Yeah you have quite a slim wrist. That's perfect on you. I have one now on my still small but bigger 7.25" wrist and I'm not so sure, but it's the bracelet and clasp not the case that is my issue.
@@Art_N_Science DJ36 is actually noticeably bigger than the explorer. Was browsing DJs with my wife to see which configuration would be best when the new dials role in.
Thank you for the video and the review. Enjoying my 124270. It’s definitely not a large watch, but on a 6.5” wrist, I think it’s perfect. Take the superior movement with classic looks, stainless steel Rolex that has rock-solid value, and the versatility of wearing with anything from sport shorts to 3 piece suit I’m thrilled I was able to get one so quickly. Best of luck to the other readers that are also looking to own.
I have definitely looked more closely at the OP line because of this piece, both for myself and as potential gifts. Also considering a DJ36 over a very obvious DJ41.
Yeah I definitely am not in the market for a sea dweller! Ultimately.. I think what matters most is that you feel something when you put on that watch each time.
Your experience 100% mirrors my own. 3 weeks ago, I went to a Rolex AD, and I really liked a 2-tone, 36 Datejust... I stood there in the shop, wanting to walk out with it, but I struggled with 36, because, my other watches are all 40+. It's a generational thing: older generations were used to the 36 as the standard, and our generation is used to 40+. After nearly a month, this size now feels appropriate, and when I bring out my larger watches...they feel REALLY huge. I still love them all, but I'll definitely say this 36 Datejust has recalibrated my own preferences and tolerances for moderately-sized watches, by historical standards. Cheers.
I wear 34 OP and got got used to wearing smaller watches. It looks very classic and I’m still glad rolex still makes 34-36 case watches. The explorer looks great on you
Thank you! I tried a DJ36 today, the first time I considered the 36. It looked really good. Just don't know where it would fit if I'm already wearing the explorer 95% of the time.
@@SoXFireBlade yeah agreed. But here in vegas that would likely be out on the strip, so "dress up" probably just means loud, so perhaps a Batgirl, Hulk or precious metal. I love the look of the DJ... but is it cool enough for the strip over pieces I already have?
@@aussieexpat a dress up watch to me should something elegant and understated such a reverso or calitrava. What are you referring are bold pieces with statement. They luxury sports watch rather than dress. The dj fits the dressier if you are going to a fine dine restaurant or something a bit formal or maybe a meeting. The hulk and batgirl fits the cooler bolder category. But thats my opinion and you can wear them the way you want in the end.
I 100% agreed with your sentiment about the watch being something you could comfortably wear ALL day. I have similar wrist size (6.25"), and I've been eyeing several Rolex watches between 36 and 41mm. While the 41 certainly looks nice, there is something cool about the subtle and understated nature of the 36mm, at least for me. Maybe I'm not a fan of attracting a lot of attention, but I feel comfortable wearing a compact, quality piece that looks fitted on my wrist.
Absolutely. I mean, it's undeniably fun to be sporting something MAXed out and flashy from time to time, but maybe that's not the right balance of concerns for an every day watch. With the explorer being the only watch only available in a smaller size now, it gives us permission to enjoy a 36mm in a world for 40+ monsters.
In this video your 36mm Explorer looks perfect, and I'd say it's on the larger end of the size scale suitable for your wrist. _(Size scale = 1. case shape 2. thickness 3. lug curvature 4. lug length 5. lug width & taper plus the all important 6. end-to-end or lug tip to lug tip distance)_ *On my 7¼"/18.4 cm wrist, my 36mm OP 116000 looks and fits perfectly. The above half-dozen traits are what achieve this.*
I 100% agree. Everything bigger than this is oversize, including maybe even a DJ36 which I tried on the other day which wears bigger than the explorer in fluted bezel configuration. This being said, I've not had any jarring experiences slapping the fat ones back on my wrist.
I have the 39, but got the call from my AD on the 36 so now have both. I have a 6.75" wrist, so the upper ends of my comfort level is 38/40. I do find on the Explorer that I prefer the 39 vs the 36. My wife on the other hand loves 36's in general, so I bought her some colorful Barton Straps and now she wears the 36 Explorer. If I could customize an Explorer just for me, i would go with a 38 ; unfortunately the rolex world doesn't roll that way, so you pick the one that you think is best for you. If my wrist were slightly smaller, I would probably prefer the 36. If it were bigger I would probably prefer a massive Panerai :).
I've had mine now for a week and I love it. I don't think its too small and I have a 7 inch wrist. I love wearing this watch and it now makes my White Birch look huge...
I felt the same buying a 36mm black bay. I thought I needed at least a 39mm watch for my medium size wrist and my stout, slightly overweight frame. Now I gravitate towards that watch everyday. It sits neat and tidy on the wrist; Feels unobtrusive without coming off weightless and dainty. the Black bay 36/ explorer 36 have the same flavor in my opinion. Sporty yet sophisticated. Large and hefty enough to have perceivable presence without feeling chunky and bloated. I’d even make an argument for a retro sized submariner now that I’ve seen the light of a sub 39mm watch.
The Explorer is a better fit than the Sub on your wrist. I think you definitely made the right choice. Also I completely agree with you about the all day EDC. There is something about 36-37mm watches that makes them very comfortable. You can forget you are wearing them but at the same time they still look good and proportionate.
Yeah. Because I take the bigger watches off at home, basically only wearing them out, it kinda makes me feel like a poser. There's an authenticity to wearing a watch you actually wear all day even at home.
It's going to be interesting to see if ANYTHING in the Rolex line up moves to the more intermediate 38mm range ever again. It seems like they are really stamping out 36 and 41 sizes.
That was a stupid thing for Rolex to do. Today the style is bigger watches. The Submariner they made 1mm bigger and making the Explorer 3mm smaller makes no sense. I like the 39mm better which was already smaller than the Submariner. It is now the size of a dress watch instead of a sports watch. I would rather get a Datejust 36mm or an Omega Seamaster Aquaterra 38mm version.
@@davidrichter3681 The overall market is actually slimming down a bit. Note the marked popularity of the bb58. The new Sub despite being billed at 41mm is technically only .2mm bigger, but overall projects a more slender look than the outgoing super case 116610. So the explorer returning to 36mm is another step towards a line up with more slender / classic looks. I'm going to guess the GMT eventually adopts the less bulky looking proportions of the new Submariner eventually and the milgause retires or is completely redesigned.
@@davidrichter3681 Are you on crack? They went back to their original size. Most people don't have big foot size wrists. Why mutilate it and make it even bigger? Keep it original. It loses the sparkle when you make it too big, good god. If your wrist is too big, buy Invicta.
Ha yes. And its got almost the exact same proportions as the ex36 just bigger, hence 21mm lug width. So not an op case, another unique case and watch. I appreciate they didnt skimp out.
looks great on your wrist. the 39mm would work too, probably, for 6 1/2" wrists and up. Not sure why Rolex doesn't offer the Explorer in a few sizes, since wrists come in different sizes.
I absolutely appreciated your take on MY watch lol the 39mm Explorer. I was lucky enough to have been called by my AD for the new Submariner around April of this year and I purchased while still being on the waitlist for the Explorer. As soon as they announced they would be discontinuing the Explorer I panicked and looked for a brand new, still fully stickered Explorer. I was lucky and I couldn't agree with all of your points in your video. From the moment I wake up sometimes I'll even sleep with it, the Explorer will be with me till I die LOL sorry for the long comment but wanted to share!
Totally agree. So wow man getting the sub and the explorer at the same time. I was about 3 months between and the explorer has certainly seen more wrist time. Have you found that yourself?
@@aussieexpat The Explorer is definitely getting much more wrist time and has become my favorite watch in my small collection. If I had to give up every watch but one I'd definitely be happy with keeping just the Explorer that's for sure. I’m curious to see if that's indeed the case when I acquire the new Speedmaster from Omega. I even wanting that watch for a while now.
I'm going to say it looks infinitely better on your wrist than the sub in this video. How you (the royal you) perceive the size of a watch on the wrist is massively effected simply by what you are used to...your "Norm". With patience your eye can adjust to any watch size and generally, if you give smaller watches a chance.....you may never go back!!! Thanks for the vid, great content!!
Looks good on for your wrist size, at 16 CM . I own the previous model 214270 @ 39mm and on my wrist it looks great, but then my wrists are 18,15! Enjoy wearing it!
Excellent review and spot on. The weight and low profile nature of the Exp 1 made it a killer EDC / work wear watch. It is dramatically lower key than the Sub. You got that part right on! They make a killer combo.
I’m sporting close to an eight inch wrist and insist on a 36mm oyster perpetual. In my profession I often work in cramped quarters and the 36mm collects fewer dings.
You seem to have a 'round' six inch wrist as opposed to a flat oval wrist so this watch looks just right from lug to lug on your wrist, whereas the submariner looks too long lug to lug, but you seem to wear the bracelet quite loose which apparently leads to more wear in the bracelet link pins? and one or other lug tends to hang out from the wrist when worn with a loose bracelet. I recently acquired the new 2023 40mm Explorer which is actually about 38.5 mm in reality when measured from the crown to the other side and as I have a very flat oval wrist at 6.75 inches, it looks okay as I have been wearing a 42 X 12mm mm Tag F1 for the past eleven years, which now looks a little clumsy compared to the Explorer as diver bezelled watches do seem to sit on top of a wrist rather than more sunk in like an Explorer with its sloping lugs and polished conical bezel.
I have a 40mm GMT master 2, 41mm Royal Oak, 40mm Yacht Master, plus a few other 40+ mm watches including Tudor & Omega. Picked this up last week as it was available in the cabinet at the AD, no list. I Had the same reservations over the size, but wore it every day for a week and had the exact same change of opinion - even on my 7 1/4 wrist. I can see myself reaching for this watch more often than the others in future. Great piece.
been collecting watches since the 80s.....up until the early 2000s the norm was 34-37mm for men regardless of wrist size, bigger sizes only became the norm in the last 15 years
I think we're seeing a reversal. With the popularity of the bb58, and now this, rolex (and tudor) are letting people choose and they are trending down!
I recently got the 36mm Explorer in two-tones and I did go through the things in my head exactly as you mentioned. Is it a ladies watch, too small and lacks the presence of the submariner and other watches I own such as Tudors and Omegas which are all above 38mm? I’m very skeptical I now keep it in its box. Not sure I’m going to be able to convince myself of its worth on my wrist like you did. Good job managing the dilemma yourself.
I'm looking for one of these and they are hard to get. The aqua terra and the railmaster are good alternatives . I like that there is no date and no useless extras like a rotating bezel. It's a masculine sports watch but with todays trends can be worn with almost anything.
It's very hard to put another watch above this unless you want something "flashy". It's great for sport, dining, formal or informal occasion. And arguably better at each one of those than any other watch.
The Explorer 1 just look so utmost perfect on your wrist! Thanks for sharing your opinion in this video. However, Im wondering, is that any special condition (existing customers or must buy together with other watch) to buy Ex1 directly from AD?. Thanks in advance.
Its certainly varies from watch to watch. This one was one of the first in the country as best as I can tell, so perhaps my AD was super sweet to me because my wife told them its my Birthday. My prior watch from them was a Batman so... they really owed me nothing. Who knows ultimately, I'm guessing its simply as hard as the current market premium implies.. So I'd say probably harder than a sub date to get without purchase history.
Seems like 36 is actually the perfect size for you! I have the same wrist size and I found that 34 is the smallest I can go and 36 is the sweet spot and most comfy. 38/39 is in the sportier look category and 41s for the stand out look.
6" wrist is made for 36mm watches, and quite frankly appears to be perfectly suited on your wrist. I have a 7.5" wrist and while it looks small on my wrist, I kind of appreciate it.
I appreciate your video. Most other watch channel just talks about the watch spec. It's refreshing to hear others thoughts and experience with their timepiece. I own the Explorer but constantly feel like it is too small and end up wearing the GMT each time.. My wrist size is 7.25"
Thank you!! Yes i hope to bring a little more feeling because there is a lot of videos covering just specs. I'll never do a real review of anything, just the feel. The explorer has become my number one watch as I feel a more elegant less in your face watch is what I want in most situations. Take a few photos of the watch on your wrist and look at them. That's what struck me first, how it looked in photos was much more pleasing initially than with my eyes alone.
. I just purchased a 2004 114270. Love the watch! I even prefer the hollow center links and the charm of the old clasp. Just something about jingling and jangling that I like.
It's my grail watch. I'm wearing a Tisell Explorer at 40mm as a placeholder until I can find and buy this Explorer from an AD in the UK. I've got a Rolex store opening very close by, so fingers are crossed! In the meantime I can sort of compare the Tisell to my SARB035 (38mm) and my Dad's very old Seiko SQ (36mm). I prefer the smaller sized watches and I have a 7.25" wrist. I think the smaller dial and case tell me "master craftsmen shoe-horned an automatic movement and these engineered hands and batons into this small space", whereas the bigger (especially the dinner-plate sized) watches can be built by any old fashion house building from a Chinese parts bin to lower tolerances. It might not be true, but that's the *feeling* I get. There's a place for big, even 'statement' watches (I have some chunkier models already) but for one understated watch to last a lifetime, this one seems perfect to me.
Yes! It takes a certain maturity I think to l I've this. Certainly not the status seeker, but someone that wants quality! I have no idea what the opportunities are like for store openings. A new boutique opened here a few months ago but I didn't bother trying as it's owned by my current ad and didn't want to piss off my SA.
Yeah it came out around the same time rolex was feeling self conscious and released the YM2 I think. Within a collection, there was always room in the sport line up to have a watch that wasn't big.
I agree that it looks better in 36mm, however I’m thankful that us bigger wristed fellas get the chance to wear the 39mm version. Even the 39mm there was a bit of an adjustment period to the smaller size then what I’m used to I’m very happy with the 39mm Explorer!
Edmund Hillary climbed the Everest with a 34 mm Rolex perpetual. Airking is a pilot watch originally 34 mm. Its a bold and brave move of Rolex going back to 36 mm as this is a true tool watch for mountaineers and people working with their hands. i got 2, the old and this new one because it just awsome
I like the old 36mm more with 20mm bracelet. The watch head looks too big for the small 19mm bracelet in the new version. Hard to tell the differences though unless you take a few seconds to look
Looks great. For those of us who started with and loved 36-38mm watches, this watch is a welcome return to sensibility! I got over big watches after having a Portugueser and Panarai about 10-15 years ago. I’m hoping IWC will make a 39mm Pilot chronograph again, so I can replace the one I should never have sold! I’m hoping for a better selection of good new watches in the 38mm range. 36mm works amazingly good with Rolex Datejust and Explorer. Enjoy!
It is too small for the average man, you just happen to have small wrists. It doesn't look bad on you, in fact I think your Sub looks quite poor on you, since it's too big. I think the 36mm is your perfect size, for most people 39mm is the perfect size. That is due to average male wrist size being around 6.8-7 inches. Embrace it... you're lucky... all the 36mm watches are so much cheaper and affordable, since the style is now 39-41.
To me, the size looks perfect on you. I have a small wrist, so this is appealing to me. The bigger watches like the submariner look ridiculous on me, but i guess it's subjective. Enjoyed the review.
Great take on an excellent watch! I have the 39mm and a 7.5" wrist! It's a great size, but the 36mm is just as good! They're both one and done watches!
It looks perfect on your wrists, 36mm is the original and classic Explorer size. I immediately knew the 36mm was perfect for me and when I finally got mine a few days ago it was confirmed.
To me 36 is OG. I wouldnt really consider the 4k unless it was going to be a one and only and i was simply a bigger guy. Im glad more people see it as an option.
Initially when they release 36 millimetre explorer I did not like it.. but after watching your videos it started growing on me we want to see a lot of videos on your explorer.
I think the lug to lug is almost identical to the sub, so it probably wears bigger than you would think a 36mm would lug to lug is as or more important than diameter on how a watch will look on the wrist.... You're lucky to find one at an AD
@@aussieexpat congratulations! Maybe that would be another interesting video - why do so many of us get into watches around the time we start having children.
The 39mm Explorer I, was perfect for anyone who had average / bigger than average wrists. I have 8" wrists, and it looked perfectly in proportion. The 36mm would look comical on me.
Great opinion. My view is 36mm would be more suitable for the ladies. Hope to see Rolex coming out with the 41mm Explorer with the steel, and also half gold version. You never know ...
A 36 mm watch is a sweet spot for 6-6.5 wrists. I have an explorer TT model '23. The best looking watch with value and prestige. Accuracy -15 seconds per month. 👍
6.2" inch wrist here. I've had the 124270 for 3 weeks and I can't get a comfortable fit no matter what I do with easylink or the microadjustment holes. Its annoying me so much. I need 1 more millimetre for the perfect fit in all weather and the 3mm clasp holes and 5mm easylink are just way too much. I've stopped wearing it because I'm not enjoying it anymore. Also 5mm is way too much for easylink. Try 2.5mm @Rolex. Please.
I wore the explorer loose for a year with an entire link too much and it was nice. I did remove a link recently and now it's a little more normal. But slightly loose is what I think this should be happenning for this piece. It's very light, so it doesn't need to hug the wrist. But agree. easylink is nice, but it needs to be less than 5mm. Some people will disagree by how small, I think 3mm, but a rolex glidelock is 2mm increments but I usually use 3 different settings on my sub. Implying perhaps 6mm of range is actually correct....
Actually I‘ve lately been to a Rolex dealer to try on the 124270. It was strangely small in the first place, but just perfect after a short while. I absolutely fell in love. Even with the metal/gold version! I was double surprised that day.
It has perfect proportions. It looks perfect on your wrist. It even extends out on one side.. We have been conditioned to wearing clown-sized watches. All my current watches are 38mm (plus outer dial) and above. In a few years they will look garish.
I've been enjoying this aspect so much. I felt very comfortable wearing this on a recent holiday to San Diego. Would not say the same about a flashier piece!
Wow. Great video for my current watch hunt. I'm in the 41 Submariner now, down from the SD43 which became too heavy for every day wear for me. Bought a 41 datejust (rhodium dial, jubilee, smooth bezel), but just don't love it. It sits on my bedside and I wind it before bed every other day or so. My wrist is bigger than yours, but I do love the simplicity of the EXP 1. Hope to get one on my wrist soon to look at it and feel it. It's true the going from a larger watch to a smaller watch is alway disorienting for at least a day as your eye adjusts to the new diameter. Happy you love this one so much. I just got rid of a Pelagos LHD and I regret it. Seeing this 3 watch quiver of yours makes me miss it more. Do you wear that blue Pelagos as a beater/fun watch? I have a blue Triton Subphotique I bought just before I got into Rolexes--had always resisted them as too flash, but now it's hard to wear anything else!
The pelagos would logically be a beater in my collection but since I actually where the sub 41 more, with the pelagos blue being a "weekend" watch, the pelgos is pretty minty. But my wife says the pelagos suits me more. Unless you've got strong emotional attachment to the sub, I'd say prepare for it to be replaced as an edc. I'll certainly post here if I stop wearing the explorer... but its just so much nicer to wear and honestly.. it looks better. The only place the sub wins is flash, which kinda means it's only a "going out watch". Which maybe is better to get a bluesy or root beer for such occasion...
@@aussieexpat nice! The Triton I have wears similarly. It’s not titanium though and I want that as an alternative to the Rolex from time to time. The Sub 41 is just about the perfect watch in wearability terms. But you make a strong argument for the Explorer I. I turn 50 this year so I’m also thinking of the new EXP II 50th anniversary. My wrist is 7.5 in so a bit bigger than yours. 41/42 mm sits just right on my wrist
I also think the same, my pelagos got some wrist time today for a little more casual flare but the sub... I don't know when I'd bring it out to be honest! Going to the strip tomorrow, but even there, I think I'd rather the explorer than the sub... for now.
It may not be "too small" but it's also not "just right" like the 39mm option was for alot of people. I'm totally for offering the classic 36mm for smaller sized wrists but why take the more popular 39mm choice away? How about offer both? Who's making these stupid decisions at Rolex.
Forgot to mention! 6.0" wrist!
Looks great. You shouldn’t be wearing anything bigger to be honest.
Yeah you have quite a slim wrist. That's perfect on you. I have one now on my still small but bigger 7.25" wrist and I'm not so sure, but it's the bracelet and clasp not the case that is my issue.
@@Swayndo I have 7,5 wrist and this 36mm Explorer is the one I wear.
My wrist is 6.25" I have DateJust 36. It's perfect size for my wrist.
@@Art_N_Science DJ36 is actually noticeably bigger than the explorer. Was browsing DJs with my wife to see which configuration would be best when the new dials role in.
Looks better on ur wrist than the sub, IMHO
I think you are right!! Why did I buy these other watches !?
I totally agree. The explorer looks like it fits your wrist perfectly and the submariner looks like it’s too big on your wrist
Thank you for the video and the review. Enjoying my 124270. It’s definitely not a large watch, but on a 6.5” wrist, I think it’s perfect. Take the superior movement with classic looks, stainless steel Rolex that has rock-solid value, and the versatility of wearing with anything from sport shorts to 3 piece suit I’m thrilled I was able to get one so quickly. Best of luck to the other readers that are also looking to own.
Congratulations man! It's a do EVERYTHING watch. Maybe not a "F U" watch but it's the kind of watch for a confident MAN.
Perfect fit! Looks like the size was made for you buddy. Enjoy!
Thank you!! I'm very lucky I think, I never thought I'd be this happy with a smaller watch.
It looks PERFECT on you! I wear the new 34mm OP on a 6inch wrist and love the smaller sizes in general.
I have definitely looked more closely at the OP line because of this piece, both for myself and as potential gifts.
Also considering a DJ36 over a very obvious DJ41.
You clearly have a very small wrist and the 36mm fits you perfectly, while that submariner looks way to big...just my thoughts.
Yeah I definitely am not in the market for a sea dweller!
Ultimately.. I think what matters most is that you feel something when you put on that watch each time.
Your experience 100% mirrors my own.
3 weeks ago, I went to a Rolex AD, and I really liked a 2-tone, 36 Datejust...
I stood there in the shop, wanting to walk out with it, but I struggled with 36, because, my other watches are all 40+.
It's a generational thing: older generations were used to the 36 as the standard, and our generation is used to 40+.
After nearly a month, this size now feels appropriate, and when I bring out my larger watches...they feel REALLY huge.
I still love them all, but I'll definitely say this 36 Datejust has recalibrated my own preferences and tolerances for moderately-sized watches, by historical standards.
Cheers.
Yeah its a big big mental barrier. The watches look fine but your head is saying ITS TINY!
I wear 34 OP and got got used to wearing smaller watches. It looks very classic and I’m still glad rolex still makes 34-36 case watches. The explorer looks great on you
Thank you! I tried a DJ36 today, the first time I considered the 36. It looked really good. Just don't know where it would fit if I'm already wearing the explorer 95% of the time.
@@aussieexpat when you dress up i guess or with lighter coloured outfits. Its still versatile
@@SoXFireBlade yeah agreed. But here in vegas that would likely be out on the strip, so "dress up" probably just means loud, so perhaps a Batgirl, Hulk or precious metal.
I love the look of the DJ... but is it cool enough for the strip over pieces I already have?
@@aussieexpat a dress up watch to me should something elegant and understated such a reverso or calitrava. What are you referring are bold pieces with statement. They luxury sports watch rather than dress. The dj fits the dressier if you are going to a fine dine restaurant or something a bit formal or maybe a meeting. The hulk and batgirl fits the cooler bolder category. But thats my opinion and you can wear them the way you want in the end.
I wear 45 mm panerai... Try the watch on, if it fits it fits.. who cares about mm,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I 100% agreed with your sentiment about the watch being something you could comfortably wear ALL day. I have similar wrist size (6.25"), and I've been eyeing several Rolex watches between 36 and 41mm. While the 41 certainly looks nice, there is something cool about the subtle and understated nature of the 36mm, at least for me. Maybe I'm not a fan of attracting a lot of attention, but I feel comfortable wearing a compact, quality piece that looks fitted on my wrist.
Absolutely. I mean, it's undeniably fun to be sporting something MAXed out and flashy from time to time, but maybe that's not the right balance of concerns for an every day watch. With the explorer being the only watch only available in a smaller size now, it gives us permission to enjoy a 36mm in a world for 40+ monsters.
In this video your 36mm Explorer looks perfect, and I'd say it's on the larger end of the size scale suitable for your wrist. _(Size scale = 1. case shape 2. thickness 3. lug curvature 4. lug length 5. lug width & taper plus the all important 6. end-to-end or lug tip to lug tip distance)_
*On my 7¼"/18.4 cm wrist, my 36mm OP 116000 looks and fits perfectly. The above half-dozen traits are what achieve this.*
I 100% agree. Everything bigger than this is oversize, including maybe even a DJ36 which I tried on the other day which wears bigger than the explorer in fluted bezel configuration.
This being said, I've not had any jarring experiences slapping the fat ones back on my wrist.
@Will Harris *What rules?*
I have the 39, but got the call from my AD on the 36 so now have both. I have a 6.75" wrist, so the upper ends of my comfort level is 38/40. I do find on the Explorer that I prefer the 39 vs the 36. My wife on the other hand loves 36's in general, so I bought her some colorful Barton Straps and now she wears the 36 Explorer. If I could customize an Explorer just for me, i would go with a 38 ; unfortunately the rolex world doesn't roll that way, so you pick the one that you think is best for you. If my wrist were slightly smaller, I would probably prefer the 36. If it were bigger I would probably prefer a massive Panerai :).
I've had mine now for a week and I love it. I don't think its too small and I have a 7 inch wrist. I love wearing this watch and it now makes my White Birch look huge...
Enjoy it in good health my man. Good to see these landing in people's wrists that will enjoy it.
I felt the same buying a 36mm black bay. I thought I needed at least a 39mm watch for my medium size wrist and my stout, slightly overweight frame. Now I gravitate towards that watch everyday. It sits neat and tidy on the wrist; Feels unobtrusive without coming off weightless and dainty. the Black bay 36/ explorer 36 have the same flavor in my opinion. Sporty yet sophisticated. Large and hefty enough to have perceivable presence without feeling chunky and bloated. I’d even make an argument for a retro sized submariner now that I’ve seen the light of a sub 39mm watch.
Cool man! I'll take a closer look next time I'm at the ad!
Getting mine tomorrow... Can't wait!
Congratulations!! Again like for me don't freak out if you feel it's small. Take some photos to help you "see".
Perfect size of watch for your wrist. I will look in Datejust 36 next, or maybe a Rolex Day-Date. Enjoy in good health.
I'm really enamored by the DJ36. I'd love to have an oyster with smooth bezel with one of the new 2021 dials.
My wrist is around 7.7 inches and I love the 36 mm. Enjoy the watch, I also wear 45 mm watches, but the 36 mm feels so nice.
it doesn't look small. Far from it.
Maybe on a +7in wrist it would look a bit disproportionate, maybe not
The Explorer is a better fit than the Sub on your wrist. I think you definitely made the right choice. Also I completely agree with you about the all day EDC. There is something about 36-37mm watches that makes them very comfortable. You can forget you are wearing them but at the same time they still look good and proportionate.
Yeah. Because I take the bigger watches off at home, basically only wearing them out, it kinda makes me feel like a poser. There's an authenticity to wearing a watch you actually wear all day even at home.
I really really want that Explorer, I think it would be the perfect fit for my rather small wrist!
6 inches wrist and complain about overall sizing? It’s perfect
39mm was perfect. They should have never changed it. Or at the very least offered both opinion. With that being said the 36mm fits you well.
It's going to be interesting to see if ANYTHING in the Rolex line up moves to the more intermediate 38mm range ever again. It seems like they are really stamping out 36 and 41 sizes.
That was a stupid thing for Rolex to do. Today the style is bigger watches. The Submariner they made 1mm bigger and making the Explorer 3mm smaller makes no sense. I like the 39mm better which was already smaller than the Submariner. It is now the size of a dress watch instead of a sports watch. I would rather get a Datejust 36mm or an Omega Seamaster Aquaterra 38mm version.
@@davidrichter3681 The overall market is actually slimming down a bit. Note the marked popularity of the bb58.
The new Sub despite being billed at 41mm is technically only .2mm bigger, but overall projects a more slender look than the outgoing super case 116610.
So the explorer returning to 36mm is another step towards a line up with more slender / classic looks.
I'm going to guess the GMT eventually adopts the less bulky looking proportions of the new Submariner eventually and the milgause retires or is completely redesigned.
@@davidrichter3681 Are you on crack? They went back to their original size. Most people don't have big foot size wrists. Why mutilate it and make it even bigger? Keep it original. It loses the sparkle when you make it too big, good god. If your wrist is too big, buy Invicta.
- Well, you were right. They didn’t come out with a 41mm Explorer . They came out with a 40mm 😆 . good video 👍
Ha yes. And its got almost the exact same proportions as the ex36 just bigger, hence 21mm lug width. So not an op case, another unique case and watch. I appreciate they didnt skimp out.
Not too small. It looks perfectly sized.. Nice buy. Congrats.
Thanks man!
looks great on your wrist. the 39mm would work too, probably, for 6 1/2" wrists and up. Not sure why Rolex doesn't offer the Explorer in a few sizes, since wrists come in different sizes.
I think my next video will be on that topic.
Because watches used to be a one size fits all thing and Rolex still applies this to many of their lines. Men big and small used to wear a 36mm.
I absolutely appreciated your take on MY watch lol the 39mm Explorer. I was lucky enough to have been called by my AD for the new Submariner around April of this year and I purchased while still being on the waitlist for the Explorer. As soon as they announced they would be discontinuing the Explorer I panicked and looked for a brand new, still fully stickered Explorer. I was lucky and I couldn't agree with all of your points in your video. From the moment I wake up sometimes I'll even sleep with it, the Explorer will be with me till I die LOL sorry for the long comment but wanted to share!
Totally agree. So wow man getting the sub and the explorer at the same time. I was about 3 months between and the explorer has certainly seen more wrist time. Have you found that yourself?
@@aussieexpat The Explorer is definitely getting much more wrist time and has become my favorite watch in my small collection. If I had to give up every watch but one I'd definitely be happy with keeping just the Explorer that's for sure. I’m curious to see if that's indeed the case when I acquire the new Speedmaster from Omega. I even wanting that watch for a while now.
@@slater1949 im after a speedy too but in no rush... likely to be bundled with a very hot rolex at the same time...
Isnt the speedy not waterproof?
I'm going to say it looks infinitely better on your wrist than the sub in this video. How you (the royal you) perceive the size of a watch on the wrist is massively effected simply by what you are used to...your "Norm". With patience your eye can adjust to any watch size and generally, if you give smaller watches a chance.....you may never go back!!! Thanks for the vid, great content!!
Thank you man! I'm trying to keep it up! What's interesting is going back and forth between big and small isn't jarring now either.
Looks good on for your wrist size, at 16 CM . I own the previous model 214270 @ 39mm and on my wrist it looks great, but then my wrists are 18,15! Enjoy wearing it!
I don't see any reason why someone would let go of a 214270. Great watch.
Excellent review and spot on. The weight and low profile nature of the Exp 1 made it a killer EDC / work wear watch. It is dramatically lower key than the Sub. You got that part right on! They make a killer combo.
That's definitely how it's playing out! I'm having to think about when the sub goes on the wrist because it's no longer my default!
I’m sporting close to an eight inch wrist and insist on a 36mm oyster perpetual. In my profession I often work in cramped quarters and the 36mm collects fewer dings.
Perfect on your wrist but too small for mine imo, I have a 7” flat wrist with a 60mm span.
How exactly do you measure the flat span of your wrist? I know I'm small, but since I do find 40mm watches fine, I'm wondering how flat is flat....
You seem to have a 'round' six inch wrist as opposed to a flat oval wrist so this watch looks just right from lug to lug on your wrist, whereas the submariner looks too long lug to lug, but you seem to wear the bracelet quite loose which apparently leads to more wear in the bracelet link pins? and one or other lug tends to hang out from the wrist when worn with a loose bracelet.
I recently acquired the new 2023 40mm Explorer which is actually about 38.5 mm in reality when measured from the crown to the other side and as I have a very flat oval wrist at 6.75 inches, it looks okay as I have been wearing a 42 X 12mm mm Tag F1 for the past eleven years, which now looks a little clumsy compared to the Explorer as diver bezelled watches do seem to sit on top of a wrist rather than more sunk in like an Explorer with its sloping lugs and polished conical bezel.
I have a 40mm GMT master 2, 41mm Royal Oak, 40mm Yacht Master, plus a few other 40+ mm watches including Tudor & Omega.
Picked this up last week as it was available in the cabinet at the AD, no list.
I Had the same reservations over the size, but wore it every day for a week and had the exact same change of opinion - even on my 7 1/4 wrist.
I can see myself reaching for this watch more often than the others in future. Great piece.
Enoy, wear it in good health! Yes, 40mm watches are a dime a dozen. But watches that are literally perfect in 36mm, well, this is it!
been collecting watches since the 80s.....up until the early 2000s the norm was 34-37mm for men regardless of wrist size, bigger sizes only became the norm in the last 15 years
I think we're seeing a reversal. With the popularity of the bb58, and now this, rolex (and tudor) are letting people choose and they are trending down!
I recently got the 36mm Explorer in two-tones and I did go through the things in my head exactly as you mentioned. Is it a ladies watch, too small and lacks the presence of the submariner and other watches I own such as Tudors and Omegas which are all above 38mm? I’m very skeptical I now keep it in its box. Not sure I’m going to be able to convince myself of its worth on my wrist like you did. Good job managing the dilemma yourself.
You have lovely watch their. Wear it!! The TT IS AWESOME!
Excellent piece. Regards.
I'm looking for one of these and they are hard to get. The aqua terra and the railmaster are good alternatives . I like that there is no date and no useless extras like a rotating bezel. It's a masculine sports watch but with todays trends can be worn with almost anything.
It's very hard to put another watch above this unless you want something "flashy". It's great for sport, dining, formal or informal occasion. And arguably better at each one of those than any other watch.
I'm still trying to find one, but everybody is sold out?
The Explorer 1 just look so utmost perfect on your wrist! Thanks for sharing your opinion in this video. However, Im wondering, is that any special condition (existing customers or must buy together with other watch) to buy Ex1 directly from AD?. Thanks in advance.
Its certainly varies from watch to watch. This one was one of the first in the country as best as I can tell, so perhaps my AD was super sweet to me because my wife told them its my Birthday. My prior watch from them was a Batman so... they really owed me nothing.
Who knows ultimately, I'm guessing its simply as hard as the current market premium implies..
So I'd say probably harder than a sub date to get without purchase history.
Remember, Sir Edmund Hillary, who was a large man, wore a 34mm. 34-36mm is the traditional Rolex size.
This thing I a gateway to those classic sizes.
yeah. Get tired of hearing 34-36 mm derided as a women's size.
@@randybrickson4290 they can say its a "women's size" all day long, but won't change the fact it looks phenomenal.
I have the 2021 No-Date sub and the 2021 Explorer and agree with your sentiment.
Hi! What is your wrist size? Thanks!
Big watches such as 40mm are a bit out of the trend. Rolex never makes mistakes
It doesn’t look small at all. Just nice and well-proportioned.
Seems like 36 is actually the perfect size for you! I have the same wrist size and I found that 34 is the smallest I can go and 36 is the sweet spot and most comfy. 38/39 is in the sportier look category and 41s for the stand out look.
Yes! I've definitely come to realize that. My AD immediately pushed for a DJ36 too :p
@@aussieexpat perfect dress watch to compliment that explorer 👌
on a 6 inch wrist its fine!
6" wrist is made for 36mm watches, and quite frankly appears to be perfectly suited on your wrist. I have a 7.5" wrist and while it looks small on my wrist, I kind of appreciate it.
I hope you have the same sentiments for when I wear my 40mm pieces and it "looks big" but I love 'em too 💗
I appreciate your video. Most other watch channel just talks about the watch spec. It's refreshing to hear others thoughts and experience with their timepiece. I own the Explorer but constantly feel like it is too small and end up wearing the GMT each time.. My wrist size is 7.25"
Thank you!! Yes i hope to bring a little more feeling because there is a lot of videos covering just specs. I'll never do a real review of anything, just the feel.
The explorer has become my number one watch as I feel a more elegant less in your face watch is what I want in most situations.
Take a few photos of the watch on your wrist and look at them. That's what struck me first, how it looked in photos was much more pleasing initially than with my eyes alone.
. I just purchased a 2004 114270. Love the watch! I even prefer the hollow center links and the charm of the old clasp. Just something about jingling and jangling that I like.
Enjoy it man! Congrats on pulling the trigger on one of the best ever!
@@aussieexpat thanks bud! Great video
It's my grail watch. I'm wearing a Tisell Explorer at 40mm as a placeholder until I can find and buy this Explorer from an AD in the UK. I've got a Rolex store opening very close by, so fingers are crossed!
In the meantime I can sort of compare the Tisell to my SARB035 (38mm) and my Dad's very old Seiko SQ (36mm). I prefer the smaller sized watches and I have a 7.25" wrist.
I think the smaller dial and case tell me "master craftsmen shoe-horned an automatic movement and these engineered hands and batons into this small space", whereas the bigger (especially the dinner-plate sized) watches can be built by any old fashion house building from a Chinese parts bin to lower tolerances. It might not be true, but that's the *feeling* I get.
There's a place for big, even 'statement' watches (I have some chunkier models already) but for one understated watch to last a lifetime, this one seems perfect to me.
Yes! It takes a certain maturity I think to l I've this. Certainly not the status seeker, but someone that wants quality!
I have no idea what the opportunities are like for store openings. A new boutique opened here a few months ago but I didn't bother trying as it's owned by my current ad and didn't want to piss off my SA.
For a small mens wrist or woman's wrist it looks great. For men with 7inch + wrist it's too small. 39mm was perfect for both small and large.
I would like a 41mm for real men.
I own a 114270, I absolutely love it. The new one, I've got my eye on it, I like it! 👍36mm 34mm is all I wear
First view of one of your videos and I must say I enjoyed it very much. You look like a natural so keep going
Thanks man! It's hard to keep it up with a full time job and toddler, but I'm enjoying it when I can make the time!
The Explorer should have stayed a 36mm watch. There was no reason to ever go 39mm, it was for fashion only.
Yeah it came out around the same time rolex was feeling self conscious and released the YM2 I think. Within a collection, there was always room in the sport line up to have a watch that wasn't big.
I agree that it looks better in 36mm, however I’m thankful that us bigger wristed fellas get the chance to wear the 39mm version. Even the 39mm there was a bit of an adjustment period to the smaller size then what I’m used to I’m very happy with the 39mm Explorer!
Edmund Hillary climbed the Everest with a 34 mm Rolex perpetual. Airking is a pilot watch originally 34 mm. Its a bold and brave move of Rolex going back to 36 mm as this is a true tool watch for mountaineers and people working with their hands. i got 2, the old and this new one because it just awsome
Thats awesome. A lot of love for explorer owning both the old AND new.
I like the old 36mm more with 20mm bracelet. The watch head looks too big for the small 19mm bracelet in the new version. Hard to tell the differences though unless you take a few seconds to look
looks freakin amazing - a one watch collection
Thanks man! It's been. Like that since I got it. Even got a Hulk a week ago and it hasn't come back out of the safe.
Looks great. For those of us who started with and loved 36-38mm watches, this watch is a welcome return to sensibility! I got over big watches after having a Portugueser and Panarai about 10-15 years ago. I’m hoping IWC will make a 39mm Pilot chronograph again, so I can replace the one I should never have sold! I’m hoping for a better selection of good new watches in the 38mm range. 36mm works amazingly good with Rolex Datejust and Explorer. Enjoy!
What have you done with those big watches now that your taste has changed?
And Day Dates
Looks perfectly proportioned on your wrist. Great buy, timeless
Damn I think the 39 might look to big on your wrist. Maybe just camera illusion? The 36 looks like the 39 on you so your good to go !!
I do have a smaller wrist. But when you get used to the same big watches everyone else does what looks good to your own eye starts getting murky.
True true. But it looks great on you ! Good buy and great video! Thanks.
@@jamesincharlotte Thank you! I'm trying to keep it up!
Thanks for your video! It looks great and definitely less blingy than the sub. Definitely highly recommended!
Looks perfect on your wrist. I can see it being small for people with bigger wrists.
thanks for sharing your experience. Does this latest model has lume on the arabic 3,6,9?
Sure does!
It is too small for the average man, you just happen to have small wrists. It doesn't look bad on you, in fact I think your Sub looks quite poor on you, since it's too big. I think the 36mm is your perfect size, for most people 39mm is the perfect size. That is due to average male wrist size being around 6.8-7 inches. Embrace it... you're lucky... all the 36mm watches are so much cheaper and affordable, since the style is now 39-41.
It really looks great on your wrist. I think it’s the perfect size!
Excellent review. I’m one day into my new 124270 and…..OMG
That watch is absolutely perfect for your wrist. Congrats!
To me, the size looks perfect on you. I have a small wrist, so this is appealing to me. The bigger watches like the submariner look ridiculous on me, but i guess it's subjective. Enjoyed the review.
Great take on an excellent watch! I have the 39mm and a 7.5" wrist! It's a great size, but the 36mm is just as good! They're both one and done watches!
Each to their own. I rock 34mm vintage tudors on a 7.25in wrist and it works great.
Hell yeah man. Class.
Looks good, but I tried one too and I thought it is too small in person.
After you said you was wearing it. I had to come here to see it 😂
Quality video & watch!
Thanks man, it's been a year and owe a follow up!
Wow you did well from AD? Congrats
Definitely NOT too small on your wrist. Looks perfect.
It looks perfect on your wrists, 36mm is the original and classic Explorer size. I immediately knew the 36mm was perfect for me and when I finally got mine a few days ago it was confirmed.
Congratulations!! Very lucky!
This Explorer looks great on your wrist, perfect size. Thank's for this video.
And hopefully more videos to come. Just a hobby for me but trying!
How do you feel now that the 40mm is out? I'm on the list for the 36 currently
To me 36 is OG. I wouldnt really consider the 4k unless it was going to be a one and only and i was simply a bigger guy. Im glad more people see it as an option.
Initially when they release 36 millimetre explorer I did not like it.. but after watching your videos it started growing on me we want to see a lot of videos on your explorer.
Thanks man! Another one coming on Sunday hopefully!
I think the lug to lug is almost identical to the sub, so it probably wears bigger than you would think a 36mm would lug to lug is as or more important than diameter on how a watch will look on the wrist.... You're lucky to find one at an AD
The lug to lug is not even close.
39 is the best size for every watch:))
I'm getting this tomorrow I'm getting my wife a 36 OP for Xmas.... hoping to get over the ladies sizing that's been hammered into my head.
Well the OP36 is a bigger watch actually!
@@aussieexpat change of plans maybe she's getting a 31 now ha
@Adam Ton the 31 is a fine choice. My wife also prefers that size, but she much preferred the double stick.
The sub looks massive. The Explorer looks just right.
The sub is at the extreme of a "normal" watch size.
Hi Aussie Expat, how about a long term review of your explorer? Would be interested to hear how it sits in your collection of other "grail" watches.
Getting there. 1 year is up on both my sub and hulk. Sorry, but life is thankfully busy, new baby on the way next month :)
@@aussieexpat congratulations! Maybe that would be another interesting video - why do so many of us get into watches around the time we start having children.
I'm so glad to see the Explorer come home to 36mm. 39mm should have never been a thing!
I'm not saying it was ugly.... but maybe... awkward. The owners of 39s will be comforted be soaring gray prices.
The 39mm Explorer I, was perfect for anyone who had average / bigger than average wrists. I have 8" wrists, and it looked perfectly in proportion. The 36mm would look comical on me.
I disagree. The 39mm was a perfect modern sports watch
@@mariog7213 There’s a reason why 39mm is no longer in the Rolex catalog.
AGREED, 36MM is ORIGNAL.
YOU ARE CORRECT. THEY JUST RELEASED THE NEW EXPLORER 40 RECENTLY.
If anything too big for your wrist IMO, but looks good.
Yeah I'm only 1 link shy of my wife's size!
It looks perfect on you. I too own the same Explorer and it’s perfect in every way.
Congrats on enjoying the explorer!
Great opinion. My view is 36mm would be more suitable for the ladies. Hope to see Rolex coming out with the 41mm Explorer with the steel, and also half gold version. You never know ...
I honestly wouldnt hold my breathe. Initially I thought the same, until I saw the case wasnt the same as the OP.
Buddy.. it fits perfectly
A 36 mm watch is a sweet spot for 6-6.5 wrists. I have an explorer TT model '23. The best looking watch with value and prestige. Accuracy -15 seconds per month. 👍
Incredible. I adore the gold 3 6 9 on the TT.
Mate, that watch looks HUGE on your wrist -- seriously! What on earth have you been wearing previously? Wow...smh. 🥺 -- PS - Its still rocks, tho!
6.2" inch wrist here. I've had the 124270 for 3 weeks and I can't get a comfortable fit no matter what I do with easylink or the microadjustment holes. Its annoying me so much. I need 1 more millimetre for the perfect fit in all weather and the 3mm clasp holes and 5mm easylink are just way too much. I've stopped wearing it because I'm not enjoying it anymore. Also 5mm is way too much for easylink. Try 2.5mm @Rolex. Please.
I wore the explorer loose for a year with an entire link too much and it was nice. I did remove a link recently and now it's a little more normal. But slightly loose is what I think this should be happenning for this piece. It's very light, so it doesn't need to hug the wrist. But agree. easylink is nice, but it needs to be less than 5mm. Some people will disagree by how small, I think 3mm, but a rolex glidelock is 2mm increments but I usually use 3 different settings on my sub. Implying perhaps 6mm of range is actually correct....
"EDC'able" a word the world never asked for and should never be used again
Everyone just loves initialisms huh? Elon Musk hates initialisms.
@@aussieexpat 🤑
My wrist is about 7.5“. I think for me it‘s be too small. But on your wrist it looks just perfect!
Actually I‘ve lately been to a Rolex dealer to try on the 124270. It was strangely small in the first place, but just perfect after a short while. I absolutely fell in love. Even with the metal/gold version! I was double surprised that day.
I’m wearing the Explorer 36mm daily on my 7.5 inch wrist. It’s just perfect
It has perfect proportions. It looks perfect on your wrist. It even extends out on one side.. We have been conditioned to wearing clown-sized watches. All my current watches are 38mm (plus outer dial) and above. In a few years they will look garish.
Just got a couple of 38mm watches, the bb58 and.... daytona 😜
Any bigger and it would be too big for you, like your Submariner is! Those overhanging lugs means it’s too big my friend.
I think it’s the perfect size and a classic Rolex that doesn’t shout look at me.
I've been enjoying this aspect so much. I felt very comfortable wearing this on a recent holiday to San Diego. Would not say the same about a flashier piece!
It's perfectly fit in your arm 👍🏻👍🏻
anything bigger than 36mm would be too big for you (just my opinion). This fits you perfectly! congrats!
Thank you!
Wow. Great video for my current watch hunt. I'm in the 41 Submariner now, down from the SD43 which became too heavy for every day wear for me. Bought a 41 datejust (rhodium dial, jubilee, smooth bezel), but just don't love it. It sits on my bedside and I wind it before bed every other day or so. My wrist is bigger than yours, but I do love the simplicity of the EXP 1. Hope to get one on my wrist soon to look at it and feel it. It's true the going from a larger watch to a smaller watch is alway disorienting for at least a day as your eye adjusts to the new diameter. Happy you love this one so much. I just got rid of a Pelagos LHD and I regret it. Seeing this 3 watch quiver of yours makes me miss it more. Do you wear that blue Pelagos as a beater/fun watch? I have a blue Triton Subphotique I bought just before I got into Rolexes--had always resisted them as too flash, but now it's hard to wear anything else!
The pelagos would logically be a beater in my collection but since I actually where the sub 41 more, with the pelagos blue being a "weekend" watch, the pelgos is pretty minty. But my wife says the pelagos suits me more.
Unless you've got strong emotional attachment to the sub, I'd say prepare for it to be replaced as an edc. I'll certainly post here if I stop wearing the explorer... but its just so much nicer to wear and honestly.. it looks better. The only place the sub wins is flash, which kinda means it's only a "going out watch". Which maybe is better to get a bluesy or root beer for such occasion...
@@aussieexpat nice! The Triton I have wears similarly. It’s not titanium though and I want that as an alternative to the Rolex from time to time. The Sub 41 is just about the perfect watch in wearability terms. But you make a strong argument for the Explorer I. I turn 50 this year so I’m also thinking of the new EXP II 50th anniversary. My wrist is 7.5 in so a bit bigger than yours. 41/42 mm sits just right on my wrist
@@AnselmClinard go for broke, 50 is a BIG deal. Blue SkyD on jubilee!
@@aussieexpat Now you’re talking! We should a conference call with my wife so you can convince her. :)
As others mentioned, the Explorer looks better on your wrist than the Sub does. Im not taking away from your Sub though as it looked great as well
I also think the same, my pelagos got some wrist time today for a little more casual flare but the sub... I don't know when I'd bring it out to be honest!
Going to the strip tomorrow, but even there, I think I'd rather the explorer than the sub... for now.
It may not be "too small" but it's also not "just right" like the 39mm option was for alot of people. I'm totally for offering the classic 36mm for smaller sized wrists but why take the more popular 39mm choice away? How about offer both? Who's making these stupid decisions at Rolex.
There are other watches that size, like the OP.
@@aussieexpat which is nowhere near as coveted or as handsome as the Rolex Explorer 1. The most versatile watch ever created.
@@steelsteez6118 How do you like the new Air King? I kind of get the feels that it fills this gap now. I actually really dig the new AK.