"The Big Bang is a Mirror!" Neil Turok
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 05. 2024
- Curt's "String Theory Iceberg": • The String Theory Iceb...
Main Episode with Neil Turok (April 2024): • The (Simple) Theory Th...
Consider signing up for TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org
Support TOE:
- Patreon: / curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!)
- Crypto: tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE
- PayPal: tinyurl.com/paypalTOE
- TOE Merch: tinyurl.com/TOEmerch
Follow TOE:
- NEW Get my 'Top 10 TOEs' PDF + Weekly Personal Updates: www.curtjaimungal.org
- Instagram: / theoriesofeverythingpod
- TikTok: / theoriesofeverything_
- Twitter: / toewithcurt
- Discord Invite: / discord
- iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast...
- Pandora: pdora.co/33b9lfP
- Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9...
- Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: / theoriesofeverything
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theoriesofeverything - Věda a technologie
Main Episode with Neil Turok (April 2024): czcams.com/video/ZUp9x44N3uE/video.html
Consider signing up for TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org
1 = 0 = infinity
If everything came out of one single point, or 1, it means infinity comes out of a single point, which means there is infinity is a single point, they are the same. The universe is also infinite, goes on forever. If Laurence Kraus is right and the universe came from nothing, it means nothing is the same as everything, or infinity, or 1.
Krauss is a dope. The "single point" is incorrect. Listen to Turok again. It is a conformal zero, meaning the scale factor goes to zero, and the boundary is perfect CPT, a reflecting boundary condition. This means if you literally were a daemon or angel going back to the conformal zero following a field line (or whatever), you would just go back endlessly shrinking forever. A conformal zero is not the same as a metric zero.
"Billions of years ago, nothing exploded and became everything. Then it rained on the rocks for millions of years, the rocks came alive and here we are!"- Modern science
I found the cliff notes version!
Whole interview was incredible
both a theory and a scientist that are a breath of fresh air.
How is a dumb idea a breath of fresh air?
In the 20th century, the theoretical physics community made sense in their understanding of physics. In the 21st century, it's as if there is no understanding of what the experiments mean, and only ridiculous conjecture based on whatever is cool or interesting, not on what nature is really doing.
16) The Primordial Cosmic Singularity
Contradictory:
Classical Big Bang Cosmology
As t → 0, classical solutions become transcendentally ill-defined at an initial singularity where all known laws of physics break down.
This inevitably paradoxical breakdown of deterministic geometric description represents an impassable limit.
Non-Contradictory Possibility:
Infinitesimal Fractal Geometrogenesis
M0 = Σn |Un(t = 0)⟩ (Primordial fracted state)
|Un(t)⟩ = Un(t) |Un(0)⟩ (Evolution fractal operator)
ds2 = Σn,m cn,m Γn,m (Metric from mnadic correlations)
Treating the primordial geometric inception M0 as a superposition of infinitesimal fractal-evolving monadic perspectives avoids singular infinities from the start.
This goes hard
bro can speak wingdings
Please something on Charles Buhler
egg-->chicken-->chicken egg
Why is the cosmic microwave background considered a remnant when microwaves travel at the speed of light?
If every starting point begins with the Big Bang and none of the models pan out, when is it appropriate to start questioning the Big Bang?
where does he actually talk about: "The Big Bang is a Mirror"?
SO NON INTELLIGENCE CAUSED THE EFFECT OF INTELLIGENCE a contradiction? No way.
4:56 if you put in a difference the differences share and can reveal other differences in relation and expand. Similar to predictions. You put in a bunch of differences but the differences themselves have differences so it’s like a matrix of differences that can be shared and reveal a lot more. Kinda like cubing. Every difference is connected but the patterns reveal the distance in differences.
14:50 if Stephen Wolfram is right, and he can find GR and QM and the 2nd Law in the Ruliad, and it all comes down to the perspective / how you cut the cheese, then we probably don’t need anything else in addition, other than find the missing perspectives / ways to cut the cheese / ways to be an observer to explain the apparent contradictions.
On the other hand: If the structure of it all is somehow determining the laws, and we can’t find new laws to make things fit, we might still need to find new structures on cosmological scales.
Wolfram hinted that the dimensionality of Space is only approximately 3D, and maybe that’s another perspective to work from.
Already the AdS/CFT correspondence hinted that Spacetime (and thus Gravity) is emergent and not fundamental.
The universe might be calculating the next step “in the background”, and all events in spacetime might not be a complete representation of keeping track of what is really going on, but only a coarse grained picture of the full dynamics.
Imaginary time is essentially what spiritual universes are made of.
4:19 i think he sees inflation as just blowing up a balloon but you don’t see that every difference of the balloon is being alrtered or changed so something different is expanded into. Like if i expanded 1+1=2 and then used the difference of 2 to say that 2+2=4 I’ve expanded the differences and revealed them. They aren’t not there, the balloons rubber isn’t the same and the air inside is different as well and exchanging the difference with the rubber. It’s not separated so the changes are relative to the inflation.
Finally someone said it.
Yes it's a mirror.
If 0 = 0 + 0i then 0D = 0D + 0Di.
As I speak to ⚫️🌬️to others, it’s my truth in them I seek! Amirasada ⚙️🌍[⚫️Blackmirror:Timeless]⚡️
Words: unfathomable weight! Like from a source, spaces between, the voice has access to the source! Thus changes all else!
☕️⚡️cool vid dude, as usual 👏
Causality always travels into the future. When Isaac Newton discovered that For Every Action There is a Reaction, he obviously wasn't talking about backwards in time moving reactions.
It doesnt. Time is sick illusion. Horrible events echo back in time. This is how i save ppl (dont ask how or why - brain is open). Ie. Take note - future is probable, but not fixed. Paradoxical. I know.
Oh and expansion or inflation whatever you want to call it will probably show an unevenness in the cosmic background. Like earth has a gravity and others do too but not the same as other areas but close and far or maybe there is a copy somewhere but the differences aren’t so far that they’re impossible. We see this in all the new discoveries and inventions. It’s not separated.
If anyone paid attention to anything buddhist you would’ve heard this theory a long time ago! Tibettan buddhism covers this theory comprehensively! Bowing.
It does not matter who said, so much as what and how was said. Bragging about Buddhism seems dubious if you really are talking about Buddhism either?
@@commentarytalk1446I think you missed the point of what this person was trying to say
Agreed, I find eastern scripture aligns with our recent scientific discoveries in many areas, it’s crazy how people already knew this years before somehow and we are only now approaching it through the empirical method.
@@commentarytalk1446
It does matter who said as much as how it was said this is no more than the same as tik tok kids seeing and reposting someone else’s art and attempting to pass it off as their own thru others ignorance… which is dubious to say the least and has historically always been a huge problem :) Even this guy is talking “i did not come up with this and that idea that was the experimenters”
Just sayin this is not an original idea or theory it’s been here long time!
@@egglion7931 *materialistic method* more like hah
We should move away from the Schwarzschild solution and think in terms of Kerr black holes instead, because everything in the known universe rotates, including Sag A*. The presence of spin alters the causal structure of the spacetime dramatically. The ring singularity is avoidable, and the black hole becomes a conduit to a new universe. Recently Kerr himself argued that the Hawking singularity theorem fails in the Kerr spacetime. So build the new cosmology by including spin (perhaps we should look at the Einstein-Cartan theory), and watch the Big Bang singularity disappear!
Could be, that the obvious(imo) truth about the universe is that it is constructed of two fundamental parts, an infinite empty space and materia in it. Time in general is the observation of movement and nothing ever came out from nothing, thus time is infinite also. So, all there is, has always existed and will always exist. Why is the second law of thermodynamics so confusing is imo based on arbitrary boundaries in science(scientific theory must be able to proven wrong, but one can not observe infinity, thus we limit our science too, which is actually quite harmful to future progress in many ways). Force creates symmetry, thus the balance.
SO NO KNOWLEDGE CAUSED THE A is B impossible contradiction effect of KNOWLEDGE? NO WAY. PERIOD.
So if the differences are responsible for the waves then maybe the differences can cause a reverb then our differences can be shaping the world and by expanding into the differences like how quantum mechanics shares to reveal new differences like a person or a movie or a sound. Maybe the waves are so low because it’s not only the big that create the waves, even the small differences cause changes and just like hitler, a small difference can cascade just like when we drop a ball, it’s cascading through the differences and being pushed and pulled as well as pushing and pulling itself.
What i mean is that if the gravitational waves in the cosmic background is low, unlike the predictions from the Big Bang then maybe the Big Bang did happen, but the gravitational waves are reverb through humans through planets and through all the differences and sharing and that’s why it looks lower than predicted.
So if eventually the universe stops expanding, then all that will be left are black holes, eventually due to lack of gravity, all black holes will converge and that would be the entire universe into one black hole, then with no gravity left to compress the last black hole, kaboom another universe!
Great science fiction though
Curt, We already know that the origin of our current universe could not have been a single point because of quantum mechanics. That is like mathematically dividing by zero, and this warns us that our theory is incorrect.
The universe can be like the creation of the computer. It takes intelligence to exist. All the parts are made independently from one another and then assembled. This is how the universe came into existence by an infinite omniscient omnipotent omnipresent being ie. God.❤😂🎉🎉
Stick with Joscha Bach’s “Computationalism”: there are no infinities. The moment you accept infinity, your language / mathematics breaks down (Goedel), and everything you say becomes meaningless.
Garbage in, garbage out. To say anything true, your language / mathematics must be computational. Everything else can not be talked about meaningfully / without running into contradictions (Goedel), thus is not worth saying in the first place. - If your truth is not computational, it is not truth but gibberish; rather stay silent. (- I’m constantly producing gibberish myself: it’s hard to stop.)
Perhaps the mirror analogy applies in a different way. Maybe the Bang is the mirror into an interiority of the singularity.
There are no particles that move back in time. There is also no evidence that time travel is possible.
@@wulphstein
Why does a mirror require that a particle go back in time?
Neutron decay cosmology
The big bang is a continuous process.
The white holes we look for are individual neutrons decaying in a deep void somewhere.
Neutron in at event horizon because electron capture makes all matter neutrons at that gravity.
They drop their kinetic energy of as mass, and history, for the event horizon.
The neutron takes an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space where the quantum basement is the absolute lowest and easiest to penetrate.
Neutron out in deep void.
Decays into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, proton electron soup, Dark matter.
The decay from neutron 0.6fm³ to 1m³ of hydrogen gas is a volume increase of around 10⁴⁵. Expansion. Dark energy.
Then it falls and condenses like everything does.
Falling towards an event horizon.
Neutron decay cosmology.
As inevitable as gravity.
A great deal of manifestations yet nothing exist.another dreamstate manifestation.
The simple question? Was a intelligent conscious being responsible for creating the physical universe by using Einstein's equation M=E/c²? What came first non physical energy or physical matter measured in mass units. Could an infinite being cause the effect of matter by spirit energy. Not something from nothing but something physical from something not physical ie spirit energy.❤❤❤
Another dumb and unnecessary idea.
Hello Curt and Neil.
The simple fact is, for all the thousands of physicist's and cosmologist's brains working on it, and the billions of pounds being spent on it, still no one has a clue of how either the Atom or the universe works.
The whole standard model is only conjecture, and since none of the so-called particles that make up the standard model table of particles have never been seen, the only thing that can be said for them, is that they are just varying sized piecs broken off of the atom.
Like you Neil, I believe that the answers that we need are very simple, and the problems that are preventing the scientific community from understanding the outstanding questions, are mainly misconceptions.
The biggest question that needs to be asked in Cosmology is, Why is it that we can only see back to the CMBR at the same distance in every direction? This presents two problems. Firstly, in a universe that is said to have a beginning in a Big Bang and Cosmic inflation within a billionth of a billionth of a second, dissipating the heat, radiation, and Matter throughout the universe, this would imply that there is a limit to how far this matter has spread.
If our Earth is situated anywhere other than the middle of this mass, we should see the CMBR at different distances in every direction. And Yes I have studied the ; Relativistic cosmological model, and what I say still stands.
And secondly, since the JWST is proving that there are fully mature galaxies so far back in time that they would have to have existed before the so-called Big Bang, It rules out that the CMBR is the leftover radiation, and it is not what it is believed to be.
Since the only thing that supports the Big Bang is the CMBR, the only evidence for an expanding universe is Redshift and the only way that the Big Bang can be rationalized in a thermally equal universe is by the idea of Cosmic Inflation, which is a physical impossibility, Physicists are going round in circles trying to support the status quo.
I would propose that the standard model is flawed at the level of the atom.
There was no Big Bang and Cosmic inflation.
The universe is not expanding, has always existed much as it is today and extends to infinity, therefore it has no beginning and probably will never end.
There are two forces of Gravity, which I have a simple experiment that can prove this, and also proves the existence of Dark Energy / Dark matter.
Dark Matter is an incredibly small Negatively charged Monopole particle in a cloud that fills every available empty space throughout the universe.
Dark Energy, is the negative force of repulsion produced by the Dark Matter Particles trying to repel each other in every direction. It is also one of the two forces of gravity.
The CMBR is not due to the Big Bang, but is a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation.
Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to electromagnetic radiation losing speed and energy over billions of years, If you consider over a period of around 14 Billion years, it would only have to lose 1 mile per second every 140,000 years to account for the redshift we see.
This and much more is explained in my Hypothesis, ( The Two Monopole Particle Universe ), details of which can be found by typing Tony Norman Marsh into Google
If you or any of your panel are interested and can provide me with an email address, I am happy to send you a copy of the manuscript I sent for publication, or it can be read instantly on kindle
Since you are reviewing TOEs, My hypothesis is just that, and starts at the atom and follows through to Cosmology, simply and logically. I am sure you would find it interesting. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh
Either intelligent conscious being created the intelligent universe or not. Does it make sense that A is B, caused the whole universe?
A non conscious non intelligent non being caused the impossible contradiction effect of
B conscious intelligent being in the universe
Infinite intelligence had to cause the effect of this intelligent universe.❤❤❤