This lawyer won the case. She also became the local DA. That is, until the Tennessee Supreme Court overruled the conviction as she withheld evidence and literally violated the 5th amendment in court.
That must be the most circumstantial way of asking “is this a cropped version of another photo”.... By explaining the point of his question in such detail and making the comparison, he allows for the lawyer to reply in a misleading way.
Jun 17, 2016 It took me a moment or two, But I finally understood where the Judge was going. The photographs were manufactured, cropped, and or blown up in a manner that could enhance or eliminate pertinent evidence. Said evidence could then be perceived or interpreted differently .
The accusation went further than that, the lawyer was accused of knowingly misleading the jury by editing the photo then suggesting it was of a particular subject, when it in fact wasn't prior to the editing.
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse? WITNESS: No. ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing? WITNESS: No.. ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy? WITNESS: No. ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor? WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar. ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive? WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
On the contrary. I believe the reason I understood the Judge was due to the fact that I am seeking the objective truth. Attorneys develop cognitive biases to present their cases more confidently (to help them win).
"I guess I'm not understanding the question judge" lmao she knew what he was saying and damn sure didn't want to answer. ..wish it would have shown all of it. ..not nice to piss off a judge ahahaha...
Shhhh! She was getting off of suboxeon "Whatever that shit is I am not a pharmacist or "car" dealer or they all went on a trip and got hooked and don't know how to use panoramic viewing.But they all KNOW, lol how to use panoramic microwaves.
Cropping is a common technique used in photography. Many times a wider than needed shot is used to help get the intended subject, then later (during postprocessing), the unneeded crap can be cropped out. Thus giving the appearance of a more zoomed in shot and with less distracting clutter. However, this technique can also be abused to make it appear someone was focusing on something other than the main subject of the photo.
If you take a wide shot (picture) and then crop it to only show a small portion of it, you indeed did take a picture of the small portion as well. Isn't that part of the reason for high MP digital cameras so that you can take a wide shot and still have enough detail so you can crop a small portion?
The issue boils down to the fact that a photo was taken by a witness and the subject of that photo was cropped out to make it look like the witness was photographing completely unrelated things. This makes the witness look sloppy and unprofessional to a jury. Considering that a guilty verdict has to be done beyond a reasonable doubt, if that evidence is the cornerstone of a defense, the defense looks sloppy to a jury. This would be like me taking a photo of my car against a backdrop of a building. My car is the focal point, but if it gets cropped down to one window on that building, it looks like I'm a bad photographer.
Don't crop photos next time. You might be trying to save the dignity of the victim but I think it's more important they get a fair case and trust the jury/witness to be sensible/professional about it as openness and full truth is more important. This example proves that allowing to edit can open up the possibility editing in a way as to change the nature of what the evidence and tampering. "Warts and all" show it for what it is. Show a zoom in but show the original image as well for context and transparency.
the way this judge speaks is the most common reason i get flustered in court proceedings. Just state your question in a clear and concise way so that i can answer it, dont pontificate and inject an abundance of unneeded prepositions and conjunctions, it only muddies the waters and leads to further questions which only slows things down and inevitably leads to incorrect or misleading answers, lawyers do this to try and confuse or mislead someone so i can see why its common for them but judges have no reason to over complicate their statements and/or questions.
Why don't people like this lawyer realize: the more they pivot from answering the direct question the more they make themselves look obtuse and dense .. smh.
Oh the lawyer knows she was trying to mislead the witness by cropping the picture with no relevant info in it therefore trying too make the witness believe he took the cropped picture when infact he didn't.
Let’s say I take a picture of a mailbox and next to it is a head, a head severed from a body... and the cop takes a picture of a river... Lol. WTF example is that?
To be honest for a judge he has a very poor way of communicating clearly and concisely. In the end it's easy to see what he's getting at and the lawyer is obviously playing dumb.
I like both parts, but @mijascrib there is no reason you needed to split this into 2 parts. it works better as one whole video. I don't know why you chose to make it 2 parts.
Lady, for the price of your education, you should have bought ten keys of coke and went in business, For you would make a much better defendant, than a attorney
Here's a perfect example of dancing around the facts on a yes or no question....fact is this is common place in courts today and few judges even care...how ever, if the jury is doing their job right, all the BS dancing will be exposed for what it is and truth will prevail.
Reality is shifting beneath your very own feet: what we have been taught about the righteousness of the Left or Right, Democrats or Republicans, this 'wing,' or that 'wing,' and we do not reflect the innate and basic social realities that are taking place before our own eyes. In my 71 years, based on my experience and the questions I have asked, and my eyes have see, we have been deluded over and over, from the day we were borne. See my past comments. When confronting attorneys in private and putting hard questions to them, often in confidence, many have said there is no real freedom, anywhere, in any party --- that they are in control and they hold allegiance to no one but their Bar Association cabal. Right out of Orwell's 1984, but only worse and complete. This: because all "isms" are under the evil rule of the "Humans." Humans that glorify every evil act they do as good and pure: it won't change, and we won't challenge it unless we see the real "enemy." We will continue to form "clubs" (social and physical) --- and expound those clubs --- with power and greed and evil to be used as 'clubs' against each other --- until this final Truth becomes too evident to deny. Keep in mind that Fears doesn't prevent Death, it prevent Life, knowing what is right doesn't' mean that much until you do the right things. Drawing on one of the classical social theorist Georg Simmel’s work on Metropolis and Mental Life, Berlant explored the concept of ‘disassociation’. Her ability to communicate with a wide range of academics using complex and imaginative frameworks of analysis is inspiring both on pedagogical and substantive issues. Other keynotes included Professor Jane Speedy, University of Bristol and Associate Professor Joyce Davidson, Queens University, Canada. This was a conference which not only provided outstanding networking opportunities and an opportunity to develop research synergies with international and national delegates, but in addition it was a great opportunity for me to reflect on a chapter I have just completed on Lauren Berlant’s work for my upcoming book, Genealogies of Emotion, Intimacies and Desire (Routledge, New York 2015). More food for thought from this exceptional academic. This was a conference to inspire the intellect, engage the senses, to enrich international networking and to light the way for doctoral, postdoctoral and early career researchers on the best of interdisciplinary research and to showcase this on the world stage. Cheri Safapou 17 hours ago Sacramento (and Marin, and San Francisco ) Family Court parents who can't afford a lawyer report that opposing attorneys and their clients routinely commit perjury in court filings and at court hearings. Sacramento, Marin, and San Francisco family County judges ignore perjurious, demonstrably false testimony by lawyers who also work as part-time judges in the same court. This video reveals that there is no enforcement of perjury law in Sacramento and Marin and San Francisco and throughout the state. I have learned that people don't care how much you know until they know how much you care, I applaud Topeka Community Conversation on Poverty #TCOP and the Community for being the power within ourselves to affect true change in a society filled with injustice, bigotry, and disposable people. Therefore it is with respect, I comment on Washburn Review Article " Domestic violence discussed at Topeka Community Conversation on Poverty". However, misinformation like this is more dangerous than no information at all. 1. Domestic Violence IS a gender based crime. 2. The majority of the homeless and poverty-stricken population is Battered Mothers and her children. [The mentally ill make up the second greatest population] 3. Domestic Violence is NOT a mental illness - it is a crime of Power and Control, Entitlement and Belief systems. It is not just the violence, rather a stripping of “autonomy” a basic human right. See Evan Stark, Coercive Control. “…the domestic violence revolution is stalled…” (Stark, 2007) “That the singular focus on violence against women masks an even more devastating reality. In millions of abusive relationships, men use a largely unidentified form of subjugation that more closely resembles kidnapping or indentured servitude than assault.” (Stark, 2007) Until it is acknowledged as the human rights violation it is (and deemed so by the Inter American Commission on Human Rights, finding the USA has violated those Human Rights (IACHR 2013 RE: Gonzalez v Castle Rock Police Dept. and Gonzales v USA, IACHR). Domestic Violence does NOT need to be “treated” it needs full enforcement of and criminal prosecution under the law as any other person crime is. There must be a clear separation of crime and therapy. Therapeutic Jurisprudence has infiltrated all aspects of this violent and human rights crime against persons, turning it into a “let’s treat the perpetrator” which in turns creates a plethora of “cottage industries for profit” and further denies, the targeted population’s access to Justice and “Equal Protection under the law”. Domestic Violence demands a community’s response of intolerance to said crime. Until the community takes responsibility [as clearly TCOP is doing - BRAVO] and then demands accountability and protection for ALL - Domestic Violence has been and thus remains - an acceptable “societal -norm”. [Values and beliefs]. Prosecute the Crime in a Criminal Court of Law. 1 Evan Stark, Coercive Control. 2007 “…the domestic violence revolution is stalled… “ “Men use coercive control to extend their dominance over time and through social space in ways that subvert women’s autonomy, isolate them, and infiltrate the most intimate corners of their lives. "the events in my life do not make me who i am. But my accomplishments, in spite of them, are what truly define me." Benjamin lee Just like us, Justice is coming, San Francisco: A string of court corruption scandals in California - including a ticket fixing scheme uncovered by the FBI in Orange County and an alleged racketeering organization in Sacramento County - are the result of mismanagement and incompetence at the state Judicial Council, according to a report by a non-profit journalism organization. With an annual budget of over $3 billion, Judicial Council responsibilities include oversight and accountability for California courts. In it's report, the non-profit Sacramento Family Court News organization cataloged a list of Judicial Branch controversies that whistleblowers attribute to ineffective leadership by Judicial Council Chair and Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye. "Under the leadership of Cantil-Sakauye, the Judicial Council has been besieged by controversy, including a scathing state audit showing financial and operational mismanagement, and allegations by the Center for Judicial Excellence that the agency ignores criminal conduct by court clerks and judges throughout the state," SFCN reported. The video posted with this iReport records the start of the first Judicial Council protest by the Center for Judicial Excellence "Stop Court Crimes" campaign. CJE has held ongoing protests at subsequent Judicial Council public meetings throughout 2015. "Mismanagement of the agency by Cantil-Sakauye - a former Sacramento County criminal prosecutor with no formal education in public policy and administration - is so consistently inept that a dedicated website, Judicial Council Watcher, tracks and reports the seemingly endless stream of problems and scandals," SFCN reported. The report includes accounts by two court employee whistleblowers who were fired for exposing serial violations of state law by their coworkers in the Sacramento and Nevada County Superior Court systems. Court watchdogs also charge the Judicial Council chief with cronyism and protecting her former coworkers in Sacramento Superior Court and the adjacent 3rd District Court of Appeal. Severe corruption problems, including an alleged RICO racketeering enterprise, have been documented in the two court systems. Cherie Safapou 1 week ago Roosevelt said, "One's dignity maybe assaulted, vandalized and cruelly mocked, but it can never be taken away unless it is surrendered knowing what's right doesn't mean much unless you do what's right" Terroristic divorce czcams.com/video/OAHgqW_lyEM/video.html
Robert111 first of you sound ghetto the Judge needed to know a few things for this major case and the prosecutor's office looked like she was annoyed that she had to answer the questions and when she did she looked like a complete idiot. This annoyed the judge.. if you ask 2+2 and you get an answer chocolate milk....... this is what the judge went through clearly the prosecutors office wanted to prosecute someone without doing their homework... as a I said lazy and Incompetent.
you want to ask your lawyer these question to prove incompetent lawyer 1. Do you carry malpractice insurance? If so, may I have a copy of your policy or the name of the carriers and the policy number? 2. How much experience have you had defending a case involving:_________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ and how many cases have you won? References: names & phone # 3. For "appointed counsel", Exactly what are your fiduciary duties to me as a third party recipient of your services? 4. Please define in writing over your signature the following legal issues: a. What is the legal character of the defendant? 1. Business entity _______ Sole proprietorship [Individual] ____ 2. Partnership entity _____ Estate _______ Trust _____ 3. Corporation _____ Association _____ 4. Manufacturer _____ Distributor ________ Common Carrier ______ b. Where is that legal person registered? 5. Please answer in writing over your signature the following questions: a. What is your legal theory of defense? b. Where is the court of original jurisdiction located? c. Who or what is the principal party in interest? d. What is the body of law from which the rule of law is to be drawn? Please include all Titles of the United States Codes relative to or ancillary to the charges. 6. Do you or any member of your trade association have a financial interest of any kind whatsoever in the proceedings before the court? Please explain any potential conflict of interest in writing over your signature? 7. If you are a foreign agent of any kind, by any association or practice, where is your registration of foreign agent status filed? 8. Are you aware that defense counsel appointed in a federal criminal proceeding pursuant to federal statute cannot claim any "official" immunity under federal law in a malpractice action growing out of it?
The judge seems to have a tortuous time communicating his ideas. Would be far easier to simply insist that each and every blowup/crop be matched with its original photo. In addition, if the cropped/blowup photo can't be matched with its original, then it should not be admissible. Job done. No argument possible. So, I would say the judge is doing a bad job here.
Rainy Sand I understood it perfectly the first time he asked it but I can also understand why some people might get confused, you’re 100% that it would’ve been better if he did that however I disagree about the comment that the judge was doing a bad job here, many people in the comment section alone including myself understood his question perfectly I also personally believe that she pretended she didn’t understand because she was caught manipulated evidence and didn’t want to answer Watch part 2 if you haven’t she even admitted it
You mean "dumb judge": 1) He keeps asking the same dumb question 2) He keeps thinking she doesn't understand what he's asking 3) He tries to make it seem she won't answer the question, when she is establishing that the question is irrelevant. 4) He tries to make it seem like his irrelevant question should be answered as stated. She initially asked the witness if (not why) he took that picture, and he said yes I took that picture. That means the witness clearly recognized the picture and knows that it has been cropped from a picture that he took. Otherwise, he would answered, no I don't recognize that picture, I didn't take it. So, the judge wants to know if the witness should be made aware that the picture has cropped from one of his original pictures, but the witness has already testified that he recognizes it as a picture he took. The judge's request is irrelevant.
It doesn't matter if the question is irrelevant or not, she has a duty to answer it honestly. She can clarify her answer with what she said, but it's a yes or no question.
I am guessing you didn't understand the question as well. Judge recognize that witness was asked the question "did you take the picture". He just want to confirm that this picture was cropped from original picture, he may have cropped it himself or taken the picture zoomed in, judge just want to confirm that in fact he did. Because there is a possibility that he may not have done that but still said yes he took the picture because it looked familiar. For example, when you go on road trip you see a mountain, you take couple of pictures, let say 9 and your friend took 1 picture of the mountain. A day or two later someone asks you if you took all those picture you may forget that your friend took one and would say yes I took all 10 pictures. Judge just want to confirm the fact that the picture was cropped version of one of the other pictures.
victor256in I'm sorry that you're so uncultured and uneducated that you believe that to be true. Let me guess, you're one of those pea-brained idiots that thought the civil war was fought over slavery ?? That's what people are taught in kindergarten, because the concept of states-rights and constitutional interpretation and balance is a little too complex for your average 5-year old. Nice to know that's as far as your education has taken you. Enjoy your illustrious career at the car-wash. That's assuming you aren't a welfare-leach.
thegrio.com/2015/02/16/food-stamp-fraud-black-welfare-queen-myth/ Check this link for welfare fraud…all white (lowlife whites not the real ones). Whites welfare recipients outnumber blacks and hispanics. And as per the tea/kkk argument the civil war was not fought over slavery it was over states rights (to own slaves that is..)
Oh, there's no doubt in my mind that there are a bunch of shit-bag whites in the mix. I don't like those "people" either. The position that the civil war was fought over states-rights, and not slavery, is not a kkk/tea argument, dumbass, it's an established fact. And, no, it wasn't JUST over slavery. You REALLY need to find a US history book that is above 3rd grade level, and stop incessantly trying to find bigotry, where none exists.
+vishal sharma Not the Confederate battle flag. It's Tennessee's state flag. No stars and bars, just three stars in the center. I see someone else has already explained this but it bears repeating.
"the 20 year old, how old was he?"
😭😭😭😭
The Father , did he have kids?
@@sirgoop4466 I like the joke but you seriously came back to your original comment after a month to make that joke lol
@@FlynnTheRedhead oral
“20, much like your iq”
The TV caption said that the victim was "...stabbed to death 50 times...". I would have thought one death would have been enough.
Sometimes you need back sure they can't come back as a zombie.
This lawyer won the case. She also became the local DA. That is, until the Tennessee Supreme Court overruled the conviction as she withheld evidence and literally violated the 5th amendment in court.
"thats' what i am inquiring about, if this is a crapped photograph"
Maybe a more simple way to have worded this question to such an incompetent woman would be, "Was this photo altered from its original state?"
I am not a lawyer and I most certainly understand the question.
Eh I don't but maybe that's because I haven't slept in around 20hrs lol
She did too, she just didn’t want to admit guilt
Yeah she was trying to pull a fast one and I'm wondering if the Judge was in the process of publicly humiliating the prosecutor.
I'm drunk and I get it
You don't have to be a lawyer to understand lmao but congrats anyways
this is the throwback analog version of those memes where a series of photos zoom in on something
That must be the most circumstantial way of asking “is this a cropped version of another photo”....
By explaining the point of his question in such detail and making the comparison, he allows for the lawyer to reply in a misleading way.
Jun 17, 2016
It took me a moment or two, But I finally understood where the Judge was going. The photographs were manufactured, cropped, and or blown up in a manner that could enhance or eliminate pertinent evidence. Said evidence could then be perceived or interpreted differently .
The accusation went further than that, the lawyer was accused of knowingly misleading the jury by editing the photo then suggesting it was of a particular subject, when it in fact wasn't prior to the editing.
@@imluvinyourmum Would that not (technically) be tampering with evidence? Rather serious I should have thought.
PM C the fact that you came back after 10+ years amazes me 😂
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No..
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
Silberdachs yes read that 10 years ago
Lol 😂
Crapped photograph. He got it right the first time. 😂
If you had 4 years of attorney experience, you would understand.
On the contrary. I believe the reason I understood the Judge was due to the fact that I am seeking the objective truth. Attorneys develop cognitive biases to present their cases more confidently (to help them win).
Not all attorneys develop cognitive biases, right?
"I guess I'm not understanding the question judge" lmao she knew what he was saying and damn sure didn't want to answer. ..wish it would have shown all of it. ..not nice to piss off a judge ahahaha...
Especially in a murder trial where the outcome decides the rest of a person's life.
She is just trying to be evasive and irritate the judge .. she knows it was crop not dumb just a typical Attorney
Asking 2 questions at the same time.. should first establish it was cropped then ask why
In common speaking I would say: BUSTED!!
Shhhh! She was getting off of suboxeon "Whatever that shit is I am not a pharmacist or "car" dealer or they all went on a trip and got hooked and don't know how to use panoramic viewing.But they all KNOW, lol how to use panoramic microwaves.
He just went: “He crap- cropped the photo”
1:30 the "craped" photograph - the judge was correct in the first place
You need to show mercy in this defendant, she is an orphan.
Poor judge goes home and drinks hard stuff straight up!
craped photograph :D
Crapped*
yeah i heard that too
He is not wrong . It is a crappy photo.
Cropped...not crapped.or craped.
@@jeffambrosia5678 crapped
You're tainting evidence to taint testimony. Sounds like a mistrial to me.
"crapped" 1:29
I like this judge!
Cropping is a common technique used in photography. Many times a wider than needed shot is used to help get the intended subject, then later (during postprocessing), the unneeded crap can be cropped out. Thus giving the appearance of a more zoomed in shot and with less distracting clutter. However, this technique can also be abused to make it appear someone was focusing on something other than the main subject of the photo.
She's playing extra dumb! She knows exactly what the Judge is asking.
If you take a wide shot (picture) and then crop it to only show a small portion of it, you indeed did take a picture of the small portion as well. Isn't that part of the reason for high MP digital cameras so that you can take a wide shot and still have enough detail so you can crop a small portion?
The issue boils down to the fact that a photo was taken by a witness and the subject of that photo was cropped out to make it look like the witness was photographing completely unrelated things. This makes the witness look sloppy and unprofessional to a jury. Considering that a guilty verdict has to be done beyond a reasonable doubt, if that evidence is the cornerstone of a defense, the defense looks sloppy to a jury. This would be like me taking a photo of my car against a backdrop of a building. My car is the focal point, but if it gets cropped down to one window on that building, it looks like I'm a bad photographer.
Even the judge still is looking at the box size pictures, they have state funding and a small view.This is why I THROW UP to it's a small World.
am 15 and understood straight away, this woman thinks stalling will make it any better?
I will delete any idiotic responses. I don't know where my videos are posted but I'm flattered somebody's sharing them.
you don't see that often.
Why didn't the state lawyers , object when the evidence, photo was presented at the time .
Idk why it bothers me so much that he says blown up instead of zoomed in
Tbh i didnt really get the question but when he explained it i understood it
Don't crop photos next time. You might be trying to save the dignity of the victim but I think it's more important they get a fair case and trust the jury/witness to be sensible/professional about it as openness and full truth is more important. This example proves that allowing to edit can open up the possibility editing in a way as to change the nature of what the evidence and tampering. "Warts and all" show it for what it is. Show a zoom in but show the original image as well for context and transparency.
Wow, that was such a difficult question!! Lawyers IQ?
she is obviously trying to dodge the question, pretending not to know is better than admitting a yes.
It was a question that only required a yes, or a no. Its not difficult to understand at all.
i dont understand your youtube comment, i deny that i know what a youtube is and i never left a comment there as far as i can legally recall
@1:28
It is Indeed a crapped photograph.
It is funny how she tried to find a way out of the crap
So expressive.
the way this judge speaks is the most common reason i get flustered in court proceedings. Just state your question in a clear and concise way so that i can answer it, dont pontificate and inject an abundance of unneeded prepositions and conjunctions, it only muddies the waters and leads to further questions which only slows things down and inevitably leads to incorrect or misleading answers, lawyers do this to try and confuse or mislead someone so i can see why its common for them but judges have no reason to over complicate their statements and/or questions.
The decedent sure had a lot of lives. She was stabbed to death more than 50 times!
Why don't people like this lawyer realize: the more they pivot from answering the direct question the more they make themselves look obtuse and dense .. smh.
Yup ... a bog of hammers - dumb as a bag of hammers - 😆
I don't know if 252makes any sense ?
whoa excellent judge I hope this lawyer was disbarred for tampering with evidence
THIS IS NOT A DUMB LAWYER, IT'S A VERY SNEAKY, SMART DEFENSE LAWYER. Duh...
Someone's offended lol. Must have been either you or someone you know... Either way you seem offended.
He is wearing a dress, and talks like a GOOBER.
Oh the lawyer knows she was trying to mislead the witness by cropping the picture with no relevant info in it therefore trying too make the witness believe he took the cropped picture when infact he didn't.
I agree. A crapped photograph.
I am not just ANY idiot though...thus my confusion
Ive seen this trick before somewhere.
Don't mess with law
Let’s say I take a picture of a mailbox and next to it is a head, a head severed from a body... and the cop takes a picture of a river...
Lol. WTF example is that?
It's illegal to alter evidence.
He’s right. It’s a crap photograph
What does he want?????
Sneaky lawyer, I think what she did was illegal right?
She was stabbed to death more than 50 times! DAMMNNNNNNN, cats only have nine lifes. Todays news is so badly written.
Beauty fades.
Dumb is forever.
Lawyers and Politicians are physically or mentally unable to answer yes or no questions.
Seems that way often... =P And they're "educated!"
what a tiny thing to make a thing about.
Nice. But leaves us hanging with no outcome
To be honest for a judge he has a very poor way of communicating clearly and concisely. In the end it's easy to see what he's getting at and the lawyer is obviously playing dumb.
Exhibit: 252, crap photo...
sure wish all our judges had this much astuteness.
Makes total sense
I agree with the judge...he does have point. Photos can be cropped to make it misleading....
Rivet...rivet...
Oshit smart
BUBBA.
I like both parts, but @mijascrib there is no reason you needed to split this into 2 parts. it works better as one whole video. I don't know why you chose to make it 2 parts.
I don't know why, this was 9 years ago. I'm a cat, what do you expect?
@@mijascrib yes
Maybe acting dumb so that she doesn't incriminate much?
he drunk,or high,lol
Lady, for the price of your education, you should have bought ten keys of coke and went in business, For you would make a much better defendant, than a attorney
Heh a crapped photo
I bet he wanted to say "Well, yeah, a crap photo!"
Here's a perfect example of dancing around the facts on a yes or no question....fact is this is common place in courts today and few judges even care...how ever, if the jury is doing their job right, all the BS dancing will be exposed for what it is and truth will prevail.
Who are you referring to as the "arrogant stupid attorney"? Who are you referring to as "she"? You have something wrong with yer head, boy?
The judge seems clear to me geez shes tip toeing the subject
Crappy lawyer i guess
He's a crappy cropper.
God bless America....
Yeeaah...
Reality is shifting beneath your very own feet: what we have been taught about the righteousness of the Left or Right, Democrats or Republicans, this 'wing,' or that 'wing,' and we do not reflect the innate and basic social realities that are taking place before our own eyes. In my 71 years, based on my experience and the questions I have asked, and my eyes have see, we have been deluded over and over, from the day we were borne. See my past comments. When confronting attorneys in private and putting hard questions to them, often in confidence, many have said there is no real freedom, anywhere, in any party --- that they are in control and they hold allegiance to no one but their Bar Association cabal. Right out of Orwell's 1984, but only worse and complete. This: because all "isms" are under the evil rule of the "Humans." Humans that glorify every evil act they do as good and pure: it won't change, and we won't challenge it unless we see the real "enemy." We will continue to form "clubs" (social and physical) --- and expound those clubs --- with power and greed and evil to be used as 'clubs' against each other --- until this final Truth becomes too evident to deny.
Keep in mind that Fears doesn't prevent Death, it prevent Life, knowing what is right doesn't' mean that much until you do the right things.
Drawing on one of the classical social theorist Georg Simmel’s work on Metropolis and Mental Life, Berlant explored the concept of ‘disassociation’. Her ability to communicate with a wide range of academics using complex and imaginative frameworks of analysis is inspiring both on pedagogical and substantive issues.
Other keynotes included Professor Jane Speedy, University of Bristol and Associate Professor Joyce Davidson, Queens University, Canada.
This was a conference which not only provided outstanding networking opportunities and an opportunity to develop research synergies with international and national delegates, but in addition it was a great opportunity for me to reflect on a chapter I have just completed on Lauren Berlant’s work for my upcoming book, Genealogies of Emotion, Intimacies and Desire (Routledge, New York 2015). More food for thought from this exceptional academic.
This was a conference to inspire the intellect, engage the senses, to enrich international networking and to light the way for doctoral, postdoctoral and early career researchers on the best of interdisciplinary research and to showcase this on the world stage.
Cheri Safapou 17 hours ago
Sacramento (and Marin, and San Francisco ) Family Court parents who can't afford a lawyer report that opposing attorneys and their clients routinely commit perjury in court filings and at court hearings. Sacramento, Marin, and San Francisco family County judges ignore perjurious, demonstrably false testimony by lawyers who also work as part-time judges in the same court. This video reveals that there is no enforcement of perjury law in Sacramento and Marin and San Francisco and throughout the state.
I have learned that people don't care how much you know until they know how much you care, I applaud Topeka Community Conversation on Poverty #TCOP and the Community for being the power within ourselves to affect true change in a society filled with injustice, bigotry, and disposable people.
Therefore it is with respect, I comment on Washburn Review Article " Domestic violence discussed at Topeka Community Conversation on Poverty".
However, misinformation like this is more dangerous than no information at all.
1. Domestic Violence IS a gender based crime.
2. The majority of the homeless and poverty-stricken population is Battered Mothers and her children. [The mentally ill make up the second greatest population]
3. Domestic Violence is NOT a mental illness - it is a crime of Power and Control, Entitlement and Belief systems. It is not just the violence, rather a stripping of “autonomy” a basic human right. See Evan Stark, Coercive Control. “…the domestic violence revolution is stalled…” (Stark, 2007)
“That the singular focus on violence against women masks an even more devastating reality. In millions of abusive relationships, men use a largely unidentified form of subjugation that more closely resembles kidnapping or indentured servitude than assault.” (Stark, 2007)
Until it is acknowledged as the human rights violation it is (and deemed so by the Inter American Commission on Human Rights, finding the USA has violated those Human Rights (IACHR 2013 RE: Gonzalez v Castle Rock Police Dept. and Gonzales v USA, IACHR). Domestic Violence does NOT need to be “treated” it needs full enforcement of and criminal prosecution under the law as any other person crime is.
There must be a clear separation of crime and therapy. Therapeutic Jurisprudence has infiltrated all aspects of this violent and human rights crime against persons, turning it into a “let’s treat the perpetrator” which in turns creates a plethora of “cottage industries for profit” and further denies, the targeted population’s access to Justice and “Equal Protection under the law”.
Domestic Violence demands a community’s response of intolerance to said crime. Until the community takes responsibility [as clearly TCOP is doing - BRAVO] and then demands accountability and protection for ALL - Domestic Violence has been and thus remains - an acceptable “societal -norm”. [Values and beliefs].
Prosecute the Crime in a Criminal Court of Law.
1 Evan Stark, Coercive Control. 2007 “…the domestic violence revolution is stalled… “
“Men use coercive control to extend their dominance over time and through social space in ways that subvert women’s autonomy, isolate them, and infiltrate the most intimate corners of their lives. "the events in my life do not make me who i am. But my accomplishments, in spite of them, are what truly define me." Benjamin lee Just like us, Justice is coming, San Francisco: A string of court corruption scandals in California - including a ticket fixing scheme uncovered by the FBI in Orange County and an alleged racketeering organization in Sacramento County - are the result of mismanagement and incompetence at the state Judicial Council, according to a report by a non-profit journalism organization.
With an annual budget of over $3 billion, Judicial Council responsibilities include oversight and accountability for California courts.
In it's report, the non-profit Sacramento Family Court News organization cataloged a list of Judicial Branch controversies that whistleblowers attribute to ineffective leadership by Judicial Council Chair and Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye.
"Under the leadership of Cantil-Sakauye, the Judicial Council has been besieged by controversy, including a scathing state audit showing financial and operational mismanagement, and allegations by the Center for Judicial Excellence that the agency ignores criminal conduct by court clerks and judges throughout the state," SFCN reported.
The video posted with this iReport records the start of the first Judicial Council protest by the Center for Judicial Excellence "Stop Court Crimes" campaign. CJE has held ongoing protests at subsequent Judicial Council public meetings throughout 2015.
"Mismanagement of the agency by Cantil-Sakauye - a former Sacramento County criminal prosecutor with no formal education in public policy and administration - is so consistently inept that a dedicated website, Judicial Council Watcher, tracks and reports the seemingly endless stream of problems and scandals," SFCN reported.
The report includes accounts by two court employee whistleblowers who were fired for exposing serial violations of state law by their coworkers in the Sacramento and Nevada County Superior Court systems.
Court watchdogs also charge the Judicial Council chief with cronyism and protecting her former coworkers in Sacramento Superior Court and the adjacent 3rd District Court of Appeal. Severe corruption problems, including an alleged RICO racketeering enterprise, have been documented in the two court systems.
Cherie Safapou 1 week ago
Roosevelt said, "One's dignity maybe assaulted, vandalized and cruelly mocked, but it can never be taken away unless it is surrendered knowing what's right doesn't mean much unless you do what's right"
Terroristic divorce czcams.com/video/OAHgqW_lyEM/video.html
And can you tell me the nutshell version?
Robert111 first of you sound ghetto the Judge needed to know a few things for this major case and the prosecutor's office looked like she was annoyed that she had to answer the questions and when she did she looked like a complete idiot. This annoyed the judge.. if you ask 2+2 and you get an answer chocolate milk....... this is what the judge went through clearly the prosecutors office wanted to prosecute someone without doing their homework... as a I said lazy and Incompetent.
you want to ask your lawyer these question to prove incompetent lawyer
1. Do you carry malpractice insurance? If so, may I have a copy of your policy or the name of the carriers and the policy number?
2. How much experience have you had defending a case involving:_________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
and how many cases have you won? References: names & phone #
3. For "appointed counsel", Exactly what are your fiduciary duties to me as a third party recipient of your services?
4. Please define in writing over your signature the following legal issues:
a. What is the legal character of the defendant?
1. Business entity _______ Sole proprietorship [Individual] ____
2. Partnership entity _____ Estate _______ Trust _____
3. Corporation _____ Association _____
4. Manufacturer _____ Distributor ________ Common Carrier ______
b. Where is that legal person registered?
5. Please answer in writing over your signature the following questions:
a. What is your legal theory of defense?
b. Where is the court of original jurisdiction located?
c. Who or what is the principal party in interest?
d. What is the body of law from which the rule of law is to be drawn?
Please include all Titles of the United States Codes relative to or ancillary to the charges.
6. Do you or any member of your trade association have a financial interest of any kind whatsoever in the proceedings before the court? Please explain any potential conflict of interest in writing over your signature?
7. If you are a foreign agent of any kind, by any association or practice, where is your registration of foreign agent status filed?
8. Are you aware that defense counsel appointed in a federal criminal proceeding pursuant to federal statute cannot claim any "official" immunity under federal law in a malpractice action growing out of it?
cringe
yeah they refuse to answer the questions
legion aire
goodluck getting a lawyer fuckhead with all them questions
Haha- if only all crazy moron clients made it that obvious with annoying questionnaires like this. It would be much easier to reject them on day one.
legion aire I'd love to be a fly on the wall when u pass a lawyer your questions🤣
You can only be stabbed to death 1 time
It says the woman was stabbed to death more than 50 times
rofl
Eric Sullivan for President. LMAO
Noob Guy easy straight through the back of the head
Nowhere it was being said she died after first stab. Could be 49 she survived and didn't survive the last one.
NODDLEXXX or the heart.
🌌🕵🏻♂️
🙄
The judge seems to have a tortuous time communicating his ideas. Would be far easier to simply insist that each and every blowup/crop be matched with its original photo. In addition, if the cropped/blowup photo can't be matched with its original, then it should not be admissible. Job done. No argument possible. So, I would say the judge is doing a bad job here.
Rainy Sand I understood it perfectly the first time he asked it but I can also understand why some people might get confused, you’re 100% that it would’ve been better if he did that however I disagree about the comment that the judge was doing a bad job here, many people in the comment section alone including myself understood his question perfectly I also personally believe that she pretended she didn’t understand because she was caught manipulated evidence and didn’t want to answer
Watch part 2 if you haven’t she even admitted it
50 50. could of done better didnt do anything permenantly harmful to anyone.
boring,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The judge has no idea, but trying to ask as if he knows. I think that’s why she isn’t answering.
🧚🏻♂️🌌🦅😉😝
Luv the flag Reppin baby whooopwhooop
You mean "dumb judge":
1) He keeps asking the same dumb question
2) He keeps thinking she doesn't understand what he's asking
3) He tries to make it seem she won't answer the question, when she is establishing that the question is irrelevant.
4) He tries to make it seem like his irrelevant question should be answered as stated.
She initially asked the witness if (not why) he took that picture, and he said yes I took that picture. That means the witness clearly recognized the picture and knows that it has been cropped from a picture that he took. Otherwise, he would answered, no I don't recognize that picture, I didn't take it.
So, the judge wants to know if the witness should be made aware that the picture has cropped from one of his original pictures, but the witness has already testified that he recognizes it as a picture he took. The judge's request is irrelevant.
It doesn't matter if the question is irrelevant or not, she has a duty to answer it honestly. She can clarify her answer with what she said, but it's a yes or no question.
I am guessing you didn't understand the question as well. Judge recognize that witness was asked the question "did you take the picture". He just want to confirm that this picture was cropped from original picture, he may have cropped it himself or taken the picture zoomed in, judge just want to confirm that in fact he did. Because there is a possibility that he may not have done that but still said yes he took the picture because it looked familiar. For example, when you go on road trip you see a mountain, you take couple of pictures, let say 9 and your friend took 1 picture of the mountain. A day or two later someone asks you if you took all those picture you may forget that your friend took one and would say yes I took all 10 pictures. Judge just want to confirm the fact that the picture was cropped version of one of the other pictures.
is that KKK flag in back? wow
What's with the CONFEDERATE FLAG?
Gigolo Joe the confederate flag is recognizable only by stupid people.
victor256in
I'm sorry that you're so uncultured and uneducated that you believe that to be true. Let me guess, you're one of those pea-brained idiots that thought the civil war was fought over slavery ?? That's what people are taught in kindergarten, because the concept of states-rights and constitutional interpretation and balance is a little too complex for your average 5-year old. Nice to know that's as far as your education has taken you. Enjoy your illustrious career at the car-wash. That's assuming you aren't a welfare-leach.
thegrio.com/2015/02/16/food-stamp-fraud-black-welfare-queen-myth/
Check this link for welfare fraud…all white (lowlife whites not the real ones). Whites welfare recipients outnumber blacks and hispanics. And as per the tea/kkk argument the civil war was not fought over slavery it was over states rights (to own slaves that is..)
Oh, there's no doubt in my mind that there are a bunch of shit-bag whites in the mix. I don't like those "people" either. The position that the civil war was fought over states-rights, and not slavery, is not a kkk/tea argument, dumbass, it's an established fact. And, no, it wasn't JUST over slavery. You REALLY need to find a US history book that is above 3rd grade level, and stop incessantly trying to find bigotry, where none exists.
+vishal sharma Not the Confederate battle flag. It's Tennessee's state flag. No stars and bars, just three stars in the center. I see someone else has already explained this but it bears repeating.