The reason he didn’t most likely acknowledge her was because she was female the only reason he legitimized Fitzroy because he was so in fear of not having a male heir
Do we know what happened to Hester/Esther? If she survived long enough to have children with Harington, there very well may be living descendents of Henry after all.
A really fantastic episode. I appreciate the way in which you uncovered this important woman's life. Your research and thoughtful conclusions were welcomed. Congratulations too on the production values of the show. It is evident how the channel has developed over time.
Just when I thought 💭 I knew all about the Tudors, this channel offers something, or someone, that completely throws me--in this case, Ethelreda. This is the 1️⃣st I've heard of her, and, of course, I want to know more, if possible. Is there any more information on Ethelreda❓️
probably none. The majority of people who lived in the past have no descendants today. Think about families you have heard of: Abraham and Mary Lincoln, four children, nobody alive today (the last descendant died in 1985) . Ma & Pa Ingalls of the Laura Ingalls Wilder books, had five children, nobody alive today.(last descendant died in 1968). It fell to me to sort through a whole lot of my late mother in law's paraphernalia and there were boxes and boxes of photographs which had been passed down to her as other family members died. I had to decide what to do with them but it turned out to be easy: if they had no descendants, I threw the photos out. If you visit antique stores you will find lots of picture frames and albums full of photos, of people who have no descendants. We are all descended from a remarkably small number of ancestors.
@@abeal49 and Henry VIII was not all that fertile as monarchs go. He had several children by Cath of Aragon but then later on he only produced 2 by his later wives.
In my own family, our parents had five kids between 1946 and 1961. You might think we should all be grandparents by now, but only two of us are. My parents, who had 5 kids, have only 6 great-grandchildren.
@@abeal49 Same in our family. Five kids between 1957 and 1969; three of which produced five grandchildren and then four grandchildren produced six greatgrandchildren.
It was never the case (and still is not) that the English Monarchy ever practiced true Christianity. Those with great power usually serve the other master..... This is why and how the colonies became populated in America......with those who were true Christians, who were persecuted in England because of it, and sought to worship God in spirit and in truth. This impulse is dying out now in the USA, and this is the reason that we are at the end of the age, and the USA will be no more. In fact, the world will be no more. Jesus will take his own with him soon, and then the Tribulation begins, as preparation for the Kingdom of the one and only true King and Priest (the order of Melchisedec) Jesus Christ. Get on the ark now, while there's still time..... (spoken from a descendant of Henry Tudor and Mary Boleyn). Maranatha.
As marriages within wealthy families were usually arranged for status, connections and wealth, most of them were not love matches, but were made to protect assets for the children. There were so few marriages of affection within the upper classes that the few we know of are generally noted in histories, as they could come with penalties from the extended families involved, or even the Crown itself. While Ethelreda's husband may have been fond of her, he may have had a small window of opportunity to connect himself and his wealth to another family, and so made an offer as quickly as possible. A newly-made widow with property, or a daughter with a handsome dowry and several suitors became a business deal, arranged between the men of the families for mutual benefit.
I know right⁉️ Not to demean laundresses, but you'd think they'd be beneath a king's 👑 notice. Oh wait, this particular laundress WAS beneath a king 👑 ‼️
Methinks he didn't acknowledge her because he was highly desirous of having SONS, and she was just another daughter that he didn't want. Interesting history. Thanks
@@zettemueller4540 No, but Kit's full name is Kit Catesby Harington, and he's descended from Robert Catesby, one of the leaders of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Thank you for prompting me to discover that fascinating piece of information.
William & Mary were married in 1520. Catherine was born in 1522-1524 it’s fairly agreed upon that Henry began his affair with Mary around 1525. Henry was born in March of 1526. By May of 1527 Henry VIII is pursuing Anne. William died in June 1528. It’s possible that Catherine Carey was daughter of Henry. she was born before the affair is documented to have begun. But, not everything was documented. If she was born closer to 1524 & the affair started a before 1525, sure. But, as is the case with her brother, Mary would have been sleeping with William too. Having sex outside the marriage doesn’t mean it’s not your spouse’s kid. The timing is better for Henry Carey but I doubt he was Henry’s. It would be a decade before Edward’s birth. Fitzroy would have been 7 when Henry Carey was born. I honestly believe that if he believed Carey was his son, he’d have acknowledged him & groomed him for all the titles & power coming his way. There was no reason not to. Especially after William’s death (when Henry became Anne’s ward). It would have benefited the Boleyn family. Mary didn’t have some pure reputation to protect (predating Henry & William), and Henry wanted a son. I think he’d have claim him if he thought he was the father. There’s nothing unusual about nobility naming their children after the monarch in hopes of gaining favor & under Henry VIII they often did. He was as generous as he was brutal, & he showered his favorites with money & titles. Not just those who he was suspected of sleeping with or fathering. Pretty much anyone he liked benefited financially & socially. I don’t think either Carey children belonged to Henry but they benefited from his relationships to the family. There’s even less evidence that Ethelreda Malte was Henry’s daughter.
He did everything he could to have Edward and he treasured him as his beloved son and heir. He never knew his father’s displeasure. Fitzroy wasn’t planned, but was very much loved and favored by his father. He was showered with titles, wealth and affection. The only child that bore the full brunt of his wrath and abuse, and was old enough to comprehend what was going on, was Mary. Elizabeth was neglected, but never suffered like Mary did. Despite who her mother was, he did not treat her as cruelly as he did Mary.
@@carinafourie9119 Think again. He murdered her mother as she was at a very tender age of 3. From then on she must pay for her mothers execution and "funeral". She got not enough alimentation than she had not enough care to get proper dresses during her growth. Her caretaker as her only trust person was changed at the same time by a foreign person. The first 4 years in life are the most important. Mary`s mother died when Mary was 20. And was not murdered. She did not lost their only caretaker/trustperson and she got proper alimentation through her relatives. She never had to suffer physical negligence. She was 11 yo as the divorce of her parents became a topic, not 3. Mary had a big support group, Elizabeth as the Bastard had none during her childhood, she was left all alone. Elizabeth was subject of a kind of abuse through her stepfather Tom Seymour which almost led to her execution during her adolescent phase. Mary had not to suffer this kind of abuse. Mary was never imprisoned in the tower as she did with her younger sister later. So please tell me who suffered more bloody Mary or Elizabeth.
@@carinafourie9119 Elizabeth was also put in the Tower, just as her mother was, and had to face her greatest fears of death in her teenage years. Would history repeat itself? All of this molded her into the formidable ruler she eventually became. And why she never married, as well. This whole situation was underscored by the established Catholic faith being challenged by Protestantism, which lent a feeling of uncertainty throughout her life. Even though I do not think she practiced true Christianity ( she used astrologers, etc.), I do feel she was used by God to provide the seeds necessary for the eventual promulgation of Christianity throughout the world. A faith that focuses on Jesus Christ, and not on Mary, through false pagan Roman Catholicism.
She certainly has, Ethereda Malte was my 14 x g Grandmother, according to ancestry it goes down from Harrington to the Packingtons who were Knights, Barons, etc all very interesting and all speculation of course, there’s no actual proof
my grandfather took a DNA test and it said we were related to the king and that etherelda was the reason we are! not sure how true it is but it still would be cool!
It is too bad that any of these children being his cannot be proven by DNA testing. Mary Boleyn is my 13th Great Grandmother. It would be wonderful to know if her daughter Catherine Carey-Knolly's was Henry VIII's daughter. He never claimed her or Mary's son but we know Mary was a mistress of his.
There is much evidence to support that she was indeed his daughter. From another descendant of Mary Boleyn and Henry Tudor. And, I believe that Catherine Carey was a full on Bible believing Christian, and most likely received that from her mother. And so, I would say that I am grateful to have her as a progenitor. From Henry, I am not so sure.
@@susannahfox7188 Thank you for the information. Like you. I'm grateful to have Mary and Catherine as a progenitor but I'm conflicted about Henry. Could you point me in the direction to look for more evidence? Again, thank you.
I sincerely believe that when Henry VIII had a horse riding accident where he fell on his head and was knocked unconscious for several hours-- well, after that accident Henry’s temperament was drastically different. I think that accident changed Henry. Not for the better.
that is likely because if she was his he would not want to acknowledge her to him she was another useless daughter if she had been a boy he may have at least secretly acknowledged the child maybe I mean I do not buy that he cared about Anne's feelings as he id cut her head off duh but Anne was not one to sit and look the other way while Henry was spreading his seed all over England! that is partly what got Anne killed she would not let him do as he pleased Henry did not appreciate being told off which Anne did in particuilar when she caught him and Jane alone together at a party and Jane Seymour is on his lap meanwhile Anne is carrying his baby son she later miscarried which he also blamed on her and killed her for
Fascinating speculation, but I’m disappointed that there are no sources quoted for these assertions. Like many other people commenting, this is not a name I had previously encountered, as a potential Tudor by-blow, despite living near St Catherine’s Court for nearly twenty five years.
@@glen7318 Ba hah hah! See previous comment (& do your research). Bessie Blount, Ann Boleyn, Mary Boleyn, & numerous others, just from the top of my head. And he had 2 sons, one legit & one not.
Interesting but upset over the breaking in of ads and the fact that there was nothing but continuous pictures of Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. Surely you can find something else to show other than that and the cottage near Bath.
Seriously why was it more acceptable. For men to have mistresses, but not women?? But also I heard something. About queen's and or noble women. Could have someone else, after giving her husband children. But it was hush, hush and wasn't documented. Unlike the way we know now of many men, king's and so on do.
The reason for this prejudice is that women can carry an off spring, could be anybody if she has sex with someone within the same time frame. Or while her husband was away. Men got scared and didn’t want to raise a child that isn’t their own.
one reason is they need an a legit heir to the throne but this rule largely was to Henry I never heard of any other man beheading his wife over an alleged affair you did not cross Henry he was a Narcissist Psychopath you did not cross nor Question him and when Anne did she stood up to him about his flirtations with Jane that sealed her fate
Mary bolenyn was Anne sister who he use to date. That's why elizabeth was deemed "illegitimate." Mary was "illegitimate" because Catherine widowed his brother.
Mary Boleyn was an acknowledged mistress of Henry the 8th and sister to his second wife Anne Boleyn. The mention of the fact that it is believed the Henry fathered, but did not acknowledge Mary Boleyn’s children, is just another weird fact.
Mary Boleyn was Anne’s sister not Henry’s wife. Anne Boleyn was Henry’s second wife she was beheaded because she was accused of sleeping around and Elizabeth the 1st was seen as illegitimate because of Anne plus Elizabeth wasn’t a boy. That’s why Mary Stewart Elizabeth’s cousin had the strongest claim to the English throne because of her grandmother Margaret Tudor who was the oldest daughter of Henry 7th and Elizabeth of York. Elizabeth the 1st was one of the strongest monarchs that was ever made. It was Elizabeth who created the golden age and ruled for 45 years alone.
I don't buy any of this. Henry VIII went to such extraordinary measures to produce living progeny, and as king he could acknowledge and legitimize anybody he wanted, it makes no sense to say he had kids he never acknowledged.
@@RissaFirecat he was the King. Both Mary and Elizabeth were declared illegitimate and then legitimate again. He could do that with any of his offspring once he separated from the Church of Rome. Then when his son Edward became king, the new king declared them illegitimate again. he was persuaded to designate Lady Jane Grey as his heir instead of his older half-sisters Their status as illegitimate lasted until Edward VI died, and then Mary I took over and declared herself to be the legitimate heir, and because she was the monarch, she could do that.
Hope springs eternal. The old fool always thought he would father a son til the last wife probably and wouldn't want any bastard at some point putting forth a claim. He knew how the Tudors made their original claim but now history says they became monarchs thru right of conquest--make up your mind history. Did they have a right to fight for it--why not the milkman? And, that wasn't the first askew taking of the English throne. Nor the last.
@@richardw3470 I think he put Henry Fitzroy in the line of succession, thereby legitimizing him. By the end of his life he knew he wasn't going to site any more offspring
@@RissaFirecat also known as narcissism, at the hands of which I have suffered greatly - children to a narcissist are seen as extensions of the narc, and as such, are not people in their own right in the narc's mind. Does that not make sense in how Henry raised up and tore down his children according to his latest whimsy?
A lot of very vague information. Henry likely had illegitimate offspring scattered around all over who will never be known about. Possibly modern DNA information might reveal some more Tudor descendants.
why would she leave the Tudor era though she does have videos on other people don't like it don't watch it she can do what she likes and we like it too
It's her channel so it's her content. She does a lovely job and her videos are very relaxing. There are plenty of Tudor nuts out there myself included. You are welcome to scroll along to find someone more to your taste. 😒😑
No such thing as illegitimate children, only illegitimate parents.
Amen to that!
Agreed
💯
💯💯👏🏽👏🏽
The reason he didn’t most likely acknowledge her was because she was female the only reason he legitimized Fitzroy because he was so in fear of not having a male heir
he did not legitimise Henry FItzroy. I dont hink any British soveriegn has ever legitmised one of his children outside wedlock
@@glen7318 I’m sorry “acknowledged”
Ethelreda got the better end of the bargain vs her alleged royal half siblings, imo.
Good lord, I thought I knew a lot about the Tudors, having read a lot of biogs. I was aware of Henry Fitzroy, but not Ethelreda! Thank you for this!
INTERESTING. never heard of this woman, and I have read a lot about the Tudors. learned something new today!
Me, too‼️
That’s exactly what I said! And great name! 😉
@@phineasthegreat2402 ANOTHER Phineas!!! my name came from my cat....who was named after the character phineas in a separate peace.
@@phineas117 my Phineas is that handsome boy in the picture! He’s named after a Harry Potter character.
@@phineasthegreat2402 Phineas Nigellus Black
I’ve been a Tudor fanatic for 2 decades and I’ve never heard of this one. Great video, thank you!
Same here!
A Tudor I had not heard of - thank you so much for this little treasure!
Do we know what happened to Hester/Esther? If she survived long enough to have children with Harington, there very well may be living descendents of Henry after all.
My wife is a direct relative of Ethelreda Tutor.. She was her 11th grandmother going back in time..
A really fantastic episode. I appreciate the way in which you uncovered this important woman's life. Your research and thoughtful conclusions were welcomed. Congratulations too on the production values of the show. It is evident how the channel has developed over time.
Just when I thought 💭 I knew all about the Tudors, this channel offers something, or someone, that completely throws me--in this case, Ethelreda. This is the 1️⃣st I've heard of her, and, of course, I want to know more, if possible. Is there any more information on Ethelreda❓️
You know when it’s interesting when it has king Henry the 8th
Yeah,whenever I see the borgias or the Tudors I immediately click
@@Lana96269 ikr it’s like your brain like hmmm ahh yes the tudors I remember then
It would be interesting to know how many relatives of Henry VIII are running around the world today. Probably tends of thousands.
probably none. The majority of people who lived in the past have no descendants today. Think about families you have heard of: Abraham and Mary Lincoln, four children, nobody alive today (the last descendant died in 1985) . Ma & Pa Ingalls of the Laura Ingalls Wilder books, had five children, nobody alive today.(last descendant died in 1968).
It fell to me to sort through a whole lot of my late mother in law's paraphernalia and there were boxes and boxes of photographs which had been passed down to her as other family members died. I had to decide what to do with them but it turned out to be easy: if they had no descendants, I threw the photos out.
If you visit antique stores you will find lots of picture frames and albums full of photos, of people who have no descendants.
We are all descended from a remarkably small number of ancestors.
@@abeal49 and Henry VIII was not all that fertile as monarchs go. He had several children by Cath of Aragon but then later on he only produced 2 by his later wives.
@@glen7318 genetic defects and syphilis will do that to a man.
In my own family, our parents had five kids between 1946 and 1961. You might think we should all be grandparents by now, but only two of us are. My parents, who had 5 kids, have only 6 great-grandchildren.
@@abeal49 Same in our family. Five kids between 1957 and 1969; three of which produced five grandchildren and then four grandchildren produced six greatgrandchildren.
For the head of his own church, 🙄Henry should have taken Thou shalt not kill and Thou shalt not commit adultery more seriously.
Rules apply to thee, not to me comes to mind lol
It was never the case (and still is not) that the English Monarchy ever practiced true Christianity. Those with great power usually serve the other master..... This is why and how the colonies became populated in America......with those who were true Christians, who were persecuted in England because of it, and sought to worship God in spirit and in truth. This impulse is dying out now in the USA, and this is the reason that we are at the end of the age, and the USA will be no more. In fact, the world will be no more. Jesus will take his own with him soon, and then the Tribulation begins, as preparation for the Kingdom of the one and only true King and Priest (the order of Melchisedec) Jesus Christ. Get on the ark now, while there's still time..... (spoken from a descendant of Henry Tudor and Mary Boleyn). Maranatha.
It was expected of kings to be desirable to all women
The speed with which Ethelreda’s husband remarried makes me wonder if he killed her, you never know.
As marriages within wealthy families were usually arranged for status, connections and wealth, most of them were not love matches, but were made to protect assets for the children. There were so few marriages of affection within the upper classes that the few we know of are generally noted in histories, as they could come with penalties from the extended families involved, or even the Crown itself. While Ethelreda's husband may have been fond of her, he may have had a small window of opportunity to connect himself and his wealth to another family, and so made an offer as quickly as possible. A newly-made widow with property, or a daughter with a handsome dowry and several suitors became a business deal, arranged between the men of the families for mutual benefit.
Rapid remarriage was not unusual at this time and environment.
You learn something new every day. Thank you.
Wow I never heard this until now!!! Amazing 🎉
Good job, really doing your homework. Thanks.
👸🏻
Not sure he was that picky....what was the short list of women he DIDN'T sleep with?
I know right⁉️ Not to demean laundresses, but you'd think they'd be beneath a king's 👑 notice. Oh wait, this particular laundress WAS beneath a king 👑 ‼️
@@dianetheisen8664 or on top....we don't know....ha
@@markgarin6355 LOL
Even though she threw herself at him like a Chelsea harlot, he refused to sleep with Nancy Pelosi.
Methinks he didn't acknowledge her because he was highly desirous of having SONS,
and she was just another daughter that he didn't want.
Interesting history.
Thanks
Just finding this video! I discovered recently that Ethelreda is one of my 14th great grandmothers. So I’m glad to have found more info on her! 😊
Well, that's a new name for me! Thank you for the lesson!
I would LOVE to know more of his illigitimate children. Im sure David Starkey would know more, I wonder why he hasnt done episodes dedicated to them.
Because the only illegitimate child Henry had was Henry Fitzroy. All the rest that people put forward are without real evidence.
Great video as always
Very informative. Are we aware of any descendants via the marriage with Sir John Harington ?
?
I was wondering if the current actor in Game of Thrones and the sequel ,Snow, Kit Harrington was related. He played the part of Jon Snow.
@@zettemueller4540 No, but Kit's full name is Kit Catesby Harington, and he's descended from Robert Catesby, one of the leaders of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Thank you for prompting me to discover that fascinating piece of information.
All the Kings were pretty much the last word. King Henry VIII was desperate for a legitimate son to carry on the monarchy and stabilize the crown.
Catherine and Henry Carey were believed to be Henry's children.
William carey..
@@louisehesketh9231 william was the husband of mary
William & Mary were married in 1520.
Catherine was born in 1522-1524
it’s fairly agreed upon that Henry began his affair with Mary around 1525.
Henry was born in March of 1526.
By May of 1527 Henry VIII is pursuing Anne.
William died in June 1528.
It’s possible that Catherine Carey was daughter of Henry. she was born before the affair is documented to have begun. But, not everything was documented. If she was born closer to 1524 & the affair started a before 1525, sure. But, as is the case with her brother, Mary would have been sleeping with William too. Having sex outside the marriage doesn’t mean it’s not your spouse’s kid.
The timing is better for Henry Carey but I doubt he was Henry’s.
It would be a decade before Edward’s birth. Fitzroy would have been 7 when Henry Carey was born. I honestly believe that if he believed Carey was his son, he’d have acknowledged him & groomed him for all the titles & power coming his way.
There was no reason not to. Especially after William’s death (when Henry became Anne’s ward).
It would have benefited the Boleyn family. Mary didn’t have some pure reputation to protect (predating Henry & William), and Henry wanted a son. I think he’d have claim him if he thought he was the father.
There’s nothing unusual about nobility naming their children after the monarch in hopes of gaining favor & under Henry VIII they often did.
He was as generous as he was brutal, & he showered his favorites with money & titles. Not just those who he was suspected of sleeping with or fathering. Pretty much anyone he liked benefited financially & socially.
I don’t think either Carey children belonged to Henry but they benefited from his relationships to the family.
There’s even less evidence that Ethelreda Malte was Henry’s daughter.
@@gypsydonovan yeah they were Elizabeth’s cousins, they’re part of her court
Henry the 8th is the illegitimate son of Zeus.
I agree with you.
I love medieval history (studied at uni) how have I not heard of this!! ❤
Since Henry did his best to destroy his children's lives, Ethereda would be the luck one, if she was his daughter.
He did everything he could to have Edward and he treasured him as his beloved son and heir. He never knew his father’s displeasure. Fitzroy wasn’t planned, but was very much loved and favored by his father. He was showered with titles, wealth and affection. The only child that bore the full brunt of his wrath and abuse, and was old enough to comprehend what was going on, was Mary. Elizabeth was neglected, but never suffered like Mary did. Despite who her mother was, he did not treat her as cruelly as he did Mary.
@@carinafourie9119 Think again. He murdered her mother as she was at a very tender age of 3. From then on she must pay for her mothers execution and "funeral". She got not enough alimentation than she had not enough care to get proper dresses during her growth. Her caretaker as her only trust person was changed at the same time by a foreign person. The first 4 years in life are the most important.
Mary`s mother died when Mary was 20. And was not murdered.
She did not lost their only caretaker/trustperson and she got proper alimentation through her relatives. She never had to suffer physical negligence.
She was 11 yo as the divorce of her parents became a topic, not 3. Mary had a big support group, Elizabeth as the Bastard had none during her childhood, she was left all alone.
Elizabeth was subject of a kind of abuse through her stepfather Tom Seymour which almost led to her execution during her adolescent phase.
Mary had not to suffer this kind of abuse. Mary was never imprisoned in the tower as she did with her younger sister later.
So please tell me who suffered more bloody Mary or Elizabeth.
@@carinafourie9119 Elizabeth was also put in the Tower, just as her mother was, and had to face her greatest fears of death in her teenage years. Would history repeat itself? All of this molded her into the formidable ruler she eventually became. And why she never married, as well. This whole situation was underscored by the established Catholic faith being challenged by Protestantism, which lent a feeling of uncertainty throughout her life. Even though I do not think she practiced true Christianity ( she used astrologers, etc.), I do feel she was used by God to provide the seeds necessary for the eventual promulgation of Christianity throughout the world. A faith that focuses on Jesus Christ, and not on Mary, through false pagan Roman Catholicism.
Fabulous thanks
Within two months of her untimely death her husband remarried? Hmm. Quite suspicious indeed.
@AnneBoleynFiles Hello Claire, I have never heard of this daughter of Henry VIII. Any information? Thank you!
Wonder if this woman has descendants, if so then Henry the 8 world have direct descendent a which would be so cool
She mentioned that she had a daughter so that's possible
She certainly has, Ethereda Malte was my 14 x g Grandmother, according to ancestry it goes down from Harrington to the Packingtons who were Knights, Barons, etc all very interesting and all speculation of course, there’s no actual proof
Etheldrada is my great grandmother
It’s pure speculation but an interesting case to be made.
A Tudor I have not heard of before, thank you. Now subscribed
my grandfather took a DNA test and it said we were related to the king and that etherelda was the reason we are! not sure how true it is but it still would be cool!
It is too bad that any of these children being his cannot be proven by DNA testing. Mary Boleyn is my 13th Great Grandmother. It would be wonderful to know if her daughter Catherine Carey-Knolly's was Henry VIII's daughter. He never claimed her or Mary's son but we know Mary was a mistress of his.
There is much evidence to support that she was indeed his daughter. From another descendant of Mary Boleyn and Henry Tudor. And, I believe that Catherine Carey was a full on Bible believing Christian, and most likely received that from her mother. And so, I would say that I am grateful to have her as a progenitor. From Henry, I am not so sure.
@@susannahfox7188 Thank you for the information. Like you. I'm grateful to have Mary and Catherine as a progenitor but I'm conflicted about Henry. Could you point me in the direction to look for more evidence? Again, thank you.
I’d be interested to speak with you sometime as my father was very into genealogy and said we were related to the Carey children as well.
I sincerely believe that when Henry VIII had a horse riding accident where he fell on his head and was knocked unconscious for several hours-- well, after that accident Henry’s temperament was drastically different. I think that accident changed Henry. Not for the better.
Wow another
You learn something new every day! 🤓
Henry Viii illegitimate son Fitzroy also died young.
I'm not sure that I knew that he had a daughter born on the wrong side.of the blanket.
I would imagine he had several sons and daughters born on the wrong side of that blanket lol
that is likely because if she was his he would not want to acknowledge her to him she was another useless daughter if she had been a boy he may have at least secretly acknowledged the child maybe I mean I do not buy that he cared about Anne's feelings as he id cut her head off duh but Anne was not one to sit and look the other way while Henry was spreading his seed all over England! that is partly what got Anne killed she would not let him do as he pleased Henry did not appreciate being told off which Anne did in particuilar when she caught him and Jane alone together at a party and Jane Seymour is on his lap meanwhile Anne is carrying his baby son she later miscarried which he also blamed on her and killed her for
@@aprilgosa5779 Agreed
Fascinating speculation, but I’m disappointed that there are no sources quoted for these assertions. Like many other people commenting, this is not a name I had previously encountered, as a potential Tudor by-blow, despite living near St Catherine’s Court for nearly twenty five years.
I wouldn't doubt it if he has other illegitimate children. Lots of unknown royals could be walking around today.
You don't understand that the illegitimate children do not have Royal status.
Yeah, he got around. DNA tests would be enlightening.
@@nobodysbaby5048 he didnt get around. He had only 2 known mistresses and only 1 acknowledged son by one of them
@@glen7318 Ba hah hah! See previous comment (& do your research). Bessie Blount, Ann Boleyn, Mary Boleyn, & numerous others, just from the top of my head.
And he had 2 sons, one legit & one not.
Interesting but upset over the breaking in of ads and the fact that there was nothing but continuous pictures of Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. Surely you can find something else to show other than that and the cottage near Bath.
Sad
Isn't Mary boleyn Josh Widdecombes relative
I've NEVER heard of this daughter....interesting. ☺👍🏽
Seriously why was it more acceptable. For men to have mistresses, but not women?? But also I heard something. About queen's and or noble women. Could have someone else, after giving her husband children. But it was hush, hush and wasn't documented. Unlike the way we know now of many men, king's and so on do.
The reason for this prejudice is that women can carry an off spring, could be anybody if she has sex with someone within the same time frame. Or while her husband was away. Men got scared and didn’t want to raise a child that isn’t their own.
one reason is they need an a legit heir to the throne but this rule largely was to Henry I never heard of any other man beheading his wife over an alleged affair you did not cross Henry he was a Narcissist Psychopath you did not cross nor Question him and when Anne did she stood up to him about his flirtations with Jane that sealed her fate
I wonder how many kids he actually had
not many, that is pretty certain, He only had 3 surviving children who were legitimate and one acknowledged illegitimate son
Henry the 8th did not recognize the child , as his solely because she was a girl .
And you know this how?
the caption is wrong, his 2nd wife was anne boleyn not mary boleyn
Mary bolenyn was Anne sister who he use to date. That's why elizabeth was deemed "illegitimate." Mary was "illegitimate" because Catherine widowed his brother.
Mary Boleyn was an acknowledged mistress of Henry the 8th and sister to his second wife Anne Boleyn. The mention of the fact that it is believed the Henry fathered, but did not acknowledge Mary Boleyn’s children, is just another weird fact.
It reads: ‘the sister of his second wife’. It is correct.
Mary Boleyn was Anne’s sister not Henry’s wife.
Anne Boleyn was Henry’s second wife she was beheaded because she was accused of sleeping around and Elizabeth the 1st was seen as illegitimate because of Anne plus Elizabeth wasn’t a boy.
That’s why Mary Stewart Elizabeth’s cousin had the strongest claim to the English throne because of her grandmother Margaret Tudor who was the oldest daughter of Henry 7th and Elizabeth of York.
Elizabeth the 1st was one of the strongest monarchs that was ever made. It was Elizabeth who created the golden age and ruled for 45 years alone.
Interesting
I don't buy any of this. Henry VIII went to such extraordinary measures to produce living progeny, and as king he could acknowledge and legitimize anybody he wanted, it makes no sense to say he had kids he never acknowledged.
Why not? He was such a prick that any excess is not surprising!
@@RissaFirecat he was the King. Both Mary and Elizabeth were declared illegitimate and then legitimate again. He could do that with any of his offspring once he separated from the Church of Rome. Then when his son Edward became king, the new king declared them illegitimate again. he was persuaded to designate Lady Jane Grey as his heir instead of his older half-sisters Their status as illegitimate lasted until Edward VI died, and then Mary I took over and declared herself to be the legitimate heir, and because she was the monarch, she could do that.
Hope springs eternal. The old fool always thought he would father a son til the last wife probably and wouldn't want any bastard at some point putting forth a claim. He knew how the Tudors made their original claim but now history says they became monarchs thru right of conquest--make up your mind history. Did they have a right to fight for it--why not the milkman? And, that wasn't the first askew taking of the English throne. Nor the last.
@@richardw3470 I think he put Henry Fitzroy in the line of succession, thereby legitimizing him. By the end of his life he knew he wasn't going to site any more offspring
@@RissaFirecat also known as narcissism, at the hands of which I have suffered greatly - children to a narcissist are seen as extensions of the narc, and as such, are not people in their own right in the narc's mind. Does that not make sense in how Henry raised up and tore down his children according to his latest whimsy?
I usually look out for the misandrists.
Please, whoever is writing the intro to this - have a copy editor help you.
Another girl
Hmmm, it’s good to be king hey ???
Not when you stand before God.....
Did she have any descendant?
Yes
me
A lot of very vague information. Henry likely had illegitimate offspring scattered around all over who will never be known about. Possibly modern DNA information might reveal some more Tudor descendants.
This wasn't a bad episode. I do have to say they've been uninteresting lately.
Also, maybe jump out of the Tudor period.
why would she leave the Tudor era though she does have videos on other people don't like it don't watch it she can do what she likes and we like it too
It's her channel so it's her content. She does a lovely job and her videos are very relaxing. There are plenty of Tudor nuts out there myself included. You are welcome to scroll along to find someone more to your taste. 😒😑
@@imaginempress3408 Oh I do. Thank you for letting me know that I'm allowed to don what I already do.
Simp
@@aprilgosa5779 Simp
@@HabrenOdinsdottir Simp❓️