Jordan Peterson: The Most Important Battleground Between Good and Evil is Psychological
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 02. 2018
- Dear reviewer of my channel, please read: permalink.ph...
Jordan B Peterson (born June 12, 1962) is a Canadian clinical psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. Here, he talks about the battleground between good and evil.
You can find the rest of the interview, here: • Video
This clip is part of the interview " Jordan B. Peterson finally asked about the Catholic Faith PatrickCoffin.media was so kind to provide part of the interview as material for this channel. You can watch the rest of the interview here: • Video
Ressources: www.patrickcoffin.media/show
Tweet to Patrick: / patrick_coffin
Facebook: / patrickcoffin.media
You can support his work here: www.patrickcoffin.media/donate
---
This channel aims at extracting central points of presentations into short clips. If you like the content, subscribe to the channel!
This clip is part of an interview by PatrickCoffin.media. He was so kind to provide part of the interview as material for this channel. You can watch the rest of the interview here: czcams.com/video/W5iaERTETvE/video.html Also, contact infos are in the description.
PhilosophyInsights,
•Clean and straightforward titles.
•Well formatted thumbnails.
•Segments are directly associated with your titles.(No fillers)
•A high quality list of different philosophers, and other notable academics.
•Gives full discussion/debate/lecture in description.
•Doesn't have 500 ads within the upload.
This is what channels with this type of format should strive for. One this is certain.....
*PhilosophyInsights has cleaned their room!* 😃👏
Like Gandhi said "be the change you want to see in the world".
E.L.Dorado Gandhi was racist btw. And like hitler.
Worth your time
The order that truthful speech brings in the world is good.
Okay... I'm 64 years old and his challenge to try to tell the truth for 30 days blew my mind... I thought telling the truth happened all the time with the exception of maybe once every few years....
The path for me is to accept the path....be grateful for the suffering and observe the opportunities that open... the old cliche of when a door closes a window opens is so true... That's why it is an everlasting cliche... many times I feel like I'm going down the path backwards and blindfolded but I have learned to remain faithful and so far I have not been let down. The holy war continues to build and intensify.
Anyone know where I can find the good vs evil videos he talks about the soldiers watching
Evil exists. Without it there is no good and there is no choice. You are either overwhelmingly good or overwhelmingly evil. That is your choice.
Tragedy and injustice exists. Without it, you cannot react. You either react overwhelmingly with goodness or react overwhelmingly with evil (i.e. you just don't care as long as it does not affect you and you are not going to try to intercede.) Without good and evil there is no choice and therefore you have no value. You are the same as any other animal.
I really really like this.
Then you'll love the book, in case you haven't already read it :)
"STOP LYING!" That's the magic motto! Thank you, PhilosophyInsights. God Bless you and yours.
I find saying things that are “not untrue” really upsets people.
second. and cannot wait for Peterson book waiting on the library for it!
really? mhm. thank you kind sir for the suggestion.
Yeah, if you're such a fan of Peterson's, support his work -- buy the book!
Okay, I want to address his last point. The reason accepting tragedy and living in truth transforms people into better people and situations. What people need to know is that God gave everyone free will. It's only when we try to control each other with lies and manipulation that we notice malevolence prevail. When we only control ourselves, we realize that most things, if not everything in our lives, are under our control. We stop pointing the finger at God and others. Everyone knows you can't help people who don't want your help. First, you have to acknowledge that you need it in order to at least be open to it. A lot of people are closed off because they just want to control other people and are not willing to humble themselves to receive the help they so desperately need. They want people in their life if only they can dictate when how and what those people contribute to them without giving anything in return. When the proper way to live is to give and, in return, receive an abundance that is God-given. Because they give and help freely. But the best you can do for anyone is teach the hard lessons that you managed to learn and contribute in the way that makes you feel comfortable. Expecting malevolence while understanding, you have no control over others that they don't give if not under tyranny or distress. Malevolence is controlling. If you know that, you can recognize it before it escalates and hopefully create a safe distance before the tragic end. If not, you can just control only what's in your power and remain blameless as possible so you don't have to agonize over your own part in it. And that's the part that eats people up.
It is pronounced, me lie (mi lai).
What's the name of the book?
Twelve rules for life.
Thanos syndrome: believing calculated murders are good for the ecosystem or humanity.
Evil is a religious word that theologians wanted us to believe was an evil devil, tempting weakened souls into succumbing to the devil's evil ways.
In this modern era ... it would be nice if we could (from lack of use) do away with such archaic ... nonsensical jargon ... stop pointing at each other as being "evil," and set our selves free of that archaic religious terminology.
I suggest that “we” can be very mean, nasty, manipulative, domineering, underhanded, arrogant, disgusting, untrustworthy, vicious animals, and be referred to by a lot of other choice fitting terminology … but we should not be referring to each other as being evil.
Evil prevail when good men do nothing
Genesis 19:31 - lol
.
A certain person... claims PTSD because their parents were strict disciplinarians.
As a result they run away from home as a minor.
As a result of never witnessing what a fatherly role should be, they develop an overt aversion to any authority figure and associate discipline with an unhealthy concept of being controlled
As a result they never learn respect for others and develop a narcissistic personality
...
Robert Glidewell
how many beatings should the young man have put up with?
how much verbal abuse helps the healthy development of a person?
All way off base...
A more correct statement would be .. discipline is not abuse.
Further elaboration of second-half of your post dealing with projection is welcome
PolyDimensionals Music ... irrelevant
Justifyed Mattitude ... just plain weird
Justifyed Mattitude ...
All way off base...
And discipline is not abuse none nonetheless
Not present to observe Behavior
Regardless said cause lead to said effect
On Belial, On Belzebub, on Ashteroth, by the powers of Satan, I do perform magic, to the extent allowed me by the foolishness of God. I blaspheme. And I murder.
So what does Jordan Peterson offer? He lives off the capital of Christianity and yet his view is classical liberalism. He never answers the question ‘Why?’ He shares the same world view as postmodernism.
Jordan, I have believed that PTSD is a hallmarked by a person not acting Honorably.
You're wrong.
@@bobtaylor170 How so. What is your experience? What are your credentials. Don't just snipe.
@@ConradSzymczak I'm a childhood mass murder survivor, via a suitcase bomb which was so strong FBI chemists estimated it comprised at least six sticks of dynamite. You're not making a reference to PTSD. The term you're looking for is "moral injury," and I don't doubt you can find a lot about it online. I'm sorry if you found me sniperish. It's not what I intended. Moral injury is a severe problem. I'm not quite sure if it's considered a psychiatric illness, but it's certainly a psychological, existential, theological devastation.
@@bobtaylor170 I am glad you responded as you did. Context here is paramount. In your case you were a victim. In my reference, PTSD is referring to a "perpetrator". Not evil or malicious, but one who has had to commit acts not normally seen in civilian life. I refer to Military Veterans and their PTSD. Things do "happen" to military members, but they are also required to act IAW ROEs within Laws of Warfare. Not at all what you experienced. I bounced this concept off several combat veteran brothers who all agreed with this concept. I hope you find peace in the rest of your life's Journey.
@@bobtaylor170 www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/cooccurring/moral_injury.asp#:~:text=Moral%20injury%20is%20the%20distressing,individual's%20values%20and%20moral%20beliefs.