dude...no way older model looks better than previous.....design is spot on, makes old model looking outdated big time....this cx-5 kicks ass visually except instrument cluster which i would take something of new honda accord....
As an owner of a 2018 CX-5 Touring, I agree with most all of this. Though I have to say I average 26.5 MPG and occasionally dip into sport mode. I also have no problems at all using the navigation. I don't care much for the sound of "her" voice, it functions fine. But really, how often are you going to talk to your car? The only time I use it is when I want to go home, simply say "navigate home". Done. Every time without fail. Furthermore, for us the closet competition were the CR-V and Forester. In fact, I was dead set on getting the CR-V due to its countless awards and Honda reliability. After several days of driving cars, the CX-5 is completely different than those two. CVT transmissions aren't for me. The CR-V is so loud you have to scream at passengers while on an on ramp. I think we need to get past this "hard plastic" thing. I also think its a shame to overlook some of the perks and downfalls while spending time regurgitating horsepower and torque numbers that most car shoppers don't understand or care about. How about mentioning that if the touchscreen was the only function, you'd have to roll yourself pretty far forward to poke at the high screen. I actually really like the knob. It doesn't take long for it to be second nature. I don't like the cup holders at all. They are too small and to shallow. So putting almost any size coffee travel mug in there will hit your hand when resting it on the armrest. Yadayady. Maybe I should make my own review... lol. My two cents. Still like to hear what everyone else thinks about this car. I really like it. In my opinion, its the best sub 35K car in its class, best looking as well.
My wife owns a 2017 Grand Touring and my daughter owns a 2018 Grand Touring, both with the premium package. I agree with all your comments and observations. They also cross shopped the CR-V and the Forester and both enjoyed the handling and feel of the CX-5. I can see young families preferring the CR-V or Forster if cargo and passenger room are priorities. As a self-admitted Toyota fanboy, it will be interesting to see how the 2019 RAV4 stacks up as well.
Yeah, way too many reviewers whine so much about "hard plastic"...LOL. I have this same vehicle in white and don't give a f*** about it's hard plastic nor near 10 second 0-60 time.
We own a 2018 BMW X5 but bought the magnificent Grand Touring, mainly for my wife. To me, it stands way above the competition (I tested the Honda Cr-v) in styling, both exterior as interior, and driving dynamics. It is luxurious and elegant, and it seems everyday we discover a new feature that the Beemer doesn't have. We love this car.
I am your size, very comfortable in the seats. Love the car, no complaints. 29.8 MPH (half city / half highway). So many "toys" inside, I have not figured them all out
You can now get Aauto and Acarplay added to this model year. Just picked up a 2018 CX 5 GT. Great vehicle. Much more fun to drive than my 18 Honda CRV EXL.
actually , as someone who owned a 2015 GT model and now have a 2017 model, the front grille will have you having second thoughts upfront. I am not saying its bad , as a previous model owner it takes time to grow on you with the new one. Overall, Great bump n all aspects though, the 2017 model is amazing. Only wish they had upgraded the engine.
I actually like the look of the older models better, also. Especially the curved look to the bottom trim. That made it look sportier to me. To each his own, I guess.
Well, I like the 2017 design more than 2018, on the other hand eventhough the current generation isn't perfect lookswise, but i still prefer them to the past generation!
Great review (all of yours are great); however, you did a disservice to the Acura at the beginning of the review. Yes, it's a Honda - a Honda with a standard 3.5l V6. Love that CX-5, though.
I was down between deciding on the CX-5 GT AWD, tow package and Escape Titanium 2.0L AWD tow package and the Escape won, cause of watching various review of both brands, the Mazda won my heart on design it is best looking in the segment and it gear shifter, But the Escape is very much as fun to drive and agile like the CX-5, but a the power and towing capacity made the,Escape the clear winner. But fuel economy could be much better in the Escape I am averaging only 18 combo. Long trips I get 25 mpg, All with traction control disabled Worse than EPA, figures But it is still in the break in stage so after 10k I expect those #'s to improve,, slightly
Hi Chris ! This Mazda overall is striking in appearance. Especially in one of the best shades of red on the market. ( IMO ). However, I agree with you on your preference of the last generation C-X5. I prefer it as well. I think the overall design of the new one works but on a smaller scale like the C-X3. I will say this about Mazda's, their not boring! Great review as always.
I'll take the base Sport model with front wheel drive and cloth interior. White leather is a nightmare. Too bad the Sport model doesn't come with Sirius radio. Can it be installed and how much does that cost ? By the way, I agree with Chris, the styling of the 2016 model was just about perfect. This one is still one of the best looking small SUV's. Thanks.
Interior space has me leaning much more toward the CR-V. I feel like the Mazda feels very cramped and I'm not a tall person 5'9. Drove both and really enjoy the Mazda but the Honda just seems better for the things I want in an suv right now. Seems the Honda is able to return better mpg as well. As much as I like my Mazda 3 it is just too small and the CX-5 feels the same. Can't justify it based on my current needs. Just thought I'd offer my opinion in case anyone was on the fence. Honda CR-V Touring model is more then likely my next vehicle this time around.
It has been confirmed by Mazda Canada Apple Carplay and Andriod Auto are coming to Canada in September 2018. 2018 models can be retrofitted via software change. I am sure that will be the same for the US.
I hate when people say the Acura RDX is just a Honda. Of course it is. The Lexus is a Toyota, the Infiniti is a Nissan, the Audi is a Volkswagon and so on. The Acura RDX is an awesome car. I've been driving the RDXs since 2015 and absolutely love them. I love the look of the CX-5 but that engine with only 187hp is pretty weak IMHO.
They made the refreshed verrsion jeaavier and as a result so much slower. The 2.5L now feels anemic. No zoom zoom here. Add to that the numb steering and soft ride, it's no longer a fun drive. Chris absolutely nailed this review. Agree a about the looks and horrid wheels of the Chevy Malibu
Agree about numbness on center. I was surprised by it a well, considering Mazda reputation, but it was evident compared to SEAT Ateca, with has a far more engaging and immediate steering. This is a good review overall, but it completely omits ( as most car reviews) the reliability factor. I test drove this Mazda as well as Ateca and the SEAT was superior in most departments, bar one albeit very important one: with its VW TSI engine and DSG gearbox it is less reliable than Mazda in the long run. That makes it such a difficult choice. Mazda has a great reliable naturally aspirated engine, but it is also worth mentioning that the engine and exhaust manifold take a lot of space, resulting in a poor package: Ateca is significantly shorter, yet its' cabin feels more spacious, it has much more rear seat space with the same size boot. (SEAT Ateca is a VW group SUV that is sold in Europe and South America)
Struggling with deciding on the CX-5 vs the Tiguan. I prefer the exterior styling and the 2 tone leather on the CX-5 but I personally hate those tablet style consoles protruding from the dash. The Tiguan has led accents, pano moonroof, more cargo, customizable drive modes, and unlike him I actually prefer the digital guages. I'm just not sure it's worth the 4-5k extra on the pricetag
Chris, Nice review.... two things though: - What about the sound level? - What looks absolutely awful - and I repeated, awful - is that the center console is huge resulting in : it doesn't look at all that you can move your right knee / leg to the right, which I always do when putting the car on cruise control on a longer drive. You look really boxed in leg wise. This is tremendously annoying, at least for me. Who's ft size is 13 also.
Mazda promised since 2015 they will come out aa and carplay but nothing. Recently it came out but it requires extra hardware which means we have to pay for it. Forget it.
Weak engine and no passing power, I drove this thing. It has a nice ride if you don't live in a hilly area. This car is terrible with hills. They should offer turbo.
110% WRONG! I have this same vehicle in white and drive up and over the California Grapevine every weekend with my 2 kids and husband. 4000+ feet elevation without any problems at all and passing power is more than adequate. So no...it's not "terrible with hills"...LOL
Can’t say I agree with the “no passing power” and being “terrible on hills”, but I definitely agree that this model should come with the option for a turbo or a bigger engine. As much fun as I have in this vehicle, it does feel sluggish sometimes
asking for my daughter, she likes it, Im worried this doesn't have enough power. Anyone own one that can give an opinion on day to day real world driving?
ron davis got mine two weeks ago and absolutely love it. The ride is very comfortable and peaceful with the quiet cabin. Power is fine for daily driving and I have no problems passing on the freeway. It’s a mid market SUV, if you want to drive super aggressively get a sports car.
C J great because I’m getting delivered cx-5 on 21st of November and I’m tired of renting Mitsubishi from enterprise with car play that’s $148 every 4 days been that for nearly 3 weeks now
Volkswagen "premium"? Kia "premium"? Mazda "premium"? Any automaker who offers a car that starts under $20k can not compete with truly "premium" entry level luxury brands such as Acura or Buick.
"Premium" mean less and less these days, as budget cars get better materials and same options. I drove this Mazda and the interior looked more "premium" than some Mercs, Lexus and BMWs.
Yes, I agree that the interior quality on cheaper cars has become more upmarket and "premium." However, I highly doubt that people in the market for a Buick Enclave or say a BMW X5 will be cross-shopping with a $30,000 compact SUV made by Mazda.
@@ethanhess246 People buying a Mercedes GLE or BMW X5 probably won't be cross shopping it with a much cheaper Mazda, but quality is certainly not their only reason not to. Features, engine, brand image, and design may all influence a buyers decision.
@hvcshow Yet Buick is still considered an entry level luxury brand... Look at Lincoln. Their average owner's age is older than Buick's. It is common for luxury cars to have older owners because the people who buy luxury cars have more money than a 19 year old kid working at Subway who just bought a $20k Mazda3. A brand having an older buyer age further emphasizes the point that Buick is an entry level luxury brand because older people typically have more money than younger people who would buy your main stream Toyota, Honda, etc.
@@ethanhess246 I AM AN OLDER person.....and I don't think half of these cars are worth what they want for them. I do not believe the hype (EVEN if I DO have the money to pay for it). It's all geared towards the the younger buyers who think they're getting a GREAT DEAL because they have "Leather Interior" LOL LOL LOL LOL. BS I say. Just sell me a Quiet, Comfortable, Economic car with the HP to get out the way or Go Around (pass) the other car!! It's a CAR not my living room .
My brand new Mazda 2018 CX-5 lasted all of 4 months. With only 5,700 miles, the engine needs to be replaced. Yeah, I brought a true lemon. What's worst is the dealership is of no help. I have requested for Mazda to buy back their crap car. Wow, don't believe the hype, the Mazda CX-5 is not well made. It has been in the shop twice already and now needs an engine so I can't even drive my own car. Please look around for something more reliable. My previous vehicle, a 2005 Mazda Tribute which was purchased used in 2007 and lasted 13 years and never had any engine problems. It was probably because Ford designed the truck.
dude...no way older model looks better than previous.....design is spot on, makes old model looking outdated big time....this cx-5 kicks ass visually except instrument cluster which i would take something of new honda accord....
As an owner of a 2018 CX-5 Touring, I agree with most all of this. Though I have to say I average 26.5 MPG and occasionally dip into sport mode. I also have no problems at all using the navigation. I don't care much for the sound of "her" voice, it functions fine. But really, how often are you going to talk to your car? The only time I use it is when I want to go home, simply say "navigate home". Done. Every time without fail. Furthermore, for us the closet competition were the CR-V and Forester. In fact, I was dead set on getting the CR-V due to its countless awards and Honda reliability. After several days of driving cars, the CX-5 is completely different than those two. CVT transmissions aren't for me. The CR-V is so loud you have to scream at passengers while on an on ramp. I think we need to get past this "hard plastic" thing. I also think its a shame to overlook some of the perks and downfalls while spending time regurgitating horsepower and torque numbers that most car shoppers don't understand or care about. How about mentioning that if the touchscreen was the only function, you'd have to roll yourself pretty far forward to poke at the high screen. I actually really like the knob. It doesn't take long for it to be second nature. I don't like the cup holders at all. They are too small and to shallow. So putting almost any size coffee travel mug in there will hit your hand when resting it on the armrest. Yadayady. Maybe I should make my own review... lol. My two cents. Still like to hear what everyone else thinks about this car. I really like it. In my opinion, its the best sub 35K car in its class, best looking as well.
My wife owns a 2017 Grand Touring and my daughter owns a 2018 Grand Touring, both with the premium package. I agree with all your comments and observations. They also cross shopped the CR-V and the Forester and both enjoyed the handling and feel of the CX-5. I can see young families preferring the CR-V or Forster if cargo and passenger room are priorities. As a self-admitted Toyota fanboy, it will be interesting to see how the 2019 RAV4 stacks up as well.
Yeah, way too many reviewers whine so much about "hard plastic"...LOL. I have this same vehicle in white and don't give a f*** about it's hard plastic nor near 10 second 0-60 time.
We own a 2018 BMW X5 but bought the magnificent Grand Touring, mainly for my wife. To me, it stands way above the competition (I tested the Honda Cr-v) in styling, both exterior as interior, and driving dynamics. It is luxurious and elegant, and it seems everyday we discover a new feature that the Beemer doesn't have. We love this car.
Thanks for the feedback! Looking to purchase this model and your review was very helpful!
Tate Dillow well said! I’m taking your review to heart.
5 time Mazda owner. Just got the 2018 CX5 and loving everything about it!
I have a problem with y'all wanting to go fast, when all you should want is to take it easy and enjoy the ride. It's a beautiful car.
I am your size, very comfortable in the seats. Love the car, no complaints. 29.8 MPH (half city / half highway). So many "toys" inside, I have not figured them all out
Instantly recognizable in that beautiful red color, the CX-5 is impressing everything before it. Great video - thanks for sharing!
You can now get Aauto and Acarplay added to this model year. Just picked up a 2018 CX 5 GT. Great vehicle. Much more fun to drive than my 18 Honda CRV EXL.
I had it installed at the dealer, but there's supposedly a kit to DIY. Unfortunately, neither AA or CP is wireless.
Soon as he said he liked the older looks better, I paused the video, commented and left
I concur...he lost me at that comment.
actually , as someone who owned a 2015 GT model and now have a 2017 model, the front grille will have you having second thoughts upfront. I am not saying its bad , as a previous model owner it takes time to grow on you with the new one. Overall, Great bump n all aspects though, the 2017 model is amazing. Only wish they had upgraded the engine.
I actually like the look of the older models better, also. Especially the curved look to the bottom trim. That made it look sportier to me. To each his own, I guess.
Well, I like the 2017 design more than 2018, on the other hand eventhough the current generation isn't perfect lookswise, but i still prefer them to the past generation!
The 2017 and 2018 are the same design. The change occurred from 2016 to 2017.
I really wish this had ventilated seats and a 360 camera like the new Mazda 6. Maybe next year.
Shane Nelson or the turbo engine as the 6 as well. Agree
How important is ventilated seats?
Great review (all of yours are great); however, you did a disservice to the Acura at the beginning of the review. Yes, it's a Honda - a Honda with a standard 3.5l V6. Love that CX-5, though.
I was down between deciding on the CX-5 GT AWD, tow package and Escape Titanium 2.0L AWD tow package and the Escape won, cause of watching various review of both brands, the Mazda won my heart on design it is best looking in the segment and it gear shifter,
But the Escape is very much as fun to drive and agile like the CX-5, but a the power and towing capacity made the,Escape the clear winner.
But fuel economy could be much better in the Escape I am averaging only 18 combo. Long trips I get 25 mpg,
All with traction control disabled
Worse than EPA, figures
But it is still in the break in stage so after 10k I expect those #'s to improve,, slightly
Thanks for the review Chris. You say what we should know about a car.
Hi Chris ! This Mazda overall is striking in appearance. Especially in one of the best shades of red on the market. ( IMO ). However, I agree with you on your preference of the last generation C-X5. I prefer it as well. I think the overall design of the new one works but on a smaller scale like the C-X3. I will say this about Mazda's, their not boring! Great review as always.
Heard that nice red paint adds $695. to the price.........
Bextar636 I went to Mazda dealership they told me samething
The rear end reminds me of Jaguar F-Pace.
I'll take the base Sport model with front wheel drive and cloth interior. White leather is a nightmare. Too bad the Sport model doesn't come with Sirius radio. Can it be installed and how much does that cost ? By the way, I agree with Chris, the styling of the 2016 model was just about perfect. This one is still one of the best looking small SUV's. Thanks.
Like always an awesome review. I just don't understand why the don't put the turbo engine on the CUV. Or why they don't make the CX-7 again...
Gustavo Newman the maxda6 just got it. It's a mystery to me why the cx5 dosen't have turbo option.
Chris, do you have a channel where you review power tools and appliances? If not, could you start a channel for this. Your review style is perfect!
Well detailed and balanced review!
Interior space has me leaning much more toward the CR-V. I feel like the Mazda feels very cramped and I'm not a tall person 5'9. Drove both and really enjoy the Mazda but the Honda just seems better for the things I want in an suv right now. Seems the Honda is able to return better mpg as well. As much as I like my Mazda 3 it is just too small and the CX-5 feels the same. Can't justify it based on my current needs. Just thought I'd offer my opinion in case anyone was on the fence. Honda CR-V Touring model is more then likely my next vehicle this time around.
One of the best reviewer in the industry
It has been confirmed by Mazda Canada Apple Carplay and Andriod Auto are coming to Canada in September 2018. 2018 models can be retrofitted via software change. I am sure that will be the same for the US.
this is great news. Does that mean if I buy on of the 2018 Cx5s I will be able to use Android car play, say within 12 months from now?
@@hypnotechno
Yes but it won't be automatic. You will need to visit your local dealer and let them install the correct software.
I hate when people say the Acura RDX is just a Honda. Of course it is. The Lexus is a Toyota, the Infiniti is a Nissan, the Audi is a Volkswagon and so on. The Acura RDX is an awesome car. I've been driving the RDXs since 2015 and absolutely love them. I love the look of the CX-5 but that engine with only 187hp is pretty weak IMHO.
They made the refreshed verrsion jeaavier and as a result so much slower. The 2.5L now feels anemic. No zoom zoom here. Add to that the numb steering and soft ride, it's no longer a fun drive. Chris absolutely nailed this review. Agree a about the looks and horrid wheels of the Chevy Malibu
Got 1 today awesome whip
How spacious is the driver's seat?? I'm 6ft 2". Please let me know.
Agree about numbness on center. I was surprised by it a well, considering Mazda reputation, but it was evident compared to SEAT Ateca, with has a far more engaging and immediate steering. This is a good review overall, but it completely omits ( as most car reviews) the reliability factor. I test drove this Mazda as well as Ateca and the SEAT was superior in most departments, bar one albeit very important one: with its VW TSI engine and DSG gearbox it is less reliable than Mazda in the long run. That makes it such a difficult choice. Mazda has a great reliable naturally aspirated engine, but it is also worth mentioning that the engine and exhaust manifold take a lot of space, resulting in a poor package: Ateca is significantly shorter, yet its' cabin feels more spacious, it has much more rear seat space with the same size boot. (SEAT Ateca is a VW group SUV that is sold in Europe and South America)
Disagree on styling (of course subjective) - newer car is much cleaner and more upscale.
Struggling with deciding on the CX-5 vs the Tiguan. I prefer the exterior styling and the 2 tone leather on the CX-5 but I personally hate those tablet style consoles protruding from the dash. The Tiguan has led accents, pano moonroof, more cargo, customizable drive modes, and unlike him I actually prefer the digital guages. I'm just not sure it's worth the 4-5k extra on the pricetag
It's NOT worth it....trust me LOL!
Chris,
Nice review.... two things though:
- What about the sound level?
- What looks absolutely awful - and I repeated, awful - is that the center console is huge resulting in : it doesn't look at all that you can move your right knee / leg to the right, which I always do when putting the car on cruise control on a longer drive.
You look really boxed in leg wise.
This is tremendously annoying, at least for me.
Who's ft size is 13 also.
Any video on the logetivity of the CX5.
Can’t you add apple CarPlay to the car now?
Yes
How does this trim level
Not have apple car play and android auto ??
Getting 2018 cx-5 next week but within 6 months switching for 2019 that has turbo option
How does this not have apple car play ?
Looks good
The cx5 looks good
Chris, get yourself some un-tuck-it shirts to be stylish.
GRACIAS🙏
Give the mazdas turbo!!! Cmon
It got heavier due to sound deadening for 2018. Just wait for 2019 model; new design, new engine.
What did you do with the car guru? I mean Rich Rebuilds
Decent looking car inside & out with adequate driving dynamis & power As a whole it's a great car
Mazda promised since 2015 they will come out aa and carplay but nothing. Recently it came out but it requires extra hardware which means we have to pay for it. Forget it.
More powa!
Weak engine and no passing power, I drove this thing. It has a nice ride if you don't live in a hilly area. This car is terrible with hills. They should offer turbo.
110% WRONG! I have this same vehicle in white and drive up and over the California Grapevine every weekend with my 2 kids and husband. 4000+ feet elevation without any problems at all and passing power is more than adequate. So no...it's not "terrible with hills"...LOL
Can’t say I agree with the “no passing power” and being “terrible on hills”, but I definitely agree that this model should come with the option for a turbo or a bigger engine. As much fun as I have in this vehicle, it does feel sluggish sometimes
Troy V good thing 2019 cx5-9 has turbo and sport option your cry to heavens has been heard!!!!!!
You like the older model more? what the fuck
asking for my daughter, she likes it, Im worried this doesn't have enough power. Anyone own one that can give an opinion on day to day real world driving?
ron davis got mine two weeks ago and absolutely love it. The ride is very comfortable and peaceful with the quiet cabin. Power is fine for daily driving and I have no problems passing on the freeway. It’s a mid market SUV, if you want to drive super aggressively get a sports car.
this guy has weird taste.
>Mazda does not support Apple CarPlay or Android Auto
That's enough for me to pass.
Matt crazy I noticed having Mitsubishi has it 2018 yeah that sucks
They will have it soon. You will be able to go to the dealer and get a software upgrade for free by January
C J great because I’m getting delivered cx-5 on 21st of November and I’m tired of renting Mitsubishi from enterprise with car play that’s $148 every 4 days been that for nearly 3 weeks now
C J so question is within 6 months swap if I want to get turbo version
please give us a turbo cx5, than call me
Looks like a wagon.
2 much moola.
This must not be a US review. The touring does not come with auto start as a standard option.
What no apple play ? going to Honda CRV sorry Mazda !
Michal Misio crv has problem with oil mixing with gas. Apple CarPlay can be added on to the Mazda.
I have Carplay in my cx5, it was an extrs of 180€
slow engine, no thank you. mazda needs to stop trying to be premium and offer more engine options
Volkswagen "premium"? Kia "premium"? Mazda "premium"? Any automaker who offers a car that starts under $20k can not compete with truly "premium" entry level luxury brands such as Acura or Buick.
"Premium" mean less and less these days, as budget cars get better materials and same options. I drove this Mazda and the interior looked more "premium" than some Mercs, Lexus and BMWs.
Yes, I agree that the interior quality on cheaper cars has become more upmarket and "premium." However, I highly doubt that people in the market for a Buick Enclave or say a BMW X5 will be cross-shopping with a $30,000 compact SUV made by Mazda.
@@ethanhess246
People buying a Mercedes GLE or BMW X5 probably won't be cross shopping it with a much cheaper Mazda, but quality is certainly not their only reason not to. Features, engine, brand image, and design may all influence a buyers decision.
@hvcshow Yet Buick is still considered an entry level luxury brand... Look at Lincoln. Their average owner's age is older than Buick's. It is common for luxury cars to have older owners because the people who buy luxury cars have more money than a 19 year old kid working at Subway who just bought a $20k Mazda3. A brand having an older buyer age further emphasizes the point that Buick is an entry level luxury brand because older people typically have more money than younger people who would buy your main stream Toyota, Honda, etc.
@@ethanhess246 I AM AN OLDER person.....and I don't think half of these cars are worth what they want for them. I do not believe the hype (EVEN if I DO have the money to pay for it). It's all geared towards the the younger buyers who think they're getting a GREAT DEAL because they have "Leather Interior" LOL LOL LOL LOL. BS I say. Just sell me a Quiet, Comfortable, Economic car with the HP to get out the way or Go Around (pass) the other car!! It's a CAR not my living room .
My brand new Mazda 2018 CX-5 lasted all of 4 months. With only 5,700 miles, the engine needs to be replaced. Yeah, I brought a true lemon. What's worst is the dealership is of no help. I have requested for Mazda to buy back their crap car.
Wow, don't believe the hype, the Mazda CX-5 is not well made. It has been in the shop twice already and now needs an engine so I can't even drive my own car. Please look around for something more reliable. My previous vehicle, a 2005 Mazda Tribute which was purchased used in 2007 and lasted 13 years and never had any engine problems. It was probably because Ford designed the truck.
GET A LAWYER ....! NOW !