Video

Why is this surprising? Space and time are relative?

I'm not saying this is possible or impossible but where does the energy an matter for the multiple universes come from? Is the thrown dart possibility creating a new universe? If not then are there trillions of worlds just ready to accept the various choices we make and stear them through yet another universe every time we make a decision? If so. . . How is this decision being communicated across multiple universes? The universe that we are aware of is pretty large. If there are countless others "out there" . . . how is the information inside our universe crossing over into others that are at least one universe deapth away from us? How is that happening? How fast is it happening? How many times can it happen at once? Where is the energy to move that information from one place to another even coming from? Or are this multiple universes somehow in dimensions that are not distant from us but right here with us but in ways that we cannot see or experience them? I love this stuff but the more they talk, the more complex my questions get inside my head.

I think that consciousness is a fundamental force of nature, and psychedelics are just a way to break the barriers between "thought" and "reality".

No

So we can’t observe a particle’s objective reality. Whatever we observe is a matter of one’s relation to the particle. (Very mysterious how that might be the case. ) As far as observations of entangled particles are concerned this doesn’t seem to be the case. If one of the entangled particles is in LA and the other is in NYC and one observer Abe is on the west coast and another, Bob, is on the east coast are the particles’ states dependent on their relation to Abe and Bob? Let’s say Abe and Bob have decided to determine their particle’s spin at a predetermined time. Abe takes a measurement at that time and Bob takes his one second later. If it always turns out that the two particles register the opposite spin from one another, it seems to me, the observers relation to the particle must be inconsequential.

Yeah I really don't see how what this guy is talking about isn't just Many Worlds. I wish Brian had pressed harder on that but he's just too polite.

What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.

Study is not fashion...this is improper video

I don"t understand Carrol's answer to this question at 14:37

predictability and determinism are not one and the same

Any chaotic system and only a chaotic system has consciousness of some sort. But it needs to be chaotic (positive feedback loops). The weather qualifies.

Did ES just say that the Vietnam War was evil - and then call Henry Kissinger his best friend?

Truths come to me in my dreams as messages. I.also get visitations, Astral travel and have had a few lucid dreams. I've also removed myself from a dream, and seen myself in bed sleeping. I can remember a few dreams from childhood, but can't remember what I wore last week...jk. Our minds are fascinating, but I believe our bio field's reach plays a part as well.

My name is Marco Biagini and I am a physicist; I would like to explain the “observation” problem in quantum mechanics because it is often misunderstood even by many physicists. In quantum mechanics the state of a physical system is described by the wave function and does not have defined values ​​for all the physical quantities measurable on it; on the other hand, only the probability distributions relating to the measurable values ​​for these quantities are defined. Once the measurement has been carried out, the system will have a defined value in relation to the measured quantity, and this involves a radical modification of its wave function; in fact the wave function generally describes infinite possibilities while for an event to take place, it is necessary that the wave function assigns a probability of 100% to a single possibility and 0% probability to all the others. If all other results are not eliminated by imposing the collapse "by hand" on the wave function, the predictions of subsequent measurements on the same system will be wrong. The transition between a state that describes many possibilities to a state that describes only one possibility is called “collapse of the wave function”. The time evolution of the wave function is determined by Schrödinger's equation, but this equation never determines the collapse of the wave function, which instead is imposed by the physicist "by hand"; the collapse represents a violation of the Schrödinger equation, and the cause of the collapse is therefore attributable only to an agent not described by the Schrödinger equation itself. The open problem in quantum physics is that the cause of the transition between the indeterminate state and the determined state, cannot be traced back to any physical interaction, because all known physical interactions are already included in the Schrödinger's equation; in fact, the collapse of the wave function is a violation of the Schrodinger's equation, i.e. a violation of the most fundamental laws of physics and therefore the cause of the collapse cannot be determined by the same laws of physics, in particular, it cannot be determined by the interactions already included in the Schrodinger's equation. After one century of debates, the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is still open and still represents the crucial problem for all interpretations of quantum mechanics. In fact, on the one hand it represents a violation of the Schrodinger equation, that is, a violation of the fundamental laws of physics. On the other hand, it is necessary for the laws of quantum physics to make sense, and to be applied in the interpretation and prediction of the phenomena we observe. Indeed, since the wave function represents infinite possibilities, without the collapse there would be no event; for there to be an event, then there must be one possibility that is actualized by canceling all other possibilities. This is the inescapable contradiction against which, all attempts to reconcile quantum physics with realism, break. Quantum mechanics does not describe reality as something that exists objectively at every instant, but as a collection of events isolated in time (i.e. the phenomena we observe at the very moment in which we observe them), while among these events there are only infinite possibilities and there is no continuity between events. In fact, the properties of a physical system are determined only after the collapse of the wave function; when the properties of the system are not yet determined, the system is not real, but only an idea, a hypothesis. Only when collapse occurs do properties become real because they take on a definite value. It makes no sense to assume that the system exists but its properties are indeterminate, because properties are an intrinsic aspect of the system itself; for example, there can be no triangle with indeterminate sides and no circle with indeterminate radius. Indeterminate properties means that properties do not exist which implies that the system itself does not exist; actually photons, electrons and quantum particles in general are just the name we give to some mathematical equations. The collapse represents the transition from infinite hypothetical possibilities to an actual event. Quantum mechanics is therefore incompatible with realism (that's why Einstein never accepted quantum mechanics); all alleged attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics with realism are flawed. The collapse of the wave function represents a non-physical event, since it violates the fundamental laws of physics, and can be associated with the only non-physical event we know of, consciousness. Therefore, events can only exist when consciousness is involved in the process. However, the fact that properties are created when a conscious mind observes the system in no way implies that it is the observer or his mind that creates those properties and causes the collapse; I regard this hypothesis as totally unreasonable (by the way, the universe is supposed to have existed even before the existence of humans). The point is that there must be a correlation between the existence of an event (associated to the collapse of the wave function =violation of the physical laws) and the interaction with a non-physical agent (the human mind); however, correlation does not mean causation because the concomitance of two events does not imply a causal link. No cause of collapse is necessary in an idealistic perspective, which assumes that there is no mind-independent physical reality and that physical reality exists as a concept in the mind of God that directly creates the phenomena we observe in our mind (any observed phenomenon is a mental experience) ; the collapse of the wave function is only a representation of God's act of creation in our mind of the observed phenomenon and is an element of the algorithm we have developed to make predictions and describe the phenomena we observe. This is essentially the view of the Irish philosopher George Berkeley, and in this view God is not only the Creator, but also the Sustainer of the universe. The fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics is that reality is not described as a continuum of events but as isolated events, and this is in perfect agreement with the idealistic view which presupposes that what we call "universe" is only the set of our sensory perceptions and that the idea that an external physical reality exists independently of the mind is only the product of our imagination; in other words, the universe is like a collective dream created by God in our mind. Idealism provides the only logically consistent interpretation of quantum mechanics, but most physicists do not accept idealism because it contradicts their personal beliefs, so they prefer an objectively wrong interpretation that gives them the illusion that quantum mechanics is compatible with realism.

I know what r you saying, hmmmm

Wut

The Awesome mind of God Creator of the Universe. John 3:16. The more I learn the more Science proves God the creator 🎚🙏

How many times has that across time entanglement been replicated??

I wish it was easily accessible so I could heal and get off antidepressants. It’s insane that one could get thrown in jail for it

No. It doesn't imply that, at all.

Seems to me that the deeper we dig , the less we find ,up to the point that fundamental "particles" are just bits of interaction information ? I wonder why that is.

I have noticed for the last 5 or 6 weeks or so a few of these have been hanging around an old shed in my backyard in the woods. Why would they be hanging out around there and going into it?

Vain attempt at making AI seem non threatening.

Good edit

you are wrong about GRAVITY by using trampoline... it is totally wrong...

Is this old guy is talking about a GPT1 model? And who else thinks owns cat! 😂

Is anyone else living in the same universe as me where Sean Caroll has gotten chubby?

Our scientists are equal to babbling kids playing in a sandbox

Audhu billahi minash shaitain rajim

Coming soon to the U tube (God's living universe) Will tell you about everything in this universe man should know about. 💥🌎🙏

Intelligence is NOT a social construct. Its drfinition is valid in much a greater dominium.

From beginning of BigBang to the end of the universe, From beginning of Blackhole to the end of Hawking Radiation, Are...... Implications of...... Nature...... Reality. Quantum Information and Quantum Entanglement are Fundamental. Quantum Mind emerge.. Collection, Pattern of QuInfo and QuEntang. Quantum Body emerge.. Std.Model emerge, DNA, Protein synthesis. Mind and Body entanglement.. Consciousness emerge. Spacetime emerge.. Mass.. Energy.. Wave fn. Decoherence. Mathematics Emerge.. Intrinsic in the fabric of the emergence. Holographic Principle.. Information Conservation, Energy Conservation.

Very interesting interview .. This channel is priceless and Brian's presentation and hosting are Phenomenal. P.S. Brian's smile was in a superposition until Sean measured it @ 12:44 :D

Slow ov time like the eye ov a fly 🪰

Proving continuum hypothesis , proving inconsistency in ZFC , constructing ZFC from naive set specification , resolving Russell's paradox , constructing infinite number system , construct and ensure overall consistent mathematical universe and developing arithmetic system - edition 5 May 2024 LicenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Please refer to ResearchGate , I have solved all set theory problems xDD

With all you all know ,you all know, so little , of living life. I hope so day before this life journey is over you all will see truth of soul and life. But very interesting and entertaining. All this science .

Salam ! Take a look at MOHAMMED'S HOLY PROPHET PURIFIED FAMILY 👪 BOOKS 📚 knowledge abt UNIVERSE

It is very funny, that most of you all make fun of God and Bible. But , still you really can't tell the world of anything of real usse, for daily life. But good try.

But, even with all we think we know, it still all theory. Lol, but it is all interesting and I do enjoy all the science. But , the bidle is still more true the most all science.

If particles can be quantum entangled over time, everything you do is replicated somewhere else and outcomes can be altered, there and by definition here. 😮

She is beautiful

Math is invented by intelligent beings. It is not discovered. It is just a tool to explore Reality and discover parts of Reality. It might be as beautiful to some people as hammers and nails are beautiful to others. Those inventions might be sometimes too advanced for their times but they are also limited on what they can do, just like hammers and nails. This is my view based on my understanding of the history of the wheel, steam engine, number zero, negative numbers, imaginary numbers, relativity, cannon balls; and little understanding of philosophy and it's history.

Physical reality is objective, but is still relative to an observer hence it is not universal.

The first woman was very great, but the second one was not really good. Very insecure, so sad to see...

Hello Dr.Greene I had a question regarding dark energy, I wondered if cosmic inflation was caused by maybe the creation of dark energy??It seems to be doing so good at expanding so far.

Olağanüstü giriş konuşması.İlk bölümü kaçıranlara(şu an için bana).Keyifle dinliyorum.Eline sağlık kardeşim.

[ Stephen Wolfram .,. and .,. Brian Greene ] .,. To quote a 'statement' .,. made herein! :: ''It's almost ''theological like''!" .,. Hum.,! .,. Hum.,! An INTERNAL existing ''being'' perhaps, { Us } .,. simply cannot formulate nor ''define'' what is externally existing out there in the ''universe''!" (?) Well.? .,.

The many universe theory feels like the equivalent of coding exclusively with if then statements...which is how i pictured games must have been impossibly made until i discovered gosub. I can't imagine nature would be so inefficient and wasteful.

I am just a paramedic in croatia no Education in Fiziks or space eksploration😂.But i watched abaut 50 or so Brian Green World science Festival Videos And what i wish to say is this.I am a Man 43 years old and i wish to say THAN YOU VERY MUCH to Brian Green and all the people that work with him for the bottom of my heart.You gave me the oportuniti to expand myself and my knowledge in my middle years.Please just keep doing what you are doing i am shure there are milions of people like me.❤

Fun fact: Carlo Rovelli once turned a wooden puppet into a real boy.