícem +29

    I think this debate would be a lot fairer and unbiased toward China if Professor Jeffery Sachs and Kishore Mahbubani are also invited. Their opinions would be significantly different from Professor Mearsheimer and that of the moderator.

    • @echozhang4486
      @echozhang4486 Před měsícem

      I think one flaw in Professor Mearsheimer’s theory is that he assumes China will rise and becomes another hegemony like America even though China has been saying no we just want to rise peacefully and peacefully co-exist with other countries, including the neighboring countries.

    • @jameslum8822
      @jameslum8822 Před měsícem

      The moderator has barrowed himself in the US anthill and is naturally biased against China.

    • @gaslitworldf.melissab2897
      @gaslitworldf.melissab2897 Před 7 dny +1

      Fairness does not come alone by introducing opposition. It comes only when those in discussion are willing to cede to someone else for having a valid point of view. Pro-Chinese advocates do not go along with that kind of discourse. It's _all_ CCP or PLA or nothing. Whenever one critiques the CCP, those two entities call it racism. They insist that the party, the army and the people are all one entity.

    • @jaixzz
      @jaixzz Před 7 dny

      ​@@gaslitworldf.melissab2897very nuch agree yours is the comment-scape today

    • @MY-bc3qq
      @MY-bc3qq Před 4 dny +1

      @@gaslitworldf.melissab2897 on the other hand you have the people who mix the nation, the party in power, and the civilians as in one entity. It happens both ways, people who are pro-china, and people who are anti-china. Prof Mearsheimer is so far the only one I find who's not taking a side in his logic.

  • @successcollege4283
    @successcollege4283 Před měsícem +4

    Thank you.
    Love & Respect from Seoul Korea

  • @halifaxeh
    @halifaxeh Před měsícem +6

    Great interview! Very informative! Wish I could take a whole class from Prof Mearsheimer!

  • @reginaldpoofta5
    @reginaldpoofta5 Před měsícem +132

    professor Mearsheimer is the national treasure.

    • @PhiloSurfer
      @PhiloSurfer Před měsícem +5

      To the global majority, Prof is a national treasure.
      To the MIC, the US regime and the media, Prof is a traitor, and is shunned and ostracized.

    • @roccos2311
      @roccos2311 Před měsícem +4

      Don’t tell Nicholas cage

    • @UB2K
      @UB2K Před měsícem +4

      He’s absolutely worthless spreading conspiracy theories

    • @user-xp5id1kh4r
      @user-xp5id1kh4r Před měsícem +1

      No he's not, lol. Half of his life's work was proven wrong when Russia invaded Ukraine. The only reason why his name is even known is because his theories fit the pro-Rus propagandistic narrative.

    • @Mesamedusa
      @Mesamedusa Před měsícem +3

      @@UB2K
      Point to a theory and where can I here him talking about it?
      Be precise.

  • @eddiefu3727
    @eddiefu3727 Před měsícem +83

    Thank you Projessor Mearsheimer

    • @paulheydarian1281
      @paulheydarian1281 Před měsícem

      What's a projessor? 🤔😁

    • @BallyBoy95
      @BallyBoy95 Před měsícem +1

      @@paulheydarian1281 spelling mistake

    • @user-cu9tp8dp1p
      @user-cu9tp8dp1p Před měsícem +2

      Dieses Interview sollte Pflichtlektüre für die deutsche Bundesregierung sein. Diese kann meinetwegen weiterhin der Meinung sein. dass Israel kein Apartheid Staat ist. Ich selbst bin da voll auf der Seite von Prof. Maersheimer.

    • @halifaxeh
      @halifaxeh Před měsícem +1

      @@user-cu9tp8dp1pIsrael is not an apartheid state?! Did you sleep through that part?

    • @halifaxeh
      @halifaxeh Před měsícem

      @@paulheydarian1281you’ve never made a spelling mistake, eh? So obnoxious.

  • @richardhausig9493
    @richardhausig9493 Před měsícem +4

    Gita does good stuff. Great guests and he asks good questions.

  • @haroldoluizrodriguesfilho7779
    @haroldoluizrodriguesfilho7779 Před měsícem +4

    Thanks for your considerations , the World needs to pay attention in your words and thoughts

  • @LeonEdwards-lt1bn
    @LeonEdwards-lt1bn Před měsícem +18

    Thank you Professor Mearsheimer

  • @JhonJhoni-py6vc
    @JhonJhoni-py6vc Před měsícem +157

    Great prof. Gita..l am listening from Australia..

    • @hassu2149
      @hassu2149 Před měsícem

      What are your opinions on USA

    • @underblackflag3335
      @underblackflag3335 Před měsícem +1

      @@hassu2149 USA is great

    • @ajtexas1100
      @ajtexas1100 Před měsícem

      @@underblackflag3335 No it's not great at all.

    • @ewilson0223
      @ewilson0223 Před měsícem

      ​@@ajtexas1100great is an understatement. 😊

  • @cresenciashamsoddin2942
    @cresenciashamsoddin2942 Před měsícem +2

    Great man with Reason and wisdom John Mearshiemer truth Matters to the whole world your voice Echo and heard by the righteous people around the world

  • @katsukikatsunori5107
    @katsukikatsunori5107 Před 7 dny

    It is truly an intellectually stimulating creative pleasure to attend Professor Mearsheimer's lectures. I feel that Prof. Mearsheimer is asking us the question, “Is there a solution to the problem of how to deal with the monster that is growing bigger and bigger with resentment and rage? 
    I feel that Professor Mearsheimer is sounding the alarm that such a problem is materializing without our knowledge.

  • @hAI_2024
    @hAI_2024 Před měsícem +41

    I'm glad to see this man again and listen to his intriguing opinions about global geopolitical. Thanks, John. Stay healthy always.

    • @bassocantante51
      @bassocantante51 Před měsícem +1

      Judge Napolitano has him on his show every week

    • @lebladful
      @lebladful Před měsícem

      "The Congress is Israëli Occupied territory" Pat Buchanan
      Bring AIPAC to justice for legalizing corruption, instead of improving people's lives,education and healthcare

    • @JH-pt6ih
      @JH-pt6ih Před měsícem

      @@lebladful Pat Buchanan - Trump 1.0 from the 90s.

  • @kunfayakun10
    @kunfayakun10 Před měsícem +17

    Tiap kali buka YT, headline algoritma YT saya isinya konten pak gita, sebegitu seringnya hampir tiap hari saya menonton end game 😅. Terima kasih pak gita atas tontonan gratisnya dan sehat selalu🙏

  • @adonixp
    @adonixp Před měsícem +2

    I love listening to Dr Mearsheimer

  • @margaritadubrovina7063
    @margaritadubrovina7063 Před měsícem +3

    Appreciate the thought and insight on this matter

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny

      What? The dude is a Russian stooge! Total idiot.

  • @audrajones
    @audrajones Před měsícem +25

    Oh Mearsheimer, how wonderful you are.

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny +1

      Say it, Russian bot!

  • @asthadwivedi6749
    @asthadwivedi6749 Před měsícem +12

    Thankyou so much for bringing this great man again.

  • @micky_d_designer4743
    @micky_d_designer4743 Před 10 dny +2

    This man is a real teacher. I wish he taught me in the university

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny

      Why, do you like learning how a real Russian useful idiot behaves?

  • @hswilly236
    @hswilly236 Před měsícem +2

    salute dengan Anda Pak Gita bisa mengundang akademisi dunia tentang power politics Dr. Mearsheimer, terima kasih Pak!

  • @MC-1976Mei
    @MC-1976Mei Před měsícem +36

    Sometimes it's best to walk away with your losses and not lose it all.

    • @victordobin5918
      @victordobin5918 Před 14 dny

      Show us and walk away from you home and your community!!....

  • @metugeekane8454
    @metugeekane8454 Před měsícem +121

    People think of Mearsheimer as an academic, but Mearsheimer is also a soldier, which makes his analyses quite intriguing.

    • @robhaythorne4464
      @robhaythorne4464 Před měsícem +12

      Mearsheimer was an Air Force Lieutenant who served five years in a Los Angeles office. He couldn't wait to shed his uniform.

    • @Roberto-de8xv
      @Roberto-de8xv Před měsícem +4

      ​​@@robhaythorne4464Your post history is smearing John as a supporter of Russia. My man the world, particularly geopolitics, is not binary. If you were going to accuse him of a bias it would be anti-Soviet/Russia if you've read any of his literature. If someone observes country X has an advantage over country Y in a war, it doesn't mean the observer is biased towards country X. *You'd probably agree China has an advantage over Tawain. Does that mean you support China for acknowledging that advantage? Of course not.

    • @Truthorfib
      @Truthorfib Před měsícem +2

      @@Roberto-de8xvChina has an economic advantage over the US and have stopped buying US bonds. Hence the Treasury Secretary went to China out if panic 😂

    • @Truthorfib
      @Truthorfib Před měsícem

      @@Roberto-de8xvthe US Dollar though is still a major trump card the US has. But as soon as the BRICS currency is implemented the US economy is going to implode

    • @MaskedUpActivities
      @MaskedUpActivities Před měsícem

      @@Truthorfibare you drunk? China is an a economic pooper they lost 90% of foreign investment the Chinese economy is literally about to collapse 😂😂😂the property market has fell too

  • @JayaMadhavadas
    @JayaMadhavadas Před 10 dny +1

    THIS IS BRILLIANT-THANK YOU -

  • @johnconstable1715
    @johnconstable1715 Před měsícem +9

    His voice is being heard in Australia

  • @harisk6733
    @harisk6733 Před měsícem +21

    Terima kasih banyak Pak Gita sudah mengundang kembali Prof. Mearsheimer. Saya salah satu pelajar yang mengidolakan beliau karena pandangan beliau terhadap isu-isu internasional. Melihat situasi Israel-Palestina yang memanas, saya sangat menantikan pendapat beliau mengenai hal tersebut. Alhamdulillahnya, Pak Gita menghadirkan beliau di Endgame. Luar biasa!

  • @rajatshrma3
    @rajatshrma3 Před měsícem +2

    Professor is a True Legend.

  • @GMATveteran
    @GMATveteran Před měsícem +8

    19:00 - Vietnam is hardly an "ardent supporter" of the US; it's simply pragmatic & realistic enough to stay equidistant between the US & PRC, so as to maintain its own independence, & play big powers off against one another for its own benefit.

    • @huberthumphry280
      @huberthumphry280 Před 10 dny

      even though I would agree with the "pragmatic" description and not so much "ardent supporter", you got who they are balancing seriously wrong. It isn't with the PRC which literally had its last war in 1979 as Mershimer notes, with Vietnam, plus the Paracels dispute, plus the Spratlys. Vietnam gets no military aid from China, it gets it from Russia, that is who they are balancing.
      It is clear that ardent supporter is an exaggeration since Vietnam has expressed neutrality in Russia's conflict in Ukraine but also refused to condemn the invasion at the UN. But Vietnam has been getting US arms deliveries, most importantly warships

  • @johnstack5008
    @johnstack5008 Před měsícem +32

    I'm amazed how sharp the professor is at 76 years old.

    • @paulheydarian1281
      @paulheydarian1281 Před měsícem +17

      Thankfully not everyone ages like Joe Biden. 😅

    • @halifaxeh
      @halifaxeh Před měsícem +5

      That’s a rather ageist comment! Most people don’t have dementia in their 70s.

    • @brianbutler3318
      @brianbutler3318 Před měsícem

      Not fair to compare really smart people with average IQ people

    • @lisabahouth8893
      @lisabahouth8893 Před měsícem

      Unbelievably ageist comment.

    • @user-kz8my6kf3w
      @user-kz8my6kf3w Před 29 dny +1

      Makes Biden look 139. Guy is a disgraceful. The people shoving him in front of crowds is just utter cruelty. The guys suffering and being belittled through no fault of his own. Another term. The people around him should be arrested. It’s utterly humiliating to watch him. This guy is sharp as a tack. A total pleasure to listen to.

  • @ihsanrachid8763
    @ihsanrachid8763 Před měsícem +42

    As noted in Haaretz, Netanyahu seems to boast of his knowledge of the US by saying, "I know what America is. America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won't get in their way."
    He also boasts of manipulating the U.S. in the ongoing peace process, as the Washington Post points out:
    "They asked me before the election if I'd honor [the Oslo accords]," he said. "I said I would, but ... I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue."
    America, apparently, is moved by the Israel lobby. Evidence to the contrary has yet to emerge.

    • @solneeman518
      @solneeman518 Před měsícem +1

      If you move to. Gaza for a while, you will change your mind.

    • @irisheyes5890
      @irisheyes5890 Před 11 dny +1

      We even let him speak on the floor of our Congress!!

    • @alexgarcia7643
      @alexgarcia7643 Před 7 dny +1

      @@solneeman518there was a christian churches with Christians in gaza, yet they continued to live there. Your point is mute.

    • @gaslitworldf.melissab2897
      @gaslitworldf.melissab2897 Před 7 dny +1

      It saddens me that these are the kinds of people who don't get into politics. They know too much about how things work to want to waste their time. At best, they'll serve as consultants, but never throw their hats into the running for a seat. They know it's a losing proposition.

  • @hasmikghazaryan9914
    @hasmikghazaryan9914 Před měsícem +1

    Thank you for your great conversation!

  • @bigtuna45
    @bigtuna45 Před měsícem +2

    I have to say I love the final discussion about the Hubris-Humility index, this concept allows anyone no matter their age to be mentally agile. Also you can tell he's from New York, he pronounces the word "Idea" as "Idear", reminds me of all of my relatives that do this.

  • @wagnerbotelha6301
    @wagnerbotelha6301 Před měsícem +4

    Excellent interview. Greetings from São Paulo, Brazil.

  • @suleimanjarara5379
    @suleimanjarara5379 Před měsícem +17

    Thank you gentlemen for a great interview.I appreciate your time and thoughtful talk. It was a pleasure listening to you.

  • @S3LFSOVR3IGN
    @S3LFSOVR3IGN Před 14 dny

    One of the BEST INTERVIEWS you can find on CZcams. Amazing Channel and interviewer! You can tell Mr. Mearsheimer enjoyed it as much as we have... props to you. If that's the Indonesian way of speaking i wanna be Indonesian!

  • @Momowowo8
    @Momowowo8 Před 8 dny

    one of the best podcasts i have listened to. always very inspiring to listen to Prof Mearsheimer!

  • @zhuoli2139
    @zhuoli2139 Před měsícem +13

    Amen to the hubris-humility part

  • @hannahlouisefitzpatrick6742
    @hannahlouisefitzpatrick6742 Před měsícem +7

    Thank-you for this wonderful conversation!

    • @cheponis
      @cheponis Před 7 dny

      Yes, just what we need, more Russian bots cluttering up YT

  • @elwoodgroves7848
    @elwoodgroves7848 Před měsícem +1

    Thank you, Mr. Gita! An excellent interview!!!

  • @sunshine-vd9jl
    @sunshine-vd9jl Před 23 dny

    Title got me interested and this conversation got me subbed. I look forward to watching the rest of your videos. Best wishes for you and your channel.

  • @LP-zr4iq
    @LP-zr4iq Před měsícem +6

    so beautiful to listen to these carefully spoken words, thank you!

  • @anthonyfx100
    @anthonyfx100 Před měsícem +40

    Good dialogue but Gita disappoints in not pushing back on John’s well known hawkish views about China’s potential aims in East Asia, I think.

    • @Justin87878
      @Justin87878 Před měsícem +4

      Agreed! like other commenters said.

    • @wawanhermawan-sz7gl
      @wawanhermawan-sz7gl Před měsícem +6

      it's not gita's style to push or challenge his guest, he always lets his guest offers their views without being confronted.
      for example, 42:00 gita is correct that zionism was not meant to commit genocide, but john wrongly stated that they know from the start they're going to cleanse the palestinian because they couldnt have established a jewish state among palestinians. well, zionism started in late 19th century was to find homeland for the jews, not to establish a jewish state, therefore it's possible to live side by side as long as they're not praticing apartheid as in the original zionism. first generation of aliyah among zionists in 19th century was relatively peaceful, things gotten worse only since balfour declaration and jewish businessmen (rothschild etc) who bought many lands etc.
      but then, gita didn't try to debate john either though i think he knows john was wrong here.

    • @casteretpollux
      @casteretpollux Před měsícem

      ​@@wawanhermawan-sz7glThe British army trained up genocidal Zionist forces in the 30s and they were unleashed in the 48 Nakba slaughter and eviction of a substantial part of the population. They have continued step by step since then.

    • @shelonnikgrumantov5061
      @shelonnikgrumantov5061 Před měsícem +11

      @@wawanhermawan-sz7glI’d say, the idea that Jews could live peacefully among Arabs and under the Turkish rule was either totally naive and delusional (which would be strange for such a clever nation) or disguising the real goals. If you want to have Jews settling and living en masse while surrounded by Arabs, you need to carve out a state for them - I suspect, Jews realized this from the beginning just at the initial stages did not proclaim this openly for the obvious reasons.

    • @fasha7747
      @fasha7747 Před měsícem +3

      ​@@shelonnikgrumantov5061You don't understand Judaism. Jews back then didn't have the idea that there should be a 'Jewish state,' at least until the Messiah comes according to their beliefs. In fact, it's prohibited.
      Traditional Jewish belief holds that the establishment of a Jewish state is linked to the arrival of the Messiah and the Messianic age.

  • @almapraxeda6049
    @almapraxeda6049 Před měsícem +2

    Dank an Sie beide aus Deutschland für diese umfassenden Analysen der Weltbeschaffenheit.

  • @anonymousWombat3
    @anonymousWombat3 Před měsícem +1

    Mearsheimer makes a lot of good points. Great discussion

  • @oswarz
    @oswarz Před měsícem +26

    Would you please give an example of where China is trying to rewrite the rules?

    • @ChrisZ901
      @ChrisZ901 Před měsícem

      China has been advocating international law based order instead of the (US/Western) rule based order which has been used by US and her allies to attack China. China does not want to be ruled by those laws which in the US's book is rewriting the rules

    • @lyq232
      @lyq232 Před měsícem +4

      Not yet, because they're not powerful enough to do it just yet.
      China would love it if they could repeal EEZ and lau absolute claim over South China Sea

    • @UrMediaIsFake
      @UrMediaIsFake Před měsícem

      China is not trying to rewrite rules at all, it just wants to be equal and not be ruled by foreign white imperial power. Most of Asia is the same except they are too weak to resist. This is what he means by "threat", you and I would see it as threat but these global empire fanatics think they own the world and any country can't rule over is considered a "threat"

    • @MrSilv55
      @MrSilv55 Před 20 dny

      You forget that China Has hypersonic missiles that can sink all the US warships.

  • @dev5392
    @dev5392 Před měsícem +50

    Professor is a knowledgeable man and has been telling us this for years this was all predictable

    • @vkerametlian3
      @vkerametlian3 Před měsícem +4

      You are correct

    • @GaryGraham-sx4pm
      @GaryGraham-sx4pm Před měsícem +1

      @@vkerametlian3 the professor is a defeatist, appeasement with a belligerent adversary never ends well

  • @edwinrenaud2002
    @edwinrenaud2002 Před 7 dny

    Wonderful conversation!

  • @amiruddinmagga1505
    @amiruddinmagga1505 Před 4 dny +3

    Dari sini kita paham bahwa PBB tidak akan berbicara banyak tentang genosida di gaza, hal yang menyedihkan untuk kita ketahui bersama di era sekarang. 😢😢😢

  • @osamuikeda3953
    @osamuikeda3953 Před měsícem +17

    Survival of the fittest doesn't necessarily come through raw strength. Offering mutually beneficial relationships can be a source of real power.

    • @jacobjorgenson9285
      @jacobjorgenson9285 Před měsícem

      That’s how China has moved 500 million people out of poverty the last 30 years without fighting a single war

    • @foxyr4bbit
      @foxyr4bbit Před 16 hodinami

      i think this is what mearsheimer gets wrong in that he views power through the individualist / liberal ideology

  • @BindasBadshah
    @BindasBadshah Před měsícem +8

    Wonderful discussion..

  • @RangKlos
    @RangKlos Před 11 dny

    Such a complete wisdom. My admiration goes to the interviewer too.

  • @redice_1183
    @redice_1183 Před 7 dny

    God bless you for telling the truth

  • @Jean-rg4sp
    @Jean-rg4sp Před měsícem +69

    *John Mearsheimer is easy to understand and he appears to be correct in his assessment of international relations.*

    • @zetristan4525
      @zetristan4525 Před měsícem +4

      That's a bold assessment.

    • @Jean-rg4sp
      @Jean-rg4sp Před měsícem +1

      @@zetristan4525 Thank you for noticing my comment.

    • @j.sarnak1391
      @j.sarnak1391 Před měsícem +9

      Really how is his assessment of China's intentions any different from US foreign policy?? China has not attacked anyone in this century. They are building a defense against the Empire of lies. Think about the prosperity China has brought to other countries without forcing regime change on them.

    • @zetristan4525
      @zetristan4525 Před měsícem

      @@j.sarnak1391 What is your (differing) assessment of how China will proceed, proactively, in the South China Sea, in the decade ahead?

    • @Jean-rg4sp
      @Jean-rg4sp Před měsícem +2

      @@j.sarnak1391 I agree with you and I heard John Mearsheimer say the same.

  • @Mmzk155
    @Mmzk155 Před měsícem +9

    Ini temubual kedua dengan Prof. Mearsheimer. Syabas kepada Gita Wijawan

  • @Sams_Uncle
    @Sams_Uncle Před měsícem +1

    What a beautiful, sane and logically sound conversation! Even though, I disagree with them on Israel issue, that’s why more wise dialogues are needed. Thank you 🙏

  • @mouradbsiri3822
    @mouradbsiri3822 Před měsícem +1

    John is the founder in Geopolics of a School of Thought '' Pragmatism'', based on a deep understanding of the various forces in presence with a rogourous evaluation of their main assets (Vision, Military, Economy, Energy,,..). He proved to be right on several occasions .He remains for viewers a great source of a credible Info in Geopolitics.

  • @tedwong7037
    @tedwong7037 Před měsícem +52

    john mearsheimer’s point of view based on the prediction that China is going to walk through the road exactly like how America did when it became a superpower, but he kinda ignored the history path of the chinese civilization, Chinese are just not the same like the Anglos. Chinese never had those colonial mentality, if they do, SEA are full of small countries, it should be easy for a elephant like China to manipulate those small states and exploit them, but on the other hand, China has only been building up economic connections and do more business with them.

    • @Joaocruz30
      @Joaocruz30 Před 27 dny +1

      You said it ALL! greetings from Portugal!

    • @sholrothaegis3125
      @sholrothaegis3125 Před 23 dny +2

      you might want to take a look at the history of china how it grows then you would know that what you say might not be concurrently true...

    • @Joaocruz30
      @Joaocruz30 Před 21 dnem +1

      @@sholrothaegis3125 that statement is a fair one if already known the future. We cannot accept the fact that we don't like the political values of a country but you cannot judge their future actions just by not liking them! We see their true colours by their actions and not by their words. If so then the austrian painter with a moustache was a great man...

    • @chenqin415
      @chenqin415 Před 20 dny +3

      This is extremely foolish and ignorant of China's history. During the cultural revolution for example, China export its marxist revolutionary teachings to many countries, provide training and arms to native armed groups (thus they are known as maoist revolutionaries), host radio stations within China itself for these maoist forces. For example, the Communist Party of Malaya which fought an insurgency against Malaysia's government has its radio station in hunan China.
      This only come to an end when Mao died and Deng took over. He decide that China should build economic ties instead of export marxist revolution and ordered these forces to step down. And they did.
      With the way China is going today, who knows if Xi will revive the cultural revolution again and build a cult of personality for himself?

  • @LordEdwards
    @LordEdwards Před měsícem +11

    Thanks for your honesty Mr. Mearshiemer

  • @nawafdreams
    @nawafdreams Před měsícem +1

    🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
    02:09: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ⚔️Russia regains momentum in Ukraine War
    - Russia launched a counteroffensive in June 2023 that failed to achieve its goals.
    05:20: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) Why Russia Has Artillery Advantage
    - Historically, Russia prioritized quantity over quality in weapons production.
    07:11: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ammo Russia's Advantage in Supplying Artillery Shells
    - Russia has a larger stockpile of artillery shells and an easier time producing more.
    09:33 *[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ☠️ Russia's Advantages in Manpower*
    - Russia has a larger population (5:1) to draw soldiers from than Ukraine.
    11:27: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) Ukraine's Challenges in Manpower
    - Ukraine struggles to replace lost soldiers due to casualties and draft dodging.
    12:51: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) Unrealistic Hope for Ukrainian Victory
    - Supplying Ukraine with enough arms to win the war is unlikely.
    15:08: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) 🇺🇦 Possible Ukrainian Territorial Losses in a Peace Deal
    - Russia is likely to keep Crimea and the 4 easternmost oblasts of Ukraine.
    16:37 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] Possible Impact of US Leadership on Ukraine-Russia Peace Deal*
    - Biden is unlikely to push Ukraine to accept a peace deal seen as a Russian victory.
    19:28 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] Possible Long-Term Outcomes of the Russia-Ukraine War*
    - A frozen conflict, similar to North and South Korea, is more likely than a peace agreement.
    21:27 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] Post-War Hostilities Between Russia, Ukraine, and the West*
    - A frozen conflict in Ukraine would likely lead to ongoing hostility between the parties involved.
    23:47 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] gap between public opinion and US foreign policy 🇮🇹*
    - US foreign policy may not reflect the views of the American public.
    23:47 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] 🇮🇹 Gap Between Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy*
    - US foreign policy may not reflect the views of the American public.
    26:05 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] US Public Opinion on the Ukraine War*
    - American public opinion on the likelihood of Ukraine winning the war is low.
    26:05 *[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] US Public Opinion on War and Foreign Policy*
    - The US public is less likely to oppose foreign wars when there's no draft.
    29:19 *[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] 🇮🇱 US Public Opinion on Israel-Palestine Conflict*
    30:12 *[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] US Policy on Israel and Gaza*
    32:11 *[invalid URL removed] US-Israel Lobby and Political Influence*
    35:22 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] Potential for Wider Conflict in the Middle East*
    37:14 *[[czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] Potential for US Involvement in Wider Conflict*
    37:40: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ❌ Two-State Solution for Israel-Palestine Conflict
    39:56: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) Possible Futures for Israel-Palestine
    [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html)] US Foreign Policy Priorities
    44:06: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) US Focus on Asia
    45:31: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) US Distraction from China
    47:17: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ️ China Wary of Conflict with US
    49:43: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) Potential for Conflict: South China Sea
    49:43: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ⚠️ South China Sea Conflict More Likely
    53:22: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) ⚖️ South China Sea: Difficult Path to Resolution
    54:49: [czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html](czcams.com/video/39_bpaaio1U/video.html) intervenir: US Involvement in the South China Sea
    55:44: [invalid URL removed]: What’s Behind Biden’s Blank Check Support for Israel? | Endgame #179 (Luminaries - CZcams) South China Sea More Likely Flashpoint Than Taiwan
    Nationalism and liberalism are the two most powerful ideologies in today's world.
    Nationalism is a powerful force that shapes interstate relations.
    Liberalism is an ideology that leads the United States and its allies to believe they have a right to promote democracy around the world.
    Liberalism prioritizes spreading democracy and acting on moral principles, even if it clashes with realist goals. (Crusader mentality)
    Realism emphasizes state survival as the primary objective in the international system.
    Realist logic trumps other logics, including economic logic, in most cases due to the primacy of survival.
    Realism prioritizes state survival above all else, including economic prosperity and moral goals.
    When realist logic clashes with economic or moral logic, realism prevails due to the existential importance of survival.
    This raises questions about the effectiveness of multilateral institutions like the UN, vastly outspent by military powers.
    Multilateral institutions are created and controlled by powerful states, not the other way around.
    These institutions cannot compel major powers like the US, Russia, or China to act against their interests.
    The US, for example, often benefits from the rules it sets for these institutions and can disregard them when needed.
    China, as a new great power, is following established patterns.
    China is creating its own institutions (e.g., Asian Development Bank) and rewriting rules in existing ones to reflect its greater power.
    This is how powerful states behave in the international system.
    A recent article by Eliza Gheorghe argues that multipolarity increases the risk of nuclear proliferation.
    Under a unipolar system, a single powerful state can more easily police proliferation.
    Bipolarity can also lead to less proliferation if superpowers cooperate (e.g., détente between the US and USSR).
    A multipolar world, especially one with intense security competition between major powers, is seen as the worst possible scenario for preventing nuclear proliferation.
    This is because cooperation among major powers is needed to effectively control proliferation, and such cooperation is less likely in a multipolar world with intense rivalries.
    The US-China competition is used as an example where such rivalry makes cooperation on issues like controlling North Korea's nuclear program difficult.
    John Mearsheimer emphasizes the importance of intellectual curiosity for anyone who wants to understand the world. This curiosity should extend to various aspects of life, including international politics.
    Students should actively seek out the ideas of prominent thinkers and critically evaluate those ideas, forming their own independent understanding of the world order.
    Mearsheimer views his role as providing frameworks for students to develop their own understanding of international relations, not offering definitive answers.
    Students should actively engage with these frameworks, critically evaluating them and potentially forming their own theories about how the world works.
    This applies to all aspects of life, not just international politics.
    John Mearsheimer emphasizes the importance of both intellectual boldness ("hubris") and the willingness to learn from others ("humility") for students of international relations.
    Students should have the confidence to develop their own theories ("hubris") but also be receptive to alternative perspectives and the possibility that they might be wrong ("humility").
    This "hubris-humility index" is a concept Mearsheimer developed with a colleague to emphasize this balance.
    Made with HARPA AI

  • @Pitonisa
    @Pitonisa Před měsícem +14

    Thank you both !
    From Brazil.

  • @dubu4016
    @dubu4016 Před měsícem +24

    Thanks Professor ❤

  • @gungadi1860
    @gungadi1860 Před měsícem +1

    Udah 2x Pak John Mearsheimer jadi narasumber Endgame & saya selalu suka bagaimana cara beliau menyikapi sesuatu dengan konsep realistis yang beliau gunakan. Meskipun beliau warga negara USA tapi bisa memberikan pandangan secara menyeluruh tidak hanya dari sudut pandang USA saja.

  • @SincereSentinel
    @SincereSentinel Před měsícem +1

    Great discussion gentlemen.

  • @sabinehahn9774
    @sabinehahn9774 Před měsícem +17

    "the Australians gonna defend Taiwan with us"? I wouldn't hold my breath on that one - the population is certainly not keen at all on doing so or being dragged by the US into another useless war, gonna be interesting if our government, whoever it may be at the time, is going to be able to force us.

    • @lyq232
      @lyq232 Před měsícem

      The government can always mobilise their armed forces without the consent of their civilians.
      Would that then be a political suicide for said ruling government? That's a different question

    • @glebskakovsky9475
      @glebskakovsky9475 Před měsícem

      The war with nuclear capable enemy...

    • @arifra2062
      @arifra2062 Před měsícem

      It doesn't matter what the population think, Australia is literally the lapdog of the US.

  • @yusufhidayat3149
    @yusufhidayat3149 Před měsícem +31

    Pak kalau boleh adakan dialog dengan Yanis Varoufakis

  • @UnleashNInspire
    @UnleashNInspire Před měsícem +2

    Amazing guest

  • @bittersweet4331
    @bittersweet4331 Před dnem

    The last 4 minutes was so precious❤

  • @GeoffreyZhao-cw8sq
    @GeoffreyZhao-cw8sq Před měsícem +3

    John Mearsheimer, what a human being!

  • @GloWinGlo
    @GloWinGlo Před měsícem +1

    As a citizen of the world, it is imperative to be intellectually curious so as to use critical thinking to contribute to making the world better through agency! ❤

  • @hisham1269
    @hisham1269 Před měsícem +9

    ‘The reason u need a lobby … is because there’s a lot of instances where isreal’s interests conflicts with American interests and lobby wants to go to great lengths to make sure isreal’s interests prevail’ wow, quite simple but never thought of it this way.

  • @jeankern2646
    @jeankern2646 Před měsícem +14

    Maersheimer wants more military bases around China? Now he completely lost me.

    • @glebskakovsky9475
      @glebskakovsky9475 Před měsícem

      Maersheimer is one of the most talanted enemy ideologists.

    • @fadhlmohamed2896
      @fadhlmohamed2896 Před 28 dny +2

      You missed the point he was describing and analyzing the geopolitical and military agenda of the USA not actually supporting it.

  • @Qiushishuo
    @Qiushishuo Před měsícem +96

    There are three miscalculation there about China.
    1. There is no trade are influenced in SCS.
    2. China will respond the contain strategy from US. No one likes repression.
    3. China is not US, who wants to grab all. China is fine with South east Asia for thousands of years.

    • @philipemerson473
      @philipemerson473 Před měsícem

      China is imploding all on its own.

    • @NoohCee
      @NoohCee Před měsícem +3

      Agree with you totally. But please improve your English, seriously.

    • @putrapratama-sq8hu
      @putrapratama-sq8hu Před měsícem

      Bullshit...
      There are three miscalculation there about China. (ULTIMATE BULLSHIT)
      1. There is no trade are influenced in SCS. ---------------------> YES THEY ARE $5.3 trillion worth of goods transits through the South China Sea annually
      2. China will respond the contain strategy from US. No one likes repression.---------------------------> GOOD LUCK FACING JAPAN AND INDIA (They Hate You)
      3. China is not US, who wants to grab all. China is fine with South east Asia for thousands of years.--------------------------------> LIKE YOU STEAL FILIPINO AND VIETNAMESE ISLAND??? OR STEALING OUR FISH!!!

    • @ghoziakbar6410
      @ghoziakbar6410 Před měsícem

      "For thousands of years"
      It's not like China was always this powerful for thousands of years, they have long history of collapses in every couple of centuries.

    • @Pelerkuda45
      @Pelerkuda45 Před měsícem +4

      You don't see what China Coast Guard doing on Philliphine Coast Line

  • @erwinlee2842
    @erwinlee2842 Před měsícem +5

    Does Indonesian know if Indonesia ever become USA competitor Indonesia is the next on USA dinner table?

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 Před měsícem +1

    Whistling while we work! Many will say, why Whistling together? Keep watch!

  • @karyokaryoful
    @karyokaryoful Před měsícem +19

    Another nice interview sir, appreciate 🙏

  • @rusminnoer632
    @rusminnoer632 Před měsícem +10

    Professor Mearsheimer is the BEST.
    Cerdas luar biasa...

  • @brianbackes4974
    @brianbackes4974 Před měsícem

    Top shelf work. Thank you both.

  • @narveenaryaputri9759
    @narveenaryaputri9759 Před 4 dny

    This is an insight in the philosophical base
    Worth listening :
    Moral compass
    Realistic logic
    Economist logic
    Prosperity goal
    Survival goal !
    That's the balance
    Thanks for asking that very insightful question Gita.

  • @Aronshmuli665
    @Aronshmuli665 Před měsícem +3

    Great coverage, thank you

  • @tohweecheng
    @tohweecheng Před měsícem +6

    A lot of respect for the professor. What I would like to hear is the consideration of the cultures' influences in the decision making, rather than focusing on how the rest of the non-Western world would make decision based on pure Western thinking. Remember, China would have to govern Taiwan island once they re-unified, which is unlike Israel (who would just go ahead to cleanse), or Russia (who would be happy if Ukraine remains a rump state).