They got so much right finally - 22mm lugs, looks great. Not as top heavy as deep sea. 3235 movement, 70 hours, magnetic resistant. Slightly smaller than the hefty deep sea. Red text is a signal to the original and very pretty. Their best sports watch in years.
I also would agree with you on the use of a NATO strap on this particular watch. I owned a Deep Sea for a while and then got a pretty good deal on the Cameron D BLUE version, and while I loved the watch, I always felt the bracelet was a minor weakness. The 21mm lugs looked a little too thin on such a monstrous watch and I always felt it was a little lazy of Rolex to not develop a better 'proportioned' bracelet. The Deep Sea was also top heavy and I found a good high grade black rubber strap suited it well. This new Sea Dweller - Rolex has just tweaked the design, made the bracelet 1mm wider, and reduced the width of the watch by 1mm. It just shows that even very minor changes can have such a positive impact on a watch overall. I have mine ordered by the AD and I should get it in the next month or so all being well, I wont be wearing a nato on it for sure. I have read some complaints about the size increase from 40mm to 43mm, but I always felt a full on dive watch should be slightly larger than the Submariner, rather than just 'deeper' to accommodate the extra pressure of the water. I always liked that about the Deep Sea, but as I said - very top heavy watch and difficult to get under a shirt for instance. Its the best watch Rolex have made in a long time IMO and I think finally they have all the dimensions spot on - this is from a guy who has spent the last 20 years wearing Rolex sports watches. The red lettering is such a nice touch - its how the range started back in the 1960's - so it all feels very authentic to me. Been a bit disappointed with some of their watches recently, but this one is spectacular. Health to enjoy it Jack.
spot on. I own the Deep Sea Cameron. I as well feel the bracelet could be a little wider. however, I don't find it top heavy. I do wear my watches tight tho. They got this new Sea Dweller perfect.
Got mine today and i love it, very happy. Its what i always wanted from the deep sea. I was number one on the list and my ad said there are 30 after me and they closed the list! Also heard on good inside news that the red writing will only be around for a year then it will go back to white.
I too never liked the cyclops hence always wanted a sea dweller instead of a sub date. But after getting the SD43, I've learnt to embrace it and am loving the watch. I'm all for Rolex trying to make the 50th anniversary SD special by including the cyclops (since now possible due to tech advancement so it can withstand the pressure) and the red text (I am a sucker for the red text). I had a Wow moment when I first put the SD 43 on my wrist. Cannot imagine my life without it now!
Lots of positives. The negatives could include that the flat side profile doesn’t hug the wrist on such a big piece and the lugs would have benefitted from slight curvature. There’s fresh air under those flat lug ends to your wrist and this makes it look too big for you - although you are virtually perching the piece on your hand anyway. Worn loose as you have it this watch is going to be uncomfortable bouncing around playing sport. With the weight this will be an issue. Apart from those minor quibbles it’s a great watch all round.
This is how a watch review should be done. I've always liked the Submariner but felt that at 40mm, it was a bit small for my wrist. The 43mm SD seems to have solved that but at the same time it seems a bit "tall" on the wrist. I imagine I'd get used to that though. With a 70 hour power reserve, the increased case diameter, the 50th anniversary SD looks like a certain winner. Again, great review and thanks Jack.
DML Channel - Thank you for your thoughts. You'd definitely get used to the size - it's depth is actually the same as its predecessor and most of it is hidden underneath the case when on the wrist. I cannot see anyone being disappointed once they put one on. Let me know what you think if you treat yourself :)
I was doing some research and it seems the SD43mm is just 2mm thicker than the Submariner (if my research is accurate, 15mm on the SD versus 13mm on the Sub). If true, a 50 Anniversary Sea-Dweller will be in my future.
DML Channel its riding tall on the wrist as it has a flat lug profile without curvature on a big watch Head. You don’t notice that on a sub as it’s smaller. The deep sea at 44mm rides taller still. By taller I mean that it will appear to float on the wrist with gaps under the lugs to the wrist. Unless you have a very big flat wrist of north of 8 inches.
Picked one up today. It's absolutely perfect because with the cyclops, it's like a bigger version of the submariner. I couldn't be happier. Great, in depth review!
Thank you for your great review. For me, it's the perfect Rolex Sport watch at the moment. The new movement is a great improvement (you can already feel it when adjusting the time or winding the crown). Another big improvement besides the perfect lugs and perfect size is the improvement of the pearl as well. In the submariner it sits higher but with the SD43 it sits much lower. Amazing watch!!!
Just a fantastic review. Best one I have seen. Great job. I keep coming back to this video over and over as I wait patiently and painfully for this watch to become available in my area. I have a larger wrist and I just think (for me) this is THE perfect watch. They just nailed it. The bracelet looks perfect. The width of the bezel looks just right for the 43 mm case size. The watch is thick and hefty, but not obnoxiously thick like the DSSD. I can't wait to try one on. Thanks for posting this Jack!
You're welcome, Mike! Thank you for the feedback - really appreciate it! Your love and passion for this watch mirrors mine and I really hope you acquire one.
I own many Rolexes and I have all of the dive Rolexes, including the 2018 Deepsea Sea-Dweller James Cameron and the Submariner Date (Hulk). Of all that I own, this SD 43 50th Anniversary is the one that's on my wrist right now. It's easily my favorite. It's simply perfect.
@@Brutelson Thanks! In addition to the above watches, I actually have two Pepsi jubilees...and two Batmen, a TT Root Beer GMT, and a SS ceramic Daytona. I'm now waiting for another Daytona (I have the black dial and I want the white dial) and a blue dial SS Sky-Dweller. My ADs have been very good to me!
damachine3 - lovely! I got mine in December. Haven’t reviewed it yet. I do love the TT Root Beer. I love that Clint Eastwood wore his vintage Root Beer in many of his movies. White Ceramic Daytona is another amazing choice. It’s the only white dial i prefer over a black dial.
@@Brutelson Same here! It's the only white dial that I prefer over a black dial. I initially thought I wanted the black dial, so I bought it. Now I have asked my dealer for the white dial and expect to get it fairly soon. Cheers!
Best for me is the excellent 3235 cal, But i'll keep my Deepsea. One thing that is never mentioned is the crystal on the DS is same hight as the bezel. So impossible to chip the outer edge unlike the Subs and sea dweller!
Great review. THANK YOU. don't know why "some" find the Cyclopes like an eye sore ??! ... i don't mind it all all especially for my aging eyes. lovely watch. but i disagree with you on wearing it with something other than the Metal Bracelet. i've seen it on Rubber-B Strap and it looks Awesome... Thanks again. Cheers
Went to buy the Deepsea and walked out with this baby (50th Anniversary). I have a 7 n 1/2 inch wrist, its perfect.Wear it nearly everyday, shared with my Omega Man on the Moon. ....OK now I'm just bragging =/
Picking up mine tomorrow. I have the James Cameron and that one is top heavy but I'll never sell it as it was my first new Rolex that I bought. Since then it has been vintage Rolex's and Tudors. The Sub 5514 is the first Rolex with the HEV. I have a pre-COMEX 5514, no COMEX writing on the face. Great watch and it has more than doubled in price for me. Great review!
Hi Jack, very useful review, greatly appreciated! I'm on the list for this SD50, AD said she'd be able to get me one by XMas , which is lovely! Unfortunately, my wrist circumference is "only" 17cm, and probably closer to 16.5 in winter. Fortunately, I'm of a well-built stature - been going to the gym for years - and while my wrist is thin, my forearms aren't. Can I pull this off? I own a Breitling Superocean 42 which doesn't wear too big. Keen to hear your opinion. Thanks!
Hi Shuigui, I absolutely believe you can pull one off on your size wrist. To be fair you’re not too far off my 17.78cm size wrist and this SD43 fits a treat. It can’t hurt to carry on with those push ups - they’ll keep the wrists and forearms solid and this heavy hitting diver will supplement that for sure. It’s truly a beautiful watch - I’m excited for you. Merry Christmas and enjoy it.
Nice review but please take the time to get the wrist shot from a decent angle not too close up because it was totally unclear if it fit well or didn't based on what you showed. Great vid though.
Thank you for this. Are you saying that I should show a long shot of it on my wrist? Not sure what you mean by 'decent angle' as I did tilt and show different views of it on my wrist. Many thanks.
It is optional after you take it home. If you don't like it, take it off when you unbox it, it will take all of 5 to 10 min! With that said, I suspect this one will be a collector so I would keep it as is...
Great video. Update since then on the cyclops. It’s been reported that due to the increase in size from 40 to 43, the movement was too small for the increased size. This caused the date window to sit awkwardly too far away from the edge of the watch. Adding the date magnifier gives the illusion of it being nicely placed on the dial. When looking at it without it, the date appears to sit way too far towards the middle if the watch. Hopefully my AD will call before I die so I can have my very own!! Love it. Great video.
Brilliant review and thanks for taking the time to take us through it in such detail. It would have been great to have included your wrist size prior to posting the video as it takes away somewhat from the experience. I will now be checking back to see if you have added it in description. I am dying to lay my eyes/hands on one so lucky you. Only other feedback is that it will great if you wore it properly and took the shots from different angles. It was resting above your wrist and on your hand so not a true reflection of a solid fitting. Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work
Thank you Leonardo Pudicomp for your feedback - much appreciated. However, the way I wore the watch in the video is how I actually wear it normally. I have an area of permanent rough skin below the knuckles where the crown on all my watches rubs slightly. Just my preference :) I've added my wrist size to the description - 8 inches / 20cm in circumference. Good luck!
Stick your name down regardless. The AD will call you in and if you don't like the size, politely say 'no thank you' and the AD will call up the next person on their long waiting list.
Great review, thanks for sharing. I have to say I fully agree with your impression and I'll even go further. I was lucky enough to purchase this watch two weeks ago at my AD, being first on the waiting list. It blew me away. It's big on my 6.9in / 17.5cm wrist but not overly so, no overhang. It oozes masculinity without overdoing it. Larger case, dial (now 29mm), bezel, hour hand, bracelet (22mm). Tapered lugs and larger bracelet help with balance and proportion. Now at last with the first 3235 movement in a sports model. Then there's the red lettering to make it a little bit more special and remind us of its heritage. I just love everything about this watch. I paid retail for it and I did it gladly. Such a purposeful looking toolwatch that doesn't need fat ugly lugs nor unbearably thick and top heavy case to make it look muscular. Rolex nailed it on the head. It is the perfect sports watch to me. I also own a Yacht-Master platinum dial, got it just before it was discontinued in summer 2016. Compared to the new Sea-Dweller, the YM almost feels dainty and feminine, by today's standard, a much thinner and dressier piece for sure. They complement eachother rather well, one being bold and beautiful and the other refined and elegant if I may say so. I might sell the YM as I think this Sea-Dweller is probably all the Rolex I'll ever want. In fact I'm tempted to drastically consolidate my collection after this and come closer to the one watch man I used to be long ago. Yeah, this is how good this Sea-Dweller is. Its the Super Submariner I've always wanted.
Nexus Achiles - I couldn't have said it better myself! Congratulations on obtaining one! I too could easily revert to being a 'Lone Watch Wolf' / 'One Watch Man' - this Sea-Dweller has it all and I don't feel I will ever desire another Rolex. I feel that a huge part of my watch addiction has been cured because of this piece. I still love watches but I have no desire to obtain another Diver. Everything I need and want in a watch is right here 😘
What a lovely watch, the balance of the watch is superior to the Deep Sea. I don't believe Rolex will discontinue the watch after three years, I think they will keep it in their catalogue going forward.
Slipstream - The SD4K is still one of the best Sea-Dwellers ever made. It just took two years and an early discontinuation for people to realise. Hold on to it
FYI this is a SD 50th Anniversary MK1 Dial. There is no Painted Crown at the 6 O'clock.. Just thought you might wanna know that ...The New MK2 have the crown painted at the 6 o'clock.
I love my DEEPSEA first of all and it's not heavy or big if you have a big wrist like me. With that being said I do like the 50th anniversary and I really like the new date window just like the Submariner but it makes It look just like that the most common Rolex on the market "stainless steel submariner"..
Ash Burton - The Red SeaDweller will definitely be the better investment. The Blue SD is relatively attainable where as if you’re not already on a waiting list for the Red SD then you realistically won’t get one. It’s also a 50th Anniversary. If the 50th Submariner is anything to go by - I’d estimate that in 10-15 years time your Red SD investment will have at minimum doubled. The new updated Blue SD released at Basel 2018 will in my opinion cannibalize the previous model with the inferior bracelet. So we may see the investment for these either slightly subside/hold rather than increase. Hope this helps.
Jack C cheers for the detailed reply mate, i was hoping that they would discontinue the D-Blue but i have to agree with you i think now its had a proper release i cant see me making much on my D-Blue. My mate is next on the list for a 50th Sea-Dweller and has paid deposit, exchanged contracts, he is selling it to me but they keep the warranty card for 12 months now, so im lucky to be able to get one.
Ash Burton - That’s fantastic news on the Red SD - very happy for you. I can safely say that you’re going to like it much, much more than the Blue SD. That’ll be a few pints you’ll owe your mate! Although slightly annoying about the warranty card, a 12 month wait on a watch you’re planning to keep is a small sacrifice to appease the AD. I was spared this rule when I got mine last year but they did insist on taking off all the plastic which was totally fine with me as I’ve been wearing it constantly ever since.
Jack C cheers, yes i hear most AD are taking the stickers off and insist on 12 month before relesing the warranty card on all sports models, fine by me and will only drive the grey market prices up i guess. 👍🏼
Hi Alam, I chose the Red Sea-Dweller because the proportion and size is better, it's more desirable and exclusive (factually and personally), it's the nicer looking watch, black is much more compatible for every occasion use than green, the 3235 movement in the Sea-Dweller is absolutely superb and better in every way and on a personal level I love the history behind the Sea-Dweller. If you have the opportunity to get the Sea-Dweller at RRP or best price possible - do it without hesitation. You'll never need or want another watch. Good luck!
Alam - yes I know it’s in USD. In the UK, this watch averages the equivalent of between $17-18.5K. I believe it will run for 2-3 years max before discontinuation.
Haha, you’re welcome! I’ve nothing against NATO’s straps in general - they are a great way to customise your watch. But with the SD43, a nato would dress it down in my opinion :) All the best!
@@chris3081 I owned it at the time but sold it to buy the Pepsi instead which I still have. I loved the SD but preferred the size and colours of the GMT Master II. Both amazing watches but I couldn’t afford to have both.
@@Brutelson fair enough size clearly better on the GMT, you seem to not care about the SD size in the video though. That’s what is making me think I’ll be fine. Did you ever find out what wrist size you have?
@@chris3081 my wrist size is 7 inches. I didn’t have a problem with the SD’s size (only the DeepSea which I respect but personally dislike because it’s not practical for daily wear). But 40mm is the ‘sweet spot’ for a Rolex and the Pepsi was just so slender and cool. It’s hard for a watch to pull off being both elegant and rugged which is the impression I get from the Pepsi. I tried it on before my name came up on the list and had to have it. But had that not been the case, I’d be rocking that SD right now because it is a beautiful piece.
Big, heavy, this is basically a great beach & leisure watch which means weekends and holidays. I have a SuperOcean Abyss for that : same size, automatic escape valve, 1500 meters, as attractive, a third of the price and I'm perfectly happy with an ETA movement. I much more prefer a 14060, at least I can wear this on a more everyday basis, like some of the thin sword-hands Seamasters.
I disagree - the SD "50th" is a perfect everyday watch and if it was my only watch I'd be extremely happy. I love Breitling, however the SuperOcean Abyss is an ugly dive watch and has nothing on this SD (except a better price tag. This SD's movement, steel, finishing, bezel, bracelet....need I go on....are all better than the Breitling. It is an unfair comparison - totally different leagues. The only watch worthy of being labelled a rival to this SD, in my opinion, is the Grand Seiko SBGA029 "Spring Drive Diver". As for the Rolex 14060 - nice watch, but again a futile comparison. It is an older Rolex which is pre-ceramic with an inferior and archaic movement. This SD is the new Rolex Professional model people have been waiting for. It is such a shame that many watch enthusiasts won't be able to enjoy it due to the availability and super-inflated pre-owned prices. I wish you well and please don't be offended by my disagreeing with you. I hope you to get to see one of these in the flesh. If you do, let me know what you think.
I agree Young, I own both the DSSD-Cameron and this new 43mm Sea Dweller, I don't find the DSSD top heavy , etc. They use a titanium back and that lightens the Deep Sea a lot. Also, I wear my watches on the tighter side on my wrist, so find no real weight difference between the DSSD and the new Sea Dweller.
George, I just got the new 43mm Sea Dweller last week. I love it. However, I also have a DSSD-Cameron, and that is still my favorite Rolex. The gradient blue/black dial really out shines the new Sea Dweller's lacquered black dial, but the single line of red text is pretty darn cool.
Oh yes, I was extremely lucky and got the new Sea dweller 43 mm in late September. Yes..I'm loving it. I alternate wearing it with the DSSD-Cameron every other day.
the increased case size without increasing the depth rating. cyclops doesn't fit at all. the only positive thing is the red marking and the new movement.
The extra case depth is negligible once its on the wrist and in comparison to the DeepSea there is no competition. I think both can be appreciated on their own merit but I think Rolex have learnt from their mistakes with the DeepSea and SD4000 and produced what I believe to be an almost perfect Sea-Dweller.
I have a 2002 Y series SeaDweller. I wear it if I don't want bling. This huge thing is all big, bling, in the face. If I want bling I'll slap on my black dial Daytona, steel bezel.
i wanted to buy one.simple, call a Dealer.called and emailed to 9 Dealers in Australia, 9!only one bothered to call me.paid a deposit, am 3rd on the list, and they have no idea when they will get mine.now I have to be content to look at videos of people who already have one, damn!
Rolex Sea dweller with a cyclops. I love my £300 44mm Seagull Ocean Star with the cyclops on the sapphire. Rolex Submariners are too small for me. This model deep sea is the first Rolex I would buy if I had the money. The bevelling on the case of my Seagull is better than this Sea Dweller.
neil piper Yes the 44mm SOS is a very handsome diver. My collective negative opinion on all current steel sports Rolex watches is that there is no bevelled edges anymore. There absolutely used to be but not anymore since the introduction of the ceramic models. Puzzling because Tudor still bevel their cases which definitely makes the finishing of their cases look better and crisper.
Sorry but what you state about the cyclops is wrong. It couldn't have anything to do with sapphire....because the older model references had DOMED PLEXIGLASS crystals....Oh, and thanks for the great review. Super watch.
Jake Jones - I think you've just substantiated that point entirely to be honest. But I am quoting Rolex on this. Whatever their reasons I am more than content with the cyclops now. It grows on you if you weren't previously a fan.
Love the review apart from what you say about not putting it on a nato or otherwise. If and when i buy this watch i think it would suit a nato and many other straps .... for example check out @jackostraps on facebook or instagram for an incredible Ndc strap with absolute supreme comfort and military provenance.
Jatthew Mackson - Ha, I knew I'd come under fire from a NATO lover over my sentiments on this topic. Each to their own, mate. I've tried mixing it up with NATO straps on previous watches but I can't get into it. I'm just a huge advocate of the quality, workmanship and comfort behind Rolex & Tudor bracelets. Steel all the way for me 👍🏻
Lugs are too wide for the bracelet, Rolex should have tapered it off better. The end links do not sit flush with the case and the watch looks blocky on your wrist. It is definitely too big and needs to be paired down a bit. The Tudor Black Bay (especially the new steel bezel) is a better watch.
Thank you for your feedback, however I 100% disagree with absolutely everything on your post. Rolex have rectified ALL the mistakes they made with the DSSD bracelet and created what is now a superb example which is proportionate, tapers beautifully with much better designed solid end links and has all the micro adjustment innovations to boot. I love the original Tudor Black 2824 - superb watch and I'll never part with mine. The 'Black' Black Bay 2824 is the 'investment' one to grab (made for a very short period and limited production). I don't mind the second generation BBs but they have nothing on the originals. As for the new Tudor Black Bay with Steel Bezel.... Personally, I think its another fail by Tudor. Its very reminiscent of the Hydronaut II - just less ugly. I predict that this new model will be a major flop which will be unfortunate as Tudor has had a bad couple of years lately. I still love the brand but they are in danger of flooding the mid-tier market with superfluous and inspirational models. These are just my opinions, Mac - each to their own. I do recommend that you see a Sea-Dweller 50th in person - I think you'll surprise yourself :)
I know you are blown away by this watch but seriously forward to 23.37, does that look aesthetic? I also agree that the cyclops has no business being on there as well. I personally expect a much more aesthetic design and fit for the price that they are asking.
Mac Daddy - At 23:37 my wrist is arched at an angle to over-emphasise the case depth. In reality and when worn normally, the heft is disguised a lot underneath the watch. In my opinion, this enhances my appreciation and love of how well Rolex have designed this watch aesthetically. Also (and I mean no disrespect at all Mac), what were you expecting?? Bottom line: this is a Sea-Dweller - with a new and incredibly durable movement and a depth rating of 4000ft! I am genuinely surprised that it's not thicker. If you want slim - stick with the Submariner. I great watch and will always set the ' gold standard' when it comes to a quality, bullet-proof dive watch. The Submariner will never be beaten for what it is and has stood for all these years. However...... If you want something a little bit more special with it's own history (albeit nicely connected to the Submariner) and significance in the Rolex Diver range - I vote a Sea-Dweller hands down and by a '50' mile stretch! The 50th SD for me is almost perfect in every way shape and form. As I said, I have made my peace with that damn cyclops ;) All the best my friend!
Understood. You love the watch. That's cool. But for me it's proportions are all wrong and look strange on most wrists. I prefer the Tudor Black Bay proportions, fit and finish over the Rolex SD.
I wouldn't bet on the red text lasting for more than a year, like the original 1967 single line of red text. They might switch to two lines of red, or more probably, go to all white text. If you want one of these, I'd suggest grabbing one as soon as you can!
Agreed. There are far better watch channels on CZcams that do the fancy editing and smooth transitions. I didn’t have the time back then to be very creative and still don’t. This review was also far too long. Lesson learnt.
very disappointed with this 50th annv SD, nothing more than a enlarged sub. the sub can be replicated but never duplicated. The disappointment comes from seeing rolex replicating it themselves.... but oh well, they own both, they can do whatever they want, but I m cherishing my sub date even more.
I disagree. If anything I would look at this as a more modern, beefed up sub on steroids. IMO, the sub seems too dainty by todays diver standards, I think they nailed it on this one!
with the money they charge for a watch not being able to get a colour correct on the bezel in unacceptable and just goes to show they’re overpriced and overrated
Hi there, great video, I’m looking at trading my submariner Hulk in for this over the next few days, you think this is a good idea? I love them both and as much as I’m not buying as an investment but because I love them do you think this could increase in value as much as the hulk has? Thanks
They got so much right finally - 22mm lugs, looks great. Not as top heavy as deep sea. 3235 movement, 70 hours, magnetic resistant. Slightly smaller than the hefty deep sea. Red text is a signal to the original and very pretty. Their best sports watch in years.
I also would agree with you on the use of a NATO strap on this particular watch. I owned a Deep Sea for a while and then got a pretty good deal on the Cameron D BLUE version, and while I loved the watch, I always felt the bracelet was a minor weakness. The 21mm lugs looked a little too thin on such a monstrous watch and I always felt it was a little lazy of Rolex to not develop a better 'proportioned' bracelet. The Deep Sea was also top heavy and I found a good high grade black rubber strap suited it well.
This new Sea Dweller - Rolex has just tweaked the design, made the bracelet 1mm wider, and reduced the width of the watch by 1mm. It just shows that even very minor changes can have such a positive impact on a watch overall. I have mine ordered by the AD and I should get it in the next month or so all being well, I wont be wearing a nato on it for sure.
I have read some complaints about the size increase from 40mm to 43mm, but I always felt a full on dive watch should be slightly larger than the Submariner, rather than just 'deeper' to accommodate the extra pressure of the water. I always liked that about the Deep Sea, but as I said - very top heavy watch and difficult to get under a shirt for instance.
Its the best watch Rolex have made in a long time IMO and I think finally they have all the dimensions spot on - this is from a guy who has spent the last 20 years wearing Rolex sports watches. The red lettering is such a nice touch - its how the range started back in the 1960's - so it all feels very authentic to me. Been a bit disappointed with some of their watches recently, but this one is spectacular. Health to enjoy it Jack.
Fantastic information - totally agree with you!
Let me know when you get yours and tell me your thoughts in the flesh.
spot on. I own the Deep Sea Cameron. I as well feel the bracelet could be a little wider. however, I don't find it top heavy. I do wear my watches tight tho. They got this new Sea Dweller perfect.
Got mine today and i love it, very happy. Its what i always wanted from the deep sea. I was number one on the list and my ad said there are 30 after me and they closed the list! Also heard on good inside news that the red writing will only be around for a year then it will go back to white.
theonlyredspecial I hope you are right regarding the red text. Not that I would ever sell mine, it is nice to know you own something unique
The best looking and size-balances rolex period
I too never liked the cyclops hence always wanted a sea dweller instead of a sub date. But after getting the SD43, I've learnt to embrace it and am loving the watch. I'm all for Rolex trying to make the 50th anniversary SD special by including the cyclops (since now possible due to tech advancement so it can withstand the pressure) and the red text (I am a sucker for the red text). I had a Wow moment when I first put the SD 43 on my wrist. Cannot imagine my life without it now!
Mark Njo Well said my friend. The very words I said when I first tried it on is: “This is the watch to end all watches.”
The Mark 1 did only last a year but it has outlived the 3 years. Lovely watch. Thankfully it no longer comes with the flip lock divers extension.
Lots of positives. The negatives could include that the flat side profile doesn’t hug the wrist on such a big piece and the lugs would have benefitted from slight curvature. There’s fresh air under those flat lug ends to your wrist and this makes it look too big for you - although you are virtually perching the piece on your hand anyway. Worn loose as you have it this watch is going to be uncomfortable bouncing around playing sport. With the weight this will be an issue. Apart from those minor quibbles it’s a great watch all round.
Nice review! I’m a 7” wrist and own a Sub ND. I was reluctant in the SD43 for its size but now I think I need it! Thanks!
This is how a watch review should be done.
I've always liked the Submariner but felt that at 40mm, it was a bit small for my wrist. The 43mm SD seems to have solved that but at the same time it seems a bit "tall" on the wrist. I imagine I'd get used to that though.
With a 70 hour power reserve, the increased case diameter, the 50th anniversary SD looks like a certain winner.
Again, great review and thanks Jack.
DML Channel - Thank you for your thoughts. You'd definitely get used to the size - it's depth is actually the same as its predecessor and most of it is hidden underneath the case when on the wrist. I cannot see anyone being disappointed once they put one on. Let me know what you think if you treat yourself :)
I was doing some research and it seems the SD43mm is just 2mm thicker than the Submariner (if my research is accurate, 15mm on the SD versus 13mm on the Sub).
If true, a 50 Anniversary Sea-Dweller will be in my future.
DML Channel its riding tall on the wrist as it has a flat lug profile without curvature on a big watch Head. You don’t notice that on a sub as it’s smaller. The deep sea at 44mm rides taller still. By taller I mean that it will appear to float on the wrist with gaps under the lugs to the wrist. Unless you have a very big flat wrist of north of 8 inches.
Picked one up today. It's absolutely perfect because with the cyclops, it's like a bigger version of the submariner. I couldn't be happier. Great, in depth review!
Thank you for your great review. For me, it's the perfect Rolex Sport watch at the moment.
The new movement is a great improvement (you can already feel it when adjusting the time or winding the crown).
Another big improvement besides the perfect lugs and perfect size is the improvement of the pearl as well. In the submariner it sits higher but with the SD43 it sits much lower.
Amazing watch!!!
Rodrigo Quintero Bejarano - I agree with you entirely :)
Just a fantastic review. Best one I have seen. Great job. I keep coming back to this video over and over as I wait patiently and painfully for this watch to become available in my area. I have a larger wrist and I just think (for me) this is THE perfect watch. They just nailed it. The bracelet looks perfect. The width of the bezel looks just right for the 43 mm case size. The watch is thick and hefty, but not obnoxiously thick like the DSSD. I can't wait to try one on. Thanks for posting this Jack!
You're welcome, Mike! Thank you for the feedback - really appreciate it! Your love and passion for this watch mirrors mine and I really hope you acquire one.
I own many Rolexes and I have all of the dive Rolexes, including the 2018 Deepsea Sea-Dweller James Cameron and the Submariner Date (Hulk). Of all that I own, this SD 43 50th Anniversary is the one that's on my wrist right now. It's easily my favorite. It's simply perfect.
damachine3 - I totally get it - beautiful watch! Do you have the new GMT Pepsi too?
@@Brutelson Thanks! In addition to the above watches, I actually have two Pepsi jubilees...and two Batmen, a TT Root Beer GMT, and a SS ceramic Daytona. I'm now waiting for another Daytona (I have the black dial and I want the white dial) and a blue dial SS Sky-Dweller. My ADs have been very good to me!
damachine3 - lovely! I got mine in December. Haven’t reviewed it yet. I do love the TT Root Beer. I love that Clint Eastwood wore his vintage Root Beer in many of his movies. White Ceramic Daytona is another amazing choice. It’s the only white dial i prefer over a black dial.
@@Brutelson Same here! It's the only white dial that I prefer over a black dial. I initially thought I wanted the black dial, so I bought it. Now I have asked my dealer for the white dial and expect to get it fairly soon. Cheers!
BTW, you can see my review of the Pepsi on my channel.
Gorgeous!
Marc....you gunn'a get one of these new Sea Dwellers? I'm really thinking of getting on a list for one myself.
I got one last week. Absolutely love it and it pairs nicely with my DSSD-Cameron.
Bought this as my first Rolex recently and loving it. Cheers
Best for me is the excellent 3235 cal, But i'll keep my Deepsea. One thing that is never mentioned is the crystal on the DS is same hight as the bezel. So impossible to chip the outer edge unlike the Subs and sea dweller!
Jack , love the channel , SD 43 great watch just got a new one , as mentioned just like a large Submariner 👍🏻
Great review. THANK YOU.
don't know why "some" find the Cyclopes like an eye sore ??! ... i don't mind it all all especially for my aging eyes.
lovely watch. but i disagree with you on wearing it with something other than the Metal Bracelet. i've seen it on Rubber-B Strap and it looks Awesome... Thanks again.
Cheers
Went to buy the Deepsea and walked out with this baby (50th Anniversary). I have a 7 n 1/2 inch wrist, its perfect.Wear it nearly everyday, shared with my Omega Man on the Moon. ....OK now I'm just bragging =/
The Success Test - congratulations! Lovely combo too!
If you want a chunky diver, I would prefer a Seiko MM300, in terms of aesthetics.....at least.
Picking up mine tomorrow. I have the James Cameron and that one is top heavy but I'll never sell it as it was my first new Rolex that I bought. Since then it has been vintage Rolex's and Tudors. The Sub 5514 is the first Rolex with the HEV. I have a pre-COMEX 5514, no COMEX writing on the face. Great watch and it has more than doubled in price for me. Great review!
Hi,Do u know the quantity of 1266600 Mark 1
Thanks for the detailed review. Got mine last week. It's a very good balanced timepiece.
Great review! yes only thing is the date they took the beauty from the watch. Only negative. Thanks
beautiful watch and great review, now if my AD could only get me one !
once your used to 43, u will not look back on the 40. I own 44 omega and everytime I try on those rolex 40.. just couldnt accept them
Cam Neo I love the size, my first Rolex... I tried 40mm over and over again and it didn‘t not look right on my 20 1/2 cm wrist.
agree...i have 44mm Panerais and tried the 40mm GMT Rolex, and doesnt look right to me so now im looking for the 43SD.
Congrats and wear it in good health Many thanks one of the best review in regards of this model thanks again
You're very welcome, Ali Bakhit. Many thanks.
Hi Jack, very useful review, greatly appreciated! I'm on the list for this SD50, AD said she'd be able to get me one by XMas , which is lovely! Unfortunately, my wrist circumference is "only" 17cm, and probably closer to 16.5 in winter. Fortunately, I'm of a well-built stature - been going to the gym for years - and while my wrist is thin, my forearms aren't. Can I pull this off? I own a Breitling Superocean 42 which doesn't wear too big. Keen to hear your opinion. Thanks!
Hi Shuigui, I absolutely believe you can pull one off on your size wrist. To be fair you’re not too far off my 17.78cm size wrist and this SD43 fits a treat. It can’t hurt to carry on with those push ups - they’ll keep the wrists and forearms solid and this heavy hitting diver will supplement that for sure. It’s truly a beautiful watch - I’m excited for you. Merry Christmas and enjoy it.
Nice review but please take the time to get the wrist shot from a decent angle not too close up because it was totally unclear if it fit well or didn't based on what you showed. Great vid though.
Thank you for this. Are you saying that I should show a long shot of it on my wrist? Not sure what you mean by 'decent angle' as I did tilt and show different views of it on my wrist.
Many thanks.
Is my fantastic watch
Beautiful watch! I'm on the list for one, fingers crossed. By the way I believe it's referred to as "supercase" not "maxicase".
I think the magnifier should be optional, come without, but add it if you want.
Xclusive - Fantastic comment! This made my laugh a lot 😂
It is optional after you take it home. If you don't like it, take it off when you unbox it, it will take all of 5 to 10 min! With that said, I suspect this one will be a collector so I would keep it as is...
Great video.
Update since then on the cyclops. It’s been reported that due to the increase in size from 40 to 43, the movement was too small for the increased size. This caused the date window to sit awkwardly too far away from the edge of the watch. Adding the date magnifier gives the illusion of it being nicely placed on the dial. When looking at it without it, the date appears to sit way too far towards the middle if the watch.
Hopefully my AD will call before I die so I can have my very own!! Love it.
Great video.
Did you get one?
@@RocketDog73 I was actually called twice by two different ADs. I guess they aren’t as popular as the other models
Less demand maybe due to the size and less flippable than the submariner. Also the price for the over engineering is a bit hefty too.
@@RocketDog73 very likely
Im still saving up to get the james cameron version i love that watch
I have that one too, I love the dial. Better get once soon, I think it will be discontinued next spring.
Brilliant review and thanks for taking the time to take us through it in such detail. It would have been great to have included your wrist size prior to posting the video as it takes away somewhat from the experience. I will now be checking back to see if you have added it in description.
I am dying to lay my eyes/hands on one so lucky you.
Only other feedback is that it will great if you wore it properly and took the shots from different angles. It was resting above your wrist and on your hand so not a true reflection of a solid fitting.
Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work
Thank you Leonardo Pudicomp for your feedback - much appreciated.
However, the way I wore the watch in the video is how I actually wear it normally. I have an area of permanent rough skin below the knuckles where the crown on all my watches rubs slightly. Just my preference :)
I've added my wrist size to the description - 8 inches / 20cm in circumference.
Good luck!
Damn!. my wrist is only 6.5 inches :-(
I am concerned i wont be able to pull it off but looking forward to seeing one in person.
Stick your name down regardless. The AD will call you in and if you don't like the size, politely say 'no thank you' and the AD will call up the next person on their long waiting list.
A really great video, thanks for this.
I do love my 116600 sea dweller I’ll never sell it, but I do prefer the thickness of my deep sea. I just love thick watches.
Great review, thanks for sharing. I have to say I fully agree with your impression and I'll even go further.
I was lucky enough to purchase this watch two weeks ago at my AD, being first on the waiting list. It blew me away.
It's big on my 6.9in / 17.5cm wrist but not overly so, no overhang. It oozes masculinity without overdoing it. Larger case, dial (now 29mm), bezel, hour hand, bracelet (22mm). Tapered lugs and larger bracelet help with balance and proportion. Now at last with the first 3235 movement in a sports model. Then there's the red lettering to make it a little bit more special and remind us of its heritage. I just love everything about this watch. I paid retail for it and I did it gladly.
Such a purposeful looking toolwatch that doesn't need fat ugly lugs nor unbearably thick and top heavy case to make it look muscular. Rolex nailed it on the head. It is the perfect sports watch to me.
I also own a Yacht-Master platinum dial, got it just before it was discontinued in summer 2016. Compared to the new Sea-Dweller, the YM almost feels dainty and feminine, by today's standard, a much thinner and dressier piece for sure. They complement eachother rather well, one being bold and beautiful and the other refined and elegant if I may say so.
I might sell the YM as I think this Sea-Dweller is probably all the Rolex I'll ever want. In fact I'm tempted to drastically consolidate my collection after this and come closer to the one watch man I used to be long ago.
Yeah, this is how good this Sea-Dweller is. Its the Super Submariner I've always wanted.
Nexus Achiles - I couldn't have said it better myself!
Congratulations on obtaining one!
I too could easily revert to being a 'Lone Watch Wolf' / 'One Watch Man' - this Sea-Dweller has it all and I don't feel I will ever desire another Rolex.
I feel that a huge part of my watch addiction has been cured because of this piece. I still love watches but I have no desire to obtain another Diver.
Everything I need and want in a watch is right here 😘
dude it's gorgeous !!
What a lovely watch, the balance of the watch is superior to the Deep Sea. I don't believe Rolex will discontinue the watch after three years, I think they will keep it in their catalogue going forward.
Agreed, they got it right with is one. I do think they will lose the red script after this year though, to hold true to the original 1967 version.
Very nice and innovative, we will hear a lot about this new SD in the future 😉
Nice review. Assume you only just purchased the watch that day and a link to two came out afterwards. How's it holding out 5 years later?
I don't like how the endlink is higher in the centre than the outside pieces.
I'm going to sell my deepsea and get that 1 I hope I don't regret it the deepsea is perfect
I’ve got an SD4K but want this now. Lol.
Slipstream - The SD4K is still one of the best Sea-Dwellers ever made. It just took two years and an early discontinuation for people to realise. Hold on to it
Good review, thanks.
FYI this is a SD 50th Anniversary MK1 Dial. There is no Painted Crown at the 6 O'clock.. Just thought you might wanna know that ...The New MK2 have the crown painted at the 6 o'clock.
It’s been a while since I did this review. Did I imply that this was a MK2?
No. You never implied that. I really liked the review I have a Mk1. I was just making you aware of the difference if you were unaware.
In case you consider selling it you can ask for more because it is a Mk1
They made only a few Mk1s
@@scubadiversworld7337 yes very aware. I see so many owners of the MK2 getting bashed for having a ‘51st anniversary’ lol
Fonally a good review on youtube great presentation.
Thanks for the review and for the wrist shot. Congratulation!
I love my DEEPSEA first of all and it's not heavy or big if you have a big wrist like me. With that being said I do like the 50th anniversary and I really like the new date window just like the Submariner but it makes It look just like that the most common Rolex on the market "stainless steel submariner"..
Which do you think will be a better investment the D-Blue or the red seadweller?? I have a D-Blue but really tempted to swap for a red seadweller.....
Ash Burton - The Red SeaDweller will definitely be the better investment. The Blue SD is relatively attainable where as if you’re not already on a waiting list for the Red SD then you realistically won’t get one. It’s also a 50th Anniversary. If the 50th Submariner is anything to go by - I’d estimate that in 10-15 years time your Red SD investment will have at minimum doubled.
The new updated Blue SD released at Basel 2018 will in my opinion cannibalize the previous model with the inferior bracelet. So we may see the investment for these either slightly subside/hold rather than increase.
Hope this helps.
Jack C cheers for the detailed reply mate, i was hoping that they would discontinue the D-Blue but i have to agree with you i think now its had a proper release i cant see me making much on my D-Blue. My mate is next on the list for a 50th Sea-Dweller and has paid deposit, exchanged contracts, he is selling it to me but they keep the warranty card for 12 months now, so im lucky to be able to get one.
Ash Burton - That’s fantastic news on the Red SD - very happy for you. I can safely say that you’re going to like it much, much more than the Blue SD.
That’ll be a few pints you’ll owe your mate!
Although slightly annoying about the warranty card, a 12 month wait on a watch you’re planning to keep is a small sacrifice to appease the AD.
I was spared this rule when I got mine last year but they did insist on taking off all the plastic which was totally fine with me as I’ve been wearing it constantly ever since.
Jack C cheers, yes i hear most AD are taking the stickers off and insist on 12 month before relesing the warranty card on all sports models, fine by me and will only drive the grey market prices up i guess. 👍🏼
Not a Rolex hater but 904 is not ”better” than 316L and Ball for instance uses 904 still as well..mmkay?
beautiful beautiful clock.
So you really have an 8 inches wrist?
I like your review, but either your 8 inches wrist looks small or the watch looks a lot larger than 43 mm
Roy Andersen - Apologies - I've measured again and my wrist is 7 inches when the measuring tape is pulled taught.
lol made me lough
Hello, if you have to choose between Red Sea Dweller and Submariner Hulk, which one will you pick and why, thank you.
Hi Alam, I chose the Red Sea-Dweller because the proportion and size is better, it's more desirable and exclusive (factually and personally), it's the nicer looking watch, black is much more compatible for every occasion use than green, the 3235 movement in the Sea-Dweller is absolutely superb and better in every way and on a personal level I love the history behind the Sea-Dweller.
If you have the opportunity to get the Sea-Dweller at RRP or best price possible - do it without hesitation. You'll never need or want another watch. Good luck!
I appreciate your thoughts. I'm planning to get one tomorrow at $13700, Seadweller Red, New. Do you think it's too high?
Alam - I’ve seen a lot higher prices. I’d say go for it!
It's in USD.. How much have you seen?
And do you think the Sea dweller will be discontinued by next year?
Alam - yes I know it’s in USD. In the UK, this watch averages the equivalent of between $17-18.5K.
I believe it will run for 2-3 years max before discontinuation.
The amount of helium a diver breathes is dependant on the depth he will dive. I have worn my SD for 20 years in the water.
Amazing review mate. Think my mind is made up - next watch for me. My only complaint is how dare you belittle the nato strap 😂
Haha, you’re welcome! I’ve nothing against NATO’s straps in general - they are a great way to customise your watch. But with the SD43, a nato would dress it down in my opinion :)
All the best!
@@Brutelson your probably right, painful as it is for me to accept. Do you own the sea dweller or just review it?
@@chris3081 I owned it at the time but sold it to buy the Pepsi instead which I still have. I loved the SD but preferred the size and colours of the GMT Master II. Both amazing watches but I couldn’t afford to have both.
@@Brutelson fair enough size clearly better on the GMT, you seem to not care about the SD size in the video though. That’s what is making me think I’ll be fine. Did you ever find out what wrist size you have?
@@chris3081 my wrist size is 7 inches. I didn’t have a problem with the SD’s size (only the DeepSea which I respect but personally dislike because it’s not practical for daily wear). But 40mm is the ‘sweet spot’ for a Rolex and the Pepsi was just so slender and cool. It’s hard for a watch to pull off being both elegant and rugged which is the impression I get from the Pepsi. I tried it on before my name came up on the list and had to have it. But had that not been the case, I’d be rocking that SD right now because it is a beautiful piece.
My wrist is 20 cm. Submariner ist too small. SD with 43 mm is absolutly perfect for me.
Big, heavy, this is basically a great beach & leisure watch which means weekends and holidays. I have a SuperOcean Abyss for that : same size, automatic escape valve, 1500 meters, as attractive, a third of the price and I'm perfectly happy with an ETA movement. I much more prefer a 14060, at least I can wear this on a more everyday basis, like some of the thin sword-hands Seamasters.
I disagree - the SD "50th" is a perfect everyday watch and if it was my only watch I'd be extremely happy. I love Breitling, however the SuperOcean Abyss is an ugly dive watch and has nothing on this SD (except a better price tag. This SD's movement, steel, finishing, bezel, bracelet....need I go on....are all better than the Breitling. It is an unfair comparison - totally different leagues. The only watch worthy of being labelled a rival to this SD, in my opinion, is the Grand Seiko SBGA029 "Spring Drive Diver".
As for the Rolex 14060 - nice watch, but again a futile comparison. It is an older Rolex which is pre-ceramic with an inferior and archaic movement. This SD is the new Rolex Professional model people have been waiting for. It is such a shame that many watch enthusiasts won't be able to enjoy it due to the availability and super-inflated pre-owned prices.
I wish you well and please don't be offended by my disagreeing with you.
I hope you to get to see one of these in the flesh. If you do, let me know what you think.
superocean....hahahaha
So have you suffered the 3235 movement drying up and slowing down?
Properly fitted to your wrist the DSSD does not, in my experience, feel any heavier.
I agree Young, I own both the DSSD-Cameron and this new 43mm Sea Dweller, I don't find the DSSD top heavy , etc. They use a titanium back and that lightens the Deep Sea a lot. Also, I wear my watches on the tighter side on my wrist, so find no real weight difference between the DSSD and the new Sea Dweller.
Great review BTW....thank u
are there ball bearings underneath the bezel like the 44mm deepsea?
Yes.
Jack C cool thanks for the answer!
Funny, the only thing i didnt know was what a trip lock crown is...
I would still opt for the Cameron deepsea over this, beautiful blue black dial over boring black....
george ahmet The Cameron (just like any DeepSea) is an out-of-proportion watch. Fail by Rolex.
George, I just got the new 43mm Sea Dweller last week. I love it. However, I also have a DSSD-Cameron, and that is still my favorite Rolex. The gradient blue/black dial really out shines the new Sea Dweller's lacquered black dial, but the single line of red text is pretty darn cool.
Polar Roller - Congratulations, I remember you saying you were after one. Are you still loving it?
Oh yes, I was extremely lucky and got the new Sea dweller 43 mm in late September. Yes..I'm loving it. I alternate wearing it with the DSSD-Cameron every other day.
I really wish Rolex should consider a bigger size bezel with 47mm for the big boys!!!!! What should Rolex size now a days! Lovely
the increased case size without increasing the depth rating. cyclops doesn't fit at all. the only positive thing is the red marking and the new movement.
jakobus Maximus - they increased the case size to accommodate the new 3235 movement.
oj didn't know that. I probably have to see the watch in person to really jude it.
The extra case depth is negligible once its on the wrist and in comparison to the DeepSea there is no competition.
I think both can be appreciated on their own merit but I think Rolex have learnt from their mistakes with the DeepSea and SD4000 and produced what I believe to be an almost perfect Sea-Dweller.
I have jut established that the SD4000 and the 50th SD are 'both' 15mm in case depth.
jakobus Maximus: Finally someone knows they thickness!!! That was an issue for me. Over 15mm would have lost me...
Love it
Nice
Is it worth buying for £8.5k to sell on?
Great video. What's wrong with a 43mm?! That is just right size . A 43 mm size aims for a bigger demographic . Can't stay with a 38mm-40mm forever.
I have a 2002 Y series SeaDweller. I wear it if I don't want bling. This huge thing is all big, bling, in the face. If I want bling I'll slap on my black dial Daytona, steel bezel.
i wanted to buy one.simple, call a Dealer.called and emailed to 9 Dealers in Australia, 9!only one bothered to call me.paid a deposit, am 3rd on the list, and they have no idea when they will get mine.now I have to be content to look at videos of people who already have one, damn!
The case is the same size as the Ex2 42mm apart from 1mm lug difference
Rolex Sea dweller with a cyclops.
I love my £300 44mm Seagull Ocean Star with the cyclops on the sapphire.
Rolex Submariners are too small for me.
This model deep sea is the first Rolex I would buy if I had the money.
The bevelling on the case of my Seagull is better than this Sea Dweller.
neil piper Yes the 44mm SOS is a very handsome diver. My collective negative opinion on all current steel sports Rolex watches is that there is no bevelled edges anymore. There absolutely used to be but not anymore since the introduction of the ceramic models. Puzzling because Tudor still bevel their cases which definitely makes the finishing of their cases look better and crisper.
Sorry but what you state about the cyclops is wrong. It couldn't have anything to do with sapphire....because the older model references had DOMED PLEXIGLASS crystals....Oh, and thanks for the great review. Super watch.
Jake Jones - I think you've just substantiated that point entirely to be honest. But I am quoting Rolex on this. Whatever their reasons I am more than content with the cyclops now. It grows on you if you weren't previously a fan.
Love mine!!
Love the review apart from what you say about not putting it on a nato or otherwise. If and when i buy this watch i think it would suit a nato and many other straps .... for example check out @jackostraps on facebook or instagram for an incredible Ndc strap with absolute supreme comfort and military provenance.
Jatthew Mackson - Ha, I knew I'd come under fire from a NATO lover over my sentiments on this topic.
Each to their own, mate. I've tried mixing it up with NATO straps on previous watches but I can't get into it. I'm just a huge advocate of the quality, workmanship and comfort behind Rolex & Tudor bracelets. Steel all the way for me 👍🏻
I want to sell my Deepsea and get that
It look just like black sub from a distance and only a real watch enthusiastic know it's a deep sea.
Probably true, but I'm not sure the family resemblance is a bad thing...
Truth! ????
Looks to big for your wrist mate
Lugs are too wide for the bracelet, Rolex should have tapered it off better. The end links do not sit flush with the case and the watch looks blocky on your wrist. It is definitely too big and needs to be paired down a bit. The Tudor Black Bay (especially the new steel bezel) is a better watch.
Thank you for your feedback, however I 100% disagree with absolutely everything on your post. Rolex have rectified ALL the mistakes they made with the DSSD bracelet and created what is now a superb example which is proportionate, tapers beautifully with much better designed solid end links and has all the micro adjustment innovations to boot.
I love the original Tudor Black 2824 - superb watch and I'll never part with mine. The 'Black' Black Bay 2824 is the 'investment' one to grab (made for a very short period and limited production). I don't mind the second generation BBs but they have nothing on the originals.
As for the new Tudor Black Bay with Steel Bezel.... Personally, I think its another fail by Tudor. Its very reminiscent of the Hydronaut II - just less ugly. I predict that this new model will be a major flop which will be unfortunate as Tudor has had a bad couple of years lately. I still love the brand but they are in danger of flooding the mid-tier market with superfluous and inspirational models.
These are just my opinions, Mac - each to their own.
I do recommend that you see a Sea-Dweller 50th in person - I think you'll surprise yourself :)
I know you are blown away by this watch but seriously forward to 23.37, does that look aesthetic? I also agree that the cyclops has no business being on there as well. I personally expect a much more aesthetic design and fit for the price that they are asking.
Mac Daddy -
At 23:37 my wrist is arched at an angle to over-emphasise the case depth. In reality and when worn normally, the heft is disguised a lot underneath the watch. In my opinion, this enhances my appreciation and love of how well Rolex have designed this watch aesthetically.
Also (and I mean no disrespect at all Mac), what were you expecting?? Bottom line: this is a Sea-Dweller - with a new and incredibly durable movement and a depth rating of 4000ft! I am genuinely surprised that it's not thicker.
If you want slim - stick with the Submariner. I great watch and will always set the ' gold standard' when it comes to a quality, bullet-proof dive watch. The Submariner will never be beaten for what it is and has stood for all these years.
However......
If you want something a little bit more special with it's own history (albeit nicely connected to the Submariner) and significance in the Rolex Diver range - I vote a Sea-Dweller hands down and by a '50' mile stretch!
The 50th SD for me is almost perfect in every way shape and form.
As I said, I have made my peace with that damn cyclops ;)
All the best my friend!
Understood. You love the watch. That's cool. But for me it's proportions are all wrong and look strange on most wrists. I prefer the Tudor Black Bay proportions, fit and finish over the Rolex SD.
you think tudor black bay is a better watch than a rolex sea dweller...hahahaha! your smoking crack mate...
bracelet is miles too big for you
It looks too big
Wait 12 months, they will be in every store. They do this with every model. Rolex makes 1 million watches a year.
I wouldn't bet on the red text lasting for more than a year, like the original 1967 single line of red text. They might switch to two lines of red, or more probably, go to all white text.
If you want one of these, I'd suggest grabbing one as soon as you can!
Spot on after 12 month it's near enough impossible to get your hands on one unless you want to pay 13k on the second hand market.
Oh really?
Lucky bugger! 🤓
Please cut out the "absolutelies." I had to stop watching.
very bad revuew. He hold rge warch allways in same pespective no imagination.
Agreed. There are far better watch channels on CZcams that do the fancy editing and smooth transitions. I didn’t have the time back then to be very creative and still don’t. This review was also far too long. Lesson learnt.
very disappointed with this 50th annv SD, nothing more than a enlarged sub. the sub can be replicated but never duplicated. The disappointment comes from seeing rolex replicating it themselves.... but oh well, they own both, they can do whatever they want, but I m cherishing my sub date even more.
I disagree. If anything I would look at this as a more modern, beefed up sub on steroids. IMO, the sub seems too dainty by todays diver standards, I think they nailed it on this one!
with the money they charge for a watch not being able to get a colour correct on the bezel in unacceptable and just goes to show they’re overpriced and overrated
I wish I had of bought this watch
Hi there, great video, I’m looking at trading my submariner Hulk in for this over the next few days, you think this is a good idea? I love them both and as much as I’m not buying as an investment but because I love them do you think this could increase in value as much as the hulk has? Thanks