What Makes Microwave the Future of Anti-Drone Systems
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 11. 2023
- Microwaves, with their ability to precisely target and disrupt the electronic systems of drones, offer a non-kinetic solution that minimizes collateral damage and risks to human life.
Their capacity to engage multiple targets simultaneously and at a significant range enhances their tactical utility in a variety of scenarios.
Additionally, the rapid advancements in microwave technology, including improvements in power efficiency and miniaturization, suggest a future where such systems can be more portable, versatile, and integrated into a broader range of platforms.
Developed by Epirus Technologies, the Leonidas counter-drone system is a groundbreaking solution in the field of drone defense. It utilizes high-power microwave (HPM) technology to disable drones effectively. TThe system's design is compact and lightweight, facilitating deployment on various platforms, including vehicles and fixed installations.
Safety and collateral damage mitigation are vital aspects of the Leonidas system. Unlike kinetic countermeasures, such as missiles or lasers, Leonidas operates in a way that minimizes harm to humans and other electronic equipment. Its precision targeting ensures that only the intended drone is affected, aligning with ethical principles in modern warfare.
The Tactical High-power Operational Responder (THOR), developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory, is another significant player in the realm of counter-drone systems. Like Leonidas, THOR uses high-power microwaves to disable drones, but with some distinct technical specifications.
THOR operates in the same X-band frequency range as Leonidas (8-12 GHz) and boasts a power output of 100 kW, scalable up to 150 kW. This scalability enhances THOR's effectiveness against a broader range of drones, from small quadcopters to larger fixed-wing models. THOR's operational range matches that of Leonidas, covering up to 3.1 miles (5 kilometers), providing comprehensive protection against drone threats.
A key feature of THOR is its counter-drone capacity, which enables it to disable multiple drones simultaneously. This capability is essential in situations where swift and decisive action is required against numerous aerial threats. THOR's design is compact and transportable, requiring minimal setup time, which adds to its tactical advantages in various scenarios.
Join our CZcams channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
Support IE for high-quality journalism: interestingengineering.com/su... - Věda a technologie
⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
*SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
The name Leonidas is articulated in the way Greeks say it, which I guess is the "right" way. This is a really nice touch and attention to detail. Contrast it to the 300 movie articulation of the name.
I'd love to see the sources of these videos. It sounds like it was directly lifted from some marketing material.
Indeed
Instead of commenting, do 10 minutes of research. Also anyone with half a brain knows that an AI video is NEVER a source of information.
Microwave weapons aren’t new. It was only a matter of time before they were used on drones. They were previously used on humans, but it didn’t work well on us.
@@__logan__duvalier__ that’s not true. Only the R&D costs money. Energy weapons will be way cheaper my dude in full production
Nope. Its likely AI generated garbage.
5km of range is so fucking good. You could place a device like this in the frontline and say good bye to any kamikaze drone
And then an ATGM is going for you. They need more range or they going to be destroyed in seconds
@@Black-tc8mk 3 miles is good
First of all no. that's not how warfare works. These devices can't be on 24 hours a day. They are no different than air defense systems, which also can't be on 24 hours a day. and I'm guessing these things are probably expensive. so they're not going to be placed all over the place.
He said the front line, so presumably he was referring the groups within range.@@fishy2939
Claiming 5 KM, and showing 50 meters effect in the cideo - it's quite a HUGE difference, you know... Besides such powerful microwave systems will be visible on the radars with HUUUUUGE footprint, making them very volnurable to ANY artillery and mortar fire.
I missed the word ‘anti’ and icl my first thought was drones with microwaves 🤔 maybe Ubereats will start use this and I can finally get a McDonald’s delivered hot for once 😂😂
No
How the f could ammo costs surpass the cost of a 10 Million Dollar Tank?...
Isnt that just going to draw anti-radiation attacks.
I would try a powerful air jet like a leaf blower.
Is there any reference in this videos?
Don't be sure to your drone swamp too much 😂
Nope. Its likely AI generated garbage.
Must attack in different angles and directions. That's it
ive seen IDF has it actually on the front lines
Have a doubt, it's more likely you have seen Iron Dom standard grid array radar - they visually looks similar.
🇮🇱💪🇺🇦✌️
Oh yeah I’ve been speculating that this directed energy weapon made much more sense than lasers using it against humans it has the capability of incapacitating large amount of people in one shot large number of drones electronic components could be taken out of the fight with out concentrating a laser beam to burn down one drone well at least until A.I.drones come in line
then anti jammer drone will be invented...human is so advanced in adaptation..
Pretty dumb to show Skynex, the first ever system of which has been deployed just weeks ago, when talking about about traditional systems and the countermeasure being more expensive than the drone - when one $500 Skynex shell can destroy a dozen drones - as seen in the very shot taken from above, by propelling a cone of tiny tungsten balls into the target area.
I also wonder why the developer chose not to show exactly what everyone wants to see - the system downing even a single drone. Probably because it takes several seconds to have an effect, like the Skyranger's underpowered HEL, especially at longer distances.
Also fail to see how this is so much less dangerous. Say it's used in a non-combat setting, like protecting the World Cup, and a private plane passes through the ray somewhere behind the drone, causing even a minor malfunction.
A plane shouldn't be flying that low over a major city ever.... An air plane at the edge of the range should be fine due to shielding. However, that becomes less true the closer it gets. Remember, these drones don't have the weight margins for the same level of shielding as aircraft.
Lol microwaves can be shielded by aluminum foil that's slightly charged 😂 ffs
So if a drone surface is Aluminium, no effect? Tested?
Outrageous this could harm some birds 😮
All it takes is a Faraday Cage to block those waves. Seems like a minor and cheap modification to drones. Some chicken fence wrapped around the motors and mother board would probably do it.
Not with that power
@@Jul676869 I take it you have forgotten your 5th grade physics lessons.
1- if the microwave beam is potent enought, it could penetrate through gaps in the fence and overcome that shielding effect
2- Wrapping a chicken fence could greatly increase the drone's signature to radars, making it more vulnerable against radar-guided machine guns like Gepard
3- The fence holes diameter would need to be smaller than the microwave length, which is not always feasible
4- They would also need to be lightweight and attached in a way that does not affect the drone's flying capabilities
5- Any gaps, holes or improper attachment could provide a path to the microwave beam to reach the drone's internal components
6- wrapping a fence around a drone it's not an easy task as you could easily block the drone's communication with its land operator
Nice you had a lot of physics lessons but it seems like you skipped the engineering ones
@@mateusb09 I indeed skipped a lot of lessons, but I still know that there are all sorts of EM shielded devices in use and that we are not talking about magical science fiction high tech here.
Microwave ovens wouldn't be a thing if you couldn't shield them.
Aircraft are shielded against EMP.
Most military electronics are.
I was only bringing up chicken wire fence to point out that this can even be done as a simple retrofit to existing drones, but it wouldn't be a problem to just incorporate proper shielding into drones during their manufacturing.
I bet those larger drones they use to clear overland electrical wires are already shielded that way.
And antennae can be protected with spike protection fuses, so that they let through regular signals but block everything that would be potent enough to fry the electronics.
@@mateusb09 Argh ... another idiot with highschool degree talking above his pay grade.
Suuuure, always optimistic videos that trying to make it sound like its the new invincible wunderwaffe.
1) showing vidoe sof drones being downed at 100 Ft range, while claiming it as effective at 5 KM range. of course... Using it on frontlines is impossible, since 5 km is nothing even to tank guns and artillery.
2) they can't operate 24/7, they are very power-intesive.
3) their huge microwave footprint will be visible on any radar.
4) their microwave activity will cause cancer and neurological damage to all personel near it. (previously known cases)
Outdoor birds BBQ.
Poor wild living creatures , birds.
Why do you focus on them? Do you blind and not seen optical aiming station for operator?😂
laser is not kinetic
Ok, now send them to Ukraine for "extensive field testing".
they cant, because it is only effective 5 meters away ,,
@@vonilao2209 This isn't the home appliance from your kitchen.
Iron drome
Crap ... never heard of faraday cage ?!
Did you learn new word 😂
They need to be earthed to be effective
@@greggrimer354 airplane ???? [edit] cars ???? ... how f*** dumb are you ???
i dont like AMERICAN STYLE ,, published the theory, but THE ACTUAL IS 5 YEARS AWAY
Deick
Above 5km ??
Below 😂
Yes. In range, did you not see?
I doubt that.
weapon that really exceeds its owner! But if it's realistic, not propaganda!
What is your doubts? 🤔
@@santka3739The problem with this technology is the power output you would need to keep this thing running,and you can only use it in one direction.Jamming requires much less power and can jam in all directions not just have to focus on one direction.
@galvinstanley3235 wow! Aren't you a bicycle creator? 🤔
Just approach at ground level.
Aha, UNDER-ground 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not one has been tested in any combat setting - even simulated/experimental ones - but sure, the 'future' of anti-drone tech...!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
How do you know/sure of it? 😄
Do you know everything in the World? 😂
@@santka3739 Yes.
What a m0r0n!
Pretty sure it's the future of anti personal tech
if you guys had a woman narrating you’d get more views btw
This sounds utterly useless, sorry
Of course, mr.xPerd 😂
@@santka3739 ahahahaha so funny 🤣🤣
Every funny have some funny 😁
When strikes the things he knows nothing about.
@@santka3739 Yes, I agree with you 😃
They do not can atack with antiradiation missiles???🥸