@@user-co6ww2cm9kwell sensors and film isn’t the same thing so you guys are comparing apples to oranges😂 both wrong. Film has fairly large grain. Especially old film. So each “pixel” might take up more than one spot if you put it over the same pixel grid as the modern camera. So technically the sensor is better but that’s compared to film of the era.
A good film camera would’ve been better for the project in my opinion since it would have that slight natural grain adding warmth and be just as clear. I’ve always been amazing by good quality films ability to catch every small detail
The cameras are that way to save on video storage space, since they may need to save footage to be studied, it would require a lot more in storage to save hours of hi def video than it would to store lower quality video.
@@kevinballou7822 The kind that peers into the darkness of your soul and makes you wonder if you misplaced your vehicle or if it was merely a reference to a really shitty movie
Beautiful engraving on the lens. Things just aren't beautiful in this way very often these days. Reminds me of a post where a water pump from 100 years ago looked like a magnificent work of art and was reliable instead of just mass produced.
1.wear the suit 2.roll around in dirt 3.have quick run till you sweaty 4.Sleep with it 5. And take the photo in the morning without wash or gulpin coffe.that should atleast recreate some😅
I received this camera from my grandma about a year ago. She received it from her grandfather and it passed on to generations. So cool having a camera from 105 years or so old. I haven’t found a way to use it yet, I’ll need film for it.
I don’t think they make film for it anymore, I have a similar one from the 20s and the film that was made is either sold as expired or impossible to find made today.
Just air clean and seal it bro, the story and legacy is amazing let your childrens children enjoy that too. Dont give it to them too young though, I got the first ever mobile phone as an heirloome at around 10 and promptly took it apart, sorry GG.....
Very beautiful work! I don't understand why people are complaining over trivial details, I feel these videos serve more as a tribute to the past rather than an attempt to perfectly replicate it
@@TomCaltonmost interestingly, the emotional depth is lacking a tad. Not to say they aren't incredible replica photos. I just don't think the human face and body can mimic the weight of war without the war. Your model looks healthy and postured in a way that doesn't display the mental and physical exhaustion. Maybe before something like this- make him do exercises before shots, scare him, listen to stories of the men while shooting. Immerse in as much stress to get those emotions and posture
It's not trivial. Anyone who grew up in the US should recognize the issue immediately. This dude somehow made it all the way through the editing process without realizing there was a major issue with the bayonet in one of the photos.
There is one on his channel! EDIT: Ok, he didn't go into much detail about the process, tho. It was pretty much "disassemble the camera; put the lens on a focus tube (whatever that is)". It's certainly better than this, tho.
That's simply marvelous, the fact this lens is still intact and compatible with modern camera is just fantastic, really great idea and work , i love the photos 💖
@@PocoSaintFTW yes its just the Glass.. Carl Zeiss AG is making lenses since 1846 and always where good at it. So you think they couldn't make good lenses 80 Years later? 😂 Do you know we already had contact lenses for our eyes in 1888? So a Glass from 1915 isn't really that special tho
Y'all are having a stupid argument. All Poco was trying to say was photos have obviously improved over the years and it's pretty cool that 108 years ago they were able to make a glass lens as good as the ones made it today with no technology.
Truly man I wasn’t expecting the quality I was ready to cringe when he said he was going to recreate the photos with an actor on replica trenches, but they really are so good and the lens looks fantastic
It’s so odd. The scenery is all correct, the camera FOV is correct, but the image is so sharp, and I think the luminance range (not a professional term) is more correct and linear. Edit: I did watch the video, I know what caused most or all of these differences. I’m just mentioning them anyway. Nowhere in this comment did I say it was a mystery. “It’s so odd” refers to the “feel” of the images when comparing them to the originals. If I stomped on these feelings with the purely objective knowledge of what caused the differences, I think I would be missing the point of this video. It’s art. It’s not a science experiment, it’s art. Let me enjoy.
I've seen portraits using flash that were older and were super sharp. But I think it comes down to focus peaking, ISO performance outdoors and lack of qualityloss while scanning.
This isn't preservation it's the opposite this camera deserved to be restored and retrofitted to 120 film. Not wasted on a digital camera that is nothing in quality to film
@@Analog_Momo These old kodaks are not in a shortage and they're not that rare. Obviously you can take the lens of in a non destructive way anyways and screw it back onto the original camera later on anyways. This is a fun way to show the artifacts caused by a 100+ year old optics without going through the headache to develop film. I highly doubt permanent damage was done, yet we get to see a set of beautiful photos in the end.
Not in a million years would I have thought to do something like this. This goes beyond artistic photography, a way to capture history within a modern device truly marvelous
I'm lucky to own one of these Kodak's, it's a wonderful camera that still takes beautiful shots 110 years later. Fun fact:, while also a important camera to document WW1, it was also the camera to document the only exciting photos of titanic's interior. Taken by Francis Browne on his short stay onboard before the disaster. I love this camera so much, it's such a cool artifact that has documented so many historical important moments!
@@wazzupweek I wouldn’t dare call myself a photographer but your absolutely correct. Waste not want not. I once had the threads snap on my lens protector. My only choice was to delicately crack, the plastic on the protector and save the lens. This is also on an older camera from the 60s or 70s. Asahi Pentax k3100 Focus the force to crack the glass and gently remove it from the gromit…. Or continue to film everything from the perspective of a Marilyn Manson video😂
Consider using different settings for B&W, currently your camera is converting color to B&W, or you are in post, this is how digital B&W works. And you can tell, doesnt look like B&W film. Needs to be desaturated
This is really cool and unique and I flipping love it. If you continue to challenge the norm and produce content like this you will go very far good man. Thank you for sharing your gift and talent !!
@@DelcoImagery they're propaganda, not history. When flag shagging nonces claim to be "statue defenders" bcos they claim removing statues to abhorrent persons erases history. It doesn't. Don't be a brainrot, flag shagging nonce that thinks statues teach history. Simple enough for you?
Am I one of the last humans who still loves what capturing images on actual film looks like? It's kind of like hearing music on vinyl, digital may be clear and crisp, but the tones and warmth that can only be caught on physical materials has no equivalent
film and analogue photography has had a huge resurgence in the last few years, even in digital photography you see way more people editing for a "film look". you can even buy disposable cameras from Shein now and all major camera stores sell film and film cameras, you're definitely not the last human to like film in 2023
@tomcalton I just really love your content. Always so interesting and keeps me loving photography and trying to see things in new ways that get stagnant. Your voice is also great and relaxing. Win win. Thank you
As someone who owns that rifle and bayonet, I’m just bothered that he doesn’t know how to fix it to the gun. There’s a button on the side of the bayonet that you depress to slide it onto the bayonet lug on the rifle. Oh yeah, and, uh, the pictures are neat too, I guess. Lol. Great work!
I love the story lenses tell. Even though this was a digital format the esthetic from old WW1 photos carries though from the lens characteristics. It’s like when I watch an older indie film (90’s and before) and I see a triangular bokeh and it screams Zeiss super speeds.
its a mass produced item, which costs like $100. It ain't some "relic", there ain't no historical value in it, there are thousands more that ya can just order online. It's a camera, and him takin the lens from it ain't some sorta sacrilege. He's a photographer, so of course he'll use unique and interesting ways of capturing photographs! He even worked with historical recreationists to make sure that the things captures are accurate! If anything, adapting old technology into a new format and using it in a manner considerate of the time from which it came is one of the most POLITE things you can do with something like that.
This is absolutely AMAZING!! These photos literally look like they were taken during WWI! Just beautiful! Thank you for bringing the past to life for us! Brilliant! 🙂❤
The MegaPixel count really made the images clearer
Not megapixel it sensor size that matter more
@@udaygudise3793Both are important, especially with modern day sensors that can stand high iso
@@udaygudise3793 the original camera is medium format 😂 the sony sensor is smaller and clearer than 127 type film
@@user-co6ww2cm9kwell sensors and film isn’t the same thing so you guys are comparing apples to oranges😂 both wrong.
Film has fairly large grain. Especially old film. So each “pixel” might take up more than one spot if you put it over the same pixel grid as the modern camera. So technically the sensor is better but that’s compared to film of the era.
A good film camera would’ve been better for the project in my opinion since it would have that slight natural grain adding warmth and be just as clear. I’ve always been amazing by good quality films ability to catch every small detail
Better than a bank security camera
what isn't....hell I've seen weather worn chiseled stone images that are better quality than bank footage
well no shit? You are still using a good camera to take the pictures
Literally no camera has a worse quality than the security cams in banks
The cameras are that way to save on video storage space, since they may need to save footage to be studied, it would require a lot more in storage to save hours of hi def video than it would to store lower quality video.
@@extrum2941 🤓
That’s the cleanest WWI trench fighter I’ve ever seen.
Dude.
@@Newtoncountyprison Where’s your car?
What kind of question is that?@@CZcamsIsForQueers
@@kevinballou7822 The kind that peers into the darkness of your soul and makes you wonder if you misplaced your vehicle or if it was merely a reference to a really shitty movie
@@CZcamsIsForQueers yeah I don't know that reference
Absolutely stunning shots. Thanks for sharing your work. God bless you.
Thank you 😊
Wow!! Jaw dropping work! 🙌 absolutely beautiful.
Stunning and jaw dropping? Really now? I wouldn’t say that these photos were anything close to that.
God isn't real
compositional credit should be given to the original photographer. this guy did nothing interesting at all.
“Bro, help me”
“Nah, lemme take a photo first”
I’m sure there were plenty of hours and days, where the men had time to take a quick pic.
“What’re you doing?”
“I’m making a TikTok!”
“That’s a camera, not a clock, grab your rifle and follow me!”
@@robertdevito5001funniest thing I've read in a while
*the cameraman*
cameraman never dies
That is just way too cool- I love the marriage of the old with the new, complete with authentic uniform and equipment. Very well done!
Thank you, really appreciate it 😊
@@TomCalton❤love it ❤ please do more!
veryyy cool! for reals!
It really is cool
They got a divorce last week.
Beautiful engraving on the lens.
Things just aren't beautiful in this way very often these days. Reminds me of a post where a water pump from 100 years ago looked like a magnificent work of art and was reliable instead of just mass produced.
Thats really beautiful you’re a great photographer good job keep it up😊🎉
Thank you - you're incredibly kind. I appreciate you 🙌🏻
bro his bayonet wasnt secured on that last shot
He would shoot the bayonet instead of his target if this wasnt just for photo shoot
Who cares!
@@aclark210people who know how guns and bayonets work
Makes it more chaotic
@@Kombo4196if he shot his knife, it just a ballistic knife now!
your model is just too clean
That was my only critique. Great photos but the model is too clean
No grime on the face or anything.
Some twink from the modern area could never pull it off.
Exactly, and uniform was way to neat aswell
@@discorddoge304 yeah well they did borrow the stuff from the staff on site so it would be rude to mess and dirty up the neat uniform?
The actor did the minimum he could’ve done lmao. Posing more for Calvin Klein than literal history.
Lots of WW1 soldiers had high lights..
Garbage fucking posss it looked like he was having a good time
Fr
That was raw as fuck bro excellent job please keep up the good work 👍🏾
Thanks dude, appreciate it!
The soldiers look to clean
they need at least 2 pound of dirt on them
What are they looking to clean do you think? 🤔
@@CarrotUKWell there's a lot of dirt in the trenches. Of course they'd look to clean.
1.wear the suit
2.roll around in dirt
3.have quick run till you sweaty
4.Sleep with it
5. And take the photo in the morning without wash or gulpin coffe.that should atleast recreate some😅
Those are the Americans.😂
I received this camera from my grandma about a year ago. She received it from her grandfather and it passed on to generations. So cool having a camera from 105 years or so old. I haven’t found a way to use it yet, I’ll need film for it.
I don’t think they make film for it anymore, I have a similar one from the 20s and the film that was made is either sold as expired or impossible to find made today.
it has to be more expensive in auctions now😅
The film it uses is 127 film. Wikipedia has some good info on it.
Super take care try it
Just air clean and seal it bro, the story and legacy is amazing let your childrens children enjoy that too.
Dont give it to them too young though, I got the first ever mobile phone as an heirloome at around 10 and promptly took it apart, sorry GG.....
These images are WAY better than I would have ever expected. Super solid work!
Those were some great pictures you took😮
Thanks!
Very beautiful work! I don't understand why people are complaining over trivial details, I feel these videos serve more as a tribute to the past rather than an attempt to perfectly replicate it
Thank you ♥️
@@TomCaltonmost interestingly, the emotional depth is lacking a tad. Not to say they aren't incredible replica photos. I just don't think the human face and body can mimic the weight of war without the war. Your model looks healthy and postured in a way that doesn't display the mental and physical exhaustion.
Maybe before something like this- make him do exercises before shots, scare him, listen to stories of the men while shooting. Immerse in as much stress to get those emotions and posture
@@danielmcgee8637the video is about the camera technology, not the subject of the photos
@@soravsgoku123 I watched it. Any artist would appreciate the conversation of authentic emotions. You're not one, so maybe just shut up clownhead.
It's not trivial. Anyone who grew up in the US should recognize the issue immediately. This dude somehow made it all the way through the editing process without realizing there was a major issue with the bayonet in one of the photos.
Could you make a full video about adapting the lens?
There is one on his channel!
EDIT: Ok, he didn't go into much detail about the process, tho. It was pretty much "disassemble the camera; put the lens on a focus tube (whatever that is)". It's certainly better than this, tho.
Test
@@G-u-z-i-omost likely a 3D printed part to adapt the two components
you need a helicoid focusing tube. I tried several time to reply and explain how to do it. But my comment kept getting deleted for some reason.
@@JohnBomboy fucking youtube still deleting comments for no reason, feel you brother
Beautiful commemoration and great respect, love the integration of the old tech too! Great job.
This is absolutely beautiful. You and all others created amazing portraits. Keep up the great work.
That's simply marvelous, the fact this lens is still intact and compatible with modern camera is just fantastic, really great idea and work , i love the photos 💖
Not really, glass is glass and a lens will forever be thick glass that focuses light to a point. The concrpt hasnt changed in over a century.
it wasn't compatible. He spent time modifying it to fit on a modern camera
Meanwhile bank security cameras can’t even take a picture in 480p
I normally nit pick stuff like this. But this has to be one of the best uses for a vintage lens on the internet! Great job!
Damn you have some good skills man... Awesome Pictures.... ❤
That is very cool that you were able to combine the old with the new, and then take these incredible pictures. Thank you for sharing them with us!!
Ok
I swear to god these comments are made by chatgpt. Summarized the video and commented it with common to chatgpt /thank you for whatever/
@@2007_Toyota_Camry Ok
Amazing to have such a camera that old these days..
Amazing work. Thank you for sharing this with us
My pleasure! Glad you enjoyed it 😀
KEEP BEING GREAT BRO ‼️
🤠🤘🏾🇨🇱
That gave me goosbumps, beautifully captured ❤
Who could believe a lens over a 100 years old could produce images so clear?!? Great modeling job too.
I think it's amazing that something made 108 years ago, by HAND, with minimal technological help can capture more depth and clarity than a new lens
@@PocoSaintFTWthe lense is NOT the Sensor... Wtf are you talking about?
@@HansGruberX1 it's still glass? If it was full of inclusions and bubbles it wouldn't take a great picture, would it?
@@PocoSaintFTW yes its just the Glass.. Carl Zeiss AG is making lenses since 1846 and always where good at it. So you think they couldn't make good lenses 80 Years later? 😂 Do you know we already had contact lenses for our eyes in 1888? So a Glass from 1915 isn't really that special tho
Y'all are having a stupid argument. All Poco was trying to say was photos have obviously improved over the years and it's pretty cool that 108 years ago they were able to make a glass lens as good as the ones made it today with no technology.
Soldier leaping, and gas mask are stunning 👍📸👏🏻
The music in the background fit WWI. My compliments.
I love your compositions ❤
These photos are stunning
Stunningly mid
@@dense331 how..?
They really aren't very good at all
what do y’all expect is good? it’s decently accurate, just a little high quality. it was mostly technique they got wrong
Truly man I wasn’t expecting the quality I was ready to cringe when he said he was going to recreate the photos with an actor on replica trenches, but they really are so good and the lens looks fantastic
It’s so odd. The scenery is all correct, the camera FOV is correct, but the image is so sharp, and I think the luminance range (not a professional term) is more correct and linear.
Edit: I did watch the video, I know what caused most or all of these differences. I’m just mentioning them anyway. Nowhere in this comment did I say it was a mystery. “It’s so odd” refers to the “feel” of the images when comparing them to the originals. If I stomped on these feelings with the purely objective knowledge of what caused the differences, I think I would be missing the point of this video. It’s art. It’s not a science experiment, it’s art. Let me enjoy.
I've seen portraits using flash that were older and were super sharp. But I think it comes down to focus peaking, ISO performance outdoors and lack of qualityloss while scanning.
The field of view is not correct unless that body has a 60x40mm sensor.
Someone said it's just lens... The sensor is still modern...
I don't know much about cameras tho
@@mattmoy2000modern cameras do use 3:2 aspect ratios, but you could crop these to 4:3 to match the medium format ratio
Image sensor is literally a century ahead of the old photos
WOW Those are fantastic shots! What a great idea!
Some absolutely gorgeous shots
Not only the preservation of History but the respect and Care done to pay homage to it is amazing here
I really love history preservation in this way. What you did is amazing, please do more stuff like this!
It's not preservation if you're removing and modifying the original lens.
This isn't preservation it's the opposite this camera deserved to be restored and retrofitted to 120 film. Not wasted on a digital camera that is nothing in quality to film
@@Analog_Momo These old kodaks are not in a shortage and they're not that rare. Obviously you can take the lens of in a non destructive way anyways and screw it back onto the original camera later on anyways. This is a fun way to show the artifacts caused by a 100+ year old optics without going through the headache to develop film. I highly doubt permanent damage was done, yet we get to see a set of beautiful photos in the end.
Those pictures look amazing!
Phenomenal work. Excellent pictures.
Now I know how those old history photos are made
Not in a million years would I have thought to do something like this. This goes beyond artistic photography, a way to capture history within a modern device truly marvelous
Fr
Ok
It's not art. Nothing was created.
@@BaslightBatekeepBoyboss we have a Hater because I looked at the definition and clearly this is art
@@BaslightBatekeepBoybosssomeone doesnt know the definition of art
Really amazing! I think you could have made his face and uniform a bit dirtier but aside from the clean look, everything else was perfect!
That's actually PHOTOGRAPHY. Hell yeah. I'm a musician, but really fond of good photos of people.
I'm lucky to own one of these Kodak's, it's a wonderful camera that still takes beautiful shots 110 years later.
Fun fact:, while also a important camera to document WW1, it was also the camera to document the only exciting photos of titanic's interior. Taken by Francis Browne on his short stay onboard before the disaster.
I love this camera so much, it's such a cool artifact that has documented so many historical important moments!
Please do more stuff like this! These photos look absolutely incredible!
Absolute crazy photos...Thanks for the wonderful work
Oh my, that's so cool!! The photos are amazing, combining new and old.
It would've worked if you kept it on the original camera
Yeah, the 127 film that the camera uses is even still available as of 2023
It would’ve been awesome if they’d used film for this.
might be broken idk
@@wazzupweek I wouldn’t dare call myself a photographer but your absolutely correct.
Waste not want not. I once had the threads snap on my lens protector. My only choice was to delicately crack, the plastic on the protector and save the lens. This is also on an older camera from the 60s or 70s.
Asahi Pentax k3100
Focus the force to crack the glass and gently remove it from the gromit….
Or continue to film everything from the perspective of a Marilyn Manson video😂
@@Wetknees I am glad you are here with me. Here at the end of all things, RoachDoggJr.
your work is fascinating! How do you adapt such old lenses? I would love to see that process.
Usually glue and/or tape onto a cheap lense
he probably lied and just put the cover on his camera
It's just lense
By using another lens. It's kinda stupid
@@WalldoTheWInner you can get a sacrificial lense for like 20 bucks easy
Great shots! Amazing Kodak
That was beautiful... awesome project.
these actually look like genuine photos
Crazy how we still use them in war, just in the form of GoPros. Some things never change.
You are such a underrated photographer honest to god. this is INSANE
Pictures are outstanding!
Damn, this is beautiful ❤
Absolutely insane, great captions
Amazing photos, wow, didn't expect them to be that good
Stunning results. 🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽
Thank you 😊
Nope
Beautiful pictures, the only thing wrong I noticed was the bayonet in the last one
Yeah, that's setup for spread-fire.
Warms up the bayonet and gives you 2 ammo instead of one, win win
He also wasn’t wearing the gas mask correctly
@@AidanWendel How do you wear it? just looks like a sack to me.
@@georgeBPM112 you are supposed to tuck it into your uniform. Otherwise the gas will just go through the neck hole
These are absolutely amazing pictures
Absolutely stunning
These are incredible! Great work and appreciate the effort you put into converting and recreating the scene!
Feeling nostalgic after seeing this perfect work
Glazing dude
Nostalgic? There was another guy who felt nostalgic for WW1. He's pretty famous now.
Ok but he's so cute! I see he's a young actor, good luck on his acting career!
Beautiful could be right in a museum those photo’s
I reckon we should be able to buy these lenses , cause the nostalgia is far better than the filters
nostalga, like we remember ww1 yeah right
@@beamboy07nostalgia isnt only stuff u personally remember, its the longing for any time that has happened in the past
Fr I remember 1918 like it was yesterday
@Aqua2D Yes, it is only for PERSONAL experiences
Buy a common vintage camera thats in disrepair. Dont ruin a working one, get one with ruined bellows or something. Adapt the lens yourself, its fun!
this looks like an ancient relic
Awesome! Would love to see how this lens handles colors as well (considering it was made in an era of black and white)
WOW!! Amazing shots!
May they remain immortal
Those are awesome pictures dude!!! 📸
Way to take all of the beauty and art out of it
I like these videos because they're calm, interesting and a break from the louder other videos on my fyp
Incredible work in tribute to the past! 🔥🙌
Consider using different settings for B&W, currently your camera is converting color to B&W, or you are in post, this is how digital B&W works. And you can tell, doesnt look like B&W film. Needs to be desaturated
This is really cool and unique and I flipping love it. If you continue to challenge the norm and produce content like this you will go very far good man. Thank you for sharing your gift and talent !!
Nice work.great project!!!
😇
That's how you keep history alive.
Not statues.
whats wrong with statues?
@@DelcoImagery they're propaganda, not history.
When flag shagging nonces claim to be "statue defenders" bcos they claim removing statues to abhorrent persons erases history. It doesn't.
Don't be a brainrot, flag shagging nonce that thinks statues teach history.
Simple enough for you?
Tell us where the statues touched you.
Statues are cool shut up
Except statues should also stand.
Am I one of the last humans who still loves what capturing images on actual film looks like? It's kind of like hearing music on vinyl, digital may be clear and crisp, but the tones and warmth that can only be caught on physical materials has no equivalent
What
I agree. ( idk what bro is confused about in the other comment😂), but yeah there's just something about it, idk.
film and analogue photography has had a huge resurgence in the last few years, even in digital photography you see way more people editing for a "film look". you can even buy disposable cameras from Shein now and all major camera stores sell film and film cameras, you're definitely not the last human to like film in 2023
3 and 5 are the best pics of them all. Great job🎉
those are really good photos but the feeling and rawness is gone. there’s no pain in these
@tomcalton I just really love your content. Always so interesting and keeps me loving photography and trying to see things in new ways that get stagnant. Your voice is also great and relaxing. Win win. Thank you
Thank you so much for your kindness - it really is appreciated and I'm so pleased to hear that you're enjoying these videos.
Bro quality back then was at its peaaakk 💯
So freaking cool. Great work!
Beautiful. Just beautiful.😊
Wow this is amazing
Incredible pictures
Just simply beautiful❤️
Amazing,
Thankyou Sir for bringing a bit History back to the foreground.
God Bless and
Happy New Year
Thank you! Happy new year!
Astounding and what a great actor you can tell he is humble to the event
As someone who owns that rifle and bayonet, I’m just bothered that he doesn’t know how to fix it to the gun. There’s a button on the side of the bayonet that you depress to slide it onto the bayonet lug on the rifle.
Oh yeah, and, uh, the pictures are neat too, I guess. Lol. Great work!
Those shots look amazing
I love the story lenses tell. Even though this was a digital format the esthetic from old WW1 photos carries though from the lens characteristics. It’s like when I watch an older indie film (90’s and before) and I see a triangular bokeh and it screams Zeiss super speeds.
He decapitated a relic so he could digitally remove the color from a hi rez photograph
It's just sad what people will do for attention.
its a mass produced item, which costs like $100. It ain't some "relic", there ain't no historical value in it, there are thousands more that ya can just order online. It's a camera, and him takin the lens from it ain't some sorta sacrilege. He's a photographer, so of course he'll use unique and interesting ways of capturing photographs! He even worked with historical recreationists to make sure that the things captures are accurate! If anything, adapting old technology into a new format and using it in a manner considerate of the time from which it came is one of the most POLITE things you can do with something like that.
Amazing how this camera makes portraits that look sharper than a big foot recording
Bro is gonna confuse future historians
This was beautiful, thank you
This is absolutely AMAZING!! These photos literally look like they were taken during WWI! Just beautiful! Thank you for bringing the past to life for us! Brilliant! 🙂❤