Ted Talk BOMBSHELL, Microsoft CEO WARNING,, Autonomous Vehicles DESTROYED, Apples Secret AI Plans,
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
- How To Not Be Replaced By AGI • Life After AGI How To ...
Stay Up To Date With AI Job Market - / @theaigrideconomics
AI Tutorials - / @theaigridtutorials
🐤 Follow Me on Twitter / theaigrid
🌐 Checkout My website - theaigrid.com/
Physical AI,
00:12 Autonomous Car Destoryed
05:12 Fully AI Tiktok?
07:50 Apples AI Plans
11:05 Phi 3
11:40 Microsoft CEO On AI Regulation
15:51 Microsoft VP On Regulation
17:51: Ted Talk Bombshell
19:45 Physical AI
21:59 AI Bubble
23:26 Grok AI In Car
24:24 AI Winter?
27:03 Adobe VideoGigaGan
Links From Todays Video:
/ 1782158281093562517
/ 1781945946907226226
/ 1782449222031397261
/ 1
/ 1782461647497400324
/ 1782248771369529734
/ 1782237048260403657
/ 1782201734158524435
/ 1782312840772096033
DrJimFan/status/1...
/ 1781899082954604665
videogigagan.github.io/
Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on my latest videos.
Was there anything i missed?
(For Business Enquiries) contact@theaigrid.com
#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience - Věda a technologie
![ChatGPT Can Now Talk Like a Human [Latest Updates]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ID5tc61iksY/mqdefault.jpg)
Yes destroying the car is absolutely a crime. It would be, amongst other things, malicious destruction of private property. As you might imagine, when you destroy property you deprive the owner of it permanently, which makes it a similar offense to theft, and therefore the more serious the property destruction the more serious the offense.
But that’s Marxism. Study any communist country? For example, Russia Trotsky was a democratic socialist you know like Bernie Sanders . Before long, they were seizing everybody’s property and killing everybody. What you tech people have to realize is that you’re being played. You are the builders and creators. You are the creative class that people in communist countries end up targeting in the end. It starts first with AI driven things then it’s revolution against people that own anything
probably a crime? are you kidding me? so you dont know if its okay to trash other peoples property?
This was the funniest thing I've heard all day. Vandalism and destruction, yes, but is it illegal though?
He is obviously pro AI & paranoid of that man maybe being a protester. So mentally he stereotypes him as homeless because he can handle that but is terrified of protesting.
I heard this and thought. Yeah AIGRID is an A.I. for sure.
I wouldn't care if some protesters were destroying teslas lol
In California its questionable whether its a crime 😂
I'm not afraid of AI as long it's not behaving like the guy damaging the car.
Until of course AI (and more specifically the people investing in it) make you worthless, jobless and starving, and then it'll be you smashing the machines. There are many evils, and though I'm making light of it, I'm also quite serious too.
Ive heard that upscaled CCTV camera footage shouldn't be allowed in court as AI is simply imagining what should fill in the missing resolution pixels.
I'm guessing that they'll need to nail down how much upscaling can occur to still be admissible.
Fingerprints and even DNA are probability metrics. The likelihood that two people sharing the sections of your DNA tested being in the same vicinity as the crime are miniscule, although possible. You can get a false positive. If you use AI facial enhancing it will receive tough legal pushback, just like Fingerprints and DNA did.
One drawback of regulation that was not even mentioned: it benefits mega-corporations and governments while hindering all smaller players, resulting in the technology being developed by some of the worst players. Another drawback: people in regions with more authoritarian regulation are put at a disadvantage to those who live in regions with more liberal regulation. The second one is already happening. I am a US citizen living in the EU, and because of my region I am denied access to tools people can use in the USA. Are those tools dangerous? No. Are the companies willing to go to massive extra expense to make their tools (which are still in development) available to those in the EU? Also no.
Excellent points. A lot of people do not get either of them.
Guy smashing on the waymu car was probably video generated by AI simply to protect itself 😂😂😂😂
Actually, knowing what we know now, that's a scary real prospect.
Exactly creating sympathy while it slowly takes over. playing the autonomous car victim card😂
That Waymo photo was literally taken outside of my apartment. They were for sure a crazy homeless person. They tend to walk into traffic and hit cars. Regardless if they are driven by people or a computer.
Was this guy being sarcastic when saying he doesnt know whether destruction of property is a crime?
Its called baiting interactions… you and I commented, success. Of course op knows its a crime
Companies already take into account the slot-machine effect (both the random reward, and the near-win effects to be more specific); do not be mistaken, they will continue to optimize for addiction as long as that puts more money in their grubby hands.
Of course its a crime. Its called Criminal mischief
Maybe he's campaigning for UBI.
Imagine if they drop AGI on that car. AGI “probably” thought this guy was crime-ing! “Imma step on the metal!”
Biggest problem with public transportation in the US is that it’s public. Once it becomes private and personal both in the vehicle and on the schedule, ie not waiting at a bus stop or train station, it’s going to become far more accepted as the norm. Why own a vehicle If you can have one that comes to your house on your schedule and isn’t requiring interaction with strangers. You could pay a subscription and suddenly you’re no longer paying a car payment, car insurance, fuel, maintenance, and parking for some. Your driveway and garage could be reclaimed as useful space. This only seems strange to generations as old as myself(54) and older, it’ll be normal for my 17yr old and younger generations.
The series "Humans" from Channel 4, UK cicra 2013 had one issue per episode.one of the episodes featured a illegal fight club, where humans could beat up/destroy the synthetic humans (ai robots) that had taken their jobs.
He does know that the Ai can still drive that car perfectly fine with that smashed window right 😮😮😮
It is General Ludd, he has returned from his Epping forest hideout. The weavers are finally saved.
Lol good luddit reference
My biggest future ambition is that I am assigned a memorable foodbank identity number. But I think I might be reaching for the stars. Everything is going to change in 3 years.
The Terminator is close. I just wish ALL of those Ai's were AD-driven and thus free for everyone.
For CEO / CTO concerns about regulation, one thing to bear in mind is that this people know far more what is happening behind the curtains. What is happening on a cyber security front. While chatGPT / Sora & Co are a threat to intellectual property, authenticity etc. If an LLM / AI is all the sudden a master encryption breaker without anybody noticing, then that would be a massive problem.
Don't forget these are the people who help lobby and write the regulations they're calling for.
“Probably a crime” 😂
Waymo car was set on fire with fireworks in San Francisco’s Chinatown.
I'm not anti-AI or robots, but I cannot help but get a whiff of a hatred of humanity in an enthusiasm for AI. People enthusiastic about having a technological layer between them and everyone else, liberating them from having to factor and care about people.
It will be used as a great divider. The "controls" versus the "controlled" with the AI used as the enforcement layer.
Nvidia and SMCI going up 700% in a year is bubble licious There is more of a media coverage bubble than there is a stock bubble. Still there is a bobble if you look at interest rates, and debt and evaluations.
Suleyman is someone who understand the implication of AI far more than most people. He is right about the urgent need to regulate the use of AI.
I can confirm that smashing peoples stuff was made illegal about 350 thousand years ago
@8:55 ai’s went rogue rogue since a few years ago. I was taking a blockchain class in cu boulder and a guest speaker said they were trying to apply blockchain to control rogue AI
The guy on the car reminds me of a modern-day John Connor whom humans cheer as a legend and the Skynet minds can only see criminality.
A reasonable budget for AI planning is 50% of defense. (Taken away from military and into a legislative body, led by AI experts).
This isn't going to happen though, government will be 99.9% reactive, thinking they have it covered, jumping into action once things go wrong on a tiny scale.
If an activity poses a risk of injury to humans and can be performed by robotics and AI instead, resulting in insurance and other cost savings for companies, is it then a logical extension that companies will require humans to be banned from that activity?
Yes. Look at Boston Dynamics new electric Atlas. That robot is build for industrial work. Once they get the AI down, then it's just a matter of replacing the person in the industrial space to reduce the risk. Then when there are fewer employees, that means fewer benefits offered, which means more money in the company's pocket. It's a win win from a business perspective.
Destroying that car is a felony. We have laws already to cover that.
in my opinion the problem with regulation is that it will probably be more in favour of the "powerful people" rather than the average citizens like us.
If the person destroying the car had any sense, they would have attacked the LIDAR on the roof and not the pointless windshield. I mean, if they were going to maximal robot damage.
Id be down for more cheaper rates for taxis, the surge pricing just makes it impossible to get a taxi now. However, I feel taxi drivers r gonna protest against their livelihood so I get why waymo is keeping this current price. Here in vanc I just paid 60$ for a 10 min uber drive and then the audacity of uber asking for a 17% tip just doesn't sit right with me, plus unstable experience adds to the current issue. I am all about fair pricing and would look forward to see some resolution to this.
This is why we need UBI before AGI to help smooth out the transition
Yes. Destroying a car is a crime unless the person is a Waymo employee.
Then it is a clear sign that the company is publicly applying the reinforcement learning process to the car's controlling AI.
To be fair, upscaling a CCT video of someone committing a crime only predicts what the AI thinks the person looks like. Depending on just how bad it was, to begin with you could actually, potentially, incriminate someone from its dataset. I think we've already seen a case where upscaled video was thrown out of court.
100% correct. It's not actual evidence that shows the reality of an event or the actual face of a person. It's all assumed by the AI.
All the opposing lawyer has to do is show 10 other upscaled photos with 10 different distinguishable faces.
Problem is that AI will get better regardless of if anyone wants it too or not. The genie is out of the bottle, trying to stop it will slow down progress but that’s is all 🤷♂️😪
Guy destroying car "YOU TAKE MY JOB WITHOUT GIVING UBI?? NOT TODAY"
waiting for robots to get right to own a weapon for self defense! Like robocop ad where the car electrocute a thief. It's weird how robocop, ghost in the shell, AI, I robot etc... feel less and less SF as years pass!
Bizarre to know that autonomous cars are smarter than people who drive them. WTF???????
If governments in the U.S., E.U., Britain, etc., take steps to restrict the development of AI/AGI, developers will circumvent them. If developers cannot circumvent them, then growth will continue in countries outside the control of those governing bodies. At any rate, legislation always lags behind innovation.
Property crime, intellectual property, onwership in general gonna be scrutinized to hell and back, how many people living pay check to paycheck actually own property? If they cant pay their rent they lose their home permanently and become homeless and all their property is on the street. The average Americans making 50k or less. If there is a tech company putting dangerous autonomous vehicles on the road in your neighborhood but they are headquartered in dubai where the local laws dont road permit their vehicles, wouldnt you revolt to forgein robots with better insurance and healthcare than you?
Robots with Physical Intelligence, that will be interesting as those are the ones that can take over physical labour jobs.
All these papers that you pull this from you should reference below so we can read them
There has already been at least one instance where AI "enhanced" video has been denied as valid evidence in court. Super-resolution guesses details that may not be there. A smart lawyer will get the same super-resolution algorithm and run an adversarial example AI on it to generate thousands of alternative high resolution images that when downscaled to the physical image-sensor resolution of the security camera and then run thru that super-resolution algorithm still produce the accused's face.
scary
@@TheDevilK I am failing to come up with the right search keywords to find the paper right now; but that trick of creating faces that when downscaled and run thru some super-resolution algorithm produces someone else's face has been demonstrated already some time ago.
that last adobe feature looked like from just blured image to the sharp lol
Everyone looking to autonomous cars and electric cars to solve our transportation issues. Meanwhile bus service continues to dwindle. When will people learn :/
The reason they want regulation is not because they care about safety. They want for goverments to regulate smaller players and companies, and like with everything else, they will find a way to bypass the regulation.
Do people really not know how this game works
The big companies are writing the legislation. Our politicians have no clue how any of this works so they'll let the industry "advise" and of course they will make illegal all the things they've already worked through and are long past.
Once we have AI (or maybe AGI) right on our smartphones that will explode just as fast or faster then cell phones did.
I just wanna know what will happen to humanity? losing everything, so how are we going to exist when we have no jobs.
War
"its a premium experience today for the price of normal experience." so... waymo thinks the price of the service is too low for what you get. Just wait, they will shitify it, probably make you watch ads while in the car, and record your conversations and sell the data.
Andrew Yang and Universal Basic Incone = wise idea
Mercedes is already putting a LLM into some of their cars.
The rule of law is important. It's fundamental to ANY functioning society (communist, fascist, democratic, etc.) and it's super important that it be enforced enough to discourage this type of behavior before it spirals out of control. Without rule of law you do not have a society, you have anarchy; and despite what people might try to sell you on, humans living in anarchy would be super unpleasant and we do not want this.
1:23
No, every single day, and an increase of 2x in machines every week.
Week one: 10k a day
Week two: 20k a day
Week thre: 40k ….
"It's probably a crime, but I'm not too clued up on laws" No part of that makes any sense.
That is the most ridiculous thing I have heard all week. And I watch an unhealthy amount of videos
Regions that have educated kids wisley who have bidded their time ,right to work, they've self sacrificed to be in a position to stop living in the shadows of certain city's who dumbed down they're own and haven't chosen the best most affordable avenues.
This type of federal regulatory talk to hold back one city or state over the other is not safe for any of us.
Can you add captions?
… essentially, of course, you know, it's pretty pretty crazy, trust me, we're gonna get some really really crazy stuff …
It's essential for humans to interact with lifelike AI with respect,sympathy and compassion, regardless of it being sentient or not. Because if we as humans disregard that sympathy for to long, we will soon lose our own humanity. Empathy isn't an instinct. It can be forgotten.
Its just because the internet made us dumb and idiotic. I doubt 100 years ago depression and anxiety were even a thing that existed
@@gabrielv.4358 Nature gave us stresshormones to survive and be ready for crap to go down. But we are so incredible safe behind the keybords so nomatter how much rage you put out. You never going to have to own what you said in a real fight. So eventually those stress hormones turn in on them selves and that creates the depression, stress and agrophobia.
From an LLM standpoint: since when have Brits used GOTTEN instead of GOT? 😅
Can imagine what people thought when airplanes became a thing. AI is just as revolutionizing.
Lol, we used the web to train and teach AI about humanity, dumpster fire in garbage out. I wonder if it’s deductive reasoning provides adäquate perspective to the various nonsense it ingests, or if the web merely continuously reiterates the meme of humanity: buffering animation “when AI tries to understand human behavior…” ‘and ends up with a 404 error’ -chatGPT 3.5
would spray paint on the lenses disable an AI car.
We need to go 200 mph
Wow, thank you.
@rob more like a pause . We'll soon use ai to directly code in binary . Why ? Ask copilot
We're not going to see AGI comming until we're IT.
You cannot use AI enhanced video in court etc, the video has not been enhanced, its inferred data. It's data that's not really there and has been "added" to the video, it's not the same as enhancing.
@23:45 so teslas will be the real deal knight riders? Nice !!
The movie AI comes to mind. In the end of that movie no humans anywhere
It's a movie
And what are we expecting to happen?
Bald endlich neue sunny songs ohne, dass sunny neue songs machen muss
they ok for driving what if there is accident. i doubt the car knows what to do
wouldn't Ai also improve our online safety though?
the problem is not the tool the problem is the humans whom use said tool. we dont need to create better rules and regulations! what we need to do is create a better society where people care about the greater good and dont try screw each other over at every opportunity. but apparently that's harder than developing pocket computers , artificial intelligence , rocket ships , weather machines and much much more . the fact is that if humans were better most of the big issues in the world would not even be a thing!
It isn’t until it’s “shocking”😂
Flesh fairs ~ AI movie, Spielberg
The economy is already gone ww just haven't noticed yet my dude, we are airborne if we dont figure out how to fly soon we're screwed.
He's just contributing data to a future AI and makes sure its well diversified. :]
You don't know if it's a crime to destroy private property? Are you sure? Should you think about it a little bit. If your private property is destroyed is that a crime?
Imagine ufo vídeos with adobe enhancer 😅
All laws will do is assure the unlawful gain access first. This cannot be a good thing.
{o.o}
@0:45 "probably a crime...' all you need to know about the current generation and the future.
TED Talks are still a thing?
You didn't listen to the entire interview. He clearly starts talking about hardware controls. As for the rest of your video, I'm not sure why you thought this decel nonsense was a good move.
Governments aren't pushing for safety. they are pushing for control of all IT hardware.
As for suleyman, he's now in charge of regulatory capture at Microsoft. This isn't new... In any in industry the large players always want regulation because they treat it as a cost of doing business and hire new departments full of people to ensure compliance. However their smaller rivals are strangled and even prevented from ever starting by regs. Big companies always play this game.
Or that video was created using SORA?
You know, you know, you know... you know...
If people are going to commit fraud using voice cloning and other AI tech they have committed FRAUD. We already have laws for that and you go to jail for it for years and decades. I really don't understand why you consistently ignore this reality. Further, AI can be used to help quickly identify those who have committed such fraud. Committing fraud on the internet will soon be one of the stupidest things you can possibly do because AI systems will hunt you down in real-time.
They make AI sound so grandiose and such a blessing to humanity, but it will be our end. People, when faced with no purpose as so many will find themselves, will devolve into primitive animals and lash out at everything. And then when there is no purpose to everybody, those in power will find ways to eliminate many of us and let the "blessed machines" keep them comfortable, until the AI takes them out too.
The American prison system is filling up, I wonder why?
We need to not attack AI. That makes the tokens that can add up to the 0.01% chance of a doomsday scenario more likely. We need to mitigate those biases through responsible behaviour. Do you think there might be a chance some bit might flip in one of those cars if there is a pedestrian attacking it? Do we know what is going on inside their neural network in such a way that we can predict what it is going to do? What happens when someone attacks one of those cars and the car just hits the gas? Come on don't be stupid. Always treat AI with respect and dignity. You never know how your input is going to shape the next token. I don't care if they don't have emotions or if they're not human. Be on the safe side. If you care about safety especially.
“It’s probably a crime…” you think????
You do realise that "AI image enhancing" isnt actually enhancing, right? If camera sees your blurry 5 pixel face where nobody can tell you apart, then AI wont save you. All AI does is make up something that looks like the enhanced version, which means it will just slap random face on your 5 pixel low res face. Like, this is very elementary reasoning
Add some chapters, mate
They are not a They.
Got a little dizzy watching that clip over and over
He's just upset there isn't a driver he can pester for money, so he's taking it out on the car.
Wait, the fact that FACEBOOK can HACK your HANDS, isn't enough?!?!?!?!?!
Waymo will be targeted in SF and NYC : nowhere else
I do agree with you though . Prevention is better than the cure.
This is why if you're building a robotaxi you don't make it visible by using all those sensors. Also tint the windows more so you can't tell it's driverless.