What is Zero? (Set Theory Definition)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 02. 2024
  • An explanation of how zero is defined in set theory for the purpose of constructing the Peano Postulates.
    Sponsors: NBA_Ruby, Antybodi, Federico Galvão, Mike Gloudemans, Andy Capone, Andreas Froestl, The Jack Bancroft, Jakey, Andrew Sullivan, Eugene SY, Tyler James, Antoinemp1, Dennis Sexton, Joao Sa, Joshua Furman, SirSpammenot Multitude, Ploney, Avatar, Diéssica, GhostlyYorick, Hendrick McDonald, horace chan, Will DeRousse, Star Gazer, Paul Linkogle, Julian Seidl, Doǧan Çetin, Thomas Kristic, Panos Tsivi, Jesse Willette and Daniel West. Thanks for your support on Patreon! If you want to become a patron, follow this link: / carneades
    Here are some videos you might enjoy:
    The 100 Days of Logic ( • 100 Days of Logic (Full) )
    History of Philosophy ( • Four Weeks of Famous P... )
    Ancient Philosophers & Zeno’s Paradoxes ( • Schools of Ancient Gre... )
    ExPhi Experimental Philosophy ( / @experimentalphilosoph... )
    Map of Philosophy ( • The Map Of Philosophy )
    More videos with Carneades ( / @carneadesofcyrene )
    Philosophy by Topic:
    Epistemology: • Epistemology
    Metaphysics: • Metaphysics
    Political Philosophy: • Political Philosophy
    Philosophy of Religion: • Philosophy of Religion
    Ancient Philosophy: • Ancient Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science: • Philosophy of Science
    Philosophy of Language: • Philosophy of Language
    Philosophy of Art/Aesthetics: • Philosophy of Art (Aes...
    Buy stuff with Zazzle: www.zazzle.com/store/carneade...
    Follow us on Twitter: @CarneadesCyrene / carneadescyrene
    Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Collier-MacMillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Dictionary of Continental Philosophy, and more! (#settheory #peano)

Komentáře • 8

  • @tracylynn1461
    @tracylynn1461 Před 5 měsíci +5

    The hero? 😂

  • @siddharthabanerjee6155
    @siddharthabanerjee6155 Před 5 měsíci

    Hey, I just discovered your channel from the Map of Philsophy video, and it was awesome. Could you please tell what font you use for the text in your videos? I really like it and haven't been able to find it.

  • @tomholroyd7519
    @tomholroyd7519 Před 5 měsíci +1

    Zero is the boundary between true and false. #RM3 can be constructed so that boolean (2 valued) logic uses +x for true and -x for false, and 0 means both true and false. RM3 is the best logic you can use, because it solves almost all paradoxical sentences, such as the Liar.

  • @InventiveHarvest
    @InventiveHarvest Před 5 měsíci +1

    Zero is not equal to the null set. The null set is a set that does not have any members, including zero, which is a number.
    We could say that zero is the cardinality for the null set, but to do that, we would have to be able to count (which we can't do because we don't have the natural numbers yet).
    All we can do is use the power of naming to call zero the amount of nothingness.

    • @gabitheancient7664
      @gabitheancient7664 Před 5 měsíci

      in the modern construction of the naturals, since zf, the natural number 0 is defined to be the empty set
      the actual idea is to associate each number to the ones that come before it, like 3 = {0,1,2} and 4 = {0,1,2,3}, so naturally, to have a base, 1 = {0} and 0 = {}
      also yeah 0 is not a member of the empty set obviously it IS the empty set

    • @InventiveHarvest
      @InventiveHarvest Před 5 měsíci

      @@gabitheancient7664 if 0 =[], then 0 is a set, not a number.

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams Před 5 měsíci

    Das Nihl.