Hey yo, quick tip to anyone who doesn't vlog or point a camera at their own face from a couple centimeters away.. A 24-70 f/2.8 is pretty much the only lens you will need if filming with a full frame camera, I'd recommend the sigma unless you've got very deep pockets. Also love your new secretary Matti, he knows his codecs well. 👌
so true. if i'd shoot a documentary with a director/producer the 24-70 or even 24-105 would be my first choice. maybe a prime for b-roll after that if we have time. Been there done that, if your job is to get the shot... .
Absolutely agree, for actual narrative filmmaking such as features, short film etc… it’s pretty much all you need. Majority of cinema use these focal lengths and very much so at f2.8.
A 24-70 is a very versatile lens, it's great if you're just starting out in filmmaking and you're wondering which lens should you buy first, also a good 24-70 lens will last you a lifetime. On the other hand, your comment is valid, it may lack character however you can also upgrade your gear in the future and opt for a good prime lens set. Tip: Own the basics and rent the rest if you're doing this as a career 😉
I've only used a Sigma 18-35 for my GH5 at f/2.8 for YEARS, so I figured if I change to a7s III that something like this would give me basically the same range. I'm ok with "average" 😅
I use the sigma 24-70 2.8 ART and it’s one of the best lenses I’ve ever owned. It’s so versatile and I use it on most if not every shoot unless I’m using my underwater housing, or doing architecture photography in which I use my 20mm 1.8. Carrying 4 lenses to achieve the relatively same focusing range (24mm 35mm 50mm and 85mm), just isn’t realistic for a lot of people who aren’t in a studio. This lens looks great but with already owning the sigma, this doesn’t offer enough difference
Years ago, I bought a 35-70mm f/2.8 D Nikkor auto focus zoom lens. Later, I upgraded to 28-70mm f/2.8 D Nikkor auto focus zoom lens. When Nikon replaced the 28-70 D with the 24-70mm f/2.8 G auto focus zoom lens, I did not buy it because it was a “G” lens that did not have an aperture ring. Some of my camera bodies need the aperture ring for exposure control.
The tightening of the zoom ring is probably so that it won't change focal lengths if it gets bumped or for an overhead shot so that the weight of the lens doesn't change the focal length (that has happened to me on a sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 because it was really loose). Loosening focal ring it will help with smoother zooms.
I function solely off 24 and 85mm, the 85 can grab close and medium shots while the 24 can grab any wide documentation shot I want. You don’t NEED anything just do what works for you; I wanted faster apertures so I went primes
I think it’s completely depending on what line of work your in. I mean, for example for run & gun work, i think this is the absolute best if you don’t know what to expect and want a variety of shots. But yeah, not the best at anything, i can agree on that, but maybe the best allrounder.
If you're on a gimbal and on a fast-paced job, where it just takes too long to be switching lenses constantly and rebalancing, the 24-70 is really the best option out there.
Even though many probably would say you’re ranting, I appreciate the knowledge I glean from your videos concerning focal lengths, focus shifting, etc. Keep up the good work Matti. We’re learning a lot.
It's funny to hear you say that you find the 24-70mm f/2.8 to be too average. I didn't buy one for the same reason. I purchased ultra-wide and telephoto zooms & primes in 35mm f/1.2 & anamorphic 50mm t/2.9 instead. But, for "run&gun" video I usually use a 24-105mm f/4 macro stabilised lens, as it covers a larger zoom range. (Panasonic S1H.)
I have to say, I had a 16-35 for a while, but when you're actually going light, it just isn't enough range for pulling an interesting variety of shots together for a mini-sequence, especially on FF! Switched out to a 24-70 2.8ii (Canon) a few years ago and never looked back. Truly cannot love any 24-105 or similar though, that F4 just really takes the edge off everything and it's just a bit dull! Joined the Fx6 gang a month ago now though, so looking at the painful reality of selling all my canon glass as that sony AF is just W I L D.
I've been trying to get ahold of the Tamron 35 - 150 2.0. The versatility and the price make it really appealing. And for traveling, having two or three multiple purpose lenses means the most to me. I love my primes, but too much space for most traveling.
I have to disagree. Unless you are holding the camera and pointing it at yourself all the time, a 24-70 is a much better story telling lens than a wide zoom. I would much rather have a wide, fast prime such as a 20mm f1.8, 24-70 f2.8, and a 70-200 f2.8. Work horse focal ranges are convenient while the specialty ones (wide or telephoto) are present and at fast apertures when needed. Obvious use cases vary but that kind of kit is extremely flexible.
doesn't Danny Gevirtz used a 24-70 for most of his films? i thought i heard that in the bts for his bicycle video. I tend to use the 24-70 a lot for car photography
Totally agree with you. Like most people would say, this is just a one shot lens where you don’t have to change lens much. I use primes mainly so it’s either super wide or 70-200 would be my zoom I have. Btw, I purchased your NMO boxy t and crew neck long sleeve!
Interesting to hear why you haven’t purchased a 24-70. What’s interesting is your reasons not to buy are the reasons that is my number one go-to lens. I don’t like to carry three lenses (35mm, 50mm, & 85mm) when I can have one that covers roughly the same range. When was the last time I needed more than f/2.8? Can’t remember. In fact, f/2.8 is more than most of m6 shots. Sure, you get amazing bokeh with an f/1.2 but that is just over two stops better. It also makes the focus plane about five mm thick, so eye in focus but nose out. Love my RF 24-70. It’s always on my camera, every day, walk around lens.
depth of field is relative to the distance from subject, so a 50 f1.2 wide open actually have decent depth of field and subject separation for mid length to full body shots
THANK YOU. I have been debating on buying an 85mm 1.2 as my first expensive lens. I also want a 35 prime. I just dont like the idea of a 24-70, seems boring.
honestly I have never had one either. I had the 24-105 lens but the ONLY reason i had it was because I couldnt affort nice prime lenses. and I found myself in jobs where i didnt have time to swap glass. NOW, though. I pretty much only shoot at 24mm or 85mm. Yes. I only use primes now. and i LUUUUURV it.
I love your take. I'm curious how you travel with a wide zoom, a 24, a 35, and an 85. I'm usually shooting docs on my own for weeks at a time that's far from home, and I try to lighten my load as much as I can, so I stick to a 24-70 2.8 and a 70-200 4.0. Do you have people helping you lug stuff?
It's funny that I was trying to figure out for months what kind of lenses do I need after a brand change.. and I came to the same conclusion! And now I am having the "perfect" set and loving it for a month now.. this video just popped up today and confirms I've made a good decision for my purposes ;-)
I’m with you on this one. I’ve owned one 24-70 in my life and it pretty much stayed in the bag all the time. I recently switched to Sony after shooting canon for 20 years and I find if I need a Swiss Army of a lens; the 24-105 G has a better place for wide and tight; run and gun shots.
I have the Sony 24-105 G and I just purchased the Sony 24-70 today. I will have to check it out for myself when it comes in the mail in a couple days. I am a film student currently in school.
For me and how i shoot im either at super wide or punched in. So go to lenses are samyang 12mm or sigma 56mm and occasionally sony 85mm. then i have a 70-300. I do have a sigma 18-50 but i’ve found that yes it’s convenient to have, id rather have the wider apertures on the primes in a lot of situations.
Fair point Matti. Lately I'm pondering if I should buy a Tamron 28-75 GII fully customisable which many say it's great or get a telephoto lens which I'm a big fan of. Also I'm wondering if it's just better to save money and get one of the Zeiss Batis which is my kid's dream😻
@@mattih yes sir they do, I personally love Daniel Schiffer video's look and he often uses few Batis prime lenses. What would I do to put my hands on one of them!
24-70 is my most important lens it’s for run and gun situation most versatile and the very decent low light great for events and parties scenario I wouldn’t trade it up for anything else my work horse bread and butter lens
I have the Tamron 28-75 but have been looking to upgrade potentially! Love hearing your thoughts on the new 24-70, it seems like beast! Might have to get it! 💯✔️🔥
Seriously, I am impressed that you could jump up on the couch like that in skinny jeans and run away. But I do find the 24 to 70 to be a good all around lens especially when shooting on location.
Let me tell you a 24-70mm is a vacation lense if you prefer taking more portraits. i have a 16-35mm for vacations i can take my portraits and my landscape\travel photography shots. Basically you dont have to carry all your kit at your vacations. these lenses are cool.
Sony does make shaper lens than tamron and that lens is bigger. For people that won't use higher than 70mm, i would understand why. I bought the Tamron 28-250mm and i love it so yeah, i with you with ''team Tamron''
Watching and thinking with your clothing brand you should bring back a limited edition one with the learn make repeat and travel feels design under your new clothing brand
Totally agree on the 24-70, just nothing special about it - sure you can get special images, but not special because of the lens. I will say though that I still keep one just for those times that I feel lazy and only want to carry around a single body+lens. But there's nothing like a 14mm, or an f1.2-1.4 prime, or a real telephoto zoom for that special sauce you can't get with a 24-70.
Just got to full frame with a a7IV and a sigma art 24-70 and i understand the average at everything . I miss the 85 1.8 i had on an aps c with the nifty fifty from canon for example big time . 24-70 is a swiss knife , nothing more , nothing less .
I also have the A7iv. Got the 35 gm to start and added the 70-200 2.8 mk2 . I have zero regrets with those two combos. Maybe someday I get the 16-35 but not anytime soon
The 24-70mm is over hyped. It encompasses the most common focal lengths, but it doesn't do them as well as their prime counterparts. I'd be willing to pay $3k for one IF AND ONLY IF, they could get it to a f/2 or f/1.8. Beyond that, I'll get a used 24mm GM and a 85mm.
Get that NMO goodnessssss 🙌🏻 New Boxy T is soooo nice Torry killed it! And its the last chance to get the hoodie & long length sweater 🙏🏻
Quick question: will the NMO sweatshirt shrink after the wash/dryer?
Of course I just ordered both some Boxy T’s and hoodie just because it is You 🤗
Do you ship to Australia?
Would love to get one of those hoodies in Australia, how can we arrange that?
Hey yo, quick tip to anyone who doesn't vlog or point a camera at their own face from a couple centimeters away.. A 24-70 f/2.8 is pretty much the only lens you will need if filming with a full frame camera, I'd recommend the sigma unless you've got very deep pockets. Also love your new secretary Matti, he knows his codecs well. 👌
so true. if i'd shoot a documentary with a director/producer the 24-70 or even 24-105 would be my first choice. maybe a prime for b-roll after that if we have time. Been there done that, if your job is to get the shot... .
Agree man. I always see the 16-35 as a YT lens, whereas the 24-70 is a filmmaker lens.
Agreed
Absolutely agree, for actual narrative filmmaking such as features, short film etc… it’s pretty much all you need. Majority of cinema use these focal lengths and very much so at f2.8.
@@maruwaanmosesso I shouldn’t get it? Just a smaller lense?
A 24-70 is a very versatile lens, it's great if you're just starting out in filmmaking and you're wondering which lens should you buy first, also a good 24-70 lens will last you a lifetime. On the other hand, your comment is valid, it may lack character however you can also upgrade your gear in the future and opt for a good prime lens set.
Tip: Own the basics and rent the rest if you're doing this as a career 😉
This is the best advice
I’m actually stoked you mentioned the minimum focus distance. It’s something that’s incredibly important to me but is so overlooked on reviews!
Youre watching the wrong channels mate
100% maybe even the biggest upgrade for me personally
Min focus are amazing on 24-70/70-200 GM2
I’ve tended to stay away from 24-70s lately for that same reason, but they are great if you want to only carry one lens!
Yea there’s nothing wrong with it. I’ve just never felt like I needed one.
Or if you only able to purchase one lens
I'm definitely my least inspired when using my RF 24-70, but it saves me bringing a bag full of lenses. Worth it just for the convenience!
Exactly 👌
@@jeremydrakeford3124 never was a fan of a 24-70, but 28-70 f2 became my go to lens lately, loving the picture and versatility
I've only used a Sigma 18-35 for my GH5 at f/2.8 for YEARS, so I figured if I change to a7s III that something like this would give me basically the same range. I'm ok with "average" 😅
I use the sigma 24-70 2.8 ART and it’s one of the best lenses I’ve ever owned. It’s so versatile and I use it on most if not every shoot unless I’m using my underwater housing, or doing architecture photography in which I use my 20mm 1.8. Carrying 4 lenses to achieve the relatively same focusing range (24mm 35mm 50mm and 85mm), just isn’t realistic for a lot of people who aren’t in a studio.
This lens looks great but with already owning the sigma, this doesn’t offer enough difference
Years ago, I bought a 35-70mm f/2.8 D Nikkor auto focus zoom lens.
Later, I upgraded to 28-70mm f/2.8 D Nikkor auto focus zoom lens.
When Nikon replaced the 28-70 D with the 24-70mm f/2.8 G auto focus zoom lens, I did not buy it because it was a “G” lens that did not have an aperture ring. Some of my camera bodies need the aperture ring for exposure control.
Dude. Issac is freakin HILARIOUS! Definitely adds a spark to this channel 😂
Haha pretty much the reason I hired him
The tightening of the zoom ring is probably so that it won't change focal lengths if it gets bumped or for an overhead shot so that the weight of the lens doesn't change the focal length (that has happened to me on a sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 because it was really loose). Loosening focal ring it will help with smoother zooms.
Yes
I function solely off 24 and 85mm, the 85 can grab close and medium shots while the 24 can grab any wide documentation shot I want. You don’t NEED anything just do what works for you; I wanted faster apertures so I went primes
I think it’s completely depending on what line of work your in. I mean, for example for run & gun work, i think this is the absolute best if you don’t know what to expect and want a variety of shots. But yeah, not the best at anything, i can agree on that, but maybe the best allrounder.
If you're on a gimbal and on a fast-paced job, where it just takes too long to be switching lenses constantly and rebalancing, the 24-70 is really the best option out there.
Can we talk about that Green Bay Super Bowl Hat for a second!!! Repping my home town boyyyyy!!!!
😂
24-105 is nice for weddings and other live events where switching lenses isn't convenient, but 24-70 probably wouldn't be enough reach for me
I have sigmas 24-70, it works. I can agree with your reasons. I don’t see a reason to upgrade to the new GM, but I’m sure it’s solid.
Even though many probably would say you’re ranting, I appreciate the knowledge I glean from your videos concerning focal lengths, focus shifting, etc. Keep up the good work Matti. We’re learning a lot.
Love your work. You are the inspiration for me to start my channel.
It's funny to hear you say that you find the 24-70mm f/2.8 to be too average. I didn't buy one for the same reason. I purchased ultra-wide and telephoto zooms & primes in 35mm f/1.2 & anamorphic 50mm t/2.9 instead. But, for "run&gun" video I usually use a 24-105mm f/4 macro stabilised lens, as it covers a larger zoom range. (Panasonic S1H.)
Greatest lens 😍 I love your new editor his soo cool and funny
He’s great 😊
Solid video quality! ✌🏻 Enjoying these new videos and the color grading looks beautiful. Keep creating dude hey don't expose it to the rain 😂😂
Haha thanks dude 🙏🏻
I have to say, I had a 16-35 for a while, but when you're actually going light, it just isn't enough range for pulling an interesting variety of shots together for a mini-sequence, especially on FF! Switched out to a 24-70 2.8ii (Canon) a few years ago and never looked back. Truly cannot love any 24-105 or similar though, that F4 just really takes the edge off everything and it's just a bit dull! Joined the Fx6 gang a month ago now though, so looking at the painful reality of selling all my canon glass as that sony AF is just W I L D.
I just love wide focal lengths way more 😊
@@mattih I mostly film wildlife, so I guess I just have that eternal tele draw!! 🤣
I've been trying to get ahold of the Tamron 35 - 150 2.0. The versatility and the price make it really appealing. And for traveling, having two or three multiple purpose lenses means the most to me. I love my primes, but too much space for most traveling.
As a Norwegian I always appreciate a nice looking mirror 🤩
🙏🏻
I have to disagree. Unless you are holding the camera and pointing it at yourself all the time, a 24-70 is a much better story telling lens than a wide zoom.
I would much rather have a wide, fast prime such as a 20mm f1.8, 24-70 f2.8, and a 70-200 f2.8.
Work horse focal ranges are convenient while the specialty ones (wide or telephoto) are present and at fast apertures when needed. Obvious use cases vary but that kind of kit is extremely flexible.
The Nikon 24-70 2.8 was my first zoom and the only one I still have in my kit.
doesn't Danny Gevirtz used a 24-70 for most of his films? i thought i heard that in the bts for his bicycle video. I tend to use the 24-70 a lot for car photography
I agree. I use my 24-70 less and less as I got better, because of its “averageness.” Now I prefer fast primes.
I started going back to primes in my kit, 24GM, 35GM, 85 DG DN, and my #1 zoom tamron 35-150 2-2.8
Totally agree with you. Like most people would say, this is just a one shot lens where you don’t have to change lens much. I use primes mainly so it’s either super wide or 70-200 would be my zoom I have. Btw, I purchased your NMO boxy t and crew neck long sleeve!
Oh heck yesssss 🙌🏻 enjoy them man 😊
Interesting to hear why you haven’t purchased a 24-70. What’s interesting is your reasons not to buy are the reasons that is my number one go-to lens. I don’t like to carry three lenses (35mm, 50mm, & 85mm) when I can have one that covers roughly the same range. When was the last time I needed more than f/2.8? Can’t remember. In fact, f/2.8 is more than most of m6 shots. Sure, you get amazing bokeh with an f/1.2 but that is just over two stops better. It also makes the focus plane about five mm thick, so eye in focus but nose out. Love my RF 24-70. It’s always on my camera, every day, walk around lens.
depth of field is relative to the distance from subject, so a 50 f1.2 wide open actually have decent depth of field and subject separation for mid length to full body shots
THANK YOU. I have been debating on buying an 85mm 1.2 as my first expensive lens. I also want a 35 prime. I just dont like the idea of a 24-70, seems boring.
Oh 35 is so good 🙌🏻
Love the look. Curious why you went with 100% cotton rather than a poly blend.
Love the Green Bay Packers hat!!
I 2nd that!
😂 he’s my style guru now
Love your glasses!!
Thank you 🙏🏻 😊
Love the interaction man. You excel with other people around you! Isaac is a keeper 🥳
honestly I have never had one either. I had the 24-105 lens but the ONLY reason i had it was because I couldnt affort nice prime lenses. and I found myself in jobs where i didnt have time to swap glass. NOW, though. I pretty much only shoot at 24mm or 85mm. Yes. I only use primes now. and i LUUUUURV it.
Hi Nick.... just receive a message, same as you below.. can we trust it ?
I still have the tamron 28-75mm f2.8. Paired with sony a7siii and I’m happy with it. Very cheap!
LOOOL iisak is hilarious!
😊 you guys would get along
We need more of those endings Matti 😂
😂 every video ends in an action scene
Yesssssss 🔥😂
That's the beauty of the Canon 28-70 f2.... All the convenience of a zoom but with the sharpness of a prime and a wider aperture than the average zoom
I love your take. I'm curious how you travel with a wide zoom, a 24, a 35, and an 85. I'm usually shooting docs on my own for weeks at a time that's far from home, and I try to lighten my load as much as I can, so I stick to a 24-70 2.8 and a 70-200 4.0. Do you have people helping you lug stuff?
I have the Sigma 24-70 and I use that thing 20x more than my 16-35!
Noooo how could you 😂 my channel is 99% 16-35 haha
@@mattih Haha I knew I was bringing up a touchy subject lol.
It's funny that I was trying to figure out for months what kind of lenses do I need after a brand change.. and I came to the same conclusion! And now I am having the "perfect" set and loving it for a month now.. this video just popped up today and confirms I've made a good decision for my purposes ;-)
Cool! You should try the Lumix S5 with the 20-60 at some point. Hits the sweet spot at the wide end, at least
I’m with you on this one. I’ve owned one 24-70 in my life and it pretty much stayed in the bag all the time. I recently switched to Sony after shooting canon for 20 years and I find if I need a Swiss Army of a lens; the 24-105 G has a better place for wide and tight; run and gun shots.
I have the Sony 24-105 G and I just purchased the Sony 24-70 today. I will have to check it out for myself when it comes in the mail in a couple days. I am a film student currently in school.
@@RamenKing2023 Kick ass man! I wouldn’t want to do anything else.
I've been out grinding and not watching as much CZcams, but I really missed you Matti!
Aw thanks 😊 🙏🏻 glad you came back
@@mattih I'm glad to be back! You're still my favorite videographer ;)
First! 🔥🔥🔥
Greetings from the Philippines Matti! 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
That’s end clip had me in stitches 🤣😂 more ending like that please!
Completely agree with you on the 24-70mm!
Legend has it that Matti only shoots instagram bangers on a 35 prime.
For me, buying a 24-70 is like buying a Gucci bag: looks so nice, but I can’t justify the cost 😅🤦🏼♂️
Bahahah this is good 😂
Great video.. I was finally able to cop me a Boxy T. Blessings BTW your ending was hilarious hahaha
For me and how i shoot im either at super wide or punched in. So go to lenses are samyang 12mm or sigma 56mm and occasionally sony 85mm. then i have a 70-300. I do have a sigma 18-50 but i’ve found that yes it’s convenient to have, id rather have the wider apertures on the primes in a lot of situations.
Fair point Matti. Lately I'm pondering if I should buy a Tamron 28-75 GII fully customisable which many say it's great or get a telephoto lens which I'm a big fan of. Also I'm wondering if it's just better to save money and get one of the Zeiss Batis which is my kid's dream😻
I’ve never owned a batis but they look soooo good haha
@@mattih yes sir they do, I personally love Daniel Schiffer video's look and he often uses few Batis prime lenses. What would I do to put my hands on one of them!
SO excited for the new podcast! MATTI IS FULL OF SECRETS 🤯
Just heard Issac say I can take my FX3 underwater. I’m looking forward to making snorkeling videos. 👍😁
I have the old 24-70mm. I have to hold it at full arms length to vlog. That’s heavy after a few minutes.
Love the boxy t! Just picked one up ⚡️
Oh heck yea 🙌🏻 you will love it 😊
24-70 is my most important lens it’s for run and gun situation most versatile and the very decent low light great for events and parties scenario I wouldn’t trade it up for anything else my work horse bread and butter lens
Reasons I just picked up the Sigma 28-70/2.8 as it’s 470g. So small and light. When I need wider, I’ll choose a wide lens
Same here I own a 24-70 f2.8, it’s boring but it gets the job done if you need an all round high quality zoom lens.
If you shot weddings, 24-70 essential. 50 1.2 is amazing too
Never once used one for a wedding and I filmed a bunch 😂
I shot weddings, but never thought of 24-70, because it's too heavy for my gimbal and of coz my arms.
That ad for your brand was slick! Very nice, matti!
I’ve got a tamron 24-70mm. Beast of a lens 🔥🔥
There all freaking good 🙌🏻
Last 30 seconds were legendary
Thank you! Ive never understood the hype around the 24-70. I’ve always felt like it was uninteresting average thing.
I have the Tamron 28-75 but have been looking to upgrade potentially! Love hearing your thoughts on the new 24-70, it seems like beast! Might have to get it! 💯✔️🔥
I always felt that the 24-70 was the must-have lens for any system but now that I have one , these days I just use my 50mm more than anything.
sitting here looking at my 50mm 1.2 like hmmm
That’s 3 of us 😂 50mm 🤙🏽
it does seem to have a filmlike look on the fx3 and fx6
Thats the only one I own lmao
Great Video! Entertaining and informative.
Mattie I like your fashion portraits simple yet cool
Seriously, I am impressed that you could jump up on the couch like that in skinny jeans and run away. But I do find the 24 to 70 to be a good all around lens especially when shooting on location.
Yes!! This is so true!!
What sound panels are you using in your studio? I just got a space and I'm looking for something like them
Let me tell you a 24-70mm is a vacation lense if you prefer taking more portraits. i have a 16-35mm for vacations i can take my portraits and my landscape\travel photography shots. Basically you dont have to carry all your kit at your vacations. these lenses are cool.
For that price I’d rather go for the Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8.
Agreed
Sony does make shaper lens than tamron and that lens is bigger. For people that won't use higher than 70mm, i would understand why.
I bought the Tamron 28-250mm and i love it so yeah, i with you with ''team Tamron''
Please don't tell Us soon that you're coming back to Canon :D I have 24-70 original one... Pretty good stuff...
Haha not right now at least 😂 they are sleeping with their cameras
Nothing beats in portability to the Sigma 28-70mm F2.9 DG DN C. Only 470gr and it's tiny compared to that one.
Isn't that f2.8 not f2.9? But yes it's also the cheapest as it's now a third of the price of the new Sony GM ii.
Hey Matti, isn't the 24-70mm referred to as the best when it comes to car photography?
Maybe? I dunno 🤷🏼♂️
Watching and thinking with your clothing brand you should bring back a limited edition one with the learn make repeat and travel feels design under your new clothing brand
Love the guy with the GB hat!
13th. Which is better than first.
didn't know Elijah Wood is working with Matti
Nice ending! Very Classy xD
You right man, i cant find nothing special about the zoom lens 🎉
3:05 does anyone know of a good engineering video that would explain how this system works?
New podcast? What about the old one? I miss it. It's been so long😢
Matti Haapojaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
👋
That ending way great!
What lense are you using there? edit 16-35! Which one did you take?
Totally agree on the 24-70, just nothing special about it - sure you can get special images, but not special because of the lens. I will say though that I still keep one just for those times that I feel lazy and only want to carry around a single body+lens. But there's nothing like a 14mm, or an f1.2-1.4 prime, or a real telephoto zoom for that special sauce you can't get with a 24-70.
I bought the 24-70 f2.8 Gmaster in Dec... Now there is a version ii? ugh annoyed...
That couch flip at the end was sick.
Parkour!
What do you mostly use your prime lens for?
Completely agree! I rented one once and ended up not using it.
Sweet video mate. ISSAC! who is this guy?? Haven't been introduced properly ;~) He's hilarious Matti 😊😂
Switzerland is missing in your delivery's list !! damn !!
I just thought about how hilarious your logo is. You silly for that.
Just got to full frame with a a7IV and a sigma art 24-70 and i understand the average at everything . I miss the 85 1.8 i had on an aps c with the nifty fifty from canon for example big time . 24-70 is a swiss knife , nothing more , nothing less .
I also have the A7iv. Got the 35 gm to start and added the 70-200 2.8 mk2 . I have zero regrets with those two combos. Maybe someday I get the 16-35 but not anytime soon
The 24-70mm is over hyped. It encompasses the most common focal lengths, but it doesn't do them as well as their prime counterparts. I'd be willing to pay $3k for one IF AND ONLY IF, they could get it to a f/2 or f/1.8. Beyond that, I'll get a used 24mm GM and a 85mm.
Agree on the “average” appreciation… 24 to 135 is prime faster lenses territory…