Video

Keep going ❤

I don't know if it's because I don't value this function or I just don't understand the explanations but I always have some difficulty in understanding Ne.

I think Fe is sympathy and Fi empathy. Fe will hug someone and say the right things without knowing what is going on with a person. «It will get better» «It is all gonna be allright». Fi is not gonna do that until they «know» what that person is really going through and struggling with, and therefore be able to put themselves in the other persons shoes. And then they will be honest and not come with things only meant to make the person feel better in the moment.

And - according to the explanations in this video - how is this at all different to mbti’s Ni and Ne?

Awsome!

thanks for the series

great

Straight information As it should be! thanks!

Amazing thank you!

You sound like Leonardo DiCaprio! 😁

I think with Essence you mean "Meaning" of the object. Essence fits Ni better.

I think you got the sympathy part wrong I think INFJ are more compassionate altruists I watched a video that distinguished sympathy empathy and compassion

Ne novelty getting in the way of my writing since I just can't stick with one idea long enough 😅 On the flip-side I'm constantly synthesising those same ideas, or trying to see if it's possible. So far I've only seen your Fi and Si videos, but it's been ridiculously accurate. Great videos and looking forward to seeing the rest.

The Tincers link is broken

Did Jung call it thinking or logic?

Here’s an example of my INFP coworkers use of Ni and my use of Ni tinged with Fi. She started to plan for the company Xmas gift exchange and I started to plan for and buy the c/m gifts to whom I love sentiment and care about three months ago

Also, Fe looks at society and movement of norms, ethics and morals of society

Here’s where I disagree with you. Fi like myself feel a subjective empathy as I feel bad for someone however they are not objective empathy because if I see someone feeling sad and ask them if they are feeling bad the other person will sometimes say that they are not which will surprise me because I got it wrong

I wish I had federal dollars to conduct a study of this magnitude

Geneticists need to study Socionics

I love these videos-some Fi for you 😅

brilliant summary, very helpful video!

Yeah, when I was younger, I was or rather I am pretty good at math but I had a problem with formulae being pulled out of no where and would need to understand the formulae in and of itself before I could use it or commit it to memory.

Does an individual's level of confidence influence Se's manifestation? E.g., if an individal has a low level of confidence in their abilities (the ability to make an impact, the ability to succeed or overcome obstacles etc.), would that make the Se user more reluctant to engage with the environment/compete or does valuing Se make the individual inherently confident in their ability to impact the environment?

Just a question, why did people wanted to see this the most.

We should just focus on 1-2-3 and outsource the 5-6

I’m constantly observing who likes who and who are drawn to one another. I say “are you guys friends now?” “Oh they are the hiking group” and my friends have such a warm connection with me as they are my emotional base when I need them so I am so sentimental with them. Here’s my judgment “what is wrong with this guy? This is what happens when we elect an actor for a leader! What do they know about what decisions are good for the world” 😂

I’m EII :p

Example of LSE: “they purchased this and they are looking to get profit? They have made their money since they sold 6 out of 8 and they will just not bother with the other two.” Got the result and efficient so will likely rest

I love LSEs speaking from the pov of EII ;)

Yeah here’s an example of an LSI- wants to take inventory of every computer in the company. Make a list of them and take note of what programs they run on if they are using different operating systems; speeds of each computer and necessary programs for each department might be some components to consider as to give some people in certain position of power or authority access to components like only a manager may have access to making time card changes.

I really appreciate the structure of your videos and the clarity you provide. The only thing I would add to help understanding Fi is that it makes judgments along a spectrum not strictly to come to black or white/good or bad conclusions.

WANT TO EASILY UNDERSTAND the Socionics DCNH model??? Read this condensed complete summary in plain English from pages 347 to 357 of Gulenko's "64 Types" book ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Why do people of the same Socionic type behave so differently? When 3-4 people of the same type gather to put together a puzzle, for example, some will be more active, others more passive, some more resourceful, and others more reserved, etc. With larger numbers of people an ever-wider variety of behaviors appear. Creating behavioral subtypes to the primary Socionic type. Yet unlike the Socionics primary type, behavioral subtypes are not static. But can change through a person's lifetime with sufficient internal motivation or pressures from unique life experiences. The Humanitarian Socionics School (HSS) have verified four to eight types of behavior within small group collective hierarchies. But for practical purposes (such as knowing what to look for when filling a leadership position) the DCNH subtype system is based on the following 4 functional subtypes with their primarily roles, associated attributes, and leading information elements (cognitive functions): • Dominant (Leader): Competitive; often recognized as the leader; sets clear objectives; ambitious (even when claiming the contrary); agrees only to temporary compromises with an eye on winning; acts decisively in complicated situations; has a high standard of performance; able to delegate responsibility; authoritarian but not in the details; communicates with a wide range of people while possessing only a small circle of close friends. (Reinforced through the linear-assertive functions Fe and Te. Fe energy resonates with Te engagement. Conversely, physical Te movements inevitably charges Fe emotions as well.) • Creative (generator of ideas): Change oriented; searches for new directions and allies; obsessed with originality; rebellious and individualistic; have the power of originality (and sometimes folly); pugnaciousness; ignores common standards; impulsive; dislikes following lengthy procedures. (Reinforced through the flexible-maneuvering (flexible-adaptive) functions Ne and Se. Ne (opportunities intuition) simultaneously resonates with Se (force sensing.)) • Normalizing (finisher): Accurate; compliant; disciplined; efficient; seeks routine work environments that require little flexibility or important decision making; patient; pays attention to detail; conservative; has a narrow circle of trusted friends. (Reinforced through the balanced-stable functions Ti and Fi. Ti (structural logic) as a set of formal rules is supported by Fi (relational ethics) which are guided by informal norms and traditions.) • Harmonizing (corrector): Externally calm looking yet easily embarrassed; anxiously hoping for the best; frugal and simple; emotionally sensitive, compliant; avoids conflict, irritable when feeling smothered; tolerant for the sake of habitual comfort; generous and able to empathize with the weak; allusive. (Reinforced through the receptive-adaptive functions Si and Ni. These functions are enhanced as pairs because they have similar energy. A state of Si (physical relaxation) activates the flight of Ni (imagination) and vice versa.) If the group has 3 people, instead of 4, then one person combines two roles. The most successful combined roles are leaders/idea generators, and finishers/harmonizers, since they are closer to energy. Although in real life many shades of Grey exist. When a small group is made up with different primary Socionic types, the DCNH subtype is primary and the person's primary type secondary in influencing what role each person will play within the social hierarchy. DCNH subtypes measured by the following 3 Polarities of situational behaviors: 1) Under stress and facing a direct challenge: Contact: Willing to accept it with vigor and excitement. (Dominant/creative) Distant: Distances themselves from confrontation to avoid freezing or losing a foothold. (Normalizing/harmonizing) 2) Projects and relationships: Terminal: Seeks closure, following through from start to the end, and streamlining. (Dominant/normalizing) Initial: Initiates and switches easily to a new activity, multitasking. (Creative/harmonizing) 3) External environmental changes: Connective: Reacts with a lot of sensitivity. (Dominant/harmonizing) Ignorative: Pays little attention (Creative/normalizing) Combining these three polarities, we get the following DCNH subtypes: • Contact, terminal, connective - dominant (D) • Contact, initial, ignorative - creative (C) • Distant, terminal, ignorative - normalizing • Distant, initial, connective - harmonizing (H) In real life there are lots of shades of grey between each of these polarities. Similar to how in MBTI a judger may at times act like stereotypical perceiver by not always having clear plans. (Terminal/Initial being similar to the judging/perceiving dichotomy.)

I’m an SEE and I think *some* of these are much more SLE in nature due to the difference in the Ti/Fe versus Fi/Te axis. (Makes sense, though, as it is an umbrella for two different types) That said, most of these are incredibly true… particular recreational competition and the need for impact. Great video!

Maybe the man who approached me in a dark parking glot asking me about the water asked me if its salty was a hurt egoist

The Holland occupational code for personality typologist is IAE. This is my code. Unfortunately there are only 4 other occupations listed with it. And almost no jobs.

The creative function is the right arm/ leg. The demonstrative the left arm/leg. The base the head and the ignoring the back of the head. The vital functions the heart and internal body organs.

I'm glad the channel wasn't deleted

I agree you should go on your own

great video

The Id is strong but left handed. The super Id weak but a part of the right hand (as preferred functions.) According to Proverbs 3:16 "Length of days is in her right hand; and in her left hand riches and honour." This means to make alot of money we generally have to get our left handed Id function involved. Look at INTP Elon Musk. Why is it he often gets mistyped as an ENTJ? Because he uses his Te and Ni block so much. Even though in his words, he hates being the CEO of Tesla. Now happiness and long life is found by extending the ego into the preferred right handed super Id. INTP Linda Berens is sometimes confused as an ESFJ? Why? Because she constantly uses Fe (aspirational) and Si. CS Joseph has observed (and I think correctly) that men are generally Id focused and women super Id. One reason why men make more money and women live longer.

Great video.

As an INTP I'm constantly watching ENFJ and INFJ authored CZcams videos on how to improve my social skills. To beef up my suggestive Fe. Interestingly INFJs benefit INTPs and INTPs and ENFJs form a pedagogue relationship.

As an INTP (LII) I am bad at Se hence like many INTPs I'm a minimalist.

According to Socionics 4-D model the strength of the role is 2/4 and the PolR a mere 1/4 (tied with suggestive for lowest.) Conversely we value the role only 1/4 (tied with the ignoring for least valued) but the PolR at 2/4. So overall the PolR and role are tied at a combined value/strength of 3/8. Tied for lowest overall. Because though we don't value the ignoring function we are actually good at it (3/4.) And though we are not good at the suggestive we highly value it (1/4) so are ready to make an effort at it.

The base function is often unreliable when the demon takes over.

This is similar to Enneagram 3 and 8

I agree with Gulenko that letters, and not symbols, should represent the cognitive functions.

I find Te deals with external procedures and instructions.

Great explanation. There is a deep need for Socionics to be better explained. and you have alot of room to grow.