Curious about the locations in California and the connections to Iran as you mentioned in the video description? Any connections to the influx of Iranians to texas ? What years would've that been? Incredible video, with RARELY mentioned cast of characters .
Iran was a completely different country to what it is now. Thank the CIA for that. Jimmy Blue Eyes and Meyer Lansky had connections there however there are connections to Texas and the southern Mafia which I'll explain later. Illegal oil to casinos to a lot more...
It's amazing how more people think that the assassination was a conspiracy than who think he acted alone. I was unsure until I read some big books debunking every angle of a conspiracy. Case Closed us one of them and started learning that many people lie to us and accuse others of it. I assume that journalists should know this when discussing the topic.
I actually read "Case Closed," and it's a great book that I frequently reference. It's a reliable source for pinpointing credible information. However, even Gerald Posner made mistakes. For example, Posner claimed there was no proof that David Ferrie and Oswald knew each other. Contrary to this, we have pictures and FBI reports confirming they did, including a photo of them together when Oswald was 16. Posner later retracted this statement, as well as several others. At least Posner was honest enough to correct his mistakes, unlike some who manipulate the narrative. I have read his book thoroughly and will use it to show Oswald was the gunman, highlighting every retraction Posner made. Posner himself acknowledged that the most credible conspiracy theory involves organized crime. While "Case Closed" is an excellent book, it lacks some information now considered factual. I suggest "Road to Dallas" by David Kaiser for a more comprehensive understanding.
It depends all the facts point to John F Kennedy and his father having the deal with organised and Robert being kept in the dark. The couriers were lawyers and even mistresses. Robert then being made Attorney General was a mind boggling choice and something the family would go on to regret.
@@HistoryAndOrganisedCrime1919keeping Robert in the dark seems suicidal. Thoughts on his ultimate undoing? And in yoyr opinion what is the biggest thing they don't want revealed in the declassified docs on 11/23/63 ?
Some like the narrator some don't. I would do it myself but some of my docs are too long and I'll butcher the names even more. My strong Brummie Accent does me no favours also
If you carried on you would have possibly gotten some information that backed up that argument. To gain a thorough understanding of history or any event, it's crucial to explore diverse perspectives. Dive into opinions, books, documentaries, and research that both support and challenge your views. By examining facts from multiple sides, you can form a well-rounded opinion. Additionally, always question whether your knowledge is based on thorough research and fact-checking, or if it's third-hand information from unchecked sources. Personally, I ensure I gather both sides of an argument before forming my opinions. I continually challenge my research and viewpoints, presenting facts and citing sources to substantiate my arguments. This approach ensures a balanced and informed perspective.
@@HistoryAndOrganisedCrime1919 I have folowed advice that as many of us have, ever since the Event; TONS of documentation even before YOU, AI, was invented! Did you miss the "magic Bullet" theory? The witnesses who all disappeared, see the JFK film? Look up Meersheimer? Just asking, am intrigued...🙂
Before I was invented, many witnesses to the events at the Grassy Knoll disappeared. Only one individual actually claimed to have seen something there; the rest either heard shots or felt that a gunshot came from that direction. If you're referring to the JFK film by Oliver Stone or using Jim Garrison's investigation as the basis for your understanding of the Kennedy assassination, it’s important to note that both have significant flaws. The film suggests that Clay Shaw was responsible, but it's filled with inaccuracies and distortions of the truth. For example, in the movie, David Ferrie is introduced early on, yet on the day of the assassination, Ferrie, along with Guy Banister, was actually in court with Carlos Marcello. Garrison's investigation was influenced by Marcello, and there are documents on my channel exposing Garrison's ties to organized crime. The JFK movie twists facts and spreads misinformation. Consider why didnt Garrison interview Ruby in the first place. Feel free to check out those documents, and you may find that the JFK movie isn't a reliable source for historical facts.
Curious about the locations in California and the connections to Iran as you mentioned in the video description? Any connections to the influx of Iranians to texas ? What years would've that been?
Incredible video, with RARELY mentioned cast of characters .
Iran was a completely different country to what it is now. Thank the CIA for that. Jimmy Blue Eyes and Meyer Lansky had connections there however there are connections to Texas and the southern Mafia which I'll explain later. Illegal oil to casinos to a lot more...
@HistoryAndOrganisedCrime1919 we can thank the Cia for so many things. Looking forward to your content.
Glad to have you onboard!
Great Video..
Glad you enjoyed it
Oswald was only 24 year’s old when he carried out the assassination of John Kennedy.
He was one strange man.
He was a clueless patsy if you haven't learned this you have no clue or perhaps you tow the fed line 😊
It's amazing how more people think that the assassination was a conspiracy than who think he acted alone. I was unsure until I read some big books debunking every angle of a conspiracy. Case Closed us one of them and started learning that many people lie to us and accuse others of it. I assume that journalists should know this when discussing the topic.
I actually read "Case Closed," and it's a great book that I frequently reference. It's a reliable source for pinpointing credible information.
However, even Gerald Posner made mistakes. For example, Posner claimed there was no proof that David Ferrie and Oswald knew each other. Contrary to this, we have pictures and FBI reports confirming they did, including a photo of them together when Oswald was 16. Posner later retracted this statement, as well as several others. At least Posner was honest enough to correct his mistakes, unlike some who manipulate the narrative. I have read his book thoroughly and will use it to show Oswald was the gunman, highlighting every retraction Posner made. Posner himself acknowledged that the most credible conspiracy theory involves organized crime.
While "Case Closed" is an excellent book, it lacks some information now considered factual. I suggest "Road to Dallas" by David Kaiser for a more comprehensive understanding.
@@user-wb7nv9ht1gYou should Google JFK Investigation FBI Documents Released. It is stated by investigators that it probably was a conspiracy.
Carlos and the Dixie mafia is two totally different things though
Two different things yet heavily connected back to each other.
Thanks! Love it
Glad you like it!
UK ?💪💵🎯your hitting 100%
Many thanks for I'm glad you enjoyed the docs
Talksport Live
Well we all know what happened to Tony “The Ant” Spilotro !
💯💯💯
Look forward to our interview.
The UK dont figure
Birmingham UK
The perzdent was a to face rats and his brothers and they made a deal with the mobs and you guys got what you want 🤔🤔🤔🤔
It depends all the facts point to John F Kennedy and his father having the deal with organised and Robert being kept in the dark. The couriers were lawyers and even mistresses. Robert then being made Attorney General was a mind boggling choice and something the family would go on to regret.
@@HistoryAndOrganisedCrime1919keeping Robert in the dark seems suicidal. Thoughts on his ultimate undoing? And in yoyr opinion what is the biggest thing they don't want revealed in the declassified docs on 11/23/63 ?
This Would Be, So Awesome, If You, Could Have Found the RIGHT ( Narrator ).......
Some like the narrator some don't. I would do it myself but some of my docs are too long and I'll butcher the names even more. My strong Brummie Accent does me no favours also
Were doing fine until insisting Oswald killed JFK. Thank you for discrediting yourself seven minutes in so I do not have to waste any more of my time.
If you carried on you would have possibly gotten some information that backed up that argument. To gain a thorough understanding of history or any event, it's crucial to explore diverse perspectives. Dive into opinions, books, documentaries, and research that both support and challenge your views. By examining facts from multiple sides, you can form a well-rounded opinion. Additionally, always question whether your knowledge is based on thorough research and fact-checking, or if it's third-hand information from unchecked sources. Personally, I ensure I gather both sides of an argument before forming my opinions. I continually challenge my research and viewpoints, presenting facts and citing sources to substantiate my arguments. This approach ensures a balanced and informed perspective.
@@HistoryAndOrganisedCrime1919
I have folowed advice that as many of us have, ever since the Event; TONS of documentation even before YOU, AI, was invented! Did you miss the "magic Bullet" theory? The witnesses who all disappeared, see the JFK film? Look up Meersheimer? Just asking, am intrigued...🙂
Before I was invented, many witnesses to the events at the Grassy Knoll disappeared. Only one individual actually claimed to have seen something there; the rest either heard shots or felt that a gunshot came from that direction.
If you're referring to the JFK film by Oliver Stone or using Jim Garrison's investigation as the basis for your understanding of the Kennedy assassination, it’s important to note that both have significant flaws. The film suggests that Clay Shaw was responsible, but it's filled with inaccuracies and distortions of the truth.
For example, in the movie, David Ferrie is introduced early on, yet on the day of the assassination, Ferrie, along with Guy Banister, was actually in court with Carlos Marcello. Garrison's investigation was influenced by Marcello, and there are documents on my channel exposing Garrison's ties to organized crime. The JFK movie twists facts and spreads misinformation.
Consider why didnt Garrison interview Ruby in the first place.
Feel free to check out those documents, and you may find that the JFK movie isn't a reliable source for historical facts.
Oswald did shoot and kill JFK, he just didn't act alone. He was the only one to get caught Thats why the Mob had him killed
Pretty out dated documentary.
I know it's outdated it's called History...
Graphics are terrible.