Which other epic conquerors would you like to see a long-format documentary on, and why? For the full Early Modern History playlist: czcams.com/play/PLiPhmAD3I2JwdVOt4lI39d3XENLktUgP5.html
@@Qoral-ef5rz And Napoleon himself was famously an admirer of Nader and had read about all of his campaigns. I even remember reading somewhere that one of his actual nicknames _was_ "Nader of France" (but I'm not sure how true this is). So, I think calling Napoleon "Nader of France" would be more justified than calling Nader "Napoleon of Persia."
@@TG_MOGATEAM ohh you know about history. So why are you come here in this video. May be you come here for advertisement of Nader shah. Lol average kid.
As an Iranian I thank you for this. Nader Shah must be one of our most underrated Shahs. Everyone always talk about Cyruce the Great or Shah Ismail but we Iranians, especially Turkmens respect and love Nader Shah a lot. He was a true hero that protected our land.
@watup3494kurds were always nomadic in nature and are of iranic origin. There's a reason they're spread over from Syria, Turkey and Iraq all the way to northern Iran. It's not about a single ethnicity here bro. Iranians are not only Farsi.
@watup3494turkmens are from what's present day Turkmenistan. They have mongoloid genes in them just like all of Centra Asia and even beyond but they're a different people.
He sacked Delhi, but didn't annex it. But regardless, his actions cemented the decline of Muslim power in India. He and his protégé Abdali all but guaranteed that the Mughals, and other North Indian Muslim nobles, would lack the resources to rule. And a few generations later, it led to Muslims being limited to the peripheries of India (i.e. Pakistan and Bangladesh).
@@soroushmahmoudiandehkordi4858 The Mughals were already in decline, having fought civil wars and rebellions for years. By the time Nader showed up at Delhi, the Mughal emperor literally just opened the gates for him... but that didn't stop him from ransacking the place. Anyways, my main gripe with him is that he basically caused the complete loss of Muslim-ruled India.
@@Qoral-ef5rz they were declining but Moghuls in Karnal had army twice of Nader’s, that make sense since india were much bigger and more populated. Still he managed to defeat them. And yes, what he did in delhi was barbaric.
“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
If you had just told me he beat the Ottomans, that would have been proof enough of his status. Amazing how he perfected the use of artillery just like Napoleon.
If you think that's impressive, wait until you hear about the Afghan Hotaks. They overthrew the Safavids, and then beat back the Ottomans when they tried to restore their traditional rivals to the Iranian throne. That's a 2-in-1. Nader came after them.
Napoleon stopped searching when he was defeated, but Nader Shah was defeated only once in his life, by Topal Pasha of the Ottoman Empire. After his defeat, he quickly returned to Iran and prepared an army. People from all over Iran came to his aid. Topal still Not happy for his victory, when Nader's new army reached him, Nader fought again with Topal and defeated Topal Pasha and killed him in the middle of the battle. He sent Topal Pasha's body to Istanbul with respect. Nader the Great was a legend.
The Afghans were not capable of overthrowing the Safavids. After suppressing the Afghans, Nader Shah dismissed the Safavids and established the Afshariya in a meeting in the Mughan plain.@@Qoral-ef5rz
I've read that one of the positive aspects of his rule was that he ended sectarianism between Shias and Sunnis in Iran, and he created a council of scholars which consisted of both Sunni and Shia Ulema. This changed the trend of shia domination of the Safavid era.
One propaganda video after another, first the “false history Sikhs”-then now Nadir shaw lo!!!! Nadisha Durani and Ahmed sha Durrani were both Pashtuns and from the same tribe, Nadir shar lived in Iran so he had the support Iranian people and Ahmed sha lived in Afghanistan so he had the support of All Pashtun and Afghanistan thus it was an alliance formed to deal with another Pashtun tribe that was an enemy to the Durani tribe and the easily toppled them and it was the end. Mirwas Khan Hatooki was the one who had taken over all those areas but the hotooki are sort of enemies to Durani both Pashtun tribe thus both were Pashtuns and both made history -now the Pakistani and the Indian and some English men who are jealous are trying to rewrite history, on one side they use the false history Sikhs who could not even hold on to Peshawar city while being armed to the teeth by the British empire and even lost Hazar that use to be inside Panjab yet today they tell super men stories about themselves all because of Jealousy or fear of the Pashtun people , unfortunately it was the same issue with the Turks the red fort was built by Lodi dynasty a Pashtun family and also the rest of the building were built by Sher sha sur who was born in India but was the descendants of Lodis and his tomb was copied by the Mogul and they made Taj Mahal while they painted the Red fort red on purpose to hide the real beautiful white colour, Taj Mahal colour was the colour of red fort before they painted it red because now no one knows thus jealous with the Pashtuns has been going on for centuries but God give them more because they are simple sort of people who seek the Glory of Allah rather their own.... Look how the world is surprised by Afghanistan speedy development so little money....
@@democracyforall Not everything is some grand conspiracy against you. Nader was a Turkoman according to all credible sources, including official Iranian ones. He proudly said as such when sending letters addressed to Ottomans. He was NOT Pashtun, but he did use them (including Abdalis). Do you not feel any shame being this desperate to claim a Turk as your father? This isn't even the first time, I know some Pashtuns say that Khalaj Turks (Khaljis) are also Pashtuns...
First of all Napoleon was the Nader Qoli of Europe. But there was one big difference Nader Shah won all of his battles except one and he never has to surrender like Napoleon.
Napoleon literally had to fight the most powerful countries on earth and not only defeated them but until 1809 he made it look exceptionally easily. Even after 1809 the allies were only able to beat him by copying him and not engaging him directly in combat until they had overwhelming superiors in numbers. They’re both brilliant but there’s a reason Napoleon is considered the best.
@@Yellow-kp9gs Nader was also fighting ottomans and moghuls which were super powers of their time. They were declining, but I think Ottomans were still way more powerful than any other European country at that time.
@@soroushmahmoudiandehkordi4858 Ottomans we’re largely in decline by this point- the Austrians often sent more men to fight the French in this period than they did to fight the ottomans. The Mughal empire was also doing poorly in this period, which is also mentioned in this video. Regardless Nadar never had to fight multiple great powers/coalitions at once, many of which contained the most powerful armies and empires in the world. Nadar was great but Napoleon was the far better general.
@@Yellow-kp9gs that’s true. But France was industrialized country during Napoleon. Iran was not and it was in decline for so many years and it was a divided country.
The comparison between Napoleon and Nader is deeper and more fitting than it may appear. Like Napoleon-who dreamed of uniting all of Europe under the banner of France-Nader had dreams of uniting the Islamic world under the banner of Iran-both of them failed. Both of these guys were also nationalists and thought that their country is superior to all the rest. They were both brilliant commanders, politicians and conquerors, and lived during the same historical period (Early Modern period), separated by only a few decades.
Nadir Shah was not an Iranian nationalist, but a Turkish supremacist. Even though they were often his enemies, he respected the Ottoman Empire and adopted them as a role model for his own state.
@@Spartan_DisiplinYou don't know Nadershah at all, you got all the information from the pages of Pan Turk, Nadershah is known as the greatest nationalist and superior among Iranians, read his story yourself to understand why Iranians They love him very much. He gave us pride, he is the reason for our hope for the future Nader was more Iranian than me Now go cry and be jealous of our glorious history and count the number of Iranian and Ottoman battles and see which country has the most victories.
He didn't invent Jaafarism, he adapted the name so it can be acceptable to suunis who follow 4 schools to make them five schools in Islam, Jaafarism is 12ver shia and 12ver shia is Jaafarism, yes he tried to use it for his own ambitions by changing and adding, somethings he was right about others he wasn't, at the end he is not scholar but a warlord who tried to replicate the sunni warlords
He was Tafzili Jafari. Shi’ism comes in two major strains Tafzilism and Rafidism. Although he was a Rafidi earlier on in his life he began to lean towards Tafzilism later on. Many early adherents of Zaydi or Jafari Madhab were in fact Tafzili.
@@Therock151214 Yeah maybe it's the case, but at his time their were no tafdilis, these were called Zaydis, 12ers were all rafidis, probably it was a political move to lore the sunnis for his own interests, jaafaris were never tafdilis, tafdilis were at the time of Imam Ali who followed him politically not theologically when he held power, Imam Jaafar As-Sadeq wasn't born yet, those were just shia politically called tafdili
@@zxera9702 Yes all are, except negligible individuals Apparently Nader shah wanted to appease the sunnis by accepting the 3 for his own political and self interests
“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
@@ME.ARTLOVER thank you thats interesting because in kurdish its called (nigarkishe) when its a painting with people in it and (wenakishi) is when its a painting without people :)
Nader's empire at its peak was larger than Napoleon's empire at its peak. So It is more accurate to say Napoleon was Nader of the west rather than Nader was Napoleon of the east. Also you failed to mention that Nader firmly believed in separation of religious establishments from state. Naader was a great warrior and war tactician but not a statesman. He went mad during the last years of his reign. But never the lest he saved Iran.
Thank's for making this video! Nader Shah is a very underrated but badass figure in history. I'm glad that your bringing his exploits and conquests to light!
@@HikmaHistory “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
The culture and military history of this region is very interesting and largely overshadowed by later western military domination and the Ottomans. Iran was using modern gun powder technology while napoleons ancestors were still in diapers. Very interesting video, told well too. Thank you
Thanks for the hard work in producing this documentary. I read long ago that GODEN PEACOCK THRONE he took from Delhi-- India was the main asset against which Iranians issued their currency until oil was discovered.
The artefacts of high culture has always been attractive for invaders! Unfortunately, persians couldn't value it and had already dismantled the peacock throne to sell its gold and diamonds
That's why there is a distinction between warring cultures and cultures with artistry, knowledge and wisdom. I am not saying Persia isn't a great culture but if you look at mongols,dagestanis,afgans it becomes evident.@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5f
Nader 17 years after the fall of the capital of Iran, he conquered India, the country of Iran was in a state of chaos, but how did Nader Kabir turn that country into a superpower in Asia? Nader's last campaign was against the Ottomans. Nader Shah had 375 thousand soldiers with him to show his power🇮🇷💙🇮🇳
@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Even now Indian subcontinet is too divided to be conquered again by other powers. We're divided into different religious factions I.e Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians etc who want to establish their own absolute rule over entire subcontinent and always fight among themselves. India has been in a state of chaos since Aurangzeb Alamgir died and power struggle started in this region
Loving your channel. Thank eu4 for me finding you. Love to see more on the spread of Islamic culture into India & Southeast Asia. Mughals, bahamanis, malacca, etc.
Nader was an excellent and competent turkic leader of afsharid clan. Such a shame after his death kingdom weakened and fell into the hands of the persianoid zand dynasty, which during their reign the kingdom decreased to a desert land consisting only of persian majority region which is nowadays central Iran. Great video btw❤
Nadir Shah is a Trojan horse that entered the Islamic world. It weakened the Ottomans who were fighting the Crusaders in the west. He fought against the Turans who fought against the Russians in the north. Since Turan was weakened, the Russians captured Turan in these years. He disgraced the Mughal empire, which led to local tribal uprisings in India. Taking advantage of the weakness of the Mughal Emperor in the south of India, non-Muslim Indians, in cooperation with the British, destroyed the weakened Mughal Empire. The effect is still felt today. His sect is none of my business. When I look at the results, he always fought with Muslims. The wars he fights are wars fought only to satisfy his own ego.
An apt way to put it. He is like Timur, in this sense. Timur caused the Ottoman Interregnum, puppeteered Turco-Mongol Khans, and destabilized the Tughlaq dynasty in India. Nader did basically the same thing, but in the early-modern age. As for his religion, his official espousal of a heretical sect is condemnable enough. But it's possible he was an atheist.
hey I really enjoy all you good stuff. watching your channel so some time now. why don't you make longer documentries like for 1 hour. do they get less view or what
I read book about him. It describes how Persia was constantly financially broke because he needed the money to fund his armies. So he used his armies to raid neighbours. His Indian “conquest” was nothing more than raid. He was a constant thorn to the Ottomans. Defeating them several times. He “innovated” a special type of mobile artillery. Camels had small cannons strapped to them. Like a medieval Toyota with a .50Cal gun. The biggest what if was when he nearly went to battle against the Russians. The Russian had a Prussian style army and doctrine. It would have been interesting how his tactics would do well against Prussian military doctrine.
Sir , there is nothing called Persia , this name was used for the first time during pahlavi dynasty about 60 years ago , he wanted to claim Iran as an Persian country but it ended with a bloody revolution , Safavids were Kurdish , Afsharyds were Kurdish , Zands were lure , Qajars were Azeri , Pahlavi was Persian , it's a disrespect to call iran Persia
@@refikkartaler2081 I'm one of the Afsharyds family , we live in Khorasan, we still have our Afsharyds unique culture and dances 😂😂😂 internet is a free source , use it honey
@@personalmobile9421 Kurds are Iranians, so jus tell people to say Iranian. My mother is Kurdish from Bukan Iran, and we are fully aware of being Iranians. If you look at those Iranian ethnicities you listed, they all share almost the same genetics.
@@agostocobain2729 but the revolutionaries are saying different , the (Jin Jian Azadi) movement says something else , you are not a Kurd , you are a (Jash) If you are sure about Kurds to consider themselves as Iranian , then why are they fighting , why they got the republic of Mahabad , or i have a suggestion , why don't your beloved Iran government is not making a voting ??? More than 1500 kurdish people got executed by Iran , yes yes we love Iran 😂😂😂 Edit: I found your other comments , you introduced yourself as an Azeri 😂😂😂 I knew you are not Kurd
Napoleon left durable institutions on which modern France was built up, including the Napoleonic Code, the judicial system, the central bank and the country's financial organization, military academies, and a centralized university. What this Naderjan left? What is his legacy? Nothing!!!
Built the worlds strongest army in less than a decade, translated the Bible and other works into Farsi, placed agreements with Ottomans which allowed Iranians to go on pilgrimage to Mecca, regained all of irans lost lands + wasn’t exiled like a wuss on a cozy island 🏝️😂 all whilst being a nobody shepherd and Napoleon grew up in nobility and all the military training in the world
@@reeyees50 You have to prove it bro! What was the identity before then? What did jurisprudence look like in Safavid dynasty? How did Nader change it? Why did Nader change it? Based on what you think this legacy still exists? What made this legacy survive ?
@@reziinho1414 Did this "strongest nomadic army" could take any Ottoman city? Booooom! Bingoooo! hahaha Napoleon changed the course of history, dude! Nader just regained former Safavid land! Another bingo ahahaha
Legend has it that his subordinates assassinated him because they suspected him of having a secret alliance with the enemies of Islam. The British Empire (in India), Russian Empire (in north), & Austrian Empire (against Ottomans) greatly benefited from Nader's wars and raids.
Some speculate that Nader was an atheist himself. But regardless of personal belief, Shia states have a history of antagonizing the Sunnis around them. The Fatimids, Safavids and even the Khomeinis are guilty of this too.
It was an absolute pleasure to prepare the first draft of the script for this video. I see how you have improved on it to fit a video format better. Hi Everyone, I'm a historian of the early modern Turco-Persianate world at St Andrews University in Scotland, and I had the pleasure of meeting Hikma all the way back during my PhD. I'm doing my best to bring the research we do in academia to a wider audience through platforms such as CZcams, and this is part of that. I am currently working to get my research monograph on post-Safavid and Naderid Iran published with a university press, and I am curious to see what kind of topics you find interesting on this subject (Iranian imperial identity? Nader's military reforms? the structure of his empire? his claims to the legacy of Timur? his religious reforms to unify Shia and Sunni?). -Amir
it would be great if you could prepare a video about the relationship between iranian dynasties and turkmen subjects since the latter was main part of rebellious groups and the core part of imperial army. as far as I know all of irans turkic dynasties used Turkmen to found their empire but then all those dynasties had to fight against turkmen at some point.
It would be interesting to see new findings about the legitimacy issue of Nodir. Obviously, Nodir was quite a weak figure in terms of legitimate power. Therefore, it would be interesting to research to understand to what extent Nodir's legitimacy was weak and what was Nodir's vision on establishing his legitimacy to rule
Hikma is wrong he didnt sought to unify the islamic caliphate. Nor did he lean toward any sides like sunni or shia. He had an agnostic view about islam. He just used islam to gain his political views just like timur did. Nader shah had secular views.
Praise be to Nader, the Lion in wolves' clothing who claimed Farr through sheer might and force of will alone, and made Eranshahr the mightiest military in the world for the third time in her glorious history. It's a shame he wasn't much of a ruler and politician though. Kaddi to the core, in all the good and bad ways. Should've still been Shahanshah given the fact that there were no other competent alternatives at the time, but definitely should've left all the mundane affairs of ruling to a competent vizier, just like all the other decent cold hearted brute kings did throughout history.
19:48 Majority of the inhabitants of Hindustan , as the name suggests, are Hindus. During Mughal rule, Muslims formed around 10-20 % of the population. Due to uneven birth rates ( Muslim birth rate being higher) and subsequent conversions, the proportion of Muslim population did increase. But even now in 2024, Muslims form only around 1/3rd of population of the subcontinent. • Total population of the subcontinent = 1.4 billion (India) + 250 million (Pakistan) + 186 million (Bangladesh) = 1.836 billion • Total Muslim population = 220 million (India) + 240 million (Pakistan) + 170 million (Bangladesh) = 630 million Now, we calculate the percentage: approx 34.3 %
Dude, joking aside (you know I always have to be mean), this is a really good video. I'm legit cancelling my video on Nader Shah because of this. Amazing work!
There was no Afghanistan during that period so when you were using the word Afghanistan or Afghans during the video, were you referring to a tribe of people or A country that didn't exist yet??
HIKMA HISTORY! Why did you skip the part with Tamerlane's curse????? in 1740, Nader stole the gravestone of Tamerlane because he idolized Timurids. The next morning Iran woke up from a terrible devastating earthquake, then uprising in Dagestan, then Nader blinded his own son. Shocked by this consequence of events, Naderjan immediately brought the gravestone back to Guri Emir mausoleum.
@@reziinho1414 this story has no historical basis behind it. As far as I know, there is no evidence to suggest that Timur ever even visited this person's tomb. Or even mentioned about such person. Just bullshit!
In this poem, Nader Shah says that he will devastate Iran in response to the popular uprisings that broke out while he was in India: ''No other response is possible Than what is refected in the mirror of my soul. To quell the uprisings in every direction I will send forth armies, Storm with apocalyptic swarms, And eradicate all peace from that land. I will shadow my troops, And reduce Iran to dust'' Mohammad ‘Ali Tusi (Ferdowsi-e Thani), Shahnameh-ye Naderi, ed. Ahmad Sohayli Khwansari, Tehran: Anjoman Athar-e Melli, no. 36, 1339/1960, 212 (vv. 4988-91)
About the Turkic origin of Nader Shah Afshar and the Afsharid dynasty: "Born in November 1688 into a humble pastoral family, then at its winter camp in Darra Gaz in the mountains north of Mashad, Nāder belonged to a group of the Qirqlu branch of the Afšār Turkmen. Beginning in the 16th century, the Safavids had settled groups of Afšārs in northern Khorasan to defend Mashad against Uzbek incursions." "Nāder's focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder's coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moğān steppe a quriltäy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a "Turkmen" ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word "Turkmen" to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Gozz tribes, but to Timur's descendants as well." - Encyclopædia Iranica, Nāder Shah
@@theheroickhan “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure the shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
Nader was a super intelligent leader, a man who was raised in the army his whole life, and who conquered most places with sheer intelligence. He really modernized the Persian army. Although you did a fantastic job adding multiple paintings throughout the video, I wished you would have added some real photos from his tomb and his guns and uniform as well. Overall, a fantastic video, and thank you so much.
Here's the corrected version: "Dude, Iran is always Iran. People who live on the Iranian plateau are called Iranians. Don't associate the great people of Iran with your ethnicity. If you want to praise Turks, find someone in Turkey.. @@Afshar1
What? Are you cool, bro? Firstly, last time I checked, Iran has two Azerbaijan provinces! Go check it out, bro. Then, for your information, all those places that you are mentioning (Central Asia, Afghanistan, and Azerbaijan as of now, assuming you're from there!) were part of the Safavid and then Afsharid Empires. Nader was a Shia leader who conquered many places. Also, for your information, he defeated the Ottoman Empire (Turkey-your beloved ethnicity, which I assume you're very proud of) under Topal Pasha in the Battle of Kirkuk. (Link here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topal_Osman_Pasha) And you're saying that the Afsharid Empire was Turkic? What are you talking about? We never had a Turkic empire; we never had such a thing. Please educate yourself, and instead of talking about divisive ethnic standpoints, learn some history......@@Afshar1
@@foadooo there's many turkic empires which fought with each other, so your words has no matter. Safavid, Afsharid and Qajars is turkic empires, i have a lot of sources about it.
why is Ahmed Shah Durrani not called as the 'Last Asiatic conqueror'? His empire was only slightly smaller than Nader and he also attacked and won against 3 civilizations. Persia, Steppes and India @Hikma History
Nader the Great became king from nothing and defeated the Ottomans, Russia and India, Ahmed stole part of Nader's wealth and attacked India, which was in ruins.
@@literallynothinghere9089 Marathas only faced a temporary setback at Panipat in 1761. Just 10 years later in 1771 Marathas recaptured Delhi & Panipat from the Rohillas to recover their power back over North India. 2nd Anglo-Maratha War 1803 was the real knockout punch from which the Marathas never recovered again
Academic Minorsky describes his native language as "Turkish of Azerbaijan." He wrote letters to Ottoman Vizier Hakimzade and Muhammed Shah of Moghols in Azerbaijani turkic. Abraham III of Armenia (Kretatsi), the Catolicos met and stayed with Nadir Shah and quoted him in his book in armenian alphabet. Those quotes are indistinguishable from modern-day Azerbaijani.
The fact that Taliban foaming in the mouth ,dreaming about capturing Tehran while seeing them selves as modern incarnation of Hotak fighting shia Rafezi is disturbing. Listening to the majority of Taliban leadership and hearing about delusions/dreams, make this episode way more terrifying( at least for me ).
@@Qoral-ef5rz Was it Iran or Shia Islamists.Iran has faced two massive uprising in the last four years and Islamists survived barely each time.if the progressive forces overthrew the Islamists,given the experience with Islamism,Iran is going to be the most secular state in the world even more secular than French lacite. Every opposition parties from far left to center right is talking ,and has planned for years to deislamisize Iran in every aspect Icluding: Society, culture, economy and politics. So CHILL!
who cares about what some leftists dream. even the progressives won iran cant be more secular than turkish. you can try but you would fail just like others before you had failed. sociology of the given culture should be well understood before claiming such bullshit. @@Ramtin-Blue_rose
I never heard anyone call nader asian napoleon, indian napoleaon is emperor samudragupta, but nader did not conquer or expand his territories, he just sacked and left...even his neighbouring afghanistan was independent under duraanis
Pls don't Glorify him - he was cause of Multiple massacres in present day Pakistan and Northern India. Rivers of blood Flew when he attacked Civilians in Delhi. Later his Pupil Ahmad Shah Abdali Invaded Punjab and north India 14 times for loot and massacre
Exactly. Then don't glorify temujin, timur, alexander, muhammad, richard the lionheart etc. etc. etc. Otherwise you'll just keep making the same mistakes.
Ahmad Shah Abdali was a traitorous fool, but Nader Kabir was a legend, I am an Iranian and I love Indians, please investigate why Nader Shah ordered to kill in Delhi, Indians wanted to kill him and kill 1000 Iranians. Iranians don't kill for no reason, no Iranian king has ever done this, you can research the justice of Cyrus the Great, Nadir Kabir was not a monster either.
@@Poiytiyou are living in your own dream bubble. If Indian wants to kill persian then we don't gave shelter to persian communities in earlier times. Indians Don't went to Iran, he came over India. That coward mughal surrendered over him.
@@persianguy1524About the Turkic origin of Nader Shah Afshar and the Afsharid dynasty: "Born in November 1688 into a humble pastoral family, then at its winter camp in Darra Gaz in the mountains north of Mashad, Nāder belonged to a group of the Qirqlu branch of the Afšār Turkmen. Beginning in the 16th century, the Safavids had settled groups of Afšārs in northern Khorasan to defend Mashad against Uzbek incursions." "Nāder's focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder's coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moğān steppe a quriltäy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a "Turkmen" ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word "Turkmen" to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Gozz tribes, but to Timur's descendants as well." - Encyclopædia Iranica, Nāder Shah
@@theheroickhan “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
@@Afshar1 Turks are Persians who were attacked by Mongols During the Achaemenid period, Türkiye belonged to the land of Persia You can search in Google
@@Afshar1about his tribe there is conflicts some groups say he was kurd and other say he was azari but the thing is important he was shah of iran as he claimed himself as shah of iran not turk not arabs not afghans he was shah of iran
this is a very interesting video. I think though the last great Asian conqueror is maybe Ibn Saud, who conquered most of Arabia after starting out as a refugee in Kuwait and then seizing Riad, or possibly Mao, who conquered China. Nader Shah conquered a bigger land mass than Ibn Saud but he was still a mghty conqueror
“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure the shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
@@persianguy1524 Besides territorial integrity, two alternative concepts of sovereignty to replace the crumbling dynastic ideal can be discerned in Nadir Shah's negotiations with the Ottomans in the 1730s. Nadir proposed equal relations based, first, on Ottoman recognition of the legitimacy of Twelver Shiism as a fifth school of orthodox Islamic law. And second, he proposed something akin to an ethnic or national concept - equal relations based on Nadir Shah's identity as a member of the noble Turkmen family of peoples." Howard, D. (2017). A History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.192 To justify his stance and claim a common heritage with the Ottomans, he invoked the history of Chinggis Khan: In the time of Chingiz Khan, the leaders of the Turkman tribes, who had left the land of Turan and migrated to Iran and Anatolia, were said to be all of one stock and one lineage. At that time, the exalted ancestor of the dynasty of the ever-increasing state [the Ottoman Empire] headed to Anatolia and our ancestor settled in the provinces of Iran. Since these lineages are interwoven and interconnected, it is hoped that when his royal highness learns of them, he will give royal consent to the establishment of peace between [us]. In a letter presented to the Ottomans after his assumption of the title of shah in 1736 Nadir claimed legitimacy simply as a Turk, stating that “kingship is the ancestral right of the exalted Turkmen tribe.” Thus the rulers of the regional states - the Chinggisid khans of Khiva, the Timurid/Chinggisid Mughals, the Ottomans, and Nadir himself, all had equal legitimacy. Furthermore, in a deliberate attempt to reverse the abandonment of the glorification of Genghis-Khanid descent as a ''branch of the tree of unbelief'' by Ismacil, Nadir tried to revive the pre-Safavid Turkman tribal principles of legitimacy, which had not been given currency since the fifteenth century. In a letter to the Ottoman grand vizier, Nadir states that the dignitaries of Iran gathered in the plain of Mughan "elected our august Majesty to kingship and sovereignty which are the hereditary prerogatives of the noble Turkman tribe." Mulla cAli Akbar, his Mulla-bashi, opens his pan-Islamic sermon in Kufah with the eulogy of Nadir not only as the shadow of God on earth, but also as the scion of the Turkman tree and heir to Genghis Khan. However, after Nadir's death, Safavid descent, often with a marked emphasis on its religious character, remained the most viable ground of legitimacy for rulership. Expectation of the Millennium : Shiìsm in History Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. State University of New York Press pp.194
@@persianguy1524 Despite his obscure background, he looked born for the throne. Nature endowed him with all the great qualities that make heroes ... His dyed beard made a sharp contrast with his completely gray hair; his natural physique was strong, tall, and his waist was proportional to his growth; his expression was gloomy, with an oblong face, an aquiline nose and a beautiful mouth, but with his lower lip protruding forward. He had small penetrating eyes with a sharp and piercing gaze; his voice was rude and loud, although he knew how to soften it on occasion, as required by personal interest... Dalrymple, William; Anand, Anita (2017). Koh-i-Noor: The History of the World's Most Infamous Diamond. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 48-60. Sounds Turkic 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Afshars were part of the Qizilbash, and many of them still do refer to themselves as such. They were Turks of Azerbaijan, not Turkmenistan. Afshars are still a living clan in Iran (although almost nothing remains of their clan unity today except a surname). I've never heard of Afshars in Turkmenistan of all places 🤔
Which other epic conquerors would you like to see a long-format documentary on, and why?
For the full Early Modern History playlist: czcams.com/play/PLiPhmAD3I2JwdVOt4lI39d3XENLktUgP5.html
Nader Shah was born earlier, right? So is Nader really the "Asian Napoleon"? Or is Napoleon the "European Nader"? 🤔
@@Qoral-ef5rzyup I always thought the same he did it before napoleon
This thought crossed my mind multiple times in the production for this video!
@@Qoral-ef5rz And Napoleon himself was famously an admirer of Nader and had read about all of his campaigns. I even remember reading somewhere that one of his actual nicknames _was_ "Nader of France" (but I'm not sure how true this is). So, I think calling Napoleon "Nader of France" would be more justified than calling Nader "Napoleon of Persia."
The story of Ertugrul
Nader Shah was before Napoleon. Napoleon is the European Nader Shah
ever heard about ranjit singh
@@AncientRelicTalesLol just some regional kings nothing else 😂
@@TG_MOGATEAM nepoleon of iran not asia 😂. You make own happiness
@@Memory1234-h8r Says an ignorant with no knowledge of history
@@TG_MOGATEAM ohh you know about history. So why are you come here in this video. May be you come here for advertisement of Nader shah. Lol average kid.
As an Iranian I thank you for this. Nader Shah must be one of our most underrated Shahs. Everyone always talk about Cyruce the Great or Shah Ismail but we Iranians, especially Turkmens respect and love Nader Shah a lot. He was a true hero that protected our land.
@watup3494kurds were always nomadic in nature and are of iranic origin. There's a reason they're spread over from Syria, Turkey and Iraq all the way to northern Iran. It's not about a single ethnicity here bro. Iranians are not only Farsi.
@watup3494turkmens are from what's present day Turkmenistan. They have mongoloid genes in them just like all of Centra Asia and even beyond but they're a different people.
Yes bro, Nader Shah is underrated for sure. He was a great leader and a military genius.
@watup3494 YOUR MOM IS FROM MONGOLIA
@watup3494 Ya ne ezik milletsiniz siz 😂
Great Nader. Only 17 years after fall of Isfahan, he conquered Delhi.
He sacked Delhi, but didn't annex it. But regardless, his actions cemented the decline of Muslim power in India. He and his protégé Abdali all but guaranteed that the Mughals, and other North Indian Muslim nobles, would lack the resources to rule. And a few generations later, it led to Muslims being limited to the peripheries of India (i.e. Pakistan and Bangladesh).
@@Qoral-ef5rz yes it was impossible, to rule there. But even defeating of Moghuls was a masterpiece of his genius and leadership.
@@soroushmahmoudiandehkordi4858 The Mughals were already in decline, having fought civil wars and rebellions for years. By the time Nader showed up at Delhi, the Mughal emperor literally just opened the gates for him... but that didn't stop him from ransacking the place. Anyways, my main gripe with him is that he basically caused the complete loss of Muslim-ruled India.
@@Qoral-ef5rz they were declining but Moghuls in Karnal had army twice of Nader’s, that make sense since india were much bigger and more populated. Still he managed to defeat them. And yes, what he did in delhi was barbaric.
“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
If you had just told me he beat the Ottomans, that would have been proof enough of his status. Amazing how he perfected the use of artillery just like Napoleon.
If you think that's impressive, wait until you hear about the Afghan Hotaks. They overthrew the Safavids, and then beat back the Ottomans when they tried to restore their traditional rivals to the Iranian throne. That's a 2-in-1. Nader came after them.
Napoleon stopped searching when he was defeated, but Nader Shah was defeated only once in his life, by Topal Pasha of the Ottoman Empire. After his defeat, he quickly returned to Iran and prepared an army. People from all over Iran came to his aid. Topal still Not happy for his victory, when Nader's new army reached him, Nader fought again with Topal and defeated Topal Pasha and killed him in the middle of the battle. He sent Topal Pasha's body to Istanbul with respect. Nader the Great was a legend.
The Afghans were not capable of overthrowing the Safavids. After suppressing the Afghans, Nader Shah dismissed the Safavids and established the Afshariya in a meeting in the Mughan plain.@@Qoral-ef5rz
@@Qoral-ef5rz They had a brief surge but it’s still nothing compared to Nader’s accomplishments.
@PhilipIIofMacedon-ww8in Yes, Nader Shah suffered a lot of losses in Dagestan, but in the end he conquered Dagestan
I've read that one of the positive aspects of his rule was that he ended sectarianism between Shias and Sunnis in Iran, and he created a council of scholars which consisted of both Sunni and Shia Ulema. This changed the trend of shia domination of the Safavid era.
One propaganda video after another, first the “false history Sikhs”-then now Nadir shaw lo!!!! Nadisha Durani and Ahmed sha Durrani were both Pashtuns and from the same tribe, Nadir shar lived in Iran so he had the support Iranian people and Ahmed sha lived in Afghanistan so he had the support of All Pashtun and Afghanistan thus it was an alliance formed to deal with another Pashtun tribe that was an enemy to the Durani tribe and the easily toppled them and it was the end. Mirwas Khan Hatooki was the one who had taken over all those areas but the hotooki are sort of enemies to Durani both Pashtun tribe thus both were Pashtuns and both made history -now the Pakistani and the Indian and some English men who are jealous are trying to rewrite history, on one side they use the false history Sikhs who could not even hold on to Peshawar city while being armed to the teeth by the British empire and even lost Hazar that use to be inside Panjab yet today they tell super men stories about themselves all because of Jealousy or fear of the Pashtun people , unfortunately it was the same issue with the Turks the red fort was built by Lodi dynasty a Pashtun family and also the rest of the building were built by Sher sha sur who was born in India but was the descendants of Lodis and his tomb was copied by the Mogul and they made Taj Mahal while they painted the Red fort red on purpose to hide the real beautiful white colour, Taj Mahal colour was the colour of red fort before they painted it red because now no one knows thus jealous with the Pashtuns has been going on for centuries but God give them more because they are simple sort of people who seek the Glory of Allah rather their own.... Look how the world is surprised by Afghanistan speedy development so little money....
@@democracyforall Not everything is some grand conspiracy against you. Nader was a Turkoman according to all credible sources, including official Iranian ones. He proudly said as such when sending letters addressed to Ottomans. He was NOT Pashtun, but he did use them (including Abdalis).
Do you not feel any shame being this desperate to claim a Turk as your father? This isn't even the first time, I know some Pashtuns say that Khalaj Turks (Khaljis) are also Pashtuns...
First of all Napoleon was the Nader Qoli of Europe. But there was one big difference Nader Shah won all of his battles except one and he never has to surrender like Napoleon.
Napoleon literally had to fight the most powerful countries on earth and not only defeated them but until 1809 he made it look exceptionally easily. Even after 1809 the allies were only able to beat him by copying him and not engaging him directly in combat until they had overwhelming superiors in numbers. They’re both brilliant but there’s a reason Napoleon is considered the best.
Matter of perspective
To the west, Nadar Qoli was the Napoleon of Asia
To the Islamic world, Napoleon was the Nadar Qoli of Europe
@@Yellow-kp9gs Nader was also fighting ottomans and moghuls which were super powers of their time. They were declining, but I think Ottomans were still way more powerful than any other European country at that time.
@@soroushmahmoudiandehkordi4858 Ottomans we’re largely in decline by this point- the Austrians often sent more men to fight the French in this period than they did to fight the ottomans.
The Mughal empire was also doing poorly in this period, which is also mentioned in this video.
Regardless Nadar never had to fight multiple great powers/coalitions at once, many of which contained the most powerful armies and empires in the world.
Nadar was great but Napoleon was the far better general.
@@Yellow-kp9gs that’s true. But France was industrialized country during Napoleon. Iran was not and it was in decline for so many years and it was a divided country.
The comparison between Napoleon and Nader is deeper and more fitting than it may appear.
Like Napoleon-who dreamed of uniting all of Europe under the banner of France-Nader had dreams of uniting the Islamic world under the banner of Iran-both of them failed. Both of these guys were also nationalists and thought that their country is superior to all the rest. They were both brilliant commanders, politicians and conquerors, and lived during the same historical period (Early Modern period), separated by only a few decades.
Nadir Shah was not an Iranian nationalist, but a Turkish supremacist. Even though they were often his enemies, he respected the Ottoman Empire and adopted them as a role model for his own state.
Except that Napoleon is not criminal meanwhile Nader is criminal
@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Napoleon wasn't a criminal?
If white-worshipping was a crime you'd be on death row.
@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Pajeet Napoleon killed more innocent people then nadir ever did.
@@Spartan_DisiplinYou don't know Nadershah at all, you got all the information from the pages of Pan Turk, Nadershah is known as the greatest nationalist and superior among Iranians, read his story yourself to understand why Iranians They love him very much.
He gave us pride, he is the reason for our hope for the future
Nader was more Iranian than me
Now go cry and be jealous of our glorious history and count the number of Iranian and Ottoman battles and see which country has the most victories.
He didn't invent Jaafarism, he adapted the name so it can be acceptable to suunis who follow 4 schools to make them five schools in Islam, Jaafarism is 12ver shia and 12ver shia is Jaafarism, yes he tried to use it for his own ambitions by changing and adding, somethings he was right about others he wasn't, at the end he is not scholar but a warlord who tried to replicate the sunni warlords
He was Tafzili Jafari. Shi’ism comes in two major strains Tafzilism and Rafidism. Although he was a Rafidi earlier on in his life he began to lean towards Tafzilism later on. Many early adherents of Zaydi or Jafari Madhab were in fact Tafzili.
@@Therock151214
Yeah maybe it's the case, but at his time their were no tafdilis, these were called Zaydis, 12ers were all rafidis, probably it was a political move to lore the sunnis for his own interests, jaafaris were never tafdilis, tafdilis were at the time of Imam Ali who followed him politically not theologically when he held power, Imam Jaafar As-Sadeq wasn't born yet, those were just shia politically called tafdili
Aren't 12ers all rafidis considering they don't accept the caliphate of the first three caliphs as per the definition "rejectors"?
@@zxera9702
Yes all are, except negligible individuals
Apparently Nader shah wanted to appease the sunnis by accepting the 3 for his own political and self interests
“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
i like the historical Iranian llustrations the art style is very cool and cartoony :)
Yea Nader shah was the Persian napoleon
@@Techtalk2030
my comment was about the art .... are you a bot automatically replying to people or did you reply to my comment by mistake.
We call it( Negargari) a part of many majors of Iranian painting
@@ME.ARTLOVER
thank you thats interesting because in kurdish its called (nigarkishe) when its a painting with people in it and (wenakishi) is when its a painting without people :)
@@samankucher5117 interesting❤️
Nader's empire at its peak was larger than Napoleon's empire at its peak. So It is more accurate to say Napoleon was Nader of the west rather than Nader was Napoleon of the east. Also you failed to mention that Nader firmly believed in separation of religious establishments from state. Naader was a great warrior and war tactician but not a statesman. He went mad during the last years of his reign. But never the lest he saved Iran.
Brother you know what he did in Delhi and north india. He almost took all of india's wealth.
Thank's for making this video! Nader Shah is a very underrated but badass figure in history. I'm glad that your bringing his exploits and conquests to light!
Interesting and informative, thank you!
Glad you enjoyed it!
@@HikmaHistory “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
The culture and military history of this region is very interesting and largely overshadowed by later western military domination and the Ottomans. Iran was using modern gun powder technology while napoleons ancestors were still in diapers. Very interesting video, told well too. Thank you
Napoleon should be called Western Nader, not the other way round
Excellent presentation, as usual. Dense but very well-paced 🏅🏆⭐️
Excited to watch!
My guy!
Thanks!
My pleasure, thanks Michael!
This was great, thank you.
Thanks for the hard work in producing this documentary.
I read long ago that GODEN PEACOCK THRONE he took from Delhi-- India was the main asset against which Iranians issued their currency until oil was discovered.
The artefacts of high culture has always been attractive for invaders! Unfortunately, persians couldn't value it and had already dismantled the peacock throne to sell its gold and diamonds
That's why there is a distinction between warring cultures and cultures with artistry, knowledge and wisdom. I am not saying Persia isn't a great culture but if you look at mongols,dagestanis,afgans it becomes evident.@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5f
@@r.4996 Persian culture is just as old and sophisticated as Indo-Aryan culture. Nader was a Turkoman.
Excellent narration! Good material.
Fresh material. Cool. 😎 I’m digging the channel, brother. ❤
Much appreciated
Oh how interesting and informative and excellent ...is this utube chanel of yours .Thank you so much❤❤❤❤
Thank you!
Nader 17 years after the fall of the capital of Iran, he conquered India, the country of Iran was in a state of chaos, but how did Nader Kabir turn that country into a superpower in Asia? Nader's last campaign was against the Ottomans. Nader Shah had 375 thousand soldiers with him to show his power🇮🇷💙🇮🇳
Dude he didnt conqure india he just sacked delhi and went home 😑
In india we only study him as part of decline of mughal empire which he sealed
Supporters of Nader are not our brothers 😢
@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy why india is always an easy target of foreign powers I really wonder sometimes
@@KanuniSuleyman4857 bcz of weak rulers who fought among themselves
@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Even now Indian subcontinet is too divided to be conquered again by other powers. We're divided into different religious factions I.e Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians etc who want to establish their own absolute rule over entire subcontinent and always fight among themselves. India has been in a state of chaos since Aurangzeb Alamgir died and power struggle started in this region
Your videos and content are getting more refined by the day. Great job and dera manana!
Loving your channel. Thank eu4 for me finding you. Love to see more on the spread of Islamic culture into India & Southeast Asia. Mughals, bahamanis, malacca, etc.
Excellent video.
Very informative ❤
Nader was an excellent and competent turkic leader of afsharid clan.
Such a shame after his death kingdom weakened and fell into the hands of the persianoid zand dynasty, which during their reign the kingdom decreased to a desert land consisting only of persian majority region which is nowadays central Iran. Great video btw❤
Nadir Shah is a Trojan horse that entered the Islamic world. It weakened the Ottomans who were fighting the Crusaders in the west. He fought against the Turans who fought against the Russians in the north. Since Turan was weakened, the Russians captured Turan in these years. He disgraced the Mughal empire, which led to local tribal uprisings in India. Taking advantage of the weakness of the Mughal Emperor in the south of India, non-Muslim Indians, in cooperation with the British, destroyed the weakened Mughal Empire. The effect is still felt today. His sect is none of my business. When I look at the results, he always fought with Muslims. The wars he fights are wars fought only to satisfy his own ego.
And when he died, all that he worked for vanished. He was a force imposing his own will, and once he was gone, so did it too
His rule is known as "nader shahee" equated with loot or looting in addition to the murder of thousands of people in Delhi.
An apt way to put it. He is like Timur, in this sense. Timur caused the Ottoman Interregnum, puppeteered Turco-Mongol Khans, and destabilized the Tughlaq dynasty in India. Nader did basically the same thing, but in the early-modern age.
As for his religion, his official espousal of a heretical sect is condemnable enough. But it's possible he was an atheist.
This is similar to what to timur did
just like timur. these two guys were curse on muslims and islam.
hey I really enjoy all you good stuff. watching your channel so some time now. why don't you make longer documentries like for 1 hour. do they get less view or what
I read book about him. It describes how Persia was constantly financially broke because he needed the money to fund his armies. So he used his armies to raid neighbours. His Indian “conquest” was nothing more than raid.
He was a constant thorn to the Ottomans. Defeating them several times. He “innovated” a special type of mobile artillery. Camels had small cannons strapped to them. Like a medieval Toyota with a .50Cal gun.
The biggest what if was when he nearly went to battle against the Russians. The Russian had a Prussian style army and doctrine. It would have been interesting how his tactics would do well against Prussian military doctrine.
Sir , there is nothing called Persia , this name was used for the first time during pahlavi dynasty about 60 years ago , he wanted to claim Iran as an Persian country but it ended with a bloody revolution , Safavids were Kurdish , Afsharyds were Kurdish , Zands were lure , Qajars were Azeri , Pahlavi was Persian , it's a disrespect to call iran Persia
@@personalmobile9421. 😂 safawids and afshars were not kurdish ignorant, afshar is one of the clans of oghuz
@@refikkartaler2081 I'm one of the Afsharyds family , we live in Khorasan, we still have our Afsharyds unique culture and dances 😂😂😂 internet is a free source , use it honey
@@personalmobile9421 Kurds are Iranians, so jus tell people to say Iranian. My mother is Kurdish from Bukan Iran, and we are fully aware of being Iranians. If you look at those Iranian ethnicities you listed, they all share almost the same genetics.
@@agostocobain2729 but the revolutionaries are saying different , the (Jin Jian Azadi) movement says something else , you are not a Kurd , you are a (Jash)
If you are sure about Kurds to consider themselves as Iranian , then why are they fighting , why they got the republic of Mahabad , or i have a suggestion , why don't your beloved Iran government is not making a voting ???
More than 1500 kurdish people got executed by Iran , yes yes we love Iran 😂😂😂
Edit: I found your other comments , you introduced yourself as an Azeri 😂😂😂 I knew you are not Kurd
Well done!
Napoleon left durable institutions on which modern France was built up, including the Napoleonic Code, the judicial system, the central bank and the country's financial organization, military academies, and a centralized university. What this Naderjan left? What is his legacy? Nothing!!!
Built the worlds strongest army in less than a decade, translated the Bible and other works into Farsi, placed agreements with Ottomans which allowed Iranians to go on pilgrimage to Mecca, regained all of irans lost lands + wasn’t exiled like a wuss on a cozy island 🏝️😂 all whilst being a nobody shepherd and Napoleon grew up in nobility and all the military training in the world
He left a strong iran, identity and jurisprudence
@@reeyees50 You have to prove it bro! What was the identity before then? What did jurisprudence look like in Safavid dynasty? How did Nader change it? Why did Nader change it? Based on what you think this legacy still exists? What made this legacy survive ?
IRAN is the legacy of Nader. If not for him, I don't think Iran would ever have been reunited again.
@@reziinho1414 Did this "strongest nomadic army" could take any Ottoman city? Booooom! Bingoooo! hahaha Napoleon changed the course of history, dude! Nader just regained former Safavid land! Another bingo ahahaha
Legend has it that his subordinates assassinated him because they suspected him of having a secret alliance with the enemies of Islam. The British Empire (in India), Russian Empire (in north), & Austrian Empire (against Ottomans) greatly benefited from Nader's wars and raids.
Some speculate that Nader was an atheist himself. But regardless of personal belief, Shia states have a history of antagonizing the Sunnis around them. The Fatimids, Safavids and even the Khomeinis are guilty of this too.
Thank you for this video! The long wait for a video on Persia’s Alexander is finally over. And that too 38 minutes long! Quite a treat, Hikma! ❤️
Interesting discovery. Glad youtube directed me to this.
Awesome thanks
It was an absolute pleasure to prepare the first draft of the script for this video. I see how you have improved on it to fit a video format better.
Hi Everyone, I'm a historian of the early modern Turco-Persianate world at St Andrews University in Scotland, and I had the pleasure of meeting Hikma all the way back during my PhD. I'm doing my best to bring the research we do in academia to a wider audience through platforms such as CZcams, and this is part of that. I am currently working to get my research monograph on post-Safavid and Naderid Iran published with a university press, and I am curious to see what kind of topics you find interesting on this subject (Iranian imperial identity? Nader's military reforms? the structure of his empire? his claims to the legacy of Timur? his religious reforms to unify Shia and Sunni?).
-Amir
it would be great if you could prepare a video about the relationship between iranian dynasties and turkmen subjects since the latter was main part of rebellious groups and the core part of imperial army. as far as I know all of irans turkic dynasties used Turkmen to found their empire but then all those dynasties had to fight against turkmen at some point.
@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503they weren’t turkic though but usually mixed and Persianized, making them Persian
Great point!@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503
The pleasure was all mine Parsa, thank you again for your invaluable help!
It would be interesting to see new findings about the legitimacy issue of Nodir. Obviously, Nodir was quite a weak figure in terms of legitimate power. Therefore, it would be interesting to research to understand to what extent Nodir's legitimacy was weak and what was Nodir's vision on establishing his legitimacy to rule
On of great shah of iran we love nader and now we need somebody like nadir shah
loved the artwork you dug up!
Hikma is wrong he didnt sought to unify the islamic caliphate. Nor did he lean toward any sides like sunni or shia. He had an agnostic view about islam. He just used islam to gain his political views just like timur did. Nader shah had secular views.
Perfect, Thank you so much 👌👌👌❤
Nader shah 💚 🤍☀️ 🦁🤍❤
Turkic Leader ❤
@@Afshar1 so what???
Nader iran zamin?
@@Afshar1 he wasnt a turkic mongol
@@persianguy1524 🤣
@@Afshar1 you say he was turk I say he was the leader of Iran and he was Iranian you love him I love him both are right .
You could make a 10 season long series out of his life
Was waiting for this Thank you. Mahmoud of Ghazni will be a great topic too
Decent shout!
Wonderful 😂❤ very informative 👏
Thanks ❤ good luck best wishes cyrus London 😅
Please make a video about Emir Khattab ❤
This channel is great!
Thank you!
Praise be to Nader, the Lion in wolves' clothing who claimed Farr through sheer might and force of will alone, and made Eranshahr the mightiest military in the world for the third time in her glorious history.
It's a shame he wasn't much of a ruler and politician though. Kaddi to the core, in all the good and bad ways. Should've still been Shahanshah given the fact that there were no other competent alternatives at the time, but definitely should've left all the mundane affairs of ruling to a competent vizier, just like all the other decent cold hearted brute kings did throughout history.
Based Persian napoleon
epic video, realy enjoyed it.
Glad to hear it!
Well made!
This one’s a banger
Great documentary as always!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Such an informative video. Hugely grateful!
Glad you enjoyed it!
this seems like it will be interesting!
What ya think?
I enjoyed it, interesting topic about something I'd never hear about otherwise.@@HikmaHistory
19:48 Majority of the inhabitants of Hindustan , as the name suggests, are Hindus.
During Mughal rule, Muslims formed around 10-20 % of the population.
Due to uneven birth rates ( Muslim birth rate being higher) and subsequent conversions, the proportion of Muslim population did increase. But even now in 2024, Muslims form only around 1/3rd of population of the subcontinent.
• Total population of the subcontinent = 1.4 billion (India) + 250 million (Pakistan) + 186 million (Bangladesh) = 1.836 billion
• Total Muslim population = 220 million (India) + 240 million (Pakistan) + 170 million (Bangladesh) = 630 million
Now, we calculate the percentage:
approx 34.3 %
This is a good video. Let me show you how to make it great. :)
🪑
Dude, joking aside (you know I always have to be mean), this is a really good video. I'm legit cancelling my video on Nader Shah because of this. Amazing work!
Haha thanks man, spent a whole bunch of time on it. If I had some more time, I could've made it better.
Why you guys stopped doing livestream collaboration...? 😢
When people say Tiumr is underrated what they really mean is Nader Shah is.
There was no Afghanistan during that period so when you were using the word Afghanistan or Afghans during the video, were you referring to a tribe of people or A country that didn't exist yet??
Guy has a clear islamic and anti aryan bias.
Read جهانگشای نادری by Nader's own secretary. He refers to the Pashtun tribes as Afghans (افاغنه) and to their habitat as Afghanistan.
He’s referring to pashtuns
Love Nader.
Nader the great ❤
Great substance and presentation❤❤❤❤
Thank you very much!
Did you speak about atrocities he bought upon Delhi and hindus
He won't ever admit that 😂
No one said he was a merciful ruler 💀
He was king of iran not India
@@reziinho1414 india has seen many unmerciful Muslim rulers
@@mohamda5155 islam is about violence that's the truth no one wants to admit
Ambition is a very good thing.... Born as a peseant die as a king..... wow.
Napoleon the European Nader.
HIKMA HISTORY! Why did you skip the part with Tamerlane's curse?????
in 1740, Nader stole the gravestone of Tamerlane because he idolized Timurids. The next morning Iran woke up from a terrible devastating earthquake, then uprising in Dagestan, then Nader blinded his own son. Shocked by this consequence of events, Naderjan immediately brought the gravestone back to Guri Emir mausoleum.
😂😂😂 He stole it because Tamoor the Lame desecrated Ferdowsi’s tomb
@@reziinho1414 this story has no historical basis behind it. As far as I know, there is no evidence to suggest that Timur ever even visited this person's tomb. Or even mentioned about such person. Just bullshit!
@@reziinho1414 Nader's love for Tamerlane cost him his own life and demise of his kingdom!
They trolled each other
In this poem, Nader Shah says that he will devastate Iran in response to the popular uprisings that broke out while he was in India:
''No other response is possible
Than what is refected in the mirror of my soul.
To quell the uprisings in every direction
I will send forth armies,
Storm with apocalyptic swarms,
And eradicate all peace from that land.
I will shadow my troops,
And reduce Iran to dust''
Mohammad ‘Ali Tusi (Ferdowsi-e Thani), Shahnameh-ye Naderi, ed. Ahmad Sohayli Khwansari, Tehran: Anjoman Athar-e Melli, no. 36, 1339/1960, 212 (vv. 4988-91)
You need to cover EVERY Muslim Sultans of India from Delhi Sultanate to Mughals
may i ask for the source of the artworks in the video? i find them extremely inspiring
Nadir shah was the the last asian conqueror and he was oghuz turk from avshar tribe
Central asia is the part of Iran.
he is true Napoleon of Iran 👑🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷👑
Persian napoleon
About the Turkic origin of Nader Shah Afshar and the Afsharid dynasty:
"Born in November 1688 into a humble pastoral family, then at its winter camp in Darra Gaz in the mountains north of Mashad, Nāder belonged to a group of the Qirqlu branch of the Afšār Turkmen. Beginning in the 16th century, the Safavids had settled groups of Afšārs in northern Khorasan to defend Mashad against Uzbek incursions."
"Nāder's focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder's coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moğān steppe a quriltäy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a "Turkmen" ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word "Turkmen" to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Gozz tribes, but to Timur's descendants as well."
- Encyclopædia Iranica, Nāder Shah
@@theheroickhan “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure the shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
@@theheroickhannader shah literally mocked torks
@@persianguy1524Sources ?
Nader Shah called Iran "the hereditary possession of the noble people of the Turkmans"
Nader was a super intelligent leader, a man who was raised in the army his whole life, and who conquered most places with sheer intelligence. He really modernized the Persian army. Although you did a fantastic job adding multiple paintings throughout the video, I wished you would have added some real photos from his tomb and his guns and uniform as well. Overall, a fantastic video, and thank you so much.
Most of his army was turkic not persian
Here's the corrected version:
"Dude, Iran is always Iran. People who live on the Iranian plateau are called Iranians. Don't associate the great people of Iran with your ethnicity. If you want to praise Turks, find someone in Turkey.. @@Afshar1
@@foadooo He made army from Azerbaijan, Central Asia, Afghanistan and other lands, not only iran. Afsharids were a turkic empire, not iranian
What? Are you cool, bro? Firstly, last time I checked, Iran has two Azerbaijan provinces! Go check it out, bro. Then, for your information, all those places that you are mentioning (Central Asia, Afghanistan, and Azerbaijan as of now, assuming you're from there!) were part of the Safavid and then Afsharid Empires. Nader was a Shia leader who conquered many places. Also, for your information, he defeated the Ottoman Empire (Turkey-your beloved ethnicity, which I assume you're very proud of) under Topal Pasha in the Battle of Kirkuk. (Link here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topal_Osman_Pasha) And you're saying that the Afsharid Empire was Turkic? What are you talking about? We never had a Turkic empire; we never had such a thing. Please educate yourself, and instead of talking about divisive ethnic standpoints, learn some history......@@Afshar1
@@foadooo there's many turkic empires which fought with each other, so your words has no matter. Safavid, Afsharid and Qajars is turkic empires, i have a lot of sources about it.
Why wrongly pronouncing Turkish and Persian names in Arabic accent ??????
He’s Afghan & his pronunciation is different than others.
@@kabdul9208 he speaks english but his pronunciation of the Ottoman names are wrong.
It's funny how this guy wants to larp as arab as much as possible, every islamist is like that
Epic!
Lol, Ottoman and Persian names have nothing to do with your wrong pronounciation !!! Their names aren't what you call.
Excellent
why is Ahmed Shah Durrani not called as the 'Last Asiatic conqueror'?
His empire was only slightly smaller than Nader and he also attacked and won against 3 civilizations. Persia, Steppes and India @Hikma History
Nader the Great became king from nothing and defeated the Ottomans, Russia and India, Ahmed stole part of Nader's wealth and attacked India, which was in ruins.
@@Poiyti Good answer
@@literallynothinghere9089😂
But ultimately Sikhs captured Peshawar 🗿 🇮🇳
Pashtun Biggest City
@@user-yh8xg4ny5y Marathas were defeated though
@@literallynothinghere9089 Marathas only faced a temporary setback at Panipat in 1761. Just 10 years later in 1771 Marathas recaptured Delhi & Panipat from the Rohillas to recover their power back over North India. 2nd Anglo-Maratha War 1803 was the real knockout punch from which the Marathas never recovered again
Throughout our history, We consistently lose to traitors from our own ranks! Nader the great.
Asian Napoleon? Napoleon was european Nader Shah.
Mahmod hotak was no less. He conquered so much with so little.
Academic Minorsky describes his native language as "Turkish of Azerbaijan." He wrote letters to Ottoman Vizier Hakimzade and Muhammed Shah of Moghols in Azerbaijani turkic. Abraham III of Armenia (Kretatsi), the Catolicos met and stayed with Nadir Shah and quoted him in his book in armenian alphabet. Those quotes are indistinguishable from modern-day Azerbaijani.
He didnt look torkic
Plus shah is a Persian title.
nader was Persianized and named his children after figures in shahname
Nader shahs capital was also Persian isfahan
@Techtalk2030 , who made Isfahan capital?
Conquerer ❌ Dacoit ✅
Considering the dates, rather than Nader being "the Napoleon of Asia", one should say that Napoleon was "the Nader of Europe", right?
😂😂🤌🤌👌
At least one of those pictures was from the late 1800s
The fact that Taliban foaming in the mouth ,dreaming about capturing Tehran while seeing them selves as modern incarnation of Hotak fighting shia Rafezi is disturbing. Listening to the majority of Taliban leadership and hearing about delusions/dreams, make this episode way more terrifying( at least for me ).
They should be praying that the Afshar empire should not be reincarnated then lol
چی میگی کصخل
If true, based Afghans. Iran and its proxies has been a curse for the modern Middle East. Just ask the refugees.
@@Qoral-ef5rz
Was it Iran or Shia Islamists.Iran has faced two massive uprising in the last four years and Islamists survived barely each time.if the progressive forces overthrew the Islamists,given the experience with Islamism,Iran is going to be the most secular state in the world even more secular than French lacite. Every opposition parties from far left to center right is talking ,and has planned for years to deislamisize Iran in every aspect Icluding: Society, culture, economy and politics. So CHILL!
who cares about what some leftists dream. even the progressives won iran cant be more secular than turkish. you can try but you would fail just like others before you had failed. sociology of the given culture should be well understood before claiming such bullshit. @@Ramtin-Blue_rose
دا واقعا د افسوس ځای دی چې افغانان د خپل ځلانده تاریخ سره داسې هېروي
I never heard anyone call nader asian napoleon, indian napoleaon is emperor samudragupta, but nader did not conquer or expand his territories, he just sacked and left...even his neighbouring afghanistan was independent under duraanis
your knowledge on history is really weak. durranis were formed by his general ahmed shah abdali (later durrani) after nader had been assasinated.
@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503 yes but duraani family was already powerful and nader did not annex their territory...
he didnt need to annex it. he just wanted their submission@@mrperfect-mh4qm
@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503 submission through warfare is not real submission
tell me when you found real submission of a state into another state@@mrperfect-mh4qm
Actually Napeleon is europian Nader
Pls don't Glorify him - he was cause of Multiple massacres in present day Pakistan and Northern India. Rivers of blood Flew when he attacked Civilians in Delhi. Later his Pupil Ahmad Shah Abdali Invaded Punjab and north India 14 times for loot and massacre
Exactly. Then don't glorify temujin, timur, alexander, muhammad, richard the lionheart etc. etc. etc.
Otherwise you'll just keep making the same mistakes.
Ahmad Shah Abdali was a traitorous fool, but Nader Kabir was a legend, I am an Iranian and I love Indians, please investigate why Nader Shah ordered to kill in Delhi, Indians wanted to kill him and kill 1000 Iranians. Iranians don't kill for no reason, no Iranian king has ever done this, you can research the justice of Cyrus the Great, Nadir Kabir was not a monster either.
@@Poiytiyou are living in your own dream bubble. If Indian wants to kill persian then we don't gave shelter to persian communities in earlier times. Indians Don't went to Iran, he came over India. That coward mughal surrendered over him.
@@yaqubebased1961we don't glorify them.
19:10 so No indonesia , Malaysia or Islamic parts of sub-Saharan Africa ?
one of the great Turkmen rulers of Iran.
There was nothing turkic about him. He looked Iranian and Persian not turkic mongol
@@persianguy1524About the Turkic origin of Nader Shah Afshar and the Afsharid dynasty:
"Born in November 1688 into a humble pastoral family, then at its winter camp in Darra Gaz in the mountains north of Mashad, Nāder belonged to a group of the Qirqlu branch of the Afšār Turkmen. Beginning in the 16th century, the Safavids had settled groups of Afšārs in northern Khorasan to defend Mashad against Uzbek incursions."
"Nāder's focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder's coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moğān steppe a quriltäy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a "Turkmen" ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word "Turkmen" to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Gozz tribes, but to Timur's descendants as well."
- Encyclopædia Iranica, Nāder Shah
@@theheroickhan “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
@@persianguy1524 What does iranian look like? and What does Persian look like? What anatomical features make someone look like as iraqian and parsian?
oh come onnnnnn dont rewrite history. all he did was for turks, his tribe is turkic, everything about him is known to everyone.@@persianguy1524
He was a great king.
I visited his grave.
Persian king ❤❤❤❤
🇮🇷 💪
Turkic*
@@civilization23 ?
@@Afshar1
Turks are Persians who were attacked by Mongols
During the Achaemenid period, Türkiye belonged to the land of Persia
You can search in Google
@@Afshar1about his tribe there is conflicts some groups say he was kurd and other say he was azari but the thing is important he was shah of iran as he claimed himself as shah of iran not turk not arabs not afghans he was shah of iran
Now that’s a great timing!!A week ago I was reading about Nader Shah’s glorious conquests in Mughal India😊
this is a very interesting video. I think though the last great Asian conqueror is maybe Ibn Saud, who conquered most of Arabia after starting out as a refugee in Kuwait and then seizing Riad, or possibly Mao, who conquered China. Nader Shah conquered a bigger land mass than Ibn Saud but he was still a mghty conqueror
I’d say it’s Maharaja Ranjit Singh who took over India Pakistan and Afghanistan while the Sikh were less then 1% of the population they ruled over
@@Dinosauruss1 Ibn Saud was the 20th century though
@@krisinsaigon that’s impressive
@@Dinosauruss1 he never took over Afghanistan or the tribal areas of pak....
Turkic warrior ❤
He wasnt turkic. A turkic looks like the guy in your picture, not him who looked Persian.
“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure the shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"
@@persianguy1524 Besides territorial integrity, two alternative concepts of sovereignty to replace the crumbling dynastic ideal can be discerned in Nadir Shah's negotiations with the Ottomans in the 1730s. Nadir proposed equal relations based, first, on Ottoman recognition of the legitimacy of Twelver Shiism as a fifth school of orthodox Islamic law. And second, he proposed something akin to an ethnic or national concept - equal relations based on Nadir Shah's identity as a member of the noble Turkmen family of peoples."
Howard, D. (2017). A History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.192
To justify his stance and claim a common heritage with the Ottomans, he invoked the history of Chinggis Khan: In the time of Chingiz Khan, the leaders of the Turkman tribes, who had left the land of Turan and migrated to Iran and Anatolia, were said to be all of one stock and one lineage. At that time, the exalted ancestor of the dynasty of the ever-increasing state [the Ottoman Empire] headed to Anatolia and our ancestor settled in the provinces of Iran. Since these lineages are interwoven and interconnected, it is hoped that when his royal highness learns of them, he will give royal consent to the establishment of peace between [us]. In a letter presented to the Ottomans after his assumption of the title of shah in 1736 Nadir claimed legitimacy simply as a Turk, stating that “kingship is the ancestral right of the exalted Turkmen tribe.” Thus the rulers of the regional states - the Chinggisid khans of Khiva, the Timurid/Chinggisid Mughals, the Ottomans, and Nadir himself, all had equal legitimacy.
Furthermore, in a deliberate attempt to reverse the abandonment of the glorification of Genghis-Khanid descent as a ''branch of the tree of unbelief'' by Ismacil, Nadir tried to revive the pre-Safavid Turkman tribal principles of legitimacy, which had not been given currency since the fifteenth century. In a letter to the Ottoman grand vizier, Nadir states that the dignitaries of Iran gathered in the plain of Mughan "elected our august Majesty to kingship and sovereignty which are the hereditary prerogatives of the noble Turkman tribe." Mulla cAli Akbar, his Mulla-bashi, opens his pan-Islamic sermon in Kufah with the eulogy of Nadir not only as the shadow of God on earth, but also as the scion of the Turkman tree and heir to Genghis Khan. However, after Nadir's death, Safavid descent, often with a marked emphasis on its religious character, remained the most viable ground of legitimacy for rulership.
Expectation of the Millennium : Shiìsm in History Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. State University of New York Press pp.194
@@persianguy1524 Despite his obscure background, he looked born for the throne. Nature endowed him with all the great qualities that make heroes ... His dyed beard made a sharp contrast with his completely gray hair; his natural physique was strong, tall, and his waist was proportional to his growth; his expression was gloomy, with an oblong face, an aquiline nose and a beautiful mouth, but with his lower lip protruding forward. He had small penetrating eyes with a sharp and piercing gaze; his voice was rude and loud, although he knew how to soften it on occasion, as required by personal interest...
Dalrymple, William; Anand, Anita (2017). Koh-i-Noor: The History of the World's Most Infamous Diamond. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 48-60.
Sounds Turkic 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@persianguy1524 most of yours looks similar to Indians but still Claims to be Indo European ☕️☕️☕️
There's nothing we can do...
He was from the Afshar Tribe of modern day Turkmenistan
I wonder how many "turkmens" have done ancestry tests 🤭
Afshars were part of the Qizilbash, and many of them still do refer to themselves as such. They were Turks of Azerbaijan, not Turkmenistan. Afshars are still a living clan in Iran (although almost nothing remains of their clan unity today except a surname).
I've never heard of Afshars in Turkmenistan of all places 🤔
@@lambert801 Azeris are even more iranian than most other "turks", in most cases. Am one myself btw, so can't bs me into thinking otherwise
Found the butthurt fars@@yaqubebased1961
@@yaqubebased1961 what is the definition of "being more iranian" ?
Shahanshah of world
The true Napoleon of 🇮🇷