How was the Artemis 1 moon rocket assembled? Behind the scenes look
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 08. 2022
- In the first episode of NASA series "Artemis I Path to the Pad," the Space Launch System rocket takes center stage. See what it took to put all its components together. Artemis 1 mission - Live updates: www.space.com/news/live/nasa-...
Credit: NASA
Writer: Danielle Sempsrott
Editor: Francisco Martin
Producers: John Sackman, Michael Justice & Madison Tuttle
Music courtesy of Gothic Storm Music - Věda a technologie
Amazing !
Awesome stuff!... I look forward to it... a new era! 🚀
@Science Revolution I think you need help... are you a Flat Earther🗺️ or a "Christian"? 🙏🤔
Awesome video
Go Go Nasa.. 👍🔥🔥 😍Beautiful view.. MashaAllah
Would like to see a launch in person someday/year.
@Science Revolution Wow, you are delusional. Have you ever heard of satellite TV? You aim your satellite dish at the satellites location over the equator and you can pick up satellite TV channels from other countries. I had a C-Band dish in the 1990 here in Canada and could pick up channels from the U.S. and Mexico.
You can also get a satellite phone, which will work anywhere on Earth, far from any cell phone towers.
Get out of the city where the sky is dark. You can see satellites with your own eyes after sunset or before sunrise, while they are lit up by the sun, but the sky is dark. The easiest to see is the ISS. Go to spot the station website and input your location. It will tell you when and what angle to see it.
Yes, the ISS needs to boost itself to a higher orbit due to atmospheric drag. That affects all low Earth orbit satellites. That is why they eventually fall back to Earth. As did Skylab in the 70s and as happens to all low Earth orbit satellites eventually. The ones in geostationary orbit, don't have that problem, since they are much higher.
The duration of the rocket's engine burn determines it's velocity. Once it is up to orbital velocity, it will continue in orbit for years.
Weapons in space are not practical. It is better to have them on the ground. A weapon in orbit, could only hit a target that the orbit is over at a given time. An orbit directly over the equator could only hit targets on the equator.
Maybe study some real science and physics instead of conspiracy nutters.
Yeah I am really looking forward to the lunch nervous over its performance. But hoping for a flawless performance
The clip with the 2 SW1500s must be an old one because they sold their 3 EMD switchers a few years ago.
why did you repost nasas video as your own??
It's no longer the most powerful rock the world has ever seen
I've got a tractor pull competition next month....now hear me out...
15 days left...
The better question is did they just build one??? I would imagine they would have to have at least 4. I mean it took like 40 years to get to this point why would they just build one???
They haven't stopped building them. The SLS components for Artemis 2 are in the final stages of construction, and components for Artemis 3 and Artemis 4 are also being manufactured as we speak.
Oh my gosh, I came here to watch a video about rockets but now I'm going to invest everything in crypto. If only the bank wasn't closed on Sunday, I need to withdraw everything and give it to this crypto trader right away! 😏
Really? Where do I sign up? Do you know of a good trader that can scam me out of my life saving?. 😂
Do you think they will land in 2 years? Impossible, it's a short time. More than one scientist said, WE WILL HAVE THE BEST COMPUTERS, THE BEST TELEMETRY EQUIPMENT, ETC. The difference is only that, the issue is transportation, the rocket, the engines, they are the ones that distance us from the Earth's gravity.
Not a chance. The SLS needs to be scrapped and the money given to programs that have shown that they actually work.
Do they still use Russian engines?
No. It has the same engines as the space shuttle.
SLS never has or never was going to use Russian RD-180's. In fact no U.S. flown rocket uses any Russian engines at all after Delta. SLS uses RS-25 space shuttle ME.
This albatross may NEVER get off the ground, let alone reach the moon. Elon or bust.
Oh dear.
الصرف
first
I can Calculate
Enginee
Horse power if
NASA
Send me
Data
1:38 What is he wearing? Some kind of crazy pacemaker or personal oxygen tank? Or is it just like a fanny pack? Lol.
🤓
My guess is that the SLS will get about 5 miles downrange and then explode in a HUGE fireball.
I doubt that will happen. It has already run through its 8 minutes and 20 second static fire test. The SRBs are just an upgrade of the ones on the shuttle.
The only reason that the Challenger exploded was due to launching when it was too cold. That is unlikely to be the case in August or September when it launches.
@@my3dviews But it would take care of the problem once and for all, no more money wasted on SLS.
@@TheJimtanker Or, it would result in them making changes that would end up costing even more. It is a test flight after all. Its purpose is to make sure it all works in flight. A failure does not necessarily mean it would be cancelled. Plus, cancelling contracts is not free either.
There is also no guarantee that SpaceX's Starship will work. Until it makes an orbital flight and landing, SLS will not be cancelled.
@@my3dviews At the very least it would set them back at least two more years and hopefully Congress would come to their senses and realize what a waste of money it is chasing this paper tiger and obsolete technology.
imagine being an “expert” and still wearing a mask….
Why are the respondents in front of camera wearing masks ?
Kudos to people who wear safety and healthy masks. If only more people are as smart as them.
Governmental requirements, hazardous materials, clean rooms, general hygiene. Could be anything really.
They're embarrassed to show their faces,due to the fact that everyone is acting like this system is something super new and modern. The main engines are shuttle main engines,using 4 instead of three,and those are the exact same solid rocket boosters as the shuttle used,with I think ,2 more motor segments.
@@tomcline5631 that’s… kinda the whole point of the program. It was marketed as a cheaper rocket, because it would be using legacy hardware. (Haha, if only…) not only that, but this is something every rocket does. Redstone used missile tech, Apollo used redstone, shuttle used Apollo, and now sls uses all of them.
@@tomcline5631 , tried and true systems, still excellent and still engineering marvels. It is brand new, just like Boeing's 747-8 is flying the same skies as the Airbus A380s.