NASA Artemis 2 moon rocket's core stage engines installed in 4K time-lapse
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 11. 2023
- Artemis 2's Space Launch System rocket core stage was fitted with 4 RS-25 engines recently at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans.
Footage courtes: NASA/Evan Deroche/Steven Seipel/Eric Bordelon
Time-lapsed by Space.com's Steve Spaleta ( / stevespaleta )
Music: All Parts Equal by Airae / courtesy of www.epidemicsound.com - Věda a technologie
Such beautiful engines (my favorite ones)
I hope people really appreciate how much hard work goes into this!
Engines are installed now to install the boots and get the core to The Cape.
Amazing precision on gigantic scale!!❤❤
Love geeking out on this process.
Lovely video! More please! Engine assembly, tank fabrication etc etc...
❤❤❤ !!! Love it big time !! Well done! All the best / Jk
Wish it could all get done that fast!
That's one big booster !
Such beautiful engines. Too, bad that they will only be used once and discarded, as long as SLS launches.
Exactly
It’s like watching artists get to work.
Imagine wanting to build a rocket that's going to fly into space, but instead you end up getting a job working on something that you know is just going to fail at everything it is supposed to do.
I'm convinced that if everyone listened to the naysayers. We would still be living in the dark ages.
And if more people didn't listen to naysayers. Humans would probably be traveling outside the solar system by now.
Funny that the first flew perfectly with no in flight issues.
@@MillaMilla7 $90 BILLION!! Almost 20 years! Using old parts from the dumpster, relying on companies that make up insane prices and timelines... and still cant deliver. It took less than 8 years to get to the moon, but now its like... really challenging n stuff.
@@stokesseegers5012 It hasn't cost anywhere near that much to develop, let alone fly each rocket.
The program was authorized by Congress 12 years ago and had a practically perfect first launch last year, so yes it very much can deliver, even if took a lot of work to get to this point.
The rocket you see in this video is for the second flight, which will launch astronauts beyond Earth orbit and around the Moon and back for the first time in 50 years.
@@brokensoap1717 no. You're wrong.
Sem palavras
🌚
Still amuses me that there are people out there that think all this time, money & effort is wasted just for show... as NASA will wind up just showing us a CGI video of rocket launches & space travel instead 😅
This is not time lapse
L'unica domanda da fare ai complottisti è la seguente: " Perchè non consultare un buon terapista ?
hypergolic with no fire ? 🤣🤣🤣
no and no. these use liquid hydrogen and oxygen. and hypergolics have fire.. but some hypergolics, as with h2 and lox, burns clear.
Так я непонял всех евреев поймали или нужен шатл!?!(
Beautiful and wasteful at the same time. Those engines are designed to master many launches. Instead, they are wasted on the first run.
USA the best.
you don't get much for your $2,000,000,000.00.
Its crazy how they go through all this effort of building rockets…just to end up faking space exploration with cgi
LOOOOOOOL nice one got me
Unfunny, ancient "joke"...
@@RocketPal
Or could it be… Ancient Aliens! 👽😹
$100+ Million per engine is kinda wasteful. Design a new engine please. Or, at minimum, don't freak out and turn bitter if we enjoy the private industry more than a $4 billion expendable rocket. Chill. Thanks.
Right? We can design rockets but can’t fix road infrastructure or install high speed rail?
Ehh it's more like 20 mill an engine
you know what's wasteful? Spending close to 1 trillion for military PER YEAR. When all this money still can't ensure peace on this planet by defeating (or letting others defeat) a couple of states with maniacs in power who threaten the very existence of our civilisation with all our plans to expand into space...
*Design a new engine please*
Design one better and cheaper kiddo, what is stopping you... oh wait is it lack of education?
The rocket doesn't cost 4 billion for every flight, not even if you factor in fixed costs spread over a low flight rate.
The unit cost of the new engines they are building is not nearly as much, with cost savings due to modern manufacturing and a simplified production process.
Nothing wrong with expendable rockets.
Personally I'm more excited about what this rocket can do and will be able to do in future upgrades than any private launch vehicle development, NASA ftw.