For a gentleman, less is always more. I'm a big lad (6'2" tall, 13stone, 71/4" wrist) and often wear 40/42/44mm watches (Sub/Speedy/Marinemaster), but the 36mm Explorer is the one. Classic. Perfect proportions. All you need. It does lean toward smart over very casual. I wear mine working in forestry, on the farm, in a suit to town, on the motorbike, on the bicycle, in the pool and out to dinner. Almost no watch has that versatility. The definitive GADA watch and one of the greats.
agreed, i wear mine everywhere. I have the two tone, which gives me that feeling that i love while not even seeing the gold in certain situations due to lighting.
I’m 6’4 with 7.5inch wrists and I love this watch. I don’t own one yet but I tried it on and it seemed small, as I don’t own a watch of this size, but it felt comfortable and easy to read. I’ve had large watches which I thought were too large but after some time, you get used to it. That photo with Sir David Attenborough wearing one looks small compared to his wrist size but it looks good. If my AD calls me I would jump at this watch.
Probably the most perfect overall watch in design, execution and size. Like you pointed out it’s under the radar but the wearer gets the full enjoyment of the experience of perfection… without everyone else needing to know. I do not own one, but love the watch from afar. Keep up the awesome content.
Today I registered my interest in a 36mm Explorer and/or 36mm Oyster Perpetual with two authorised dealerships in Edinburgh. I returned home, and quite by chance, came across your excellent CZcams presentation on the Explorer. I concur with everything you say about the Rolex. Great stuff!
Yes sir, this watch killed the desire for other watches. It's difficult to let this one go. I bought my new Explorer 36mm in October 2021. Since then I do not wear my other watches. Besides my Speedmaster (another one and done perfect one watch) I'm trying to get a rotation going. So I wear my Speedy one full week out of the month, and the rest is for my Explorer. You are so right about flying under the radar. No one notices the Explorer on wrist. That's one of it's strengths is discretion, the other is versatility. A Rolex that doesn't scream Rolex or look like a Rolex. I can wear it with a suit, business casual, jeans & t-shirts, camping gear, or wear it on a beach. The size it perfect for me, plus it's a classic size. I am a child of the 70's & 80's so smaller watches are nothing new to me. I feel that size should be functional. Like a chronograph or dive watch should be 40mm - 44mm for visibility/timing. A field or sport watch should be 36mm - 39mm for function/reference. A dress watch should be 35mm - 37mm for discretion/elegance.
The review I've been waiting for. I totally agree with your view on the Exp1. In my opinion the Explorer 1 is (more than the Submariner) the quintessential Rolex. Wear it in great health chap, cheers!
A gentleman cannot experience a more timeless and elegant piece. 'May you live in interesting times' (Tsun Tsu). I feel blessed to have seen the introduction of the 70 hour power reserve movement, and the reissue of the Explorer I! Both monumental feats. Just one more monumental feat to overcome, convincing my A.D.
I just bought my Rolex Explorer 124270 last Thursday and I'm in love. You nailed it with it being understated and perfect in size. I wear a suit everyday for work where I have been wearing my Rolex Submariner 116610LN which I love equally. There's something about the newer Explorer 1 that makes it so wonderful to own. It's so simple and tough. Great video. Keep up the great content. Subscribed.
Congrats ! I’m on the list too for the new Explorer 36mm as well as the new Submariner date. Let’s see which one comes through 🙏🏻. I currently have a steel Daytona a which I use everyday. If in my position, would you go for the Sub or the Explorer ?
@@rezar6894 That's awesome! The Rolex Daytona is a great watch. If you wanted something more on the flashy and noticeable side, go with the Submariner Date (note that the date function often does come in handy). Whereas if you wanted something more understated and under the radar, go with the Explorer. But, I will say if in your position, try for the Submariner Date (as it's more difficult to get and a hell of a piece of art). I was on the waiting list for 2-years before I got my Submariner Date where I was only on the waitlist for 3-months before they called letting me know that my Explorer was in. Also remember that the Submariner and Explorer each have extraordinary history's so whichever one you own, you will embrace and feel part of that history. Hope this helps.
5 years ago I bought a NOS 114270. All papers even stickers. Last year of sale 2011. It’s perfect. Bought it to replace my 25 year old black air king I passed to my nephew.
I love the Explorer, but sadly my wallet doesn’t stretch to one. Instead I have a Tudor BB36, which is also a 36mm watch, and is perhaps what could be classed as Tudor’s homage to the 36mm Explorer. It’s a lovely watch, and now that I’m used to the 36mm size, following years of wearing an Orient Mako XL diver, it wears beautifully.
Great review. Thank you. I own a 2020 Explorer 1 214270 and I absolutely love it. I have a 7.5" wrist and it works well for me, but I love the fact that they've gone back to the 36mm size. It's a classic size. As you mentioned, have a look at some old movie footage and you'll see even smaller watches on well-known stars of the day. Heck, I own a 1957 Rolex OP at 34mm and I wear it and love it. Thanks, again, for an informational review. For me, there's nothing like wearing an Explorer. No one will notice except you, and that's the point.
The stainless steel Rolex Explorer in 39mm is discrete, brilliant and perfeto por me 7 1/4” wrist! It’s my grail and I’m planning to buy it when I retire. Thank you Ash. Cheers!
Great video! Small correction: there is precious metal, as the markers and hands are made of white gold to avoid tarnishing. From this to their use of 904L steel, I appreciate the lengths to which Rolex has gone to create an extremely solid version of this classic design that will truly stand the test of time and become an heirloom worth passing on
A great review! Love the explanation regarding size. I’m 5’11” and hover around 17 stone and I regularly wear a 38mm Breitling Colt that does look ‘small’ by today’s standards (it was an engagement present in 2001) but it is so much more comfortable than the bigger watches I’ve bought since.
Excellent review, Ash! I love the 36mm Explorer. Rolex tells a yarn about Everest, however. Hillary was wearing a Smiths when he reached the summit, Norgay wore a Datejust. I've had no luck getting an Explorer from any AD, so I bought a Smiths PRS-25 Everest instead, and it is a crackin' good watch. Cheers!
Indeed but Rolex already secured the "Explorer" patent in 1953 and it's interesting to check out the July 1953 TV footage & photographs of the expedition team arriving in London... interesting reading: Tenzing's Two Wrist-Watches: The Conquest of Everest and Late Imperial Culture in Britain 1921-1953 (Oxford University Press) #MoonwatchUniverse 🧐
100% agree on your review. I'm loving the 36mm and it wears so well on my 6.25in wrist. Waited 3 months for it at the AD this year - however it's a shame that mine came with a dust on the dial and they had to take it back 2 weeks to remove it.
Ash, I got the call from my AD on Saturday that my 124270 had arrived and I have not taken it off my wrist since then! It has already become my favorite watch, so light and comfortable I can easily wear it loose and under the bone, which is my preferred way to wear a smaller watch. It also flies under the radar screen and does not attract the wrong kind of attention, so this will be my daily driver. I will keep my Starbucks and DJ41 for special occasions! Cheers :)
Amazing review, I couldn't agree more. About the seize, 36mm is the more classic men's seize for a watch. I myself wear an Oyster Perpetual in 34mm. No need for a big pretentious dinner plate of a wristwatch.
Greetings, Luca. I so appreciate your comments. I also am fortunate to own one of the last-manufactured Rolex 34mm Date. (Mine is steel with black dial). It is a wonderful watch, and it is a man's watch. I like the size because I love classic style. It is of course a personal thing, but I appreciate your comment. I think this new Explorer at something over 35mm and less than 36 is quite interesting.
@@jandilverson950 It's always great to see people genuinely enjoining Rolex watches 👍. The 34mm is pure understatement. Light, slender and superbly comfortable. And of course being an oyster case it tends to wear larger, feels more like a 36mm in my opinion.
Great narrative. Congratulations on the comprehensive review & the great Rolex collection. As you may have guessed, I am also a fellow Rolex collector. I own 7 pieces of all various models including 2 Submariners, Sea-Dweller, Oyster Perpetual 36mm, Explorer 39mm and Explorer II. Surprisingly my most recent purchase was a vintage 34mm Air-King. Initially I thought it a tad too small. However, once it's on my wrist it looks perfectly fine. Also the light weight and absence of unnecessary extra metal, makes the smaller size watch feel more comfortable and elegant. Although I still love my 39mm Explorer, the 34mm Air-King is exponentially more practical. I do however defend the 39mm Explorer and think it still deserves a place in the Rolex catalogue. As people with larger wrists, which is stereotypically someone who may be a stronger, more heavy set guy. Unless they want to buy pre-owned, they now have no option but the 41mm Oyster Perpetual. I have also seen more women gravitating towards wearing men's larger sized watches these days and the 39mm Explorer actually looks better on a woman's wrist. The contrast of a large watch on a feminine wrist just looks more envogue. I also think the discontinued ref 116034 36mm Oyster Perpetual with the sunburst blue 3-6-9 Explorer dial & fluted white gold bezel is a great alternative to the 36mm Explorer.
My mate and I recently celebrated a milestone with a Speedmaster. We're now thinking of getting an Explorer (because, you know...). This has been helpful.
I collected mine yesterday… 23 months to the day from putting my name down! Small but perfectly formed, it just disappears on the wrist. It was bought and will be worn as my daily GADA watch.
I really enjoyed your video! I've looked seriously at a Rolex for a few years now and decided to go for it. Not realizing what happened in the past couple years with pricing and availability. I extended my working career due to Covid and will be retiring in the next few months at the age of 66. It's kind of disappointing that my chances aren't great purchasing that "gold watch" at the end of the rainbow going into retirement. After listening to your video I'm more convinced that the 36 Explorer is the one for me... simple, just bold enough (for me anyway), as my purchases in life are for my enjoyment not the worlds. To add insult to injury... I live in Saskatchewan a province of Canada, and there are no Rolex dealers hear! So I would say that drops me to the bottom of the bottom of the list!!!!! LOL
Well, the Explorer is not the most popular of Rolex pieces - most chaps seek out the bolder models, so I believe that you have a far better chance of achieving an Explorer than most of the other Rolex main players. The road to success begins with the first step - visit your local AD and explain your situation - you may find a friendly sales agent, who will smile and help you out! Good luck on your quest sir!
Great review Ash. I was the same way - as soon as I saw it was back to the classic size with all the modern features I had to have it. What I have discovered after wearing it for 10 months now is I hardly want to wear any of my other watches. It truly does everything so well. It glides under a shirt cuff with ease and under a ski glove with zero drama. It is also very lightweight and doesn't clunk around on the wrist like the Submariner does. I will add that the Explorer is way more low key than the other models - my sub gets a lot of comments. Explorer gets none and flys under the radar!
I currently only have the steel Daytona and now thinking of either getting the new Explorer or the new Sub or Sub date. Would you recommend the Explorer over the Sub or would you say the latter is more iconic ? Cheers
@@rezar6894 Hello. That’s a tough one. Both the Sub and the Exp 1 are amazing. I wear the Sub in the summertime a lot as a sports watch. Looks fantastic. It is a big and heavy watch tho. The Explorer just disappears on wrist and is so low profile. Slides under shirt cuffs or work clothes so easy. The truth is you need both! If you can only get one then I would decide what you want it for and pick the most appropriate model. The Explorer 1 has a nice feature that it flys below the radar - Sub not so much. It screams ROLEX.
@@rezar6894 I just saw your discussion. First of all, congratulations to own a Daytona! When did you buy/get it? How did things develop? Did you go for the Explorer or the Submariner?
I own the 124273 two tone and love it. It’s unique for an Explorer and defines the first of the true two tones in the Explorer range. Both are superb. Great video Ash!
A great watch! I am happy for you, Ash. From my point of view, this smaller watch is more masculine, because you don't need to prove anything - which shows confidence.
Stumbled across your video comparing the DJ and explorer1. Then on to this and love your take on the watch. Subbed! And I agree for me this is the Rolex for me - one day!
I’m a big man and I love the Explorer 1. I own larger watches myself too but the Explorer is my default watch. I don’t always want to wear large watches and I find they don’t always work with a suit jacket and cuff. I’ve never felt that it’s small size looks out of place on my wrist either. I didn’t care too much for the 39mm when I tried it on. To me, the 36mm is perfect, how it should be. After all, like you say, it was good enough for David Attenborough and Ian Fleming (the original Bond watch ! ).
I've had mine for a few days and I'm already thinking that the rest of my collection is going to stay in its box for the forseeable future. It's a keeper. Rolex is being cheeky about the Explorer's history, though. Sir Edmund wore a Smiths during the ascent, Sherpa Tensing wore a Rolex.
I received my ostentatious, flamboyant "two-tone" a couple of months ago. Fits my body size just right and is very easy to read with its uncomplicated dial. Just hope I don't get mugged! LOL
Thank you for the review. I'm on a weighing list for an Explorer in Manhattan, NY. I have had an Air-King for over 20 years and just picked up a Tudor Black Bay 58. For me, it's all about the bracelet. The longer you have it, the better it gets.
1 year on the wrist for me - no-one has noticed it except the one (!) watch aficionado who owns a Datejust. "Cool watch!", which means it's practically invisible. I work in close proximity to colleagues (who say nothing), and I know it is the only Rolex in the room - no-one notices! Safe to travel with on public transport (so-far. Touch wood!). A private gem. Very cool.
It's all about wrist size. I'm also 5'9. You didn't say you're wrist size but mine are 6.5 inches, 50cm wide so I keep coming back to 36mm. I sold my GMT Black ceramic to fund much of my current collection. Best decision I ever made. My current collection is 3 piece and it's my sweet spot. In fact I could happily go down to one but I want to hand these to my 2 kids when they're adults and still have one for myself.
In all of the content I've watched and read about the Explorer (which is a frankly embarrassing amount), no one has ever pointed out that it's a field watch. But of course it is! It's ridiculous that I didn't see that, but it's so obvious! People always talk about how you can dress it up or down, and that it's a proper tool watch (especially being a simple 3 hander), but no one's ever asked what category it goes into. Which is weird, because people seem to be obsessed with categorising every other watch. Excellent as always Ash. Cheers!
Great watch! being used to wearing vintage sport watches, I find the 39 mm version actually quite wearable. The 39 mm with its wider bracelet feels more tool watch than the smaller version and the smaller tapered bracelet, but that's really down to personal preference. I've owned mine for about 4 years now, and the explorer is fantastic regardless of size because of its simplicity, fairly thin case, and great robustness. Put it on your wrist and forget about it until needed! thanks for the video!
fantastic review. thanks for putting the time in to make this video. just picked mine up a week ago and i agree with you on all points you made. i have a feeling that a lot of my collection will now get some much needed rest for the foreseeable future. it truly is a watch that can do it all.
@@TheChapsGuide Hi! Congratulations to your purchase! Also you did a good video, thanks for that! But may I point out that there is always a tiny little precious metal hidden on the surface of any Rolex. The hands as well as the hour markers are made of white gold to prevent of getting cloudy like steel seemingly can. Enjoy your watch on good health!
I always loved the 1016, but having a generous 8” wrist I simply found it too small. I was therefore thrilled when Rolex came out with the 39mm version which I own and love. In fact since purchasing my Explorer 18 months ago I hardly ever wear my 5 digit Sub or SD and more. 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
Great review! I’ve got the exact same watch, I have it since August last year, also managed to get it from an AD and I’ve been wearing it every day since! I think it will never let me down.
Excellent review. You are a very talented presenter and public speaker. Engaging and entertaining. Thank you for sharing your experience. Wear that beautiful watch in good health! Cheers!
It’s the one watch. So many collectors with a plethora of fanciful watches, still fall in love with the Rolex Explorer 1. Interestingly, everyone has common AND differing reasons for it too.
I am a watch nut and subsequently have watched hundreds if not thousands of watch videos. That sir is the best watch review I have ever seen. Have yourself a subscription! Keep up the good work.
Extraordinary review! Thanks for the little known factoid about Ian Fleming . I was only one years old in 1953 but the Rolex Explorer 1 is the watch I would have had if I had been of age :)
Great watch and review. I got mine last year. Really enjoy the simplicity of the watch but bought it essentially because of the history and the heritage. I usually prefer to wear my OP 36 on a daily basis.
Already in 1953 Rolex secured the "Explorer" patent and since then the Explorer has been the favorite wrist watch of British author Ian Fleming, watchmaker Roger W Smith and zoologist Sir David Attenborough ... Subtle functionality and true elegant style !
The 1950s heralded the birth of the toolwatch, interesting socio-cultural background reading: Tenzing's Two Wrist-Watches: The Conquest of Everest and Late Imperial Culture in Britain 1921-1953 (Oxford University Press - by Gordon T. Stewart) 🧐
Really enjoyed the video. My dad has a vintage omega Seamaster which was a long service present from British Steel. It is 36mm and still works even though he hadn't used it for years. You are right. Often less is more. What is the watch dealer community like in South Wales? I.e, how is their customer service?
Calling my AD today to put my name down on the list!! love it! Also anybody dogging on this watch for the size is DUMB!! 36mm was the standard male size for a long time.
I always lusted for an explorer, and waited for a good offer to buy the old 36mm. So when the new one was announced, I went to an AD the day after and asked to put me on the waiting list. I had no prior relationship to that AD, since I just recently transited from a broke medstudent to MD. But, luckily I guess, I got the call Dec/2021. Cheeres!
Great vid, I can tell you really enjoy it, wear it in health. Interesting point regarding the negative space on the 214270 which I have and adore, it's one of my favorite points of the watch as I think it magnifies the field watch exsperience for me and adds far more than the negative space takes away.
My watch wrist is just over 7 1/2" and most of my dress watches are 36mm, I feel they look just about right (in fact my goto dress watch, an Omega Seamaster 471 is only 32mm). I never did like a dinner plate on my wrist. The Explorer 36mm is pretty much my grail watch, it's one of two luxury watches I intend to own, the Explorer and the Tag Heuer Monaco.
I enjoy your videos you give a honest and detailed review .I recently got my Rolex explorer I followed your advice and received my explorer whin a year I’m very happy with my watch .I would like to thank you for your advice please keep up good work. Thanks Allan
Great review. I’m a HUGE fan of the new 36mm Explorer. It’s top of my list, tied with the new 41mm Submariner. Depending on wait, I’m still not sure which one I want to buy first.
The watch looks splendid on you! I'm noticing more and more classy and confident men wearing watches in the 36-39mm size. That is why the Black Bay 58 in the 39mm size is so popular (shrunk from 41mm)... Bravo on your amazing Explorer! Totally agree that it fits in every situation and will last a lifetime. This was a great review - thank you!
Thoroughly enjoyed this synopus, of the "Explorer." Simply put, this is a watch for the man, who has nothing to prove, to anyone. Rolex as a brand, rarely looks backward, on any choice they make. For them to return to the original case dimension, speaks volumes about the relativity of the 36mm size, in relation to the cohesion, of the overall design. Everyone makes note, of how "timeless," the "Submariner" design is, and to a certain degree, I would tend to agree. However IMHO, I believe the design, of this generation of the "Explorer," to be arguably more so. My hats off to you, Sir. Cheers....
Brilliant video, I have been waiting 8 months for this watch it’s perfect for me, I’m not a small chap I think the size is purely preference I have vintage 40s omegas 33mm and 35mm and Tudor bb58 but also like 42mm they are all watches and all beautiful 👍
I’ve been trying to work the Everest thing out, and I agree that it sounds mostly like pure marketing. Although, I understand that they were creating prototypes of the Oyster Perpetual specifically for the Everest expeditions. It is possible that the watch Sir Edmund Hillary wore was in a technical sense, less a traditional Oyster Perpetual, and more an Explorer but without the label having been applied yet. I have read that they were technically modified for the expedition, but I have no idea if the Explorer actually contains those modifications, or even if those modifications continued in the Oyster Perpetual.
I'll buy the 36mm instead of 40mm cause I want my single daughter to wear it for looong years after me in comfort, she loves watches, 36 is the size to go with...
Ash. Another great review. Of all the Rolex the Explorer is my favorite. I like the early submariner but not a fan of the Cyclops window. Although I would never be able to afford such a watch. I really like the Simplicity of the Explorer and the smaller size. I agree with you and that the watches have gotten bigger just because of fashion. I remember in the 70s big watches were considered for old people so they could read the dial better. I have my father's Bulova from the 50s and it is a 34 mm automatic self-winding watch with a Swiss Movement. I wear this on occasions and believe it or not get more compliments on it than other watches I own. Bigger isn't always better. Cheers Ron
This was an excellent review. I saw an exhibition model today for the first time at my AD. I absolutely loved it. By far this is now at the top of my list. Hopefully the AD can come through for me.
Enjoyed the review and glad that yours arrived: you’ve had some nice pieces enter your collection while you’ve been waiting. Agree with the review. It is a timeless demonstration of quality, style, and yes, I say value. For something that is of this quality, gains in value, and can/should be worn daily I think it’s a fair price if you’re able to get one. The history is nice but the pedigree is hard to argue with. Also passed on a larger Rolex because the proportion was not right for me: and I didn’t want to settle for what was available preferring to wait for the one that was right.
My name is Ash (sitting next to a fire!) I got my 36mm last year and bought it with a Speedy (at a discount!!!) well pleased with both, I'm just waiting for the Casio-Rolex collaboration next week...!!!!
Nice review Ash. I loved reading the comments, it shows how we all differ in our tastes. I own the 39mm 214270, which works well on a 7,5” wrist. When trying on the new 36mm my wife asked is that a lady’s version? It doesn’t matter what we buy, as long as we enjoy the experience, which is evident in your case. Health to wearing it.
I was very tempted to buy an Everest - it’s a lovely watch with an interesting back story, and I think a viable alternative to the Rolex for those on a budget.
@@simonhodgetts6530 It's a good-looking homage wrist watch as today's Smiths has nothing to do with the mid 20th century Smiths watch manufacturer (1946-1980 Cheltenham - UK).
Great review as always Ash. I enjoyed the little bit of comedy infusion. “I like discretion” you’ve got a root beer and a Pepsi. 🤣🤣🤣. I agree with your comments on watch size. I have larger wrists and can pull off a 44mm panerai but also am happy with a 36mm too. If you love the watch or have a sentimental connection you should wear it no matter the dial dimensions.
I've been waiting for this review for a while now.....Thank You Ash!..... I've been waitlisted for the Explorer since the 1st week of January....I was offered the 2 tone variant in Feb....I passed on it.....I own a Bluesy and really didn't want another gold piece, especially considering how little I wear mine.... I want something under the radar for work....... I've been eyeballing the Tudor BB36 in the silver dial.
I have been waiting for someone to quote the actual diameter. Rolex are very flexible with their sizes. The older versions like the 114270 are also 35mm and not the stated 36nm.
Lovely lovely video - my exact thoughts - its the best original Rolex - i got the 36mm ( for the Mrs ) - i am now hunting a pre owned 39mm. The only thing i found was the bracelet was a bit tiny as i am used to the sub and my gmt.
I think the black dial makes it look a bit smaller than say a datejust of the same size but with a silver/champagne dial. That said, I love the originality of the smaller 36mm size.
just went for a boutique on mine, was available. I bought it. no i'm a joking. i had to wait 12 months. That's my second explorer, and people did follow me in the street to steal it
Fully agree you have to try it on, I did and it felt small on my 7 inch wrist. It would not be my first choice but if I can get it from the AD I would make it part of my collection. Cheers!!
For a gentleman, less is always more. I'm a big lad (6'2" tall, 13stone, 71/4" wrist) and often wear 40/42/44mm watches (Sub/Speedy/Marinemaster), but the 36mm Explorer is the one. Classic. Perfect proportions. All you need. It does lean toward smart over very casual. I wear mine working in forestry, on the farm, in a suit to town, on the motorbike, on the bicycle, in the pool and out to dinner. Almost no watch has that versatility. The definitive GADA watch and one of the greats.
agreed, i wear mine everywhere. I have the two tone, which gives me that feeling that i love while not even seeing the gold in certain situations due to lighting.
I’m 6’4 with 7.5inch wrists and I love this watch. I don’t own one yet but I tried it on and it seemed small, as I don’t own a watch of this size, but it felt comfortable and easy to read. I’ve had large watches which I thought were too large but after some time, you get used to it. That photo with Sir David Attenborough wearing one looks small compared to his wrist size but it looks good. If my AD calls me I would jump at this watch.
Probably the most perfect overall watch in design, execution and size. Like you pointed out it’s under the radar but the wearer gets the full enjoyment of the experience of perfection… without everyone else needing to know. I do not own one, but love the watch from afar. Keep up the awesome content.
Today I registered my interest in a 36mm Explorer and/or 36mm Oyster Perpetual with two authorised dealerships in Edinburgh. I returned home, and quite by chance, came across your excellent CZcams presentation on the Explorer. I concur with everything you say about the Rolex. Great stuff!
From what I know, if you register your interest for the same model at more than one AD, they will cancel your registration of interest.
Yes sir, this watch killed the desire for other watches. It's difficult to let this one go. I bought my new Explorer 36mm in October 2021. Since then I do not wear my other watches. Besides my Speedmaster (another one and done perfect one watch) I'm trying to get a rotation going. So I wear my Speedy one full week out of the month, and the rest is for my Explorer. You are so right about flying under the radar. No one notices the Explorer on wrist. That's one of it's strengths is discretion, the other is versatility. A Rolex that doesn't scream Rolex or look like a Rolex. I can wear it with a suit, business casual, jeans & t-shirts, camping gear, or wear it on a beach. The size it perfect for me, plus it's a classic size. I am a child of the 70's & 80's so smaller watches are nothing new to me. I feel that size should be functional. Like a chronograph or dive watch should be 40mm - 44mm for visibility/timing. A field or sport watch should be 36mm - 39mm for function/reference. A dress watch should be 35mm - 37mm for discretion/elegance.
One Speedy Pro and one Rolex Explorer…(and some straps) You really don’t need any more watches!
Great choice!
The review I've been waiting for. I totally agree with your view on the Exp1. In my opinion the Explorer 1 is (more than the Submariner) the quintessential Rolex. Wear it in great health chap, cheers!
Glad that you enjoyed my thoughts on this watch. I'm wearing it right now - hard to take it off!
Yes it certainly is. It is also the Rolex of choice for being discrete.
The perfect watch but I would prefer the 36mm Datejust with the blue dial and smooth bezel.
@@scooterbob4432 I have the blue dial with fluted bezel and jubilee. Love it too! Just a lot more dressy than the Exp 1.
@@BLR653 Wow that's a beauty. Enjoy it. My dream Datejust is still a dream.
The older I get, the more I'm becoming a miser.
A gentleman cannot experience a more timeless and elegant piece. 'May you live in interesting times' (Tsun Tsu). I feel blessed to have seen the introduction of the 70 hour power reserve movement, and the reissue of the Explorer I! Both monumental feats. Just one more monumental feat to overcome, convincing my A.D.
I just bought my Rolex Explorer 124270 last Thursday and I'm in love. You nailed it with it being understated and perfect in size. I wear a suit everyday for work where I have been wearing my Rolex Submariner 116610LN which I love equally. There's something about the newer Explorer 1 that makes it so wonderful to own. It's so simple and tough. Great video. Keep up the great content. Subscribed.
Congrats ! I’m on the list too for the new Explorer 36mm as well as the new Submariner date. Let’s see which one comes through 🙏🏻. I currently have a steel Daytona a which I use everyday. If in my position, would you go for the Sub or the Explorer ?
@@rezar6894 That's awesome! The Rolex Daytona is a great watch. If you wanted something more on the flashy and noticeable side, go with the Submariner Date (note that the date function often does come in handy). Whereas if you wanted something more understated and under the radar, go with the Explorer. But, I will say if in your position, try for the Submariner Date (as it's more difficult to get and a hell of a piece of art). I was on the waiting list for 2-years before I got my Submariner Date where I was only on the waitlist for 3-months before they called letting me know that my Explorer was in. Also remember that the Submariner and Explorer each have extraordinary history's so whichever one you own, you will embrace and feel part of that history. Hope this helps.
The first watch I fell in love with.
5 years ago I bought a NOS 114270. All papers even stickers. Last year of sale 2011. It’s perfect. Bought it to replace my 25 year old black air king I passed to my nephew.
Completely agree. Perfect understated everyday watch for modest wrist sizes…for everyone else get a 39mm and stop complaining.
I love the Explorer, but sadly my wallet doesn’t stretch to one. Instead I have a Tudor BB36, which is also a 36mm watch, and is perhaps what could be classed as Tudor’s homage to the 36mm Explorer. It’s a lovely watch, and now that I’m used to the 36mm size, following years of wearing an Orient Mako XL diver, it wears beautifully.
Great review. Thank you. I own a 2020 Explorer 1 214270 and I absolutely love it. I have a 7.5" wrist and it works well for me, but I love the fact that they've gone back to the 36mm size. It's a classic size.
As you mentioned, have a look at some old movie footage and you'll see even smaller watches on well-known stars of the day. Heck, I own a 1957 Rolex OP at 34mm and I wear it and love it. Thanks, again, for an informational review. For me, there's nothing like wearing an Explorer. No one will notice except you, and that's the point.
The stainless steel Rolex Explorer in 39mm is discrete, brilliant and perfeto por me 7 1/4” wrist! It’s my grail and I’m planning to buy it when I retire. Thank you Ash. Cheers!
I love my Explorer, bought it 2 weeks before the price increase. Lovely watch!
Great video! Small correction: there is precious metal, as the markers and hands are made of white gold to avoid tarnishing. From this to their use of 904L steel, I appreciate the lengths to which Rolex has gone to create an extremely solid version of this classic design that will truly stand the test of time and become an heirloom worth passing on
A great review!
Love the explanation regarding size. I’m 5’11” and hover around 17 stone and I regularly wear a 38mm Breitling Colt that does look ‘small’ by today’s standards (it was an engagement present in 2001) but it is so much more comfortable than the bigger watches I’ve bought since.
Excellent review, Ash! I love the 36mm Explorer. Rolex tells a yarn about Everest, however. Hillary was wearing a Smiths when he reached the summit, Norgay wore a Datejust. I've had no luck getting an Explorer from any AD, so I bought a Smiths PRS-25 Everest instead, and it is a crackin' good watch. Cheers!
Indeed but Rolex already secured the "Explorer" patent in 1953 and it's interesting to check out the July 1953 TV footage & photographs of the expedition team arriving in London... interesting reading: Tenzing's Two Wrist-Watches: The Conquest of Everest and Late Imperial Culture in Britain 1921-1953 (Oxford University Press) #MoonwatchUniverse 🧐
100% agree on your review. I'm loving the 36mm and it wears so well on my 6.25in wrist. Waited 3 months for it at the AD this year - however it's a shame that mine came with a dust on the dial and they had to take it back 2 weeks to remove it.
That's shocking to hear for Rolex standards. You mean you noticed dust between the dial and the sapphire?
@@ravipro Yup after 1 week wearing it and realized under light. Same for my OP39. Dust issues as well, so I reckon it's common.
Ash, I got the call from my AD on Saturday that my 124270 had arrived and I have not taken it off my wrist since then! It has already become my favorite watch, so light and comfortable I can easily wear it loose and under the bone, which is my preferred way to wear a smaller watch. It also flies under the radar screen and does not attract the wrong kind of attention, so this will be my daily driver. I will keep my Starbucks and DJ41 for special occasions! Cheers :)
Great choice and welcome to the Explorer club!
Amazing review, I couldn't agree more. About the seize, 36mm is the more classic men's seize for a watch. I myself wear an Oyster Perpetual in 34mm. No need for a big pretentious dinner plate of a wristwatch.
Greetings, Luca. I so appreciate your comments. I also am fortunate to own one of the last-manufactured Rolex 34mm Date. (Mine is steel with black dial). It is a wonderful watch, and it is a man's watch. I like the size because I love classic style. It is of course a personal thing, but I appreciate your comment. I think this new Explorer at something over 35mm and less than 36 is quite interesting.
@@jandilverson950 It's always great to see people genuinely enjoining Rolex watches 👍. The 34mm is pure understatement. Light, slender and superbly comfortable. And of course being an oyster case it tends to wear larger, feels more like a 36mm in my opinion.
Great narrative. Congratulations on the comprehensive review & the great Rolex collection. As you may have guessed, I am also a fellow Rolex collector. I own 7 pieces of all various models including 2 Submariners, Sea-Dweller, Oyster Perpetual 36mm, Explorer 39mm and Explorer II. Surprisingly my most recent purchase was a vintage 34mm Air-King. Initially I thought it a tad too small. However, once it's on my wrist it looks perfectly fine. Also the light weight and absence of unnecessary extra metal, makes the smaller size watch feel more comfortable and elegant. Although I still love my 39mm Explorer, the 34mm Air-King is exponentially more practical.
I do however defend the 39mm Explorer and think it still deserves a place in the Rolex catalogue. As people with larger wrists, which is stereotypically someone who may be a stronger, more heavy set guy. Unless they want to buy pre-owned, they now have no option but the 41mm Oyster Perpetual. I have also seen more women gravitating towards wearing men's larger sized watches these days and the 39mm Explorer actually looks better on a woman's wrist. The contrast of a large watch on a feminine wrist just looks more envogue.
I also think the discontinued ref 116034 36mm Oyster Perpetual with the sunburst blue 3-6-9 Explorer dial & fluted white gold bezel is a great alternative to the 36mm Explorer.
My mate and I recently celebrated a milestone with a Speedmaster. We're now thinking of getting an Explorer (because, you know...). This has been helpful.
One quick comment. I love the watch. It does have white gold hands, so a tiny and discreet amount of precious metal
I have this watch and 36mm is a great size for it. Definitely flies under the radar. In my opinion, it's the best time only watch on the market.
I collected mine yesterday… 23 months to the day from putting my name down! Small but perfectly formed, it just disappears on the wrist. It was bought and will be worn as my daily GADA watch.
Congratulations
I really enjoyed your video!
I've looked seriously at a Rolex for a few years now and decided to go for it. Not realizing what happened in the past couple years with pricing and availability.
I extended my working career due to Covid and will be retiring in the next few months at the age of 66. It's kind of disappointing that my chances aren't great purchasing that "gold watch" at the end of the rainbow going into retirement.
After listening to your video I'm more convinced that the 36 Explorer is the one for me... simple, just bold enough (for me anyway), as my purchases in life are for my enjoyment not the worlds.
To add insult to injury... I live in Saskatchewan a province of Canada, and there are no Rolex dealers hear!
So I would say that drops me to the bottom of the bottom of the list!!!!! LOL
Well, the Explorer is not the most popular of Rolex pieces - most chaps seek out the bolder models, so I believe that you have a far better chance of achieving an Explorer than most of the other Rolex main players. The road to success begins with the first step - visit your local AD and explain your situation - you may find a friendly sales agent, who will smile and help you out! Good luck on your quest sir!
Great review Ash. I was the same way - as soon as I saw it was back to the classic size with all the modern features I had to have it. What I have discovered after wearing it for 10 months now is I hardly want to wear any of my other watches. It truly does everything so well. It glides under a shirt cuff with ease and under a ski glove with zero drama. It is also very lightweight and doesn't clunk around on the wrist like the Submariner does. I will add that the Explorer is way more low key than the other models - my sub gets a lot of comments. Explorer gets none and flys under the radar!
I currently only have the steel Daytona and now thinking of either getting the new Explorer or the new Sub or Sub date. Would you recommend the Explorer over the Sub or would you say the latter is more iconic ? Cheers
@@rezar6894 Hello. That’s a tough one. Both the Sub and the Exp 1 are amazing. I wear the Sub in the summertime a lot as a sports watch. Looks fantastic. It is a big and heavy watch tho. The Explorer just disappears on wrist and is so low profile. Slides under shirt cuffs or work clothes so easy. The truth is you need both! If you can only get one then I would decide what you want it for and pick the most appropriate model. The Explorer 1 has a nice feature that it flys below the radar - Sub not so much. It screams ROLEX.
@@BLR653 many thanks. I guess I need to see if I get the call for any of the and just take whichever is offered first. Thanks for the help 👍🏻
@@rezar6894 I just saw your discussion. First of all, congratulations to own a Daytona! When did you buy/get it?
How did things develop? Did you go for the Explorer or the Submariner?
I own the 124273 two tone and love it. It’s unique for an Explorer and defines the first of the true two tones in the Explorer range. Both are superb. Great video Ash!
Nice to see another owner of the two tone Explorer 124273, which I also think is something really quite special.
I have it as well and Love it. I wear it everyday, in the bay, on the boat, at work and with a suit.. its perfection all around. Enjoy!
I’ve got a 124273 as well. It is the perfect watch for me.
A great watch! I am happy for you, Ash. From my point of view, this smaller watch is more masculine, because you don't need to prove anything - which shows confidence.
Stumbled across your video comparing the DJ and explorer1. Then on to this and love your take on the watch. Subbed! And I agree for me this is the Rolex for me - one day!
Welcome aboard!
I’m a big man and I love the Explorer 1. I own larger watches myself too but the Explorer is my default watch. I don’t always want to wear large watches and I find they don’t always work with a suit jacket and cuff. I’ve never felt that it’s small size looks out of place on my wrist either. I didn’t care too much for the 39mm when I tried it on. To me, the 36mm is perfect, how it should be. After all, like you say, it was good enough for David Attenborough and Ian Fleming (the original Bond watch ! ).
Here, here sir.
I've had mine for a few days and I'm already thinking that the rest of my collection is going to stay in its box for the forseeable future. It's a keeper. Rolex is being cheeky about the Explorer's history, though. Sir Edmund wore a Smiths during the ascent, Sherpa Tensing wore a Rolex.
I received my ostentatious, flamboyant "two-tone" a couple of months ago.
Fits my body size just right and is very easy to read with its uncomplicated dial. Just hope I don't get mugged! LOL
"It always seems the right watch to wear". Perfect description!
I have the 36 explorer. Love it. Perfect size.
Thank you for the review. I'm on a weighing list for an Explorer in Manhattan, NY. I have had an Air-King for over 20 years and just picked up a Tudor Black Bay 58. For me, it's all about the bracelet. The longer you have it, the better it gets.
Amazing Ash. my 3 watch collection: Exp1 124270, the first Tudor BB58, Tank Must 👍
1 year on the wrist for me - no-one has noticed it except the one (!) watch aficionado who owns a Datejust. "Cool watch!", which means it's practically invisible. I work in close proximity to colleagues (who say nothing), and I know it is the only Rolex in the room - no-one notices! Safe to travel with on public transport (so-far. Touch wood!). A private gem. Very cool.
Great One if I had to choose one. It would be the Explorer.
It's all about wrist size. I'm also 5'9. You didn't say you're wrist size but mine are 6.5 inches, 50cm wide so I keep coming back to 36mm. I sold my GMT Black ceramic to fund much of my current collection. Best decision I ever made. My current collection is 3 piece and it's my sweet spot. In fact I could happily go down to one but I want to hand these to my 2 kids when they're adults and still have one for myself.
In all of the content I've watched and read about the Explorer (which is a frankly embarrassing amount), no one has ever pointed out that it's a field watch. But of course it is! It's ridiculous that I didn't see that, but it's so obvious! People always talk about how you can dress it up or down, and that it's a proper tool watch (especially being a simple 3 hander), but no one's ever asked what category it goes into. Which is weird, because people seem to be obsessed with categorising every other watch. Excellent as always Ash. Cheers!
I love my explorer to for almost all the reasons you said. i have the two tone gold it not as loud as it looks i find that the gold is quite subtle
Great video, this popped up on my feed and made me remember watching it before I got my call.
Great watch! being used to wearing vintage sport watches, I find the 39 mm version actually quite wearable. The 39 mm with its wider bracelet feels more tool watch than the smaller version and the smaller tapered bracelet, but that's really down to personal preference. I've owned mine for about 4 years now, and the explorer is fantastic regardless of size because of its simplicity, fairly thin case, and great robustness. Put it on your wrist and forget about it until needed! thanks for the video!
fantastic review. thanks for putting the time in to make this video. just picked mine up a week ago and i agree with you on all points you made. i have a feeling that a lot of my collection will now get some much needed rest for the foreseeable future. it truly is a watch that can do it all.
Enjoy it
@@TheChapsGuide Hi! Congratulations to your purchase! Also you did a good video, thanks for that! But may I point out that there is always a tiny little precious metal hidden on the surface of any Rolex. The hands as well as the hour markers are made of white gold to prevent of getting cloudy like steel seemingly can. Enjoy your watch on good health!
I always loved the 1016, but having a generous 8” wrist I simply found it too small.
I was therefore thrilled when Rolex came out with the 39mm version which I own and love.
In fact since purchasing my Explorer 18 months ago I hardly ever wear my 5 digit Sub or SD and more. 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
Great review! I’ve got the exact same watch, I have it since August last year, also managed to get it from an AD and I’ve been wearing it every day since! I think it will never let me down.
What a admirable execution of an opinion on this Rolex model. Outstanding!
Thank you sir.
Looked at one today went from 40mm to the 36mm and got my name down for one.
Excellent review. You are a very talented presenter and public speaker. Engaging and entertaining. Thank you for sharing your experience. Wear that beautiful watch in good health! Cheers!
It’s the one watch. So many collectors with a plethora of fanciful watches, still fall in love with the Rolex Explorer 1. Interestingly, everyone has common AND differing reasons for it too.
I am a watch nut and subsequently have watched hundreds if not thousands of watch videos.
That sir is the best watch review I have ever seen. Have yourself a subscription!
Keep up the good work.
Praise indeed. Many thanks
This is the perfect time watch. My 124270 wears like no other.
Picked up my 36mm a few days ago. Absolutely love it!
Extraordinary review! Thanks for the little known factoid about Ian Fleming . I was only one years old in 1953 but the Rolex Explorer 1 is the watch I would have had if I had been of age :)
Great watch and review. I got mine last year. Really enjoy the simplicity of the watch but bought it essentially because of the history and the heritage.
I usually prefer to wear my OP 36 on a daily basis.
Already in 1953 Rolex secured the "Explorer" patent and since then the Explorer has been the favorite wrist watch of British author Ian Fleming, watchmaker Roger W Smith and zoologist Sir David Attenborough ... Subtle functionality and true elegant style !
The 1950s heralded the birth of the toolwatch, interesting socio-cultural background reading:
Tenzing's Two Wrist-Watches: The Conquest of Everest and Late Imperial Culture in Britain 1921-1953 (Oxford University Press - by Gordon T. Stewart) 🧐
Really enjoyed the video. My dad has a vintage omega Seamaster which was a long service present from British Steel. It is 36mm and still works even though he hadn't used it for years. You are right. Often less is more. What is the watch dealer community like in South Wales? I.e, how is their customer service?
Great content! I just picked mine up from my AD today and it's everything I learned about. It's truly amazing.
Calling my AD today to put my name down on the list!! love it!
Also anybody dogging on this watch for the size is DUMB!! 36mm was the standard male size for a long time.
Just got a call from AD, picking mine this week, so excited to have it on my wrist. Thanky you for your extraordinary review.
Hope you enjoy it!
I always lusted for an explorer, and waited for a good offer to buy the old 36mm. So when the new one was announced, I went to an AD the day after and asked to put me on the waiting list. I had no prior relationship to that AD, since I just recently transited from a broke medstudent to MD. But, luckily I guess, I got the call Dec/2021. Cheeres!
Great vid, I can tell you really enjoy it, wear it in health. Interesting point regarding the negative space on the 214270 which I have and adore, it's one of my favorite points of the watch as I think it magnifies the field watch exsperience for me and adds far more than the negative space takes away.
Agree, have worn mine for most of the last 15 months, since I got it. It could definitely be a one and done watch!
Simple is the best.
Not too big, not too small, the perfect size.
Good stuff.
My watch wrist is just over 7 1/2" and most of my dress watches are 36mm, I feel they look just about right (in fact my goto dress watch, an Omega Seamaster 471 is only 32mm). I never did like a dinner plate on my wrist. The Explorer 36mm is pretty much my grail watch, it's one of two luxury watches I intend to own, the Explorer and the Tag Heuer Monaco.
I like your approach, Chap, and thanks for the great video. Wear your Explorer in good health. Cheers!
I enjoy your videos you give a honest and detailed review .I recently got my Rolex explorer I followed your advice and received my explorer whin a year I’m very happy with my watch .I would like to thank you for your advice please keep up good work.
Thanks Allan
Delighted that you now have an Explorer on the wrist - it is such a great watch - enjoy in vigourous health sir.
Great review. You've made me want one for myself that much more! Thanks
Great video! I just got “the call before the call” from my AD letting me know that I’m expecting some good news in May
Great review. I’m a HUGE fan of the new 36mm Explorer. It’s top of my list, tied with the new 41mm Submariner. Depending on wait, I’m still not sure which one I want to buy first.
Great review ash! "The perfect companion" seems a fitting description of the Explorer.
The watch looks splendid on you! I'm noticing more and more classy and confident men wearing watches in the 36-39mm size. That is why the Black Bay 58 in the 39mm size is so popular (shrunk from 41mm)... Bravo on your amazing Explorer! Totally agree that it fits in every situation and will last a lifetime. This was a great review - thank you!
Thoroughly enjoyed this synopus, of the "Explorer." Simply put, this is a watch for the man, who has nothing to prove, to anyone. Rolex as a brand, rarely looks backward, on any choice they make. For them to return to the original case dimension, speaks volumes about the relativity of the 36mm size, in relation to the cohesion, of the overall design. Everyone makes note, of how "timeless," the "Submariner" design is, and to a certain degree, I would tend to agree. However IMHO, I believe the design, of this generation of the "Explorer," to be arguably more so. My hats off to you, Sir. Cheers....
Thank you for your excellent analysis in this video !!!
Brilliant video, I have been waiting 8 months for this watch it’s perfect for me, I’m not a small chap I think the size is purely preference I have vintage 40s omegas 33mm and 35mm and Tudor bb58 but also like 42mm they are all watches and all beautiful 👍
I’ve been trying to work the Everest thing out, and I agree that it sounds mostly like pure marketing. Although, I understand that they were creating prototypes of the Oyster Perpetual specifically for the Everest expeditions. It is possible that the watch Sir Edmund Hillary wore was in a technical sense, less a traditional Oyster Perpetual, and more an Explorer but without the label having been applied yet. I have read that they were technically modified for the expedition, but I have no idea if the Explorer actually contains those modifications, or even if those modifications continued in the Oyster Perpetual.
This
you're still missing that Daytona I'm afraid. Can't possibly claim you're done with Rolex until you get that.
I'll buy the 36mm instead of 40mm cause I want my single daughter to wear it for looong years after me in comfort, she loves watches, 36 is the size to go with...
Ash. Another great review. Of all the Rolex the Explorer is my favorite. I like the early submariner but not a fan of the Cyclops window. Although I would never be able to afford such a watch. I really like the Simplicity of the Explorer and the smaller size. I agree with you and that the watches have gotten bigger just because of fashion. I remember in the 70s big watches were considered for old people so they could read the dial better. I have my father's Bulova from the 50s and it is a 34 mm automatic self-winding watch with a Swiss Movement. I wear this on occasions and believe it or not get more compliments on it than other watches I own. Bigger isn't always better. Cheers Ron
I have placed my name in for an Explorer. Since I am a returning customer, I presume I will be getting a call from my AD soon.
This was an excellent review. I saw an exhibition model today for the first time at my AD. I absolutely loved it. By far this is now at the top of my list. Hopefully the AD can come through for me.
19:50 Totally my philosophy! Nice review mate.
The first con is beauty to my ears.
Enjoyed the review and glad that yours arrived: you’ve had some nice pieces enter your collection while you’ve been waiting. Agree with the review. It is a timeless demonstration of quality, style, and yes, I say value. For something that is of this quality, gains in value, and can/should be worn daily I think it’s a fair price if you’re able to get one. The history is nice but the pedigree is hard to argue with. Also passed on a larger Rolex because the proportion was not right for me: and I didn’t want to settle for what was available preferring to wait for the one that was right.
My name is Ash (sitting next to a fire!) I got my 36mm last year and bought it with a Speedy (at a discount!!!) well pleased with both, I'm just waiting for the Casio-Rolex collaboration next week...!!!!
Nice review Ash. I loved reading the comments, it shows how we all differ in our tastes. I own the 39mm 214270, which works well on a 7,5” wrist. When trying on the new 36mm my wife asked is that a lady’s version? It doesn’t matter what we buy, as long as we enjoy the experience, which is evident in your case. Health to wearing it.
Who else hits the like button as soon as his videos start? Hope everyone is having a good day!
The Smiths is a good and more viable Everest conquest watch if you like the story
I was very tempted to buy an Everest - it’s a lovely watch with an interesting back story, and I think a viable alternative to the Rolex for those on a budget.
@@simonhodgetts6530 It's a good-looking homage wrist watch as today's Smiths has nothing to do with the mid 20th century Smiths watch manufacturer (1946-1980 Cheltenham - UK).
Love it. I've got a 7 1/2" wrist people say it's too small... Is it heck
Great review as always Ash. I enjoyed the little bit of comedy infusion. “I like discretion” you’ve got a root beer and a Pepsi. 🤣🤣🤣. I agree with your comments on watch size. I have larger wrists and can pull off a 44mm panerai but also am happy with a 36mm too. If you love the watch or have a sentimental connection you should wear it no matter the dial dimensions.
I've been waiting for this review for a while now.....Thank You Ash!..... I've been waitlisted for the Explorer since the 1st week of January....I was offered the 2 tone variant in Feb....I passed on it.....I own a Bluesy and really didn't want another gold piece, especially considering how little I wear mine.... I want something under the radar for work....... I've been eyeballing the Tudor BB36 in the silver dial.
I have been waiting for someone to quote the actual diameter. Rolex are very flexible with their sizes. The older versions like the 114270 are also 35mm and not the stated 36nm.
Lovely lovely video - my exact thoughts - its the best original Rolex - i got the 36mm ( for the Mrs ) - i am now hunting a pre owned 39mm. The only thing i found was the bracelet was a bit tiny as i am used to the sub and my gmt.
I think the black dial makes it look a bit smaller than say a datejust of the same size but with a silver/champagne dial. That said, I love the originality of the smaller 36mm size.
Great review,I've been on the list for one of these since Xmas hopefully I get a phone call some time this year
just went for a boutique on mine, was available. I bought it.
no i'm a joking.
i had to wait 12 months.
That's my second explorer, and people did follow me in the street to steal it
Fully agree you have to try it on, I did and it felt small on my 7 inch wrist. It would not be my first choice but if I can get it from the AD I would make it part of my collection. Cheers!!
I've had mine for one month. I literally don't need another one.... ever
Love your take on this piece. Maybe you could do a compare and contrast video with the two-tone someday ^ ^